An Analysis of Western Military Aid to Ukraine
How much military aid has the West given to Ukraine? What kinds of weapons has it supplied? And how does Ukraine’s wartime arsenal compare to Russia’s? I’ll try to answer these questions using the latest version of the Kiel Institute’s Ukraine Support Tracker.
From January 24th to October 3rd, the West gave a total of €41 billion in military aid (plus an additional €41 billion in non-military aid).
This equates to roughly 60% of annual Russian military spending. However, the figures are not directly comparable since Russian spending includes salaries as well as equipment, and about 40% of military aid to Ukraine is classified as “financial commitments” (e.g., to purchase weapons in the future).

The “Five Eyes” alliance comprising the U.S., Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand accounts for the overwhelming majority – 79% – of military aid to Ukraine. And the U.S. alone accounts for 67%. However, small European countries like Latvia and Estonia have given a higher percentage of their GDP in military aid.
During the period 2014–2021, the US gave Ukraine roughly $2.5 billion in military aid. Already by May of this year, it had given Ukraine more than twice as much as it gave to Afghanistan in any year between 2010 and 2020.

What kinds of weapons has the West supplied? The chart below tallies four kinds of heavy weapons: armoured vehicles, tanks, howitzers and MLRS (multiple launch rocket systems). Each tally is shown next to the number Ukraine demanded, and the number Russia had pre-war.

What stands out is how few units have been delivered relative to the numbers Russia had pre-war. Given that Ukraine has retaken a large amount of territory since April, this suggests that Western equipment is simply better, and/or that factors like morale, tactics and Western intelligence have given Ukraine an edge.
Particularly notable is how few MLRS units have been delivered – only 38 (plus an additional 26 to come). This is the category that includes HIMARS, which appears to have made a tangible difference on the battlefield, thanks to its pinpoint accuracy, short loading times and high mobility.
Of course, these numbers don’t include all the equipment Ukraine had pre-war. Looking at the IISS Military Balance 2022, we see that Ukraine had 850 main battle tanks; 2,300 armoured vehicles; 750 howitzers; and 350 MLRS. If we add these to the Western-supplied units, we see that within each category Ukraine still has less than half the pre-war Russian numbers.
One area where Ukraine may match or exceed Russian capabilities is “man-portable” anti-tank and air-defence systems. This is the category that includes Javelins, NLAWS and Stingers – of which Ukraine has received many thousands from the U.S. and Britain. Like HIMARS, they appear to have proven highly effective on the battlefield.
On the other hand, there are several areas where Russian capabilities clearly far exceed Ukraine’s, notably naval and aerospace warfare. This makes it all the more remarkable how much territory Ukraine has managed to retake, albeit at the cost of many killed and wounded servicemen.
The West – particularly the U.S. and Britain – has given Ukraine a huge amount of military aid this year. Yet in terms of total equipment, the country is still vastly out-matched by Russia. Ukraine’s success on the battlefield highlights the importance of having the right equipment, and of non-material factors like tactics and morale.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Like the Battle of Britain, the metric which really counts is that Ukraine is losing 6 of its fine young men to each one of the Russian-Federation Aligned young men. The point will come where UKR will collapse this winter and no amount of cow-country recently reclaimed to the applause of the MSM with $billions of UK/US weapons will matter.
RUS is operating a very frugal engagement, minimising losses, making tactical retreats where required. The MSM sees this as “victory” but where are the RUS casualties? The RUS are efficiently denuding both UKR and the West of its military and financial resources
The real question is can our Western so-called leaders really see what is coming our way?
Where did you get 6:1 from? My reading of the evidence is that it’s more like 2:1.
I listen to pod casts of The Duran, Scott Ritter, Col.Doug Macgregor. They seem to indicate approx 120k UKR deaths, 20K RUS. Injured on both sides is approx x3 of deaths.
I am sure people can critic these sources but that is why we are all here right? To be sceptical and question?
Remember with have a MSM that can tell us about every single with C19 death 24hrs a day, yet cant give us solid numbers on SAD or yellow-card Injuries. I cynically assume UKR/RUS deaths are equally hard to come by for the same reason?
The biggest question is….where are all the RUS bodies? One would think as UKR has been winning for 7 months now, a good proportion of the military and civilians would be busy burying the dead – which would be a good propaganda coup for UKR if they could. We are being lied (again) to an young men from both sides are dying because of this.
As of 21 September, the Russians claim to have killed 61,207 Ukrainian soldiers. I don’t think the true figure can be higher than that, given that you’d expect them to exaggerate their enemy’s losses.
And we are expected to believe the Russians’ claims about their losses?
An interesting follow up would be to show the West’s numbers, which must be quite depleted by now.
I’m not sure it’s safe to conclude that Ukraine is punching above its weight just because they have fewer weapons etc. Doesn’t that rather assume that Russia is committing more or less all they have to the operation in Ukraine?
Which successes on the battlefield are you talking about?
“Russian missiles hit Poland” – GB News.
Apparently two people were killed by “stray” missiles (although Lemberg is quite a long way off). I don’t know if this will change anything.
WASHINGTON, Nov 15 (Reuters) – The Pentagon said on Tuesday it could not confirm reports that Russian missiles have crossed into Poland near the Ukraine border.
Er which bit can’t it confirm? The Russian bit? Or missiles? Or in Poland? Or were they not clear? In any case, one wouldn’t expect them to rush this given the gravity.
Pictures of the debris seem to suggest that the damage was caused by Ukrainian air defence missiles.
If FTX was a Democrat money-laundering scheme, those ‘financial aid numbers from the USA might be very different?!
Interesting article, Noah, but you’ve missed the point that most such comparisons also miss. It is not right to compare Ukraine’s total arsenal with Russia’s. What matters is Ukraine’s total arsenal versus the total committed by Russia to the Ukraine invasion.
Clearly Russia has many other defence commitments, and troops and equipment in Eastern Siberia, for example, will not help them defeat Ukraine.
…also, do you think there will ever be an ‘update’ on the value of the weapons that didn’t make it to the ‘front’ or that were sold on the Black Market? Both Interpol and Europol have expressed worries on this score, as has the US Congress..to the extent that a special monitoring programme is being set-up in the US Embassy in Kiev, apparently it will be mainly focusing on the ‘big stuff’…
Meanwhile the ‘little stuff’?
“NBI suspects arms sent to Ukraine might be in criminal handsThe National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) says their preliminary intelligence suggests some weapons sent to Ukraine might have fallen into criminal hands in Finland.
Finland’s National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) said it has received preliminary information that criminals in Finland might have captured military arms, such as assault rifles, meant for Ukrainian forces.
“Weapons shipped [by various countries] to Ukraine have also been found in Sweden, Denmark and the Netherlands, We are going to be dealing with these arms for decades and pay the price here,” Ahlgren said.