Both Tory Leadership Candidates Will Scrap ‘Legal But Harmful’ Clause in Online Safety Bill
Liz Truss and Rishi Sunak will get rid of Clause 13 of the Online Safety Bill, which requires the big social media companies to set out how they intend to address “priority content that is harmful to adults” in their Terms and Conditions, with Ofcom making sure they enforce those T&Cs. To be clear, this is not illegal content, but legal content that has been identified as harmful to adults by the Culture Secretary in a Statutory Instrument and which future Culture Secretaries would be free to add to. This is the most sinister clause in the Bill, so this is good news, although there are other clauses of the Bill which need to be either scrapped or amended as well. The Telegraph has more.
A planned crackdown on legal but harmful content online is set to be ditched amid freedom of speech fears by both Tory leadership candidates Rishi Sunak and Liz Truss.
They have pledged to introduce duty of care laws to protect children from online harms and adults from illegal content such as terrorism, drugs, weapons and suicide material as soon as possible.
But they are expected to scrap Clause 13 in the Online Safety Bill that aims to regulate legal but harmful content after Tory critics warned it could allow “woke” social media firms to remove offensive or controversial comments that they disagreed with.
It comes just a week after Baroness Kidron, an architect of the duty of care laws and new Children’s Code warned in the Telegraph that it was “deeply worrying” to try to regulate “legal but harmful” online content when there were already laws covering discrimination, sexism and hate speech.
A spokesman for Mr. Sunak, the former chancellor, said: “Rishi has spoken passionately as a dad about his desire to protect children online from content no parent would want their children to see – from violence, self harm and suicide to pornography.
“As Prime Minister he would urgently legislate to protect children. His concern with the bill as drafted is that it censors free speech amongst adults which he does not support.
“Rishi believes the Government has a duty to protect children and crack down on illegal behaviour, but should not infringe on legal and free speech.”
A source in Ms. Truss, the Foreign Secretary’s camp, said she would not scrap the Bill. “She thinks it needs to protect children from online harm, but we have to be careful to not damage freedom of speech for adults, ultimately,” said the source.
One of the leading figures in the criticism has been Lord Frost, the former Brexit minister, who has urged ministers to “take a fresh look” at the Online Safety Bill because of the threat to free speech.
Worth reading in full.
The Telegraph reckons it was the Telegraph wot won it, but I think the Free Speech Union, which has been highlighting the danger this Bill poses to free speech for over two years, deserves some credit. Our members and supporters have sent thousands of emails to MPs raising their concerns about the Bill using the email template on the FSU’s website. If you’d like to email your MP to share your concerns about the Bill, you can find our template here. Just enter your details and the email will automatically be sent to your MP. It only takes two minutes. Let’s keep the pressure up now we appear to be winning.
Stop Press: In last night’s GB News hustings, Liz Truss gave Alastair Stewart a “pledge” that she would amend the Online Safety Bill to make sure it doesn’t endanger free speech.
Stop Press 2: The lawyer Graham Smith published an excellent blog post two days ago in which he explains that the ‘legal but harmful’ clause is far from the biggest shortcoming of the Online Safety Bill.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
We’ll see. I don’t trust either of them. Something else will be going on in the background.
After the last 2.5 years these two should be facing life inside for treason. Who cares about their pathetic squabbling for Prime Minister? It’s a job in name only. Their only function is to take orders.
I C G A F.
Are we seeing a commitment to scrap #13 only because we’re in a leadership battle where the leaders are both responding to public pressure?
I hope that’s the case. I mean it would be nice if they had principles but it’s hazardous to rely on that. What we need is public pressure and scrutiny, sorely lacking during covid.
It still amazes me how the audience clap at these ‘statements’, as if they’re really going to happen. I read they were going to be quizzed about their commitment to the WEF but no one mentioned it.
I smell a rat.
Is the banging on about children just a way to drop the idea of.legal but harmful without appearing irresponsible, or is it just a tactical retreat bit keeping the thinnest of wedges in there to push more through at a later date?
In any case, Iam equally suspicious of the state’s passion for protecting children. That’s the job of parents and families.
I find that when then state says it wants to protect you it really wants something from you.
QQ – Who actually drafts these Bills, it won’t have been Dorris so where are these clauses coming from?
The Civil Service.
London bureaucrats.
Sadly, anything these two say is just going to be aimed at the party faithful for the next few weeks and then forgotten. The only way to get progress inGov and in this country is a complete change is Whitehall staff, mandarins, advisors – even the bloody cleaner! Far too many invested interests, woke beliefs, entitlement and wrong think in every tier of government from party activitist to the cabinet.
Neither of these will sort it out.
I do have a vote, and it’ll probably be Truss…but mainly because she’s less WEF than Sunak.
But it’s the best of the worst I’m afraid…
–
–
–
–
–
If you guys want to hear our latest podcast, then check it out and subscribe below:
Ep. 51 BANNED FROM TWITTER (Find out why)
We’ve been banned from Twitter for a week…find out why! Plus we talk Canada and Justin Trudeau, your first ‘Listener Rant’, Climate change madness, University PHD’s gone mad, Scotland’s gone crazy, The return of the Big Breakfast and MUCH MORE!
https://therealnormalpodcast.buzzsprout.com/1268768/11142910-ep-51-banned-from-twitter-find-out-why
Nope.
Just more
Words
Words
Words
Judge by actions past, present and future.
Life becomes easier when you understand that all governments are mafia – it’s just that some aren’t honest about it and some are even quite good at making the masses believe they are actually the good guys!
Les rois du monde vivent au sommet
The kings of the world live up on high
Ils ont la plus belle vue mais y a un mais –
They have the best view but there is a but –
Ils ne savent pas ce qu’on pense d’eux en bas
They don’t know what we down here think of them
Ils ne savent pas qu’ici c’est nous les rois!
They don’t know that down here we are the kings!
To state this again: We must protect children! is nothing but a pretext to introduce (or rather, extend yet more aggressively) general internet censorship as the age of internet users cannot be detemined over the internet (unless someone actually plans to introduce a mandatory global digital ID scheme). In spring 2021, the same entities who now claim to target only horrendous stuff like videos showing people who are copulating with each other instead of – the usual light entertainment stuff – killing each other, would doubtlessly have wanted to protect children from learning about COVID vaccination side effects or from seeing pictures of people without face coverings in public locations.