Who Sabotaged the Nord Stream Pipelines?

On Monday, the two Nord Stream pipelines connecting Russia and Germany sustained “unprecedented” damage in what look like deliberate acts of sabotage. The pipeline operator, Nord Stream AG, has said “it is not possible to estimate a timeframe for restoring the gas transport infrastructure”. And it may take another week before the pipelines can be inspected.

The question on everyone’s mind, of course, is whodunnit? There are four prime suspects: Russia, the U.S., Poland and Ukraine. Let’s consider each one in turn.

Russia is arguably the least likely suspect, given that the two pipelines were its main source of leverage over Europe. Indeed, Russia had previously given Europe an ultimatum: drop the sanctions and we’ll turn the gas back on. Europe initially refused, but there was always the possibility this would change. Russia was hoping that the ongoing energy crisis would eventually force Europe to give in.

Yet Russia’s ultimatum is now dead in the water, if you’ll excuse the pun.

The Nord Stream pipelines were more valuable than Russia’s other pipelines into Europe, as they didn’t incur transit fees to other countries. And as many people have been asking, why would Russia sabotage them when it could just keep them switched off?

However, there are a couple of theories that do lay the blame on Russia.

Sabotaging the pipelines might have been a way for Russia to signal: “We have the capability to blow up undersea pipelines, so Norway better watch out.” But did anyone doubt that Russia has this capability? And if it was the Russians, wouldn’t they have given us some kind of hint, while maintaining plausible deniability? (Like when they claim such-and-such “fell out of a window”.)

Alternatively, it could have been a false flag attack, or a desperate attempt to drive up gas prices. But again, these theories seem unlikely for the simple reason that having leverage over Europe is much more useful to Russia.

Another obvious suspect is Uncle Sam. As I noted in a previous article for the Daily Sceptic, the U.S. has been trying to sabotage Nord Stream 2 for years (via sanctions and other threats, not demolition). And this may have been one major reason why they got involved in Ukraine in the first place.  

There’s some circumstantial evidence that America was behind the sabotage.

At a press conference on February 7th, Biden stated, “If Russia invades … there will be no longer Nord Stream 2. We will bring an end to it.” He was then asked by a reporter how he could be so sure, given that the project is under Germany’s control. And he replied, “I promise you, we will be able to do that.”

And yesterday, a Polish MEP – who happens to be the husband of notorious Russia hawk Anne Applebaum – tweeted: “Thank you, USA” next to a picture of the gas leak. However, he subsequently backtracked, claiming that someone (tagging the Russian government) “did a special maintenance operation”.

There’s also evidence that the U.S. Navy was recently active in the area where the sabotage took place. Make of that what you will.

Now, readers will be aware that I’m generally sceptical of U.S. foreign policy. But if I had to put my money on it, I’d say this wasn’t the Americans. I could be wrong, of course. But it just doesn’t seem like their style.

Which brings me to suspect number three: Poland.

Like the U.S., Poland has long been opposed to Nord Stream 2 – though for slightly different reasons. Nord Stream 2 would circumvent the Yamal pipeline that runs through Poland, denying the Poles lucrative transit fees. And for understandable historical reasons, the Polish tend to be wary of Russo-German cooperation.

Since Russia’s invasion began, Poland has been one of the most hawkish countries in Europe, having given a higher percentage of its GDP in aid than everyone else besides Latvia and Estonia. It was also at the forefront of efforts to get EU sanctions on Russian energy. Meanwhile, Poland has been demanding war reparations from the Germans.

Just yesterday, the country completed its own pipeline from Norway (though this is may not have much impact on prices, as almost all Norwegian gas already goes to Europe). And back in August, the Polish president actually called for a “complete dismantling” of Nord Stream 2.

On the other hand, Poland is getting hit just as hard by the energy crisis as the rest of Europe. In August, the country recorded an inflation rate of 16.1% – above the European average, and even higher than Russia. This militates against the theory that Poland was behind the sabotage.  

The fourth and final suspect is Ukraine.

The Ukrainians opposed Nord Stream 2 for exactly the same reason as the Poles: it would circumvent the pipelines running through their country, denying them billions in transit fees. And if the pipeline had come to fruition, Ukraine would have lost influence with the EU – since its own pipelines would be obsolete.

Of course, Ukraine had an even stronger motive to sabotage the pipelines: preventing Europe from giving in to Russia’s ultimatum. Now that both pipelines are unusable, Europe has much less incentive to drop the sanctions against Russia, or to stop providing arms to Ukraine.

There’s also the fact that Russia has been attacking Ukraine’s infrastructure. So why not retaliate against Russia’s infrastructure? According to people who know more about such things than me, blowing up the pipelines was well within Ukraine’s capabilities. (The country received underwater drones from the UK back in August.)

Another reason why Ukraine may be the culprit is as follows. The Nord Stream pipelines are jointly owned by Russia and Germany. So if the U.S. or Poland sabotaged them, it means the West has directly attacked Russia. And if Russia sabotaged them, it means Russia has directly attacked NATO. I’m not sure either side is bold enough for that.

Ukraine, by contrast, is already at war with Russia. So from their point of view, sabotaging the pipelines is much less risky.

I don’t know who attacked the pipelines, and nor does anyone else. But if I had to guess: I’d say there’s a 10% chance it was Russia, a 20% chance it was America, a 30% chance it was Poland, and a 40% chance it was Ukraine.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

32 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
jburns75
jburns75
3 years ago

It’s a compelling viewpoint, but even assuming Ukraine was capable of it, would they really want to increase Russia’s economic leverage over Europe by further restricting gas supplies? It would just be furthering what Russia already threatened to do. If nobody took responsibility for it, and it was blamed on the Americans, would they want the public backlash around the world to impact America’s support for their defence? If it was seen as an act of hostility by Russia aimed at the west, it might galvanise support for their cause, but this support isn’t lacking in any case, and the risks would certainly seem to match or outweigh the benefits.

It could be the case that the pipes just burst. Could the proximity of one damage the other?

Even if this is true, we’re left with the fact that the US administration made stupid, hubristic threats that benefitted nobody, and have made themselves look like either dangerous vandals or fools.

TheGreenAcres
3 years ago
Reply to  jburns75

Explosions where detected by both Latvia and Denmark (probably via undersea seismology surveillance would be my guess), sabotage is as certain as it gets.

jburns75
jburns75
3 years ago
Reply to  TheGreenAcres

Thanks.

JohnOh
JohnOh
3 years ago

Good point about infrastructure attacks. Mutually assured misery? It would be stupid for the US to do something like this, but given who is currently president, it can’t be dismissed.

wokeman
wokeman
3 years ago
Reply to  JohnOh

You are assuming Biden is in control.

JohnOh
JohnOh
3 years ago
Reply to  wokeman

Exactly. Who ever may be in control, none of this is possible without Biden in the White House.

Nearhorburian
Nearhorburian
3 years ago

Ukraine doesn’t have naval forces in the Baltic.

JXB
JXB
3 years ago
Reply to  Nearhorburian

No but US/NATO does.

Taxi!

Nearhorburian
Nearhorburian
3 years ago
Reply to  JXB

That was clearly the point of my comment.

JXB
JXB
3 years ago

‘… I’d say this wasn’t the Americans. I could be wrong, of course. But it just doesn’t seem like their style.’

No their style is for the CIA to pay and equip somebody else to do Uncle Sam’s dirty work.

For example the Muhajideen in Afghanistan, paid and given weapons to attack… Oh look!… the Russians invading a nearby Country.

Gosh Batman. Holy coincidence!

JXB
JXB
3 years ago

1) ‘ The Nord Stream pipelines are jointly owned by Russia and Germany. So if the U.S. or Poland sabotaged them, it means the West has directly attacked Russia.

2) ‘Ukraine, by contrast, is already at war with Russia. So from their point of view, sabotaging the pipelines is much less risky.’

Er…

But if 1) is correct, then doesn’t 2) mean Ukraine has directly attacked Germany, a NATO member, and now NATO must come to the aid of Germany and… declare war on Ukraine?

Now here’s a pretty kettle of fish.

TheGreenAcres
3 years ago
Reply to  JXB

Under the EU’s interpretation of rules -also followed by Democrats in the US – rules mean whatever they want them to mean.

JaneDoeNL
JaneDoeNL
3 years ago

It doesn’t seem like the US’s style? Why not? Sure, they ploughed into Iraq and Afghanistan brazenly, but the US also has a long history of covert operations messing around in other people’s backyards, certainly in South America. In addition, this particular administration is unlike one of I have ever seen, it seems hellbent on destroying every single thing about the US: the economy, with the ridiculous covid rules, generally worse in Dem states, the military with the vaxx mandates, law enforcement and health care with the vaxx mandates, law enforcement with emasculation to appease BLM and pro-fa antifa, education, particularly higher education with its focus on matters apparently intended to make people lynch their own sanity. The current US administration is driving the Russia/Ukraine war, handing over obscene amounts of money and weapons with what appears to be zero oversight. It clearly cares not a jot for how European nations will fare following their nonsensical sanctions, while the US benefits from higher oil prices and sales of LNG. It is certainly possible that Poland or Ukraine were happy to do the dirty work, but I find it incredible to believe they would have done so without Uncle Sam’s say-so.… Read more »

TheGreenAcres
3 years ago

A good summary of the evidence.

I doubt Poland or Ukraine would do such a thing without running it by the USA however, and any plans to do such without informing Uncle Sam would almost certainly be detected by the CIA who have their listening devices and covert surveillance everywhere. A cricket couldn’t fart in a European government or military building without the CIA hearing it – and I include Britain in that as well.

Nigel Sherratt
3 years ago
Reply to  TheGreenAcres

Pity they missed 9/11 though.

stewart
3 years ago
Reply to  TheGreenAcres

I find it impossible to believe the Ukraine would take major action without clearance from the US. Same goes with Poland.

The likeliest is that somebody did it with US clearance or even on request. I mean, rhe whole war is a proxy war run by the US/NATO.

wokeman
wokeman
3 years ago

Putin whilst unhinged isn’t quite in to blowing up his own home, avd if he’s done it he’s wandered past NATO security rather easily. It’s hardly a leap with the billions sunk in that the Ukraine most likely did this. Which is basically a proxy for the USA having done it. In summary, Ukrainians, assisted by poles backed with US money.

Nigel Sherratt
3 years ago
Reply to  wokeman

Putin blew up blocks of flats in Moscow, Buinaksk and Volgodonsk to justify his horrendous escalation in Chechnya when his approval was low, he’s hardly looked back since then (until now). Germany suspended certification of NS2 on 22 February 2022 (plainly what Biden was referring to was USA’s influence over Germany perhaps by threatening to reveal Merkel’s as well as Schröder’s ties). Putin shut down NS1 with some story about repairs on 1 September 2022. European gas storage is above average. Ukraine gains little and would lose much. They have show themselves to be extremely canny so such a move by them makes little sense because of the dependence on USA/European goodwill for their survival. Still, good to have the view from RT now that access is harder.

wokeman
wokeman
3 years ago
Reply to  Nigel Sherratt

Yeah sure it’s an RT view, given I’m calling Putin unhinged. Blowing up blocks of flats is hardly the same as blowing up a pipeline. The correct analogy would be him scuttling his own navy. Mind you it’s possible you are right our own government blew up power stations here for no discernible reason. I’m just wondering what you think the win for Russia is here in doing this? Ukraine gains rather alot, didn’t you notice it has a pipeline, I’m not sure there is any lose in destroying Nordstream. But yeah sure thanks for the war machine view, it’s reassuring.

Nigel Sherratt
3 years ago
Reply to  wokeman

The RT comment was directed at the author of this piece. What was the win for Putin’s war machine in invading Ukraine in 2014 and again in 2022 after regrouping? Putin is far from unhinged it’s just that the logic is hard to follow at times. Why was Dugina blown up? I find Kamil Galeev a good guide to the many mysteries.

wokeman
wokeman
3 years ago
Reply to  Nigel Sherratt

I’m not sure that’s fair, the author is still giving a 10% chance Russia was behind it, not exactly vanishingly small odds.

ebygum
3 years ago
Reply to  Nigel Sherratt

LOL..so what British MSM comments are you espousing? If you can give me an example of a non pro-Ukrainian propaganda media outlet..one that’s looking at both sides of the conflict….I’ll eat my hat!!!
There isn’t one British newspaper or media channel that is reporting fairly and honestly, so why should RT be held to a higher example?
The entire British MSM is the UK version of RT, no real difference as far as I can see..except the rank hypocrisy coming from the UK of course….
Sorry, it’s not even an insult in my book.

TheGreenAcres
3 years ago

The Ukrainians opposed Nord Stream 2 for exactly the same reason as the Poles: it would circumvent the pipelines running through their country, denying them billions in transit fees.

Does anyone know of any US politicians with family ties to Ukrainian energy companies by any chance?

Hugh
Hugh
3 years ago
Reply to  TheGreenAcres

Ah, Putin’s “cornered rat”.

JohnOh
JohnOh
3 years ago

Siemens will profit. They built it and they will now fix it.

wokeman
wokeman
3 years ago
Reply to  JohnOh

Jim’ll fix it!

Cameron
Cameron
3 years ago

There is a contractual arrangement between Russia and Germany (or the companies involved). If the flow is turned off unilaterally without agreement presumeably there is a contractual liability. Whereas if the flow ceases because of external force majeur (sabotage) . . . then the party that stops the flow avoids the contractual penalty.

AethelredTheReadier
AethelredTheReadier
3 years ago

Sorry Noah but this has US deep state written all over it. I imagine that Ukraine and Poland just don’t have the expertise for such an operation nor the deviousness – have you ever heard of either country involved in such operations before? No, neither have I. Russia wouldn’t blow up its main bargaining chip to prove that it can blow up a pipeline – that’s just daft. The US are the main culprits: Biden said he would take it out; there was a US warship capable of such operations in the actual area that then steamed off after the incidents; and they have a long track record of black ops and all the rest including, if I’m not mistaken, starting many long running conflicts, regime changes, assassinations and so on. I’m not even going to mention 9/11. The US have all the motives and all the expertise, anyone looking elsewhere is following a red herring.

ebygum
3 years ago

I tend to agree..if it looks like a duck etc…both Biden and Nuland have spoken about stopping Nordstream one way or the other this year…why look any further, or try to twist things around when it appears pretty obvious. I suppose the same people who think Russia did it themselves are the same ones that think they were bombing themselves inside the the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant…

It is interesting that there have been many protests in Germany against NATO, Government and sanctions..something the MSM studiously ignore…(there’s currently a huge anti-NATO/Government/sanctions protest happening in Prague at the moment) Only a week or so ago Putin told Germany that if sanctions against them were stopped then there would be no problem with Nordstream..it just doesn’t make sense to me that he would scupper that….
The Bundestag have been calling for an end to sanctions for a while now, and yesterday voted against increasing the supply of weapons to Ukraine….
I personally think they were seen to be ‘wavering’ and so……?

Interestingly in early September US Congress approved the allocation of $288.5 million to Poland…in new foreign military finance….that allocation was approved today!
(for services rendered?)

lymeswold
lymeswold
3 years ago

US BALTOPS – seapowermagazine.org/ baltops-22-a-perfect-opportunity-for-research-and-resting-new-technology

Kornea112
Kornea112
3 years ago

Who needs pipelines anyways? According to the climate crazy crowd,, just build some more wind turbines and solar arrays. Maybe if a few more of them glued themselves to roads people would listen to them. Thr reality of the strategic importance of petroleum is very evident in most of the world. Only in rich western countries where many live in poorly governed, affluent self-indulgent bubbles is this not evident.

Nigel Sherratt
3 years ago

A more plausible explanation of both motive and method, no spooks or mini subs (just ‘pigs’ in the pipes). The Russian spox saying today that it was in the area controlled by US intelligence is a bit of a tell!

https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/russia-says-nord-stream-leaks-occurred-zone-controlled-by-us-intelligence-2022-09-29/

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1575222209525972993.html

Trent Telenko was the author of the famous Russian tires thread explaining why failure to maintain equipment meant Russia was in trouble since logistics is more or less all as the methodical choice of targets by Ukraine shows.