Systemic Adverse Events in 23% of the Vaccinated, 16% of the Vaccine Ends Up in the Liver – Revelations From the Pfizer Trial Documents
Steve Kirsch and Kyle Beattie have been going through the documents from the Pfizer Covid vaccine trial that the company has been compelled to release (150 so far with many more to come). While they warn that their findings are preliminary and need double-checking, here are some of the key points from their analysis so far.
1. Despite recent claims that the vaccines were only ever intended to reduce serious illness, it’s clear in the documents (see excerpts below) that Pfizer’s submission to the FDA was for a vaccine that would provide: “Active immunisation to prevent COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 in individuals 16 years of age and older.” This purpose of the drug is stated repeatedly. That’s what it’s supposed to do, what it was authorised for. This means it has failed on its own terms, and it is unclear why this should not invalidate the authorisation in the eyes of the approving body.
2. A high number of adverse events were observed, and it was clear that many were reactions to the vaccine as they were much higher in the vaccine arm and increased with each dose.
The dose relationship was observed particularly in the animal trials. In the documents, Pfizer states:
Local reactions were observed in male and female animals dosed IM with BNT162b2 (V8). The incidence and severity of the reactions were higher after the second or third injections compared with the first injection. The majority of animals had very slight edema or rarely slight erythema after the first dose. After the second or third dose, the severity of edema and erythema increased up to moderate or rarely, severe grades.
The animal trials also showed serious adverse reactions of muscle necrosis and increased spleen size and weight.
BNT162b2 (V8)-related higher absolute and relative (to body) spleen weights (up to 1.62 times controls) were evident and correlated with the macroscopic observation of increased spleen size… Injection site inflammation was associated with moderate edema, mild myofiber degeneration, occasional muscle necrosis, and mild fibrosis.
The documents show that vaccine recipients were much more likely to suffer severe adverse events than placebo recipients – anywhere from twice to 25 or more times as likely to have severe systemic events compared with the placebo group.
Systemic events were more than twice as likely in the vaccine arm, with almost a quarter of the cohort suffering them. Steve writes:
Within seven days after each dose, twice as many people (23%) in the vaccinated group suffered systemic events compared with the placebo group (11.3%), while severe fever was noted in the vaccinated group 14 times as much as the placebo group.
3. It’s very clear in the documents that the vaccine does not stay at the injection site but travels extensively throughout the body.
The data from the animal trials show that with one dose over a 48 hour period the vaccine quantity decreases from the injection site and increases substantially in the ovaries, liver, and spleen in particular, but also in adrenal glands, bladder, bone, bone marrow, eyes, large intestine, lymph nodes, pancreas, salivary glands, skin, small intestine, testes, thymus, thyroid, and the uterus.
Specifically, 0.09% of the injection ends up in the ovaries, 1.03% of the injection ends up in the spleen, and around 16.2% of the injection ends up in the liver after 48 hours. The table below shows some of the data. This confirms what was known from Japanese data.
4. The data also show that the efficacy of the vaccine wanes very quickly over time, by as much as 50% in a month after the second dose, judging by S1-binding and RBD-binding IgG antibody levels.
5. In the documents, Pfizer defended the side-effect reporting system VAERS as a “robust” system that is “designed to detect safety concerns with vaccines” when it wanted to get out of monitoring side-effects itself (see below). Yet subsequently the extraordinary number of VAERS reports have largely been treated as incidental and unrelated to the vaccines, despite the trial data giving every reason to expect high numbers of adverse reactions.
Read Steve’s post in full here.
Stop Press: Dr. John Campbell has switched to recommending against vaccination following the revelations in these documents. Watch the video here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
When the censoring of science and common sense finally cracks here, the repercussions are going to be enormous. Potentially, so bad for so many people, that you could imagine the case for not releasing the truth!
It’s going to be hard to get a hotel in Nuremberg at this rate.
You’ll always be able to get a room in Hilbert’s Hotel.
What nation is going to call for any kind of Nuremberg trials?
As Steve Kirsch has told us, there’s not one college in America that will even host a debate on COVID policies.
Are they the same paragons of US education – cannot bring myself to type “advanced” – that have cancelled the likes of Duesberg for decades relating to any discussion or research funding to look further into HIV/AIDS/AZT etc etc ? I think they may have “form”.
Censorship?
At present they’re just totally ignoring it.
The sleight of hand from – ‘It will stop you getting covid” to “It reduces severity of covid” was highly telling.
In the future, the phrase will be, “es it might kill you or do you harm, but you have a duty to run the risk of taking one for society”.
That’s where we’re headed. The Human Rights Bill kills off individual rights, and imposes the concept of ‘greater good’.
It’s communism – a Conservative government is introducing communism.
Don’t give up too soon. Some walls are beginning to crack: https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/1577745/Pfizer-vaccine-side-effects-adverse-effects
Fake Cracks.
No mention of the deaths though, I wonder why?
As Sir Desmond Swayne put it, taking one for the team, Just like the Queen, he is a let down.
Five live this morning there was an epidemiologist claiming natural immunity isn’t as effective as the vaccine. At least dick Turpin wore a mask.
They are just liars aren’t they?
What evidence is there of a Conservative Government t? I see none whatever.
Yep. Spot on.
https://m.theepochtimes.com/episode-1-war-on-the-human-spirit-the-dark-origins-of-communism_3947877.html
Pfizer; the company subjected to the largest criminal fine ever. Chance to break its own record?
Moderna: originally styled ‘ModeRNA’.
Never going to happen. Who will demand repercussions? The media? When they played a leading role in propaganda and disinformation? The politicians? When they exploited and whipped up fear to gain buy-in for their authoritarian power grab? Trade unions, NGO? nope, all bought and paid for, all on the jab train.
No, the people who did this will escape justice entirely, unless we physically do it ourselves.
I’m not so sure. Never underestimate the ability of politicians to do a 180 degree turn on a sixpence, when it suits them. Remember the politicians and indeed bureaucrats who made the decisions in 2020 won’t be in power for ever, and one day someone will come along and see a political open goal – the ability to blame all the woes of the moment on politicians of the past. I’m not saying its likely, but it is possible. Politicians of the future will be quite happy to throw their forebears under the bus if it saves their skins.
Tony Blair comes to mind with his WMDs
Repercussions? You’re having a giraffe, right? The establishment will close ranks and there will be a brief fudge before it’s forgotten. Like every other costly and illegal government cockup ever.
A bit like Partygate, remember Boris answering a police accusation
Or the invasion of Iraq, instigated by an as yet un-prosecuted war criminal.
Before he died, the famed prosecutor and author Vincent Bugliosi (sp?) was pushing as hard as he could for a prosecution of George W. Bush (and all his Neo-con advisers) to be tried for crimes against humanity.
At the time, my eyes had not been fully opened to the real nature of the world and I probably thought, “chill out, Vince.” Now, however, I see that he was exactly right.
His book on the subject is a riveting, recommended read.
Not this time. This is an international scale of duplicity and deception, and will not go away. The other stuff you mention is insignificant in comparison. All it needs is MSM to switch sides, which they will as presiding governments are overturned and it will turn into a huge roar for accountability. I shall watch what happens in Austria where they have suspended only, not recanted, on legal enforcement. A sizeable proportion has steadfastly refused vaccination, and when the rest truly learn how they have been deceived it will start an avalanche. I would not like to be in avalanche or Whitty shoes, and Van Tam saw that!
This is worth a laugh…
https://babylonbee.com/news/dr-fauci-gets-in-intense-debate-with-dr-fauci-from-a-few-months-ago/
The war in Ukraine is a made to measure distraction to ensure that the release of the truth goes unnoticed and when ‘normal services are resumed’, the general public with the attention span of a gnat will be preoccupied with some new terror or mundanity.
Also, a lot of people don’t want to admit they were duped, it embarrasses them… as it should.
All the defenders of all the false narratives and bogus science know that they “must all hang together.” If they don’t, they know that they could all “hang together.”
So nothing is going to happen to them. They know this because they know that the “watchdog” press is just as complicit as they are … so they are not going to expose their “crimes against humanity.”
There is actually “safety in numbers” when all the key parties were equally wrong.
Faster! faster! This headlong rush for new vaccines
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/faster-faster-this-headlong-rush-for-new-vaccines/
Tom Penn
Next events – come and join us
Thursday 10th March 5pm to 6pm
Yellow Boards
A329 London Rd,
Near Running Horse/Lily Hill Park
Bracknell RG12 2UJ
Stand in the Park Sundays from 10am – make friends & keep sane
Wokingham Howard Palmer Gardens Cockpit Path car park Sturges Rd RG40 2HD
Telegram http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell
–
Mummy, what’s a safety trial?
it’s something to ignore dear, in the search for money.
We have all read the facts. The data was fudged, the tests were useless, the statistics artificially inflated, and many deaths were intentionally caused through institutionalized medical negligence. Hospitals received funding bonuses as payoffs.
None of that had anything to do with bad data, or pessimistic models. They did it all on purpose, all of it.
Every life lost, every business destroyed, every penny wasted, every child traumatised. Every moment of anxiety and fear – every single one – entirely intentional.
They ruined lives and countries and the global economy as a deliberate policy on the back of a vast web of lies, and last act of the deception will be to claim it was a “mistake”.
https://off-guardian.org/2022/03/07/dont-believe-the-medias-fake-post-mortem-the-pandemic-was-not-a-mistake/
GB News are currently conducting a ‘post mortem’ of the pandemic on the Dan Wooten slot, Robert Jenrick last night is still insisting the government took the right decisions at the right time.
We’ll revisit that statement in a few months, Robert.
“He would, wouldn’t he”. When it’s not been about profiteering and domineering, it’s a massive arse-covering exercise by people who are either very clever and dishonest, or very stupid and equally dishonest.
Damehoods, knighthoods, peerages and other bunce all round.
I think the Court Of Public Opinion goes deeper into the crux of the issue. I don’t see dan Wotton questioning the dodgy PCR tests, or asymptomatic transmission etc, or even the clot shots. It’s almost like they’re some sort of relief valve.
I’m with Reiner Fuellmich all day.
Me too; I suspect that DW might have an editorial leash attached as far as those elements are concerned – he cannot be unaware given his strident position on other CV19 bollox.
Ron,
We had great hopes for GB news but now apart from Nigel Mark and the bearded Scot, we are about to give up.
Their coverage of the Ukraine invasion is far from believable.
It really disses us off when each of the above has to bring on -usually a female – who has not learned the rudiments of drawing breath so that the hosts can get a word in sideways.
“He would say that , wouldn’t he?”
Oh here we go. Sleepyheads waking up. John Campbell has switched has he? Dozy old geezer finally reading the fineprint is he. After all this time, all those ticks with his blue pen. But careful: in no way should this article be taken as a discouragement to get the clot shot though, because, ‘vaccines are the greatest most wonderful thing science has ever invented’.
Medicine is the only area of “science” where the practitioners seem to be trained to expect reverence from others, and by implication it is expected that we should never question them. There are no exceptions to the old adage “There is no such thing as a free lunch”. Vaccines do not escape the rules of risks, benefits, manufacturing tolerances and the law of unexpected consequences due to insufficient knowledge.
Vaccines didn’t save the world, engineers did, by providing clean water, sanitation and decent living conditions. The whole vaccine industry should be dismantled, it is quite clear that the bastards have lied, still lie, and will lie again. The practice of medicine needs to return to small scales to keep the state, vested interests and other influencers out and to ensure patient privacy.
Half way through RFK Jnr tome, that is spot on so far.
Read it, read it, read it! I’m three-quarters’ way through.
Well I spend a lot of time involved in the greatest science fraud of all time Man/Woman Made Global Warming.
I can assure you this injection fraud is small beer in comparison
I would say that the tried, tested and effective vaccines that we have been using for decades are in general a good thing for mankind, although I wouldn’t be quite as gushing as to say they’re the “most wonderful thing”. Given that their origin was in astute observation and some experimentation 220 or so years ago, it’s surprising that more progress hasn’t been made.
None of this applies to the perverted science of gene therapy, masquerading as “vaccine”, cooked up and applied with minimal testing and total dishonesty; not, apparently, for the principal benefit of Mankind, but to make shedloads of money.
As The TartanEagle suggests, I am astonished at the combination of arrogance, gullibility, incuriosity and stupidity of so many medical practitioners and “scientists”. If mere laymen can obtain, read and understand, with open minds, the information available, whilst retaining the ability to question and “read between the lines”, one might suppose, or hope, that more of those responsible for the patients to whom they are administering this stuff might have a similar frame of mind and approach. I suppose the £15 per, and £20 at weekends might have weakened their intellects, such as they are.
I have only selectively watched Campbell’s videos, but I don’t take exception to them.
He has managed to very carefully give out information which is damning without being closed down, some feat over the last two years.
I think you have to be attuned to his style, he throws give away statements in a sardonic manner to keep the show on the road, but they are done in such a way that it its easy to read what message he is giving. He is a sceptic.
I gave up on him long ago. Not nearly fierce enough for my tastes. Staying in the good books of the censors doesn’t win any brownie points for me. The article says that he only switched recommending the vaccines as a result of this new information which has just come out. So if that’s true, and Dr Campbell has been recommending the so-called COVID vaccines all along until last week, then that is completely indefensible. If you don’t take exception to someone recommending the vaccines up until last week, then you aren’t a sceptic, you’re a Big Pharma cheerleader.
His Youtube revenue may be bringing in more than Moderna at this point.
Id estimate he has brought in not far off a million over the length of the pandemic!
I wonder how your estimation went. Care to share your workings?
He’s offering a free pdf download of his two medical books, so he can’t be that mercenary.
You need 300-500 million views for that money. If you think he had that in 2 years then ha made a million pounds.
I’d say I’m somewhat of a Campbell fan, but he has certainly been enthused by the vaxxes until very recently.
To give him his due, he has featured data on Ivermectin for months, now.
Better to deliver your message somehow than be cancelled by Gluggle, Facelift etc?
Same here. I haven’t seen all of them, but he’s done well to remain on You Tube in the circumstances. Sometimes the editing is quite clever, e.g. one of them was produced as an interview with an Australian specialist, in which they managed to express their attitude without actually using terms that might have them in difficulty, as it were.
I see Dr. Campbell differently. He has seen through a lot of the lies and falsehoods but has trod carefully. Staying on YouT (not being censored) can demand a delicate balance and by saying that he supported vaxxn but in the next breath that he couldn’t “understand at all” why something was so or “You’ll have to ask so-and-so why that should be” he was walking that narrow line. Listen to him talking about vitamin D, for example, and his puzzlement as to why the UK health authorities hadn’t recommended it. He knows full well why they hadn’t.
For those who have missed it, the story of how Ivermectin was cancelled (so the gene therapies could be given emergency authorisation)
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/the-story-of-how-ivermectin-was-cancelled/
The High wire was a good listen this week with Dr Tess Lawrie, goes over what is in The Real Anthony Fauci. She does get across how angry she is with Andrew Hill. People really do need to wake up to this.
Dr Been put up good video yesterday covering some of the Pfizer documents called Pfizer Vaccine Side Effects of Special Interest From the Court Ordered Documents
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQNOUYRykUI
In a subsequent video he talks about the attempts to silence him. Very sad that this is happening to such a thoroughly decent and brilliant individual.
Daft question Why do people still use those stinkin’ Tube you Buckface and other Silly Con valley outfits when they censor the truth?
I see even Duck Drake has now gone over to the dark side. There are ample alternatives.
The Israeli scientist giving his lecture at Davos won’t be stopped by this, they have bigger plans to totally change the DNA of humans, it was never just fiction where mad scientists try to take over the world. The Davos audiences look as if they are already mind altered the way they sit focused on the lunatics on the stage.
The awesome lock downs, face masks and vaccines: all brought to us by the same media and government gang that is now bringing us a twenty year war with Russia.
Having already brought us wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, the unintended seeding of Al Qaeda, Taliban and ISIS plus an uncounted number of civilian deaths.
Pots calling kettle black.
The news keeps getting worse.
Sorry to say it, but for those expecting bombshells from what will now become an endless train of scandals as more information emerges, you are going to be disappointed. Nothing done in relation to Covid medication is new. Flawed, fixed and fraudulent trials, smearing and cancelling of medical figures who challenged the money-spinning narrative, dozy, compliant media far more keen to hype the vial threats than follow the money. All these things come from the playbook that Fauci started writing in 1976 over a faked Swine flu scare in the US. He perfected it as part of the $trillion industry that surrounds the HIV/AIDS scenario, and rolled it out for a series of apparent viral threats culminating in the great Covid fraud. Fauci is directly and indirectly responsible for the death of hundreds of thousands through reckless trials of highly toxic and typically useless vaccines and medications, especially in Africa where – with a little help from Bill Gates and corrupt governments – whole populations were put at his disposal to test what he liked. Having got away with equally corrupt practices for 50 years, sadly I think that continued disinterest and collusion from government and the media mean that… Read more »
Sadly, I agree with everything you write.
Dr John is a bit behind the times !!!!
Wonder if YouTube will bin him off now lol
That’s what’s so fascinating (and unique) about him. He was pro-narrative for so long that to censor him now would be very conspicuous and would effectively be to admit that the narrative is being controlled by shadowy corporate forces. Covidians all subscribe to him, having grown fond of watching him underline things and put asterisks next to things for most of the pandemic 😵💫
Yes and I’m not sure what the Covidians think, precisely, when he comes out with the off-message stuff. They don’t seem to be tuning out by the figures, so perhaps a message or two is getting through. I suppose if you are super-fearful about your health, then news of alternative treatments and suspect vaccines ought, in theory, to be of interest—if they are believed when MSM says little or nothing.
My impression is that many of his subscribers are international, since they frequently complain about the lack of reliable news and data in their own countries.
I know what they think – there are threads on mumsnet about how he has gone mad
Sorry to say but can covidians actually think?
In the interests of full disclosure, he does also occasionally draw outlines around complete phrases. I wonder if it’s just so he keeps a track of where he is on the page, since he admits he’s a little dyslexic and has trouble reading numbers when he’s doing the videos.
I rather like the amateurishness of it. Were it slicker, I’d suspect Pharmas grasping hand somewhere in the background.
Judging by the sound quality of some of his early stuff, Santa brought him a better quality microphone this year or last.
The only shocking things is that apparently it’s a surprise to people – (or rather it would be if it was properly reported in the MSM).
Anyone who knows anything about big pharma knows it’s second nature to them. They’ve had a lifetime of doing it. They have special departments/expertise dedicated to this.
They set the criteria, they set the exam, they mark their own results, they lobby the MSM and TRPTB.
Just read Kennedy’s book, The Real Anthony Fauci.
Everyone should be made to read it – for the greater good – that’s the “new” in phrase I’m led to believe.
I’m ploughing toward the end of it. Something of a surprise that Fauci and his backers haven’t engineered a ‘grassy knoll’ moment yet.
Kennedy’s done the world a real favour with his opus. Now it’s a question of getting it read by enough people.
FOr me the most important element is the continuing update of the key issues. This “existentialist” for me and no going back.
Many/most of us saw the exact same table of organs where the vaccine ends up months and months ago from the leaked Japanese Pfizer documents. But it was just a “conspiracy theory”.
I remember that came up more than half year ago. Harvey Risch showed the paper on trialsitenews when I first heard about it in July 2021. One of my main points to refuse this vaccine together with the Swedish study about dna damage repair.
Astonishing. Talking to a triple vaccinated friend last night, who showed me an exchange with her doctor by email. She had had persistent pins and needles for about 8 weeks after the first two Pfizer shots. Her doctor was completely dismissive of the idea that this was connected to the vaccine – ‘No I don’t think it’s got anything to do with that’ was his response. She has subsequently learned that this is a symptom of blood clots. Her father, who suffers from an autoimmune syndrome, had become very ill after his, eventually losing his sight. The doctor was completely dismissive of the idea that this was related to the vaccine. I think on balance it’s the medical professions I’m most angry with. Big Pharma was just being its usual fraudulent criminal self. Doctors, with their blinkered stupid absolute faith in pharmaceuticals, are the ones who have really betrayed their patients’ trust. Dr John Campbell could have known this well over a year ago if he’d been brave enough to investigate.
I’ve only watched a couple of Campbell’s videos, but I get the impression he’s been walking the tightrope of getting the information and discussion out there, without the inevitable ban that has gone with it. He might find this one get’s removed..
He’s an interesting case. He was generally beloved by Covidians because he took the narrative at face value whilst providing very superficial analyses of approved sources of information. But fundamentally he’s a good actor, so he’s been honest about his growing scepticism, much to the annoyance of erstwhile fans. Now hardcore Covidians hate him and think he’s gone mad / down the rabbit hole 😂 just because he’s now saying patently obvious things. Quite funny really. He recently appeared on Russell Brand’s YT channel so that must mean that he has truly crossed the rubicon.
John Campbell is not a physician, he has a PhD in education and is currently registered as a nurse with the NMC.
Yes, sorry, I was referring to my friend’s doctor (and a few others I know!)
If he were a physician, he’d have been too busy jabbing people to have time to maintain a YT channel.
I’ve said on these pages a couple times now that when my partner sought sleeping tablets for stress due to the NHS jab mandate, the Doctor wrote on the prescription that her stress was due to the Christmas rush.
Same doctor rejected my partner’s claim for an exemption to the jab. Same doctor has now jabbed my eight year old nephew.
Something has happened to these doctors over the last couple years. Is it money? Political? Threats against their jobs?
I remember asking the DR for some sleeping tablets that I used before, he said there is a safety concern with them and prescribed a different sort. So they can follow safety data when it suits them.
A distinction does need to be drawn there.
With regard to the tablets, he would be liable for mis-prescribing if he didn’t have regard to the safety data, as he was the one giving the medical advice regarding the tablets.
when it comes to the jabs, the doctors are probably exempt from liability for administering the jabs if someone subsequently suffers a harm
Without meaning to generalise too much, I think many doctors are on the autism spectrum; they seem to think in fairly black and white terms and if the screen in front of them suggests a particular course of action because the NICE guidelines say so, they follow this unquestioningly. They have been trained this way, and everything leads to a pharmaceutical solution. The ‘vaccine’ recommendations were top-down and it would have taken an unusual doctor with a slightly rebellious nature (not many of them) and the time to investigate to go up against this. I think that’s all it is. Of course, many doctors made a personal fortune from the ‘vaccine’ programme but I don’t think this is the main driver of their collusion.
They know that doing their own research is dangerous.
If you do your own research you might realise the official position is wrong.
If you know the official position is wrong then that puts you in a moral dilemma, if you challenge the orthodoxy you will be punished.
If you refuse to do your own research and just accept what authority tells you then your position is safe and you can earn lots of extra money jabbing people safe in the knowledge that ‘I was only following orders’ if you kill/injure people.
But maybe not your daughter?
I believe it’s simply a case that they don’t want to lose their job, or face the raucous wave of hostility from TPTB. I imagine they’ve been warned about it by their managers and wouldn’t dare step out of line.
There’s little point in thinking for yourself when the CDC, FDA, PHE and UKHSA do it for you.
And if you oppose The Narrative, you get threatening letters from the GMC, as Dr Kendrick has pointed out.
I think both you and CG have nailed it.
That is very true. I work with a few doctors who left because medicine is not what they thought it would be: they have to act unthinkingly following an alogorithm. They left to use their brains.
Guess who is left in medicine?
“First do no harm” to a Drs lifestyle, there’s always other patients,
It’s a combination of their education and desire. Much like the priesthood, medicine is really a vocation, or it used to be. Now, much like dentistry etc, this is a profession that attracts those who want money and status, in the manner thst accountancy begets money , if not status. The minority who are truly interested in medicine become specialists in their field or drift overseas where they feel they can make a genuine difference. GPS your first port of call, generally but obviously not exclusively , tends to be where the money/ status people remain.
I don’t think it’s got anything to do with faith. It’s agreed. Most people don’t know that GP’s are paid to administer vaccines, as far as I can remember something like £15 per shot.
I think most docs have been so gung-ho for this foisting of vaxes that they don’t want to think what they might have been a part of.
I watched Dr Campbell very early on in February 2020 and he was a very big advocate for using vitamin D, I based my own supplementation on the research he described. I became annoyed with him over his mask and vaccine advocacy. He is quite deferential to experts, he is essentially trusting and a little naive in in respect for the motives of these actors, often confused why the authorities wouldn’t, for example, recommend mass supplementation of vitamin D.
He has now eventually become red pilled. He’s been on a journey that has been fascinating to watch. I’m convinced he is genuinely sincere in his belief in doing good for people. I think he has only just realised that not everyone one he trusted and relied on also shared these intentions.
As Gillian Dymond has asked in TCW, and Debi Evans has asked for UK Column…Where is June Raine? Where is the forensic risk assessment for the “vaccines”? Why are the mounting death’s and myriad adverse reactions being OBVIOUSLY covered up?
As the fully awake are aware, this is mass murderer and the war in Ukraine is a very very convenient “look over here, don’t look over there” event!
yes that is where my anger is directed: the regulators. They are there to safeguard everyone’s safety. They have been criminal in their negligence, and complicit in the harm.
Years of hard labour would be insufficient punishment.
Facebook don’t like this article – they took it down within minutes of it being posted.
So they were already performing ‘doses’ of the fake vaccine in the early trial period. Normal vaccines don’t require doses and so-called boosters.
Normal vaccines would still be going through these trials right now and into the future before people gave their consent to be jabbed.
Unfortunately the clotshot is not a vaccine and it’s intended purpose is yet to be revealed.
Actually most vaccines do have a booster stage. Typhoid lasts 5 years without a repeat. Hepatitis A lasts for 10 years. All of the childhood vaccinations are multiple doses, the final tetanus being given aged 16.
You’re talking years (multiples), above talks about three of four jabs in a period of months. That is not remotely comparable.
The 6 in 1 is administered three times over a period of 8 weeks, at 8 weeks old, 12 weeks old and 16 weeks old. Meningitis B at 8 weeks old and 16 weeks old, with a third dose at 12 months old.
When they started jabbing they only mentioned 2, didn’t they?
Which means they always intended there to be more but were lying to us, or is yet more evidence that nothing remotely resembling proper testing took place.
If you have the time it would be good to have a reasoned opinion on some of the studies mentioned in this :-
http://vaccinepapers.org/
I must admit being “anti vax” since the early 90’s after being involved in Court cases re dangers of blood transfusions and having touched upon vaccine compensation damage claims.
Even back then it was impossible to obtain a nuanced view one way or the other and it would be useful to have an opposing view.
Once I have access to my home PC then I can more easily have a look at those papers.
Thank you.
Correct. none of those mentioned are respiratory viruses and they give sterilising immunity once the appropriate dosage is completed, that means the recipient gains immunity to the specific virus inoculated against, and does not transmit.
The mRNA experiments do not so they are not properly called ‘vaccines’.
Measles and rubella are technically upper respiratory tract infections.
Some did need short term multiples. If you look at my record sheet (attached), at the bottom of the list you will see that the Rabies one was essentially 3 in 4 weeks.
Historic list – occasionally used for some journeys.
It doesn’t matter, this won’t see the light of day in MSM, and that’s all the sheep feed on. I believe Covid was a trial and, if successful, the first stage of the Great Reset. Stage 1 (Covid). Test the water: Test docile obedience of authority can be easily obtained Test that docile obedience extends to wilfully giving up basic freedoms Test that docile obedience extends to wilfully discriminating against a non-conforming subset of society Test that docile obedience extends to loss of rational and willingness to do anything for ‘the Greater Good’ If successful the infrastructure and conditions will have been laid for stage 2 Stage 2 (war): Rinse and repeat propaganda strategy of stage 1. This achieves 1,2,3 & 4 of above and is a tried and tested formula Escalate manufactured war brinksmanship to usher in sanctions that will cause food & fuel to become rationed Seize some private assets (in the name of ‘the Greater Good’) and place under state ownership Restrict personal wealth (in the name of ‘the Greater Good’) and place into state coffers Stage 3 (the [final] solution): Offer ‘way out’, which is state coming to the rescue via economic overhaul (CBDC) and social… Read more »
Chin up; just been sent this:
https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/1577745/Pfizer-vaccine-side-effects-adverse-effects
Doesn’t go into detail but might just cause a flutter at the breakfast tables of Britain.
This sort of thing is key. Reporting the truth should erode trust in authority and MSM. I say ‘should’ because most people are just too far gone and are naturally submissive. But there’s always hope of a mass realisation I suppose.
Blimey that’s a (bit of a) breakthrough…
If you watched UK Column News yesterday, an MP Christopher Cope was talking about vaccine side effects compensation to pretty much an empty room; only , once he mentioned the vaccine two people walked out. this is a disgrace compared to the full house offered to the Ukrainian President.
Ukrainian Oligarch Puppet.
The target date is 2030.
Despite recent claims that the vaccines were only ever intended to reduce serious illness,
They’re not recent claims.
The pharma companies stated, right from the beginning of this horror show, that the ‘vaccines’ could only reduce serious symptoms.
This is why they were described as gene therapy…until the dictionary definition of ‘vaccine’ was officially changed.
There was a concerted effort by the MSM the other day to glamorise gene therapy.
Without even a hint of irony, they applaud claims that the Chinese have utilised gene therapy to supposedly extend life.
Over to Reuters…
Your are right, but few sheep access information sources other than MSM, so they would gear only what Govt and MSM said and kept repeating which was they stopped disease and stopped spread. But even what the pharmas said was not true. The ‘trials’ carried out on the 16 to 65 age group of healthy people, only measured effectiveness to prevent infection turning to disease. Absolute Risk Reduction being 0,84%. The trial was not designed to measure reduction of symptoms or safety. It specifically omitted the cohort, elderly with comorbidity, the very group in which this discriminating virus was active which could have provided information on its effect on severity. The ‘less serious’ claims we now hear have as much supporting evidence as they did at the start, that is none. Those who now have realised the claims that the pseudo-vaccines would stop disease, stop spread were nit true are idiots if they believe the ‘less serious’ claims. Alas, the previous claims were falsifiable, the less serious claims are not falsifiable. My view is they knew all along it was junk, but a good opportunity to try the experimental mRNA agent on millions/billions of subjects without the usual regulatory rigour… Read more »
The original claim was that the vaccine reduces the chance of you becoming infected which was shown by the original data. Their was no experiment done to demonstrate anything else.
They initially claimed that the shots were 95% effective at preventing people from catching covid, this was complete cobblers as the trials were manipulated to high heaven.
it’s now 300% effective at MAKING you catch covid over the jab dodgers.
The summary in John Campbell’s video, echos pretty much what we’ve been saying here for 2 years. The whole reaction to Covid was a continuous case of crying wolf, when in fact it was a slightly unruly dog. It will take years to rebuild any trust in public health officials.
John Campbell seems to be tripping up somewhat on certain issues. Good to see he is seeing how the regulators are completely captured and have outright lied to the people, however, given his profile and reach now, he needs to be a little more thorough.
His recent piece on Ivermectin in Florida over egged a study and one of the lead authors, a medical student, didn’t take too kindly to it.
https://youtu.be/szJGEIEudq0
Did the JCVI and the MHRA have sight of these documents before approving the gene therapy aka vaccine?
If they did, how could they possibly approve it for the general population? If they did not, why not? and how did they manage to approve the GT/Vax without sight of it?
A very good question. I have long had a sense that press releases from pfisser et al. saying how fabulous the vaxxes worked pre-empted the course that regulators followed. Politicians had f-d up big time by following China, found out that the lurgi had not left after March 2020 and (in their minds) had to impose another lockdown, how else otherwise to explain the need for the first one. The vaxx was to be the way out of that quagmire. So the seeds were sown by the vaxx producers, were spread far and wide in the media, the politicians picked up the ball and ran with it and made it easy for the regulators to go ahead and authorise merely on the basis of what someone else said. There’s a video with that CDC idiot Walensky saying how excited they were when CNN informed them that the vaxx worked. Hey? Shouldn’t it have been the CDC informing CNN? Same here, the head of the OMT said the information about the vaxx was positive – adding the caveat that he had only seen the press releases. He also said at one point that the vaxx had been fully authorised by the… Read more »
You are applying logic where it does not belong. These EGT’s were always going to be rolled out because they were part of the initial strategy of the Reset.
The EGT’s have been brewed to a recipe such that the adverse reactions, the ongoing illnesses like myocarditis etc could be dismissed as coincidences. The EGT’s were brewed to specifically maim and kill in both the short and long term – the long term being 2030.
Remember: we were all protected by the Nuremberg code that made it the worst crime to force people to take an experimental treatment.
We were protected by the human rights act, by the freedom of information act, by common law, by many other acts.
And they were all ignored. It’s not just the science that failed, it is the law, the police, the government, the media, they all failed us.
Free, civil society and democracy emerge from institutions. When those institutions fail, so do our societies. That is exactly what has happened.
What’s worse is that the Government have discovered what their limits where, which pieces of legislation hampered their aims, and they are now pushing through the legislation to get around it. As if Covid was a trial run for whatever is coming next, once they have removed the legal safety nets.
We’ve been over this again and again and again. The Nuremberg code does not create crimes. It does not contain laws. No court enforces it.
It’s more what you’d call guidelines. Some nations codified some parts of it a laws, or as codes of professional conduct. That’s the entire extent of it.
This repeated assertion that it’s some Holy Writ that can be plead directly in a court of law is infantile and weak. Be better than that.
That’s why they were ignoring it I suppose!
Am I right in concluding that actually, the real criminals here are the approval bodies? It looks like Pfizer were at least somewhat honest about just how terrible these “vaccines” were, yet they received approval anyway.
I remember way back when the vaccines were first approved thinking, firstly, that at the age of 30 I did not need to be vaccinated against a cold, but also that the climate of hysteria was not one conducive to rational, clear-headed science or balanced decisions. The “vaccines” were always doomed to fail because nobody was thinking straight. There was a total desperation to approve something, anything, as our (or rather governments’) way out of the “pandemic.”
Pfizer could have submitted literally anything and it would have received approval, no matter what.
Not just the regulators. MHRA certainly failed in the UK, on their own terms, but so did NICE. Health Economics was thrown right out of the window by NICE, you genuinely have to wonder what they have been doing for two years. What do they do all day?
https://www.bmj.com/content/341/bmj.c3581/rapid-responses
NICE allows its guideline development group members to have conflicts of interest so long as the conflicts of interest are 12 months old and are stated up front. So they could have received millions in funding, so long as it was 12 months ago. And then they can participate in writing guidelines on that very drug/drug company.
‘There was a total desperation to approve something, anything,’
Not so. They did all they could to discredit established, cheap repurposed treatments.
For those in power the new and expensive vaccines (along with the vax passports) were always the only game in town.
I think what was implied was that the desperation was to approve something, anything that would make money for Pharma. The rubbishing of alternative, approved early treatment choices would not have taken place when it did, had the vaxes not required ’emergency’ authorisation.
Remarkably – or perhaps not – the disgusting BBC continues to gaslight victims of vaccine injury: Covid vaccines not linked to deaths, major US study finds – BBC News
Seriously, how do these vermin sleep at night?
Hopefully with just a little bit of anxiety about the three doses of cytotoxin they queued up for and then bragged about on Facebook.
So how do the un-jabbed know to start dying en-masse within two weeks of their age group getting jabbed?
It’s must be true, the BBC have said it’s false.
You’re assuming they need to sleep at night?
Its weird because when you read the actual study, the data do not make the points reached in the conclusion or in the headlines. They show that there is a ton of raised risk when it comes to all kinds of side effects, and “most” being “mild” is frankly irrelevant. That some are not mild is the point – because some is not vanishingly rare.
If this is what the early pfizer data looked like and it still got approved as ‘safe and effective’, just imagine what the early Astra-Zeneca data must have looked like for it to be quietly shelved. Just wondering if we can get hold of the equivalent UK document for the AZ vax. Also – I would like to see some attack ads showing various UK politicians promoting the jab, inter-cut with stats from these documents and first hand accounts of adverse side effects. These shysters cannot be allowed to get away with this scam scot-free (Javid, Zahiwi, Johnson etc). We need to ruin their political careers – pour encourager les autres.
The astrazenica vaccine uses an adenovirus (type 5) as it’s delivery system. If old Clever clogs Sarah Gilbert would have even googled “adenovirus type 5 ” she would have seen that it’s been known to be linked with blood clotting since the 60’s!!!
She is a murderer.
so why did she get a damehood and a standing ovation on Wimbledon’s centre court (which greatly impressed my father but completely disgusted me)?
I really have little sympathy for these drones that lined up ignoring the warnings. They brought it on themselves.
We need these people on our side.
We need them to wake up and realise they have been conned by the government.
Best to frame it that way rather than to be critical.
Agreed.
Every day new horrors expose the real damage done by the mass ’emergency’ vaccination campaign – and yet every day more of our children are vaccinated by this Government and its Health Minister Javid. regardless of any consequences and with the nodding consent of all out MPs.
This is irresponsibility by Government Ministers regarding the health of children on a scale never before experienced in this country
The conclusions we must draw surely get more frightening by the hour.
We now have discoveries of Bio labs in Ukraine funded by the US and sponsored by Fauci- accused of manipulating the virus itself and the vaccine roll out in the US – so where does it all lead?
On present evidence it seems to be: ‘The Heart of Darkness’?
Meanwhile I’m currently in a room with 25 15-16 year olds who have taken two doses of this poisonous bullshit because idiot grown-ups told them it was safe and the right thing to do. Even the ones who privately expressed scepticism to me ultimately ended up taking it. I feel very, very angry right now.