Justice For the Hyde Park One

There follows a guest post by Andrew Rootsey, the solicitor acting for Debbie Hicks, an anti-lockdown protestor. Debbie is hoping to appeal two recent conviction to the High Court, but needs to raise £10,000 to do so. You can find her DonorBox fundraiser here.

As you may recall, we secured Debbie’s acquittal at Cheltenham Magistrates Court on the December 20th 2021 for offences relating to organising/being involved in organising a gathering of more than 30 people during a period of national lockdown or alternatively for participating in the gathering.

The relevant gathering was a protest held in Stratford Park in Stroud in November 2020 against the restrictions imposed on the British public under the Coronavirus Regulations. The protest was called the ‘Freedom Rally’ and was attended by more than 50 people.

The Stroud ‘Freedom Rally’ was held two days into the second national lockdown and therefore at the time it was illegal to organise a gathering of more than 30 people or to meet in groups of more than two people. A conviction would have left her liable for a £10,000 fine.

Ms. Hicks was acquitted of both offences after the court accepted our argument that her arrest and prosecution was a disproportionate interference with her human rights – namely the rights to freedom of expression and freedom of assembly, given that she was engaging in a legitimate protest.

The court found that Ms. Hicks had organised the ‘Freedom Rally’ and had breached the Coronavirus Regulations in force at the time by doing so. However, she had a reasonable excuse because she was attending a legitimate, peaceful and well-organised protest. The officers on the ground at the protest had been labouring under a misapprehension of the law – that protesting was not lawful under the Regulations – and were essentially imposing a blanket ban on protesting. Therefore, their actions in arresting her were not rational or proportionate.

In complete contrast – and a perfect example of how this contentious piece of legislation is flawed and open to misinterpretation – on the November 16th 2021 the City of London Magistrates Court convicted Debbie of breaching similar coronavirus regulations by protesting in Hyde Park against the imposition of lockdown restrictions during the pandemic. The District Judge in this case found that Debbie did not have a ‘reasonable excuse’ for protesting and found that the interference with her Human Rights was proportionate. Debbie was convicted and sentenced to a financial penalty.

The case raises important issues on freedom of expression and assembly, as well as the chilling of the right to protest. We wish to appeal this case to the High Court in order for the High Court to settle the important questions of law raised.

A fundamental consideration for the High Court is the ambiguity of the right to protest during the Coronavirus pandemic during periods of national lockdown and the operation of the ‘reasonable excuse’ jurisdiction in this regard.

The Government has made it clear, as have the courts, including in Debbie’s case before the Cheltenham Magistrates Court, that protesting during the Coronavirus pandemic was never illegal. Yet that was not always clear from the Coronavirus regulations nor was it the understanding of most police officers. How the reasonable excuse defence is to operate in these circumstances requires clarity and we are confident that the High Court will settle the issue in our favour and set a precedent for future cases and those seeking to appeal against their own convictions.

Debbie Hicks is probably best known for filming within the Gloucester Royal Hospital in December 2020 during Tier 3 restrictions. Debbie did so, exercising her freedom of expression, in order to highlight that Government restrictions were having a devastating effect upon access to healthcare across the board and to investigate mainstream media reports that hospitals were overflowing with patients.

Despite her efforts to avoid confrontation, she was challenged at the hospital by two employees. During the exchange, which lasted less than a minute, Debbie did not film the staff members. She explained the purpose of her visit and her views as to the provision of NHS services during lockdown. Staff members took offence at her comments and subsequently made a complaint to the police. Debbie immediately left the hospital voluntarily and was subsequently arrested at her home in front of her family and charged with using abusive, threatening or disorderly words or behaviour.

Debbie was not at the hospital deliberately seeking an encounter with staff. She has in the past been a vociferous supporter of the NHS and has supported NHS staff in respect of vaccine mandates.

In connection with this episode, Debbie stood trial for an offence under Section 5 of Public Order Act on January 6th 2022 and having adjourned the case in order to hand down his judgement the District Judge convicted Debbie of a S5 Public Order Act offence on January 19th 2022 at Cirencester Magistrates Court.

We wish to appeal this conviction as well and ask that the High Court settle this case on the basis that the District Judge was wrong in law to convict Debbie of this offence. We are firmly of the view that the Prosecution case simply did not cross the threshold of what constitutes abusive, threatening or disorderly words or behaviour. The District Judge’s analysis was flawed and did not properly interpret Supreme Court authorities nor give appropriate weight to Debbie’s rights of freedom of expression and assembly as enshrined in the European Convention for Human Rights, nor give appropriate weight to the political nature of Debbie’s views when the case law makes clear political freedom of expression should be given special protection.

Debbie is trying to raise £10,000 to take both cases to the High Court. She hopes that those who continue to believe in freedom of speech and the the right to protest will continue to support her. Our hope is that if we can get these convictions overturned, it will set a legal precedent for those convicted of similar offences and who may face prosecution in the future.

Debbie needs to raise funds in order to pay her legal costs and any help is hugely appreciated. Her fundraiser can be found here.

Andrew Rootsey is a solicitor at Murray Hughman.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

41 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
PatrickF
PatrickF
4 years ago

I will not be contributing to Boris Johnson’s fundraiser.

iane
iane
4 years ago
Reply to  PatrickF

Fear not, Bozo will find a Tory donor who wants something in return for any needed funds!

FrankFisher
4 years ago
Reply to  PatrickF

You will and you don’t have any choice.

Lockdown Sceptic
4 years ago
Reply to  PatrickF

Pharma Racing to Produce an Omicron Booster – Why?
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/02/01/omicron-vaccine-race.aspx
Israel has already proved that COVID boosters are a dismal failure – they now have the highest COVID case rate per capita of any country in the world since the start of the pandemic. So what good will an Omicron booster do, especially if the masses gain natural immunity from the variant? 

Race Is On for an Omicron Jab
Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola 

We need far more people at all our events here  
 if we want the tyranny to end for good 

Tuesday 1st February 2pm to 3pm
 Yellow Boards By the Road  
Between Henley Bridge & Little Angel Pub
White Hill A4130
Henley-on-Thames RG9 2LY

Stand in the Park Sundays 10am  make friends, ignore the madness & keep sane 
Wokingham Howard Palmer Gardens Cockpit Path car park Sturges Rd RG40 2HD  
Henley Mills Meadows (at the bandstand) Henley-on-Thames RG9 1DS

Telegram Group 
http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell

Bella Donna
4 years ago

No one broke the coronavirus rules more than our own Government so lets have no more nonsense.

WatTyler
WatTyler
4 years ago

Can’t she call Boris and Carrie Johnson as witnesses?

Bonce
Bonce
4 years ago

Why are you feeding the beast? The beast being the legal profession in this case which makes millions per year through fleecing peopleout of their hard earned cash
.
We shouldnt be respecting any of these convid convictions or the fines, and we should not be leigitimising it by appealing to authority.

Walk away

RTSC
RTSC
4 years ago

I’ve made a small donation.

Cecil B
Cecil B
4 years ago

The call or ‘Christian forgiveness’ is pure Gove

On the face of it a call for kindness and understanding from a decent chap

Nothing could be further from the truth. Implicit in the request for forgiveness is an acknowledgment that a wrong has been committed

Once the wrong is admitted then the Pig Dictator is out of the door creating an opportunity for Gove

An act of forgiveness, loyalty and backstabbing all in one go

This man is pure evil

DanClarke
DanClarke
4 years ago

‘it was illegal to organise a gathering of more than 30 people or to meet in groups of more than two people’.  Surprised there’s any traction in this statement now.

cornubian
4 years ago

I will donate again to Debbies fund because she is a true hero of our times but at the same time my gift is tempered by the knowledge that, in general, law is not there to serve us.

It is created by, and designed to protect, the parasites who are now leading us to destruction.

Time and again during this hoax we have seen relevant cases of high merit being summarily dismissed by the regimes judicial gatekeepers.

It has therefore been clear for some time that there is a vast difference between law and justice. Debbie deserves justice but may well suffer at the hands of the law.

Although I wish her well, resistors need to remember that authoritarian regimes respond only to pressure, not argument.

cornubian
4 years ago
Reply to  cornubian

I have now made my donation and would urge all resistors to do likewise simply because she was there for us and now we need to be there for her.

cornubian
4 years ago
Reply to  cornubian

Quick update from this morning when I noticed the fund stood at approx £3000 from around 110 donors. It now stand at £5200 from 170 donors so a big thank you to the Daily Sceptic team and readers for pushing that sum up today – but still a way to go so come on folks.

Life is a journey; are we there yet?
Life is a journey; are we there yet?
4 years ago
Reply to  cornubian

I have made a donation. Debbie was brave enough to do what some of us should have done and didn’t.

Arfur Mo
Arfur Mo
4 years ago
Reply to  cornubian

Now at £9120 from 313 donations – including mine.

Cecil B
Cecil B
4 years ago

Will a Tory donor pay the Pig Dictators fixed penalty ticket?

Bonce
Bonce
4 years ago
Reply to  Cecil B

He should be fined £1,000 for his choice of wallpaper and another £1,000 for his bad taste in women

FrankFisher
4 years ago
Reply to  Bonce

I suspect they are connected

FrankFisher
4 years ago

BBC and the Guardian posting almost word-for-word “fact checks” of Rogan today – all distorting garbage, as you’d expect. Once again, who tells them to post this? One thing that leaps out is that, not content with changing the definition of pandemic and vaccine, the cabal now looks to be changing the definition of “gene therapy” to protect the jabs. They claim a gene therapy is a *permanent* change to the human genome. Nope, simply untrue.That may be a distant and likely impossible dream; all the gene therapies I’m aware of are certainly short lived and often highly localised. The jabs fit right into the range of treatments offered. It really is a gene therapy, and just like most claimed gene therapies, it doesn’t work.

TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
4 years ago
Reply to  FrankFisher

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC8546144/

It certainly has long term effects

Here, we report, besides generation of neutralizing antibodies, consistent alterations in hemoglobin A1c, serum sodium and potassium levels, coagulation profiles, and renal functions in healthy volunteers after vaccination with an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Similar changes had also been reported in COVID-19 patients, suggesting that vaccination mimicked an infection. Single-cell mRNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) before and 28 days after the first inoculation also revealed consistent alterations in gene expression of many different immune cell types. Reduction of CD8+ T cells and increase in classic monocyte contents were exemplary. Moreover, scRNA-seq revealed increased NF-κB signaling and reduced type I interferon responses, which were confirmed by biological assays and also had been reported to occur after SARS-CoV-2 infection with aggravating symptoms. Altogether, our study recommends additional caution when vaccinating people with pre-existing clinical conditions, including diabetes, electrolyte imbalances, renal dysfunction, and coagulation disorders.

TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
4 years ago
Reply to  FrankFisher

Emails Expose Fauci, Collins Collusion To ‘Smear’ Anti-Lockdown Scientists | ZeroHedge

Perhaps Fauci’s controllers were behind the smears on Rogan?

tom171uk
4 years ago

What doesn’t receive enough attention is the reprehensible behaviour of the police. Failing to properly understand the law is bad enough, but if they are in any doubt then they should err on the side of not pushing people around. Instead they have lied (either intentionally or through ignorance) and bullied many people with alacrity.

They have been aided and abetted in this by a government that has allowed them to issue fixed penalty notices, bypassing the courts. (Theoretically the accused can go to court but at considerable cost – a tried and trusted business model that discourages them from standing up for themselves.) It is a small, but important, step closer to a police state and should be challenged.

John Dee
4 years ago
Reply to  tom171uk

It may be my imagination, but the way the police conduct themselves seems to have worsened since they were forced to start recruiting shortarses. Is it just a case of over-reach resulting from more-widespread self-confidence issues?

MTF
MTF
4 years ago

I can’t comment on the legal aspects but her videos of Gloucester hospital were grossly misleading. The first one was taken in the outpatients department on Dec 27th when it is closed! To use the time and goodwill of hard-pressed NHS workers in such a flagrant act of deception is immoral even if its legal.

John Dee
4 years ago
Reply to  MTF

If you want to use terms like ‘flagrant act’, why not start with the decanting of untested elderly ‘bed-blockers’ back to care homes where they could infect and kill their co-inmates and then die unvisited by their loved ones?

John Dee
4 years ago
Reply to  MTF

If you want to use terms like ‘flagrant act’ in connection with the NHS, why not start with the decanting of untested elderly ‘bed-blockers’ back to care homes where they could infect and kill their co-inmates and then die unvisited by their loved ones?

Jane G
Jane G
4 years ago

I’ve donated but – damn it- I wish it hadn’t been powered by PayPal; I boycotted them after they joined in the tech censorship bandwagon.

cornubian
4 years ago
Reply to  Jane G

I paid by debit card no problem.

TheBluePill
4 years ago

Another £20 pledged to support Debbie and well worth it.

Leonk
Leonk
4 years ago

So, is it correct to assume that since the PM & his ilk ignored the mandates that all those members of the public who were fined for similar will have their fines quashed ?

Fingerache Philip
Fingerache Philip
4 years ago
Reply to  Leonk

Don’t hold your breath.

John Dee
4 years ago

Surely, one should try to do just that, during an outbreak of respiratory disease?

Chilli
Chilli
4 years ago

Donated.

Wondering if the court will be fining the BBC’s Clive Myrie for walking through a ward with a consultant pointing the camera at patients going ‘unvaccinated, unvaccinated’. By contrast Debbie Hicks didn’t point-at or bother anyone.

Fingerache Philip
Fingerache Philip
4 years ago
Reply to  Chilli

CM isn’t in the same league as that out and out fear spreader and doom monger, Fergus Walsh.
I well remember Walsh being driven along deserted streets during the first lockdown describing how people were cowering indoors in fear of the killer Covid, no, you pratt, they along with the rest of the population were under house arrest by orders of our government “following scientific advice “

PW
PW
4 years ago

I too have donated…..

Got to say there seem to be a disappointing number of comments (and presumably donations) for this article, which highlights that Debbie was out there actually doing something to expose what was happening while most of the rest of us were observing!

I’ve thought it was a complete over reaction from the very start, it’s divided our family right down the middle, to the extent that we don’t discuss it any more, to avoid arguments.

Toby, is it worth repeating this article to drum up some more support?

I’m now off to make another donation, and well done Debbie!

Peter.

PW
PW
4 years ago
Reply to  PW

Done….

4PureBlood
4PureBlood
4 years ago

Our healthcare system is about to experience a tsunami! Potential side effects of jabs include chronic inflammation, because the vaccine continuously stimulates the immune system to produce antibodies. Other concerns include the possible integration of plasmid DNA into the body’s host genome, resulting in mutations, problems with DNA replication, triggering of autoimmune responses, and activation of cancer-causing genes. Alternative COVID cures EXIST. Ivermectin is one of them. While Ivermectin is very effective curing COVID symptoms, it has also been shown to eliminate certain cancers. Do not get the poison jab. Get your Ivermectin today while you still can! https://ivmpharmacy.com

huxleypiggles
4 years ago

Donation made.

Ms Hicks doesn’t half make me feel like a coward.

Good luck Debbie.

Idris
Idris
4 years ago

Debbie Hicks has my support. However maybe she should admit to organising a party not a protest. That seems to work for the politicians.

Arfur Mo
Arfur Mo
4 years ago

“Debbie immediately left the hospital voluntarily and was subsequently arrested at her home in front of her family and charged with using abusive, threatening or disorderly words or behaviour.”

Was any evidence of this presented in court? Ah, from the Grauniad article, it was a ‘feelings’ thing, two against one.