What’s Behind the Worldwide Drop in Birth Rates, Nine Months After the Vaccination Rollouts to Younger People?
A number of commentators have recently posted articles on significant falls around the world in reported live births during the first months of 2022.
“Jikkyleaks” posted Germany’s figures.
“Making Waves” posted Japan’s.
“IDK” posted the Netherlands’s – though the tweet seems to have been deleted now.
“Birth Gauge” has stats for a number of countries.
“O.S.” has Sweden’s.
“Orwell2024” has Hong Kong’s.
As these roughly correspond to a time nine months after the Covid vaccine rollout began in earnest for the childbearing-age portion of the population, I looked at U.K. data to see if I could find anything similar.
ONS does not report live births on a weekly basis as it does for deaths. Furthermore, it only releases provisional figures on an annual basis some months into the subsequent year.
However, Northern Ireland is much more up-to-date and reports current live births on a monthly basis, the most recent months by month of registration and earlier months by month of birth – the statistics authority says that 98% are correctly assigned to months of birth within 42 days of the birth.
Using these data, I calculated the average monthly live births in each month over the past six years (2016-2021) and compared this to the data from 2022. January to March 2022 is by month of birth, whilst April and May 2022 are still by month of registration only, which usually is an overcount compared to month of birth. The chart currently looks like this:
Over the first five months of 2022 the total number of live births is 8.9% lower than the average for 2016-2021. There is a particularly large fall in April, which may be significantly corrected when the April figures for month of birth become available.
This is how a chart comparing the first quarter total live births in 2022 to the previous six years looks.
This is a very large drop so the question that must be asked is whether the vaccines had any part to play. If they did, has this resulted in an increased number of stillbirths or miscarriages by women who were vaccinated during pregnancy, or have the vaccines impeded fertility or conception in some way; or rather is it due to a reduced level of conception by women who were vaccinated and subsequently avoided becoming pregnant in the period leading up to and following vaccination?
If we suppose the latter, one would then assume that the statistics would eventually show whether or not the effect is transitory. If it is, then with each subsequent month the live birth statistics will broadly follow the rates of vaccination of the fertile demographic 9 months previously, but if the effect is more chronic each subsequent month will show a falling trend as the total number of vaccinated women in the population increases.
Looking at England and Wales data from UKHSA, it can be seen that the percentage of unvaccinated women giving birth begins to fall rapidly from around May 2021 at a rate of between 5-10% per month.
We can surmise from this that the percentage of unvaccinated women conceiving in 2021 would be similar to this group and thus be a suitable proxy, as expectant mothers and those aspiring to conceive should have a similar risk appetite for taking the vaccines. Thus for example, those giving birth in January 2022 would have an unvaccinated representation at conception similar to women giving birth in April 2021. Here are the two scenarios displayed on the same graph with the 9 month lag between them:
The live birth hard data we have for Northern Ireland are currently only for the first three months of 2022, and those three months correspond to a situation where over 90% of women giving birth were unvaccinated at conception.
The data over the next few months will show that either there is no connection at all to the vaccination campaigns of 2021 or there is an effect which ebbs as we distance ourselves from those campaigns. In the latter scenario there is a question as to whether it is an adverse effect of the vaccine (which may manifest as increased miscarriages and stillbirths, or as reduced fertility) or whether it is due to behaviour change as women avoid becoming pregnant in the period leading up to and following vaccination. In the worst case scenario we will witness a continuing fall in live births due to a significant reduction in overall fertility.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Who, in their right mind, wants to bring a new child into the current World? Government’s have done a great job in deterring people, Hong Kong being the most successful. An imprisoned Chinese automaton for a child? No thanks.
Not sure why you got so many down votes
Having had two kids in the past 3 years, I agree. I must be mad.
They’re lovely girls, but it breaks my heart to think about the world they are going to be living in. All I can do for now is try to keep their childhood as normal as possible until the inevitable collapse of western civilisation occurs – which obviously has already started happening.
I agree. I’m way past that stage of life but if I wasn’t, I would not be having children now. The State treats parents as just their baby manufacturer and then wants to control every aspect of their upbringing and the “values” they will subscribe to. They have created the Brave New World Huxley warned us about. There is no such thing as “the family” now. Just The State.
If the data is presented graphically with the y-axis starting at zero, the drops look far less ominous.
There may be something there but so far the drop is small (except Hong Kong from which there has been a massive exodus of young people).
At this stage I would put it down, like unmaskthetruth to the fact that the world right now is not a place.one would want to bring a child into.
One way or the other the eugenicists will get their way…
We’re guessing, is the most accurate answer at present. Fairly unlikely to for the usual suspects to deliver the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. Some of it, but not all of it, and some lies and speculation as well, is more like it.
We know for a fact that menstruation was impacted by the vaccinations for many women. What percentage is hard to ascertain, but non-negligible. Disrupting menstruation is going to lead to messed up menstrual cycles and potentially a drop in conception.
On top of that, we know sperm counts are being negatively impacted (per the Israeli study).
These two factors together point to a drop in conception. It may be temporary. Let’s hope so. At least African nations haven’t touched the death jabs (yet) so there will still be humans (much to Gates et al’s dismay no doubt).
Indeed, outside of South Africa who is barely 50% jabbed, the rest of the continent (including SA’s neighbors) has jab rates still down in the basement for the most part. And go figure, better outcomes overall than most of the world in terms of excess deaths (relative to baseline), and they now have natural herd immunity that actually works. As opposed to the heavily jabbed world, stuck in an apparently endless cycle of boosters, variants, and reinfections.
If there is something nefarious going on it will be revealed in the coming years. I suspect the real problems will be that young men and women are found to be sterile. The size of the issue should be apparent by about 2030 but I suspect it will be significant.
I feel sure we will see this. Children of Men. Predictive programming?
It would be interesting to compare these results with figures from countries with low vaccination rates such as many parts of Africa. That might help indicate whether or not there is a correlation with covid vaccination rates.
Taiwan has had a huge decrease in live births in Q1 2022, so huge that it is a Sigma 26 event. Germany’s drop is a Sigma 9 event.
This data is devastating from a population level & with both male & female fertility being affected, there is going to be a devastating impact on couples trying to start a family.
All part of the evil plot.
The more I think about it, the more it seems to me as though we’ve effectively been nuked by the CCP. Imagine a weapon you could make the target population book an appointment to receive; and bring your adversaries to their knees without destroying any infrastructure or firing a shot. Whilst far fetched, when I listen to the revelations Naomi Wolf’s team has been uncovering I can’t make any other interpretations fit. Of course there are bad incentives and corruption, groupthink etc. But the harms were known, documented and lied about. How else can we explain this?
It is basically like a neutron bomb, kill the people but keep the infrastructure intact. Only far more insidious. And of course, the CCP would never get high on their own supply, as evidenced in their own country banning any mRNA jabs being administered on their own soil–except for all those dang troublemakers down in Hong Kong, of course. They too got Pfizered just like the West–and mainly the young there.
Bill Gates must be laughing all the way to the bank right now….
Genocide is what’s going on. I’m with Naomi Wolf on this. We’re witnessing the largest mass killing in human history. 100% deliberate. 100% calculated. Let’s call the mRNA shots what they are: a biological weapon.
This has been my view from the start.
The real agenda is depopulation.
Birth rates are going to collapse over the next decade.
So, playing devil’s advocate for a second and assuming that a sly, centralized cabal movement to depopulate the earth (for whatever reason) actually does exist, whoever is orchestrating all this from behind the curtains, this would be a particularly devious and untraceable method of doing so, since the 9-month phenomenon could easily be explained away by the other alternative mentioned above, namely the avoidance of pregnancy in the weeks / months surrounding vaccination. In theory, this effect could be distinguished from that caused by vaccine injury, by a sampling of enough individual women who had still-births or miscarriages (at any time), whose vaccination was roughly concomitant in time with the date of their conception (approx. 9 months). This is because still-births or miscarriages have nothing to do with avoiding pregnancy (obviously). If the percentage of women among a large random sample who satisfied the above conditions was significantly high, then “alarm bells”. If it was much lower than 50% then it could be put down to the high rate of miscarriages among pregnant women. Lack of conception due to to vaccine injury could be distinguished from the former being a result of no attempt at conception around the time of… Read more »
I keep coming back in my mind to China:
Have we been cleverly nuked?
With the Big Tech / Great Reset criminals opportunistically cashing in on the scheme?
I don’t agree with this CG. You seem to be accepting a degree of ‘cock-up’ theory and I resolutely do not:
China showed the way and we jumped on their bandwagon – not plausible. Once you read Iain Davis’ work at “In This Together” you will be converted.
And most of all, they banned mRNA jabs in their own country. After all, never get high on your own supply. Except for all those dang troublemakers down in Hong Kong, of course. They too got Pfizered just like the West–and mainly the young there.
And failing that, there is always plenty of their dirt-cheap fentanyl flooding the West to fall back on as well. Exhibit A: San Fransicko.
Ted Talks 2010 – Bill Gates casually said “We need to reduce the world’s population by 10-15%.
Stand for freedom against the Weasels of Westminster
Yellow Boards By The Road
**
Friday 1st July 4pm to 5pm
Yellow Boards
Junction B3430 Nine Mile Ride &
New Wokingham Road
Wokingham RG40 3BA
**
Stand in the Park Sundays from 10.30am to 11.30am
make friends & keep sane
Wokingham
Howard Palmer Gardens Sturges Rd RG40 2HD
**
Bracknell
South Hill Park, Rear Lawn, RG12 7PA
**
Henley
Mills Meadows (bandstand) RG9 1DS
**
Telegram http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell
That was the motte of course, the gaffe where the quiet part is said out loud, while the bailey is “but, I meant that women will choose to have fewer kids because they will know that more of them will survive to adulthood thanks to our wonderful lifesaving vaccines”. Or something. Classic motte and bailey argument there.
I was about to say, “clean sperm is the new Bitcoin”, but then I remembered that Bitcoin crashed recently. LOL
Moral of the story: Mother Nature does NOT like to be effed with!