Deaths 9% Below Average – When Will The Government Declare the Pandemic Over?
Deaths in the most recent week for which data are available were 9.3% below the five-year average in England and Wales, prompting questions of why in such a mild winter the Government is being slow to join countries like Denmark in reclassifying COVID-19, repealing pandemic laws and lifting the state of emergency.
Figures from the ONS released today show that in the week ending January 28th 2022, there were 1,269 fewer deaths registered in England and Wales compared to the five-year average, which is 9.3% lower. This figure uses data from 2016-19 and 2021 as the five-year average, missing out 2020 as a pandemic year. However, deaths in January 2021 were very high, so this skews the five-year average upwards. Nonetheless, compared with the 2015 to 2019 five-year average, deaths in England and Wales were still 2.8% below average (359 fewer deaths).
The figures also show that almost a third of Covid deaths in the most recent week did not have COVID-19 recorded as underlying cause on the death certificate. Of the 1,385 deaths involving COVID-19, 71.2% (986 deaths) had Covid recorded as the underlying cause of death (compared with 72.9% in the previous week). This means 28.8% of deaths officially counted as Covid deaths were registered as from another underlying cause.
Reflecting the low mortality, excess deaths in hospitals and care homes were running well below average, at 17.9% and 20.1% below respectively. However, deaths in private homes continue to run high, being 17.8% (557 deaths) above the five-year average. While some of this may be displacement from hospitals and care homes, with people continuing to avoid them, the full circumstances around this ongoing issue need to be properly investigated.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Tyrants aren’t likely to rush to declare tyranny over, are they?
Ceausecu never had the chance to dismiss himself!
Happy days….
Because the ‘pandemic’ is the ‘War with Eastasia’.
They haven’t triple jabbed everyone yet.
3 is sooo 2021
Get 5 jabs and you get a free pizza.
More likely a coffin.
It never really started.
Got to protect the pandemic from the people now!
Indeed – see this excellent letter submitted to the government by 130 UK medical professionals – submitted as a BTL comment by “Ug” below the TCW Article by Kate Dunlop They think it’s all over – not by a long chalk – The Conservative Woman (The article itself is excellent and a warning to all of us) “Dear Sirs and Madam, Our grave concerns about the handling of the COVID pandemic by Governments of the Nations of the UK. We write as concerned doctors, nurses, and other allied healthcare professionals with no vested interest in doing so. To the contrary, we face personal risk in relation to our employment for doing so and / or the risk of being personally “smeared” by those who inevitably will not like us speaking out. We are taking the step of writing this public letter because it has become apparent to us that: • The Government (by which we mean the UK government and three devolved governments/administrations and associated government advisors and agencies such as the CMOs, CSA, SAGE, MHRA, JCVI, Public Health services, Ofcom etc, hereinafter “you” or the “Government”) have based the handling of the COVID pandemic on flawed assumptions. • These… Read more »
3. The exaggerated nature of the threat Policy appears to have been directed at systematic exaggeration of the number of deaths which can be attributed to COVID. Testing was designed to find every possible ‘case’ rather than focusing on clinically diagnosed infections and the resulting exaggerated case numbers fed through to the death data with large numbers of people dying ‘with COVID’ and not ‘of COVID’ where the disease was the underlying cause of death. The policy of publishing a daily death figure meant the figure was based entirely on the PCR test result with no input from treating clinicians. By including all deaths within a time period after a positive test, incidental deaths, with but not due to COVID, were not excluded thereby exaggerating the nature of the threat. Moreover, in headlines reporting the number of deaths, a categorisation by age was not included. The average age of a COVID-labelled death is 81 for men and 84 for women, higher than the average life expectancy when these people were born. This is a highly relevant fact in assessing the societal impact of the pandemic. Death in old age is a natural phenomenon. It cannot be said that a disease… Read more »
5. Inappropriate and unethical use of behavioural science to generate unwarranted fear Propagation of a deliberate fear narrative (confirmed through publicly accessible government documentation) has been disproportionate, harmful and counterproductive. We request that it should cease forthwith. To give just one example, the government’s face covering policies seem to have been driven by behavioural psychology advice in relation to generating a level of fear necessary for compliance with other policies. Those policies do not appear to have been driven by reason of infection control, because there is no robust evidence showing that wearing a face covering (particularly cloth or standard surgical masks) is effective against transmission of airborne respiratory pathogens such as SARS-Cov-2. Several high profile institutions and individuals are aware of this and have advocated against face coverings during this pandemic only inexplicably to reverse their advice on the basis of no scientific justification of which we are aware. On the other hand there is plenty of evidence suggesting that mask wearing can cause multiple harms, both physical and mental. This has been particularly distressing for the nation’s school children who have been encouraged by government policy and their schools to wear masks for long periods at school. Finally,… Read more »
7. Misunderstanding of asymptomatic spread and its use to promote public compliance with restrictions It is well-established that asymptomatic spread has never been a major driver of a respiratory disease pandemic and we object to your constant messaging implying this, which should cease forthwith. Never before have we perverted the centuries-old practice of isolating the ill by instead isolating the healthy. Repeated mandates to healthy, asymptomatic people to self-isolate, especially school children, serves no useful purpose and has only contributed to the widespread harms of such policies. In the vast majority of cases healthy people are healthy and cannot transmit the virus and only sick people with symptoms should be isolated. The government’s claim that one in three people could have the virus has been shown to be mutually inconsistent with the ONS data on prevalence of disease in society, and the sole effect of this messaging appears to have been to generate fear and promote compliance with government restrictions. The government’s messaging to ‘act as if you have the virus’ has also been unnecessarily fear-inducing given that healthy people are extremely unlikely to transmit the virus to others. The PCR test, widely used to determine the existence of ‘cases’,… Read more »
9. Vaccination of the entire adult population should never have been a prerequisite for ending restrictions Based merely on early “promising” vaccine data, it is clear that the Government decided in summer 2020 to pursue a policy of viral suppression within the entire population until vaccination was available (which was initially stated to be for the vulnerable only, then later changed — without proper debate or rigorous analysis — to the entire adult population). This decision was taken despite massive harms consequent to continued lockdowns which were either known to you or ought to have been ascertained so as to be considered in the decision making process. Moreover, a number of principles of good medical practice and previously unimpeachable ethical standards have been breached in relation to the vaccination campaign, meaning that in most cases, whether the consent obtained can be truly regarded as “fully informed” must be in serious doubt: • The use of coercion supported by an unprecedented media campaign to persuade the public to be vaccinated, including threats of discrimination, either supported by the law or encouraged socially, for example in co-operation with social media platforms and dating apps. • The omission of information permitting individuals to… Read more »
Conclusions The UK’s approach to COVID has palpably failed. In the apparent desire to protect one vulnerable group — the elderly — the implemented policies have caused widespread collateral and disproportionate harm to many other vulnerable groups, especially children. Moreover your policies have failed in any event to prevent the UK from notching up one of the highest reported death rates from COVID in the world. Now, despite very high vaccination rates and the currently very low COVID death and hospitalisation rates, policy continues to be aimed at maintaining a population handicapped by extreme fear with restrictions on everyday life prolonging and deepening the policy-derived harms. To give just one example, NHS waiting lists now stand at 5.1m officially, with — according to the previous Health Secretary — a likely further 7m who will require treatment not yet presented. This is unacceptable and must be addressed urgently. In short, there needs to be a sea change within the Government which must now pay proper attention to those esteemed experts outside its inner circle who are sounding these alarms. As those involved with healthcare, we are committed to our oath to “first do no harm”, and we can no longer stand… Read more »
Apologies this was so long – but It was good so I thought people might be interested – doubt it will achieve anything as the govt is so clearly uninterested in the views of “scientists” other than those they have a vested interest in following, but good to know that further down the line it cannot be said they were not made aware.
Thank you for posting this in its entirety. This is one of the best summaries I have seen that itemizes all the ways the Covid narrative was bogus or dubious.
The letter makes several original points. For example, I appreciate the authors mentioning how the average age of a COVID victim (81 for males and 84 for females) was almost never mentioned in press reports. This had to be intentional. In America, I once did a COVID article and tried to find the average age of a COVID victim. I couldn’t find this data . The public was led to believe that everyone was almost equally at risk when, in fact, only those over 70 or with severe pre-existing conditions faced elevated risks. Well done!
Early on Ivor Cummins did a super job identifying the vulnerable and putting all the numbers in context.
No apologies needed.
So many people have behaved so admirably and courageously, under great pressure and often terrible distress.
I wish I wasn’t so disappointed in the others. How will we ever trust them again?
Great letter. One comment:
The authors insist this must never again happen. But it’s happening still! Until it’s really over, and the perpetrators identified and punished, it is premature to declare it must never happen again. All efforts should be aimed at ending it now.
And the same fear tactics and control strategies will be mutated onto the ‘climate emergency’ as the Graun newspaper puts it.
The absence of the consideration of the harms was not “willfull avoidance.”
It was willful harm.
How can they declare something that never started as “over”?
It started because a state of pandemic was declared by the WHO. That’s something abstract which isn’t directly related to any real-world events.
I assume that once the pathetic pandemic is officially classed as over the enquiries will begin and it will become incredibly clear just how much has been stolen by the Tories and their mates in the name of fighting this trumped up virus.
I wouldn’t hold your breath
The Iraq war enquiry didn’t amount to much, Blair is not behind bars and he’s listened to. Seems unlikely that the real truth will emerge from the covid scam/madness for a few generations yet given that almost every powerful institution on the planet is in it up to their necks. I think a lot of the main protagonists will need to die of natural causes or retire from public life at a ripe old age before we’ll get anything like a balanced assessment.
Governments of all political stripes (at least nominally) have to a greater or lesser degree participated in this shitshow.
Good point. This isn’t the first time that “trusted government officials” have lied about data or spread obvious “Misinformation” to produce an intended government action – actions or policies that resulted in the deaths of untold thousands of innocent people and untold levels of misery.
I mean, they’ve lied to the people before (and gotten away with it). What makes so many people think they are not lying now?
Wait until they steal your Bank Account- that’s next!
Enquiries along those lines might be useful in the longer term, but they can always suspend them on one pretext or another – like the Grenfell tower one that is still suspended (presumably because of the pandemic).
Nothing to do with seasonal flu, DNR orders etc. WEF agents want to accelerate crashing the financial system while they’re still in power.
I believe this year will be worse economically than the previous 2 years of covid combined. Hope I’m wrong.
2022 is clearly a premature forcast IMO.
World Bank has 2025 down for ending the covid “crisis”
EU’s Christine Lagarde said 2025 for the EU CBDC rollout
China & Russia have CBDC ready, UK is still in white paper mode, but expected 2025, US Fed only just published it’s “discussion paper”.
2030 – WEF’s goal
Expect more consolidation for WEF big business/tech between now and then. A “supply crisis” is clearly on the cards. Pandemic 2.0 odds are shrinking by the day given the global overplaying of hands, it seems a busted flush at this point. But there’s loads of other hands to play, energy crunch, war, terrorism is so passe post covid but depends how the politics go, food supply issues seems to have an engineered element, so could be likely too. I think “Financial Armageddon” is the trump card to swing it, but there’s UBI and social credit system ducks to line up first.
we’ll definately be squeezed between now and 2025, but the real hard times will come leading up to 2030 IMO.
Great observations.
I’ve noticed a plethora of new plant-based food companies emerging in the last 18 months when everything else ground to a halt. Well packaged, generously backed and already in cafe chains and supermarkets.
Lots of associated propaganda about how much carbon and energy it takes to make a cheeseburger etc. Plus rumblings from the medical fraternity about the dangers of meat, with a nice tie in with premature heart attacks.
I’m fully expecting an engineered food crisis soon. The same clown who modelled covidmania triggered the foot and mouth thing, so easy to do.
The question is at what point do we all say enough is enough? When do we demand the traditional British right to simply be left in peace?
if you wanted to stunt brain growth you’d prevent people getting enough protein.
If you wanted testosterone free zombie soi-bois you’d make sure people got a lot of meat subsititutes.
I do believe that is a valid observation. Starting with the demonization of meat as unhealthy, backed up with the feel-good rationalization for the fanatics – you are saving the planet.
Recently saw tins of plant-based tuna in a local supermarket, i’d rather eat cat food, which soon too will likely be plant-based….if we’re lucky.
ice.age.farmer – DARPA is funding the creation of 3D printed food from “mixed waste,” to be served “when traditional food is unavailable.
I can’t wait to see Gordon Ramsay enthusiastically frying a big, juicy soy steak and pretending it’s as good as the real thing.
Never mind the pandemic
Thank God, at last an announcement. I have been on tenterhooks waiting for this. I’m going to send my vote off straight away
BBC Indian Sportswoman of the Year nominees revealed – BBC Sport
PV Sindhu AND Aditi Ashok are both on the voting list!!! Don’t do this to me BBC I can’t make my mind up!
Aditi every time
Surely this is racist?
Can you imagine the uproar at
“BBC White Sportsman of the year”
😱
Equality and Diversity is allowed to include positive discrimination favouring any and every ethnic / gender / sexuality grouping EXCEPT straight white males – and especially straight white working-class males.
You put it better than me CR – I would just have said, well, “maybe racist but in good way”
I can’t bring myself to click a BBC link these days so you’ll have to enlighten me. Is this people from India or British-Indians?
This rancid NWO compliant caretaker administration may well declare the scamdemic over due to the growing mountain of stats thàt cannot be denied, but nothing changes until they repeal the Draconian corona virus act!
They also need to repeal the Public Health Act 1984 which is what they used for a lot of the restrictions. That’s just for starters. The Civil Contingencies Act has more enforcement of regular parliamentary scrutiny but the likelihood is that MPs would have gone along with it had it been used, at least to start with, so ideally I think we need to see proper constitutional protection for basic freedoms that cannot be removed under any circumstances, a complete ban on the use of Nudge Units and on governments buying advertising space for propaganda purposes (one would need to find a way to word that so that basic public information can still be published, perhaps limited to notification of changes in the law/regulations rather than “guidance”). I doubt we’ll see it in my lifetime but there needs to be a recognition that covid was not a deadly pandemic by any rational definition of the word, and that governments cannot stop respiratory viruses nor should they try.
Excellent. I won’t hold my breath for it to happen though
Fascists don’t “repeal” their tyranny.
Indeed they do not, unless forced. The ultimate backstop is a much more politically aware, cynical and obstreperous populace, with a much keener sense of when governments are overreaching, but we are far away from that right now.
Absolutely. These things get stopped, not withdrawn. The primary method is disobedience not legislation.
Surely the true answer, that everyone here knows, is that without a declared emergency the government and big Pharma will be liable for the side effects and damage done by their ‘vaccines’.
UTT you make a very valid point. But pharma may be able to escape liability should their covid products be accepted to the child vaccination schedule:
https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/vaccinations/nhs-vaccinations-and-when-to-have-them/
I’m an unvaxxed septuagenarian. These conniving bastards have had two years out of my life. I’m somewhat averse to shoving chemical swabs deep up my nostrils so as far as I’m concerned all this shit won’t be over until all travel restrictions are removed – home and away! https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/france-spain-denmark-change-travel-23011589.amp
Cheers!
Snap Pendilino. Hols are suspended (possibly for my lifetime). Living in Spain for the last 20yrs, life could be much worse, but I’m incandescent at the injustice and mendacity of it all. If you want to boost your blood pressure, read ‘The Real Dr Fauci, Bill Gates and Big Pharma’ by Robert F Kennedy Jr. What a bunch of ‘CU next Tuesdays.
The Together declaration was on GB News last night, they said we are not stopping at mandatory NHS jabs, we wan’t to make sure they can never lock us down ever again. That sounds great but with this new online safety fascism, surely if the government ignores any legislation, a bit like the current Nurenburg code, Bill of Rights, Human Rights, and somebody tries blowing the whistle, this new safety fascism will come down on them. Dangerous misinformation of course!
Mandatory jabs are being sought via the regulatory bodies, Javid is asking for this as a condition of being able to practise as a health professional.
As we saw with the Steve James incident, it is bad optics that cause them to retreat.
Perhaps a flash mob similar to the one chanting at Kier Starmer for every senior government figure is the only way to stop this.
Associate them all with the word “traitor”. Propaganda works both ways.
Sadly this has been spun as anti-vax rather than criticising him for being absent in his role as leader of the opposition & not standing up for the working person by promoting & voting for lockdowns.
it is only people who are against mandatory vaccines etc. who are complaining as well that he has failed in his job, the others were not bothered that he was in favour of more lockdownds and restrictions
It was clear as sky from the beginning it has nothing to do with health. So why would it be any different now??
They will only declare it over when they are ready to launch the next one – Gates and Javid are on the same page keeping the fear smouldering.
How would Johnson manage without his “Emergency Powers?
I see Esther McVey is calling out the Government ( Javid?) for allegedly secretly planning to use the sold-out MHRA to force injections on the Health Service Workers by the back-door without using the ‘mandate’ option. They will try to pass all responsibility for enforcing their Diktats down the line to companies and lower levels of Administration
They are all so devious! We can trust none of them with our lives, or our future!
Its insidiuous, the outsourcing of constraints. Its exactly what they are doing with climate change policy and just about anything else that matters. It becomes so intertwined in every day issues that its near impossible to remove. They pass some nebulous legislation containing wish lists ( like the recent ‘levelling up’ one) and then construct edicts that never go in front of MPs , get drip fed through the media, and before you know it our lives contain new rules and regulations that no-one ever discussed or voted on.
This is how they construct our totalitarian prison, boil the frog slowly, the vast majority don’t know ( or seemingly care) when their freedoms die.
Would the ages at which people are dying be available?
I wonder if there is a rise in younger than average deaths hidden by the dead-wood having been removed?
The Governent killed off all the old people by infecting the Care Homes. And then the NHS killed off all the sick people by withdrawing all medical services for a year.
So now we are a much more healthy country. Three cheers for SAGE and the NHS!
If the government gets its Assisted Suicide bill through, and we can kill off all the people over 60, we will stay a healthy country. Plus, we won’t have to pay out any pensions. Obviously the next plan for the establishment. Of course, taxes will have to rise the support the administration….
They didn’t infect the Care Homes they used The Liverpool Care pathway to create a false wave of deaths by manipulation of a Laboratory test not fit for purpose.I bore witness and my statement is with the Met.I guess that makes me a marked man they have my personal details.There is no evidence that Covid 19 exists rebranded cold/flu but you guys all know that.
ps as a Persona non grata Nurse I need any ideas to support myself perhaps Go Fund Me!!
Tiktok
I’m not fat enough.
And yet deaths amongst those aged 45-65 are 5 standard deviations (‘substantial increase’) above the normal range, and has been so since the summer. There seems to be little effect of ‘covid wave’ — it is just a relentless excess of deaths. I wonder why.
(Ignore the yellow bit in the graph — that shows a decline because the data for recent weeks hasn’t been fully processed yet)
Climate change?
Seriously though, cancelled operations and general lack of medical care that has filtered through since spring 2020?
I only know people who have been maimed or killed by the jab, I know no one personally that has had any lasting effects from the coof.
I’ve talked to many people who have a different take. They will recount stories of a relative/friend/neighbour/work colleague who is in hospital and had COVID. Yes they were old/had a heart attack or whatever but the COVID is the No1 worry. As far as these people are concerned COVID killed the person and that is set in stone. Nothing will change their minds.
Just when we thought the mental screwups of modern capitalism couldn’t get worse…the large majority are digging themselves ever deeper into mental holes – and even more so than with fashion and consumerism, with video games and mobile phone use, this is right “up close and personal”, to do with how people relate
We critical few look at this and we think how vile and how scary it is… Probably quite a few of us oscillate between being stultified and being terrified.
Others look at it and think “£$£ opportunity £$£.”
And a very very few actually created the profit-making opportunity and control the lion’s share of it – and they’ve absolutely no plans to relent. Quite the contrary.
Depends how good their security is I guess. Remember in the News last year about a death threat at the WEF….They had to cancel their conference.
If people have totally bought into the whole pandemic cobblers then it will indeed be set in stone. Their beliefs and behaviours have to be justified. .
Yes: non-existent or wrong “medical care” for problems of specific kinds. Officially the leading cause of death for men aged 50-64 is heart disease, and for women it is bronchial, tracheal or lung cancer. Which is not to say that those statements convey very much, because the available categories and how they are organised will be determined by big business. Which doesn’t mean only Big Pharma: for example, there won’t be a Medical Certificate of Cause of Death in the entire country that mentions living next door to a nuclear power station, an electricity substation, or a cellphone mast, or sleeping next to a zuzzing fusebox, as a contributory cause of death. The suicide figures have probably been fiddled downwards too. And something new, whatever it is, still seems to be going on. What is it? Medics have long been liars – ever since they started ministering to hoi polloi – but what may have happened is that that relationship has been “stretched out”, become more extreme. The contempt and lies and craziness have intensified. But what do we expect given that for long periods beginning in March 2020 the whole attitude was “Stay away from hospitals, you dirty lergy-spreaders”?… Read more »
Could be. There are a few options — you’d have thought government would be throwing money at research to find out why, but research into ‘effects of covid’ gets all the money and research into ‘government’s response to covid’ gets crumbs.
On a related subject, do GPs get extra funding for covid/long covid patients or are they just obsessed? I went to my GP with a nasty rash on my hands and her first question was – ‘so when did you have Covid?’ – I think she was a bit disappointed when I said I haven’t had it.
it’s a vax AE symptom, so obviously Doc thinks it’s covid, like all the other AE symptoms.
Sorry posted a few seconds after you before I saw your post, about the same thing. It is relentless isn’t it.
How many intervals of what length is the standard deviation calculated over?
And how large is it, measured in deaths per 1000 in that age group?
I’m looking at the z-score of 15 for one of the weeks in January 2021. The average death rate per 1000 in the 45-65 group is probably (at a guess) around 5. I’ve no idea what the standard deviation is but presumably there is a bit of jumping around and so (again a guess) it could be say 0.4. If that is anywhere near a reasonable guess, then z=15 would give a death rate of 11, more than twice the normal figure. Were things that bad?
Certainly sustained z≃5 needs an explanation.
Freecumbria’s post has some raw numbers that should illustrate the absolute magnitude of z=5ish.
Still a big difference between what is happening in working ages and the oldest ages, bearing in mind that the oldest ages drive total death numbers.
Let’s look at the age 45-64 age group. And look at deaths per million in this age group. We can see (despite the jumble of lines) that the green line for 2022 for week 4 is running above most recent years apart from 2021.
So that is possibly connected with the continuing high home deaths, and may reflect a lack of access to healthcare or be related to the experimental vaccines. Certainly nothing to do with covid the illness.
But perhaps a lot more to do with “Covid -the Vaccines”!
It’s strange that the 5-9 age group (who haven’t been experimentally vaccinated on apart from an unlucky few) are still experiencing very low mortality and have been for some time.
But if we look at the highest age group for which we have long term data and that is banded at both ends, ages 75-84, and again look at deaths per million, we see from the green line the opposite affect. Deaths running very low here in this age group. Presumably because of an absence of ‘dry timber’ for want of a more human expression.
It’s these older age groups including the over 80s that is the reason total deaths are running below ‘average’.
I suggest that there is an impact of the vaccines in ‘excess deaths’ of something like 15 per week per million (say, just eyeballing it for now) and that this is less dependent on age.
So, for older age groups the death rate swamps that 15 per million.
But for lower age groups that 15 per million is very important.
Add to that the suggestion that ‘all the very ill people succumbed to covid during 2020, Jan 2021 and summer 2021’, then this could readily result in lower death rates in those in the oldest age groups but noticeable increased death rates in younger age groups.
Yes, agree.
That’s one of the shocking things that the experimental vaccines can do a lot of harm in the oldest age groups without it being at all apparent in the overall death numbers, because of the dry tinder affect.
And in the working age groups you don’t notice the affect on mortality at all unless you look at mortality by age band because the oldest drive the overall death numbers without banding.
Europe Reloaded reports that same phenomena in Spain
.
Cascón Porres commented on the rise in unexplained deaths:
The UPM researcher noted that it made little sense that all of this data was only used to produce reports on excess mortality, but not to look for the cause.
https://www.europereloaded.com/the-high-mortality-rate-in-spain-puzzles-experts/
Deaths within 14 days of injection happening at home perhaps (ref VAERS data)
. (https://odysee.com/@alltheworldsastage:0/3+Hours-Reading-900+-COVID-Vaccine-Deaths-ALL-Day-0—Day-1-After-InjectionShot-VAERS-Reports:9)
See how the sold-out Mirror touches its cap to tyrants and prints their propaganda bulletins !
They won’t. Things will be allowed to drop away (albeit slowly) but I can’t see them ever saying ‘it’s over’.
Pandemic mania will be discussed by a range of epis and activists including Professor Sunetra Gupta, this Saturday 12/2 at Take Back Our Lives 10-6pm at a venue near Baker Street. DS readers welcome https://leftlockdownsceptics.com/2022/01/lls-presents-take-back-our-lives/
Virus will still be useful to TRPTB in order to achieve control via digital ID, so they won’t give up the fear porn easily.
That’s their endgame and route to permanent power over us all – they think.
But, who knows for sure. Everyone makes mistakes including/especially those bastards. (Blair, Gates et al).
My fear is of mandatory mrna jabs. synthesized gene sequencing for any and all human ailments you could think of and for eternity – or as long as the human survives.
Of course the jabs can’t affect your DNA?
Say hello to polymerase Theta for that one lol. – quite apart from the trashing of your innate immune system to get the thing into your cells, and they haven’t a clue as to precisely how that works either.
Try to understand the immune system before you mess with it. Nature is biting back…
Discovery identifies a highly efficient human reverse transcriptase that can write RNA sequences into DNA — ScienceDaily
SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33330870/
Innate Immune Suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes and microRNAs
and…
https://www.authorea.com/users/455597/articles/552937-innate-immune-suppression-by-sars-cov-2-mrna-vaccinations-the-role-of-g-quadruplexes-exosomes-and-micrornas
Thank you for the links.
Bound to be mentioned in the MSM soon.
Do you think the expert “vaccine” developers know of this?
They had plenty of evidence from the failed SARs 1 mRNA vaccines that killed all the test animals.
They probably have “plausible deniability” about these effects on Humans, because they didn’t look for them, and their “trials” were designed not to find them.
Once again, this is not about health. It never has been.
..
Does that mean that they won’t be requiring visitors to their country to show a jab-pass on entry?
I think visitors from EU/EEA/other Nordic countries won’t
The government will declare the ‘pandemic’ over when it’s most politically expedient to do so.
Just like they started and perpetuated the ‘pandemic’ according to their own arbitrary, convenient, logic.
https://rumble.com/vnbrwx-my-jaw-dropped-when-i-tested-someones-immune-system-after-the-2nd-jab..html
Tried to link this to my earlier post re trashing of immune system after mrna jabs, evidence of
This ‘deaths in private homes still running high’ bothers me. I doubt very much that these are people who have come to the end of the line, and willingly and peacefully shuffle off their mortal coil in their own beds. More likely they have repeatedly tried to see a gp, or being frail, have asked for a gp to come and see them. (which ain’t going to happen is it? An elderly infirm friend was asked to take a photo of her varicose ulcer, despite having no means to take a picture, or e mail it on, and was spoken to as if she was being a right stupid nuisance). Otherwise I expect they have been waiting hours for an ambulance and have died before it could arrive, or else they’ve been fobbed off by 111. A friend recently waited 11 HOURS for an ambulance. It’s disgraceful. People are dying because we have virtually no non urgent medical care in large swathes of the country.
Or because they are so afraid of actually being taken into hospital (disappearing into the ‘system’ as they’d see it) and not being allowed visitors or any communication with their loved ones. How frightening that would be for an elderly person, with no mobile phone, and no support. I’m sure there are many like that who would rather die in their own bed.
A dear friend of mine, in her mid 80s, had a fall last year and after a spell in hospital was discharged to a Nursing Home. She has no family and I would love to visit her. All I know is that she is in one of three Homes but it has been impossible to find out which one. I have contacted all 3 but each one has told me they’re not allowed to divulge whether she’s with them. She must feel totally abandoned.
send mail to her at all 3, put your ‘if undelivered’ return address on the back.
Failing that phone them up claiming to be her relative demanding to find where she was sent after the hospital visit.
Go to your MP
Very true – and that is why I would refuse to go to hospital.
All of these draconian lockdowns and NPIs were marketed as being necessary to protect “public health?”
At this point, does anyone really think that “public health” is better today than it was two years ago? It’s far worse. The Law of Opposite Effects kicks in yet again.
What date is the CoronaCircus Act (the Greatest Show In Town) due to be ‘renewed’? No doubt this will be spun out till then, at least.
It will not be renewed and ends late Marh 2022. Certain clauses may be saved to amend other legislation though
THE MIDDLE CLASSES ARE LOVING IT!
ScotRail’s peak services ‘won’t return to pre-Covid levels’ – BBC News
Surprise, surprise, the middle classes are not going back to work! Confirming for many that the last two years was a holiday (no commute and lots of extra free time and money to buy a new house – the soda bread baking generation). Hence what was there to question (actually more freedom in a perverse way), especially if you were in the public sector on full pay.
So the future is hybrid working for the middle classes who the working classes will service, whilst the working classes themselves can get stuffed, or vote for the ‘labour’ party. Oh dear.
Its also a potential source of the biggest money savers for the taxpayer.
All those WFH for the past 18 months are now deemed surplus to requirements & get statutory redundancy only.
soon to be called UBI
But they’re sacrificing their kids in the long run.