Climate Change Saves Over Half a Million Lives in England and Wales, Says ONS – Not a Word From the Press

Over half a million fewer people died in England and Wales over the last 20 years due to a small rise in temperatures, according to recent work by the Office for National Statistics. According to the ONS, reduced climate-related mortality rates were 90% attributable to milder winters and 10% to warmer summers. Over three times the number of lives were extended due to climate change than are said to have been lost in the Covid pandemic.

In the mainstream media, the news was greeted with a deafening silence. There were few reports highlighting the lives saved. The BBC didn’t even mention the half million figure, but noted: “Hot days saw more injuries, violence and suicide but the relatively small rise in deaths was offset by warmer winter temperatures.” The third paragraph of the story claimed: “Climate change is a substantial threat to human health globally.” Resident green activist Justin Rowlatt then supplied an “analysis”, noting immediately that “statistics can be slippery, as these new climate-death figures show”.

For some inexplicable reason, there was no 5pm Downing Street press conference announcing that nearly 30,000 lives a year had been saved by climate change. There was no Professor Ferguson-inspired model suggesting that if current trends were followed, everyone in the world would be saved by teatime next Tuesday.

What there was, as we can see from the BBC example, was a desperate attempt to fit the story into an pre-arranged green agenda. The work continues. Last month, researchers from UCL and the University of Reading said that the death rate linked to extreme temperatures would increase significantly under global warming of 2°C. But seemingly with one eye on the unfortunate ONS findings, the researchers had to note that: “At current global warming of around 1.2°C we see a slight decrease in temperature-related mortality in winter and a minimal net effect in summer, meaning that overall, at this level of warming we see a slight decrease in temperature related mortality rate.” Professor Andrew Charlton-Perez went on to claim: “Limiting the average global rise in temperature is likely to have substantial benefits for the overall health of the population.”

In the land of ‘settled’ science and agenda-driven politics, half a million lives extended due to climate change is a “slight decrease” in mortality, while a third of that total (if that) for Covid deaths is cue for a two-year horror lockdown, leading to huge economic, educational, health and societal problems.

A major difficulty with catastrophising climate change for largely political Net Zero purposes is that most of the observable effects from recent warming and CO2 rises have been beneficial. Rising carbon dioxide levels have caused a massive greening of the planet, leading to an estimated 14% extra vegetation over the last 30 years. This has alleviated food shortages and famine in many parts of the world. Dr. Roy Spencer, the former senior scientist for climate studies at NASA, notes that plants benefit from higher levels of CO2, adding: “It is amazing how little there is in the atmosphere.” In the northern hemisphere, growing seasons have been slightly extended. Wildlife of all descriptions is more likely to survive slightly less cold winters.

Levels of CO2 have been much higher in the past, leading to abundant life and vigorous plant growth, a small part of which is now releasing past sequestered CO2 by humans burning fossil fuel. Current global temperatures are also on the low side but sub-tropical humans have learnt to cope and thrive in the cooler latitudes as the last ice age subsided. As we have seen from the ONS figures, cold is a much greater threat to human survival than heat.

Global warming actually ran out of steam about two decades ago, whatever the recently upward-adjusted temperature databases say. Climate models guessing imminent temperature rises of 6°C are simply laughable, while catastrophising bad weather as extreme and blaming it on humans is just a creative opinion, and has no basis in science.

History teaches us that the ‘end of the world is nigh’ crowd will always be with us, preaching their cults du jour and controlling political agendas. But at least with warmer days extending our lives we can enjoy it while it lasts – and while they let us.

Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

78 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
huxleypiggles
3 years ago

“There was no Professor Ferguson-inspired model suggesting that if current trends were followed, everyone in the world would be saved by teatime next Tuesday.”

What a great way to end the article.

There are doubtless going to be a few people working in the MSM absolutely spewing at this.

Sadly one or more P45’s could be arriving on some ONS desks.

Great piece.👍

mwhite
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

They might just alter the data

https://rumble.com/v12z5ow-cold-..-is-the-new-hot.html

crisisgarden
3 years ago

Ha ha ha! Narrative paradox malfunction! Abort! Abort! 🤖

RedhotScot
3 years ago
Reply to  crisisgarden

Congratulations, you have won the post of the week as far as I’m concerned.

crisisgarden
3 years ago
Reply to  RedhotScot

It would be paradoxical were it not for the fact that killing elderly people is the new saving elderly people.

rockoman
rockoman
3 years ago
Reply to  crisisgarden

Here’s another case of ‘narrative paradox malfunction’:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMHQJ1Er8xA

2 minute video.

Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  rockoman

Absolutely brilliant. Guy is a genius. By giving airtime to the “this is offensive to women” people they insult Muslims and tacitly acknowledge multiculturalism fails. A rare narrative dysfunction indeed. But also a kind of insight into how easily it does fail.

eastender53
3 years ago
Reply to  rockoman

Is everyone in that town too stupid to understand the message or did they only include the dumb ones?

crisisgarden
3 years ago
Reply to  rockoman

That clip just made me squirt water out of my nose on the treadmill! Abosolutelt priceless, with the music providing a wonderfully dramatic sound bed to the absolute fucking coo-coo nonsense eating itself 🤣

crisisgarden
3 years ago
Reply to  rockoman

Save the elderly!
Use more carbon!
Would be the corollary I think?

Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  crisisgarden

No, save yourself would be. Long before 2100 you’ll be elderly. A few degrees will give you a longer life. Don’t die early so billionaires can make money from wind energy subsidies! You deserve better!

DanClarke
DanClarke
3 years ago

As we apparently have at least 10,000 deaths each winter in the UK from hypothermia, a rise of a few degrees could do a lot of good, bring it on.

Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  DanClarke

That’s their nightmare scenario, people realising the way out of this is not to fight the data and argue it is wrong, it won’t get warmer etc. It is to sell the benefits of a warmer world. A few degrees by 2100 would be great.

It is also a blindspot our illustrious elites are prone to. They are either too young or too wealthy to understand that for many winter is death.

RedhotScot
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

A man after my own heart.

There is no point in explaining science to people who don’t understand it (see my earlier comment) yet climate sceptics are convinced this is the route to follow (see my second last point of my last post).

The left, masters of propaganda that they are, have used that and not science to scare the witless, witless.

Time is long overdue that we return the favour with our propaganda.

Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  RedhotScot

I am only just coming to this realisation. The war is about emotive narrative not facts. This is the flaw and therefore the opportunity.

You don’t win the climate war with arcane arguments about measurement flaws, heat sinks distorting temperatures, or some nominal argument about the little ice age. You ask them if you think your gran deserves an extra 18 months of life in a warmer world. And who are these monsters who want her to die a cold, lonely death?

It is comforting to assume you are using data because it makes you feel right. But the wreckers really are just blundering their way through with emotive claptrap.

Star
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

Muttering about data is similar to wearing a sandwich board in the amount of understanding about propaganda that it shows.

Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  Star

It is a recent revelation for me. Clinging to facts or truth is comforting even when it fails.

Perhaps this is why the society wreckers do so well. Factoids are used only when they support the predefined narrative.

watersider
3 years ago
Reply to  RedhotScot

Well put Red and Fax, but if it’s propaganda you seek, look no further than the newer, better washes whiter, outfit coming soon from the Senile Joe O’ Bama stable in America.
The new head of the Disinformation Club is a dozey.Long term Marxist she ticks all the boxes.
Then we will soon have our own revamped improved Propaganda department courtesy of Boris.
BTW when glancing at a headline the other day ‘Boris sentenced to 2± years in prison’ my little heart raced. So sad to hear it was some tennis player instead.

tree
3 years ago
Reply to  RedhotScot

AT least you admit it is propaganda.

NeilParkin
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

Its the wealth of benefits we will get from Aberdeen being as warm as Manchester is today….

Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

Yes, precisely.

rockoman
rockoman
3 years ago

Conversely:

If we had acted sooner and ‘stopped this climate change’, then that would have cost half a million lives.

RedhotScot
3 years ago

Current global temperatures are also on the low side

A masterly understatement. The world has never been simultaneously as cold, with suppressed levels of CO2, in it’s history.

Carbon_Dioxide_Geological_4600mya_.jpeg
Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  RedhotScot

Amazing how they get away with zooming in to a tiny bit of a trend and broadcasting it.

RedhotScot
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

Not amazing at all. 90%+ of the planet’s occupants have no higher education in science.

Most simply lack the ability to critically analyse anything.

Many have no common sense whatsoever.

And many simply lack the ability to apply the simplest of sanity checks to any situation they encounter.

Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  RedhotScot

I fear you are correct. I’m sure I don’t need to mention two years of covidmania. As time goes on it gets harder to blame the propaganda alone.

Star
3 years ago
Reply to  RedhotScot

In Britain, “people” such as double glazing salesmen and other professional door-canvassing scammers of that kind are taught to ignore possible targets who are Polish, British Asian, black British, etc., and to concentrate on white Brits who are viewed as generally speaking more likely to be gullible to the point of being susceptible to ideas such as “I’ll try my hardest to get you a good deal”, “I can get you this price, but my boss says it’s only available if you agree the credit arrangement right now”, etc.

I seem to remember it was Piers “C***” Morgan who said if you want to persuade a person, send someone round to their house who speaks with a public-school accent.

RedhotScot
3 years ago
Reply to  Star

I sold double glazing for a short time many years ago. We were never taught to ignore any member of the community as they all had a right to choose whether they wanted to improve their homes or not.

I think every house built today has double glazing, I don’t know too many older houses that don’t now have them retro fitted.

Pressure selling was an unfortunate tactic employed, but I honestly can’t think of a single house which had their DG units ripped out and replaced with single glazing.

Strange ‘scam’, don’t you think?

Vaxtastic
3 years ago

The underlying issue is not climate change, or even the lopsided narrative. It is we are now obviously ruled by a small group of people at every level, local, regional and national. This extends into the private sector with any firm above a certain size sure to contain senior people who will generally support and broadcast the current narrative.

It is the total lack of mechanisms to stop this. In my area we don’t even have a mechanism to prevent a similar tiny group condemning street names and statues which they intend to destroy in the name of decolonisation. Every councillor and apparatchik supports this. They represent thick layers of bureaucracy with which to protect themselves.

It is the emasculation that worries me the most. We seem powerless and facts are irrelevant.

I despair of how we ended up here.

RedhotScot
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

The rush to ‘U’ turn will be amusing.

And it will happen, it always does.

Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  RedhotScot

You mean a backlash against all these woke initiatives?

rockoman
rockoman
3 years ago
Reply to  Vaxtastic

The backlash will come with with economic change – hyperinflation and a new monetary system.

The template is the fall of the Soviet Union.

Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  rockoman

I can imagine toppling statues will be low down on the list of preoccupations when you don’t know where you next meal is coming from.

RedhotScot
3 years ago
Reply to  rockoman

Whilst I largely agree with the first part of your post, dream on about the second. It’s not the Russian economy that’s in trouble, it’s the west’s.

A Heretic
A Heretic
3 years ago
Reply to  RedhotScot

You may have missed it but the Soviet Union fell some time ago.

RedhotScot
3 years ago
Reply to  A Heretic

Where did I mention the Soviet Union?

rockoman
rockoman
3 years ago
Reply to  RedhotScot

Sure, I was comparing the West today with the Soviet Union then.

RedhotScot
3 years ago
Reply to  rockoman

Fair point.

Star
3 years ago
Reply to  rockoman

There is talk of the rouble soon getting pegged to gold. If it happens, I doubt it will last long.

Since the real hyperinflation of the early 1920s, the highest annual inflation in Russia was in 1992 when it was only about 2300%. That may sound a lot, but it’s no more than 30% a month. For recent real hyperinflation, see Venezuela and Zimbabwe.

The middle classes in Britain won’t know what’s hit them… “What happened to our savings?” etc.

BTW anybody who is partial to sunflower oil should buy themselves some whacking big bottles of it, and fast.

Nearhorburian
Nearhorburian
3 years ago
Reply to  Star

I’ve bought lard and duck fat.

Much healthier.

Hopeless - "TN,BN"
3 years ago
Reply to  Nearhorburian

This part of the country is smothered in rape (canola), and it’s good stuff. Unfortunately, like a lot of previously inexpensive and unloved foodstuffs, such a trotters, cheeks, sprats and so on, it’s become trendy and dear.

RedhotScot
3 years ago

Vegetable oils produce Trans-Fats when heated, nasty stuff.

They only really became popular around 50 years ago, around the time cancers and allergies seemed to become more prolific.

I’m not suggesting they are the sole cause, we all began eating more processed food around then as well, but it’s something to consider knowing what we do about Trans-Fats.

huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  RedhotScot

With you 100%. I have been using some of these vegetable oils for many years and I believe I was wrong. Bizarrely I have been an advocate of butter all my life but did not apply the same logic to cooking fats.

Now back to lard, goose fat and beef dripping. And food tastes better too. Unctuousness.

The old bat
3 years ago
Reply to  Nearhorburian

Do you know, Tesco had actually sold out of lard today. They usually have piles of it. Funny how something that has been so reviled on (spurious) health grounds for years is now so popular.

Hugh
Hugh
3 years ago
Reply to  Star

Why did we come off the gold standard anyway, and was it ever adequately replaced?

tree
3 years ago
Reply to  rockoman

What are you trying to say?

thorsteinn@sjonarrond.is
thorsteinn@sjonarrond.is
3 years ago

If one of the main reasons for climate change is overpopulation, and if climate change then fuels overpopulation, again driving faster climate change, then we have a vicious cycle. But if that is so, we should perhaps revisit why we believe climate change is bad. If it helps reduce human mortality it is certainly not bad if the goal is the welfare of humans. And if the goal is not the welfare of humans, what is it then?
A problem is never a problem unless it prevents us from reaching a goal we have agreed upon. If the problem doesn’t prevent us from reaching the goal it is of no consequence, it is not relevant, it is not a real problem. The first step, therefore, must always be to state the goal in clear and unambiguous terms. Is it possible that the problem of climate change is an irrelevant problem that exists in our minds only because we haven’t got a clue what the goal is?

A passerby
A passerby
3 years ago

That makes perfect sense upto the goal part which requires our government coming up with a plan which will appease God knows how many people with an agenda to push. Climate change is both relevant and irrelevant depending on your point of view. It has become an exercise in navel-gazing, in my opinion.

RedhotScot
3 years ago

It has become very apparent that prosperity induces people to procreate less. The western world has a population problem OK, birth rates are falling concerningly.

As developing nations progress they will maintain high birth rates until they too are prosperous. By UN estimates human population will peak at around 9Bn in 2021, then sharply decline.

The fastest way to induce that decline would be to encourage developing nations to progress more quickly. That can be achieved by allowing them access to cheap, reliable fossil fuels to accelerate their prosperity.

NeilParkin
3 years ago
Reply to  RedhotScot

Female education is another key factor. Educated women have fewer children than uneducated women.

You are absolutely right about economic development. There are two halves to the world, one is educated, affluent and frankly never in the whole of human history has there been a better time to be alive. The other half is uneducated, poor and fragile, over using natural resources and procreating furiously. What kind of fool would suggest that we should deny them a chance at the first world, rather, that we should all join them in the third.

PhantomOfLiberty
PhantomOfLiberty
3 years ago

I do note that you have been arguing here that climate change is not real. I think 2003 was a stifling summer but the others were not remarkable – there have been some warm winters, not all. It’s interesting that they are attributing lesser mortality to warmer temperatures rather than health or social policies. I would have thought pretty impossible to pin down.

Star
3 years ago

Climate change in Britain is real. There has been no significant shift in temperatures, but over 50 years there has been a remarkable shift in the seasons, with many trees now blossoming months earlier than they did. Some trees that used to blossom in May or late April are now coming out in February.

RedhotScot
3 years ago
Reply to  Star

That’s significant, because?

Star
3 years ago

An excellent choice of photo by the DS picture editor! Poetically, “climate change” should evoke connotations that are mostly positive, especially in parts of the world where the climate is…shall we say…somewhat less than all-year-round wonderful.

“Change my climate, baby”, “Prepare for a climate change”, etc.

It’s not akin to “the atmosphere always changes when that guy enters a room”. “Atmosphere change” has negative connotations mostly.

Hugh
Hugh
3 years ago

It is indeed lovely to be living through this period of mild Winters (or would be if it wasn’t for all the other stuff), and all the stranger given its benefits to hear on Neil Oliver’s GB News show about plans to put masks on cows to reduce their methane output (apparently most of it comes out from their mouths rather than the other end), presumably based on some sort of computer modelling. However it is a period that may not last. I have heard a theory that there may in the coming years be a cooling period, even quite a severe cooling. I can’t remember the details, whether it is to do with magnetism or solar radiation or something else. Does anyone know more about this?

RedhotScot
3 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

From personal experience, there was an abrupt temperature rise in the western, northern hemisphere around 1972 – 1980.

Lochs across Scotland that were previously frozen wither playgrounds stopped freezing. Since then, very little has changed in my experience other than my garden in Kent now needs mowing twice a week rather than once every two weeks in the summer, compared to when we moved here 32 years ago.

Science isn’t simply screwing around with test tubes, satellites and computers, it’s an exercise in observation.

Annie
3 years ago

You can’t have it both ways.
Either climate change is not happening, and is bunk,
Or climate change is happening, but is beneficial.
Which do you prefer? Choose an alternative and stick to it.

Hugh
Hugh
3 years ago
Reply to  Annie

The climate is obviously changing. There was a medieval warm period; there was a mini “ice age”; there was a period of warming as we came out of that (particularly 1934 was warm); there was some coolng which led to fears of a new “ice age” in the 1970’s; there was another period of warming that became entangled with a fairly extreme political agenda; and apparently this warming has levelled off in the last couple of decades (the heat has got stored in the oceans allegedly).

Whether methane-stopping masks for cows and all the rest of it will make the slightest difference is debatable at best. However, what is fairly certain is that no serious cost-benefit analysis would support some of the “zero-carbon” type madness we are hearing from politicians and politicised groups such as the IPCC.

huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

Your time scales are far too short. Discussing climate change over a period of say 80 years is pointless. So 2003 was a warm Summer. 1975 and 1976 were long, very hot Summers for Britain. We haven’t seen their like since but that didn’t mean “climate change.”

RedhotScot
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Assuming CO2 is the problem, mankind’s emissions would take 25,000 years to raise the temperature of the planet by 2C.

We are a single flea on a dogs back.

tree
3 years ago
Reply to  RedhotScot

According to who?

Alter Ego
Alter Ego
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

There’s a genuine agreement in Australia that our summers seem to have shifted slightly: that December is cooler than it used to be, and February hotter. So summer feels more like January, February and March; and the shift continues throughout the year.

Apart from that, there’s argument.

RedhotScot
3 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

At every point in mankind’s history we have reliable evidence for, warm periods have been those of great benefit and great progress.

A warmer planet is moister, with more rainfall which benefits everything.

A colder planet is one where, unsurprisingly, more of the planets moisture is frozen causing droughts deserts and famine.

Great civilisations have risen and fallen with temperature.

tree
3 years ago
Reply to  Annie

Unless you live in a part of the globe where it is driving drought conditions.

Moderate Radical
3 years ago

This climate change propaganda came to my e-mail inbox a few weeks back. It was my son’s school’s weekly newsletter, and a child had written the part on climate change under the supervision of the headmistress. It was presented as the fruit of what the dear little ones had been ‘taught,’ so I got on the blower to the headmistress and politely challenged the assumptions being presented to my son as established facts. For example (I saved it all in a file): Sadly, we have something called climate change… We are responsible for this![…]This means our planet is geating up. Humans are warming Earth [sic] up by 1 degree Celsius. Outright propaganda and guilt politics aimed at primary school children. I asked the headmistress why she thinks it ‘sad’ that we have climate change, or global warming. I asked for her evidence that humans are solely responsible for the warming, and I said, regardless, why is this ‘bad’? I asked why she hadn’t informed the children that the 1 degree rise has occurred between around 1850 and the current day, giving the children a sense of perspective. It went on, but needless to say the headmistress folded like a cheap… Read more »

Hugh
Hugh
3 years ago

Sadly there is quite a lot more propaganda besides these issues that he is likely to be subjected to in our education system. I find it ironic that teachers who might object to some minimal Christian content in assemblies are nonetheless quite happy to repeat all manner of political propaganda in classes – and, most damagingly, pass off mere assertions as fact without properly telling both sides of a story. 2016 must have been a terrible year for many of these teachers…

Vaxtastic
3 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

Because they are rewarded for doing so. The only way to fix it is if we include punishment with the rewards.

Some of the PTAs in the US are making inroads against the gay woke nonsense. Some of the teachers are being fired etc.

Vaxtastic
3 years ago

We all dance to the tune of who pays us. In the case of the headmistress it is the state who pays her wages. They also pay the wages of the police. That’s why they’ll drag you out your house and into an antivax camp if the law changes. Some coppers won’t, but the majority will and will work hard to rationalise it.

The schools will ram climate change, trans issues and rainbow gay claptrap down your kids throats if they are told to. They won’t even hesitate.

The only way round this if people want education paid through general taxation rather than privately is a voucher system, and of course abolish the department of education. The alternative, as you have outlined above, is to constantly police government actions. No one has the time for this.

Alter Ego
Alter Ego
3 years ago

Not so long ago, politics were supposed to be verboten in schools.

It was understood that there could be differences of opinion about what was regarded as “political”, particularly with regard to the teaching of history. But contemporary political issues were considered absolutely out of line.

RedhotScot
3 years ago

I’m very pleased there’s someone prepared to stand up to the school climate Nazi’s. My kids are old enough only to have caught the very beginning of this nonsense so I didn’t challenge the school, but I would have.

More parents need to do this. It’s disgusting our children are being propagandised by ignorant fools who know nothing of the subject.

More like you are needed.

rtj1211
rtj1211
3 years ago

I’m not totally convinced that you can prove that the only variable affecting life expectancy was ‘climate change’.

Life expectancy will also have changed due to fewer men working down mines (where they will develop pulmonary diseases causing premature death) or in other dangerously unhealthy work environments; better general diet promoting stronger immune systems; better quality of home insulation reducing numbers experiencing fuel poverty (which has gone back up again of course); less alcohol and tobacco abuse (although class A drug abuse has probably gone up); etc etc.

I don’t deny that warmer winters and (at least in our climate) slightly warmer summers will reduce mortality.

But I think it’s pretty hard to remove all the other variables in your statistical analysis to prove that any change is solely due to climate change.

Hugh
Hugh
3 years ago
Reply to  rtj1211

Terrible conditions in some of those mines. I seem to remember a story that it was common at one time for slate miners to retire in their 30’s and die in their 40’s. And then there were the Nenthead lead miners. The graveyard in the village has very few memorials because so few of the the young men who died there could afford them.

eyesee
eyesee
3 years ago

And we can’t even take any credit, as nothing we’ve been doing has any effect on climate. But hey, good to be alive outside an Ice Age eh? Or even the cold snap of the 1800s, because even though we are better equipped (well, excluding the morons hindering progress and killing people who can’t afford heat) to cope, it would still be pretty unpleasant.

Gregoryno6
3 years ago

I’d like to think those folks are kicking sand in Tim Flannery’s face.

Rose Madder
3 years ago

Chatting to my neighbour yesterday. Patio window needs cleaning. Son came back from Earth Day at school, said don’t bother mummy, we have to leave for another planet soon because of climate change.

iane
iane
3 years ago
Reply to  Rose Madder

Aha, a silver lining there!

David Walker
David Walker
3 years ago

How long before the increasingly evident fact that we won’t be able to drastically reduce our dependence on fossil fuels any time soon allied to the obvious reluctance of increasing numbers of the World’s population to pay at best lip service to the AGW hoax leads to some backtracking on the doom and gloom prognostications from the “climate science” fraternity, likely caused by a reduction in government funding for their dodgy research?
Are the Global Warming alarmists heading towards the same extinction that befell the Ice Age alarmists of the 1960s and 1970s and the Ozone Hole brigade that succeeded them?
Interesting times!

Luis RCoelho
Luis RCoelho
3 years ago

“Climate-related” deaths?
Wow, you also promote this type of fraud? Rubbish? Gibberish?
Read the “European Climate declaration” of 2019, tons of scientists basically saying that there is NO CLIMATE EMERGENCY., saying that actually, CO2 is the gas of life as the entire nature depends on it, that is good for agriculture.
You ought to research WEATHER MODIFICATION as well, as the weather has been manipulated for many decades now. Global warming/climate change is a myth created in the 1960s by the eugenicist think tank Club of Rome.
Research Haarp, research Chemtrails, research “1976 UN Weather Weapons Treaty”.
The wolves manipulate the weather, then 1) say we are all to blame, 2) tax us more and 3) create policies to control all aspects of our lives. None of their ‘solutions’ are never to help nature, on the contrary…
Why are people so ignorant people nowadays?
Why are there so many cowards as well???