Large German Insurer Reports Staggering Rise in Adverse Effects from COVID-19 Vaccines
According to a response to an official request for information from the German Techniker Krankenkasse insurer, the number of billed cases of vaccine-related adverse effects needing medical treatment skyrocketed in 2021 compared with 2019 and 2020. The request relates to four diagnostic codes:
- T.88.0: Infection following immunisation
- T.88.1: Other complications after immunisation
- U.12.9: Adverse effects after Covid-19 immunisation
- Y.59.9: Complications due to vaccines or biological substances
In 2019, the total number of confirmed diagnoses was 13,777. In 2020 it was 15,044. In 2021 the total number was 437,593. This is more than thirty-fold the average for those four codes in 2019-2020, a 2,937% increase.
More precisely, it is the T.88.1 – Other complications after immunization, and U.12.9 – Adverse effects after Covid-19 immunization – that are spiking. The latter code of course has no data for the prior years, but close to 150 thousand incidences in 2021.
Approximately 11 million people are insured by the Techniker Krankenkasse. 473,593 cases of medical treatment resulting from vaccination thus amounts to around one in every 23 people vaccinated, assuming all 11 million are vaccinated. The rate for 2019 and 2020 is one in every 760 people.
The vaccination effort against COVID-19 is unprecedented in its scale and thus a rise in the number of adverse effects is to be expected. But what should be expected? We can try to correct for the difference in scale to compare the COVID-19 vaccination effort with vaccination for other diseases. As the German total numbers are not easy to come by, we approximate this by using worldwide estimates. In 2017, the WHO estimates 2.7 billion vaccine doses were administered worldwide. In 2021, 57.7% of the world’s population had received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine, which amounts to about 4.55 billion people. From this we can conclude the number of persons vaccinated against COVID-19 last year was about 1.7 times the number otherwise vaccinated against other diseases. Thus, assuming the number of people vaccinated against other diseases stayed the same, the number vaccinated in total against any disease in 2021 was 2.7 times the earlier number. Correcting for this difference we get an eleven-fold increase in adverse effects needing medical treatment. This is a rough estimate, but gives us some idea of the actual rate.
Last February, a board member of another German insurance company, BKK Provita, Andreas Schöfbeck, informed the Paul Ehrlich Institute of a tenfold rise in the incidence rate of adverse effects among the company‘s clients, due to the COVID-19 vaccines. Schöfbeck was promptly fired from the company after his disclosure.
The US VAERS database shows a 35-fold increase in reported vaccine-related deaths in 2021 compared with 2019. In 2021, Iceland saw a 160-fold increase in reports of all adverse effects from vaccination compared with 2019. In July of this year, the Icelandic National Health Insurance had received 40 applications for damages resulting from COVID-19 vaccination, approximately one for every 8,000 people vaccinated.
Recent studies of excess mortality and adverse effects indicate the mRNA vaccines especially provide limited if any benefit. Dr. Martin Kulldorff, former professor at Harvard Medical School, member of the Food and Drug Administration’s Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee and a former member of the Vaccine Safety Subgroup of the Centers for Disease Control’s Advisory Committee on Immunisation Practices, concluded in an article last July that the benefits for working age people were unclear and that the elderly only “may benefit“ from being vaccinated.
The new German numbers only add to already rising concerns regarding the COVID-19 vaccines. Especially with the now prevalent and much milder Omicron variant, the data indicate that vaccination may increase infection and hospitalisation rates rather than reducing them and produces a rise in all-cause mortality. In light of this, continuing to inject younger people is highly irresponsible, if not criminal. And now, a few weeks after Danish health authorities banned the vaccination of children below the age of 18, new Thai research indicates as many as one in three teenagers suffer from heart-related problems following mRNA vaccination.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Morning all 😘
These adverse events are all just “coincidence”.
Ticking time bomb for the globalists.
Bloody ticking time-bombs for all those who have been stabbed.
Twelve months from now situations could be extremely unpleasant. At some point the Joe Publics everywhere are going to wake up.
I think they are counting on the masses being distracted by their inability to pay for or find energy and food. Perhaps looting and crime will distract sheep from their neighbours dropping dead from cancer snd heart attacks.
War with Iran anyone?
So many distractions so little time…
‘These people are just chasing compensation, egged on by ambulance-chasing insurers. Opportunists, the lot of ’em! There is nothing wrong with the 100% Safe and Effective Vaccines. These people are scum. And think, in the middle of a pandemic! Lowest of the low.’
Do you know anyone who would explain it this way? I do!
Soon, the “fully vaccinated” won’t be able to get any insurance. The insurers just need to establish a definition for “fully vaccinated”.
A young man from my life insurance broker called me just before Christmas, asking if I wanted to review my policies.
I didn’t, as it happens, but I did want the opportunity to quiz him on vaccinations. At the time, it turned out L&G were offering a discounted price to the vaccinated (ha! Fools!), and none of them were anticipating higher death rates in the vaccinated. Bear in mind we’d already had the info from US group life insurers that people were dying at a higher rate since vaccine mandates came in in the US.
I wonder how things stand now?
He was a young chap and into football so I think I managed to alarm him slightly with the FIFA death stats. Hopefully he’s not been lured by any booster madness.
What you say indicates how really most people and businesses had truly fallen for the hype hook line and sinker. Insurance companies would not hand out discounts that in essence encouraged someone to do something that would, in reality, raise the insurance company’s risks.
A cynic could say the insurance company would have an exclusion clause for people taking an experimental vaxx, but I don’t think that, partly because I doubt a discount encouraging you to take the vaxx while excluding liability for the same vaxx would fly in court, but also because I believe the insurance companies are filled with people just like the doctors and health care workers who just swallowed what was fed to them without question. But if there were anyone I would have expected to be on their game, it would have been insurance companies.
You’d think other vaccine developers would also not be fooled. The company I worked for was also working on mRNA programmes (actually saRNA), but they kept abandoning the stuff they were working on as “wasn’t ready for prime time” (ie too dangerous). Same with the adenovirus programmes as well. Stopped the lot of them before Phase 1/2 studies. Not safe.
When Pfizer and Moderna came out with their “safe and effective” data, you’d think that might have raised a few eyebrows and some scepticism, but NO. Instead the vaccine R&D guys just got yelled at by management…”how come they managed it so fast and you guys did nothing?”, and then they all went and got the jabs. F@cking morons, the lot of them. So glad I left.
Amazing what “exempt from liability” can do. I really hope these crooks do get “thrown under the bus”.
Didn’t Goebbels have something to say about telling a big lie often enough? Plus ca change. Many are still fools, the elite still lie.
It seems the third dose is really the Rubicon for most people. Thus, I propose that anyone who has had two or fewer doses, and gone at least a year without any further doses, be considered “born-again unvaccinated” for such purposes.
Being an impatient person by nature, I read these sort of articles and become incredibly frustrated at the prospect that nothing will come of it because so much evidence like it has been presented and still there are mandates for jabs and restrictions for the unjabbed around the world.
Then I remind myself of this quote which probably enshrines the spirit of the DS and of the many independent journalists, scientists, activists. Thanks to all of them for chipping away.
Thank you. I feel the same.
See also, cracks in dams and that famous quote (can’t remember who said it) about bankruptcy (happens slowly and then very quickly)
chris Martensen talks about it as “when private knowledge becomes public knowledge”, like with Harvey Weinstein and his sex crimes. We are at the stage where a lot of people know the truth, but it’s unacceptable (STILL, inexplicably) to say it in public. We need a catalyst (like Rose McGowan) to blow the lid.
Part of the reason is, undoubtedly, that so many people do not want to think what they injected themselves with, or their children, or maybe the elderly relatives they persuaded to take this stuff. It also means questioning long-held trust in authorities in general and health care providers in particular. But it will happen. Which is why I’m astonished that countries like Denmark and NL are still going ahead with an autumn jabfest. I’m curious to see how many people take it up, I suspect a vast majority of people under 50 won’t go near it. Tracking who gets infected, how soon after the jab and who gets very ill, despite being quintuple-vaxxed will get a lot easier.
“Questioning long-held trust” may lead to loss of reputation, and undermining the proper justification of the activities of certain professions, which could have a negative effect on us all – or maybe not, if it turns out that we’re better off without some branches of it. I suspect that the overall effect will be negative, though.
I agree, I think the overall effect will be negative. This doesn’t mean I have a particularly high trust in the authorities as such – at the end of the day, it is people who make decisions and policies and people are – people. I would say on a personal level I’m fairly libertarian, but if you live in a densely populated society, humans themselves will seek to establish some type of hierarchical structure and rules and order, one way or another. That is what makes this so frustrating. Imperfect as they may be, the societies of the Western world have been a pretty good place to live for all my life (56). The idea that this is being thrown away because of corrupt, money-grubbing WEF acolytes and dilettante politicians who think their job is to make sure no one ever has any hurt feelings is highly frustrating. Some positives might be people re-evaluating their reliance on the health care system at large and drugs in particular. Both have a place in society, but people should realise they are the best protectors of their health and there is much they can do without heading to a doctor or popping a… Read more »
There seems to be an eternal tension between those who want to be left alone, who think adults should be left to stand or fall on their own, and those who want someone to wipe their arse for them. I tend to think that the former approach leads to better outcomes on average, but I would say that because I believe I have done a reasonable job of managing my own life, as an adult.
Maybe we need some new countries, for people who want to live as adults, and other countries for people who prefer to be treated like children. We’ve banned the sale of disposable BBQs FFS, because of the fire risk. We use them in our frigging garden! Clown world.
I have to reply re your friend and his knee problems. My brother had the same and I told him to go swimming and get an exercise bike. He did neither.
Many years later he saw a physiotherapist who said about going swimming and exercising his knee. He went swimming 2-3 times a week and guess what? His knee felt better!!!
He still needed a knee replacement but His swimming helped speed his recovery.
… but ‘less serious’ no doubt.
The narrative collapsed faster than formerly healthy young athletes on the field after being injected with the jabs.
A quick question, how does this system work? Who puts in the claims and decides the diagnostic code? Never having had experience of the German healthcare system or similar, the only claim we’ve put in has been for travel insurance when one of our children became ill when in France.
Why aren’t these jabs pulled?
At Nuremburg, defendants were asked why they stepped up the killings in the last days of the war, when they knew the camps must soon be overrun.
They implied that to have stopped or slowed down would have meant they knew that what had been done up to that point was wrong.
Evidently, the main danger they feared was not from retributive justice but from self-horror.
Maybe Shakespeare had the answer, in the Scottish: ‘I am in blood so far stepped in that, should I wade no more, returning were as bloody as go ‘oer.’