The Covid Inquiry Must Not Miss the Small Picture
Allison Pearson has written a terrific piece for the Telegraph about the forthcoming Covid inquiry. She is anxious that Lady Hallett might go easy on some of the senior politicians responsible for Britain’s disastrous response to the pandemic – such as Matt Hancock – and that she won’t examine the impact on ordinary people and their children. Allison points out that you can still suggest things that should be added to the Terms of Reference here (the deadline is April 7th) and suggests six things herself.
- At a No 10 briefing in March 2020, Michael Gove said that the virus did not discriminate: “Everyone is at risk.” And yet it was clear Covid was a highly discriminatory virus; people over 75 were 10,000 times more likely to die from it than those under 15. Who authorised the decision to press ahead with a misinformation campaign telling the public that “all age groups are at risk”, and why?
- On March 22nd, 2020, a paper by SPI-B (the committee giving behavioural science advice to the Government) said: “The perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased among those who are complacent, using hard-hitting, emotional messaging.” Why was it agreed to use fear as a weapon to increase compliance with the coronavirus rules when the public were already showing signs of using their common sense and staying home? What are the likely long-term mental health effects, on children in particular, of telling all age groups they should be scared of Covid?
- Next slide, please! Some of the graphs shown at the No 10 briefings by Professor Sir Chris Whitty and Sir Patrick Vallance picked the lowest historic data point to contrast with the highest projected data point. Expressing data in percentage terms also heightened the sense of alarm. We need a thorough analysis of the veracity of every slide shown to the British people, please, Lady Hallett.
- In the Netherlands, at the peak of the pandemic, the Dutch health system lost only 4% capacity. What percentage capacity did the NHS lose?
- What role did militant teaching unions play in keeping schools shut for so long? Oh, and why was Gavin Williamson, then education secretary, knighted – for services to buggering up British kids’ education?
- And finally, how exactly did throwing a wedding bouquet spread Covid?
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
a face only a mother could love.
Only an adoptive mother.
FIFY.
Matzolam!
Straight from the Devil’sPicture Book!
What’s matzolam? Preparing for Passover?
A new patent for a “pathway” medication perhaps?
There is certainly ‘passing over’ inolved.
No, a face for farting in by an elephant gorged on beans and brussel sprouts.
Either that or a face for a bank of Komodo dragons to belch in.
But wouldn’t you just love to smack him in the gob
Best have teams of elephants, gorged on baked beans and brussel sprouts, take turns at farting in his face.
A face which would be enhanced by the forcible application of a piece of 4 x 2
Very pertinent questions. I would add: why were masks forced on people when we have known for a century that they are ineffective?
Get with the program. It was because new evidence suddenly came to light in Spring 2020. I am not sure what or where this evidence came from as I asked my MP so I could see for myself but I am yet to receive a reply.
Should have wrapped your letter around a bunch of £50 notes.
That’s a point !
Hoe much is a rely fro an MP saying they have pased your letter to someone in Government to respond with the standard ‘nothing to see here’ narrative worth?
Looking at the PPE conracts- £10K?
Helpful aside, £50 is about 7,000 Rubles, or 415 Yuan, at today’s rates.
Wasn’t it the hamsters?
What about Midazolam being forced on people who were incapable of giving consent and are no longer with us?
Just a bit more serious.
It’s more generally called murder.
A term no longer recognised by the Met Police (Hammersmith Branch) and now replaced by “nothing to see here move on “.
At least we know where we stand.
The care homes of England and Wales were littered with the empty vials throughout the Spring-20 death surge, the deadly supplies having been pre-ordered months before. The poison was taken orally. In wave 2, New year 2021, it was administered by lethal injection. The death-rates of the frail-elderly soared everywhere the jabs were taken. Hancock rapidly pulled the Pfizer1 jab and ordered vax-status omitted on death certificates. The media were told to stop reporting spates of post-jab deaths in care homes. All this was done to protect the bonanza jab scam, the wickedest crime in history.
And yet for the Met Police ( Hammersmith Branch) after issuing a Crime Number suddenly, and just after D*ck resigns …”there is nothing to see here, move on”
“Hancock rapidly pulled the Pfizer1 jab and ordered vax-status omitted on death certificates.”
That statement alone – vax status being omitted on death certs – is worthy of being a single strand of the inquiry by itself.
Because at least some people were demanding them and the Kim Jong Johnson regime pandered to them.
In the case of Nicola Ceausescu and Fart Drakeford, they relished the opportunity to invade every aspect of private life.
That’s a good one.
Yes, I thought of it when she threatened Rangers and Celtic for incidents outside their stadia.
A communist dictator that interferes with football….
I think you could stop there and it would be more than enough
Best not to disappear down detailed rabbit holes
Yeah – a “cost benefit analysis” – that’ll show ’em!
Fascism doesn’t do” cost benefit analysis” – well, only in the assessment of how many ‘untermenschen’ standing in a line you can kill with one bullet .
Why was a cost benefit analysis never done?
Why after at two years of virus data over one year of vaccine data, is there still not a proper quantitative risk/benefit calculator available for individual circumstances?
They knew there was no ‘benefit’ to the ‘Gene Therapy Injection’ that came any where near justifying the massive cost …that’s why.
As part of the establishment, of course, Lady Hallett will go easy on some of the senior politicians responsible for Britain’s disastrous response to the pandemic – such as Matt Hancock.
Another cover-up, whitewash just like the Grenfell inquiry.
Yes. And like any other official inquiry too. Even those that criticise more than obviously merely superficially only do it to promote what has already been decided as the “solution”.
Exactly. ALL “official inquiries” are scams. More specifically, if it is genuinely important, no legitimate investigation is allowed or performed. This applies to every subject that cries out for genuine investigations – not just investigations into COVID topics.
The “watchdog” journalists and editors also all know what they CAN investigate and – probably more importantly – what they cannot investigate.
Our Institutions are now thoroughly rotten and corrupt – that’s all we need to know
I see Assange’s appeal to the Supreme Court on his extradition to certain jail horrors in the US has been rejected – as the Johnson Cabal and lackeys bend over to Biden… yet again!
Contrast the “Assange treatment” to the treatment of the Saudi Arabian prince who seems to have literally gotten away with murder of a dissident – ordering a gruesome premeditated murder (including dismemberment of the victim’s body parts to dispose of them).
Yes, I reckon this inquiry will make the hutton one look thorough.
It took over 30 years for the families of the Hillsborough disaster to get anything like “justice” for the 97. The establishment will always close ranks to protect itself and its agents B- tards!
Don’t get me started on this one- I lived in Hillsborough at the time and can tell you that nothing you have read covers everything that happened. Even the local ‘ruffians’ sprayed graffiti saying ‘police not to blame 100%’ because they knew what happened.
Are the government’s behavioural scientists advising on how to rope twits in to contributing their “thoughts” on the questions and “evidence” that should be considered at the official inquiry?
Or are there some types of submissive “thought” in the “intelligentsia” that don’t need to be encouraged because they will “thrive” anyway?
All official inquiries are poop. Those who don’t realise this from the outset have as much criticism in them as a donkey smearing sh*t with his tail.
Anyone who thinks this enquiry will be a search for the truth is delusional
If they were being honest the terms of reference would be
1 Kick the can down the road
2 Exonerate those involved
3 Cover up the crimes
In other words what is now just “standard procedure”!
No real “search for the truth” ever occurs in our New Normal. And it’s not just with COVID issues either.
Well, Allison, I hate to disillusion you, but …………..
At no point, that I can recall, has anyone shown any correlation between the number of ‘cases’ and tests performed. It seems a no brainer to me that the more tests you carry out, the more positives you are likely to find… particularly among the asymptomatic. But, I’d like to know why SAGE apparently believe otherwise?
Asymptomatic is bollox as Dr Mike Yeadon has explained.
Both Whitty and Vallance knew it was bollox too!
Testing people every day they spend in hospital (where they likely caught it) and recording every positive as a case stinks to high heaven.
PCR Tests run at 45c cycles of magnification ( as they were by the NHS Trusts) when the recommended maximum was 25 cycles produce 97% False positives – say it again.
The abuse of the Mullis PCR test reworked by Drosten, is the very heart of the ‘scamdemic’ designed to terrify the population, justify draconian ’emergency’ measures and force the experimental mRNA Gene Therapy injections on the population.
As clear as day!
Because they were dishonest and working to a “narrative” provided?
Oh, please, this just the intermission in the ongoing infection kabuki farce. Go to the lobby and buy some Kia-Ora if you like, and angrily demand to management that some of the actors be dragged off stage, or forced to wear different masks.
But when the lights go out again, the script, direction and plot will remain unchanged.
Whoever is involved in the inquiry must have NO links (Lol) to bigpharma/big tec/TRPTB and must read Kennedy’s book — The Real Anthony Fauci.
The whole criminal conspiracy of world governments, Gates, Schwab etc. is in there for all to see.
This has been planned for years.
We have to fight against compulsory gene therapies/digital ID.
Make no mistake, this is just the beginning of the battle for humanity.
If we lose, our kids are going to be jabbed for life, just to give these bastards control over us forever.
Putting off reading Fauci by RFK Jr. is no longer an option. Deep breath and buy it.
It’s a very painful read. Mind blowing. More damage done by big pharma than (arguably) WWII.
I’m amazed it isn’t onsale as an e-book. You’d get far more reading it that way. My hardback copy took 3 months to arrive from Blackwells. I ordered it in November, got it in February. At least I got it….
It was a couple of quid on kindle
So basically, enrich Jeff Bezos by selling out a few less rich scamsters?? Can’t the world develop an e-book platform free of the billionaires?
You may find a free PDF download. See my comment above.
I downloaded it from Amazon
To stay A*****-free best seems to be to use a site like http://www.bookfinder.com to find the book you want, then order via a platform like Alibris, Ebay, etc. These may be big but are at least not A*****.
You soon get to know which individual booksellers are honest when describing the condition of 2nd. hand books. I’ve just received another book which was described as ‘very good’ but actually looks ‘mint’, so good for them.
I’m basically fed up of reading screens when there’s an alternative and I can read the printed page. Much more relaxing and less eye strain.
I should add that I look for used books because I mainly depend on the state pension.
Yes, I got it from Blackwells. It’s £2.99 from Bezos Kindle where you can read the following: #1 on AMAZON, and a NEW YORK TIMES, WALL STREET JOURNAL, USA TODAY and PUBLISHERS WEEKLY NATIONAL BESTSELLER
Over 1,000,000 copies sold.
It’s not a fringe tin-foil hat publication. It’s got copious footnotes and references and unlike Pfizer data you don’t have to wait 75 years to read it.
The audiobook is worth considering as a better way to digest the litany of horror in the text.
It would be interesting if some journalist found out how many major news organizations even ran a review of this book (which after all has been the No. 1 best-seller for months).
Has there ever been a No. 1 best-seller – which makes so many eye-opening accusations about public officials – that news organizations refused to review?
I wonder how many news organizations will not even run paid advertisements promoting this book.
How many MSM news organizations interviewed Mr. Kennedy about his book?
As well as reading that get copies of “Wall Street and The Bolshevik Revolution”, “Wall Street and The Rise of Hitler”, “Wall Street and FDR” And “National Suicide” all by Antony C Sutton. Also get “The Anglo-American Establishment” by Carroll Quigley. All are available as PDF downloads.
The ‘elites’ have been at it for over a century. They are our real enemies.
Fauci is responsible for more deaths than hitler stalin polpot mugabe at al combined
You missed out Hancock.
Life changing for me – and the b’stard Fauci still refers to AIDS/HIV deniers.
The personification of pure malevolent evil not even Ian Fleming could have dreamt up; described in very shocking detail and I agree with your view about Big Pharma the malign influence of which I have some personal experience. Truly just awful how human beings in positions of trust – a Doctor FFS – can act in such a manner.
Next move is, after finishing it, to go online for the updates.
May I also suggest “Dissolving Illusions – Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History” by Suzanne Humphries and Roman Bystrianyk.
Virtually everything that has been forced upon humanity over the past two years is a re-run of what has been tried before, and with the same catastrophic results. It also explains Leicester’s role in the anti-vaccination movement, going back to the ‘Great Demonstration’ of 1885. I did not know this beforehand and maybe this gives an insight as to why Leicester was targeted so early on for a complete lockdown.
This is an extraordinarily important book and a total exposure of the shocking history of forced vaccinations – juts what Gates wants to take us back to for his climate and population control agenda!
We need to wake up very soon!
We are awake David – fully – it is other people who need waking up. Other people – the vast majority are in danger of sleepwalking into a nightmarish future that I have described above – what Davos et al intends for us – and all because they cannot believe that their governments would sell them down the river for it or that it is even technologically possible.
Leiecster is one of very few cities where the ethnic population is the minority; given the large proportion of people from the Asian sub continent who live in Victorian/Edwardian houses cheek by jowl, and the lack of take up of the “vaccines” initially, Lockdown Leicester was absolutely nothing to do with 1885.
More to do with the prevalence of TB in some of the inner city areas I reckon – and which is an open secret, and has been to my certain knowledge since the 1970’s if not earlier.
I think you may mean that Leicester has an ethnic Majority. It is certainly true that Leicester itself rejected the smallpox and measles vaccines. I am from an old Leicester family and my Grandfather,at the age of twenty was hospitalised with smallpox in the Leicester Royal Infirmary.He was not expected to survive. He did survive however sans vaccine, and without a mark on his body and left for New Zealand shortly afterwards. He returned to Leicester in 1908 having aquired a fiance along the way. As I recollect he considered the best quality food to be necessary for health, never went to a doctor, took snuff and carried nutmegs in his pocket to ward off rheumatism.
correct, apologies!
Johnson os signing up to ye handing over of UK Health Policy to the WHO Tedros and Bill Gates – no-one seems to be interested.
Bill Gates want population control – suggested 15% reduction- by ‘vaccination’ – he has said so on record.
What You Need to Know About the Transhumanist Agenda (mercola.com) If you only read one article today then read the one at the link above. THIS [below] is where we are headed – all courtesy of the scam that was covid19 According to Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum (WEF), the goal of The Fourth Industrial Revolution is to change what it means to be human by merging man and machine Humans are now “hackable,” in that technology now exists by which a company or government can know you better than you know yourself, and that can be very dangerous if misused Professor Yuval Noah Harari predicts that algorithms will increasingly be used to make decisions that have historically been made by humans, either yourself or someone else, including whether or not you’ll be hired for a particular job, whether you’ll be granted a loan, what scholastic curriculum you will follow and even who you will marry Harari warns that if we allow the establishment of a digital dictatorship, where the system, be it a corporation or a government, knows the most intimate details about each and every person, it will be impossible to dismantle… Read more »
Until the next Carrington Event – which is probably overdue!
“including whether or not you’ll be hired for a particular job”
That is already happening in this country; software that analyses facial movements at many thousands of takes per second, compared to allegedly “successful” employees is already in use especially in the Financial sector in London. Open to control by those who control the servers for certain.
As a person of my acquaintance was told after an interview ( but not by the interviewer or business) – ethnically anglo Saxon Caucasian – “you have no chance, wrong gender, wrong ethnicity – the software has stuffed you”
Regrettably if the kids are jabbed with this unnecessary gloop they will have shortened and ailing lives
Dancing round the rim of the volcano on roller skates compared to the second story In Other News below:
This stuff is only going to get louder.
Where is June Raine of the GAVI / Gates / Wellcome sub-branch called MHRA?
Garden leave?
Booster anyone? More Pfizer shares?
Dr Ryan Cole isn’t just any old pathologist.
I wonder what our venerable Royal College of Pathologists is doing?
And he has been saying this for over 12 months now.
Correct on both counts.
Head down fingers in ears June! … it will all pass by with the censored Globalist Media on side, busy diverting the sheep’s attention!
“Look over there ! Gosh! Hitler is back!”
Let’s not forget Tony Blair’s advice to Rebekah Brooks, to set up a Hutton-style inquiry which would “clear” her, so long as she went through the motions of accepting “shortcomings” as part of the report. And the report should be released at an opportune moment which defuses the contents of the report.
If sooner, harder and longer is the outcome then we are f**ked.
I suspect that the last three words of your comment are all that is needed.
Registered my response last week. 1. how did the models be so wrong and why were they continually wrong when other more pertinent observations could have been a better guide. Responsibilities and accountabilities 2. Legal controls without true representation of the people – past, present and future. 3. Lockdowns – why did the Prime minister state about letting rip and herd immunity from the get-go change to lockdowns – contrary to established protocols? 4. True efficacy and safety of the chosen treatments – which are proving to have a high injury rate that for it not being a pandemic would not have been granted even experimental status? 5. When did SAGE/Govt know that the vaccines did not stop transmission of Covid 6. When did SAGE/Govt/NHS know that vaccines did not stop or reduce the severity of Covid? 7. Why alternate treatments were not also included in the experimental category i.e. Ivermectin, Zinc, Hydrochloroquinine (HCQ) – which have now been to be proven in India, Japan, Ecuador and Honduras to be highly safe and effective. 8. Follow the money – who benefited? 9. Why were basic freedoms – freedom to move, associate and speak curtailed and irrespective of any pandemic, why… Read more »
regarding no 10 on your list, as the government so often rammed
stateddown out throats that it was “following the science”, the inquiry should require the government to produce ‘the science’ which supported the question you posit at no 10.What scientific studies justified the introduction of vaxx passports on the grounds that they would curtail transmission, and what conflicts of interest were involved in that.
In days of yore I would have been minded to send my own list to the inquiry of issues I wanted discussed. I commend you for doing so and I hope your points get taken on board.
However, speaking personally, I am now so incredibly fatigued with challenging stuff, only to find out that it was nothing more than window dressing and they were never genuinely interested in acting on the views of those responding to consultations, that I simply cannot be bothered any more. That makes me somewhat ashamed of myself but I just have so much on my plate that whatever I spend my efforts on has to be made to count for something as opposed to turn out to be a waste of time.
Important to note that while the inquiry is in its infancy the WHO is trying to make a take-over bid to control of world health with a coercive pandemic treaty which Javid is expected to sign up to in May. This will thoroughly usurp both national and personal autonomy if it happens but also preempt the results of the inquiry. So, watch the ball!
why is GB News not covering this issue???
The inquiry will say everything was fabulous, we all know that
The trouble is that this Inquiry will make no difference whatsoever.
I don’t have much faith in the inquiry getting close to the truth about the covid response.
Three’s just too much at risk for the ruling parties.
What’s amazing is how we’re still getting surprisingly little information about certain things.
For example (as I had a professional interest in it) — vitamin D. At the start of this vitamin D was known to be an immuno-modulator, but any attempts to push it as a potential mitigation were countered. This didn’t make sense as it was a zero-cost option, both in terms of money (essentially free) and health (it is an essential hormone and the problem is generally deficiency not excess). But the amazing part about this is that there’s still little information about it — eg, the Coronavit trial is now about 12 months since the initial completion date, yet we don’t even have any hint of preliminary data.
I expect the inquiry will gloss over vitamin D, saying that ‘we didn’t know’, ‘erred on the side of safety’ etc etc, when from a medical science point of view it is unfathomable why it wasn’t extensively used (as part of a national scale programme) right from the start.
I believe the lack of information is deliberate and this is hardly surprising
I am of the same opinion.
NHS has very poor track record on vitamin D status and testing and treating for deficiency, and even the advice they do give is so woeful – they say that no more than 400iu per day is “safe” and MSM nods along sagely and trots out the same when in order to treat long standing deficiencies you can safely take thousands of iu per day.
There are probably people up and down the UK totally wasting their money taking vitamin D supps [likely D2 not the active D3] and religiously adhering to the 400iu guidance which won’t even touch the sides of a long standing deficiency.
Most people I know are now taking 1,000 IU/day.
I keep telling them that I take 3,000 IU/day … and some people need more, although it’s wise to get a few tests after you start, because some people get a good super-high level from a dose of only 1,000 a day.
I am taking 2000 iu per day [along with vitamin K2 and magnesium and trying to get calcium from diet] but will drop down to 1000 iu when the summer months come around – I test every so often but am due one soon.
Until a year or so ago, they used to recommend only 200 a day, but it was (quietly) doubled. Other countries recommend 800. At this time of year, I now use at least 1250 IU per day – 5 µg from a traditional supermarket “everyday health” mixture, and their 25 µg vitamin D only one – marketed as “bone health”, plus whatever is in some things I eat.
I suspect that many in the medical trade just don’t know how important vitamin D levels are to maintain the functions of our immune system, and say nothing about it. They are probably taught about the history of it’s discovery, rickets and so on, and that’s it.
Available guidance about how much exposure to ultra violet B is needed to do the job automatically (i.e. in our own skin) is vague, and potentially contradictory, when they are more worried about sun burn etc, but a lot depends on individual lifestyle.
In our latitudes I believe you’d need to wear shorts and have a bare torso all summer long and pray for every day to be sunny.
and what about the lack of detail about only taking it with Vit K?…
It was and has for many years used in our house. I was actually warned against it without the slightest attempt to justify it- just the usual ‘you can’t be too careful’ type stuff.
Bang on; and the most awkward question to Whitty has to be “why did you not – ever – mention ensuring people took adequate levels of vitamins and minerals KNOWN to enhance your immune system?”
For me that is the question to be asked as he “climbs the scaffold”, along with a very long line of co-conspirators.
Conclusion is already written. We ‘beat’ the virus with our Mrna wonder drugs and mask wearing by our brave population.
More gongs all round and more coercion built into the law to force stab the whole population next time around.
Talking of next time around, China has another massive lockdown. Has somebody ‘accidentally’ dropped a different test tube whilst shopping for their groceries at the local wet market?
Here’s a few questions I doubt any MP would wish to be asked: What role has Mr William Gates III had on UK Government health policy (and other areas of policy) since January 2020? What due diligence was done on the advice Mr Gates proffered to the UK Government and what was the outcome of that due diligence? Were Civil Service Minutes taken during meetings (both F2F and Zoom) between Mr Gates and senior members of the government/hierarchy? Were any threats made to UK Government officials by Mr Gates either directly or via third parties? Given Mr Gates’ huge financial interests across a wide range of sectors impacted by the Covid19 debacle, did the UK Government consider him to be an advisor sufficiently impartial to be worthy of framing Government policy?? Given the amount spent by the UK Government on vaccines, and given Mr Gates’ investments in a variety of biopharma companies, what is the estimated net transfer of UK taxpayer funds to Mr Gates through increases in stock valuations, dividends paid by his investee companies? Does the Enquiry consider the taxpayer funding of one of the world’s richest men to be a priority higher than best practice in medical… Read more »
I have the answers already:
“It is deemed not to be in the public interest to pursue any of these questions. However the UK government is eternally grateful to Mr Gates for his timely intervention in the delivery of safe and effective vaccines, which played a decisive role in saving us all from being wiped out by this uniquely dangerous virus. When everyone’s life is at stake, we are sure you will agree that any financial cost is good value for money.”
Satisfied?
The Gates Foundation (and other “charities”) have also bestowed millions in grants to journalism organizations or foundations that support journalism. So the “watchdog” press has been bought off – either by financial donations and/or via tax payer expenditures via the purchase of advertising promoting the vaccines and lockdown policies. Also, the press never discloses that it has received all of this money to support one side of this alleged debate. The press also won’t run any stories or advertisements from groups or experts that challenge the narrative – so they are also censoring dissenting views. The notion of “fair and balanced” press coverage is a sad joke.
They certainly are censoring. I’ve been banned from commenting on the Daily Telegraph website ever since I posted links to the Planet Lockdown interviews with Dr Mike Yeadon and Dr Wolfgang Wodarg at the beginning of the year. It can only have been that because I neither abused anyone nor used foul language nor wrote anything else that could be deemed ‘unacceptable’. It seems truth-seeking is ‘far right’ and the DT is anti-free speech.
After reading, not yet completed, RFK Jnr’s epic tome, straight after Dr MK’s triptych, the most obvious conclusion is to ask how much could have been achieved by Big Pharma etc if they had researched cancer treatments or genuine CVD treatments ….instead of the mirage of “vaccines’ for pure greed and profit.
“It was never about health” How true.
A great list – send it to Baroness Hallet!!
I’m still waiting for her personal e-mail address at the Lords. I asked them for it on Monday.
(Almost) all MPs have one. It’s the 21st.C!
share it here if you get it, however I would imagine they would want inquiry requests all directed through a central contact point – hence the advice above to go via the link in the article
Excellent questions.
I would also add:
points 3 and 4 are excellent – particularly point 3
inappropriate use of ventilators in hospitals should also be looked at as many patients were put on them and subsequently died because their lungs couldn’t cope with the amount of oxygen being directed at them.
And especially where remdesivir was prescribed in tandem, according to Dr Ardis.
Now, who mandated remdesivir?
A British government public enquiry? Give me a break! Look at the member’s of the public enquiry panel, establishment figures all. It’s even got the rancid creature who organised the vax rollout in UK schools, foxes guarding the henhouse…
Watch UK Column for a critique on what will be yet another UK establishment exercise in obfuscation and filthy lies!
try this for an impact example of societal lunacy courtesy of fundamentalist interpretation of the ministry of nudge: my brothers Sunday football league banned not only heading of the ball and throw ins but an important risk reduction was not to change sides at half time!
Who authorised the decision to press ahead with a misinformation campaign telling the public that “all age groups are at risk”, and why? Exactly – as someone who suspected I had covid before the first lockdowns were introduced none of what the government was saying made any sense to me – it all sounded … well barmy to be honest – nothing added up. So I did my own research rather than listen to a government that was making it all sound like we were at war with a virus that was something akin to the bubonic plague – it was all end of the world stuff – so after some lengthy research I was amazed to discover that taking into account my age and health status that I was at an extremely low risk of dying from covid19 – in fact I was so low a risk that the chances of something falling on my head and killing me whilst out walking were higher than me dying from covid19 – at those odds I decided I would have been much wiser wearing a hard hat than wearing a mask when venturing outside. So glad I didn’t have the jab… Read more »
My sense about the Covid exercise is that it is so egregious and desperate that:
(a) it must have been driven by a perceived crisis as opposed to a vanity project designed to bring about the technocratic control grid many sceptics obsess about; and
(b) those pushing it can’t have thought there would be a functioning society at the end of it within which they could be investigated, arrested and served justice.
In summary, I still think it’s a panic move.
Sorry CG, but no way was the government reaction to C1984 a panic move. Bozo and Co were under orders from Globocap from the start and so knew full well what their mission was. The very fact that most other national governments were in Lockstep confirms they were working to Agenda 2030 and still are.
As the evidence is being revealed it is becoming crystal clear that the overall aim was and is depopulation; both Kate and Victoria posted excellent pieces with article links on here last night confirming this.
The “vaccines” have been brewed to a recipe with next generation infertility built in which explains the push to inject even babies. Fauci owns one of the patents. “Ingredients” are being manually added to the “vaccines.”
The suggestion that all national governments panicked is a fallacy they may now seek to promote but it has no basis in reality. Just like NPI’s the intended outcome is the exact opposite of the one being pushed.
We are facing Democide and no question. For any that might survive the future is technocratic slavery.
I’m certainly not saying they were panicking about covid – I think there’s a financial crisis/collpase happening in the background which forced their hand, and I think CBDCs is the end game, rather than depopulation.
I wish I could agree, but it is worth taking a long hard look at Stanley Johnson’s work, particularly his books on depopulation. It is then worth working out at what age Boris was when father Stanley was writing his books, saying that the optimum population of the UK was 5-10M.
After that it is worth exploring whether Boris has ever contradicted his father on this, for not all fathers and sons agree. Unfortunately he also speaks of overpopulation being a big, big problem.
Of course no one is going to be evidently nasty and tell those down for death as to why, how, and who. But you can be sure it is not their own. Nor would being predominantly native to the UK for centuries be the issue, since there will be no ethnic cleansing of those with Turkish or Swedish backgrounds!! It is the oiks, the NLU people, the gullible, the handicapped, the non-elite elderly and old, the ‘useless eaters’. It sounds insane, it is insane, and I wish to God it were not so.
Always “follow the money.” Where does the money really come from these days? It comes from digital printing presses. The money is created out of thin air. Once fully implemented/enacted, the digital currency “reform” will probably result in a “cashless society.” This will make it much easier for the State to confiscate “your” money – which is really their money. This will also create a digital “carrot and stick” system to keep the masses participating in only approved economic activities and transactions. Rarely mentioned in all of this discussion about the big picture is the important role that gold and silver (“History’s money”) play in monetary matters and fiscal markets. Basically, sentiment for gold and silver – which are kind of kryptonite to fiat currencies – must be kept atrocious… less people in mass begin to abandon our current “Monopoly money.” Myself (and other conspiracy kooks) think that gold and silver have been intentionally maligned and the “markets” for precious metals suppressed …. to protect the fiat printing presses. Again, “follow the money.” As long as gold and silver are NOT a threat to digital or fiat currencies – and if the State can acquire even more access to citizens’… Read more »
The key is debt and how long the “Herd” continues to prop up the weight of debt. It will be fine until that herd instinct is broken – then the corollary to the supportive instinct, which will evaporate, will render the burden of debt too heavy. Then you will get the questions such as “why did we not see that X was unsustainable before?” What was “accepted ” becomes the weakest link.
If the Chinese wanted to stuff the US , they could dump $ debt on the market and cause a massive crash; but that would stuff their own economy which supplies billions of goods to the US, goods which would have no market post crash.
Mexican stand off.
I agree with the post HP and the depop agenda but see my post above – I think it is both depop and transhumanism.
I think CG is wrong on a) but very right on b)
I actually think that the absence of a functioning society, at least one which the average man would want to live in, as opposed to the elite, is what this is all about at the end of it
Whilst I wouldn’t for a minute put depopulation beneath the ruling class, the thing I can’t get past or round is how this could be implemented through the sheer number of workers/scientists involved in developing the vaccines. As far as I can see Bill Gates has created the vaccine economy, and by throwing obscene amounts of money at it, I am sure he has effectively created a kind of cult of vaccines where the most evangelical scientists are promoted and rewarded and critics are removed from the equation. So this easily explains the demented push amongst this part of the scientific community to vaccinate the world, no matter how nonsensical this is. It also explains how the abundant evidence of vaccine harm is minimised or ignored. Having bought the media also helps of course. What it doesn’t explain is how, realistically, a proportion of these scientists could be tasked with effective ways to exterminate or sterilise vast numbers of people. I’m not saying that it’s impossible but it seems implausible. That’s why, to me, the most rational explanation is that the S1 spike protein and the vaccine were developed in tandem and designed to be a means of control. This… Read more »
Your brain is clearly better than mine CG – it is going to take me several reads of your post before I could offer an even half sensible reply! You said “What it doesn’t explain is how, realistically, a proportion of these scientists could be tasked with effective ways to exterminate or sterilise vast numbers of people. I’m not saying that it’s impossible but it seems implausible.“ But is there not evidence already out there quite some time ago (Ryan Cole?) saying that the lipid nano particles and the spike protein have been found in ovarian tissue and this is why there is a concern about female fertility and the jabs being forced on young girls who will effectively be sterilised by them – hence one part of the depopulation job done by preventing more reproduction. And then another part of the depopulation agenda is furthered by the jabbing adverse events and illnesses – we have all seen the Pfizer pages and pages of the side effects they knew about before this product was approved even for EUA – there is no way of knowing the sheer quantity of people who will be done for by virtue of the jabs,… Read more »
I think they fantasise about a world in which they wield great power (over who?) and are served and admired (again by whom?). Just as Milton describes Adam eating the apple and it turns into ashes in the mouth, so for them there are massive factors that they have overlooked and if they ‘succeed’ they will end up massively miserable.
They have not understood, as Robert Zubrin shows clearly in the early chapters of his book, “Merchants of Despair” that human happiness and prosperity has an ingenuity and creativity factor that has an incremental dependence upon quite a large population. Robot economies won’t work. The machine obsessed autistic idiots lacking EQ don’t get it.
I think you are right Liberty – too many people, with too much damage done to their psyches, with too much money, and too many powerful connections (I could go on but I think you can see who I am describing!) who don’t live real lives or in the real world have got together and hatched a plan which they think is just wonderful – I actually think that they have done it in such a multifaceted way that they do seem to have covered all the bases and I think that it has been in train for perhaps decades, but it has speeded up dramatically over the last 2 years. I agree with you that “human happiness and prosperity has an ingenuity and creativity factor that has an incremental dependence upon quite a large population. Robot economies won’t work. The machine obsessed autistic idiots lacking EQ don’t get it.” The creativity and ingenuity factor is a big thing for me – technology I can quite happily take or leave but the bulk of the population is obsessed with it – I saw a billboard in my area yesterday advertising some broadband that would allow you to connect 100 devices… Read more »
Cracking post.
Thank you.
Firstly my brain is most certainly not better than yours!! There’s probably a certain amount of denial going on on my part. I find it really hard to comprehend the premeditated murder of millions of people but then, I’m not a member of the ruling class who believes that most people are useless eaters and it’s my right and duty to exterminate or sterilise them if i no longer have any need for their productivity!
It’s very hard for me to explain how a product so clearly harmful could be given to so many people under a web of lies and deception without the intention being to harm them. I’m kind of bending over backwards to find an answer.
But if harm/depopulation/sterilisation really was the intention, how many people would need to have known this and how did it get past the ones who didn’t? That’s what’s so baffling to me. The only way I can make sense of it is if there’s a sense amongst the ruling elite that this was a better alternative than societal breakdown, which they may have seen coming because the economy is dead. Will we ever know??!
I think our common problem is that we probably adhere to values and beliefs which all of the people who are involved in this and who have designed it simply do not share, so that means 2 things – a) they have absolutely zero compunction about what they are doing – they don’t see it as wrong and I would imagine they feel zero guilt about any of it, they probably don’t even know what it means to feel guilty about anything and they have probably convinced themselves that they are doing mankind a service and b) we cannot begin to comprehend the ways in which their minds work or how someone could be so deceitful and so evil – there just isn’t any other word for it – and it is mind bending to even begin to try. Hard though it is to accept I have come to the conclusion now that this isn’t some kind of cock-up or mistake (why would you need the likes of SPI-B and their hideous lying nudging it it was a mistake and if you look at all the posts above about the inquiry that was a LOT of mistakes they were making).… Read more »
Can’t disagree with any of that. I guess I’ve just defeated my own argument and not for the first time! I imagine that the royals for instance have deeply entrenched values and principles that would appall most people and that they see themselves as custodians of their subjects and empowered to dominate, control, deceive and destroy anyone not of their bloodline. I’m sure they don’t regard themselves as evil, rather duty bound to make tough decisions for what they believe to be the greater good (as long as it’s one where they’re in charge) and I suppose it’s not too much of a stretch to imagine the Davos crowd granting themselves the same power. I also know that compartmentalisation is a wickedly powerful means of carrying out horrors without anyone whistle blowing.
But, if I had to put money on it, I’d still lean towards the vaccine programme being driven by the need to get everyone on to a digital privilege system (and identify those who won’t comply).
Of course for this purpose they could have just used a placebo.
Oh no I’m defeating my own argument again.
Confused of West Yorkshire
There aren’t lamp-posts high enough for those b*st*rds.
Our so-called ‘elites’ are our real enemy. They have been at it for over a century. Wall Street created the Bolshevik revolution, built the USSR and financed the Nazis. They were still financing certain German industries in WW2 while the RAF and USAAF bombed cities but carefully didn’t target certain factories. Read the works of Antony Sutton. It is the Western so-called ‘elites’ who are our real enemies. Not Putin, nor Xi.
What complete and utter ill informed bollox. For the first 4 years of the war the RAF could not bomb a target within a radius of many miles – how on this earth could they and the USAAF carefully ignore “certain factories”? It took a genius – Sir Barnes Wallis – and the sacrifice of 55,000 aircrew to deplete the NAZI war machine to such an extent it ran out of planes, tanks fuel etc as well as the air superiority over Nazi Germany from 1944 onwards. In the face of massive opposition from “officials’ , Barnes Wallis developed Upkeep that had to be delivered at a strict speed, 60 feet above a lake; a lot of extremely brave and highly skilled aircrew died during Operation Chastise. What many people ignore is what happened AFTER Chastise. Wallis went on to develop Tallboy and Grand Slam , tail fin offset weapons that broke the speed of sound as they speared into the ground using the “camouflet” effect to devastating purpose. Very few RAF squadrons were equipped with men and machines capable of doing this. Those that were destroyed the Saumur railway tunnel, the Bielefeld and Antheor viaducts, the V weapons sites… Read more »
My contribution: On the 18th of December, 2021, Fraser Nelson of The Spectator published an exchange he had with Graham Medley, the chair of the Sage modelling committee. In this exchange, Medley states that the only scenarios that were ever modelled were the ones where decision makers would need to make a decision, which are the most serious scenarios, using the most extreme assumptions. More moderate and likely scenarios which did not indicate the need for social measures such as lockdowns, were ignored. This means that all the models both us, the public, and the decision makers were shown were those that required restrictions to be put in place. As such, the following questions must be answered: Who told SAGE that they should only model the most extreme scenarios and ignore the more likely, moderate scenarios that did not lead to restrictions? Were decision makers ever aware that the data they were given was designed with the specific goal in mind to get them to enact more restrictions? Were the models and outcomes produced by SAGE ever reviewed by a third party to ensure that they are built on sound assumptions? Why did the government surround itself with “yes men”… Read more »
It was a set up from day one and Johnson’s “following the (corrupted) science ” ( into the pit).
Much like Climate Change, where the only thing the modellers were asked to do was indicate how bad it could* be…
Excellent points – go to the link in Alison Pearson’s article and put them to the terms of reference
Why was so little outdoor exerrcise allowed when it was immediately clear that being indoors was far more likely to spread the virus.
Who came up with insanities like you could walk on a golf course, but to actually swing and hit a ball would be an arrestable offence?
Joykillers obviously.
To me it points to a conditioning exercise, and also gave governments an accurate picture of how compliant their populations were. If there’s a financial collapse on the horizon and you know you’re going to have millions of angry/hungry people to control, this knowledge is essential. If this was the case, then the rules would be deliberately incoherent and arbitrary, which they most certainly were.
A tough question for SAGE and NERVTAG and Ferguson and PHE and Hancock and Raine ….the list is very long.
I’d like to see an alternative, independent enquiry referring to the material from the likes of Sunetra Gupta, Carl Hennagon etc – at least a high profile summary and sharp list of questions, back by as many prominent sceptics as possible.
That way, when the official enquiry whitewashes over our points, which it surely has been designed to do, it will be impossible to claim our views were properly considered.
The fcat is that the enquiry will be a total whitewash – we all know that.
Either that, or something else will occur, giving them an excuse to suspend it indefinitely – like the Grenfell tower one (which is still suspended, I think).
Steve Kirsch has been trying to make happen the one event(s) that might change the narrative – a REAL debate between experts and authorities skeptical of the myriad components of the COVID narrative and those who defend all of the mitigation policies and mandates.
The brilliance of Kirsch’s campaign is that he knows no “authority” is willing to DEFEND these policies in a genuine public debate. This is such a giant “tell.”
THE litmus test for me.
Of course it’s going to exonerate them and you are idiots if you expect otherwise.
~ Why did Johnson discard the sensible pre-existing UK focused protection pandemic plan, and proceed to lock down our country, in response to Macron’s telephone threat to close French borders in March 2020?
Because he’s a populist who either does what he thinks will be popular or what he’ll be unpopular for not doing.
It’s an easy out for Johnson and the Government.
We listened to the experts, they were wrong. Everyone wanted us to follow the science, it was wrong. We opened up, it wasn’t a disaster. The experts warned it would be, they were wrong.
In which case, the experts should be pilloried and removed from positions of influence (and not get knighthoods)
Johnson listened to “selected” experts who had learned the “appropriate” WEF – Gates- Fauci – Big Pharma narrative – can we at last be honest about that ?
He made sure the alternative experts ( those not aligned to Big Pharma and Gates funded interests) were ignored, smeared and banned by his friends in the Media and Corporate Social Media.