News Round-Up

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

28 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lockdown Sceptic
3 years ago

Parents’ horror over boy, three, sexually groomed by his school
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/parents-horror-over-boy-three-sexually-groomed-by-his-school/
Simon Caldwell

We need to stop this twisted world.

Even though the world is getting crazier each day, you can keep sane by doing 
Yellow Boards By The Road 

There are wolves and sheep. We are the sheep dogs.

Tuesday 20th September 11am to 12pm
Yellow Boards  
 Junction A329 London Road & Oak Avenue  
Near Oakingham Belle Pub 
Wokingham RG40 1LH

Thursday 22nd September 11am to 12pm
Yellow Boards 
Junction A30 London Rd & 
A325 Portsmouth Road  
Camberley GU15 3UZ

Friday 23rd September 11am to 12pm 
Yellow Boards 
 Junction Long Hill Road, New Forest Ride & 
A329 London Rd (near Mercedes Benz) 
Bracknell RG12 9FR

Stand in the Park Sundays 10.30am to 11.30am – make friends & keep sane 

Wokingham 
Howard Palmer Gardens Sturges Rd RG40 2HD   

Bracknell  
South Hill Park, Rear Lawn, RG12 7PA

b http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell

BurlingtonBertie
3 years ago

That article is truly depressing. Wales needs more than just the parents standing up for child safety.

transmissionofflame
3 years ago

Netherlands finally open to unvaxxed: Travelling to the Netherlands with proof of vaccination | Coronavirus Covid-19 | Government.nl

Travelling to the Netherlands with proof of vaccinationThe Dutch government has decided to lift the EU entry ban for the Netherlands as of 17 September 2022. Given the current epidemiological situation in the Netherlands, the government feels that for entry to the Netherlands the EU entry ban is no longer proportional. The European Commission is also planning to publish a proposal for revising the rules for entering the European Union (EU) in autumn 2022.
The government’s decision means that as of 17 September 2022, no COVID-19 related restrictions or requirements apply to travellers entering the Netherlands, including those from countries outside the EU/Schengen area.

Capecorona
Capecorona
3 years ago

We went in and out of Netherlands (Schipol) twice in June 22,from SA and UK. Nobody asked at any stage about our vaccine or test status. Seems like those tasked with enforcing ridiculous covid regulations have adopted a more pragmatic approach than their government. No mask issues either. Hospitality industry seemed very happy for our custom without mentioning passes.

TheGreenAcres
3 years ago

If we have cold winter in Europe that will just be used as more evidence of man made climate change.

If we have a mild winter in Europe that will be used as more evidence of man made climate change.

If we have a normal average winter in Europe, they will find a temperature sensor somewhere right next to an incinerator or airport runway and they will declare that one extraordinary reading represents evidence of…. man made climate change.

David101
3 years ago
Reply to  TheGreenAcres

I think you’re almost right. It’s more like:

Warmer winter = “Global Warming (TM)”
Colder winter = “Climate Change (TM)”
Normal winter = “Ignore the weather, look to the next crisis and be afraid, be VERY afraid!”

BTW, why is it all about man-made climate change? Do women get off the hook on this one?

AethelredTheReadier
AethelredTheReadier
3 years ago
Reply to  David101

Or…Normal winter = “the calm before the storm”…

David101
3 years ago

Yes, or “stay vigilant”!

ebygum
3 years ago

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/the-tale-of-the-doctor-with-the-broken

The tale of the doctor with the broken heartExpect to see a lot more sad, puzzled stories like this in the months to come.

A Y M
3 years ago

Awful article. No references. How many of these long term heart issues were in vaxed vs clean?
Yet another attempt to divert attribution.
Only one comment got through the censor on this and it was downvoted like crazy.

ellie-em
3 years ago
Reply to  A Y M

The Mail should aim for a balanced view and report on research into the impact of the jabs on the heart.

ellie-em
3 years ago

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/09/19/thank-god-elizabeth-ii-whose-reign-kept-tyranny-bay/

Kept tyranny at bay? I recall the queen helped – intentionally or otherwise – to promote it, with those famous words she said in February 2021, inferring people who declined the jabs were selfish.

‘“It is obviously difficult for people if they’ve never had a vaccine because they ought to think about other people rather than themselves.”’

AethelredTheReadier
AethelredTheReadier
3 years ago
Reply to  ellie-em

To be honest, I really don’t think those words were the Queen’s. She said them, yes, but at her age, I can imagine that she was advised what to say and told it was important.

BurlingtonBertie
3 years ago

She was reported to still be in full possession of her marbles & from her long experience, especially having lived through Nuremberg, & privy reading of red box contents that a blanket experimental medical intervention should never be coerced on the population she said she served.
Given the above, she should have upheld her Coronation Oath & refused. Instead she demonstrated total contempt for those she purported to serve.

AethelredTheReadier
AethelredTheReadier
3 years ago

I hear you, BB, but let’s be honest, none of us really knows what goes on in these circles, we’re not privy to the pressures or the means by which politicians get their way. I can imagine that she thought what she was saying was for the common good – yes we can shoot her down in retrospect and say she held us in contempt but from the evidence of all her service and duty (and what a dull and relentless job it must have been even with all the perks) that was not her way or intention. I’m no monarchist by the way, I’m just trying to be circumspect.

BurlingtonBertie
3 years ago

I hear you too. Irrespective of pressures, she failed in her duty & followed the same guff & narrative which is being pushed by her son & grandsons.
I’ve been down some constitutional rabbit holes & as she oversigned her coronation oath, she was able to not protect us as she did not undersign to any of what she was purported to have promised.
Her long & ‘dutiful’ reign was not dutiful to us, the people. If not, to whom was it dutiful? is a pertinent question

Mogwai
3 years ago

You both bring up good points. Personally I’m with Aethelred, just because I think I can cut a 90 odd year old woman some slack on this one because, as he says, who knows what clap trap she was being made to parrot from all of the politicians and advisors behind the scenes? I think she was easy to manipulate in her twilight years. Now imagine a scenario where the Queen actually said publicly that only people who were at high risk should consider coming forward for this injection? What sort of impact would it have had if the Queen had shown any sort of scepticism or took an independent approach and kept it all in perspective with her message to the population?

I don’t think one faux pas, due to her advanced age and reliance on the many agenda-driven useful idiots who would easily manipulate and use her as the ultimate mouth-piece to their own ends that she had surrounding her should negate 70 years of being a beloved and much-respected monarch to the UK and Commonwealth. I think her exceedingly long reign should be respected and not cancelled due to this particular blunder.

BurlingtonBertie
3 years ago
Reply to  Mogwai

The whole point of the constitutional monarchy is that the monarch is above politics, which is why a point blank refusal to do the bidding of government should have been made to prevent an over reach of political power.
It doesn’t matter the age of the incumbent, a constitutional line was crossed. Since when did the monarch pass judgement on medical matters??
I’ve never heard the monarch tell the nation that it is the moral duty of the citizens to have a flu jab.

Mogwai
3 years ago

I think she was just as manipulated and influenced by the epic PsyOp/fear porn as the general public were. And I agree that she never should have gone there. Best to keep shtum than get involved, but if she fell for the whole ‘killer virus’ narrative then I can see how even the Queen herself was duped. I was also pretty disgusted and disappointed with her comments, but all things considered, I think she was just a pawn, a very useful pawn, in the whole shit show. But I wish she’d stayed impartial and never gotten involved, which is how it should have been.

huxleypiggles
3 years ago

She said them. No forgiveness to anybody complicit.

NONE.

AethelredTheReadier
AethelredTheReadier
3 years ago

“That’s enough eco-propaganda, Sir David”… Even if Attenborough is right (which I am fairly sure he isn’t but who am I to say what is or isn’t true), the idea that humans can reverse these unimaginably enormous forces by rolling out a few million electric cars, putting up some wind turbines etc (well, we know that this is just nonsense) and more importantly by sending us back to the dark ages, will make any difference is just plain fantasy Hollywood Bruce Willis-saves-the-world territory. It’s like a sardine tasked with altering the course of a supertanker by nudging it. We are where we are and we must learn to adapt but not to destroy our lives and civilisations in the process. This is what we are being asked to do by Attenborough, Thunberg, Monbiot and all the other climate alarmists. Sneeze and it’s a climate emergency. Disappearing seahorses – climate change. Too many jellyfish – climate change. Too few jellyfish – yes, climate change. … All with the emotive high notes of violins pricking the eyes with tears as we watch the 6th great extinction in glorious technicolor. For me, the most important thing to tackle is environmental pollution – chemicals… Read more »

ebygum
3 years ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjG3VoX3Ldk

Dr John Campbell with an update on excess deaths in the UK and Europe…

terrifying….although the ‘average’ is 16%, many countries are showing much higher
excess deaths…

JohnK
3 years ago
Reply to  ebygum

I’ve been watching quite a few JC entries, including this one. Note what he says towards the end of that one about You Tube “censorship”. Maybe they are following the money, but he is being quite careful about his script and verbal output. However, a picture’s worth a thousand words, if you watch him speaking, along with his verbal intonation as well. Hopefully he will carry on for a while!

WyrdWoman
3 years ago
Reply to  JohnK

He’s already set up a channel on Rumble, just in case: https://rumble.com/v1hajzp-john-joins-rumble.html

Mogwai
3 years ago

A very thorough and interesting article looking at the outcomes of pregnancy and Covid. Includes a very large ( 12.4 million women ) S. Korean study with some findings that I wouldn’t have expected. Then it focuses on data from the UK, including a look at maternal deaths, which is pretty heart-rending to hear are as a result of lockdowns; lack of/sub-standard medical care, women killed by partners, suicides due to no access to mental health services. This article demonstrates that more women died as a result of the restrictions then from the virus itself, therefore it can be shown that the cure was way worse than the disease. So, what with the overwhelming evidence on harms to kids, I hope your new PM Truss stays true to her word this winter.

https://nzdsos.com/2022/09/20/outcome-of-covid-19-in-pregnancy/

Nobody2022
3 years ago

Pandemic Logic

Expert: I’m not saying there should be no viruses, all I’m saying is that nobody should ever get infected.

transmissionofflame
3 years ago

Paypal closes accounts of Free Speech Union and Daily Sceptic. Anyone who thinks the corporate world is neutral in this war is deluded: I’m writing to you because PayPal, the company that processes your membership payments, has decided to demonetise the Free Speech Union. That is, it has notified us that it is closing our account because we have violated its Acceptable Use Policy and won’t process any more payments. At exactly the same time, PayPal sent an identical notification to my personal account and the account of the Daily Sceptic, the pro-free speech news website I set up. So, all three PayPal accounts have now been shut down. I contacted a customer service agent to find out how, exactly, all three accounts have violated PayPal’s Acceptable Use Policy, but he could throw no light on the matter. I then submitted an appeal about the decisions to close the accounts, asking again how I’d violated the Policy, and they have not been successful. PayPal has still refused to say how the Free Speech Union violated its Policy. I can only assume the reason for the closure of the accounts is because PayPal disapproves of my efforts to uphold the right to… Read more »

BurlingtonBertie
3 years ago

This video has been removed from the usual social media platforms… Possibly getting too close to the truth…

https://gab.com/Robert55/posts/109029819094235304