News Round-Up
- “The Dangers of the Biden Pandemic Plan” – Dr. Jay Bhattacharya warns in Brownstone that President Biden’s pandemic plan will effectively guarantee that lockdowns will return to the U.S. in the event of a new pandemic.
- “We are paying an enormous price for the bad science behind Covid lockdowns” – Experts used early poor-quality studies to feed into the general mania that supported restrictions, write Carl Heneghan and Tom Jefferson in the Telegraph.
- “Covid Lockdowns Disqualify Trump in 2024” – “Fifteen days to stop the spread” turned into an eternity, says Justin Hart in the Wall Street Journal.
- “Unvaccinated GP who refused to wear a mask fights dismissal” – Story in the Mail on Dr. Angela Musso, who was dismissed from Cutlers Hill Surgery in April last year because she did not wear a mask due to anxiety.
- “‘A very worrying scenario’: Internal documents on India COVID-19 vaccine raise troubling questions about approval process” – A STAT News review of documents on Bharat Biotech’s COVID-19 vaccine finds that regulators endorsed the vaccine despite discrepancies in the number of enrollees and other serious problems.
- “The SARS-CoV-2 Transmission Riddle – Part 13 The role of airborne transmission” – Carl Heneghan and Tom Jefferson say the evidence for airborne transmission is weaker than you might think.
- “The Under Reporting Factor in VAERS” – Unacceptable Jessica on a neat new way to calculate the URF from a comparison of V-Safe and VAERS report numbers.
- “Tis the season to be worried” – Dr. Roger Watson says it’s that time of year again: “The John Lewis advert is out, selection boxes are on the shelves in Tesco, and the NHS is heading for its annual winter crisis. By all accounts we are in for a bumper one this year – the worst crisis ever. So at least that’s something to look forward to.”
- ““Lies My Government Told Me”” – Dr. Robert Malone publishes an excerpt from his book which he is pleased to report is finally published as an E-book.
- “‘SafeBlood’ Hardliners Want to Set Up Unvaccinated Blood Banks” – Vice reports medics saying that growing numbers of people are asking for transfusions of unvaxxed blood.
- “Internal Email Exposes Shocking Rise in NICU Babies and Fetal Death Just Months After Rollout” – Watch a nurse tell Del Bigtree on the HighWire about a disturbing trend in her hospital.
- “Germany’s Compounding Energy Woes: Even Wind Power Industry Is ‘Sliding into Crisis’” – “Incalculable” record raw material prices, supply chain problems and a lack of profitability are cited, says Pierre Gosselin in WUWT.
- “Climate change is ‘driving the spillover of pathogens from bats’” – The Mail reports on a ludicrous research paper that blends Covid gobbledegook with climate gobbledegook to serve up the perfect canard.
- “Nationwide Cold Wave Continues with Numerous Low Temperature Records Likely to Be Set… Intense Great Lakes Snow Event on The Way” – Paul Dorian in WUWT says the nationwide cold wave in the U.S. will continue right through the upcoming weekend.
- “Full Ukrainian victory over Russia unlikely, warns top U.S. general” – Army General Mark Milley, Chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, cautioned that Russia still has significant combat power, according to the Telegraph.
- “Elon Musk, the man with technocracy in his blood” – Could Musk be waking up to the megalomania of a new world order, asks Niall McCrae in TCW Defending Freedom.
- “Brand Purpose, ESG & CSR. Salvation of the planet or tomorrow’s tyrannies?” – Chris Bullick describes his recent candid survey showing consumer backlash against tedious woke advertising.
- “Ticketing site wages ‘campaign of cancellation’ against gender-critical events” – Eventbrite has been accused of conducting a “campaign of cancellation” against women after pulling tickets for a string of gender-critical events over fears they could spread “hateful” views, the Telegraph reports.
- “There is no point to the Tories if all they do is surrender to the Left” – Why should the British public back a visionless party that no longer seems to believe in anything, asks Allister Heath in the Telegraph.
- “Kemi Badenoch: Beware the new authoritarians” – Speaking at the Cato Institute, the International Trade Secretary and Minister for Women and Equalities has warned of the rise of “new authoritarians” who “want to stop everything and ban everything”, reports UnHerd.
- “‘Its decolonising nonsense’: Universities minister hits out at woke courses for students” – New universities minister Robert Halfon said inserting critical race theory into courses such as computing and maths was not “real social justice”, in his first major speech in the job, according to the Mail. Yes, Robert, but what are you going to do about it?
- “Freedom of speech and the academic rigour it supports have been dealt a catastrophic blow… This will turn our universities into factories for indoctrination” – Frank Furedi in the Mail lambasts the QAA advice that all universities should ‘decolonise’ their curriculums and include teaching on concepts such as ‘white supremacy’ in courses such as classics.
- “In propagating this cult, they are illustrating the fact that their minds have been colonised by American grievance studies departments!” – Watch Toby talk to GB News‘s Mark Steyn about universities being advised to ‘decolonise’ subjects like maths and science.
If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
“Dr. Jay Bhattacharya warns in Brownstone that President Biden’s pandemic plan will effectively guarantee that lockdowns will return to the U.S. in the event of a new pandemic.”
There was no pandemic. Opinions vary on whether covid exists, but if you believe it does, it wasn’t a pandemic – unless we are accepting that the word has been redefined.
‘When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.’
Indeed. Alice in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass seem to have been somewhat prophetic.
The letter “L” is missing which would redefine the whole awful scenario we find the world in !!…
The word has indeed been recently redefined. Officially. By the WHO. From something that kills a lot of people to something that infects lots of people.
They eliminated death as an essential condition of a pandemic.
This trend of redefining words is highly alarming. They can redefine pandemic and vaccine to suit their explanations of what these words mean but what they are really doing is twisting reality to fit their version of it. It is trickster behaviour in a mythological sense and these organisations are just that: tricksters. They’ve tricked us all into believing something that is not true and once that is taken up by the media, the spell is complete and all the people will be spellbound.
Well the MSM are just whore outfits now Aethelred.
Yep, agreed. Like when is a “placebo” not a placebo? When it’s in a vaccine trial apparently. Then the word is redefined to mean any substance which isn’t used in the treatment arm. So any old vaccine or known toxin in a vial will do then. Just so long as it produces ill effects which mask just how bad the one being trialed in the treatment group is. Good old saline would obviously demonstrate too much of a contrast and that wouldn’t be good for business at all would it? But this is what naive me always understood the word to mean;
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/placebo
I believe another intrinsic part of the definition of “pandemic” used to be that there were NO known treatments available to deal with the disease. Which explains the banning of two extremely ‘safe and effective’ drugs with long track records Hydroxichloroquine and Ivermectin.
“Chris Bullick describes his recent candid survey showing consumer backlash against tedious woke advertising.”
Well, I find lots of advertising tedious, always have, that’s normal. Woke advertising is not normal, and it’s not really advertising, and tedious is not the right word. It’s a vicious attack on our civilisation.
👏 ✅ 👍
Until fairly recently outdoor gear companies were still overwhelmingly using white models but that’s now changing.
(I’m 62 and I’ve never seen a black person walking in the countryside.)
“(I’m 62 and I’ve never seen a black person walking in the countryside.)”
Nor me. I love the countryside and would recommend it to anyone, and think some other people’s recreational pursuits e.g. shopping are simply awful, but it just seems utterly patronising to me to think it’s a duty to tell everyone how they should choose to spend their free time – exactly the opposite of anti-racism.
Our rural English village has no black people at all. I don’t think that is unusual.
Our home counties town is pretty white. Given that we have various sizeable non-white and non-native British groups living in the UK, it’s arguably better for them to be spread out, and some are, to an extent, but many are not and I would argue that is their choice. I wouldn’t fancy the government trying to engineer things to stop people congregating in specific areas – I think we’ve had enough of government engineering.
Actually, when I lived in Cornwall you never saw any black people. It was the polar opposite of diverse. Then several years later I hit Leeds and it’s like a massive contrast. I much prefer a diverse community. It brings a totally different vibe to the place and enriches society I think.
There are aspects of mixing with other cultures that are enriching, others less so. It has always happened since the beginning of time. The issue is the pace and nature of change, and who gets to decide that pace. There’s also undeniably a tipping point where you import so many people of different backgrounds that the things that bind a country together and make it what it is are eroded to the point where the country/culture as-was no longer exists, and what comes after it is less pleasant for everybody in that country regardless of background.
But then I’m a far-right racist, apparently, who happens to feel that Western Christian civilisation and its offshoots has been the most successful in history at making life better for its citizens and that is important to preserve. But the other side have already won and we are doomed.
Yes I agree. I have sympathy with British people who’ve lived their whole lives in parts of London and slowly it’s changed so significantly that they find themselves in a tiny minority. All around are people speaking other languages, foreign signage everywhere, strange shops and no familiarity. Their culture has slowly been eroded and replaced with a hotchpotch of others ( primarily Muslim usually ). It no doubt affects social cohesion, I expect. I think I’d want to move away if I lived in such a place. Certainly I’ve been to places in London where I’ve been the only white person on a street. It’s fine for a visit but I’d need more of a balance for actually living someplace with more diversity.
In many cases the change has not been that slow, made much more pronounced by the tendency for groups to congregate with others from that group, especially if they have special dietary or religious requirements. This tendency causes problems, but I am reluctant to say it should interfered with – my preferred solution would be to wind the clock back and make immigration a way more gradual process.
Lol I remember when you never saw a black person on Midsomer Murders, not when I watched it when it starred John Nettles anyway, so there was all that uproar about it being too white, then we started to see more people of colour.
Actually I didn’t watch it after John left. The new guy wasn’t a patch on our Mr Nettles as Barnaby. And I always thought his wife looked too old to be having a baby….🤔
I saw a depiction of the WW2 fallen in knitted characters. Every skin tone was represented.
How many British WW2 ace pilots were black, I wonder?
I don’t pay much attention to advertising but on the occasion that I do, I always see mixed racial couples in the ads as if this is the reality of modern Britain. I have nothing against mixed racial couples or black people but I don’t like having the theme shoved down my throat. It’s as if it is a sign of racism, entitlement or whatever to depict white couples with white kids. I would happily have Black and Asian friends if I came into contact with them and liked them but I don’t. I have pretty much no interaction with any people from other racial groups. That’s not a choice, it’s a current reality and doesn’t reflect how I feel about people. I don’t consciously push away any black or Asian people, I just don’t have any contact with them and I think this is the same for perhaps the majority of the country when I think of all the people I know. It is probably different for certain sections of the urban population. This is what we are being led to believe is normal for this country because the advertisers etc are freaked out at not showing how inclusive… Read more »
Well said tof.
“Speaking at the Cato Institute, the International Trade Secretary and Minister for Women and Equalities has warned of the rise of “new authoritarians” who “want to stop everything and ban everything”, reports UnHerd.”
Ok, Kemi, great. Does that include lockdowns for bad flu, which you supported?
” New universities minister Robert Halfon said inserting critical race theory into courses such as computing and maths was not “real social justice”,”
I’m not sure what “real” social justice is. I’m not entirely sure what “social justice” is. What it seems to mean is something like attempting to fix unfixable problems, or pretending things are problems when they are not, or you could boil it down to “white man bad”. I see little cause for rejoicing in his statement because he’s simply accepting that “social justice” is a worthy and achievable goal and that this goal could legitimately be pursued in the course of teaching people stuff.
Your comment about ‘Alice in Wonderland’ is equally valid here!
I’m waiting to see what will happen in the biological and biomedical worlds. The worlds where there are innate differences between the sexes – you know, what’s determined by the genes in chromosomes. Will we be banned from using the phrases X-chromosome and Y-chromosome as they imply differences we cannot tolerate?
I live in Scotland where our mad leaders are hell-bent on removing the word ‘woman’ from our vocabulary. Yesterday, some woman said we need to move away from gendered medicine. I’ve never heard of gendered medicine but it must be a ‘thing’.
“Experts used early poor-quality studies to feed into the general mania that supported restrictions, write Carl Heneghan and Tom Jefferson in the Telegraph.”
Experts in lying.
Experts…mmm…who defines them as ‘experts’? What does ‘expert’ even mean? A quick look at definitions online comes up with ‘a person who has special skill or knowledge in some particular field’.Well I’d like to know exactly who these ‘experts’ are, what are their names, and what their ‘expertise’ is in. Did they consult a range of experts? Or just ones they have used before? Since a pandemic involves an awful lot of different areas, I wonder what these ‘experts’ were ‘expert’ in?
Some of them probably had a qualification in something relevant, though whether that makes them an “expert” is debatable. Experts in climbing the greasy pole, for sure.
Like most sceptics, if asked I can name a few experts who I trust because I have looked at their bio’s..and I’ve been able to qualify what they are saying with evidence…
Ask any fully paid up quacksinated what the name of the experts are whose advice they followed (because MSM told them to..) ….I’ll bet they can’t name one….
A blast from the past here..and excellent article from Aier…
https://www.aier.org/article/john-snow-vs-the-john-snow-memorandum/
John Snow Memorandum v The Great Barrington Declaration….
Which set of ‘experts’ has been proven to be more right? (Rhetorical!)
The Mail and Vice articles are pretty disgusting smear pieces.
Basically hate speech disguised as journalism.
I must say though that I came across this adjective abusing style of propaganda first, when reading articles by Sherelle Jacobs and Janet Daley.
What articles are you referring to, JB?
A really good Russel Brand, talking about Matt in the jungle….posing some good and important questions…..I found myself really agreeing with him, as I am one of those who thinks the situation is so shocking and surreal I have a hard time dealing with it….and no I don’t and won’t watch it….I find it truly disgusting on every level including the ethics of it….
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LE_MLJpv71k
https://sonar21.com/ukraines-epic-fail-at-manufacturing-a-false-flag/
Seems we can rule out the ‘accidental’ part of that one too.
Or did they send their rockets AFTER not hitting Russian ones…?!
This is so basic, that it’s frightening that any other claims were made, printed and believed.
covid inquiry now taking comments from public.
https://covid19.public-inquiry.uk share your experience
I hope there is enough room for it all!
Road fuel excise duty rise: https://www.gbnews.uk/news/petrol-and-diesel-to-go-up-by-12p-a-litre-secret-plan-to-raise-nearly-6-billion-buried-in-official-budget-documents/392018
It’s true that it was not mentioned in the speech in the HoC, as far as I can remember (and I watched it this morning). An automatic inflation increase.
“Road fuel excise duty rise:”
Thanks John.
Worse than even I predicted yesterday.
I had been searching for this. I knew something on fuel tax had to be in the budget but that chuffing coward didn’t have the balls to announce it. This will cause uproar. The effects on cost of living will be dramatic and could impoverish millions.
This measure plus energy increases will flatten the country.
https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg25634123-100-despite-reaching-8-billion-people-we-must-plan-for-population-decline/
Oh look who’s on board and discussing population reduction and how it is good for the planet.