How Can the Greased Piglet Survive? Cut Taxes, Scrap the NI Protocol, Ditch ‘Net Zero’, Lean in to the Culture War and Start Fracking

So, Boris has won tonight’s confidence vote, but the general consensus in the media is that he’s toast. In 2019, Theresa May won a confidence vote by 63% to 37% and she was gone within six months. He did worse, winning by 211 votes to 148, or 59% to 41%. When you factor in that he’s likely to lose two by-elections on June 23rd and the House of Commons Privileges Committee has yet to conclude its investigation into whether he misled Parliament over partygate, things don’t look good for the man David Cameron calls the “greased piglet”. Has the immortal cat finally ran out of lives?

Not so fast. Another way of looking at this, as Guido Fawkes points out, is that Boris has pulled off a lucky escape. After all, if the rebels had waited until after the by-election results and the Privileges Committee report – assuming they’re both terrible for Boris – it now looks as though they might have succeeded in forcing a leadership election. Did they miscalculate how little support there is for the Prime Minister in the parliamentary party? Timing in politics is everything and the rebels shot their bolt too early.

Yes, Theresa May resigned six months after winning a confidence vote by a greater margin than Boris, but his ability to brazen out these humiliations is surely greater than hers. As the rules stand, there cannot now be another confidence vote for at least 12 months, so on paper at least Boris is secure until June 2023. Changing leader with less than a year to go before the next General Election would be far riskier move than doing so now.

Another important difference between Boris and his predecessor is that he’s a much more polarising figure within the Parliamentary Party. There are at least 100 Conservative MPs who loathe and detest Boris down to their tippy toes, but, equally, there are at least 100 who will die in a ditch to defend him. That means his core support is less likely to ebb away in the wake of an unconvincing victory than Theresa May’s.

The pro- and anti-Boris factions largely skew along pro- and anti-Brexit lines, which is another reason not to write him off. If he’s deposed, can the Spartans guarantee his successor will have the same determination to ‘get Brexit done’ as him? The current favourite to win a leadership election is Jeremy Hunt, who was a staunch Remainer. While the Northern Ireland protocol remains in place, defenestrating Boris is a massive risk.

So, I think it may be premature to write off the “greased piglet”. In which case, it makes sense to ask what he can do to shore up his position. The answer is obvious: start acting like a proper conservative. It’s a safe bet the majority of the Tory MPs who voted for him tonight are on the right of the Party so if he’s going to survive he needs to throw them some red meat. That means cutting taxes, scrapping the NI protocol, ditching ‘Net Zero’, leaning into the culture war and resurrecting the U.K.’s fracking industry. If he does all that, not only will be consolidate his support in Parliament, but he might start winning back some of those Red Wall voters who ‘leant’ him their vote in 2019. What’s he got to lose? The people on the wrong side of all those issues are on the left of the Party and it’s clear from tonight’s vote that he’s never going to win them back.

Come on, Boris. Get back in touch with your inner Tory and start acting like a Conservative Prime Minister with an 80-seat majority. Put clear blue water between your party and the progressive coalition that will be ranged against you at the next election. Show some backbone. As your hero said, an appeaser is someone who feeds the crocodile in the hope that it will eat him last.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

23 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
crisisgarden
4 years ago

I think this was the best outcome for sceptics. Well not the best outcome but you know what I mean. His removal would be very satisfying to those unfortunate souls who still cling to the idea that lockdowns and other covid lunacies were necessary. Now we have the spectacle of a leader who broke his own ridiculous rules and got away with it. What a handsome epitaph for Covid-1984.

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago

“Greased piglet”?

Blimey, you should have seen what the Guardian used to call Dodgy Dave!

“Sir” Nigel Farage was saying tonight (GB News) that the bigger risk for the Conservative Party was keeping Johnson rather than choosing someone else to lead the party.

In fact, the biggest risk to the party is if a lot of people end up cold and hungry this Winter. Johnson’s government must get serious about fracking and all the rest of it before it is too late.

TheGreenAcres
4 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

We need Operation Warp Speed to get those fracking wells productive by winter. The shafts are already sunk after all. They could have kicked off this in February when Russia invaded, but better late than never..

EppingBlogger
4 years ago
Reply to  TheGreenAcres

Yes but being seen to have taken note and doing something, anything top help would be better than the current policy of “stop using hydrocarbons otherwise we will all boil on the streets”.

welshsceptic
welshsceptic
4 years ago

Toby’s right again in this piece when he says that, if Boris wants to stay in power, he should now start “cutting taxes, scrapping the NI protocol, ditching ‘Net Zero’, leaning into the culture war and resurrecting the U.K.’s fracking industry.”

In addition, however, Boris should also state that his govt will never again impose masks and lockdowns in England, or use vaccine passports, or coerce people to take experimental vaccines that are neither safe nor effective.

Without convincing reassurances on these covid issues, as well as reassurances on the other things, I certainly won’t be voting Tory at the next general election.

@yorkshirekate
@yorkshirekate
4 years ago
Reply to  welshsceptic

No Tory/Labou/Lib Dem leader is going to say no more lockdowns etc, alas. There are far too many people who didn’t stop to think and ran for cover under the perceived security blanket of government diktats. I won’t be voting Tory unless I’m forced into it, (no alternative candidate, preferably Reclaim or Reform or suitable Independent.)

JeremyP99
4 years ago
Reply to  welshsceptic

Um, Boris has already said her would have no problem with imposing another lockdown if “needed”. This after Partygate demonstrated that he and his staff KNEW Covid was a fraud.*

What more do you need to know?

*<10K dead FROM Covid between Feb 2020 and Dec 2021

https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/covid19deathsandautopsiesfeb2020todec2021

What happened to the option to upload images?

JeremyP99
4 years ago
Reply to  JeremyP99

Not to mention that lockdown destroyed my wife’s business, built up over 20 years. I’ve had to dip into my pension simply for us to survive.

Help from Johnson and co.?

£0

TheGreenAcres
4 years ago
Reply to  welshsceptic

NHS IT is still recruiting for project managers and engineers for Covid passes, so I think that tells us what we need to know…

EppingBlogger
4 years ago
Reply to  welshsceptic

Sack Professor pantsdown too – it would be a popular move all round.

huxleypiggles
4 years ago

Unfortunately,

Toby starts from the wrong place. Bozo is a puppet and behaves as one so from his WEF masters point of view he is an annoying nuisance who keeps forgetting the script.

Fortunately, Bozo going off script means nothing more than occasionally forgetting his lines and partying too much. He hasn’t got a Churchill or a Thatcher bone in his body so there is no danger he will refuse to co-operate and certainly no danger he will seek to implement any of Toby’s policy suggestions. Actually, if he had any guts, simply banning net Zero, opening up fracking and kicking the shyte out of woke and its warriors would go a long way to restoring some national pride.

The WEF are fortunate that they still control this spineless, traitorous clown and we are perhaps lucky that while he remains in No 10 he is unable to push any further lockdown nonsense for either covid version 13 or some moneypox bollox.

I suspect the Davos mob are currently scratching their heads.

TheGreenAcres
4 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Pretty much what I was going to say. This wasn’t so much a miscalculation by the rebels as a coordinated ‘warning shot’ from the real power wielders out there. I imagine Boris will swiftly fold on Rwanda and the NI Protocol now that the message has been delivered.

Lockdown Sceptic
4 years ago

The depressing thing about all this is there is nobody I want. Most Conservative MPs voted through lockdowns without a question. They all seem happy with the deaths and injuries caused by the Covid Jabs and the Online Bill designed to end free speech.

**
Stand in the Park Sundays 10.30 -11.30am 
make friends & keep sane 
from the globalist covid & climate propaganda

*
Wokingham 
Howard Palmer Gardens Sturges Rd RG40 2HD  
*
Bracknell  
South Hill Park, Rear Lawn, RG12 7PA

*
Henley 
Mills Meadows (bandstand) RG9 1DS

*
Telegram astandintheparkbracknell

Darren Turner
Darren Turner
4 years ago

Totally agree with this article. Out and out true blue right of centre Conservatism is the only chance Boris and the country have to avoid becoming a backwater to a socialist New World Order.

DevonBlueBoy
DevonBlueBoy
4 years ago

It’s a bit rich for Cameron to be insulting Johnson; putting aside the fact that “greased piglet” is far too nice an insult considering his actions.
If Cameron hadn’t thrown his toys out of the pram and resigned after the referendum result, but had instead listened to the electorate, we would not have had either May or Johnson.

Michael Staples
Michael Staples
4 years ago

Toby is right but incomplete on policy U-turns required. We also need immigration of one million a year drastically reduced – talk about taking back control; they’ve done the complete opposite, especially the 500,000 student visas, by no means the brightest and the best, who are used to shore up our over-hyped university sector and all of whom can stay on, even if they work in McDonalds.

RW
RW
4 years ago

A drive behind Brexit always was “Get rid of the darned Poles to make space for more Indians”, ie, that was never about reducing immigration, just about reshaping it more to the tastes of politically influential factions of nominally ex-immigrant UK residents. As it stands at the moment, the UK needs immigration to replace its otherwise dwindling population and – more importantly – when there’s space in a fertile and rich country, people will come from everywhere to exploit that. In other words, these people are going to come, no matter what. The idea that the last native Brit can simply switch the lights off before he dies on an otherwise empty island isn’t going to fly. Reproduce or die out. That’s how things works in nature. Substituting that with immigration control won’t work.

Nearhorburian
Nearhorburian
4 years ago
Reply to  RW

Complete drivel.

It wasn’t necessary to leave the EU in order to increase non-EU immigration because non-EU immigration wasn’t an EU competence. In fact, I don’t think there was a single year when non-EU immigration didn’t exceed EU immigration.

Immigration quintupled after 97 because of policy decisions made by the Blair government, not because suddenly 5 times as many people wanted to come here.

Record legal immigration in 2021 was because the government handed out a record number of visas.Increasing cross-Channel illegal immigration is happening because the government had made it clear that anybody who makes it to the Channel near Calais will be allowed to settle here, even if they have to make a couple of tries. (The Rwanda agreement is about conning the population while actually increasing immigration)

There is clearly less space here with each passing year, and the SE of England is by far the most densely populated area of similar size in Europe, so according to your logic demand to settle here should be reducing.

No: we are witnessing population replacement in so many countries with white indigenous or founding populations because that is desired by those who own our politicians.

RW
RW
4 years ago
Reply to  Nearhorburian

The argument that being in the EU would imply that citizens of other EU countries had an unfair immigration advantage was repeatedly made during these days, the prominent sound bite being “EU citizens jumping the immigration queue” (IIRC, that came from Theresa May). Apart from that, you seem to be making one of my points: The people who advocated “Take back control” never meant to use that to curb immigration as such, just to change its nature. Very polemically worded, “We hates Poles who work and love Indians who don’t!” (and Chinese, obviously). And you seem to have misunderstood the second one: These densely populated areas are only densely populated because lots of people who aren’t English are settling there. This wouldn’t have been possible by time the when the majority of the population of England were poor or very poor English people, there being so many of them that they even mass-emigrated to foreign countries. As the native (or once native) population shrinks, the non-native (or now-native) population will increase. That’s happening all over western Europe and the likely cause is “Too little children being born because that’s sort-of inconvenient and expensive” and easily preventable“. Again, polemically worded, culturally,… Read more »

JeremyP99
4 years ago

Living in the rural South West, and observing the Conservative government’s complete indifference to our economic welfare (just got high speed broadband, 8+ years after the Paris Council started work on getting it in our area, still no reliable mobile signal – whilst urban areas rave about 5G, how about 1G for us?

Bus service pathetic, meaning most working people need a car, which of course means far higher travel costs than folk in London for example, who seem to garner in all sorts of tax based subsidies from us in the South West.

This article sums it up.

Johnson can fuck off. He’s a bloody menace.

https://capx.co/the-tory-heartlands-face-drastic-poverty-downing-st-must-sit-up-and-take-notice/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=06%2F06%2F22+

BurlingtonBertie
4 years ago
Reply to  JeremyP99

With the known & unknown risks of 5G to human health, you’re better off without it. It’s been quietly installed on top of the new LED street lighting in my village. No mention of it being installed, or requested, in any of the documentation.

TheGreenAcres
4 years ago

If past form is anything to go by, he will end up bowing to the left in a futile attempt to win their support. That means keeping everything we think he should scrap and doubling down on net zero.

DevonBlueBoy
DevonBlueBoy
4 years ago
Reply to  TheGreenAcres

Or is he bowing to the demands of Princess Nut Nuts; that well known air head?