What is Net Zero Costing You?

Telegraph Money has published an excellent feature today which reads like a submission to the review Chris Skidmore is carrying out on behalf of the Government into whether net zero is being met in an “economically efficient way” and will not place “undue burdens on businesses or consumers”. As Telegraph Money makes clear, it is already placing considerable burdens on businesses and consumers. Here is an extract, breaking down the burden in three different areas:

Home Insulation

Under the race to reach net zero, the Government has said it wants Britain’s housing stock to be much more energy efficient, but the burden of doing so has been laid squarely on property owners.

And as record-high energy bills eat away at household budgets, property buyers have become more discerning about “EPC” ratings.

Every property has an Energy Performance Certificate, ranging from A to G. Homes with a rating from A to C are considered to be energy efficient, while anything below is considered poor. The average rating for a British home is D.

Sellers are facing increasing pressure to invest their money into home upgrades in order to stay competitive. Vendors who have spent money to improve their EPC rating have pocketed 16pc extra on average when selling their home, according to research from the property website Rightmove.

But not all homeowners can afford the upgrades necessary to move up a band. Big upgrades such as insulation improvements cost thousands of pounds. For example, paying for foam insulation in cavity walls for a three-bedroom home would cost £1,200. This could save £285 a year in energy bills at current prices, but this means it would take at least four years to pay off.

Heat pumps are another source of frustration for many homeowners. The Government has committed to heat pumps as the replacement for gas boilers, with a target of 600,000 devices installed each year by 2028. By 2025, gas boilers will be banned from newly built homes, and by 2035 the Government wants to phase out all gas boiler installations.

However, the upfront costs of installing a heat pump versus the cost of installing a gas boiler has put many homeowners off.

Until 2025, homeowners who opt to install a heat pump will receive a £5,000 grant to do so as part of the Government’s Boiler Upgrade Scheme. But installation costs can be in excess of £10,000. Meanwhile gas boiler costs range from £1,000 to £4,000, according to Boiler Guide, a network of gas and heat pump engineers.

Running costs are not always cheaper for heat pumps, either. In June, the Climate Change Committee, an independent Government adviser on tackling climate change, estimated that the cost of running a heat pump was 10% higher than gas.

Petrol- and Diesel-Driven Cars

The Government push towards electric cars has also caused much tension, especially as charging infrastructure across the country is not yet extensive enough to support all drivers. Last year it announced that it would ban the sale of new petrol and diesel cars in 2030, forcing many drivers into expensive decisions.

The average cost of an electric vehicle is £43,896, compared with an overall average £23,185 for a medium-sized car, according to the price comparison website NimbleFins.

However, electric car owners could save money in the long run on petrol, the price for which has rocketed this year. The cost of charging will also be cheaper under Liz Truss’s plan to cap the cost of electricity units.

Energy Bills

Households are currently charged a green levy on energy bills which adds £150 to the average energy bill. The proceeds are used to fund renewable energy subsidy schemes.

Net Zero Watch, a campaign group that monitors the impact of decarbonisation, has estimated that the policy costs the British economy around £11 billion a year, adding a total £250 to the annual cost of living per household.

Liz Truss has pledged to cut the green levy out of energy bills, but it is not clear yet whether this will last beyond the next general election in 2024.

Worth reading in full.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Marcus Aurelius knew
3 years ago

“However, electric car owners could save money in the long run on petrol, the price for which has rocketed this year.”

Haha!

Of course, electricity just comes from the wall.

transmissionofflame
3 years ago

Indeed- electricity is clean and green and it doesn’t take much of it to run the Internet and the Cloud and all those server farms with petabytes of data and processors pumping out heat that need to be kept running and cooled that these green loonies are quite happy to use

NeilParkin
3 years ago

Bitcoin ‘mining’ around the world is said to consume as much energy as Spain…

Lancer
Lancer
3 years ago

Net Zero is about reducing consumption of hydrocarbons and therefore CO2, right? Given economic output and productivity is directly linked to hydrocarbons (so how much things cost due to the required resources & labour), how can something more expensive, so an EV that’s twice the price (because it’s MORE resource intensive) be good for reducing consumption and therefore overall CO2? I don’t get it. You could prob link the price / cost of something directly to CO2 output, I bet it’s essentially that’s simple – so in our effort to supposedly decelerate our impact on planet earth we are in fact accelerating it.

JohnK
3 years ago
Reply to  Lancer

Don’t forget that the term is “Net” not “absolute” Zero. Presumably it suggests that the affluent can use more, as long the rest go the other way?

Lancer
Lancer
3 years ago
Reply to  JohnK

Hmm, fair point. Of course I’m not naive to the grift but in that case.. ‘Net’ zero can only exist whilst there are other developing nations where we can ultimately hide the (ours really) hydrocarbon use and as a result claim our “Net Zero” status. Once they catch up the Net will have to change to Absolute I guess, but the affluent, as you describe, will have made their winnings (with everyone else on a strict diet of nothing).

ebygum
3 years ago

Besides the massive negative environmental effect of Lithium mining, as well as the horrendous toll on the people, many of whom we know are children..
…..according to this expert, there isn’t enough Lithium to make the number of cars they want anyway!
Perhaps it’s just as we think, only rich people will be able to run a car…the rest of us won’t need one while we freeze, starve, and are made grateful for our daily bowl of cockroach soup…
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-04-22/mr-lithiumalr-warns-there-s-not-enough-battery-metal-to-go-around?leadSource=uverify%20wall

JohnK
3 years ago

Not every older property has an EPC rating. I’m familiar with it which I dealt with when having some equipment installed at my place – some solar PV kit registered under the “Feed in Tariff” some years ago. It acquired a EPC rating – which became publicly available. The net effect of that was that I had an awful lot of junk calls from sales organisations, probably based in India (but not sure) for a while for things that are useless!

Back in 2014, I invested £5K cash on the new setup, which has turned out to be worthwhile financially, with interest rates being so low – especially as Day Rate import charges are so high now, so it’s just about paid for itself after 8 years.

Laicey
Laicey
3 years ago

Electric cars will cost more than you think. The battery life is only 10 years and will likely cost at least 30% of the purchase price to replace so will write the car off. So maybe £5000/year or more just on the capital cost of electric cars.

By comparison my 19 year old diesel averages 57mpg and it cost me £1500 4.5 years ago. Another £1000 in maintenance makes the capital cost nearer £500/year.

I might be emitting more dirty stuff but don’t drive much in cities. I very much doubt the rest of the equation favours electric cars environmentally.

It’s almost like electric cars are more of a money making scheme rather than something envonmentaly beneficial.

FrontalLobotomy
FrontalLobotomy
3 years ago

Government interference has totally corrupted the energy market. TOTALLY. I am averring from committing capital in any respect (heat-pumps, ev’s, insulation, domestic appliances) until a much clearer picture of the future emerges. I am not a gambler. A wooly jumper and electric blanket are an OK “investment”. £10K on a heat pump or £30k on an EV…. Nope! Do ministers seriously expect cognisant citizens to gamble their wealth on whimsical eco-gadgets?

NeilParkin
3 years ago

The problem I have with Heat Pumps and EV’s is that they are inferior to what they are replacing. If we take out the notion of ‘Emergency’, and let the market develop better solutions then I’m in favour, but why should we all be forced to buy the Betamax of cars or heating systems.

Cars in particular. The internal combustion engine has been made twice as fuel efficient and three times as efficient on CO2 over the last 30 year, and can be made better. All that investment, development and expertise is just being thrown away (not in China or India though). It makes no sense. None at all…

Martin Frost
Martin Frost
3 years ago

Years ago local councils offered partial grants for Home Insulation. Government should look to revive the initiative even if it has to be a loan scheme. With spiralling energy bills it surely makes sense. Can we afford it? Is tbat even an issue anymore. Just add it to the debt mountain created by the Covid panic and Ukraine War.

Covid-1984
Covid-1984
3 years ago

If ANY of this finds its way into a Conservative manifesto, then it will most certainly be the longest suicide note in history🙈