Richard Tice v Bob Ward: Great Interview Puts ‘Settled’ Science Activist Claims On The Spot

A fascinating encounter took place last Sunday when Richard Tice debated climate change with the green energy promoter and climate activist Bob Ward from the LSE Grantham Research Institute. Fascinating, because the certitudes of ‘settled’ climate science are not often debated in the public square. On his Sunday morning TalkTV show, a well-informed Tice interrogated Ward on many of his extremist positions, including the notion that humans cause all climate change.

“Do you think we can stop climate change?” asked Tice. “Of course we can,” replied Ward, seemingly ignoring the fact that climate has always changed, and always will. All of the recent warming is caused by humans, he argues. This extreme view, held by many who suggest the science around climate change is ‘settled’, downplays past large temperature movements. Ward claims much of these changes were related to long-term orbital variations. It is warmer now than at any time in the last 12,000 years, he states, despite evidence to the contrary. Ward dismissed such evidence as coming from bloggers and a single Greenland ice core. This of course is the ‘hockey stick’ argument, and has been debunked by numerous scientists. Two recent scientific studies, for instance, examining plant and animal remains, have indicated much higher temperatures in Arctic Svalbard, 9,000 years ago, and northern China 8,000 to 5,000 years ago.

Of course, the politicisation of climate science and the idea that it is somehow settled have long acted to reduce the role of other atmospheric influences. This makes it much easier to demand that humans stop using fossil fuel and sign up to a command-and-control Net Zero agenda. Faced with no choice – scientists say – submission on an increasing number of fronts is demanded, with changes required on diet, individual transport, heating and cooling and foreign holidays. Almost unimaginable amounts of money must be spent to save the planet. Mr. Ward has spent years promoting this agenda, and is the Communications Director of the LSE Grantham Institute. This operation is partly funded by the green billionaire investor, Jeremy Grantham.

Of course, the notion that you can somehow stop the climate changing is an irrational form of climate denial. As we have seen in many recent Daily Sceptic articles, there is a huge and greatly under-reported scientific discussion on the ways the climate changes. The issues range from the ‘saturation’ of carbon dioxide and its diminishing warming properties to the vast heat exchanges that have always had a vital part to play. Directly linking all warming and cooling to changes in CO2, a trace atmospheric gas, is a science hypothesis that is unproven. Not a single peer-reviewed paper exists that provides conclusive proof. All forecasts of imminent climate thermogeddon are based on climate models, but these haven’t produced a single correct forecast in the last 40 years.

Tice went on to note a number of excellent environmental news items, including record numbers of polar bears, huge coral growth on the Great Barrier Reef and a recovery in Arctic summer sea ice. “What you are doing is ignoring the trends and cherry-picking the bits,” replied Ward. Two pictures showing similar levels of Arctic sea ice on May 24th 1995 and May 24th 2022 were dismissed with the odd comment: “You take two days and try to establish a trend.” Even odder was his reply to the news that the world was getting much greener under the influence of higher levels of CO2. He replied it was good, although it hadn’t made up for deforestation. Throwing in an unconnected red herring is a tried and tested debater’s trick to deflect inconvenient facts.

Of course ‘cherry-picking’ is precisely what Ward does all the time. During the interview, he claimed that hundreds of people had died in the recent summer heatwave and ‘wildfires’ had broken out on the outskirts of London. Claiming that a number of fires igniting during a period of temporary drought on a hot English day were caused by human-caused climate change is of course absurd, and unprovable. Nevertheless, as global warming runs out of steam, with little change since 1998, a huge, well-funded academic industry has grown up trying to attribute single extreme weather event to long-term changes in the climate. It might not surprise you to learn that climate models play a major role in this highly political endeavour.

Towards the end of the interview, Ward became increasingly agitated, suggesting the questioning by Tice was putting his viewers “at risk”.

They’re the ones who are suffering. They’re the ones who are having to pay through their lives and livelihoods being damaged… It seems you don’t care more people are suffering in this country for increasing rainfall. These are the important things that are happening to your viewers.

Debunking all these single event claims can be a full time job! At this point, I will just run the rainfall graph going back to 1840. As we have noted before, there is not much change in the past 180 years – the trend, it might be deduced, is fairly stable. A little extra rain recently, but not much different from the 1870s and the 1920s.

There is no doubt Ward would have been happier in a BBC studio, where he is a frequent visitor, and the questioning is more reverential. Indeed, it was something of a surprise to see him venturing outside his ‘safe space’. Almost all of his fellow green activists run a mile from such confrontations, hiding behind an increasingly smug ‘settled’ science claim and suggesting they will not ‘lend their credibility’ by debating people they smear as deniers. But the science is far from settled, and there are increasing demands for it to be investigated in the wider public space, as the awaiting horrors of Net Zero become increasingly apparent.

Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor.

Stop Press: Paul Homewood in TCW: Defending Freedom has fact-checked Ed Miliband’s hysterical claims about the risks of fracking after he gave an interview to the Independent in he said fracking won’t reduce gas prices, it isn’t safe and renewables are the only answer to our energy woes.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

29 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
wokeman
wokeman
3 years ago

Politicians are trying to claim they control the temperature of earth, just sit and think how absurd that is for a second. Why would they do something so absurd? Control.

huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  wokeman

“Do you think we can stop climate change?” asked Tice. “Of course we can,” replied Ward,”

Priceless.

And there it is. The sheer lobotomised, unbelievable, mindless stupidity of this whole religion is encapsulated in that short exchange.

Any eco nutter reading this must surely have a Damascene awakening on encountering such impossible garbage.

How on earth can people actually believe that mankind can adjust the earth’s temperature just like a room thermostat? Hubris off the scale.

DevonBlueBoy
DevonBlueBoy
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

The main disciples of this religion believe because the alternative is to lose their income and their places in the public spotlight. And that would never do.

JXB
JXB
3 years ago
Reply to  wokeman

Nobody knows the actual near surface temperature over the Earth . Global average temperature is just that, an average of data, and anyone who paid attention at school knows an average does not exist – where is the average man, woman, child, etc? Global temperature is derived from temperature measuring instruments from all over the Earth with varying degrees of accuracy, some in °C some in °F, and none calibrated to a common standard and reference instrument. Aggregating these readings compounds the inaccuracies to produce a ‘temperature’ unlikely to be true to within +/- 2C. Then the clowns talk about tenths of a degree warmer. Plus, most of the Earth’s surface has no temperature measuring instruments. Nearly the whole of Antarctica, except the warm West Coast,, much of Africa, South America, Arctic, Siberia, the oceans. Temperatures for these areas are estimations produced by everyone’s favourite, computer models. The Earth is warming slightly by virtue of emerging from an ice age. It will continue over the next few thousand years to a level probably similar to previous highs, and nothing Mankind does or doesn’t do will stop this. The last 100 years of recorded meteorological data shows no trend for climate.… Read more »

DonkeyKongPingPong
3 years ago
Reply to  JXB

You just don’t care about the poor Obama’s and the Gore’s, having to live in luxury beachside properties on Martha’s Vineyard. They are literally putting their lives on the line to protect you against man made climate change. To have to live and maintain those worthless properties on the frontline like that. So brave.

DevonBlueBoy
DevonBlueBoy
3 years ago
Reply to  JXB

Well said, a great rebuttal to all the bovine faeces being thrown around by the ‘climate change’ nutters.

JXB
JXB
3 years ago
Reply to  wokeman

Well they can control a virus – as we have seen – so controlling the climate is a piece of cake.

Stuart
3 years ago
Reply to  wokeman

Too many cnuts and not enough Canutes

JohnK
3 years ago

“…. happier in a BBC studio.”. Perhaps he has the opportunity to review the script before a so-called interview? No need to be scared about an unwanted question that way, a cynic might say. Simplifies the editors job a bit as well, perhaps, to fit it into the available time for a clip.

Nigel Sherratt
3 years ago

Grantham is a major player in the crazy importation of wood pellets for Drax from USA. That insanity funds his attack dog.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/01/25/friday-funny-bob-ward-loses-again/

Monro
3 years ago

So many of these individuals have sold their souls, a paid ‘claque’ for bloated plutocrats attempting to corner the market in one or another niches of the business opportunities such hogwash offers, via the public purse.

Where, we may also wonder, will the Skidmores of this world, ennobled, ermine bedecked, end up as advisers/consultants……

Oh! Who knew? Grantham has an investment fund dedicated to investing in companies focused on mitigating climate change…….

https://nordsip.com/2019/03/27/doom-gloom-but-great-investment-opportunities/

olaffreya
olaffreya
3 years ago
Reply to  Monro

Did ever have a soul in the first place? Sickeningly corrupt with a stench of privilege emanating from every one of their pores.

NeilParkin
3 years ago

Cui bono…

huxleypiggles
3 years ago

Well this piece put a smile on my face.

An excellent synopsis.

huxleypiggles
3 years ago

“It seems you don’t care more people are suffering in this country for increasing rainfall.”

Another comedy moment from Ward. Why then has the country been “suffering” with a hosepipe ban? Why are parts of the country still under a ban? And of course he is so ill prepared as to be unaware of the annual rainfall back to 1840 which shows little variation.

Caught out for failure to have full command of your specialised subject – that is right up there with MP level incompetence and they set a high bar in that regard.

JXB
JXB
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

But people are suffering because reliable, continuous output, cheap coal-fired, power stations have been replace by unreliable, intermittent output, expensive, heavily subsidised wind-turbines and an incoherent policy which has disincentivised investment in increasing reliable electricity supply.

DonkeyKongPingPong
3 years ago

What is most concerning is Bob is meant to be an expert who principally focuses on policy. In other words that man with all his technocratic rhetoric has the power to influence decisions that are going to affect all our lives.

JXB
JXB
3 years ago

Yes. He is not a climate scientist but is the first to dismiss anyone who challenges the climate change scam who isn’t as unqualified and therefore nothing they say is valid. He of course is allowed to participate in the conversation because he owns the truth.

stewart
3 years ago

“The trend can’t be set from two data points.”

Oh dear, oh dear..

stewart
3 years ago

The crap these finger wagging climate mullahs try to get away with is outrageous.

If you show him two pictures of the artic sea, one from 1995 and one from this year showing identical amounts of sea ice, that’s just one cherry picked piece of data that doesn’t tell the whole story.

But a single hurricane hitting Florida is apparently evidence of climate. change even in an historically calm hurricane season.

The moment they’re on the back foot they pull the “you don’t care about deaths” card. They did the same with covid. The moment you showed it wasn’t really that bad, it was “oh, so you don’t care if people die”.

The only thing this Ward character has convinced me of is that these prestigious posts in scientific organisations and committees are filled with mediocre mullahs rabidly defending their gravy train.

Occams Pangolin Pie
3 years ago

See how many events / fringe meetings at the Tory Conference have the ‘settled pseudo-science phrase’ Net Zero in the title. The Emperor’s Clothes have nothing on this delusory tale of woe for ordinary folk.

Meanwhile that big fiery ball called the Sun is probably rather more critical to our climate than Mr Ward would have us believe. Would he care to discuss sunspot activity?

Disband all think tanks as they are all funded by technocratic, eugenicist loons.

Meanwhile the Assisted Dying meeting chaired by a cuddly Woman’s Hour personage at Conference is bound to be a hoot. Free Midazolam goody bag includes a sachet of Bill & Melinda Horlicks – for that final sleep!

huxleypiggles
3 years ago

Free Midazolam goody bag includes a sachet of Bill & Melinda Horlicks – for that final sleep!

That’s a cracker. 😀😀

Mark S
3 years ago

Yes, all the climate change deniers like the “bloggers” at clintel.org. As far as I’m aware, very few scientists deny climate change but most do deny there is an emergency. Also, many would argue there is little we can do about it and if anything, we should be using our money to adapt to the changes rather than wasting it on green unicorns.

For a fist full of roubles

Ward does a good line in ad hominems.That is about it.

Andy Fitton
3 years ago

Perhaps a good question would be, “What temperature is the earth supposed to be?”

Human Resource 19510203
Human Resource 19510203
3 years ago
Reply to  Andy Fitton

Yes. Also what should the proportion of CO2 in the atmosphere be? Then watch them harumph and squirm.

Human Resource 19510203
Human Resource 19510203
3 years ago

How I long to see people like Ward and those he works for in the stocks as figures of ridicule. Pray God I live long enough.

MIKE HAGGAR
3 years ago

I’m careful not to argue against ‘man-made climate change’ from the perspective that man is indeed deliberately messing around with the weather and the planet’s geological structure.

It is a fact that equipment has been built and is used to alter the weather.

Recently it became apparent that arch misanthropist, Bill gates, has funded research into technology that can block sunlight, for example.

The US military possess ‘weather weapons’ and they even have a treaty to regulate the use of them.

China has been flagrantly breaking international law by continuously dumping sand into international waters and building military islands (see attached image for example of the scale of these things). Dubai has been doing the same in their territory, allowing the rich to buy their own man-made islands. We’re then told the sea level has risen by a couple of millimetres…

The Saudis have their own initiative to plant as many trees as possible, effectively regreening the desert. What do you suppose that does to the weather in other parts of the world?

china-massive.jpg
Bill Hickling
Bill Hickling
3 years ago

If Bob Ward thinks that we are the warmest in 12,000 years thus denying the Minoan, Roman, and Medieval warming perhaps he can explain how grapes were grown in Roman times in northern Britain. What a fool!