News Round-Up

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

70 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago

“The public health emergency is over” So some restrictions to end. But no acknowledgement of what this cabal might have got wrong. No mention of Sweden, Belarus and South Dakota among other places, which clearly demonstrate that the lockdowns killed (and will continue to kill for many years) far more people than they purportedly saved. No mention of the rigged vitamin D trials which were nothing like the Orthomolecular Medicine News Service recommended. No detailed mortality figures giving people’s vitamin D, vitamin C, zinc, selenium, magnesium and vitamin K levels (to say nothing of BMI, Ivermectin, Quercetin etc.). No mention that poor people and coloured people (we’re not supposed to say “BAME” now) are more likely to be unhealthy and less likely to have these “vaccines” (hence the figures from those London hospitals). And of course no hint that the leading spirits in this foolery might have any sort of conflict of interest with the pharmaceutical industry. No mention of figures from Romania, Israel (which yesterday recorded its highest deaths with “covid” according to Worldometer) or Gibraltar (or Kenya) and what we might learn from them. We must go on asking questions and pushing for them to be held properly… Read more »

Lockdown Sceptic
4 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

Trudeau dictatorship turns to brutality against peaceful protesters, journalists CANADA HAS FALLEN: The once-free nation is now under UN occupation and globalist control, with no mechanism remaining for peaceful return to democracy
https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-02-21-canada-has-fallen-un-occupation-globalist-control-democracy.html
 by: Mike Adams

 It’s not over yet. They are jabbing primary school children. Keep up the resistance here.  

Thursday 24th February 4pm to 5pm 
 Yellow Boards By the Road  
A321 Finchampstead Rd
Junction Sandhurst Rd & B3016 Finchampstead Rd, 
Wokingham RG40 3JS

Stand in the Park Sundays 10am  make friends, ignore the madness & keep sane 
Wokingham Howard Palmer Gardens Cockpit Path car park Sturges Rd RG40 2HD  
Henley Mills Meadows (at the bandstand) Henley-on-Thames RG9 1DS

Telegram Group 
http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago

Yes, Trudeau is a vile, evil man, isn’t he?

Thank you for drawing attention to these stories.

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago
Reply to  Alter Ego

Yes. Toby questions WEF influence to be fair.

Anyway, my “bad anecdote” is that. 20 odd years ago, I read a fictional novel about a new world order takeover. And many aspects of the current shambles strike me as worse than what was described in that book. Dark times…

Star
4 years ago

On-topic (in the news and of interest to sceptics, ahem): war. For those whose radar he hasn’t yet appeared on, permit me to introduce Vladimir Zhirinovsky, the leader of the Russian Liberal Democratic Party who does a masterful “nutter-thug” act – e.g. calling for the Russian annexation of Finland, chucking water at people in the Duma, and so on. He’s kept it up for more than 30 years ago, and is widely known to have been a KGB pet. A measure of his importance in the early 1990s is that in 1993 his party won a plurality (23%!) of voteshare in the Dum aelections . Anyway…guess what he said on 27 December last year. Referencing 4am on 22 February 2022 he said he’d like 2022 to be peaceful but as a lover of the truth he must say that it won’t be peaceful – that in fact it will be a year when once again Russia attains the condition of greatness. Why 4am? Does he keep Paris time, in which the said moment (about 70 minutes from now) is known as 02:00, 22-02-2022? Maybe somebody should tell him that even numbers are mostly considered feminine? While that’s true, it shouldn’t… Read more »

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago
Reply to  Star

Good old war. Maybe the bedwetters will have something real to worry about.

Are we going to get those cyber attacks then, and how major would they be?

I remember thinking (I think around the time of the Georgian war) when Russia was reportedly giving out Russian passports to anyone in the Crimea who wanted them, “surely they won’t declare war on the Ukraine”? But now the Crimea is gone, Donetsk and Luhansk are in a civil war (provoked by the Brussels and Strassburg and Letzebuerg regime), Russia has recognised their independence from the UK and is sending in “peacekeepers”. I wonder how much of this current situation is due to the West being distracted by a Winter virus over the past two years. One thing’s for sure, they need to get a grip on real issues like geo-politics and the disastrous state of the economy (and society) and stop obsessing over a virus, and the weather, and whether men are women.

pjar
4 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

“Are we going to get those cyber attacks then, and how major would they be?”

So far, they seem to be limited to a gaggle of dodgy Russian birds upvoting everything posted on Disqus… the threat is real.

Londo Mollari
4 years ago
Reply to  Star

Why worry about Russia? the threat to westerners comes from their own governments. Vladimir Zhirinsovsky ahs never been in government, Justin Trudeau and Emmanuel Macron are running tyrannical governments.

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago
Reply to  Londo Mollari

Certainly I’ve been wondering if we would be any worse off under a Putin government with some of the stuff that’s been going on. Still, make no mistake, this will hit an already shattered global economy, and perhaps be used as an excuse for worse abuses by Western governments.

Moist Von Lipwig
4 years ago

The article by Heydon Prowse for Spiked is evil, it praises Extinction Rebellion, Net Zero and Socialism.

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago

“Tyrant Trudeau ends Ottawa ‘siege’ “.

The interesting question now is what will happen in the so-called States, particularly Washington, District of Columbia?

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago

“Big pharma influences journals to publish negative studies on Ivermectin”.

Don’t I know it! As I’ve said before, they were doing a similar thing with apricot kernels/laetrile years ago. More damningly, the Times muppets, who have Oliver Wright working for them, a man who knows all about this sort of behaviour by the pharmaceutical industry, but seemingly that paper refuses to publish articles properly critiquing big pharma’s role in the current shambles – and then a Times editor has the cheek to castigate btl commenters on this site. These distortions must not be forgotten.

Toby, if you come up against a Times editor again, please pull him up on this.

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago

“The CDC are lying about ‘vaccine’ side effects” (Steve Kirsch).

Is that the CDC that are in bed with big pharma?

Phil Shannon
4 years ago

ITEM: “Hundreds of unvaccinated BHP workers to be sacked” – Mining giant BHP is set to lose between 2% and 3% of its workforce after instituting a Covid vaccine mandate for all staff in its Australian operations, reports the Mail. The ‘Big Australian’ (BHP) employs a lot of people in mining and the 2-3% of workers who will lose their job for declining the Covid Goo amounts to around 700 unvaxxed mining workers being sacked for retaining their medical and bodily autonomy (which is as fundamental a human right as there is). The mass sacking comes after the mining union (the CFMEU) lost a court case against the company’s mandate. Just when the unions (who have been quite miserable on all things Covid by phrasing the whole issue in terms of ‘workplace health and safety’ and thus buying into the hysteria that the virus is uniquely deadly to all and that the vaxx [and therefore its mandates and passports] is the Saviour) – when a union (a good, old-fashioned blue-collar, manual labour type of union) does the right thing, the workers still lose because the courts are part of the problem, too. In related news, of the approximately 720 players in the… Read more »

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago
Reply to  Phil Shannon

We have much to learn from Romania where reportedly people who didn’t want the “vaccine” would ask to be injected “not in the arm” (I think), with many doctors etc. going along with it.

I seem to remember a story about the hard running Leeds United English Premier League team being the most “vaccinated” team in that league, and tending to flag towards the end of matches as a result. That was the story anyway. It would have been interesting to see how Djokovich would’ve done in the Australian tennis Open. Did they let any exemptions in in the end (And was that poor ball girl the only medical incident)?

Phil Shannon
4 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

There were 26 applications for an exemption to the Aus Open but only four in total were granted. hese included Djokovic (who had to have his upheld by a Federal Court judge before he was deported for ideological Wrongthink), Renata Vorocova (who was deported and strip-searched on her way out the airport), and two others who were sent packing. So it looks like no exemptions actually made it on to court (we run a tight Vaxx Narrative ship down here, obviously).

And the poor ball girl who collapsed – well, the ‘fact-checkers’ were immediately onto the case and declared it to be due to smoke from a far-off bushfire – so her vaxx misadventure can be taken to have some face-value validity if the ‘fact-checkers’ are trying to deny it.

Alter Ego
Alter Ego
4 years ago
Reply to  Phil Shannon

Melbourne was on fire?! I missed it!
Bet it was that dreadful CFMEU and those protestors …

Alter Ego
Alter Ego
4 years ago
Reply to  Phil Shannon

What happens, I wonder, when the season begins and the “vaccinated” (whatever was in their shots) infect each other?

when will the world wake up
when will the world wake up
4 years ago
Reply to  Alter Ego

If you follow professional cycling you will see this happening all the time already… riders and teams having to leave races. Maybe they will start to see that their plans are seriously flawed!

Massimo Osti
4 years ago
Reply to  Phil Shannon

Phil, what are your thoughts on Clive Palmer? He sounds like an ‘interesting character’.

Phil Shannon
4 years ago
Reply to  Massimo Osti

Very ‘colourful’, indeed. Most people (myself included) viewed him as a joke candidate in his past tilts at political glory (although he did win a House of Reps seat) but my view of the man has changed completely. He has stood shoulder-to-shoulder with Freedom Protesters to end the public health tyranny and is quite sincere, not merely opportunistic, in his latest electoral endeavour based on opposition to Covid madness. He is attracting a lot of support from all those who have suffered under the restrictions/mandates.

If a mining billionaire with a Trump-like character and ego joins us, that is to be welcomed. He has media clout (despite the censorship) and his wealth is funding some excellent TV adverts which make for splendid payback for all the relentless propaganda from the government.

I will be voting for him – the people’s billionaire!!

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago

“Significant adverse physical or psychological impact” (Online Safety Bill).

What on Earth are they talking about? It reminds me of what happened in my particular area of interest (pro-life issues) where they said that there would be an exemption to rules protecting unborn children for mothers (or rather birth parents) who faced psychological harm from continuing a pregnancy, which ended up meaning any mother who said they didn’t want to continue with one (and never mind any pressure they’d been put under to “choose”, or the long term psychological harms from having children killed – I suspect a factor in our current fearful society).

I suspect that if the Online Harms Bill really goes through like that, it will more or less mean that they can simply ban any online content that they don’t like or goes against their narrative. Pretty much an end to free speech, I fear, especially with “Sir” Tony’s politicised “supreme” court. Very worrying.

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

I’ve been listening to Toby and James’s London Calling and it seems it’s worse than I thought. The “very serious, very bossy, very woke” head of Ofcom will apparently be in charge of this. The one who said that it’s fine for Sky to brainwash us on “net zero” (carbon emissions). What would the late, great Christopher Booker have made of it?

Alter Ego
Alter Ego
4 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

“Significant adverse physical or psychological impact”

This is dreadful. Are they referring to lockdowns, masking (and mandated testing, isolation and injections); or just threatening such things online?

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago
Reply to  Alter Ego

I dare say this and far more besides. I hope Toby will take up the good fight, that’s why I joined the Free Speech Union. I could never have imagined how bad it would have got way back in 2020…
I hope at any rate that if these totalitarian vigilantes try and restrict this site, they will at least know they have been in a fight!

Alter Ego
Alter Ego
4 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

I thought I couldn’t be shocked anymore.
Then I saw that Australian politicians were bragging about the rates at which children aged 5 to 11 were receiving experimental injections in their states.
I want a Day of Judgement.
What do we do about those who have contempt for human beings, and no fear of God to stay their hands?

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago
Reply to  Alter Ego

I wish I had an answer.

Zorn, to borrow a word.

Emerald Fox
4 years ago
Reply to  Alter Ego

5-11 year olds about to be ‘jabbed-for-Covid’ in the UK. There will be the usual exclamations of shock and horror… but, as we have seen with the 12-18 year olds, nothing will actually be done to stop it.

The ‘wave’ of the 3rd ‘booster’ will soon be tailing off… the main question is how will people keep their Vaxx Passes valid unless they take a 4th jab?

February 22nd 2022 today. Another few years of this and nobody will remember how life was pre-March 2020. The elderly are dying off, and the younger generations are becoming used to wearing face masks and taking the ‘vaccines’.

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago

Brighteon

(Courtesy of Fireweasel).

Tyrant Trudeau really does deserve to fall on his sword over this. In fact he probably deserves some profanity and abuse (among other things). I’ve never been more tempted. A peaceful old woman being trampled on by horses? This really is his Peterloo.

Incidentally I seem to remember allegations of women being duffed up at the London protests to provoke a reaction. These violent thugs and those controlling them really are no better than the CCP now.

What a vile evil man Trudeau is.

Paul B
4 years ago

Isn’t it odd that Jamal Edwards’ cause of death was reported as a sudden illness in the main stream, people who where there witnessed this ‘ilness’ causing sudden chest clenching followed by collapse and death.

Massimo Osti
4 years ago
Reply to  Paul B

Christopher Stalford (39) & Steve Black (64) also died over the weekend of ‘sudden illnesses’.

Amtrup
4 years ago

Great collection of links, thank you, especially the one from Dr Pieere Kory’s blog ref the Ivermectin disinformation/smear campaign, and the Hadley Freeman piece; I always liked her 80’s film reviews, good to see her speaking out against the gender-activist bullying.

Londo Mollari
4 years ago

Our politicians are wringing their hands over the threat to neo nazis in Ukraine but are generally silent about the neo nazis beating peaceful protesters, taking their kids and euthanising their dogs in Canada.

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago
Reply to  JayBee

I remain to be convinced that trying to change the weather (or time or tides) is an effective use of resources. Surely it would be more cost effective to build flood defences, move populations to less flood prone areas, invest in effective irrigation etc. ? I mean the weather doesn’t change that fast, and the fact is, there are loads of resources if they are used properly.

JohnK
4 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

The weather is always variable, from year to year. However, they (government agents etc) have had to invest in improvements recently, such as carrying out proper dredging on the Somerset Levels near Bridgwater and so on. All sorts of other ideas, such as growing more trees to reduce the risk of flash flooding via rivers, or even re-introducing wild beavers to do the job upstream, have been tried in various places.

MrTea
MrTea
4 years ago

‘The only justification for the state to impose constraints on the lives of the populace is if the country faces an emergency, yet this has not existed for some time, says the Telegraph in its leading article’

And who decides that there is such an emergency?
Why Government appointed experts, like Neil Ferguson who can knock up a fantasy computer model on demand or Chris Whitty who couldn’t predict what day of the week it will be tomorrow.
Add in a hand picked selection of careerist MPs that will vote for anything in exchange for a shot at being Minister of whatever and that is us well and truly screwed.

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago
Reply to  MrTea

Same sort of thing as the woke mob deciding that there is “significant adverse physical or psychological impact” from online comment. Commy nonsense basically.

P.S. I’m no expert, but I would tentatively suggest that “it’s Wednsday” tomorrow (I still love Dad’s Army in spite of everything!).

MrTea
MrTea
4 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

‘Same sort of thing as the woke mob deciding that there is “significant adverse physical or psychological impact”

Which the Tories fully support hence their support of ‘hate speech’ laws and their desire to cencor the internet with the digital harms Bill.

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago
Reply to  MrTea

I sometimes think that “Mark” and peter Hitchens are right…

Julian
4 years ago
Reply to  MrTea

Exactly. That’s why, in my view, there should be clear legal and cultural barriers to certain liberties being removed under any circumstances.

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago
Reply to  Julian

Does that mean no emergency powrs, or just limited emergency powers? Just think, 1933 could have been avoided with the correct legal safeguards…

Julian
4 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

I tend to think no emergency powers, at least not affecting basic freedoms. In general, you don’t need coercion in a real emergency.

huxleypiggles
4 years ago
Reply to  Julian

Except for the sharia mob.

A passerby
A passerby
4 years ago

This Government just can’t or won’t let go of covid, it’s become the bendy bus of healthcare. The last two years have completely destroyed any synergy and trust there may have been between the Government and the public. ‘Bloody hopeless’ doesn’t even begin to describe how I feel about this rabble. The concept of a deadly virus is one thing, launching an all out assault on the public to protect them from the concept is another. What else have they got up their sleeves?
All these years I’ve been under the misapprehension that they were paid servants to the public, working in the background to improve the lives for the majority (who put them there), how wrong could I have been!!
A message to the Government:- In case you hadn’t noticed, Private businesses are now deciding how to implement their own covid measures, what do you think it about that, or is it outside your bailiwick?

Annie
4 years ago

Tom Chodor’s panacea for Kiwi ills: more snake oil, more testing.
Job done, eh?

huxleypiggles
4 years ago
Reply to  Annie

A bloody awful piece if writing. Still clinging to the official storyline.

Annie
4 years ago

‘The public could previously order one pack of seven tests every 24 hours.’
My god. Have they got any noses left? Is that why they’re so keen to nappy their ruined faces?

iane
iane
4 years ago
Reply to  Annie

Yep: well at least it gives Gove an excuse should his nose disintegrate! (Nothing to do with that white powder, of course.)

Steve-Devon
4 years ago

I was interested to see the article by Hadley Freeman, I remember finding her very readable back in the days when I could still look at the Guardian and I was pleased to find she is as readable as ever. As she points out with this issue we are being sold a canard, a deception which does a disservice to many. Not least to women who now have to put up with being beaten at swimming by a trans swimmer and having to use gender neutral toilets as reported in the DM; https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10536737/West-End-drama-gender-neutral-toilets-Theatregoers-blast-gross-restrooms.html If the proverbial dispassionate observer from outer space was to come and observe our current human behaviour they would find our response to both covid and gender to be barking mad. We are following the stereotype trappings of gender and allowing them to trump biological reality. In the garden outside my window the birds are getting ready for spring no gender problems for them they know that they need to get on and raise as many young as possible this spring to ensure the survival of the species. Anyway a female sparrowhawk is 25% bigger than a male sparrowhawk, if a male sparrowhawk eat so much as… Read more »

Annie
4 years ago
Reply to  Steve-Devon

Never mind outer space. Any sane observer from the past would find our society utterly disgusting. Funny how the wokies are so ready to condemn past attitudes, but never consider how past attitudes might reflect on them.

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago
Reply to  Annie

Blimey, just think how many idols would have been shattered if history was in reverse!

hilarynw
hilarynw
4 years ago

Please could someone explain the reason why I should have to continue to be tested when entering the UK because I am unvaccinated when someone who is ‘positive’ for covid in the UK doesn’t even need to isolate.

Of course I doubt anyone can as there is no logic in any of this. I hope that one day when the truth comes out that the unvaccinated might be given an apology for the way we’ve been treated – of course pigs might fly!

i am also livid that on the one hand Johnson says this is all over but they still propose to roll out a pointless and potentially harmful jab to the 5-11 year-olds. There is not a shred of evidence for the benefit of this and scope for plenty of damage.

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago
Reply to  hilarynw

Someone explain to me why Radcliffe f.c. were allowed crowds of 300 under covid guidance but Bury A.F.C. were only allowed 150 in the exact same stadium. Some things will never be adequately explained.

Annie
4 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

And Welsh stadiums didn’t allow any spectators at all. Toxic lot, the Welsh.

Julian
4 years ago
Reply to  hilarynw

Last little bit of privilege for the vaxxed, also “controlling the borders to keep out nasty foreign variants” plays well to the voters.

Emerald Fox
4 years ago
Reply to  hilarynw

“Please could someone explain the reason why I should have to continue to be tested when entering the UK because I am unvaccinated when someone who is ‘positive’ for covid in the UK doesn’t even need to isolate.”

Isn’t it obvious by now? Those who refuse the ‘vaccines’ must be punished. That’s all there is to it. Less money for Pfizer means less money in the backhanders the politicians receive.
All governments have now seen how little resistance there has been to their scam, and there’s no reason for them not to keep the scam going forever.

DoctorCOxford
DoctorCOxford
4 years ago

Yeah, no more masks on London transport (darn, lost my reason why I couldn’t travel to London). Now, when do museums s drop the ridiculous “buy your free ticket to schedule a time.” I mention that because its all the insidious ways Covid has changed the world that we won’t get a roll back on until just before the next pandemic.

Sigh.

Keep Ukraine free!

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago
Reply to  DoctorCOxford

Could Sadiq Khan actually have kept this mask nonsense? Just how divided is this “United” Kingdom?

Julian
4 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

As pointed out earlier, compliance was patchy and dropping, including among staff. I think Khan just saw a way to quietly withdraw to save himself humiliation. But yes, he certainly could have kept it, why not?

Julian
4 years ago
Reply to  DoctorCOxford

I’m still badgering ice rinks to drop their pre-book only, 1 hour slot for the same price as you used to get 2 hours before covid policies. Some have, some haven’t.

Mumbo Jumbo
4 years ago

Welcome to the Hugh show!

TheBasicMind
4 years ago

Sadiq Khan can see the extent of non compliance meant he had painted himself in a corner, and has taken the opportunity to reverse ferret, so on the balance of probabilities he probably has at least one more brain cell than Trudeau.

Julian
4 years ago
Reply to  TheBasicMind

Yes that was very surprising.

huxleypiggles
4 years ago

An excellent, well balanced and fully supported article from Archbishop Cranmer. I am sure Justin Welby will see fit to ban the likes of Bozo if the likely mayhem of the Online Harms Bill becomes fact. A denier of the gospels of Christ can hardly claim to have any right to step into a Christian Church after promoting a law intended to ban free speech, now can he?

Silke David
4 years ago

BHP Mining to sack non-injected workers.
Interesting. A few months ago a news report from an Australian MSM station made the rounds which reported on a town which was mainly pure bloods (shock, horror). It was a mining town.

TheJamFan
TheJamFan
4 years ago

Catching Covid was fine – isolation was the really scary part” – It is a bitter irony that, in a bid to preserve physical health, we have destroyed so many people’s mental health, writes Bryony Gordon in the Telegraph.

Bryony isn’t the sharpest tool in the Telegraph box, but I’m amazed that even she still thinks this was all designed to ‘preserve physical health’.

We don’t even need – for instance – to venture far down the ivermectin rabbit hole.

Telling people to take Vitamin D. a piece of uncontroversial, and free, advice – that would have constituted an attempt to ‘preserve physical health’.

But I don’t think I’ve heard Witty or Vallance or Johnson or any of his hapless press conference sidekicks suggest this, and I don’t think I’ve heard any of the paid shills, sorry reporters, at the press conferences ask why not.

Admittedly, I haven’t watched very many – perhaps they talk of little else.

TheJamFan
TheJamFan
4 years ago

“The Disinformation Campaign Against Ivermectin – JAMA’s ‘Diversion’” – Big Pharma influences high-impact journals to selectively publish (purportedly) negative studies about ivermectin while outright rejecting positive studies from publication, writes Pierre Kory. I know I’m preaching largely to the converted, and many will already be aware of this, but that Malaysian ivermectin study is an interesting case study in both the writing of academic papers and their reporting by the media. The first thing to say is that the medical staff gave the ivermectin late (it’s best prescribed within 24-48 hrs of symptoms, and the patients were prescribed it at up to seven days after symptoms first arose), and they gave it solus (when it’s best prescribed as part of a regime of various drugs and supplements). Thus, insofar as the study proved anything, it did so by deliberately not using ivermectin to its best advantage (it can’t have been inadvertent, if I know about timing and combination the doctors involved certainly do). Now, the conclusion is that ‘a 5-day course of oral ivermectin administered during the first week of illness [which is incorrect] did not reduce the risk of developing severe disease compared with standard of care alone’. Severe… Read more »

dopamineboy
dopamineboy
4 years ago

With Sadiq Khan scrapping masks on London transport, over here in Hawaii our governor lives in an alternative reality. Hawaii is the lone US state with indoor mask mandates. It’s curious why it’s Ok to not wear a mask on an enclosed subway train in London, but not in a store in Hawaii?