African Governments to Western Eco-Imperialists Who Tell Them Not to Drill Their Own Oil and Gas – Get Lost
It was never going to work. Telling African countries to stop developing their economies by banning cheap, reliable fossil fuel is little more than an eco-imperialist dream. Writing in Monday’s Daily Telegraph, Uganda President Yoweri Museveni lauded the discovery of oil in Lake Albert, but noted it was a battleground for the green NGOs and activists who claim that Armageddon is nigh at every opportunity.
“We are accustomed to these lectures, but we are tired of hearing them,” he added.
For the last decade, the West through the IMF and the World Bank has imposed a moratorium on support for African fossil fuel development – initially coal and more recently oil and gas as well. Museveni notes that in Africa the population is set to double by 2050, “and it is becoming increasingly clear that our energy needs cannot be met with a sudden shift to more expensive and less reliable solar and wind alone”.
Rich Western eco elites, of course, argue that the world must rid itself of fossil fuel as soon as possible. They believe the world is facing climate breakdown, although as articles in the Daily Sceptic show on a regular basis, that belief is backed by surprisingly few scientific facts. These Western elites effectively seek a command-and-control economy based on Net Zero, and a neo-pagan return to ancient Gaia goddess worship that elevates nature as sacred and denigrates humanity as destructive of it.
It might all play better in Africa if so-called global warming could be detected.

Atmospheric warming over the last 40 years has been more pronounced over the northern hemisphere, despite regular scare stories appearing about equatorial regions becoming uninhabitable. The GISS temperature database is run by NASA, and as with similar datasets it has been subject to considerable recent modifications, with the past cooled and later results warmed. Without these retrospective data adjustments, global recorded warming ran out of steam nearly two decades ago. Nevertheless, the contrast between the north, painted in fiery red, and most of Africa is clear from the GISS map (above).
The Lake Albert project is going ahead following a $10bn investment from the China National Offshore Oil Corporation and Total Energies of France. It includes the building of a 900 mile pipeline to the port of Tanga. According to Real Clear Energy, the project will provide $48.5m in annual payments to Ugandan employees living in one of the least developed countries in the world. But opposition is fierce. Writing in the New York Times the local green agitator Vanessa Nakate of StopEACOP said the project would bring “poverty and destruction to the people of Africa”. It is claimed by her activist group that building the East African crude oil pipeline would tip the world closer to “full blown climate catastrophe”.
It is comments such as these which mostly surface in mainstream media, rather than those of the President of Uganda. It might also be thought that most Africans are less impressed with other solutions advanced in the West to solve any problems caused by growing populations. Sir David Attenborough is on record as stating humans are a plague on the Earth, and it was “barmy” to send food to Ethiopia to solve the famine crisis. In Attenborough’s view, sending flour bags to under-developed countries was pointless.
In public in the West, many African politicians pay lip service to the aims of COP, not least because plenty of aid cash is on offer. Others take a more challenging and outspoken view. N.J. Ayuk is the Executive Chairman of the African Energy Chamber and he recently called the idea that you could develop Africa with handouts, “preposterous and sickening”.
He continued: “You cannot take people of any colour and exempt them from the requirements of civilisation – including work, free markets, behavioural standards, personal responsibility, fossil fuels, financial literacy and all the other basic things that the clever intelligentsia disdain – without ruinous consequences to them and society at large.”
In his view, no country has ever been developed by fancy wind and green hydrogen. Africans see oil and gas as a path to success and a solution to their problems. “The demonisation of oil and gas companies will not work,” he added.
Writing in 2015, the former Chancellor of the Exchequer Nigel Lawson commented that something deep inside the human psyche makes it receptive to apocalyptic warnings. By a cruel irony, he said, too many climate scientists and their hangers-on have become the high priests of a new age of unreason. Asking developing countries to abandon the cheapest available sources of energy is, at the very least, asking them to delay the conquest of malnutrition, to perpetuate the incidence of preventable diseases and to increase the number of premature deaths.
“Global warming orthodoxy is not merely irrational. It is wicked,” he concluded.
Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
I hope for their sake they don’t find too much oil, otherwise they will be getting a visit from Uncle Sam to make them an offer they can’t refuse.
If they refuse that offer, then a military coup might happen, and if that fails then a US led task force will have to install democracy, because of human rights violations or some such virtuous act.
Too late; read where the money to develop it is coming from… China. Africa is being bought piecemeal by China, who are playing the long game. Chinese agri films have been buying up grazing and arable farms in South America for a decade.
Buying it is so much easier and less lethal than attacking it. It makes me wonder if it might not have been better for Putin to buy the independence of the east of Ukraine by paying Zelensky for it in cash.
Plus the odd bit of real estate in Australia too. Eg, the port of Darwin.
… and Barbados.
And several other ports on islands in the South Seas.
yep, the Chinese, nobly assisted by our French friends.
Such magnanimity!
And the west stood by and let it happen
China may be buying up Africa piecemeal (they already lease vast swathes of agri Africa for years too) but they’ll suffer the same fate as the Europeans, or any colonising force anywhere eventually.
In future the Chinese may well scupper their own imperial plans getting bogged down in conflicts over delusional visions of foreign control.
Empire Of Dust
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LSuZGlqL34
Too late – Uncle Sam is already all over uganda
Reminds me of Star Trek discovery when they met the Klingons,
https://youtu.be/-XTce38ef98?t=60
It’s not racism when the climate change woke are behind it.
Yeah, you can imagine the outrage from Vanessa Nakate if a white Western leader had told them not to do it.
The Western Eco Elite would do better to focus their attention on the predicted doubling of Africa’s population. Now THAT would be a catastrophe.
Do you mean the world’s population would no longer fit into Texas?
….but I don’t want to live in Texas.
Dig a cubic mile and all the humans in world would fit in, with space to spare.
Or they could stand on Zanzibar.
Sounds like London.
No doubt Europe will be able and willing to accommodate any overspill. However, I’m not sure that, if living standards improve there, large numbers of Africans will want to relocate to a continent that has ruined itself through “eco-friendliness” and poisoned its peoples with fake “vaccines”.
There’s a body of evidence that DDT is effectively banned in Africa (by being tied to US aid money) not because it’s dangerous, but because it’s effective. Malaria (and AIDS) are viewed more as solutions than problems.
Or the association between DDT and polio has been taken into account.
Too late for that.
Most of the population of sub-Saharan Africa is aged under 25, i.e. on the verge of having children (if not already pregnant). They know from bitter experience to avoid US billionaires bearing ‘vaccines’.
Mercifully Uganda largely escaped the mRNA vax mandates, with a few exceptions such as teachers. COVID ran through the country a couple of times (delta and omicron) in a blink-and-you’ll-miss-it way. Medically pointless lockdowns led to soaring child malutrition, schools more or less closed for 2 years, and blood supplies, which in sub-Saharan Africa are mainly needed for transfusions of small children, were drastically reduced because they are normally collected from schools. Bill G tries to argue that better healthcare will lead to a lower birth rate; a correlation can be found if you pick your timeframe and geography carefully, but the real correlation is with rising wealth.
Meanwhile the clueless large development charities were campaigning for cheap mRNA vaccines for low income countries!
100%!!!
Bozo has 650 million doses he can donate. At least it’s a start.
I don’t follow your reasoning.
In the long run the best form of contraception is economic development, and economic development can only be achieved with cheap reliable energy from fossil fuels. In general the countries with the lowest birth rates are those with the highest per capita GDP that were able to use fossil fuels to develop before the modern scourge of environmentalism. If Western eco nutters are concerned about overpopulation then they should support economic development in Africa as this is the only thing that will ultimately lead to a slow down in the rate of population growth.
“Eco-imperialists” …I just call them eco-Nazis, but it’s much the same idea.
Not to be confused with an econonazis, they are just cheap skinheads.
It seems the African leaders can teach the western leaders a few things
They certainly did at Isandlwana.
I met a Zulu in London almost twenty years ago. A kinder, wiser and stronger chap you never could meet.
Are the people who think it’s OK to instruct Africans not to improve their wealth and living standards by exploiting their natural resources the same ones who signal their virtue by pulling down statues of anyone they can tenuously link to historical slavery?
Their hypocrisy is breathtaking.
They do share the feature of smug self-righteousness.
When you’ve got that, anything is possible; and hypocrisy is the sin of other people (inferiors).
Good. Uganda should put Uganda first. Although I hope President Museveni can trust his security detail and doctors, because resisting the orders from the Davos has been very injurious to the health of African leaders recently.
Hahaha…was just going to put that I expect a coup or news of his ‘untimely death’ any time soon!!
If the West does not want to invest in Africa, then you can be sure that China will happily oblige.
Renting them 21st century technology with 19th century colonial attitudes regarding the ability of Africans to govern themselves. Don’t expect benevolent rulership by the nation that requires de-blacking film posters.
That could have been the UK and the US 50 or 60 years ago.
Sounds like a conspiracy, those bumbling cock-up theorists are spreading misinformation! There should be a law against that!
Independent of climate change considerations it is naïve to expect this pipeline to benefit the people of Uganda. There is a long history of African countries suffering from the resource curse. Oil and other natural resources do more harm than good to the local people as the profits are absorbed by foreign companies and local corruption while investment is directed away from local industry, people are ejected from their homes, and their environment is degraded. Some governments of integrity such as Botswana have managed this kind of situation but sadly Uganda does not fall into this category.
Some of it trickles down. All those golden toilets in their rulers’ palaces don’t clean themselves.
Neither did Botswana…….
When he says “We are accustomed to these lectures, but we are tired of hearing them,” President Musuveni speaks for me.
Good to know that Africa (parts of it at least) are looking to get out from under the new western paternalism.
Yes.
But the danger is they will be indebted to and re-colonized by the Chinese.
Reminds me when the USA was telling Brazil not to chop down the Amazon and Brazil informing the USA that they have chopped down 90+% of their own natural forests.
Can he come and run our country please? We need someone who knows what they are talking about.
It won’t be long until one of his people is running the UK, I’d be careful what you wish for
It would certainly be different.
I promise you, you don’t want “M7”, as they call Museveni locally, to run the country. To quote from the Wikipedia article about him:
None of the Ugandan elections of the last 30 years (since 1986) have been found to be free and transparent.[7] On 16 January 2021 the Electoral Commission found that Museveni appointed himself,[8] announcing himself as the winner having won 58.6% of the vote, despite many videos and reports that show ballot box stuffing,[9] over 400 polling stations with 100% voter turnout,[10] and human rights violations.[11][12]
So that’s where the Democrats got the idea.
The Democrats are past masters at cheating.
Quite how the narrative has been changed to the Democrats being the representative of the US black community, when they were the one’s who encouraged the KKK in the deep south, and the Republican party was founded to eliminate racism, is one of the great puzzles of our century.
Are you referring to the last US presidential election? If so, there is zilch evidence of significant electoral fraud (there may be a few suspect votes in some states but nowhere close enough to influence the outcome and with no particular bias). Every serious effort to investigate fraud has been thrown out as laughable. All we have is blog posts and wild conspiracy theories. I get a bit heated about this because Trump’s campaign attacks the fundamentals of US democracy (which is in trouble anyway) as it weakens the belief of the people in the outcome. Basically he is prepared to throw democracy under the bus to further his own ends.
The MSM came out in lockstep to quote “there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud” in the 2020 US election”. There wasn’t. There was just enough fraud in key counties to sway key states over to the Democratic side. Boxes and boxes of votes almost 100% Democrat votes arriving in the middle of the night? Trump was coasting to victory until the 11th hour, but suddenly just enough votes in just the right places turned up when counting should have stopped. If there is a fair election this year Biden will get crushed.
I am sorry but this is just wrong. I think you have been misled by some of your sources. There weren’t boxes and boxes of almost 100% democratic votes. The votes that got counted later – mostly mail in votes – were more Democratic (but nothing like 100%) than the in person voting which was counted earlier – this was completely expected. It happened in most, possibly all, states not just swing states. They just drew attention in swing states for obvious reasons.
Enquiries into voter fraud have found a negligible number of possible cases (e.g. 26 cases in Pennsylvania – not all Democrat – Biden won by 80,000).
Not to defend Trump, I dislike the flavour of bleach you see, and I havent personally assessed the sources in the below link, but Trump was awfully popular and got the largest vote on record.
Yet despite not campaigning past 2pm and with a tsunami of gaffes Biden apparently topped this, for an even larger vote record.
Trump derangement syndrome would have picked up a number of voters, but a double record from a part-time campaigner and unremarkable political lifer?
It would require a leap of faith to credit this outcome at the best of times, but then there are the many varied anomalies, and an indepth justification featured in Time magazine on why the result had to be ‘fortified’ by the leftwing establishment apparatus. The same cadre that had for Trumps entire presidency deployed every establishment apparatchik asset to invent entirely false smear campaigns throughout.
This and far more statistical, symbolic circumstantial evidence (almost all cases are tried on circumstantial evidence) must push the rational mind towards the notion that, seen as a balance of probabilities, the fix was in?
It wasn’t the first time and won’t be the last.
https://hereistheevidence.com/
Surely this is circular reasoning? Biden can’t have got that many votes because people like him don’t get that many votes. Remember the polls consistently gave Biden a lead before the election.
Wikipedia is notoriously, rabidly left wing. Even one of its founders (now resigned) has condemned it as such.
Fine for some historic fact, but never trust anything that’s written there on current affairs.
I can’t recall his name but there is one individual who, scandalously, seeks out climate articles and alters them or just deletes them, contrary to Wikipedia’s own policies, but with their full knowledge. He boasts to have altered thousands over the years.
William Connolley (aka stoat) he was a climate modeller before he got a real job.
That’s the one.
Do you mean that some of the things I copied from Wikipedia are false despite the references? A left or right wing bias is irrelevant if it is a simple statement of fact with supporting references.
One of your references was directly back to Wikipedia. One was to ‘Human Rights Watch’, another to Al Jazeera.
The other was to PesaCheck described as: “PesaCheck is East Africa’s first public finance fact-checking initiative.”
Great! You found a Fact Checking organisation to support your argument as well as bunch of leftists outlets, all with political agenda’s.
Only you didn’t. It’s hardly evidence when you cite links from the article itself, particularly from Wikipedia, which can be edited by anyone.
Nor can I find any details of who posted this, what their credentials are, where they are from, or anything else about them. It could have been you for all I know.
So – do you think Uganda has had a free and transparent election since 1986?
Iv’e never given it a moments thought since Amin was kicked out.
Nor was it my point. Using circular references from Wikipedia was my point.
When was the last time the USA had a free and transparent election?
“….the East African crude oil pipeline would tip the world closer to “full blown climate catastrophe”.”
But, but, I thought the experts had told us that the “full blown climate catastrophe” had already arrived?
This really encapsulates the hypocrisy and insanity of these ridiculous eco-mental-ists; the crisis, such as it is, is always just around the corner and has been for the last 50 years.
It’s a shame we can’t join the Africans in telling these bastards to get lost
That may well be on the horizon.
There is a boil about to be lanced.
Putin has, quite literally, rolled a grenade into the room of globalism, and the west is frantically kicking it about between them.
There is only one man on this planet capable of sorting this crap out, and he’s waiting in the wings.
African countries cannot rely on solar (and wind) but apparently we can.
Well I never.
First the Indians get uppity with their judiciary upholding rights to bodily autonomy and now Uganda tells Globocrap to feck off.
Emergency Commonwealth conference on the way led by Lord, His Most Majestic, Supremely Divine, The Imperial Grace, Head of the Church of (a bit) of England, and Chief Ranger, Windsor Park:
Prince Charlie Boy Windsor.
Hail!
Stand by your beds.
It’s sad, really. I used to think that PC was at least well-meaning, if not outstandingly bright. He didn’t seem to see the contradictions in much of what he spouted. But I defended him, nevertheless, as I’ve always been a Royalist, and I wanted to believe in his being honourable, at least…..
Then he appeared front of stage for the WEF. ”Ah,” I thought, ”he’s been chosen as a useful idiot to lend respectability to their evil cause…. ”
Then, gradually, I realised……
Jim Yong Kim was the President of the World Bank until 2019 when Trump kicked him out.
He dealt with finance for Africa in a unique way. When they told him they wanted to develop fossil fuel energy because renewables weren’t suitable for them, but they needed money to explore and drill for oil/coal etc. he refused.
He gave the money to the Chinese instead.
Once again, Orange man Bad!
If they truly cared about global warming then they’d be pushing for greater investments in wind and solar in the most poorest countries so its a real alternative to fossil fuels instead of letting so called renewables duke it out with cheap recycled stuff from the west. even subsidising the newest greenest fossil fuel powered equipment from cars to busses to trains to electrical generation would have a huge impact on global carbon emissions. instead of nibbling away at the 1% of emissions from the uk they should be looking at the 30% from china and getting that reduced, 1% from 30% should be easier and more rewarding than 0.1% from an already efficient system. as for Attenborough, it sickens me to hear his comments on the Ethiopian famine but doesn’t surprise me. not sure his comments would apply if the same thing happened in the UK or Europe. Ethiopia had a smaller population than the uk during that famine, but far larger land mass. the greenwash is all virtue signalling. send all the old euro 4+ Vehicles to port nations enduring their old vehicles are removed in exchange and their co2 emissions would plummet, achieving far more % co2… Read more »
What harm has CO2 ever done to you? Or anyone else for that matter? CO2 has been proven to do nothing but green the planet, by 14% over 35 years of satellite observations. There is not a single, credible, empirical, scientific study which demonstrates atmospheric CO2 causes the planet to warm. Not one. The IPCC itself tells us ‘extreme’ weather is no worse than it ever was. So what possible use would your ‘recommendations’ have other than to impoverish people? Which is happening right now since Biden stalled US shale production and oil exploration which manifested itself as immediate, global inflation. Subsidies also impoverish people as they are derived from taxpayers. Your energy bill has about 25% stealth taxes applied to it to subsidise renewable energy. If renewables are soo good why do they need such massive subsidies? Instead of reliably producing 30% of the UK’s electricity, it’s been producing between 5% – 10% over the last week or so with no prospect of improving over the coming weeks. The world is currently 7 years and 7 months without any warming whatsoever, yet atmospheric CO2 has been rising steadily. How does that work. And until someone can figure out precisely… Read more »
You only emit less co2 by burning less fuel, less fuel means your saving money, poorer nations saving money is a good thing.
Buying expensive new stuff to save a little bit of fuel is not saving money, the west subsidising newer stuff to help poorer nations save fuel will save them money which is a good thing.
moan all you want, reducing co2 is not all about putting less in the atmosphere, there is a lot about saving money as your not consuming as much to start with, the west gets brain washed that it’s only ecology factors why co2 emissions should be curbed, their are valid economic factors too that have far greater impact to developing nations.
A good read is ”Fake Invisible Catastrophes And Threats Of Doom” by Patrick Moore (ex of Greenpeace rather than the stars). As he points out, there is no correlation between the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and the Earth’s temperatures through millennia. He attempts to provide answers, at least.
Why don’t these ‘eco’ dimwits ask the question why the operators of greenhouses actually increase CO2 to give higher yields? I doubt they know.
Global warming!
Don’t worry Bill Gates has a vaccine for that.
‘Museveni notes that in Africa the population is set to double by 2050,’
Invest in dinghy manufacturers if you only care about cash.
Invest in new politicians if you want to keep your country with the indegenous population.
“Rich eco-elites…..believe the world is facing climate breakdown.”
They don’t believe that at all.
They think we are so stupid as to believe it.
More great writing Chris, you’re a credit to this website.
”Eco elites”…..
Now THERE’s an oxymoron if ever there was one.
Love Nigel Lawson, trouble is anyone talking sense nowadays just gets slammed.
No, it’s not governments who decide this or that; governments do and say what the jewish bankers tells them to do and say, and if in the 21st century you still believe it’s governments who rule nations, you are still pretty much brainwashed.
Who own ALL the ‘national’ and international banks?
The only people on earth having a ‘great plan’ to establish a global dictatorship which they call a “Universal Republic”!
The jewish Luciferian cabalist bankers and international jewry – and remember, to criticize isn’t the same as to hate, alright?