Civil Disobedience is Coming

Thomas Fazi, a journalist and author, has written a pessimistic essay for UnHerd predicting widespread social unrest in Britain this winter due to the cost of living crisis, which will likely be severe. Here is how it begins:

Britain may be recovering from a heatwave, but its politicians are already fearful that winter is coming. Only now, more than 170 days since the war broke out, are policymakers realising the potentially catastrophic implications of their gung-ho approach towards Russia.

Just last week, it was revealed that the UK government is preparing for a “reasonable worst-case scenario” over the winter in which below-average temperatures and gas shortages could force authorities to trigger emergency gas-saving measures, including organised blackouts for industry and even households. And this is as energy prices continue to spiral out of control: this winter, the average annual energy bill for a typical household is expected to reach £4,200, or about £350 a month – more than double what households are currently paying and a four-fold increase on the average bill paid just a year ago.

The social consequences would be nothing short of catastrophic, potentially pushing 10.5 million households — a third of the total — into poverty, exacerbating what is already the U.K.’s worst cost-of-living crisis in decades. Yet even when faced with a campaign of civil disobedience, calling on people to cancel their energy direct debits, the government hasn’t been able to come up with anything better than offering households a one-off £400 discount on their fuel bills in October (and a bit more for those on means-tested benefits). Downing Street’s “strategy” to get through the winter seems to be to hunker down and hope for the best.

For all the Brexiteer’s talk of “taking back control”, the post-Brexit political establishment doesn’t appear to be in control at all. They’re not alone, however. All European countries, to varying degrees, are facing the disastrous consequences of what will go down in history as one of the greatest political miscalculations ever – the idea that Europe could weaponise Russian gas supplies without shooting itself in the foot. As the social and economic costs continue to mount, several countries are now preparing for blackouts and energy rationing this winter.

And all European leaders, not to mention the technocrats in Brussels, after sleepwalking into this crisis, seem equally clueless about how to get out of this rut. France, for example, is usually considered less exposed due to its reliance on nuclear energy — and yet, incredibly, nuclear output this winter is expected to be 25% below that of a normal year, due to maintenance and repairs taking longer than expected.

Overall, the entire European political class is proving to be catastrophically ill-equipped to deal with the increasingly complex, interdependent and crisis-ridden reality of our 21st-century world. Indeed, manufacturing new crises, or worsening existing ones, seems to be what they do best. What we need is knowledge, vision, wisdom, and self-restraint — in short, a forward-thinking politics geared towards improving the material and spiritual lives of everyone, including those yet to be born. Instead, what we have is short-termism, ignorance, arrogance, mediocrity, and self-interest – a politics completely divorced from the needs and interests of the majority of citizens.

The author goes a bit off the rails towards the end of this essay, calling for the state to bring energy suppliers back into public ownership, allowing the authorities to control energy prices, as if there will be plenty of affordable energy to go around if only prices are capped and ignoring the fact that the reason we’re so short of fuel is because of insane environmentalist utopianism (see Jordan Peterson’s recent essay).

Nevertheless, it’s well worth reading in full.

Stop Press: Daily Sceptic contributor Philip Pilkington has written a piece for UnHerd pointing out that Britain’s current trade deficit is nothing to do with Brexit.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

43 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
DickieA
DickieA
3 years ago

Typo in the opening line. It’s Thomas Fazi (not Farzi)

Lockdown Sceptic
3 years ago
Reply to  DickieA

Stasi?

JohnK
3 years ago
Reply to  DickieA

Perhaps he typed the name of a certain café of that name in London? Look it up.

RW
RW
3 years ago

There’s nothing wrong with nationalization of natural monopolies and a real lot is wrong with privatising them: The energy and water companies de facto don’t operate in a competitive market where they’re forced to rationalize and innovate. They own the rights to certain sets of revenue-generating serfs they can more-or-less abuse to their hearts content. They’re behemoths which are exactly as bloated, negligent and incompetent as the civil service is often said to be. The only difference is that any money they make goes directly into private pockets (and the cost of business failure, in case it happens, is inevitably paid by the tax payer).

EppingBlogger
3 years ago
Reply to  RW

Energy supply is not a natural monopoly and private businesses adequately controlled, mainly for monopoly practices that politicians seem generally to ignore, is better by far than nationalised ones. I suspect you may not be old enough to remeember just how miserable and badly run they were before Mrs Thatcher started privatising them. Don’t blame her for the failures some of them have become.

JohnK
3 years ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

Supply might not be a monopoly, but distribution is. How many District Network Operators (DNOs – for electricity) or gas pipeline operators are there in your area? One for each type. Although there are several firms that use it, they can’t do their own thing – they all use the same cable & pipeline.

RW
RW
3 years ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

I’ve been living in Germany before utilities became so-called private enterprises. In Germany, it’s also still common (or used to be still common when I still lived there, ie until the end of November 2010) for larger muncipalities to run their own power generation facilities. And – imagine that – in Germany, it’s also still responsbility of the suppliers to do meter readings instead of just sending entirely made-up bills (of the kind I get several times per year as the meter for the flat I’m living in is locked away from me in a communal area — unfortunately, that’s nobody’s problem but my own. A very British situation: Everything’s f***ed up but nobody is responsible for that).

Britain may have been badly run in the 1970s. But this would be a British problem and not one inherently related to state control of anything.

Monro
3 years ago
Reply to  RW

State control of anything is a major problem.

‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help’

The British Army used to have a quasi privatised Regimental system for precisely that reason.

Whether it still does is a moot point.

RW
RW
3 years ago
Reply to  Monro

The British army used to have a quasi-privatized regimental system because officer commissions were being sold to whoever was willing to pay for them. Due to lacklustre results, this was abandoned after the Crimean war.

Monro
3 years ago
Reply to  RW

At the time of the sale of commissions, recruited soldiers were not recruited for specific regiments.

The Cardwell reforms changed all that.

The strength of the post Cardwell regimental system was its created link to counties.

Through local regiment orientated recruitment, strong local, often family, links to particular regiments made for intense loyalty, esprit and, consequently, independence of thought, action, rarely found in other military or state institutions.

Most elements of the public sector would do well to emulate that system in some way.

Instead the British Army has watered down that system with increasingly centralized control.

Once gone, the regimental system and, with it, the quality of the British Army itself, will not easily be recovered.

JXB
JXB
3 years ago
Reply to  RW

Says someone who has never lived with nationalised industries – but clue: NHS. “The energy and water companies de facto don’t operate in a competitive market where they’re forced to rationalize and innovate.” That’s true because of Government intervention, with regulation, subsidies, price caps, windfall taxes. The utilities were private and were nationalised in the late 1940s by our new Socialist Government. If being under State ownership was so good, why were they all run down, inefficient and their prices to consumers so high and services so poor? The energy market has scores of companies in it, so to say it’s not competitive is not consistent with reality – nor is energy a natural monopoly. And if you think Government is going to be innovative and rationalise – well NHS – and you haven’t been paying proper attention your whole life. Few things are natural monopolies, water supply/sewage being one. But why ever would you imagine Government could make a better job than private enterprise? State run anything is cut off from private capital and must rely on capitalisation out of taxation or debt. There is no profit motive, no incentive to attract new investors, no incentive to be efficient… Read more »

JohnK
3 years ago
Reply to  JXB

And power distribution for electricity and gas is a natural monopoly (unless you use liquified petroleum gas). There is only one cable and gas pipe in your street for distribution. Regarding the NHS, it is actually semi-nationalised, in as much as it allows certain specialists to work on both sides, with some of their time for them, and the rest for other firms. Often there are private hospitals just around the corner. My dentist does both in the same building.

Monro
3 years ago
Reply to  JohnK

The NHS is nationalised, run by the state.

Specialists, private practices, contract with the state run NHS.

The IEA paper ‘Universal Healthcare without the NHS’ puts healthcare in this country in its proper perspective.

‘In terms of outcomes, quality and efficiency, social health insurance systems are consistently ahead of the NHS on almost every available measure. They combine the universality of a public system with the consumer sovereignty, the pluralism, the competitiveness and the innovativeness of a market system.’

RW
RW
3 years ago
Reply to  JXB

The energy market has scores of companies in it, so to say it’s not competitive is not consistent with reality

I’m contractually prohibited from changing the enery supplier of the flat I’m renting (standard rent contract clause). Even if this was different, I wouldn’t ever dare to risk that as the likely outcome is me being without power for an indeterminate time and with no chance of redress beyond hope & pray.

In contrast to this, whoever presently supplies energy to this flat is free to sell my contract to the highest bidder at his discretion (recently happened).

A competitive market is one where customers can easily buy something from multiple suppliers, not one where customers contracts can easily be sold among multitude of service providers.

Nicholas Britton
3 years ago

Nationalising the energy companies is most certainly not the answer. It is not the suppliers who are creaming off the bulk of the profits anyway. Also, it would mean putting our energy supplies in the hands of the same political reprobates that got us into this mess in the first place. The law of supply and demand is a basic tenet of economics. There needs to be an increase in energy supply. To do this, we first need to ditch the net zero madness, immediately. We should look at rebuilding gas storage depots, importing as much gas and oil as we can, and start fracking. Maybe also bring a few old coal-fired stations back online (if we still have any). We should also stop selling energy to the EU. None of those things will impact this coming winter to any significant degree. This winter is going to be tough and some cash handouts may be needed just to prevent deaths from hypothermia, but we should at least start heading in the right direction. The political elites have shown themselves to be contemptuous of ordinary working people at best. At worst they have declared war on us. If some of them… Read more »

RW
RW
3 years ago

The exact same kind of political reprobates very likely control them already, just with a nominally different employer. If they’ve invaded larger banks to a sufficient degree that they’re empowered to abuse paying customers guilty of wrongthink about human biology, they’re certainly also working for the even less competitive utility companies.

Sceptical Steve
Sceptical Steve
3 years ago

Sadly, one of the scandals of the past 20 years has been the politicians’ enthusiasm for dynamiting coal-fired power stations, thereby making certain that their pledges to reduce fossil fuel use can’t be overturned.(From my house here in Wakefield, I used to be able to see 4 substantial coal-fired stations. Now, the only one to survive is Drax, heavily subsidised to burn “renewabls” imported from the US at huge expense.)

huxleypiggles
3 years ago

Thank goodness for a bit of commonsense.

RTSC
RTSC
3 years ago

Absolutely correct. But you missed out one vital issue ….. they are going to have to tell Zelensky to negotiate a peace with Putin. And if he says no, then explain that we won’t be supplying him with any more weapons.

BurlingtonBertie
3 years ago

Remove all fuel taxes & hey presto! No need for expensive government handouts.
Without the handouts the control of the masses is far more difficult so won’t be done.

JohnK
3 years ago

You would have thought that this should be possible now. When we were in the EU, it was essential to charge VAT on domestic supply, with a minimum of 5% (which is what we pay), but it ought to be possible to scrap it now – an automatic tax cut. 

JXB
JXB
3 years ago

Good! That’s what the dummies need – no heat, no light, no food then perhaps the population will stop putting up with the evil cretins in charge, and the climate loons, and veganistas, and intrusion into our daily lives by all the busybodies and realise we can’t carry on believing we are all entitled to live off each other, and living in fear of the next doom.

Uncle Monty
3 years ago

Covid was the smokescreen to usher in the @WEF Fourth Industrial Revolution. Central Banks printed €$¥£billions to deliberately create inflation and devalue the purchasing power of our incomes. Food shortages are deliberate policy, see Ukraine and Net Zero re-wilding and the solar panelling of farm land. Energy shortages are deliberate, Net Zero targets used as justification to close North Sea gas fields and for the refusal of planning applications for Lancashire fracking. The closure of coal fired power stations, the glacial pace of replacing and building new nuclear power stations, all ostensibly to save the planet, will result in their desired outcome to make people cold and miserable. A hungry, cold, impoverished populace will be encouraged to riot and in the wake of the ensuing chaos they will BEG their government for salvation. The salvation will come in the forms of: Debt forgiveness in exchange for the deeds of your home. A new shiny Central Bank Digital Currency – sold to you as being safe, secure and convenient. Digital ID to avoid ‘fraud’. Social Credit Scoring – linked to your tracked digital purchases. Less meat, less diesel = good boy tokens. Criticism of the narrative on Twitter = dog house,… Read more »

huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  Uncle Monty

Blimey. I was beginning to think I was on my own. Your explanation cannot be bettered. That is the deal. All this has been planned. The only reason this country will face food shortages is because they have been planned for. “Re-wilding?” Re-wilding is Reset talk, Orwell speak and simply means taking land out of food production. I have been working on a field today that has been left to go back to the wild – it’s now full of bloody weeds and will cost a few thou just to bring it back to commercial use. There has been no national food policy in this country since WWII. The unofficial policy now is to make farming very difficult with the aim of starving populations. Netherlands anyone? We are chock full of fuel; four hundred plus years of coal beneath our feet, oil, natural gas and God knows how much shale gas. Unlimited electricity if they built the nuclear stations. Uncle Monty has nailed it. Every current crisis has been manufactured and anybody thinking otherwise is living in la la land. I will not go on but people need to heed the words of Neil Oliver: It’s not always about what… Read more »

BurlingtonBertie
3 years ago
Reply to  Uncle Monty

John O’Looney had a meeting last autumn with Sir Graham Brady. The establishment is ready for & fully anticipating a violent backlash. They know how to crush that. What they struggle to crush is civil peaceful disobedience & communities solving problems at a local level without recourse to top down solutions.

The old bat
3 years ago
Reply to  Uncle Monty

Perhaps we won’t ‘beg for salvation’ because we have seen how useless our government is. Perhaps we will take over by force and install the government we want. Whatever happens, we must stop thinking we are helpless. If it takes a few battles, so be it. I don’t think civil war in the states is out of the question, perhaps we could have that here as well. I think you can only push the population so far and they will turn. People who have nothing to lose can be very dangerous. We are going to get to that point this winter. Oh, and by the way, let me be the first to say, but Christmas is cancelled again.

huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  The old bat

There will be no cancelled ANYTHING in this house. They can F. right off.

Lockdown Sceptic
3 years ago

Sadly, since January not enough people have been protesting. We go out 3 times a week, but most of the people who used join don’t come anymore.

Back Off, Oh Masters of the Universe
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=–QS_UyW2SY

Globalist utopians demand that we fall in line with their “cure” for climate change. Dr Jordan B Peterson explains why the goal of achieving net zero emissions by 2050 is absolutely preposterous.
Jordan B Peterson

 Yellow Boards By The Road 
BUILD BACK FREEDOM … From Lockdowns to Digital Gulags 

Wednesday 17th August 12pm to 1pm 
Yellow Boards   
Junction A332 Windsor Rd &
A330 Winkfield Road, 
Ascot SL5 7UL

Friday 19th August 11am to 12pm  
Yellow Boards 
A3095 Foresters Way &
B3430 Nile Mile Ride  
Bracknell RG40 3DR

Stand in the Park Sundays 10.30am to 11.30am – make friends & keep sane 

Wokingham 
Howard Palmer Gardens Sturges Rd RG40 2HD   

Bracknell  
South Hill Park, Rear Lawn, RG12 7PA

Telegram http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell

Mogwai
3 years ago

I commend your efforts but people are noticing that protests don’t make any difference. If people hit the streets en masse that’d be different, you can’t help but make an impact. But I think 3X/wk, a handful of people, isn’t going to do squat. No doubt more restrictions are on their way so I’d wait and join any biggies set up by the larger organizations. The fewer people the easier to ignore. The protests in their thousands? MSM may not cover it but its pretty hard for anyone to ignore 30,000+ people hitting the streets of a city, and alternative platforms will cover it.

Yes TPTB can ignore even 1 million folk out protesting but there’s a difference between “ignoring” and being “unaware” and they cannot fail to be aware of 10s of thousands of like-minded peeps airing their views and making their opposition known. Save your time and energy for the big ones.

Sforzesca
Sforzesca
3 years ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Every little bit helps.
Just like – as someone else said, a stonemason who keeps hammering away at a huge rock – with no effect, and then, on say the 151st strike, it cracks.
But, it wasn’t the 151st strike that did it – it was the cumulative effect of all the others.
We’ve just got to keep hammering….

RTSC
RTSC
3 years ago

Our SItP only has 4 – 5 people attending regularly on a Sunday morning now, but the community is still connected and actively preparing for winter.

EppingBlogger
3 years ago

The politicians will spin it that the Russia – Ukraine war is the cause whereas the real cause is Net Zero policies and a failure to ensure reliable energy.

Sforzesca
Sforzesca
3 years ago

I’m staggered.
Who’d have thought poking the Bear would lead to problems with energy supplies.
Is it just incompetence – or planned just to create chaos to enable the elite to – “Build back better”?
If there is any justice left in Clown World one or two of the bastards may be taking a close look at lamp posts…..

A Y M
3 years ago

Yeah yeah they are soo incompetent.

Apparently this author snd Toby are willing to stretch the cock up theory of leadership so far that we are effectively led by morons that’s should barely be able to speak.

Sorry but it’s so obviously meant to lead to a crisis across multiple fronts.

Its a plan, they’ve spoken about it, they are telegraphing it and they are orchestrating it.

Im getting more frustrated by the cuck apologists now than the Cabal themselves.

amanuensis
3 years ago

It is probably too late to sort out our energy mess. I guess we can just get cold this winter (wear a jumper).

The really big problem to come will be the risk of disruption in the supply of ‘stuff’ when China invades Taiwan. This includes just about every manufactured good, including ‘stuff’ made overseas that includes critical components only made in China and parts used in the manufacturing and supply chains.

A Y M
3 years ago
Reply to  amanuensis

Good times

RW
RW
3 years ago
Reply to  amanuensis

It is probably too late to sort out our energy mess. I guess we can just get cold this winter (wear a jumper).

This statement makes it plainly obvious that you haven’t ever spent a longer time in a room without adequate heating in winter. As practical tip from someone who has (for more years than I’d care to have had): You’ll especially need to keep your feet warm as they’re otherwise going to start to hurt quite badly after a few hours. Putting them onto folded blanket and wrapping your body waist-down into another sort-of works. Nevertheless, it’s a good idea to spend the last 1 – 2 hours of each day with a long walk to get warm again. Provided a sufficient amount of blankets is available (4 – 5), no additonal heating is needed while sleeping.

Monro
3 years ago

Civil disobedience is not coming.

It is already here: unionised national strikes, nutty environmental obstructionism/vandalism, feral bicyclists, the widespread ingestion of illegal and harmful chemicals and so on.

But, nevertheless, if you had to choose when to be alive/a ticket in the lottery of life……?

JohnMcCarthy
JohnMcCarthy
3 years ago
Pilla
Pilla
3 years ago

With regard to the widespread social unrest that Thomas Farzi foresees, this sentence from an article by Niall McCrae in TCW yesterday seems apt: ‘As seen in Sri Lanka, depriving the people of petrol (problem) caused riots (reaction), leading to acceptance of rationing by digital identity system (solution).’ However, the Problem/Reaction/Solution scenario in this country would have its own variations, eg food shortages/famine (problem) – riots (reaction) – anything from digital ID to intervention by the military (solution). Beware!

@yorkshirekate
@yorkshirekate
3 years ago

‘Civil disobedience’ caught my eye because I’ve been wondering why it’s not already been happening, not in relation to the energy crisis (yet) but with regard to the many failures of our police force, to a parliammentary body which doesn’t prioritise the electorate, and to our open borders which facilitate the incoming of thousands of illegal immigrants in a seemingly never ending stream and for whom the tax payer foots the bill. Frankly, I’m about ready to form the first local militia.

Roy Everett
3 years ago
marebobowl
marebobowl
3 years ago

It won’t be pretty but this has all been written into the great reset plan.. fasten your seatbelts folks, it is going to be a wild ride.