Do Masks Do Anything to Prevent Transmission of Influenza or Influenza-Like Viruses? Clinical Trials Show No Clear-Cut Effect
Professor Carl Heneghan and Dr Tom Jefferson have launched a Substack newsletter called ‘Trust the Evidence’. As regular readers of this site will know, they are two of the most authoritative sources when it comes to COVID-19, as well as other viruses. Unlike many medical doctors and public health scientists, they are strictly guided by the evidence and call it as they see it, regardless of whether it complements or contradicts the prevailing consensus. The article below was first published on their Substack account, which you can subscribe to here. The staff of the Daily Sceptic strongly encourages all our readers to subscribe.
Some of us started reviewing the evidence of the effects of physical interventions on the spread of viral respiratory infection two decades ago. The Cochrane review, now in its fourth update, concludes there is still uncertainty about the effects of face masks.
“Physical interventions” include hand washing, distancing, disinfection and barriers, including all types of masks.
SARS-CoV-2 had not been identified when we did the last update (published in November 2020), so we reviewed what physical interventions did to affect the spread of influenza and influenza-like illness. Most identify these two as “Flu”. We have already shown the lack of knowledge that accompanies this microbiological simplification.
Influenza-like illness is a syndrome made up of a constellation of signs and symptoms: fever, cough, runny nose, malaise, fatigue and so on, with which everyone is familiar. It is a multiagent syndrome caused by scores of known viruses (including seasonal coronaviruses) and many more which are unknown; Influenza (which cannot be distinguished clinically from the rest of influenza-like) illness is caused by two specific viruses (Influenza A and B) that can be diagnosed only after a laboratory test.
Before the pandemic, clinical trials in widely different settings and using different types of masks show no clear-cut effect against Influenza-like illnesses and influenza.
Although trials of medical/surgical masks are logistically challenging, the message is unequivocal: they do not appear to do much. Their effect on the broader community is unknown. These are broadly the same conclusions of the only two available randomised trials of masks conducted on COVID-19.
In previous versions of the Cochrane review, we included observational studies; some carried out after the 2003 SARs-1 epidemic. These lower quality studies showed an apparent effect, which higher quality studies failed to confirm. This is not an unusual situation that we find ourselves in Evidence-based medicine.
Who should you believe? Those that espouse low-quality evidence and its certainties or those rely on higher quality trial evidence – as we did in version 4 – with its inherent message of uncertainty.
The bottom line for evidence is to address the uncertainty. Throughout this pandemic, many seem to have had difficulty coping with uncertainties; they have jumped on any evidence that provides an element of certainty – at the time, this can feel reassuring. However, we have a tried and tested way of dealing with uncertainty in science: randomised trials.
It is a terrible indictment of the current leadership that no such trials have been planned or done, those which are on the stocks have had problems with funding and recruiting enough participants, and some researchers have been subjected to malicious personal attacks.
Any government “following the science” should have sponsored a range of trials testing different types and mixes of physical interventions in various populations and settings. They should have mandated genuine scientific efforts to diminish uncertainty. But politics, social media and the fatal attraction of spurious certainty underpinned by low-quality studies seem too much to overcome.
Dr. Carl Heneghan is the Oxford Professor of Evidence Based Medicine and Dr. Tom Jefferson is an epidemiologist based in Rome who works with Professor Heneghan on the Cochrane Collaboration.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Great article.
A good article. It supports my view, and is in line with the British Standards attitude to them in their published standards from mid 2020 (https://www.bsigroup.com/globalassets/localfiles/en-gb/product-certification/personal-safety/bsi-guide-for-personal-safety-equipment-0520.pdf ).
However, it is limited to the alleged efficacy of the junk on sale, and it appears that it causes a lot of useless waste as well. No doubt there is a psychological angle in it as well, including the misuse of false information, and bad education for the general public. Someone is making a profit from it.
And another issue is that many of the items on sale have tiny labels on the packaging which declare that they are not masks, or medical equipment at all, as they do comply with any CE standard etc. These are in such a small font that you need a magnifying glass to read it, but they are immune to prosecution under trading standards. If you buy junk without reading it, that’s up to you. The other item to note is that any *.gov site on this topic avoids the use of the term “mask” – they used the term “face cover” instead, which does not clash with any published standard.
Indeed. Anyone who genuinely believes that these “masks” stop covid needs psychiatric help.
And yet their use in hospitals and doctor’s surgeries persists… I have no idea how they justify this, and have never seen anyone attempt to do so but, I remain convinced that the lack of a recommended standard mask is evidence that the entire reason that we were ‘encouraged’ to wear them in the first place, was because someone in SAGE and BIT said: “We need some kind of identifier to easily see how many people are following the rules… ideas anyone?”
Have made an appointment to donate blood for the first time since 2020, when they didn’t want you to wear a mask so they were able to see if your lips were turning blue.
Don’t care whether they take my blood or not – they particularly asked for my blood type- (can’t understand the urge of some to collect badges and things) and will walk away if they insist on my wearing a mask, but not before I point out their reliance on pointless performative practices and voodoo science.
Last I checked a few weeks ago they were insisting that donors specifically wore a fabric face cover, no idea why! Needless to say that they won’t be getting a drop out of me until all the woowoo is thrown out.
They will get one visit from me as I haven’t been near anything resembling a medical facility since all this started (apart from a private physio who asked, but didn’t insist).
If I get any blowback I’ll delete my name from the website.
It depends what it is and what they are doing. There are proper products with CE labeling on them, e.g. It’s reasonable to wear things that protect the wearer, such as a dentist using the relevant tools etc, but it’s a waste of time when doing paperwork at the reception.
I’ve recently read through (parts of) the official German history of the first world war and the so-called Spanish flu is actually mentioned in them. Quoting from memory: Soldiers were also being incapitated by influenza. Presently, about 400,000 are still sick with it. Usually, they’re again fit for duty in 4 – 5 days and have completely recovered after a few weeks. The soldiers mentioned here refers to the western German field army of 1918, a little less than 5,000,000 malnourished people living in cramped and seriously unhygienic accomodations. And that’s the effect this most horrible of the horriblest killer diseases of the 20th century had under these circumstances: They’re usually again fit for duty in about a week. Considering this, it absolutely f***ing doesn’t matter if masks, social-distancing or reciting the alphabet backwards while standing on one’s head prevents the transmission of influenza-like illnesses. The people who believe this prevention is necessary have been living in cloud cuckoo land for over a 100 years and have created an uncountable amount of damage and suffering by their delusions. It’s time to tell them to shut up and get lost. The world doesn’t need your most surely well-intentioned mental exertions. Good… Read more »
Yes in some ways arguing that masks don’t work could be seen as playing into the hands of the covid loons – as could argoing that lockdowns don’t work, vaccines don’t work etc. The fact is that covid simply was never and is not important enough to merit any special attention at a societal level. Unless and until that truth is generally accepted, we are in danger of lurching into some further madness.
Ivor Cummins has a clip of Bill Gates claiming that “we” didn’t know Covid had low mortality rates and mainly affected the elderly.
Now the wheels are coming off the official narrative, they are going to claim it was all a mistake because “they didn’t know.”
Which is a lie since the British Government downgraded Covid to a Low Consequence Infectious Disease with low mortality rates BEFORE the first lockdown. And if the British Government knew that, the American one certainly did.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XMqRHihUbc
The usual gruesome claim about the so-called Spanish flu is that it killed load and loads of healthy young people. As per the quote above, this didn’t happen in Germany during the war. It may have happened in the USA, presumably because they were all stuffed into quarantine facilities where they then died of secondary, bacterial infections. But everybody else wore masks, so, this was ok then.
The sad reality (based on what I’ve found out so far) is that the pandemistas are a bunch of murderous maniacs who have been killing people through counterproductive medical measures since at least 1918. Considering that this was 104 years ago, it’s a safe bet that they’ll never learn any better but will seek to restart the mass killings at every opportunity. After failing in 2004 and 2009, they succeeded in 2020. They must not again.
NB: Words on the internet obviously won’t accomplish this.
And although it’s probably obvious as to why it was called “Spanish Flu”, we are again living in censor land.
It seems pretty obvious that if the kind of mask seen in the illustration worked, to any degree, against virus transmission, they would wear them in virology labs… they don’t.
I can’t believe we’re even entertaining this as a debate. Does tying a hankie over your car exhaust stop it from emitting fumes? And when it’s damp and dirty would you take it off and tie it over your face?