Stop Vaccinating Under-16s as the Risks Outweigh the Benefits, MPs and Scientists Tell Government
A group of 30 MPs, peers, doctors and scientists – including MPs Miriam Cates, Graham Stringer and Sir Desmond Swayne and scientists Professor Allyson Pollock, Professor David Livermore and Professor Anthony Brookes – have written again to the JCVI calling for the Covid vaccination programme in healthy under-16s to be paused pending further studies, arguing that the evidence the benefits outweigh the risks is lacking.
The group first wrote to the Government vaccine advisory committee in early January to raise their concerns and received a reply on January 20th from Professor Wei Shen Lim, COVID-19 Chair of the JCVI. He disputed the relevance of the recent study showing that myocarditis risk following vaccination in young males is higher than previously thought, and argued the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of Omicron as a milder and vaccine-evading variant are not necessarily decisive as further variants may emerge. He also stated that the JCVI’s advice regarding the primary course of vaccination did not predetermine its advice regarding further ‘booster’ doses – apparently not being concerned about logical coherence, in that recommending boosters when a primary course is not recommended would defy sense.
The authors found this response very inadequate and have now set out in a reply why the JCVI must take seriously the evidence on risk and lack of benefit for this age group. Their letter is published in full below, beneath the letter from Prof. Lim to which they are replying.
Response to Professor Wei Shen Lim
February 2022
Dear Professor Wei Shen Lim,
Thank you for your response to our letter of January 7th. We are concerned that you still appear to be supporting the COVID-19 vaccine rollout for healthy children, who are most unlikely to suffer any significant illness from the virus, without reassessing benefits and harms in light of new evidence.
The child vaccination programme seems to be ineffective in reducing infection and transmission and, among other as-yet-unknown possible adverse effects, is associated with a risk of myocarditis – a serious condition, known in other cases to have a significant impact on lifelong morbidity and mortality.
Regarding comments concerning variants
Risk-benefit analyses are usually considered in the present, as this is where the decision is made. What is known of Omicron is that it is highly contagious but clinically milder. Therefore, post-infection or natural immunity will be acquired far faster across the population, further reducing the clinical usefulness of the vaccines in preventing infection and transmission. Indeed, it is known from a number of studies (two examples here and here) that natural immunity appears to be more robust than vaccine-induced immunity. A high number, perhaps the majority, of U.K. children are likely to have had COVID-19, so are well protected by natural immunity, and this is a number that is likely to be increasing all the time. This again begs the question as to why the JCVI has not reassessed the benefit-to-risk ratio of the child vaccination programme in light of the Omicron variant. Present understanding of respiratory viruses tells us that subsequent variants are highly likely to be milder rather than more severe in their clinical manifestation. We have no reason to suspect that SARS-CoV-2 will defy this evolutionary principle. Children will also almost certainly have broader immunity against future variants from Omicron infection, compared to vaccine-induced immunity from current vaccines, which were developed to an earlier variant spike protein no longer in common circulation. When all that is now known is considered within the previous JCVI criteria, the benefit of the vaccine reduces further. The risks, however, remain unchanged or are increasing as new adverse events following vaccination are recognised.
Regarding comments concerning myocarditis
We refer here to data from Hong Kong and Israel. In Hong Kong, the myocarditis rate was one in 2,680 using the Comirnarty (Pfizer) vaccine (not Moderna) in male 12-17 year-olds.
In Israel, rates were one in 6,637 in 16-19 year-old males after the Pfizer vaccine.
This issue is therefore highly relevant to the U.K. situation, with mid-late teenage males at higher risk of myocarditis. Of note, a U.S. study indicated a high rate of gadolinium enhancement in mRNA vaccine-associated myocarditis, consistent with myocardial scarring and long-term damage.
The lower reporting rate in the U.K. may reflect the lack of a formal study of this age group, and the suggestion that a longer interval between first and second doses could reduce the risk is speculative. In view of the concerns raised in the original JCVI review, it is remarkable that a formal study, with serial troponin monitoring, as well as serial cardiac assessments, in post-vaccinated males in this age group, with an appropriate control group, is not yet available.
Myocarditis is only one of the now proven adverse effects of these vaccines. Does the JCVI not agree that when adding in the unknown long-term harms (especially relevant for the young, with many years of healthy life expectancy ahead of them) the risk of the vaccine now exceeds the risk of the virus for the majority of children?
Regarding primary course and boosters
The sole purpose of vaccinating children ‘not in a clinical risk group’ would appear to be to reduce community transmission. Current data from the U.K. Health Security Agency (HSA) and Public Health Scotland are highly inconsistent with reduced transmission through vaccination overall, with a trend of relative increase in the ratio of vaccinated infection versus unvaccinated infection over time. This trend, and data elsewhere showing rapidly waning vaccine efficacy against infection with the Omicron (and Delta) variants over time, raise a very strong probability that vaccine efficacy will follow a similar pattern in teenagers. The UKHSA trend over time has been consistent with waning efficacy in higher age groups, corresponding to the prior time of vaccination of those age groups. This would remove all theoretical benefits of vaccinating healthy children.
Conclusion
In view of the above, the concerns raised in the original letter have not been addressed. Further, we find it genuinely remarkable that, given the prior JCVI concerns, formal studies have not been put in place during the rollout in these age groups with acknowledged limited benefit and significant knowledge gaps regarding safety.
The further data on myocarditis, the clear evidence of far lower risk and high rate of mild infection with the Omicron variant, and the evidence of waning vaccine efficacy in older age groups must all push the risk-benefit ratio previously discussed by the JCVI strongly in the direction of further risk and lesser benefit to children. Does the JCVI agree that the benefit-to-risk ratio is now reduced further, compared to when it previously advised against recommending the mass vaccination of healthy 12-15 year-olds?
What is the urgency to vaccinate healthy children at this time? Pausing the current vaccine programme in children would allow time to undertake the necessary research which would resolve the difficulties affecting the current decision making. The JCVI is tasked with the responsibility of considering vaccine safety and efficacy and as such every effort should be made to assess both safety and efficacy of a new vaccine in the early stages of its deployment, especially for children and young people.
Yours sincerely,
Miriam Cates MP
Thomas Coke, the Earl of Leicester
Richard Drax MP
Baroness Foster of Oxton
Baroness Fox
Marcus Fysh MP
Paul Girvan MP
Chris Green MP
Mark Jenkinson MP
Pauline Latham MP
Karl McCartney MP
Lord Moonie
Baroness Morrissey
Greg Smith MP
Graham Stringer MP
Sir Desmond Swayne MP
Sammy Wilson MP
Dr David Bell, Public Health Physician, formerly working on infectious diseases for the WHO
Professor Anthony Brookes, Genomics and Health Data Scientist, University of Leicester
Professor Norman Fenton, Risk Information Management, Queen Mary University of London
Dr Iona Heath CBE, president of the Royal College of General Practitioners (2009 to 2012)
Professor Marilyn James, Health Economics, University of Nottingham
Dr John Lee, Retired Professor of Pathology
Professor David Livermore, Medical Microbiology, University of East Anglia
Dr Aseem Malhotra, Consultant Cardiologist
Professor David Paton, Industrial Economics, University of Nottingham
Professor Allyson Pollock, Clinical Professor of Public Health, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University
Dr Gerry Quinn, Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster
Dr Roland Salmon, MRCGP, FFPH, former Director of the Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre (Wales)
Professor Brent Taylor, Professor Emeritus of Community Child Health, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Bit late for this isn’t it?
Yes it is but if I remember correctly it’s the first time that serving MPs have questioned whether vaccination, albeit of a subset, is the right approach. If we’re to recover from this, we have to get to the point where questioning vaccines is a respectable position in the mainstream.
True but they could and should have opposed vaccines months ago on the basis of evidence for effects on adults.
Criticise the Malmedy massacre but not Auschwitz?
We shouldn’t need to question these things. That’s the MHRA and JCVI’s job. Unfortunately they appear to have abrogated their responsibilities for political reasons or financial gain (or both)
MHRA failed from Day One. There’s no overall mortality benefit demonstrated in the trial data. That’s all you needed. None of the jabs should have had their temporary authorization because none demonstrated they could counter the “emergency”.
It did not fail – it serves the Gates agenda.
MPs keeping their noses clean in the hope of career advancement?
This will be known in history as “the Rotten Parliamanet” from the useless ‘jobsworth’ Speaker down.
That’s the shocking truth of it.
The medical fraternity is going to hell in a handcart and taking our children with it.
Their integrity is completely shot.
No it isn’t. Every day letters are being sent out to kids who have turned 12. And, indeed, younger children, who are considered clinically vulnerable. My son is in the former category, my daughter the latter and, whilst we have the intellectual confidence to challenge the prejudiced advice being given, most parents blindly accept what the “experts” tell them like the obedient little sheep they are.
The push to jab children is to put it on the childhood recommended list of vaccines so that after the emergency use expires, pharmas continue to be free from liability.
In order to get it on that list, they have to give it to lots of children and claim they are essential for public health.
Destroy Childhood = Receive Knighthood.
Arise, Sir Whitless.
Destroy children -some will die because of this – how many and when is an unknown
It was known well before the outset of the U18s jab program (indeed LS carried these stats) that at least 1 in 24,000 were dying from the jab – with the caveat that this likely under-estimates the true figure by a factor of 10. Even using the lower figure, the government knew out of 10m vaxxed kids 400 were likely to die – as sure as shooting them – such is the nature of proven real world stats. Yet the order went out to jab, unopposed by compliant MPs, MSM, medics, teachers (etc) and even some of the self-avowed sceptical brigade. Of course this figure (as horrifying as it is) doesn’t include longer term mortality death, side effects or injuries brought about by the vaxx, as it was still being trialled, so the kids were simply deemed convenient Gatesian guinea pigs for these types of gene therapy. PS: It was also known that the impact of C19 on healthy kids with no co-morbidities was likely to be negligible by comparison – up to 100x more deaths from the vaxx than covid for those with no co-morbidities) as recent stats have affirmed. This solid info was already out and available in… Read more »
Excellent summary of the data. It must be stopped. There must be retribution
After Blair ( and now Whitty) no Knighthood has any value – time those with any morality handed them back!.
That’s the law in the USA.
Can somebody please clarify the law in the UK.
The legal immunity varies between countries.
The UK has the vaccine damage payments act 1979.
It isn’t linked to child vaccinations in the same way as in the US.
Bit young too, it should be healthy under 50s at the very least! (and probably healthy under 65s)
Hey, healthy anyone, please!
Even that is debatable. We have known from day 1 that any vaxx was only really necessary for the elderly and vulnerable. Now, with the many ‘break-through’ infections, the defence is always, in all countries, that the majority of break-throughs are in the elderly, in whom the vaxx does not elicit a strong enough response.
The majority of people admitted to hospital, pre- and post-vaxx, is still the elderly. If it does not keep the people who were the primary group that needed protection from getting ill and going to hospital, it is clear the poison is of little use to anyone and should be offered to people on a “it might help, it might not” basis. That there is still even one person on earth who believes that this sludge actually does anything of note is a sad tribute to the power of propaganda over reality.
“We have known from day 1 that any vaxx was only really necessary for the elderly and vulnerable”
We don’t know that at all. I am surprised at how many so-called ‘sceptics’ remain wholly gullible to this assumption.
Me too – what is so wrong with people that they cannot read and understand what they read?
Are you serious or just stupid? The jabs were allowed on an Emergency Use Only basis. They are experimental drugs. Are the words too complex for you? The only people who, very arguably, needed those drugs were the Emergency cases i.e. old people with co-morbidities. This was extremely well known unless you were hiding in the same fridge as Boris Johnson.
I think Rick’s point is that no one needs the vaxx as this was not a particularly lethal virus.
Maybe the word ‘necessary’ was what he tripped over, I don’t know.
There is a virus that caused somewhat greater damage than a bog-standard flu virus. The group most at risk was the elderly/vulnerable, the data from China from January 2020 on made this clear (their general approach and numbers may be off, the data on treatment and risk group was not). This was confirmed by data from Europe and the US.
There will always be people who want a prophylactic for such a virus, which by and large comes in the form of what is called a vaccine. Hence why I say any vaxx that came out should have been targeted at that group. Not that it should have been forced upon that group or any group, merely that it should have been available, with clear statements regarding lack of knowledge re effects, side effects in the short, mid and long term.
And with regard to the anti ’flu product, some retailers do not use the term “vaccine” for it. E.g. my regular supermarket has a pharmacy counter in it, and it always has posters advertising “Flu jabs, book an appointment here”.
Totally agree, Rick. I am 77 & have a rare chronic autoimmune illness that includes lung disease. My medication suppresses my immune system.
I can find no reassurance anywhere that it is safe for me to have these injections, even my consultants have tried to persuade me.
I confess to having had the first two to enable me to visit my daughter & family in France( which I didn’t after all) but I have not had the third one in October or the ‘booster’ in January.
Four ‘jabs’ in less than a year????
Hang on, if we’re being pedantic, “any vaxx” doesn’t imply that any of them actually work, nor does “necessary” mean “sufficient”, and “only” is intended to convey that it was not necessary for anyone else.
On the “necessity”, there were excess deaths from the early variants, and those were almost all in the elderly (or grossly obese, vitamin deficient, or with comorbidities).
Great Barrington was slightly optimistic about how quickly SARS-COV-2 would mutate into harmlessness. Not as wrong as SAGE has been over and over and over again, mind, but up until the early 2021 wave fizzled out (everywhere, with or without clot shots) there was an argument to be made in favour of pre-infection treatments.
I doubt that anybody here is still supporting that view now.
I do agree. I have always thought that jabbing the most clinically vulnerable groups could be justified. But it should have stopped there.
Agreed, RickH. And, they’re only called “vaccines” because they changed the bl**dy definition of the word.
Way too late – at least 10 months, being charitable, probably more. Another bunch of self serving elites and experts attempting to to remain on the right side of history by a mixture of fence sitting and subservience. The true impact of vaxx injuries was beyond doubt by March 2021, thanks in no small part to the efforts of UKC in doing what MHRA refused to do – that is make the Yellow Card data accessible and (crucially) interrogable. TCW ran an article in March 2021 breaking down the C19 risk in all age groups from C19 death – while pointing out that even Prof. Tim Spector had previously cast doubt on the benefit of vaxxing anyone under 60. Along with a handful of others I posted regularly in LS at this time pointing out this with links to other mounting evidence, while spelling out the clear and present vaxx risk to kids meant the roll out should be stopped before it started. Of course such criticism came up against the two planks of LS editorial policy at the time: 1) Do not criticise the PM, as he is an all round good egg and TY’s personal chum. Any criticism of this policy… Read more »
100%+
^^^^ Yes. The signs that these “vaccines” would be dangerous existed already in early 2020, but by Feb/March 21 it was completely clear. And it is horrifying that so many supposedly intelligent, educated professionals have so docilely gone along with the programme. 🙁
Even more obviously – it was clear from the start that no medication could be declared ‘safe’ within acceptable limits with this lack of testing. By definition
If you need more proof of the risks just look at this :-
https://www.authorea.com/users/455597/articles/552937-innate-immune-suppression-by-sars-cov-2-mrna-vaccinations-the-role-of-g-quadruplexes-exosomes-and-micrornas
Please publicise this. Can anyone send it to our dim M.P.’s?
Basically it proves that the jabs denigrate the immune system which in turn leads to a proliferation of autoimmune diseases in the future.
That you would even contemplate jabbing anyone, let alone kids, with this stuff is beyond my comprehension.
There are similar articles.
Look for them and send to everyone of influence.
This is listed in today’s News Roundup. Yes, it’s very good. Very very long and extremely dense … and extremely alarming.
TRULY. This paper is the bomb. Read it.
Why is HIV suddenly back in the news?
Because that is what their “vaccines” are now generating in the human body! The more spike proteins they get in you, the worse it gets!
( Fauci was in on the 80s AIDS crisis from day one devising his “strategies”)
Guess what’s next (and developed already)
MSM says Aids is making a comeback stoke up the fear again, so, what better way to stop it?
Yep, a new mrna HIV “vaccine”.
Guaranteed to cure you of the very “disease” which the covid mrna jab gave you in the first place !
Pure Genius.
And the sheep will be ever so grateful to our wonderful scientists again.
In any sane world everyone would realise that it ain’t AIDS – it’s VAIDS (clue, the first word is vaccine…)
Copyright Luc Montagnier
R.I.P.
Nope, the first word is ‘vaxx’ (ie misrepresented gene therapy), which was never regarded as a ‘vaccine’ until Gates/WHO changed the definition in 2020 (adopted later by CDC et al).
And this is why these novel therapeutics:
The TRUTH about the Freedom Convoy: RUPA SUBRAMANYA spoke to close to 100 protesters. She didn’t find a single insurrectionist, white supremacist, racist or misogynist. She did find a diverse group of decent people, who’ve had enough
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10500037/RUPA-SUBRAMANYA-spoke-protesters-smeared-Canadas-Trudeau-didnt-single-racist.html#comments
By RUPA SUBRAMANYA FOR DAILYMAIL.COM
Don’t get complacent. Let’s keep getting the message out with our friendly resistance
Saturday 12th February 2pm to 4pm
Yellow Boards LONDON
111 Buckingham Palace Road
(Outside Daily Telegraph’s Office & Victoria Station)
London SW1W 0DT
Stand in the Park Sundays 10am make friends, ignore the madness & keep sane
Wokingham Howard Palmer Gardens Cockpit Path car park Sturges Rd RG40 2HD
Henley Mills Meadows (at the bandstand) Henley-on-Thames RG9 1DS
Telegram Group
http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell
It’s great that this is being raised but how will the Government react? They will have to “follow the science”: what will Prof
MengeleWitty tell them to do?30 scientists and MPs aren’t going to achieve much. Maybe it gets a ball rolling. Probably not, but they have to try.
The Government makes up it’s own science and then follows it…
after modelling the stats it want into existence however mathematically invalid.
Professor Wei Shen Lim co-authored “Preparing for the next Flu Pandemic” in February 2007. No mention of the word ‘vaccine’.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1796676/
Why was there a need to ‘prepare for the next ‘flu pandemic’ in 2007? The last genuine ‘pandemic’ was 2018 and I have seen quite a few articles calling the origins of this into doubt and suggesting it was deliberately introduced.
Lord Bill of the Gates of Hell is constantly foretelling of the “next pandemic” but why should there be one, certainly in developed nations?
We are being primed to believe that “pandemics” are practically annual events when in fact the opposite is the truth.
The Davos Deviants wouldn’t be running a Pandemic Programme would they with each operation having a Kill target? A convenient mixture of deaths by disease topped up with an ever increasing number of deaths by lethal injections; whoops, I meant deaths by “vaccines.”
Surely not!
Absolutely. The same thing happening in NL. They plan to let go of most of the restrictions in the next few weeks – except the filthy apartheid app. That was their original plan in November, fortunately the vaxx failed so spectacularly at that time. They know ‘infections’ will go down in the next 2 weeks, will open up using the app and claim victory due to the app. Yesterday parliament made the cabinet withdraw the legislation to introduce 2g, a small victory. But it still wants to introduce it in the future, it still wants to keep the apartheid app as such. Initially it was claimed for future ‘variants’, this week the health min. said we might need it for some virus in the future.
We get told that all the lockdown mistakes were due to this being a once-in-a-century pandemic, but now are expected to prepare for them happening every other week?
Apologies: 1918 NOT 20018.
Mixing your centuries, now you’re showing your age, Aldous 😉
Not checking after posting.
In 1918 many doctors were brewing their own vaccines and trialling them, especially in the US Army. Huge population of their very own human lab rats to experiment on. The level of knowledge at the time meant they couldn’t even guess at inadvertent cross species infections. If you inject a home brew into 10000 troops on a camp, living in fairly squalid conditions, I guess you have a high likelihood of generating new variants of goodness knows what.
As Robert Kennedy Jr. has pointed out, giving covid jabs to children does reduce risk… to the pharmaceutical companies.
At the moment they are free from liability for damages because of the emergency authorisation use. However, once the emergency use expires and they are given as fully licenced, pharmas are liable.
EXCEPT if they become a childhood recommended vaccine. In which case, they aren’t liable for any damages.
The push to jab children is nothing more than an effort by pharma companies to make sure they are never liable for damages from covid jabs.
Dont let millions of vax related death and injuries get in the way. The elite have many more experimental meds to sell. How three weeks to ‘flatten the curve’ can lead to ‘get your mandatory HIV injections’.
Some time ago censored scientists were warning that the injections were destroying natural immunity leading to a rise cases of AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency)
Later other mainstream outlets began running the story…
Then the EMA went on record….
Now the elite are unging people to get tested for HIV. Are they planning to blame VAIDS (Vaccine Acquired Immune Deficiency) on a new HIV ‘pandemic’?
Guess what, they already have new HIV injections in the pipeline – almost like they knew what was coming…
“We could be getting even closer to stopping the spread of HIV / AIDS.”
Could somebody with a more medical mind explain where “the spread of aids” is coming from? I didn’t know AIDS was spreading.
I know of only one person in my lifetime who was diagnosed with AIDS and that was over twenty years ago. Since when has AIDS become a feature of daily life?
More BS and fear propoganda. Except for the triple perforated with their crushed immune systems.
They would appear to have been sowing the seeds for this for some time.
I watch the soaps, there’s an English one I follow – I’m some months behind and watched a recorded episode from end November this week. A middle-aged character is going on a date with another middle-aged character, his son hands him a condom – “just in case” – and says he needs to think of things like catching Aids. That stood out – why not just say STIs or the clap? Why specifically Aids? That was a theme in the 90s, not now. This was 3 months ago.
Because I’ve been running behind on watching it for over a year, I’ve noticed more than once that the programme deals with issues that 2 or 3 months later became a news item (e.g. the BLM stuff was being raised on the show months before things kicked off summer 2020).
Predictive programming in action?
Ahh, very good point.
And then Montagnier died.
pretty sure no lynch mob in history has been swayed by a contractual get out.
The gov could have made all jabbings voluntary and optional from day one to avoid any conflict of interests.
Instead they pushed them, propagandised, and coerced, and are solely to blame for all deaths and injuries.
Luckily for them, reality is infinitely malleable so they can get away with anything.
IN THIS LIFE.
The Matt Letiseur (retired footballer) campaigner would be looking at again me thinks.
Please clarify
Children have knowingly been sacrificed to protect adults. Fact (unless you’re a fact-checker of course). It’s about as low as the human race can go. Nobody says it because most are complicit – MSM in particular. I’m genuinely ashamed to be part of this species.
And have they really protected a single adult?
How can anyone prove it?
By keeping a control group and seeing the difference between the jabbed and the unjabbed control group.
But of course, if they force everyone to get jabbed, then there is no control group.
Very convenient.
Methinks us awkward bugggers are the control group
Remember unmasked
Unjabbed
Unafraid
They are not being sacrificed to ‘protect adults’. The injections have zero efficacy. They are being sacrificed to further the long term aims of the elite.
^^^^^^^^
I do not subscribe to the view that children are being “sacrificed” to protect adults and I doubt many adults would accept this view.
Some parents may be going along with injecting their children but my understanding is that this is based on the erroneous notion, promoted by MSM, that the ‘virus’ is now coming for their children. Two years after it was released.
A bit late, but still very welcome. And, to be fair, they needed the evidence from Israel, HK and USA to make their case.
The JCVI is a disgrace for not adopting the precautionary principle to gene therapies being used on young adults and children when there is no medium to long term safety data. They should be held accountable for any deaths and disabilities which have occurred.
the urgency for this has only ever been manufactured. Nobody needed or needs this experimental drug – there have always been safer and cheaper treatments for this mllder than flu virus- ‘the ‘pandemic’ has as much to do with health as Watergate had to do with a hotel’ to quote Reiner Fuellmich. Murder is murder and people should be held to account now.
“Murder is murder.”
Exactly. Let’s stop pussy footing about and call the injection programme what it is – a preplanned, orchestrated Murder campaign.
It’s been said more than once that repeated mRNA injections are dangerous for people. Even the EMA said a 4th shot should not be administered.
Now mRNA vaxxes are being developed for flu, for HIV and so on. But surely the toxicity of the jab lies in the immune-system evading/deregulating mRNA technology itself and not in the specific genetic payload inside the LNP? If this is correct, then anyone who has already had 2 or 3 doses of the covid poison surely would be at risk if having *any* other mRNA shots, whatever the disease it is aimed at?
Yes, you’re right, the dangers reside in both the spike protein which is inflammatory and damaging on its own, and in the immune-system evading/dodging camouflage/disabling mechanisms that carry the spike/other antigenic-protein-instructions/mRNA. In fact I read somewhere that taking many or frequent doses of this kind of treatment, when it was a newly proposed treatment for cancer, would be a bad idea.
The problem for the JCVI & other public bodies is that they can’t find a way to step back from hasty/corrupt decisions. They are hoisted by their own petard.
You mean we are.
The use of these “vaccines” now appears to be doctrinal, political and financial, rather than medical.
It is a disgrace that large sections of the medical profession seem to have swallowed the PR for vaccinating children, and one wonders if they have the slightest interest in educating themselves by reference to the peer-reviewed, wholly valid research, statistics and other data that highlight the dangers.
The Government has “gone nap” on the Pfizer stuff, in particular, and no doubt has signed up to dodgy deals committing the UK taxpayer to shelling out for their product for all time. It also doesn’t help that all the lying and fear-mongering has led to a widespread “I will obey” attitude.
This is just the sort of article to be reported in DT. With a little anti Chinese slant thrown in somewhere. Just cause I appreciate that sort of thing.
The covid narrative is failing but how could we have in independent inquiry when Parliament and institutions are all complicit.
The justification for jabbing the under 16’s is the possibility of future variants with unspecified properties that they may need protection from, via a vaccine that is inferior to natural immunity on the current mild variant and with no idea if it will work on the unspecified future variant?
Is that about right?
Nah: it’s the money, innit!
Combined with getting rid of any control group.
Exactly. B******t in other words.
Anyone who’d read the relevant literature knew the mRNA vaccines were inappropriate before they were rolled out, what little we saw of the trial data showed they were ineffective (>1% effective in absolute terms).
New data since rollout shows the vaccines have serious short term side effects, frightening longer term potential consiquences, not to mention the unknown unknowns.
This is a collossal failure of science, and a collossal failure of Governments globally.
Stop all transfections in all humans now.
Yes – though I would say it is a colossal failure of ‘science’!
or a magnificent success of $cience
It is truly extraordinary that there have been zero official matched cohort studies into the effectiveness and side-effects of the vaccines. When you’re talking about a huge rollout it isn’t that difficult.
Instead they’re relying on test-negative case-control for measures of vaccine effectiveness, which is the ‘cheap’ way of doing this and the use of which is specifically cautioned against for vaccines similar in characteristic to the covid vaccines (leaky, suggestions of viral interference, no controls on testing).
And they’re relying on Yellow-Card for measures of side-effect rates — a ‘last resort’ system that shouldn’t be necessary in these days of ‘big data’ (ie, why not just correlate all hospital visits by vaccine status and see what information comes).
What is necessary are formal studies — the only reason for not doing them is because you’d prefer not to risk finding out anything bad; if you don’t find the ‘bad things’ then you can just claim ‘but nobody knew‘ (aka plausible deniability) when eventually the problems become too obvious to ignore.
When you say they are using the Yellow Card system, you obviously don’t mean the government or the health authorities, right?
Yes indeed, everything you say is true except for “it’s truly extraordinary” in the context of this scamdemic and politicians generally since the beginning of time. It’s entirely consistent with everything else they’ve done with covid – evil dishonesty.
Big pharma never have, don’t and will never have to do any tests/trials etc. which may show vaccines are harmful. (or if they have, they will never release them.)
The official/governmental reasoning for this is a stroke of genius :-
1.The announcement of any such trial would in itself cause the public to lose confidence in the very concept of vaccination.
2.Any adverse effects, no matter how insignificant, would only serve the interests of Lawyers interested in pursuing claims for damages.
Don’t think for a minute that bigpharma is scared of having to pay damages.
They are not.
The only thing that frightens them is the fact that during litigation the Lawyers would be able to force them to disclose ALL their internal data relating to development, safety concerns, memos. etc. Criminal proceedings may flow therefrom.
This information they will never willingly disclose.
They have learnt well from previous scandals :-
Bextra – good old Pfizer.
Vioxx – Merck (500,00 deaths anyone?)
Just remember how long it took to nail big tobacco.
The damage caused by smoking by and large takes longer to manifest itself.
The myocarditis, pericarditis, neurological damage, heart disease and strokes related to the vaxx are coming a little too fast and furious for them to cover this up for as long as big tobacco did. Particularly as the time line is so clear as to when the damage started.
Plausible deniability has been baked in from the start.
For those who already got it….
https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/resources/spike-protein-detox-guide/
It is a crime. It is actually several crimes. However, we may have to accept that this is required to ensure everyone can be successfully tagged and monitored, via a digital surveillance system.
I also accept that in thirty years or so, when the UK private healthcare systems, including BGHS (that’s Bill Gates Health Service) are overwhelmed with heart failures, that my kids are going to be living on a pacific island somewhere, far away from safety drones and freedom passes, perfectly healthy and enjoying a “new normal”.
I’ll let you know the co-ordinates of the island so your kids can can join in the freedom fun.
I name this island “THE SENSECHELLES”.
Caption competition
‘Mum, look me in the eyes and tell me you are not trying to kill me’
😑… I’ve just listened to Mike Yeadons submission to the Corona committee again on the subject of “bad batches”, the link is on UK column website if anyone’s interested, or for those that haven’t seen it…stunning! “Stop vaccinating under sixteens”… The evidence or the suggestion, that these untested, never used before, mutogenic cytotoxins, could be potentially lethal, has been freely available to all who cared to look since before Dec 2020, but still many millions of parents across the globe have been complicit in delivering a potential death sentence, or at the very least, a life limiting medical intervention too their beloved progeny! In the words of Paige and Plant, Dazed and Confused dosn’t quite cut it!
Grim revelations on Spotify’s conflicts of interest and why it is being so hostile to Joe Rogan and now to Maajid Nawaz …
https://twitter.com/MaajidNawaz/status/1491822957806735366
The one positive benefit that will come out of the last two years of terrorising the population is that more people are waking up to the charlatan snake-oil salesmen in the pharmaceutical industry.
More and more evidence is coming to light that vaccines are the greatest con trick of all time. At best, they do nothing, at worst they cause life limiting illness and death. Everyone has to let go of the religious fervour of the jabberists.
All the money spaffed on corona, essentially a bad cold. It makes you weep, for that amount of money no one with actual medical needs should be waiting for treatment.
The key question is, how many people are waking up? Enough?
it’s also leading to an even more polarised society.
For example, two years ago, for most of us, anti-vax was a pretty non-threatening concept, relating to people who had some slightly quirky ideas about vaccines.
Two years on if you are like me, you have become incredibly sceptical of vaccinations and certainly don’t see the term anti-vax as any kind of insult.
If you are someone who continues to wear a mask despite no requirement to do so, then you’re probably in the camp who consider an “anti-vaxxer” almost in the same category as a terrorist.
I became incredibly sceptical of vaccines about 20 years ago, after a lot of reading and applying some critical thought. Young Eagles have never been jabbed with anything. The infant schedule nowadays is frightening. Every other kid in the classroom has some sort of allergy, digestive issue or behavioural issue, and yet no-one ever wonders what is causing it.
We are supposed to believe that prophylactic jabs are some sort of Harry Potter wonder potion, 100 percent effective and no adverse or unexpected side effects. This cannot possibly be true, nothing else in medicine pretends to have these impossible properties.
Ditto ref my son; no vaxx.
The current NHS schedule of child vaccinations is for 15 diseases (multiple jabs for each).
6 of those are have been introduced since 2006 alone. 6!
What terrible diseases have been circulating in the last 20 years that have required 6 new children’s inoculations?
The answer of course is none.
And with the 16th jab about to be added to the list (the COVID jab) we have all the confirmation we need that the child vaccination schedule isn’t designed for the protection of children, but for the profit of pharmaceutical companies.
Check out the data on Sudden infant death. SIDS.
It has diminished as infant vaxxines were missed due to the pandemic. The graph of the drop in deaths matches the curve of the missed vaxxes.
Highwire did an article on this.
Exactly why we didn’t jab our infants. I rather suspect that the resulting inflammation and microclotting from either adjuvants or some other part of the magic potions are responsible for the diverse range of damages found in a high proportion of children nowadays. Where the damage was in the brain stem, SIDS.
The destruction to reputation which the medical and pharmaceutical industries will now suffer will be immense. As injection deaths become more and more obvious public anger will grow.
Armed guards on GP surgeries and hospitals? Maybe that’s too much of a stretch even for a conspiracy theorist. We’ll see.
A backlash is inevitable.
The “vaccine” passports/passes/mandates may have been a classical over-reach.
Millions have been pressured to be injected against their will, or under false promises.
That was always dangerous.
Not our MP, that useless husk.
The only article we should all be reading today is Dr McCullough’s paper to be found in the Daily Roundup (with Moira Stewart)?
https://www.authorea.com/users/455597/articles/552937-innate-immune-suppression-by-sars-cov-2-mrna-vaccinations-the-role-of-g-quadruplexes-exosomes-and-micrornas
No reason to doubt the general thrust of this. Vaccines are destroying immunity, and our natural defences against cancers. Hence the desperation to create an HIV scare. When a global jab initiative wrecks your interferon mechanisms and God knows what else, who you gonna blame?
And yet who doesn’t know large numbers of people this year who have suddenly been diagnosed with aggressive cancers, and weird neurological problems, let alone the heart issues.
The foolish agenda monkeys are attempting to hop into the lifeboats dressed in crinolines and unconvincing wigs. We are approaching the beginning of the end, and it’s going to get ugly.
New HIV/AIDS is vaccine damage, coming to a town very near you. Where is Whitty?
This is now becoming totally outrageous – our silent, sold-out Media are guilty of huge Crimes Against Humanity by their silence.
They watch in deliberate silence and total knowledge as AIDS is being delivered to the entire population – it is beyond evil!
Three in my family.
They always use the picture of that child getting a jab for the under 16s. I find it harrowing, a young kid sat there masked up placing total trust in something that is fundamentally stupid and harmful
I find deeply disturbing – these are perfectly healthy children with growing bodies and strong immune systems being injected with what could contribute to their early death. It reminds me of images from WW2 Camps.
I cannot understand why there is not public outrage!
I’ve been emailing my MP Paul Girvan about this. His name is in the list of signatories. Hats off to him and his colleagues.
..
Another day, another senior Pfizer whistleblower …
This was tweeted by Maajid Nawaz, who was sacked by LBC for telling the truth so all those who can afford should support his journalism
https://paine.tv/exclusive-pfizer-vax-trial-manager-tells-all-blows-whistle-on-data-brook-jacksons-shocking-revelations-during-her-first-sit-down/
It’s spectacularly fraudulent.
What’s the point of writing to the JCVI? They said “NO” last time and Whitless just overrode them with the most pathetic excuse of the non-pandemic. The real way to tell them “NO!!!” is to write to your MP and say “I am never voting for your party again and nor am I voting for any party currently in Parliament”.