Parties at Number 10 Suggest Boris and His Team Thought Covid Restrictions Were Pointless. So Why Did They Impose Them?
I’ve written a comment piece for Mail+ about the recent spate of revelations about Downing Street parties, pointing out that it isn’t just Tory politicians and their staff who’ve been ignoring the Covid restrictions.
It’s worth bearing in mind that it isn’t just Conservative politicians and their senior aides who ignored the restrictions they expected the rest of us to comply with.
A photograph emerged last night of Sir Keir Starmer, the leader of the Opposition, drinking a beer with Labour staff in a constituency office in Durham when Tier 2 measures were in place. Given that Starmer has consistently called for even tougher Covid restrictions in England – much like those imposed by Mark Drakeford, the Welsh Labour leader – this is another example of flagrant hypocrisy.
Mind you, Drakeford himself is no angel. In November of last year he was photographed dancing in a crowded room at a Diwali celebration without a mask, breaking his government’s own rules making them compulsory in all indoor spaces.
And let’s not forget Sadiq Kahn, the mayor of London. In October, he berated Boris for not following Drakeford’s lead and imposing a mask mandate and condemned those who refused to voluntarily wear face coverings as ‘selfish’. A few days later he was photographed at a crowded party with Liverpool footballer Mo Salah with no masks in sight.
This begs the question: Why have all these advocates of lockdowns and related restrictions been flagrantly ignoring the rules?
It’s not a straightforward example of ‘do as I say, not what I do’ – something we’ve grown used to from the political class – because these leaders supposedly had a vested interest in following their own rules. After all, weren’t they worried about catching the virus? They told us these measures were for our own protection.
The only explanation I can think of is that they knew some of these rules were pointless. We now know that many of the non-pharmaceutical interventions governments made around the world to try to control successive waves of Covid infections made little or no impact on the overall ebb and flow of each variant. Just look at Sweden, which didn’t impose a lockdown in 2020 and had one of the lowest excess death rates in Europe that year.
More recently, Boris himself proved the doom-mongers of Sage wrong when he ignored their apocalyptic predictions of what would happen if he didn’t impose tighter restrictions – 5,000 deaths a day, said Professor Lockdown. The Omicron variant, like the previous ones, has proved self-limiting and begun to fade without the Government doing much at all.
But this begs another question: If they knew the rules were pointless, why did these political panjandrums advocate for them in the first place? My conspiracy-minded friends will say it’s because they were doing the bidding of an international cabal of rich, powerful men who had a vested interest in locking everyone down, whether because they would benefit financially – hello, Jeff Bezos – or because it helped advance their sinister political agenda known as ‘the Great Reset’. But I think the truth is less exciting.
I believe the reason the Government imposed three lockdowns – and countless restrictions in between – was because it calculated it was better to be seen to be doing something to try to suppress the virus rather than just ‘letting it rip’. Boris must have known over 100,000 Britons would likely die as a result of the pandemic and there was little he could do about that, but at least it would be harder for his political opponents to hang those deaths around his neck if he locked us all in our homes. And the reason his opponents criticised him for not going even further is because they hoped to do precisely that.
The one good thing to emerge from these scandals is that it will make it harder for the political class to play the public for fools again. If senior politicians ever impose another plethora of pointless, incomprehensible restrictions – whether Tory or Labour – I hope we’ll all pay about as much attention to them as they do.
Worth reading in full.
Stop Press: A leaving party was held at the Cabinet Office in December 2020 for Kate Josephs, head of the Government unit responsible for drawing up Covid restrictions. The Telegraph has more.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
I’m deeply suspicious about all of these party stories from 2020 surfacing now. Methinks someone wants to get rid of Johnson in order to replace him with someone more willing to enforce EU-style corona restrictions.
NB: In my opinion, Johnson should certainly go, or rather, be kicked out. But because of what he inflicted on the people of England, not because, he, too, like everyone else, broke every Corona restriction he could break.
It’s no coincidence, get rid of Boris and you rinse the public’s perception of wrong doing by providing someone to blame. That’s all these straw men exist for, there is no government in reality. Fauci is being prepared for sacrifice in a similar way, watch the lab leak theory gain traction in the media, and watch intelligent people fall for it hook, line and sinker.
They have worked the numbers and know vaccination uptake is tailing off, so it’s time for the next phase of the agenda, and that requires fresh faces to sell it.
But was it Moderna’s lab it leaked from?
“It’s no coincidence, get rid of Boris and you rinse the public’s perception of wrong doing by providing someone to blame.”
Cf. how Tony Blair is widely remembered as the war criminal he is, but Gordon Brown, who was a senior figure in Blair’s cabinet and in his war cabinet throughout Blair’s entire stint at Number 10 and who is therefore just as much a war criminal, is remembered as “austere Gordon”.
So, leaked DARPA document is a …..plant/forgery/something else? Fauci has been walking the political green mile for many months; he has been up to his neck in this for decades as revealed in massive detail by David Martin; Farrar saw the light and quit SAGE, van Tamm equally so and will disappear into academia having been party to wreaking massive financial, mental and physical health havoc on the UK since early 2020.
Johnson may well be the fall guy, but it might become very clear very quickly that Project Fear is to return – with viruses and EU as the subjects.
Politicians know Covid 19 is a scam and Climate change is a scam. They are part of the scam.
Environmental Levies
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2022/01/14/environmental-levies-3/
by Paul Homewood
Please come and join our friendly peaceful events.
Saturday 15th January 5pm
Silent lighted walk behind one simple sign
“No More Lockdown”
Bring torches, candles and other lights
Meet Corner of Castle Hill & High St,
Windsor SL4 1PQ
Stand in the Park Sundays 10am make friends, ignore the madness & keep sane
Wokingham Howard Palmer Gardens Cockpit Path car park Sturges Rd RG40 2HD
Henley Mills Meadows (at the bandstand) Henley-on-Thames RG9 1DS
Telegram Group
http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell
Excellent; I agree.
@RW – Agreed it strongly looks as though powerful figures want Boris Johnson out – and they are likely to get him out too. I’ll be very surprised if he’s still in office in February. As for the story about a “member of his immediate family” testing positive, then assuming it’s not one of his children, nor himself, and also assuming it’s true, then the only person it could be would be his wife, and why not say so? (Is she out and about? I have no idea, but the in-crowd will certainly know.) I don’t believe the story for a moment. More likely, he’s on his knees every day to US and Israeli diplomats, probably by now negotiating the Etonian or Sonning equivalent of making it to Heathrow before he gets clapped in handcuffs. There are many things that could ruin his reputation to a point where he’d be as unwelcome in the worlds of book publishing or after-dinner speeches as “Prince” Andrew already is. The Christine Lee story is probably to pull the rug out from under Jeremy Hunt (an Old Carthusian – don’t laugh.) Incidentally, I recall that Dominic Cummings has an interest in the Chinese state’s… Read more »
Who are these figures and what harm do they have planned for us? Is the EU demanding th eUK falls into line with their overt Fascism? Is Blair in the centre doing his rounds? We know he advised Gove of imposing vax passes.
We need Johnson to stay until we know what is really going on.
I agree. He shouldn’t be allowed to escape. No-one can undo the harm he’s allowed to be caused (always assuming he ever had any power at all) but as the frontman he should be punished by being made to squirm and snigger for as long as possible, and be the whipping boy for all those who’ve suffered terrible deprivation and heartache. He should NOT be allowed to slip into the shadows.
We need a full confession from him of what has been going on!
‘Thumb screws’ perhaps?
Well put. The only problem with Johnson going is that he will be replaced by someone who is even more of a lockdown fanatic.
0r even “greener”; i.e. even more willing to comply with the UN and WEF agendas.
EU using its many ‘sleepers’ in our Parliament to get rid of Johnson to impose the Full Nazi on the UK as UVDL wants?
Surely the logic of what you say must be that Johnson should stay unless we want total lockdown tyranny and forced vaccinations?
The sudden orchestration and drip feed release of all the party evidence suggest an organised plot – a campaign to get rid of his – but who are the backstabbers and what are their motives?
We can no longer trust this non-Conservative Conservative party of self-serving chancers with anything- least of all our medical health and our freedoms !
Trouble is Johnson and jabit are also pro vax tyrants , are you suggesting they’re now too weak to mandate jabs for all ?. Several Steve James character assassination pro forced injection articles doing the rounds this week , the government propaganda unit obviously kick starting in earnest.
My money is on Cummings – a Bolshevik if there ever was one.
Yes, much of it seems like diversionary tactics. Like the dripping of optimism to soften us up. Something wicked this way comes, perhaps?
Toby, a question: why is it the more left-leaning the politician, the more restrictive the lockdown measures?
Why the greater push for vaccines regardless of civil rights of necessity?
Why, if they knew the restrictions were pointless, did they flaunt them so flagrantly, eg, Pelosi, Newsome, Whitmer, Lightfoot, and our own deeply hypocritical politicians?
Because a greater number of them are deep state beneficiaries and employees. Many conservatives too, but more of them have their own businesses. How did Pelosi make her millions? She doesn’t have businesses. No-one seems to care.
Another Toby, Toby Green wrote a good piece on this and the failure of the left. It was on Unherd I think.
Pelosi is simply bat crazy!
Because The Left (as in grasping politicos and hangers-on, not people with real left wing views) see that the only way they will get their feet under the table is to offer more to the Davos crowd than the incumbents. Bliar is the epitome of that.
Dear Toby
You are Associate Editor at the Speccie and an engaging columnist and so it is disappointing that you so readily misuse of the term “to beg the question”, even though your points are otherwise well made. Could I recommend some revision of logical fallacies – did they not teach you this at Oxford?
No point just hinting at this: Begging the question refers to circular reasoning, Latin petitio principii, ie, a situation where the conclusion of some argument (or chain of arguments) is identical to one of the premises.
And while you’re about it, Toby, learn the difference in meaning between to pour over and to pore over.
”Death of the subs”, perhaps?
A more likely explanation is excessive use of spool chuckers.
I’ve decided that they knew by May 2020 that covid was nowhere near as risky as they’d originally thought, but by then they’d started to enjoy all the power they’d managed to give themselves. Beyond this, they’d also have had to explain to the country why they’d ruined the economy, given gazillions to pharma companies to develop vaccines etc etc.
So they thought the best thing to do would be to keep up the pretence.
they knew that before they imposed the first lockdown based on data out of Italy and the cruise ship.
and given the entire world knew this it really strains credulity to believe it was all “just a cock-up” for them all to lockdown at the same time.
In short – a conspiracy without precedent against the people of the world by the Elites in support of handing Global Hegemony to China and its repressive, paranoid ‘Social Model’ while concentrating all the world’s wealth into the hands of Billionaire Oligarchs, Banks and Corporates. The model involves eliminating at least 15% of the world’s population ( Gates’ figure) or most likely many more – the ridiculous figure of 500,000,000 as a desirable world population has been widely circulated. They have given themselves until 2030 to achieve it and seem to have made a good start. It look increasingly like comprehensive Health and Social Care in the UK is to be withdrawn from many of those who most need it. Sacking over 120,000 Health Service Workers for exercising what used to be their Human Rights to bodily autonomy for refusing to take endless injections of a product they have seen the damaging consequences of at first hand, ought to play its part in crashing the system! The same policy is being orchestrated in lock-step across the whole Western ( formerly democratic ) world as we enter the “post democratic age” of totally brutal tyranny and total indifference to human life.… Read more »
The Chinesse have come up with an even easier way to depopulate – you just starve people by keeping them under full house-arrest (as in Gi’an). Taking their cue from Stalin and what he did to the Ukrainians.
The change of definition of pandemic is a positive marker for the start of the fraud. The latest WHO definiton no longer has a requirement for fatalities, so the common cold is now a pandemic.
The word ‘pandemic’ is meaningless if it encompasses say a global new Black Death and the common cold.
Another marker was the UK government withdrawal of the High Consequence Infectious Disease designation shortly before it hit the UK.
Then there were changes to definition of cause of death, case, infection, along with removal of need for autopsy, and reliance on a nonsense PCR test.
Choice supportive bias
Confabulation
Escalation of commitment
Mission creep
Disconfirmed expectancy
Magical thinking
Fanaticism
Denialism
Delusion
Wishful thinking
Sunk cost fallacy
Foot in the door technique
But did they think it was risky at the time because they knew exactly where it had come from and how?
Across the whole of the western world?
Lockstep?
I can’t buy this I am afraid. If this were the case, they would have had a perfect opportunity in the Summer of 2020 to relax restrictions as cases and hospitalisations dropped to near zero and claim that they had won a stunning victory against the virus and it was all worth the costs. If they had stopped testing at that point, the pandemic would have been over. Instead, they introduced facemask mandates and we were clearly on course for another round of lockdowns in the winter.
In order to usher in the jabs under EUA
Yes, we need to stop pretending that this Regime has our interests at heart when they are merely applying the orders of their Globalist Masters.
We see clearly the total contempt in which their party- time “operatives’ hold the British people -the “plebs” ( Andrew Mitchell)
If you watch the excellent JP Sears on YouTube, taking the piss out of all and sundry with his ‘We Lie to You News’, you’ll see in his recent video The Narrative is Crumbling 16 Reasons Why that he poses the question – are they backing off to confuse us?
I think they realised that Covid was not as risky as they hoped!
Not to worry…… their jabs will continue to do their work.
If you listen/watch the briefing from Prof Wittery on 11 May 2020, it is very clear that he (and vacuous Vallance) knew very well that it wasn’t dangerous to many. He sounds measured and informative and reassuring – no doubt after this someone had a word in his shell-like and told him to wind his neck in, perhaps dangling a carrot – who knows?
”UK Gov’t confirms Covid19 harmless to VAST MAJORITY of people” – Youtube.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adj8MCsZKlg&feature=youtu.be
In Laura Dodsworth’s book she noted how early on Johnson was uttering the ‘build back better’ mantra. Note, you need to do enough damage or demolition first before you rebuild.
The planned it, they had to go through with it. They knew it was fake. Most of the excess deaths were people on vents sedated to death with midazolam, often in hospital for other reasons which they were not treated for so they died on covid wards, or they died in their domestic homes (approx 4000 excess deaths a month in this category for 18+ months). We were supposed to be on lockdowns for years. Trump has stopped this with operation warp speed. Their agenda is struggling as the people are fearful but not beaten down enough to accept vaccine passports. People can see the vaccines are not working and are causing harms, so the booster take up hasn’t been enough to get us all on the digital identity train. And you cannot force/mandate vaccines still in trial. We have A LOT to thank Trump for and it ain’t over yet.
Discovered that someone I know was persuaded by a forceful article in that renowned ‘Medical Journal’ – “The Daily Mail ” to rush out and take the booster he had been hesitating over………it apparently convinced him of the superiority of ‘vaccine’ delivered “immunity” (?) over natural immunity – words simply fail.
It ought to be against he law to lie to millions over the consequences of accepting an intrusive irreversible medical procedure. Apparently not.
But we do see how easy successful marketing makes it for anyone to become a ‘Snake Oil’ billionaire!
The following is based on a presentation on the Spike Protein shots give by Dr Peter McCulough on 3rd December
“The potentially hazardous mechanisms of action of the shots resulting in cell, tissue and organ damage
The presence of harmful spike protein in donated blood
Lack of genotoxicity, teratogenicity and oncogenicity studies
The effects of bioaccumulation in women’s ovaries
The potential for reduced fertility
The lack of a data and safety monitoring board (DSMB) to oversee clinical trials and post-market surveillance
The lack of human ethics committee to oversee clinical trials
The lack of restrictions on exempted groups from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) such as pregnant women, women of childbearing potential, COVID survivors (previously immune)
The lack of risk stratification for hospitalization and death in the clinical trials
The lack of data transparency
The lack of public risk mitigation (early and at-home treatment options)”
“The paper was sent to every health and regulatory agency in the world. Here we are in early 2022 and, well, you can see what the response was. It’s been nonexistent.”
I have a hospital appointment next week. They insist I undergo a COVID PCT test before I’m allowed the procedure, I do not believe that the PCR test is useful. Do I have any recourse? Can the hospital actually deny me the medical procedure due to their “policy”? I believe it is medical malpractice for them to deny me treatment for a conditionI that I am currently suffering with on the basis of the hypothetical fractional possibility that I might transmit COVID to someone else.
Can anyone suggest any experts I can contact to assist me?
Tell them that because of a childhood psychological trauma that you don’t want to discuss (because it will upset you), you have an irrational fear of having a PCR swab forceably shoved up your nose. No idea if that will work but worth a try.
They simply say “Hospital policy says no PCR, no procedure”
The miriaf website has a letter. Letter to private hospital challenging pre-surgery PCR test requirement – Miri AF
Thanks, DS99, that is useful. Is there any data on how useful/successful these letters have been?
LOL!
Drop me a line; I have a bridge for sale….
anytakers@suckersareus.com
To describe members of the public, who still believe this evil charade, as fools is rather overstating their status!!
It seems to me to be highly likely that some at least of those present at the parties were WFH and had travelled in specially to socialise, doubtless risking their own and other people’s lives in the process (sic). The people in number Ten are better able to assess the actual danger than almost anyone else in the country, and they clearly saw that there was little or none. It’s a shame they couldn’t bring themselves to tell that truth to the rest of us.
As evidenced by the fact none of them have dropped dead of Covid despite partying every other day during the lockdowns
Meanwhile check out he number of children and other ages who have died after being forced to take the injections.
The fact is they knew that they were risking no-one’s lives as they all know it is a scamdemic!
And like every other country in world they had the 350 pages of legislation ready. Even DS is rather quiet on the barbaric events going on in France, Germany, Austria, Italy, Australia, Canada – why have the political class in all these countries subjected their people to systematic psychological and physical abuse.
That’s the question. My reading is that there are two crises in play, a fake one for us, the plandemic, and the real one. An imminent collapse of the economic system which they hope to fix by corralling everyone on to CBDCs. There’s no other way to explain the desperation they are displaying to force everyone to get on board. They haven’t just become evil (their actions are) ; they are panicking about imminent unrest and financial disintegration. That’s the only way I can make sense of it.
And their actions, so far, have been counterproductive if the aim is to counter unrest.
Unrest? They would welcome it – they can use the brutal force they have planned against unarmed civilians and lock people up in their new giant prisons. The can ensure there would be no coverage on the BBC.
Ask Mr Gates for his views on the desirable level of world population and how it might be achieved – he is very free with his answers!
He has a huge investment in the process at every level !
Isn’t it getting to be time to think the unthinkable?
Exactly.
Lord Tyrannus was a Nero figure: lazy, incompetent, disengaged. He neither knew the measures were pointless nor cared. So it wasn’t cockup so much as negligence and letting junior staff set the agenda. It wasn’t a conpiracy either since Tyrannus had no meaningful impact on policy. Underlings were scrambling for approaches and by default globalist policies creeped in. Tyrannus failed at cockup and failed at conspiracy; de facto we witnessed the effects of each.
Something kind of patronising about ‘conspiracy-minded friends’. You have constructed a mind prison for yourself with that kind of language, which is precisely why the only explanation you can think of is the only explanation you can think of. Read Bobby Kennedy’s book. It might not be the last word, but it certainly shows how these things are co-ordinated, planned, executed. No conspiracy in sight. Just the way the world works. People get together with goals and try to achieve them. Why is that so hard to believe?
It’s really a pathetic version of self censorship. Once that bridge is crossed you lose access to all the income from “comment Pieces” in the various lamesteam papers.
Well put.
Excellent point loop. Take for example the incredible scene in RFK’s book where Gates meets Fauci in his library with the awesome dome and they link pinkies and agree to fuck the world over together. If that’s not a ‘conspiracy’ then the word is meaningless. But go on, blame status anxiety, or something.
Loop, you’re killing me with these comments. Ok, I’ll keep going. RFK demonstrates with scrupulous detail and more footnotes than you will ever look up exactly how the Simulation/Roleplaying/Scenario industry evolved after 2000 to create co-ordinated policy responses to these kind of events. There’s your conspiracy, right there, in plain sight. And by conspiracy, I mean, conspiracy, people getting together in rooms to plan preferred outcomes. I absolutely challenge you Toby to read RFK then write a piece about how there are no conspiracies, none, zip, nada or at least none that you can think of.
Those of us who can see clearly what’s happening find The Great Reset (the conspirators’ words, not ours) not “exciting,” as Toby writes, but really horrifying! If the criminals who hatched this conspiracy and all their eager accomplices who are carrying it out ever come to face justice, that will be exciting.
Could be in “Godfather IV “- if the film is ever to be made
But as I suggest below, globalist policies are not necessarily imposed by those with globalist convictions. So is it still conspiracy if the leadership just went along with whatever the tea boy put together, out of blase laziness?
“Going along with” had people hanged at Nuremberg!
Tea boys never get the blame! They merely resign…
You’re absolutely right but I’m giving him the benefit of the doubt; he needs to be careful with his words and not alienate his audience. I think he understands that there are, let’s say, plots at work.
My experience is that they flatly refuse to read anything which contradicts their cosy narrative – they have such a shock coming!
They cling to the rubber dummy of the BBC and the “Daily Mail”.
Chew on this:
https://spanishnewstoday.com/anticovid-chewing-gum-to-hit-the-market-in-spain_1717199-a.html
There’s money to be made out there….
DM reported this being trialled weeks ago – Dr Michael Mosely’s column on Sat.
There is now such a massive covid industry built up around all of the BS that there is no way it will be going away any time soon. Too many people stand to lose too much money. Too many contracts to be awarded with – possibly – backhanders to benefit from.
Are there really any political opponents when all sides sing from the same hymnsheet?
What did he know of the Midazolam euthenasia policy in care homes?
Enquiring minds want to know.
What’s the difference between Blair, Cameron, Macron, Trudeau and Varadkar?
No, I don’t know either.
Their names are all synonyms of cunt?
“I believe the reason the Government imposed three lockdowns – and countless restrictions in between – was because it calculated it was better to be seen to be doing something to try to suppress the virus rather than just ‘letting it rip’.”
Nope. Totally disagree.
Lockstep Western lockdowns were designed to destroy the life blood of economies, small and medium sized businesses.
As I’ve already said several times this week, they met because they weren’t afraid, and they weren’t afraid because they knew there was nothing to fear. Or almost nothing. They were afraid that people would die, and they’d be blamed for not doing something. Lockdown was something, so they did it. But they had no intention of abiding by it themselves, because they knew, deep down, that it was all theatre.
Nice try, Toby, but no cigar.
Does Toby actually think Boris had any say in the lockdown ?
This was all started by the Chinese (and jumped on by other world leaders who hated him) to get rid of Trump. Much to their surprise, and thanks to the massive voter fraud at the US election, their plan worked; after that, and seeing how easy it was to control 95% of the plebs, they found it (are finding it) hard to let it go. Most governments have now given themselves new powers to combat any emergency, so how soon before the next emergency has them flexing their power-crazed muscles again? You only have to look south of the equator to see how some leaders are relishing their new powers. imho
Next question – given that the people at the party chose to ignore their own advice on partying and presumably travel, are we really to believe that they have all been jabbed?
probab only with saline. I don’t think you are going to see Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and their like dropping dead with myocarditis any time soon.
Well, I suppose they have proved that they can organise a p×ss-up pretty well anywhere.
I think this is a fair analysis, particularly of the motives of the opposition and the other anti-Conservative parties who have demanded more restrictions rather than hold the government to account. It was never to protect the public, only a hope of blaming the government for infections and deaths. How sad for them that results have been worse in Scotland and Wales.
I was a nurse during the pandemic. The hospital was empty from March to June 2020. What i did see however was increased admissions for drug and alcohol abuse. Eating disorders skyrocketed and while I didn’t deal with suicides we know they increased. on one occasion we had to secure a room to stop a girl from cutting herself open to release the calories from her blood stream.
Patients we’re collapsing at home on the floor starving to death because no one visited them anymore. All the elderly that fell down the stairs and died from dehydration. The people who had heart attacks and were found dead a week later. People who had strokes and couldn’t crawl to the phone so they died alone on the floor.
I can’t believe our government partied, celebrated, danced and laughed while our vulnerable died alone. The idea that they “had to do something” doesn’t cut it.
Don’t just do something, stand there!
A lady I knew, in her early 40s, fell down stairs. She was taken to hospital, she was disorientated and being sick. Doctors did a quick examination and sent her home within a few hours. Her mother found her dead the following morning.
I would guess it’s more banal. It is more like the smoker who knows he’s risking lung cancer and supports anti smoking restrictions but can’t resist just this once when the situation is tempting.
LOL! Unless the smoker was just following the science…
ironically, didn’t the science show that smokers were less likely to die from covid?
Contract, I believe
I can see it now: Smoke twenty a day! Save RNHS!
Just this once?
The “parties” are in well over double figures now – I’m losing count, so, likely is the fabled Sue Gray who is supposed to do the inquiry into them. There are parties coming out of the woodwork on an almost daily basis – so many of them that I don’t see her managing to get her report out by Christmas.
It wasn’t “just this once”
I agree – but my hypothetical smoker keeps telling himself “just this once” or “this is a special case” and as a result does it multiple times. We are good at fooling ourselves.
And my point is – how many parties? they told themselves “just this once” and then went on to have party after party after party
Hmm, I believe Toby dilutes his case by referring to the wholesale horrors of the last two years as “these scandalls.”
Untold deaths and miseries are “scandals?”
And it ain’t over.
You’re in denial TY
Indeed. As normal, you’re largely right.
I’m reminded of the Iraq War. Even with significant opposition at the time of invasion, it took years (and a steady drip of injured and dead British soldiers arriving home) for opinion to decisively turn against the war.
The complexities of covid make it much less likely opinion will ever decidedly turn against the lockdowns. I suspect we will never really get the satisfaction of seeing our side widely vindicated in the forum of public opinion. Unfortunately it’s just too complicated for the average joe to care or think about. Instead they’ll focus on the hypocrisy of the charlatans we have as political leaders. Democracy is in a sorry state in our country. It would be better to introduce a merit based system to determine who can and cannot vote. Or perhaps skip the whole edifice of election and instead control everything through a direct system of online voting to replace Parliament. Representative democracy is not required now modern telecoms can provide every man voting at home on every issue. Screw those blow-hard MPs. They serve us badly.
Oh dear, how sad, never mind….
https://www.marketwatch.com/articles/moderna-novavax-vaccine-stocks-supreme-court-51642165803?mod=mw_latestnews
Why, Global Theatre, Agenda’s, Funding, Money……
Judge them by their actions and not their words. Thus their actions have confirmed what those with an IQ above a beer mat already knew – the ‘pandemic’ was over in Spring 2020.
I don’t care if they were having parties, it’s the rank hypocrisy of it all and I would quite like to know who were at these parties?
And by the way, who in their right mind would follow any more restrictions now?
@Toby – Just to respond to your hypothesis regarding the thinking that may have gone on in the heads of Boris Johnson et al, without going into the question particularly deeply: the idea could also be posited that they thought something like this: assume p=0.001% that a person who hangs around in a room with others will die “of Covid”; there are 100 of us, so if we have a party once in a while then p=0.1% that one of us will die, or the expected death rate = 0.001 persons, cf. the actuarial risk of dying from crossing the road or snorting badly cut cocaine or whatever – nothing to worry about, so uncork those bottles; there are 50m plebs, so if we let those smelly unwashed bastards hang out in rooms with each other for 200 times as long, then the expected death rate = 50m x 0.001% x 200 = 100000, -> bad publicity; conclusion: ban the smellies from socialising, and let’s have some parties when they’re not looking. I don’t think that’s how they thought at all. The British ruling class is fanatically Malthusian, so they definitely DON’T think like this. But it makes a bit… Read more »