Suspend All COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Until Side-Effects are Fully Investigated, Says Leading Doctor Who Promoted Them on TV
Leading doctors have joined a call to suspend all COVID-19 mRNA vaccines until serious side-effects are fully investigated and the raw trial data from Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine trial are released for independent analysis to help determine the true benefits and potential harms for different age groups.
Writing in the peer-reviewed Journal of Insulin Resistance, one of the U.K.’s most eminent Consultant Cardiologists Dr. Aseem Malhotra, who was one of the first to take two doses of the vaccine and promote it on Good Morning Britain on TV, says that since the rollout of the vaccine the evidence of its effectiveness and true rates of adverse events has changed.
In a two-part research paper entitled “Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine”, real-world data reveal that in the non-elderly population the number needed to vaccinate to prevent one death from COVID-19 runs into thousands and that re-analysis of randomised controlled trial data (that first led to approval of the vaccines for Pfizer and Moderna) suggests a greater risk of suffering a serious adverse event from the vaccine than being hospitalised with COVID-19.
Dr. Malhotra writes: “Pharmacovigilance systems and real-world safety data, coupled with plausible mechanisms of harm, are deeply concerning, especially in relation to cardiovascular safety.”
Mirroring a potential signal from the Pfizer Phase 3 clinical trial, a significant rise in cardiac arrest calls to ambulances in England was seen in 2021 (an extra 14,000 compared to 2020) with similar data emerging from Israel in the 16-39 year old age group where there was a 25% increase in heart attacks or cardiac arrests associated with the Pfizer vaccine administration but not associated with COVID-19.
Citing the FDA’s own website he also highlights that testing positive for antibodies is an unreliable marker for immunity or protection against Covid post-vaccination.
He writes:
It cannot be said that the consent to receive these agents was fully informed, as is required ethically and legally.
Authorities and sections of the medical profession have supported unethical, coercive and misinformed policies such as vaccine mandates and vaccine passports, undermining the principles of informed consent. These regrettable actions are a symptom of the ‘medical misinformation mess’: The tip of a mortality iceberg where prescribed medications are estimated to be the third most common cause of death globally after heart disease and cancer.
Underlying causes for this failure include regulatory capture – guardians that are supposed to protect the public are in fact funded by the very corporations that stand to gain from the sale of those medications. A failure of public health messaging has also resulted in wanton waste of resources and a missed opportunity to help individuals lead healthier lives with relatively simple – and low cost – lifestyle changes.
The unprecedented rollout of an emergency use authorisation vaccine without access to the raw data, with increasing evidence of significant harms, compounded by mandates that appear to serve no purpose other than to bolster the profits of the drug industry, have highlighted modern medicine’s worst failings on an epic scale, with additional catastrophic harms to trust in public health.
There is a strong scientific, ethical and moral case to be made that the current Covid vaccine administration must stop until all the raw data has been subjected to fully independent scrutiny. Looking to the future, the medical and public health professionals must recognise these failings and eschew the tainted dollar of the medical-industrial complex. It will take a lot of time and effort to rebuild trust in these institutions, but the health of both humanity and the medical profession depend on it.
He concludes:
We must use this as an opportunity to transform the system to produce better doctors, better decision making, healthier patients and restore trust in medicine and public health. Until all the raw data on the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines have been independently analysed, any claims purporting that they confer a net benefit to humankind cannot be considered to be evidence based.
Professor of Vascular Surgery and President of the International Vascular Society Dr. Sherif Sultan said:
Doctor Aseem Malhotra’s literature review and analysis is a cause for global concern. We fully believe that vaccines are one of the great discoveries in medicine that has improved life-expectancy dramatically. However, mRNA genetic vaccines are different, as long-term safety evaluation is lacking but mandatory to ensure public safety. These findings raise concerns regarding vaccine-induced undetected severe cardiovascular side-effects and underscore the established causal relationship between vaccines and myocarditis, a frequent cause of unexpected cardiac arrest in young individuals. Surveillance of potential vaccine side-effects and COVID-19 outcomes to identify public health trends and promptly investigate potential underlying causes needs immediate attention.
Professor of Medicine and Epidemiology at the University of Stanford Jay Bhattacharya said:
Dr. Aseem Malhotra has written detailed narrative review of the literature on the uses and abuses of the mRNA Covid vaccines. Dr. Malhotra makes a good case that there is considerable heterogeneity across age groups and other comorbid conditions in the expected benefits and expected side-effect profiles of the vaccine. He finds that while there may be a case for older people to take the vaccine because the benefits may outweigh expected harm, that may not be the case for younger people. Dr. Malhotra’s paper calls for a pause in the use of the vaccine in younger people, such as the one recently adopted by Danish public health authorities and the Florida department of public health in the United States. He calls for investigation of side-effect profiles of mRNA vaccines and for a halt to any vaccine mandate programmes involving Covid vaccines. These papers should be considered carefully by all public health authorities who seek to adopt principles of evidence based medicine in their recommendations to the public regarding the Covid mRNA vaccines.
Dr. Amir Hannan MBE, General Practitioner and Chairman of the West Pennine Local Medical Committee, Greater Manchester said:
Dr. Aseem Malhotra should be congratulated for putting this all together to help inform the public, the medical profession, the regulators, Government, the pharmaceutical industry and wider society. Drug treatments and vaccinations can be an important part of helping to overcome disease and prevent illness but we must remain vigilant against over-reliance on the benefits and minimising or even suppressing the harms. Greater scrutiny of the data and those overseeing medical practice is needed to ensure the public and the profession remain safe. An urgent review is needed of the materials and information provided on the COVID-19 vaccines to help inform the public so that informed consent is gained through a shared decision-making process with education and training in light of the new evidence emerging.
Dr. Campbell Murdoch, General Practitioner and Clinical Advisor to the Royal College of General Practitioners said:
Provision of safe and effective healthcare sits at the heart of medical services. As a GP this is central to every action I take with patients. The healthcare regulator in England, the Care Quality Commission, requires this from all providers of medical care.
As Dr. Malhotra describes, to be able to provide safe and effective care all healthcare professionals must practice evidence-based medicine. This is a combination of using the best available scientific evidence, the patient’s preferences, and the healthcare professional’s expertise. The combination of these three factors allows the patient to make an informed choice about what is best for their health.
In the case of the COVID-19 vaccination Dr Malhotra describes multiple systemic failures in the provision of safe and effective evidence-based medicine. Consequently, it has been impossible for patients and the public to make an informed choice about what is best for their health and life.
High quality healthcare requires organisations and individuals to act with complete integrity. Without this the delivery of safe and effective healthcare will always fail.
Errors in healthcare can provide an opportunity to improve. It is now time to reflect and learn from the experience of the COVID-19 vaccination. Healthcare must always help, not harm.
Dr. Bob Gill, General Practitioner, activist and producer of documentary “The Great NHS Heist” said:
This important two-part review of the impact of the international rollout of mRNA vaccination programme highlights significant concerns about the overstated benefits of vaccination especially in low-risk populations and the under-reporting of adverse events. Public information and consent to vaccination has not been balanced, neglecting discussion of individual risk versus benefit of having the shot. The quality of evidence provided by vaccine producers and lack of openness from the pharmaceutical industry risk long-lasting damage to confidence in public health interventions.
Part two of the review sets out how regulatory capture by pharmaceutical corporations and their immense financial power influences politicians and media to promote products at the expense of scientific scrutiny and unfettered access to research on which decisions of immense impact are made. Bias and conflicts of interest abound in the medical-industrial complex with well-documented adverse outcome for patients from over-medicalisation and prescription drugs. Coercive vaccine mandates based on biased and short trials with unpublished raw data are the culmination of the unchecked power of the pharmaceutical industry to the exclusion of effective lifestyle-factor risk reduction, which was ignored by media and politicians alike.
Given the declining virulence of the infection and mounting evidence of vaccine-related harms, there can be no justification to continued mass roll-out of booster programmes, given the short-term risks from the vaccine likely outweigh the benefits for the majority of the population and we remain ignorant of the long-term risk to health.
Dr. Renee Hoenderkamp, General Practitioner, writer and broadcaster said:
This is an important paper from Aseem. As a GP in a small practice I have two young patients with post-vaccine heart conditions confirmed. They were not counselled on the risk of this as part of an informed consent process. Surely any medical professional should want their patients to fully understand the risks and benefits of a medication they take, and welcome that discussion? As the evidence evolves and we see clearly that the risk from both COVID-9 and the vaccine designed to protect against it differs massively by age, sex, co-morbidity and previous infection, it becomes ever more important to give patients the information they need to make an informed decision. This important paper brings those risks and benefits into sharp focus and should allow the desperately needed discussion that has thus far been sorely missing from any examination of vaccination benefit and harms. Aseem opens up the discussion around both the harms and the ability to have a healthy discourse and I welcome it.
Stop Press: Watch Dr. Aseem explain his paper and why he’s changed his mind on the mRNA vaccines.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
And suspend the Times muppets who refuse to allow their journalists to properly report and investigate this issue. Like their journalist Oliver Wright did for the Independent in 2014:
Big Pharma lobbyists exploit patients and doctors | The Independent | The Independent
Revealed: Big Pharma’s hidden links to NHS policy, with senior MPs saying medical industry uses ‘wealth to influence government’ | The Independent | The Independent
(Try reloading the page to reveal the whole story).
“This is an important paper from Aseem. As a GP in a small practice I have two young patients with post-vaccine heart conditions confirmed. They were not counselled on the risk of this as part of an informed consent process.”
Goodness, that sounds pretty darned incriminating!
Oh, and a constituent of David Aimess MP told me some weeks back that Aimess was heading an investigation into the pharmaceutical industry, and wondered if that was the real reason for his murder. I suppose we’ll never know… Bent bunch of (word I never use on here).
Bent bunch of (word I never use on here).
“Next Tuesday Warriors.”
Near enough. 😉
Incidentally, the “far right” Brothers of Italy are set to win their election. Who’d have thunk it? My long standing position is that the insane trashing of ecomomies starting in 2020 would have profound effects on politics and stability. And here we are, with another surprise election result (following on from Sweden), and an escalation of the European war that started in 2014 (plus the war in Ethiopia). Coincidence? Really?
Weren’t they opposed to the Green Pass? They might have garnered a few votes as a result.
Is that a reference to “see you next Tuesday”?
Indeed it is.
Can you translate, please – for those of us not in on the joke?
Probably I need more coffee to help me understand what’s being said….
Jane, it’s a bit difficult to translate without getting banned. I will try but I hope the mods accept that no offence is intended.
Use the phonic interpretation:
See = C
You = U
Hopefully you can work the rest out.
No offence intended.
Ah!
*Scales fall from eyes….*
Bit too subtle for me…
Moderator here. No offence taken
Bent bunch of (monosyllables), lol
The truth will out.
Cue more doubling down, fingers in the ears ‘lalalalalalalala’ shite from the usual suspects.
Dr. Malhotra writes: “Pharmacovigilance systems and real-world safety data, coupled with plausible mechanisms of harm, are deeply concerning, especially in relation to cardiovascular safety.”
It is surely not unreasonable to expect that people who work in the witch doctor industry will have done some research.
You should have done your job you pillock.
I have zero sympathy. Many DS members had realised that the gunk injections were dangerous from the off and doubtless like me had minimal medical / scientific knowledge but sufficient to avoid the crap.
An absolute idiot.
Of course there could be psychological factors too. I dare say the nudge unit knew their stuff.
Still, it was never under dispute that these gene therapy drugs were prescribed under emergency authority, and with exemption of liability for the companies producing them. People really do need to do their research and think about these things. To borrow a phrase, why don’t they teach logic in these schools?
Logic like common sense went out of the window a long time ago my friend.
I don’t think he’s an idiot. He was speaking out against vaccine mandates last year. Listen to the end of this interview.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPuEXWOcI6Q
Quite agree. He has a lot to say about the corruption going on within the industry plus the consequences of lifestyle factors and poor diet when it comes to health outcomes. He’s on our side and a valuable asset. If anybody has the guts to stick their head above the parapet and speak out about the pharma industry, state of the NHS and the state of our diets then they’re friend not foe and get my respect.
The jabs started to be rolled out in January 2021. Prior to that the Israeli Government had “volunteered” the Israeli nation to act as guinea pigs for Pfizer, in return for first supply of the jabs. Sometime in February (a few weeks before I was “offered” the jab according to my age/health profile) I saw an unofficial report from “dissident scientists” which warned that the Pfizer jab seemed to be linked to an increased risk of myocarditis in young men. As the mother of two sons around age 30, that was significant to me and I warned them.
So there has been evidence since February 2021 that the Pfizer jab causes myocarditis in some people, most commonly young men.
Anyone who did a bit of personal research KNEW that these jabs hadn’t been properly assessed for short-term adverse effects – and there was no data for medium to long-term risks. Yet almost the entire “scientific” and medical profession has stayed schtum for 18 months.
Whilst it is encouraging that Dr Malhotra is now speaking out it is far, far too late.
Yep, I remember reading about warnings from the Israeli military seeing increased myocarditis among its young men in March 2021.
But at least they had about 2 weeks or so reduced risk of being infected with a virus that in all likelihood would have caused no more than a cold in a young and fit male. (Reduced risk of infection being the best and only claim they had for this garbage at that time.)
Absolutely.
My decision to not have the injection was made before these things were even made available. I had done sufficient research to know they were dangerous and therefore cannot excuse any medics or scientists.
His dad died last year due to a cardiac arrest. Aseem blamed the fact the ambulance took too long to arrive but one does wonder ( which is kind of inevitable nowadays anyway ) if his dad was jabbed ( most likely, given he was very much immersed in the medical model and unlikely he was sceptical if his son, a cardiologist, took the jab early on ) had anything to do with it.
Absolutely I wrote to my Doctor (well the surgery as I haven’t a clue who my doctor is nowadays) back in autumn 2020 explaining exactly why I wouldn’t be taking any rushed “vaccine” and to inflict an experimental drug on a whole population without knowing about any long term side effects was madness. Of course it didn’t stop them from bombarding me with text messages imploring me to go and have their dangerous, nay murderous gene therapy treatment, which needles to say I ignored.
So did I, back in March ’21, however, the local surgery I’m registered with has not attempted to sell it to me. This was their reply: “Thank you for your letter addressed to Dr xxxxxx regarding the Covid-19 vaccination programme. We have noted in your records that for the time being you are declining the Covid-19 vaccination. This will prevent the surgery from contacting you to offer the vaccine when it becomes available locally.
If you change your mind at any time and decide to have the vaccine please let us know and we will update your records and put you back on the waiting list.
Chris Gebel (Mrs)
Managing Business Partner”
I don’t there was actually a “waiting list”, though. It was more like a typical sales operation – I think she accidentally used a typical term that applies to normal health care.
Don’t knock a serious attempt to put right what has been done wrong.
Dr Malhotra has been at the receiving end of grief from the Establishment for speaking out. (Just read Dr Malcolm Kendrick’s blog)
You have a point about evidence and research but the fact is that the testimony of public figures like this will carry far more weight than the squealings from the likes of us in our echo- chamber.
Just be thankful that things appear to be happening at last, and hold off with the ‘friendly’ fire.
It’s not that the evidence about effectiveness and harm has changed, it was there all along – it’s that they can no longer conceal the true evidence. It was clear from the start there had been no analysis of the raw data, as the only thing that appears to have been released just before the vaxx roll-out was pharma press releases. They have known all along the mrna vaxx was not a ‘normal’ product, they have known there was no long-term data, so none of the claims that there would be no long-term effects could ever have been considered evidence-based. Any fool could see that infection rates rose precipitously right after a new round of shots, that alone should have been a signal something was not right – the claim was after each shot you were not protected for a certain period of time, so an increase in infections right at a point of peak vulnerability can hardly be considered evidence of effectiveness. The coercion and pressure, the vaxxanazi pass and mandates were always a disgrace. Had health care professionals taken a united stance and stepped down from their positions rather than cooperate with such unethical and unlawful actions, a… Read more »
“Vaxxinazi” surely…
I must say though it would be nice if doctors still took the hippocratic oath seriously.
Incidentally, I understand that research suggesting that the “vaccines” in Israel caused lasting and serious injury are basically being ignored. A massive task to get governments to face up to what they have done to us. Seriously, are things worse for us now than in 1945? At least Dr. Mengele faced some sort of comeuppance.
The dictionary I consulted accepted both spellings 😉
It’s not that the evidence about effectiveness and harm has changed, it was there all along …
Yep, the BTL comments on this site were full of it from December 2020 on. The problems with this ‘vaccine’ were very obvious right from the start, to anyone who cared to look.
Whilst one may be glad that a few sinners are finally seeing the light, it’s bitterly frustrating that it took them so long. Put simply, it’s too late now. The damage is done and we must now wait on the consequences.
It’s never too late. Yes, a great deal of avoidable harm has already been done. But there is still a long road ahead and a long fight – it must be acknowledged loudly and clearly that the entire approach was wrong. Even if the vaxx had actually lived up to the hype and given people eternal life, no one should be forced into a medical procedure of any kind. Nor should anyone have been denied the option of using well-established, safe and effective alternative treatments, as long as they had been informed they were not deemed appropriate or recommended by the health authorities. If they still wished to use things like HCQ or invermectine, that should have been a matter for the individual and their doctor to decide, not some remote health authority under the control of the drug peddlers. There must also be greater support for those health care professionals who were put under pressure to ignore their better judgment, and better education for those who blindly followed “The $cience” and ignored vaxx injuries. There have been stories of doctors who refused to give people who had to get the vaxx to keep their jobs an exemption, even when… Read more »
Spot on.
There’s going to be so many layers of fence put up to contain this, starting with the minimal de-recommendation of the jab to the young. That alone might be enough to balance rising concern against fading memory as 2020 slips beneath the waves of the next f—- up.
At some point there’ll be a big anti-Pharma film made, like The Fugitive, maybe crossed with Independence Day, but I won’t hold my breath waiting for it.
Maybe the reckoning will come sooner if vax injury compensation payouts can be added to GDP.
Erin Brockovich type film based on Dr Peter McCullough, Dr Robert Malone, Dr Sucharit Bhakdi, Dr Mike Yeadon, Dr Tess Lawrie or another one of the heroes.
Maybe Raiders of the Lost Ark would be a good model: the power implications of the discovery are just too great and the only thing to be done is a cover up. But a couple of Pharma executives can get melted just before that happens. With India’s ivermectin record, I see it as a Bollywood production.
“Dr Aseem Malhotra … says that since the rollout of the vaccine the evidence of its effectiveness and true rates of adverse events has changed.”
No, nothing has changed, Dr! You’re just waking up!
Get yourself back to Good Morning Britain!
And also the DNA/adenovirus “vaccines” as well.
Anyone have a link to the source journal article?
These should work:
Read part 1 of the article: https://bit.ly/3dJuN3W
Read part 2 of the article: https://bit.ly/3dMKIhV
Now, there must be retribution for allowing greed and avarice to destroy fundamental medical ethics and integrity. It must rip through all the complicit institutions, the entire medical fraternity, regulators, journals, MSM, Governments. Big Pharma must be bled dry paying compensation for all deaths and injuries associated with this crime against humanity.
‘…one of the U.K.’s most eminent Consultant Cardiologists Dr. Aseem Malhotra…’ makes some interesting points.
“It cannot be said that the consent to receive these agents was fully informed, as is required ethically and legally.”
‘regrettable actions’ by ‘Authorities and sections of the medical profession have supported unethical, coercive and misinformed policies…’
Those concerns seem to be supported by some his colleagues and peers…but where were they, all these bastions of medical knowledge, when they were needed most, when plans were put in place for mass jabbing – mandatory in some instances – with a highly questionable and potentially dangerous pharmaceutical preparation with insufficient data?
“It will take a lot of time and effort to rebuild trust in these institutions…”
Very true. The ‘regrettable actions’ of those who should have known better has caused irreparable damage.
Trust – easily lost but almost impossible to regain.
I’ve always been “sceptical” when it comes to the medical profession. I will never have another vaccine as long as I live. And I intend to stay well away from the NHS unless it’s a life or death complication. It is completely corrupt …. and so are most of its employees, including the “sainted nurses” who have watched the stroke and heart attack patients being admitted and have said and done NOTHING about it.
Here’s a 20min presentation on the reproductive toxicology of Moderna and Pfizer by Sasha Latypova, who has an extensive ( 20+ years ) of working in the pharma industry in R&D. Remember how they urged pregnant women to get the jab because they were deemed high risk and they were assured it was safe? Well we know now that the mRNA does in fact incorporate into the DNA and antibodies pass from vaxxed mother to baby via the placenta, in rats the babies were born with skeletal malformations and the VAERS data show ( from earlier this year so it will be higher now ) the C19 injections caused 2570 spontaneous abortions since their inception compared to all other vaccines over the past 30 years. 😮 Going by all the evidence across the board it cannot be denied that their is definite malice and ill intent going on. If a product in the supermarket is found to be contaminated then the manufacturer would recall ALL of those products. If a drug or vaccine is shown to have killed 50 ( according to Peter McCullough ) people it is discontinued and pulled off the market. Now we have more deaths by… Read more »
*Edit; 2570 spontaneous abortions compared to 713 from ALL ( 98 ) other products. I’d be interested to see what the up to date stats are on this.
Thanks. I recall a mysterious spike in miscarriages in Scotland during September 2021. I just used Google to double check my memory. I was presented with a list of fact checks that vaccination isn’t associated with adverse events during pregnancy, which is strange because I didn’t include the word ‘vaccine’ in my search request. However, when I searched for midwife urges pregnant women in Scotland to get vaccinated during August 2021, that is top of the list followed by the CMO of Scotland urging the same thing at the same time.
VAERS data show 5,040 miscarriages up until Sept 16th. I think the data Sasha was quoting is from Feb, so this is a HUGE increase from 2570 in 7 months. And taking into consideration that VAERS is known to be significantly underreported on and it shows just one country’s adverse reporting system, god only knows what the true extent is. Just one of a multitude of safety signals ( the whole purpose of the reporting systems ) that continue to be ignored. Very sinister.
https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data
Mogs, I posted the charge of mass murder quite a while back and received a warning. Just saying…
What was the warning you received? 😮 Perhaps now more and more evidence has consistently emerged that it can no longer be denied or hidden.
I pointed out that the most senior member of the British government at the time of the mass jabbing could be guilty of….
The mods advised me to refrain and deleted the post.
“Errors in healthcare can provide an opportunity to improve.” Indeed; quite a few of us are survivors of incidents in which mistakes were made in all sorts of situations. One of the points worth noting is that they can get away with many things that would lead to conventional criminal action in other industries.
At least the authors seem to be trying to sort it out a bit in this case, and good luck to them. It suggests that those of us who took a precautionary view as to the alleged benefits compared with the (not well understood) risks of a novel product made a wise choice, notwithstanding the political campaigns in their favour.
Just been looking at this well worth a butcher’s.
https://rumble.com/v1lg05d-paul-marik-speaks-about-the-silencing-doctors-who-want-to-speak-out-about-t.html
Read the preliminary findings from the German Working group for Vaccine Analysis then tell me if you think this is safe to push on pregnant women and 6 month old babies. It’s just sickening what they are deliberately doing, frankly.
“Never in the history of science and medicine has anyone before dared to subject an entire population, an almost entire species, to a medical, not to mention a genetic, experiment. if this kind of experiment had been proposed for any other species it would most likely have been rejected with the explanation that it violated the principle of the Species Conservation.”
https://canadahealthalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/ee2cdead-884d-4ff8-9c09-5888f39345a2.pdf.pdf
I have come to the conclusion that the lies and manipulation of facts in this entire horror show won’t see the light of day until long after I’m dead….it doesn’t seem to matter what evidence or facts are forthcoming, the money men seem able to put the kibosh on it.
This is GB News from a couple of days ago…Yaffa Shir-Raz talking about the Pfizer side-effect cover up in Israel (from @25.40 onwards)…followed by our own Dr Will young……
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75HBYS-G4Iw
….and guess what?….Israel started its fifth booster campaign for everyone over 12 this week…..!?……WTF! ..doesn’t even come close anymore….
The Covid vaccine scam has long been fact-proof. Evidence is seemingly of little use and politicians have been conned and corrupted on a wholesale basis. Hopefully resistance may gather some momentum as the vaccine induced deaths pile up. However, it is probably already too late for most of the vaxxed and their premature death is already written in the cards.
I think that the best and most significant thing any regular Jo public can do now ( whilst the many scientists who aren’t captured are busying away continuing to highlight the evidence that totally contradicts the narrative and the harms the gene therapies are doing ) is to just stop getting jabbed. No more compliance with jabs will have a massive impact and send a message loud and clear to TPTB that we’re not playing ball any longer. Then there’s the lack of compliance needed with everything else, the restrictions, testing etc, but people need to stop getting jabbed and that should help to put this thing to bed once and for all, because it’s become crystal clear that this mRNA gene therapy is not going to get taken off the market. Not when there’s sinister and hugely unethical agendas ( not to mention mega profits to be made ) at play here. But as prize plonkers keep rolling up for continuous jabs they will keep being manufactured and pushed. Especially now with regards to the executive order Biden announced with promoting more biotechnology and programming biology now a definite focus, the future looks decidedly dodgy and unappealing to me… Read more »
I have been stating on here for months that the injections have been brewed to a recipe and for certain healing properties are not on the ingredients list.
A lot of the comments below are critical of Dr Malhotra for not realising the dangers of the mRNA shots earlier. I think he has been pretty brave in putting his head above the parapet and risking it being shot off by the GMC who have been investigating Doctors going against the “safe and effective” narrative. My experience, as an ex-GP who now works in sports medicine, is that my sceptical views on lockdowns, masks, suppression of early treatments and especially the experimental “vaccines” were treated with faint derision by many of my colleagues. Some of them are now realising that my point of view may have some merit after all as any but the blind can now see the huge downsides of all the aforementioned interventions! We should welcome with open arms each and every sinner who repents……
Agreed. As you are doctor who works in sports medicine, I would be interested in your views regarding the apparent large increase in deaths from heart problems in young athletes during the last couple of years. Do you think there is a causal link to the so-called COVID vaccines?
I have no direct experience of deaths in the sportsmen in my charge but no-one with their eyes open can deny the increase in young people dropping dead on and off sports fields.
Thanks for your reply. It is a shame there appears to be so many with their eyes closed.
To be perfectly cynical, sounds like politicians riding the wave of popularity by getting in front of the wave as far as possible. This is not leadership. Taking the Vax initially on TV when it was impossible to know the side effects was reckless. Many critical thinking Doctors were raising flags since the beginning going against the wave. Better late than never, I guess, but this doesn’t help the thousands or more who have had their lives destroyed unnecessarily by these reckless decisions.
Being about to enter my 70s in a generally healthy state, I am interested in evidence relating to the advisability of having the latest booster. The above paper suggests that there may be grounds for ‘older people’ having the vaccine, and this often seems to be a qualifying comment. But who does it mean? 70+? 80+? 60+ with certain health problems? Does the vaccine provide protection against serious illness overall for this age group which cancels out the risks it poses? I’m steadfastly deleting and binning all demands that I have the jab as I feel I don’t need it and I don’t trust it but maybe it’s partly a reaction to entering my 70s and I will regret the decision if I’m laid low this winter.
…and I think that there you have it!….we have all been so discombobulated that we are not sure what’s what. I would never advise anyone to have the vax or not, I believe you need to make-up your own mind… but I’m in the ‘over 60’s category and this is what I think…. I have never had a flu vaccine and never intend to…I have never, ever worried that I might get flu and die… Alpha variant, the ‘bad’ one has been gone a long time…and I’m not sure it was that bad anyway…for a 70 year old the IFR indicated that there was a 97% chance of survival…even if you were unlucky enough to get it really badly…remember even in the Alpha wave many many more elderly recovered than died…they just didn’t report that bit…. Omicron is literally a cold so I can’t imagine why anyone would think they need a jab for that!? It seems to me that there’s a much higher percentage risk of ruining your immune system, or, God forbid, having a vaccine adverse reaction….than dying from a cold, so I will hold out because that is right for me…. One of the things that I… Read more »
If this is any help, remember the IFR is at 0.15%. Stick to your guns. You have probably acquired immunity now in any case.
14,000 extra ambulance call-outs for cardiac arrests in England in 2021 is alarming. So too is the disappearance of ambulance Covid call-out data for the weeks following the 2021 booster rollout. Clearly, a policy decision was made regarding the recording of this crucial data. This presentation is enlightening:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/h2rjYETGpuIF/
I declined all mRNA and viral vector jabs, despite a lot of pressure from my local GP’s surgery. When they demanded to know why, I said in my view there could not have been sufficient testing to give long term safety data and until there was far more data and understanding of the effects, I did not want to have any jabs. To underline my point, I cited news that spike proteins were being found in organs where they were not supposed to be, without any explanation as to why. To me that showed any claim that the jabs had been fully tested and were safe was simply untrue. I was laughed off the phone. I caught Covid once and recovered after 9 days. Friends who have had all the jabs and boosters have caught Covid several times. Two have died unexpectedly, one aged 48 and one aged 54, without any previous chronic or acute illness. There has to be an independent and transparent public inquiry. If this shows any evidence that unexpected cardiac episodes and untimely deaths are unknown (or perhaps even concealed) side effects of the compounds being injected into people, after official assurances of safety, then there… Read more »