News Round-Up
- “The NHS is at breaking point – and it’s about to get worse” – Last month, the number of twelve-hour waits in A&E departments in England exceeded 40,000 for the first time ever, notes Michael Simmons in the Spectator.
- “Nurses may be seen as heroes, but the RCN’s call for a 17.6% pay increase will not play well” – Ross Clark writes in the Telegraph that with most salary rises now below inflation, NHS staff will lose public sympathy if their unions continues to make outlandish demands.
- “The Government’s response to the nurses’ strike could destroy the NHS” – Why is NHS Chief Executive Amanda Pritchard paid £260,000 a year to preside over such inefficiency, asks Judith Woods in the Telegraph.
- “Nurses’ union facing growing mutiny over strikes” – The Telegraph reports that questions have been raised over the way the ballot was structured amid concerns for patients who will suffer from cancelled operations.
- “Global virus deaths have plummeted 90% since February ” – There were 9,400 fatalities from the virus around the world last week compared to more than 75,000 every seven days in early February, the Mail reports.
- “DeSantis Delivers in Huge Win for the Anti-Lockdown Movement” – Where DeSantis really stands out is in his wholehearted embrace from autumn 2020 onwards of the anti-lockdown movement in its entirety, suggests Michael Senger.
- “How selling mince pies landed a pensioner in prison” – We are still living with the fallout of our hysterical reaction to Covid, says Laurie Wastell in Spiked.
- “The sinister future planned by Covid insider Sir Jeremy Farrar” – Paula Jardine in TCW Defending Freedom on the grim future planned for us by our new biosecurity overlords.
- “Britain left out of post-Covid jobs recovery as early retirement surges” – The U.K. will be the only rich country with lower employment next year than before pandemic, reports the Telegraph.
- “Now doctors want children to mask-up in schools to stop the spread of flu — despite fears they stunted children’s development” – Dr. William Schaffner, an infectious diseases expert at Vanderbilt University, claimed that it was “reasonable” to start masking up in schools again as flu and RSV spread across the U.S., the Mail reports.
- “Less Than 7% of Canadian Children Under Five Have Received a COVID-19 Vaccine” – A surprisingly low figure in such a liberal-progressive country, as reported in the Epoch Times.
- “Jabonomics: Japan’s Ministry of Finance calls for an end to ‘free’ Covid jabs” – Japan’s Ministry of Finance is finally taking a stand against the endless spending on Covid vaccines, reports Guy Gin.
- “Managing COVID-19 – how could we have done (and do) better?” – Join SAGE’s resident Communist Susan Michie for an online Lunch Hour Lecture at UCL.
- “The true cost of renewable energy” – The big problem with renewables is their lack of reliability and the costs and shortages that imposes on the system, says Ross Clark in the Spectator.
- “What is the point of these police? As a lone protester forces the M25 to shut for the fourth day running and 17 officers stand around aimlessly, more and more hard-working citizens are seeking answers” – Outrage in the Mail as Chief Constable Chris Noble, who leads the National Police Chiefs Council on tackling protests, rejected Suella Braverman’s demands for officers to take a “firmer line”, saying: “We’re not going to arrest our way out of environmental protest.”
- “Ukraine urged to grasp ‘window of opportunity’ for peace talks with Russia” – The U.S. is holding discussions with the Kremlin ahead of a G20 summit showdown, reports the Telegraph.
- “Music school in trans row after telling students to ‘report’ women who oppose the ideology” – The Institute of Contemporary Music Performance has been forced to apologise after putting up a sign claiming female students who wanted single-sex spaces were “transphobic”.
- “The Scottish Book Trust has given up on free speech” – Writers’ organisations are betraying the people they’re meant to represent, says Joan Smith in UnHerd.
- “Students are running scared from debate” – William Clouston writes in Spiked that he faced boycotts, protests and online abuse for giving a talk on trade tariffs at York University.
- “Lawyer plans to sue Eventbrite after pulling tickets for trans debate” – The Mail reports that Sarah Phillimore is fundraising to take Eventbrite to court after it pulled tickets for her gender-critical book launch event.
- “Human sex is not determined at birth and can legally change, SNP argues in court” – In a controversial judicial review, Nicola Sturgeon’s Government is using biology-denying arguments to call on the courts to dismiss a case brought by feminist activists, the Telegraph reports.
- “British Airways will allow male pilots and cabin crew to wear make-up” – BA was said to be nearing the end of a review of its longstanding uniform policy after rival Virgin Atlantic announced it was making its traditional male and female uniform gender-neutral, reports the Mail.
- “Advertising’s false picture” – Rod Liddle in the Spectator bemoans that the fashionable aversion to ‘stereotypes’ is leading advertisers to portray a world very different from the one real people inhabit.
If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Good morning fellow Freedom Fighters and here’s one from yesterday:
https://off-guardian.org/2022/11/09/maternal-mortality-in-russia-tripled-in-2021/
I am now firmly of the opinion that Russia too is in on the depopulation agenda.
Morning. I’ve never got past this with Putin: why has he not outed the great reset? The only comebacks I get are “he has, listen to…”, and then some link to Putin talking about the slide of Western democracy and Western values, which are being interrupted as references to the great reset. But I’m not interested in Putin possibly talking about the great reset, I’m asking why hasn’t Putin said, without any possible doubt, that there is a great reset, like “the West have planned a great reset of it’s people, which involves economic and social reform, and it is being done under the guise of Covid, lockdowns, war etc. They plan a biosecurity state for their people and this has been coordinated and planned. The people are unaware and must realise what they are doing.”. Or something equally explicit. It has to be explicit. They’re is no reason for it not to be. Two reasons 1) the great reset doesn’t exist. But we know, without any doubt now, it does 2) Putin is complicit. It has always been 2 for me
As you say FL, Putin is complicit in the reset. Just what this war is about I’ve no idea, unless it is Putin’s more brutal but overt contribution and a means by which lies and deliberate falsehoods could be hidden : supply chain hold ups, food and fuel shortages, fertilisers no longer available etc.
Doubtless we will reach a true understanding as time passes.
Because Russia has entered a no limits alliance with the CCP.
I have found Edward Slavsquat articles on Substack to be enlightening and thought provoking about Russia. (I still do not support the Ukraine narrative!)
This is a random one. There are many others that would support your opinion.
https://edwardslavsquat.substack.com/p/voluntary-compulsory-covid-vaccination
Thanks ellie. 👍
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/danger-malthusians-at-work/
This goes beyond ‘worth reading in full’ and is in fact a must read.
Great read hux, thanks. Yes there’s way too many bad things happening and too many shifty players heavily invested, plus all the ones behind the scenes, for this to all be brushed off as coincidence. It’s like storm clouds forming but as strategic as a chess match. They’re playing the long game and things look decidedly ominous indeed. Here’s me trying to distance myself from all things Covid but this is only one piece of the plan and people must realise all things are completely intertwined. We’re just not meant to notice, that’s all.
“The big problem with renewables is their lack of reliability”.
That’s why I call them “unreliables”, and I notice some others are as well.
“Chief Constable Chris Noble, who leads the National Police Chiefs Council on tackling protests, rejected Suella Braverman’s demands for officers to take a “firmer line”, saying: “We’re not going to arrest our way out of environmental protest.””
Hmm, don’t remember them saying they were not going to arrest their way out of anti-lockdown protests. Ask Piers Corbyn et al.
Anyway, the protest part isn’t the issue, it’s deliberate disruption of other people’s lives.
Don’t they – the Police Chiefs – have to tow the line the Home Secretary instructs them to take? I thought she had some authority there. Maybe I’m wrong but it rather makes the position a bit toothless. Simply allowing the disruption to continue, which is all planned and seemingly endlessly funded, goes against the Highways Act 1980 which states: ‘Penalty for wilful obstruction. (1) If a person, without lawful authority or excuse, in any way wilfully obstructs the free passage along a highway he is guilty of an offence and liable to [F1imprisonment for a term not exceeding 51 weeks or] a fine [F2or both].’ Oh but wait….in 2022, surprise, surprise, various amendments were made as a result of the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022….I can’t stand legalese but this was the result. Can anyone decipher? Wilful obstruction of highway (1) Section 137 of the Highways Act 1980 (penalty for wilful obstruction) is amended as follows. (2) In subsection (1)— (a) after “liable to” insert “imprisonment for a term not exceeding 51 weeks or”; (b) for “not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale” substitute “or both”. So basically an overnight stay or even a few hours is what these ‘protestors’ can… Read more »
My view is the police are not doing their job, in the hope and expectation that the decent public will take the law in to their own hands and somebody gets killed. Funnily enough this will lead to draconian police actions and an excuse for further prohibitive legislation.
Because of the way the law was abused during covid, I think we should be wary of anything that restricts the right to protest – for example a big march with 100,000 people is almost inevitably going to obstruct some highway somewhere, for a period, but there has to be some kind of line drawn between obstruction that is incidental to a protest and obstruction that is an end in itself.
“We’re not going to arrest our way out of environmental protest.””
This is wholly irrelevant. Both Dan Wooton and Mike Graham, quoting from the Terrorism Act, have illustrated that these eco loons are terrorists under the terms of the Act.
The police, for whatever reasons, are simply refusing to do their job. As you say – keen enough to arrest and batter harmless lockdown protesters when it suited.
The point is that the Police DGAF about disruption to people’s lives. About a year ago they shut the M23 for about a day after a fatal crash where an American visitor participating in the London-Brighton vintage car rally got confused and joined the M23. Obviously it is sad that anyone dies in such circumstances, but once they had airlifted him to hospital and cleared up there is no reason to keep the road closed. Doubtless they will argue that they needed to carry out a full investigation but it was bleeding obvious what happened. My point is that they don’t have any sense of proportionality. They don’t care that there may be families with babies in the car that need feeding and changing. They don’t care that people may need the toilet. They don’t care that people will miss appointments and have their day ruined. As long as they get to play with their cameras and tape measures, they are happy. It also seems to be part of a wider trend that nobody cares about whether trains are running or roads are open any more. There is an implicit assumption that it is OK to let these services lapse… Read more »
You’re right – many things have become worse. No shortage of opportunism, to the extent that certain bureaucrats have been flexing their muscles to see what they can get away with, however stupid it was.
Yes, very interesting, Dog. I’ve noticed that a lot more roads these days are closed. Whether it’s because they are all in a dreadful state of repair – all at once – or there have been no road gangs due to Covid nonsense and hence they’re behind with their works or because councils just can’t be bothered, I do not know. But I totally agree with you that there is a trend about people just not caring so much about their jobs any longer. A societal shift is definitely happening and I feel that this general lack of care is due to something more profound – the loss of meaning and purpose. No one seems to know where we are going as a civilisation, least of all our clueless, corrupt leaders who just parrot what they’re told and have got all squirmy and excited by the wet dreams of Schwab and Gates who envisage poorer, less healthy, less free lives for the likes of us where we digitally kept track of in everything we do. Not one ‘leader’ (god knows they are NOT leaders) has any inspiring, nurturing, encouraging sense of a future that people can aspire to. Not one!… Read more »
Indeed. A one-mile stretch of road is being re-routed near me, project has slipped by a couple of years “because of covid”. Normally a 60 limit, now down to 30/40 mph “speed limit in place to protect workforce” – a workforce who are rarely there.
Thirty seven billion “spaffed” on Track and Trace. Much of that has been spent on road / traffic hardware and software which will really tighten the screw on travel when it becomes fully operational.
Disrupting travel is all part of the agenda. There is a deliberate intention to make travel unappealing and uncomfortable such that many of us think ‘oh sod it.’ The expectation is that by 2030 travel by the masses will be unavailable.
‘Work from home?’ It was an experiment, a trial run and I am sure the Davos Deviants will consider their trial a success so they will have no qualms about removing our rights to transport and travel.
“Rod Liddle in the Spectator bemoans that the fashionable aversion to ‘stereotypes’ is leading advertisers to portray a world very different from the one real people inhabit.”
Good to see this being called out in the relative mainstream, though it’s not really a fashionable aversion to stereotypes, it’s all-out war on our civilisation, destruction of the family.
Re: Just Stop Oil protests (not in the round up, I know, but very relevant), we need to be very wary, because the government’s strategy is painfully transparent: do little or nothing to stop the protesters, until the public starts pleading for restrictions on protests. Sounds familiar? Remember how at first, the government did little or nothing about their virus, until the public started pleading for lockdown, and even businesses started closing of their own accord? That way, they made sure to have the public on their side. I sense the same coming here: a high-profile day in court, with protesters being “made an example of” with some prison sentences, planned for the day after a law change. The public will rejoice, until they realise that a simple march protest is now illegal. Just Stop Oil are playing straight into the government’s hands; or are they actually government employees, there to make it appear that the public supports the green agenda? Nothing surprises me any more.
They’re funded by a relatively small nefarious bunch of crooks, apparently. The other day another commentator noted the arrangements of the relevant Ltd. company that handles the cash. It’s quite likely that the activists are being badly educated for whatever reason, and being conned into it. That might be quite familiar to many, over the last couple of years!
I feel it’s something else. The JSO actions in my view are designed to bring more attention to the non-existent climate crisis. The actions are always bold and outrageous – soup over a grand master’s painting, scaling the Dartford srossing Bridge, spraying orange paint all over the Home Office, and, although not strictly JSO, the dumping of faeces over Captain Tom’s memorial. All of these seem planned to create public outrage but also to highlight the group’s aims. The police do nothing though. Why? All the time, the JSO lot are called ‘eco-warriors’ as if they are heroes. It’s an interesting term. They could equally have been called ‘eco-activists’ but no. The idea that someone is a warrior means that they are bravely taking risks – risks to freedom and to life. The risks to freedom have proved empty as witnessed but the risks of injury (from cars and irate roadusers) and death (climbing the bridge) are very real. The ‘Eco-Worriers’ as I call them are at all times peaceful and their mantras and beliefs while unevidenced and hysterical are constantly spread throughout the media. They are getting free advertising, which I think is deliberate. It’s a sort of seeping… Read more »
Got it in one !
Evening all , I’m back ! courtesy of a new phone ! I’ve been shouting at the moon whist waiting to rejoin the throng !
I had been wondering where you had gone Freddy. Glad you are back.
And Nicola Sturge-un could legally become a fish…