U.K. Covid Inquiry Proposes to Examine Vaccine Deaths
The Chair of the U.K. independent public Covid inquiry, Baroness Heather Hallett, has told the Prime Minister she wants her inquiry to cover vaccine side-effects and fatalities. The Mail has the story.
Very rare yet serious side-effects from the Covid vaccine could be explored in the forthcoming public inquiry into the pandemic.
It may also look into the struggle which affected families have faced in getting compensation.
Probe chairwoman Baroness Heather Hallett wrote to the Prime Minister last Thursday outlining the key areas under scrutiny – including pandemic preparedness, lockdowns, testing, PPE and care homes – which he will have to sign off before the inquiry can begin.
The Mail on Sunday has learned that she also asked if her inquiry can cover deaths and life-changing side-effects from the jabs.
While multiple studies have shown Covid vaccines to be safe – with more than 53 million Britons having had at least one dose and nearly 40 million receiving three – a small minority of people suffered serious health problems including blood clots and inflammation in the heart.
In the U.K., medical regulators have reported 438 blood clot cases and 79 deaths linked to the AstraZeneca vaccine.
More than 900 applications have now been filed for compensation over death or injury due to vaccines, with the total claims reaching £110 million. However, not a single payment has been made.
The inquiry seems unlikely to explore this issue properly if only because the data collected and published on it to date are so limited and poor. But it is reassuring at least that the head of the inquiry wants to cover it, and presumably the Prime Minister will not refuse permission. Good also to see pandemic preparedness in there – it will be interesting to see what the inquiry makes of the Government’s performance when assessed against its own plans.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
The costs always outweighed the benefit, whether that the lockup, the masks or the jab.
What is missing is a simple cost benefit approach … after all this time they are only ever looking at one side of the equation, and to have to ask permission to look at one small aspect on the other side, just shows how one-sided and useless this “inquiry” will be. Despite everything being the wrong thing to do, they will find “government acted appropriately” … because they won’t look at the damage done by government’s actions.
I suppose I should look into the life of Baroness Hallett, but from her/his/their/its photo I think I know what I am going to find. Is it wrong of me to think that? Can anyone give me a hint of evidence she is anything more than a functionary?
I followed the career of one of the climategate chairs who gave the UEA such an easy ride and “forgot” to look at anything important. He went on to a series of well paid jobs as “thanks”.
Mike. Have a look at the career success of the guy who said ‘children won’t know what snow is’ to paraphrase.
Same with every global warming crook who are never caught.
From the 1980s we have had a tool to analyse this. QALYs, quality adjusted life years. It was ignored.
To make a statement, you must have done some calculations on data.
Where are they?
Little Fon
Got on
Our nerves.
Concrete garden
No kind of pardon
Deserves.
Now a pseudo-sceptic
Is driving us dyspeptic.
There’ll soon be a worse ‘un.
They’re all the same person,
Or if not,
The same bot.
There was rational, leek and good old tree,
So many names, but none authentic,
And here’s one more, whom you must agree,
Is neither genuine nor actually sceptic.
We can’t help if you don’t want to learn.
Why 19 little down-thumbs, for simply asking for the justification?
Calculations not required when you just believe.
“Scepticism” must be a religion
The USA FDA has a statistical life value of $7.9 million, or £6.45.
So far there have been 2 000+ recorded – young healthy, lives – confirmed as CoVid vaccine deaths, that is over £12.9 billion.
As adverse reactions for any drug are reckoned to be under reported by a factor of ten, the actual life cost is likely to be much higher.
And this was done to ‘protect’ people over the age of 80, with serious underlying medical conditions, with life expectancy of 12 months or less.
Add on the Human cost of bereaved families and also cost of non-fatal vaccine injury and we have a very big number. And that is before we factor in the cost of lockdown.
And the meter is still running because the on-cost of vaccines and lockdown has some distance to travel.
But what are burning priorities? Net Zero, internet censorship and Ukraine.
All this is a quite vague and unjustified attempt at one side of the equation. But at least you have tried. Now what about the other side of the equation?
What you need to do is calculate a sum as follows:
(cost for benefits) – (cost of implementation of vaccination) – (cost of downsides)
If this is greater than zero, then vaccines were positive.
Kindly quantify the benefits of vaccinations, being that they do not stop either contraction nor transmission of covid.
Would your cost of implementation include the unused Nightingale hospitals, the cost of unsuitable PPE or the cost of the vaccine now left on the shelves because fewer people are taking them?
How can one quantify the “downsides” when they are completely unknown as no long term studies were undertaken to demonstrate the risks they represented to people even just a few years on from taking them?
I might also point to the decline in children’s education, the loss to the economy of lockdowns, the loss of jobs etc.
There was a good piece on either The Expose or Children’s Health Defence that for every life saved by the fake vaccine there were 5 that died from it. Not even next to useless.
Very unlikely to be true. Can you reference the ” good piece”?
Vaccinations vastly reduce the proportion of infected from becoming seriously ill or dying. The evidence for this is very very clear.
Nightingale hospitals are not related, but were stupid.
PPE not related.
My point in answering the original sweeping statement, is that if you have nothing to back it up, then the writer’s opinion is just that and should not be taken seriously, until some real background work has been done.
The fact that hoards of “sceptics” quickly support such worthless opinions tells me that they don’t begin to understand how to approach these questions.
It will be a complex task to understand the benefits/costs of all the various aspects of the pandemic response and even then impossible to estimate the impact had nothing been done.
You of the sweeping statement..see above…this site is “full of anti vaxxers”…..you are a dolt, we all recognise that.
Please “hordes” not “hoards”.
‘ Vaccinations/snake oils vastly reduce the proportion from becoming seriously ill or dying. The evidence is very clear’……..There is NO evidence at all for any of the jabs. Find me a study on any jab with a control group included. In Michael Alderton’s 1981 book on International mortality he shows many examples of mortality over the years and when snake oils were introduced. For example UK mortality for measles was 1,250 per 100,000 in 1900. By the time the jab was introduced in the early 1960s it was below 5 and still decreasing. What happened between 1900 and 1960 to reduce measles mortality by over 95%?? I suggest simple things like cleaner water, sanitation, better living conditions and electricity. He also has similar finding for TB, Diphtheria, Polio (man made ‘virus’) and Influenza. The jabs have taken all the credit for falling rates when they contributed sfa (apart from lining the pockets of Big Pharma and their Rockafella trained germ theory, blinkered GPs/Health professionals). As Professor Edward H Kass, the much respected physician , and infectious disease researcher, warned in the 80s ‘beware of worshipping at the wrong altar’ . What’s your next line of expertise?? The bullshit PCR tests,… Read more »
Please cite the sources of your ‘evidence’.
This article appears to see a different picture?
https://staging.dailysceptic.org/2022/05/07/vaccinated-hospitalised-for-non-covid-reasons-at-five-times-the-rate-of-the-unvaccinated-u-k-government-data-show/
If you survived them, sure. And the image is five months out of date…
Or of you were unlucky, but lived, you might have got one of these horrible life changing conditions
The there’s always this. Yes, they have a shot for Anaphulaxis.
But not bee stings as such…
Not to mention that the vaccines don’t work. They may lessen the symptoms of some, but they neither prevent the recipient from getting the disease they were “vaccinated” against (Moob Boy Gates has it at the moment), or passing it on, which leads to this simple and correct flow chart.
Of course, vaccine passports were always utterly discriminatory. Deliberately.
Indeed, worse than useless….
At least the Irish authorities made no bones about the dangers of the clot shots. I know no-one who was warned about more than a very few side effects.
And ALL this for a disease that actually killed less than 10k people. About 30 under the age of fifty.
Maybe half the number the jabs killed?
https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/covid19deathsandautopsiesfeb2020todec2021
Utterly nonsensical to say they don’t work.
Keep spouting drivel on this site and guarantee no-one will ever take any notice.
And what evidence are you relying on to say the jabs work? The UKHSA data is highly questionable due to reasons including the size of the unvaccinated population not being clearly known; the confounding correlation between individual health and choice to take the shots; and unexplained high death rates of unvaccinated subjects following the shots, suggesting data issues.
Note the conspicuous absence of quality cohort studies on vaccine effectiveness, measurement of outcomes using more meaningful and bias-free indicators such as all-cause mortality, or any attempt to quantify how the vaccine has led to increased spread of the virus (as can be seen in comparison to more lowly vaccinated countries).
He hasn’t any evidence. In any case, if there was ANY evidence he wouldn’t have time to find it as he spend his day playing with himself when corrupts twats like Hilary Jones, Whitty, Gates or Vallence appear on TV
See above.
These are the latest European figures. I update them weekly here.
Did they make you have it at the troll academy? If so you must be a little worried; Maybe that’s why your comments are so bitchy and lame.
18/18 can’t answer, but just believe…..
No inquiry into the persecution of the unvaccinated, naturally.
British “inquires” are undertaken with the intention of hiding the truth.You could write the report conclusion before they start, and the whole “inquiry” is an attempt to find “evidence” to justify their already decided conclusion.
Exactly! Who any longer trusts the British State, now under the Johnson Regime more brazen in its contempt for both its own people and the truth than ever before?
As with ‘Policy driven Science”. Make the facts fit the conclusion.
Midazolam deaths anyone? Injecting children? Face mask compliance nonsense, man-made origin of virus?
What persecution?
Clearly you are
Remind us all how many unjabbed care workers were sacked.
Remind us also, of how many articles in the MSM were calling for us to be prosecuted/sacked/denied healthcare/banned from flights (which we were) etc.
*tumbleweed
Maybe that should be his next screen name?
yep, you won’t get an answer from
treesplinteractually sceptic.Investigate, but not compensate…
rightly so, the idiots knew the risks and signed the disclaimer
It’s akin to Prosecuting Counsel writing to Fred West and asking him what areas did he want covered
Indeed Cecil… and it’s worth returning to Mr. Bordie’s article back in April.
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/my-eight-simple-questions-for-the-covid-inquiry/
This being the key para:
Dial in this looming WHO mandate being voted for next week or so…. this has to be negated if we are to avoid future crushing of our citizen rights and freedoms.
Neil’s thankfully on it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gafV6YhhnAQ
Will the MSM pick this up?
No, of course not… this draconian technofacist reset rolls on.
From the crow’s nest of RMS Pandemic: “Whitewash right ahead!”
Yellow Card Reports on 13th May show deaths are up 36 over 2 weeks to a total of 2,132. Adverse reactions up to 1,490,271.
Here are a few points to note:
This is the highest weekly death count since 3rd March.
An average 1 death in 27,113 jabs over three periods is the highest death rate so far.
Based on this 2 week period alone, it is 1 death in 15,527 jabs.
This week, MHRA removed 113 adverse reactions from previous weeks. Apart from one anomaly in June 2021, it is the highest level of MHRA ‘tinkering’ so far: 10x the average.
More details on Telegram at https://t.me/mikes_stuff
Good work……
Not good work a 5 year old can see past this.
But not “sceptics” though!
a 5 year old can see through this……….are you using your present mental age as the main parameter for that statement?
Just posted something similar… Well done!
And so it will steadily continue.
As with Covid, Do we start saying death “with the vaccine or from the “vaccine”?
Yellow Cared estimated by the authorities themselves as representing just around 10% of the actual number of side-effects or fatalities.
Why is this never mentioned I wonder?
There is a double standard in the ONS/MHRA reports. When vaccine linked deaths are discussed the repeated caveat us that this is an overestimate as many would have died by chance shortly after vaccination. This point is never made for Covid infection listed deaths. With/of again, and the believers will continue to believe.
Add to that all the reactions not attributed to the vaccine. In the past three weeks I have heard of:
1 person in their mid 70s who in the past year has developed epilepsy
1 person in their mid 70s who in the past year has developed a nasty autoimmune disease causing rashes and sores all over their body
1 person in their mid 30s who in the past six months has developed Guillain Barre syndrome and is now learning to walk again.
Anybody think of anything out of the ordinary that has happened in the past year? Anyone? Nope that’s right nothing 👀
Add to that an article in the DT this week discussing animosity between dog walkers and farmers. The stress one dog walker experienced was so great that in May 2021 it ‘caused her to have a stroke’.
So just an FYI everyone, stress is causing strokes now.
a stroke of the dog?
In our circle, we’re approaching 100% of vaccine recipients that we know developing known and in some cases very serious adverse reactions. We’ve seen it all, strokes, heart attacks, sudden unexpected deaths, DVTs, other clotting issues. It’s stunning.
Meaningless numbers, unless you compare against natural rates.
Bear in mind that >1% of the population dies each year. or 1 in 5000 each week.
As usual, “Lessons will be learned…”
> Are lockdowns effective at stopping viral spread?……..’No’
> Are face-masks effective outside a clinical setting?…….’No’
> Did the jabs work as claimed?…….’No’
> Should we do any of this ever again?……..’No’
There, the basis of the enquiry is complete.
As for the rest, she might ask: > Why did the government break all of its conventions and the spirit of common law to seize power illicitly, award itself unlimited spending powwrs and rule by decree for 18 months? > Why did it abandon its long-held plan that advocated a much more liberal and far, far cheaper way of achieving the objective? > Why were the MSM been given so much money and told what to publish? > Why did the government actively manipulate and massage death statistics? > Why were PCR-tests used to manipulate powers under the Public Health Act 1984 and lock everyone up? > Why were two high level PHE staff members of the group that authored the Corman-Drosten Paper that endorsed PCR-tests? > Why have children and young people been actively targeted for control measures? > Why were jabs consider essential for everyone when only a very small section of society was at risk? > Why did the government break the law and mandate jabs for care home workers – why did they try to do the same for NHS staff? > Why have jabs not been stopped when it is clear that they are doing… Read more »
I would like to see the evidence that a small section of society benefitted from gene therapy drugs.
You won’t because there was no gene therapy.
It has been acknowledged by several members of the Pharmaceutical Industry that the jabs are a form of Gene therapy. What there are not is a vaccine. (Until they changed the long standing definition). Whatever your Masters tell you this forum contains a large number of highly qualified, intelligent contributors who do their research. Your sniping is doomed to fail.
No this forum contains a bunch of anti-vaxxers, who read and repeat stuff that suits their politics.
Now the fact that you can find some weird folks to say gene therapy, does not make it true.
Ha! Does anti-vax mean intelligent free thinkers? I’ll agree with that. https://elcolectivodeuno.wordpress.com/2021/06/18/the-killer-covid-vaccine-a-genocidal-bioweapon-and-funvax-nanotechnology/
Gene ‘therapy’ is misleading as there is no ‘therapy’ in the toxic jabs. Gene modification might be a better term.
Designed to Cross the Blood-Brain Barrier: Pharma and the FDA Knew Lipid Nanoparticles Go Everywhere (rumble.com)
No gene therapy, No vaccine, No spike proteins, No need to worry. Do you seriously believe that will stand up in court?
actually sceptic is a great believer in the scientific method known as COINCIDENCE
She will be told not to ask any of these questions.
We must remember that only one Senior Retired Supreme Court Judge. Lord Sumption, challenged the legality of Johnson’s Emergency Power and the measures that followed on.
He was ‘cancelled’ by the Deep State of course.
It’ll be years before we even get to see the results a la Sue Gray
Inquiries are a way to stop the police investigations until it is too late to prosecute.
These days the Police are just told to say: “Nothing to see here , move on, you are causing an obstruction and will be arrested!”
Why were vaccines initially given to ALL people with NO contraindications?
No other medication in the British National Formulary is treated like that.
That is faith healing not medicine.
For sheer mastery in how to face enquiry, look to the obnoxious Fauci. No amount of public humiliation and opprobium will suffice when it comes to politicians and civil servants, but there’s no harm in laying it on good and thick.
> Should we compensate the people whose income was destroyed with a tax raid on those who supported the measures…….’Yes’
Especially when the money went into the pockets of Government Toadies as part of Johnsons’ “levelling up/down scheme” ( Filthy Rich levelled up and the Middle Class levelled down of course!)
The Politics of Medical Gaslighting (substack.com)
Have you fallen into a inverter?
Report done, now we can move onto prosecuting the corrupt, evil, or completely incapable cretins like Whitty, Vallence, Handjob, Javid, everyone on SAGE, Ferguson (Imbecile College London), June Raine MHRA etc who are behind this crime against humanity charade!!
Go on, have another inquiry! I’ve heard enough from politicians in the last two years to know that they are all inveterate liars, this will be yet another whitewash paid for yours truly.
Lady Hallett sat as Coroner for the 7/7 bombings inquest
On 6 May 2011, the Coroner, Lady Justice Hallett, issued a report under Rule 43 of the Coroner’s Rules 1984. She concluded that “the evidence I have heard does not justify the conclusion that any failings on the part of any organisation or individual caused or contributed to any of the deaths”.
This despite the fact that it was never explained why the Security Service surveillance teams watching these suspects were withdrawn weeks before they blew themselves up
off the top of my head recalling “Terror on the Tube: Behind the Veil of 7/7, an InvestigationBook by Nicholas Kollerstrom”
Why the train they “arrived” on didn’t exist, it had been cancelled.
or why all the CCTV images from the station were provably photoshopped
or how an explosive device placed on the floor can blow the floor upwards (clearly the explosions came from beneath the floor)
or how the “suicide bombers” managed to get shot in canary warf after the explosions (radio news reports)
or how Peter Powers was running a “table top” exercise at the time, exactly the same as the events occurred (as he said on BBC News)
or the truth about Jean Charles da Silva e de Menezes (likely witness to the teams planting the devices the night before)
or the reasons the bus route changed
or the evidence of liniar shaped charges on the bus roof (still visible on the famous picture – anong with a parked vehicle for an explosive demo company)
etc. etc.
7/7 Ripple Effect 2 https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=111&part=1&gen=99
Nick Kollerstrom on the 7/7 London Bombings https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=55&part=1&gen=99
Nick Kollerstrom on the 7/7 London Bombings – Part 2 https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=56&part=1&gen=99
Not forgetting the movie signage on the side of bus they detonated which had the words “OUTRIGHT TERROR…BOLD AND BRILLIANT” written on it. Just a coincedence of course, like the fact that an Israeli company was managing the CCTV critical infrastructure which failed in key areas and we had all kinds of related malfunctions and as mentioned a whole series of unexplained anomolies which just got swept under the carpet. Then the West End ran a production for months called Outright terror – bold and brilliant”. Its all good though, they were only trying to keep us safe so it cant happen again. Thats why we pay the government all this money and give them all this power, to keep everyone safe. Thats what goverrnment is for. 911 and 77 clearly came from the same place. Another interesting line of enquiry is the mystery Jaguar car which was at the dry run 9 days earlier and 77. See article for all links: Remember The 7/7 London Bombings? Remember The Jaguar? https://wideshut.co.uk/remember-the-77-london-bombings-remember-the-jaguar/ On the morning of the attacks, when CCTV captured alleged bomber Germaine Lindsay in the car park at Luton station we also see a mysterious Jaguar parked next to… Read more »
Everything Is a Rich Man’s Trick – Full Documentary – YouTube
Great! She can just do a ‘cut and paste’ job then?
Regardless of all the statistics, the fact staring everyone in the face is that we are now in a worse position, by every metric, than we would have been had we done nothing in 2019.
But do remember that everything claimed by the Johnson Government and the sold-out MSM, on any subject, is the opposite of ‘the truth’ and you can’t go far wrong!
How do you know what would have happened had we done nothing?
15/16 disapprove of questions.
I thought sceptics asked questions.
not fatuous straw man questions.
”While multiple studies have shown Covid vaccines to be safe “
Really? Which ones? The MHRA have not followed up on more than a tiny fraction of cases. Total Bull.
Why not start with sportsmen dropping like flies?
Predictable white wash on its way.
No serious studies whatever have shown the ‘vaccines’ to be safe – they start as they ,mean to go -with a lie.
The report is discredited before it is even written!
What kind of “State ” do we now live in ?
…a State of Disrepair?
Apart from all the serious studies, that is.
and real-life data.
They are safe, accept it and get over it.
Please do reference these.
And what, pray tell, are you “actually” “sceptic”al about?
Many things.
But being sceptical means looking properly at evidence. It doesn’t mean choosing a side, then selecting stuff to back it up.
Did you use the same evidence to come to the conclusion that they were also effective?
Well you can read the clinical trial reports. If you find something wrong, you could write about it.
Funny that nobody has done such a thing on this site.
Then you can look at real-life data on efficacy. You can do this for multiple vaccines in multiple countries.
If you find dodgy data, please write about it.
I have done these things and it is very clear that they are effective.
The clinical trials for the mRNA vaccines show they lead to increased death per a recent study in the Lancet.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4072489
Yet you still haven’t produced a shred of evidence to support your assertion that the frankenjabs have saved any lives, while plenty of posters have produce data, graphs and charts showing their lethality. Put up, please, or shut up.
Very rare yet serious side-effects from the Covid vaccine could be explored in the forthcoming public inquiry into the pandemic.
Surely if this is investigated the least she will expect is a full analysis of the yellow card data which the HMRA has to date failed to produce. Hopefully they’ll also discover the ‘not so rare’ side effects too.
How can Heather Hallett know the side effects are “very rare” if she has not yet held the enquiry – calling them ‘very rare’ has dismissed them already ,so expect the following in final report:
“There were serious side-effects, but they were very rare” ( So that’s OK then!)
Looks like they have written the ‘conclusions’ already – to save her the time!
They really do think the people are congenitally stupid – looking at he last two years, perhaps they are right
Well everyone of you that has trawled the yellow card data, thinking you have proven something has actually shown they are very rare.
Do you disagree with yourselves?
Did you hear the one about the vaccine that was stopped because of 50 deaths? Probably not part of your briefing package.
Which vaccine was that? which country/countires?
Interferon as a cancer treatment was stopped when four people were admitted with myocardial infarction in Paris.
It’s the swine flu one, in the 1970s I think. Here is part of the documentary about it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bOHYZhL0WQ
When you see some of the vaccine damage, just consider that these are actual people. We’re not just talking about yellow cards and data.
Do the research yourself, for once.
23/23 do disagree with themselves, it would seem.
I’ve got some advice for you. Your trolling is currently attracting no responses (other than downticks) because it’s very weak and contains none of your own opinions, which makes it very easy to identify you as a troll. It might be a better strategy to at least pose as an actual human, you know, have some opinions, say some things, relay some information about you and your background/qualifications etc. That way you could possibly lure people in. As it stands, it looks like a very tawdry attempt to disrupt the conversation. Just saying.
That’s the Mail talking, not Heather Hallet. Heaven only knows why we’re being told the article in this comic masquerading as a newspaper is “worth reading in full”.
https://joannenova.com.au/2022/05/would-350-million-from-big-pharma-be-enough-to-buy-fauci-and-nih-approval-who-knows-its-a-secret/
We could do with following the money in this country.
“Very rare yet serious side-effects…” Let’s get a numeric definition of ‘very rare’ and a medical definition of ‘serious side-effect’, then also apply those definitions to other vaccines. How does the Covid ‘vaccine’ then compare using those same definitions? i.e. how safe is this new tech when measured against traditional vaccines? I think we all know the answer.
Very rare is defined in the BNF as being less than 1 in 10000. Thus in the U.K. this would equate to a maximum of 6800 serious adverse events. What constitutes a serious event is not so well defined.
See https://bnf.nice.org.uk/guidance/adverse-reactions-to-drugs.html
This is a list of side effects to the MMR vaccine, frequency unknown:
“Angioedema; arthritis; ataxia; cough; dizziness; encephalopathy; eye inflammation; irritability; meningitis aseptic; nerve deafness; nerve disorders; oculomotor nerve paralysis; oedema; panniculitis; papillitis; paraesthesia; regional lymphadenopathy; respiratory disorders; seizures; Stevens-Johnson syndrome; subacute sclerosing panencephalitis; syncope; throat pain; thrombocytopenia; vasculitis”
and for hepatitis B
”Angioedema; apnoea; arthritis; encephalitis; encephalopathy; hypotension; meningitis; multiple sclerosis; muscle weakness; nerve disorders; paralysis; seizure; thrombocytopenia; vasculitis”
Yes, the he lies have started even before the inquiry has begun!
What lies?
These have been the definitions used in the BNF for the 15 years I worked in healthcare and I imagine for several years prior.
Baroness Heather Hallett, of 7/7 inquest fame?
Don’t waste my time.
It has been public knowledge for months that Lady Hallett is to chair this Inquiry, yet only now are there references to some perceived lack of competence to do so. Not on!
She a member of the Establishment ( now usually called the Deep State) that gave us the Covid fear/panic campaign, the mass injections of an untried Gene Therapy product and the Lockdown crisis – it is not so much competence at stake, as membership of the very Elite whose behaviour and motives she is supposed to be judging!
It used to be called “conflict of interest.” and I smell ‘safe pair of hands’!
You don’y seriously believe that the Johnson Government will allow any serious criticisms of individuals and policies, or startling revelations to be made, which would threaten political careers do you?
In the best tradition of Waterloo as usual , it will simply be be “close ranks and form a square”
Not to worry – the conclusions have already been written!
Epoch news covered the airline staff suffering injuries from this poison and they are becoming more vocal.
The suppression of peoples injury stories as well as those who are injured but deluded into thinking it wasn’t the jab is quite something.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/exclusive-pilots-injured-by-covid-vaccines-speak-out-i-will-probably-never-fly-again_4452922.html?utm_source=ai&utm_medium=search&slsuccess=1
Pilots have to have frequent medicals, including an ECG. The required frequency increases with age, so there should be a useful history of ECG records, 6 monthly in the older groups. An analysis of these would show onset of cardiac issues and if these were consequential to the gene therapy injections.
The we must assume that the analysis will not take place.
It’s called gene transfer technology
Inquiry?..Criminal investigations, followed by criminal trials…(yeah, I know..)
The very title shows their bad faith intentions.
What is heat smell already? Oh yes fresh Whitewash!
The increasingly powerful Deep Sate will protect itself from the unvarnished truth.
Look out for “Lessons to be Learned” and ‘no one to blame’. Howevevr with ‘bargain basement paints’ the stains always show through and many coats will be required!
With some luck, I will be able to meet my parents again this year for the first time since 2019. How about covering that? Families torn apart as health & safety measure, implemented by people who either don’t have living relatives anymore or who had a long holiday in their family home. Brought to you by the conservative and unionist party on behalf of the CCP whose superior wisdom is till being trumpeted by the WHO, despite the Chinese open air experiment went decidedly pear-shaped meanwhile.
The conclusion should be that The original plan would have worked without even a tweak, the meddling and peddling caused the problems
They will be getting desperate to quietly ditch the Yellow Card stats.
Perhaps Dorries will have the answer, buried deep in her On-Iine Harms Bill?
After all the stats ‘harm ‘ the Government .
What is that smell already? Oh yes fresh Whitewash!
The increasingly powerful Deep State will protect itself from the unvarnished truth.
Look out for “Lessons to be Learned” and ‘no one to blame’. However with ‘bargain basement paints’ the stains always show through and many coats will be required!
If this was a real inquiry the Dame may want to ask why during the period of mass detentions a GCHQ unit was moved into Downing Street
The unit was to report directly to the dictator
Why?
I suspect the units role was to spy on lockdown dissidents and the political opponents and allies of the dictator
They got rid of Cummings et al by creating the false ‘chatty rat’ story and making them surrender their phones
How did they know where to look?
Just saying
You should be an investigative journalist.
Oh dear I forgot … we don’t have them now.
Still UK Column might be interested in that snpippet. They have a chap there who’s an ex- spook.
Absolutely no way any families should receive a penny in compensation. The idiots all signed the waiver and took the jab, these are the consequences
What about those for whom it was get the jab or lose your job?
The real crime there is the politicians that made that policy, they should be hanged. I have sympathy for those who lost their jobs, I lost my income and was given zero aid too….but they still signed the disclaimer and took the jab.
Let them sue their employers. Why should I pay?
They all signed waivers, bloody hell, I didn’t realise that. No wonder many aren’t complaining.
So the pharmaceutical firms are protected due to the ‘non vaccine’ gene therapy drugs being experimental, the government are protected by requiring recipients signing a waiver. The recipients, tricked by the gene therapy drug being called a vaccine are not protected at all, I don’t think so. I would say 53,000,000 people here were misled into believing it was a vaccine. Someone should be sued.
Fraudulent Misrepresentation from the outset. People are familiar with the word ‘vaccine’ and how it is part of childhood and for travelling to certain countries, but, they weren’t familiar with ‘gene therapies’ and their possible long term effects, let alone the short term, almost immediate negative outcomes.
I don’t believe there was a ‘signed waiver’. Plus lies were told so it was all conducted under false pretenses. Other pressures were also applied.
The next question then is, was there a requirement to sign a waiver or not? If there was a waiver, did it include the words ‘Vaccine’ and in what context? this is not a vaccine? If there was no waiver, what exactly were recepients told. Are you suggesting the vaccinators made up their own narrative?
While multiple studies have shown Covid vaccines to be safe – with more than 53 million Britons having had at least one dose and nearly 40 million receiving three – a small minority of people suffered serious health problems including blood clots and inflammation in the heart.
Any honest frontline doctor may care to disagree.
I have seen scores of adverse effects, some severe, with anecdotal evidence of quite a few suspicious deaths shortly after vaccination.
Steve Kirsch suggests no more than 1 in 41 adverse drug effects are reported to VAERS in the USA.
I have seen many as well, and reported them via Yellow Cards. Bell’s Palsy, Central Retinal Vein Occlusions, CVA’s.
I have also noticed the numbers declining sharply as vaccination uptake has fallen.
At work I am treated as an extremist to be humoured.
I have kept the letter threatening me with the sack for refusing the booster.
“Very rare…..” Sure. I know many people who have suffered serious side effects but not one who has died from the virus.
I still don’t know anyone who has had the coof. I really must get out more.
The outcome seems to have been already decided. When you start of from the position that side effects are very rare before you look, it doesn’t promise to be unbiassed.
Any idea of how many people die per week as a baseline?
Of course you don’t.
Well it is about 1 in 5000, each week.
Now compare your above post with this and watch your logic vanish in front of your eyes.
Do you get paid double time on a Sunday?
I try to teach you, as a public survice.
So why don’t you look into my 1 in 5000 figure and tell me if this is likely to be true.
If you can find an error, then you have a case.
🫡 Reporting for survice SIR!
Well done for spotting the typo.
Have a go at the factual element now.
I offer this education for free.
Ha ha! I like that you’ve got a sense of humour!
Of course we all do. Whatever has all cause death rate got to do with it. It would be more useful if you could quote the average weekly deaths from vaccine side effects by vaccine type, and the deaths from ill-advised medical interventions.
Try comparing to reported side-effects from any other “vaccine” and there’s obviously a huge problem.
Joel Smalley laid out this morning out how the highest reporting countries in Europes have under-reported, at a minimum, by a factor of 7.2x.
I wonder if the life insurance companies in The City of London will help the “enquiry” in some way? Plenty of evidence outside the sovereign state too.
The fact that he quoted a minimum factor to an accuracy of 2 significant figures, means you can reject the work.
You will have to educate us all about how you came to that conclusion.