News Round-Up

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Marcus Aurelius knew
3 years ago

Oh dear. David Sacks sadly falling for Musk’s charms. Yes, Mr Sacks, his buying Twitter is just the start, but not in the way you want to believe.

Musk is no fan of free speech. Mark my words.

“Truth” – as ever, a commodity available to the highest bidder.

Mornin all

Mogwai
3 years ago

And anyone who was on that list of WEF ‘young leaders’ is not to be trusted imo. Although what Leo DiCaprio and Charlize Theron were doing on there is anyone’s guess…

ebygum
3 years ago

Morning!…. This is just my train of thought at the moment..I’m not wholeheartedly disagreeing with you, but…. Twitter, whoever owns it, is likely to be open to much abuse. I think Elon does want to make it better, more free, a bit more democratic…. at the moment. That’s all we get I think, we can’t project into the future… He does seem to be engaging with people, and asking opinions….his own Twitter is interesting.. I also like the fact that people I despise are freaked out by Elon’s takeover…. This is a Tweet from Chris Pavlovski, the owner of Rumble, and Elon’s reply… The French Government has demanded that Rumble (@rumblevideo block Russian news sources. Like @elonmusk I won’t move our goal posts for any foreign government. Rumble will turn off France entirely (France isn’t material to us) and we will challenge the legality of this demand. @elonmusk Mar 5 Starlink has been told by some governments (not Ukraine) to block Russian news sources. We will not do so unless at gunpoint. Sorry to be a free speech absolutist. (me again…) The ‘world’ is watching, and has huge expectations…. and at this stage, at least, it seems to be going… Read more »

AethelredTheReadier
AethelredTheReadier
3 years ago
Reply to  ebygum

Musk is not to be trusted in my opinion. He ACTS like he cares about free speech but he is still the billionaire who owns Starlink (high potential for mass surveillance) which he allows Ukraine to access even to the point where the idea of weaponised drones was discussed. He is then reported to be proposing negotiations between Ukraine and Russia. His neuralink technology sounds initially like a good idea to help paralysed people but this also plays into the transhumanism agenda. He played around with all the buying, then not buying, then buying of Twitter. Now he has control of the most popular social media platform in the world. So, Starlink, Neuralink, Twitter…that’s an awful lot of power! Personally, I think it’s all a game to him. If he was truly going to allow unlimited free speech on Twitter and was on our side of the fence, I think TPTB would have somehow sabotaged the deal. He has already played politics by not allowing Trump his Twitter access before the mid-terms and says it is not possible….I don’t believe that. I think Musk lies and plays games all the time.

Marcus Aurelius knew
3 years ago

Hear hear

Marcus Aurelius knew
3 years ago
Reply to  ebygum

I have examined Musk for years. Morbidly fascinating. What he says and what he does are two very different things.

Mogwai
3 years ago

The Springer paper linked on Malone’s substack is excellent and well worth a read. I was just about to share it so glad I checked first. Instead, here is something completely different. An article from 2020 but recently shared on McCullough’s Telegram channel, all about DARPA and their research and goals to fiddle about with gene therapies, nanotech and human biology. It’s common knowledge that the Pentagon wants to create cyborg soldiers who will be “enhanced”, such as requiring less sleep, food and less emotional. One of DARPA’s projects involved the following aim; “an injection of a virus carrying light-sensitive sensors, or other chemical, biotech, or self-assembled nanobots that can reach individual neurons and control their activity independently without damaging sensitive tissue.”  This fascinating article takes a deep dive into previous DARPA projects and how their research is related to the pre-planned scamdemic and synthetic gene therapies, which, in case we forgot, previously failed in clinical trials; “..that the two coronavirus vaccines for SARS that managed to pass phase 1 trials ended up, in subsequent studies, causing immune hypersensitivity in mice “resulting in severe immunopathology,” i.e. permanent defects or malfunctions in the immune system. In addition, Nature also pointed out that it is unknown how strong an… Read more »

Chris P
Chris P
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

NZSIS are missing an ‘A’ and a have an extra ‘S’.

huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  Chris P

Incredible and frightening isn’t it?

AethelredTheReadier
AethelredTheReadier
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

I laughed, HP, because ridiculing these people is what they deserve. It’s ‘reds under the bed’ paranoia again, McCarthyism revisited. What I ridicule most is their faux-sincerity as they gaslight us towards totalitarianism. Extremism is not disagreeing with your government especially when that government has conspired to lock you up on your homes and demand you take a noxious and potentially fatal jab. They can shove their concern and nannying ways up their collective arse.

BurlingtonBertie
3 years ago

Interesting article on chemtrails with hard evidence in the form of an FOI that chemtrails are a real thing & what is being sprayed. One of the ingredients is carbon dioxide….

https://amandhavollmer.substack.com/p/the-canadian-weather-modification

huxleypiggles
3 years ago

Thanks BB. An eye-opening but disturbing read.

I like the author’s interpretation of “net zero / nil carbon.” As she explains, nil carbon is the Orwellian term for no more humans. Bloody obvious when you think about it.