Covid Vaccines: One Death per 8,000 People in Iceland, Serious Adverse Events 800-FOLD Higher Than With Earlier Vaccine Withdrawn on Safety Grounds

In 1976 the U.S. had a swine flu outbreak. Vaccine development was immediately started and Congress approved a liability exemption for the manufacturers at the request of President Gerald Ford. Then a mass vaccination campaign was kicked off. As Gerald Posner describes in his book Pharma – Greed, Lies and the Poisoning of America, it later turned out there never was any swine flu outbreak. Instead, one soldier in an army barracks in Texas caught a respiratory disease that killed him, but it was not a virus, but bacteria originating from contaminated water, a disease known as Legionella or Legionnaires’ disease. However, before the truth came out, over 40 million people had been vaccinated.

On October 12th 1976, the New York Times reported that the vaccination programme had been halted in nine states after three elderly patients had died following the flu shot. A direct link had not been established though.

On December 17th the programme was put on hold nationwide as 94 cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome were being investigated. Fifty-one of the patients had received the vaccine, the New York Times reported on December 17th 1976.

At that time, as no actual swine flu cases had yet been verified, the lack thereof contributed to the decision. However, as reported by the New York Times, this was not the main reason:

The decision to suspend the swine flu program was announced in Washington by Dr. Theodore Cooper, Assistant Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare. Dr. Cooper said that he was acting “in the interests of safety of the public, in the interest of credibility, and in the interest of the practice of good medicine”.

Now to Iceland. In the winter of 2019-2020, around 70,000 people were vaccinated against influenza. Nine cases of adverse events were reported, none of them serious, the Icelandic Medicines Agency confirmed to me via email on November 1st 2021.

On January 12th 2022, when just under 290,000 people had been vaccinated against COVID-19 (out of a population of 370,000), 5,968 cases of adverse events had been reported. This is a massive 160-fold increase per million against the 2019 figures.

268 cases were classified as serious. 171 patients needed hospitalisation, and out of those, 38 cases were classified as life-threatening. 35 deaths had been reported. This compares to 39 deaths reported with Covid to date.

Classification of serious adverse effects from COVID-19 vaccination. Source: Icelandic Medicines Agency

It is generally expected to have one to two cases of serious adverse events for every million vaccinated against influenza. The number of reported serious adverse events is thus 500 to 1,000 times higher per million among those vaccinated against Covid. We know of course, not all reported adverse events turn out to have been caused by the vaccine; in many cases a different cause can be established. We also know from previous research that many cases never get reported. I know of a few myself. But if we assume all those cases are due to the vaccination and there are none unreported, we have a 500-1,000 fold increase. If half of the cases can be shown to have other causes (assuming they were being investigated, which isn‘t the case) we would have a 250-500 fold increase. Even if 90% were due to other causes we would still have a 50-100 fold increase.

As we’ve seen, in 1976 it was about safety and good medicine. Remember, when they abandoned the vaccination programme they had vaccinated 40 million people and received a meagre 51 reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome in the vaccinated. That is one report in every 800,000 vaccinated. And those reports had not even been verified. But they stopped. This is what you do if you care about safety and good medicine.

Now, what were the Icelandic vaccination figures again? 260 reports of serious adverse evens per 290,000 vaccinated? That’s one report of a serious health issue per 1,000 people vaccinated. So we have 800 reports per 800,000 in 2021, against one per 800,000 in 1976 – an 800-fold increase. And remember, those vaccines are not only being offered to people who are in actual danger should they catch COVID-19. They are offered to everyone, down to the age of five – to people who have absolutely no need for them, and now even against a new strain, for which they don‘t even prevent infection, as has been demonstrated already. And the authorities use restrictions and mandates in order to force people to accept them.

Still, we‘ve known all along those vaccines are not designed to prevent infection, and it became clear months ago they will never give us herd immunity; they simply reduce the risk for vaccinated individuals of serious illness. We already know the huge difference in COVID-19 lethality by age-group.

So, what happened to safety and good medicine? Why are no questions being asked when we witness such a huge surge in reports of adverse events?

This is a question that will be asked after the panic subsides.

Thorsteinn Siglaugsson is an economist who lives in Iceland. This article was first published on his blog.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

67 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
steve_z
4 years ago

nice article. I love these things being put into historical context. If you don’t learn from history – you repeat it etc.

TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
4 years ago
Reply to  steve_z

And remember those who try and change the past are trying to repeat it.

loopDloop
loopDloop
4 years ago

No disclaimer this time DS? You guys going soft? More articles like this and people might start thinking this site is antivax.

Jonny S.
4 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

I think it’s now clear that antivax is pro science and should be referred to as such.

J4mes
4 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

This site has come a long way from the early days of them being “pro-vax” and I applaud those involved for being brave enough to take that journey.

However, we’re not talking about vaccination. We’re talking about experimental gene therapy. The medical definition of vaccine changed when this thing was foisted upon us.

Why should they need disclaimers? Why should they not report the truth about this hazardous injection? Do you dispute the findings in this article?

loopDloop
loopDloop
4 years ago
Reply to  J4mes

13 downvotes. Guess I had my irony settings too high. Why should they need disclaimers? Why should they not report the truth about this hazardous injection? Do you dispute the findings in this article? Ok, my point here is that every single month when the Yellow Card figures are released, DS post a long laborious disclaimer insisting that drawing attention to this shitshow of death and destruction should not be taken in any way as any kind of critique of how wonderful vaccines are, the great boon of medical science, etc etc. Those disclaimers piss me off, because how could anyone read those lists of vaccine injuries and not realise something is terribly terribly wrong. The only possible sentient response to those Yellow Card reports is horror, so I have never understood why DS have not grasped this, and instead played it scrupulously non-partisan. So no, there should not be disclaimers on the monthly Yellow Card articles, or this one. I should have pointed out I was being sarcastic. Of course they should report the truth, and no I don’t dispute the findings in this article, it’s what everyone has been talking about since the vaccines were released. So just… Read more »

PoshPanic
4 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

I got the irony and didn’t down tick you, but I do think this site has had to navigate a minefield and done it well. It’s almost certain the articles appearing here are having some impact on the narrative. I think that means they sometimes have to cover their arses in order to fight another day.

CovidiousAlbion
4 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

“Those disclaimers piss me off” – Maybe DS had its “irony settings too high”!

John Dee
4 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

Couldn’t we celebrate that we’ve arrived on the same page, along the lines of:

“…. there will be more joy in heaven over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine righteous ones who do not need to repent.”

J4mes
4 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

Very good. Your irony settings were set to eleven 😉

PoshPanic
4 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

This article is more proof that the real antivaxxers, are the ones pushing mass vaccination

artfelix
4 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

I think some people might have missed the sarcasm here!

Mark
4 years ago

In 1976 the U.S. had a swine flu outbreak.”

The original “Swine Flu SNAFU”

BJs Brain is Missing
4 years ago

The evidence continues to mount up.

Which true leader, which true individual, which true person with courage and integrity will call a halt to it all? Who will end the carnage? It looks like it will be you and me.

beornwulf
beornwulf
4 years ago

What we need is an articulate and well-connected 14 year old Scandi kid with a loud mouth.

Freecumbria
4 years ago

Thanks Thorsteinn. Excellent and clear article.

JamesM
JamesM
4 years ago

It would be nice to see the BBC, The Times and The Sunday Times covering this story… but I’m not holding my breath. The truth will out in the end, though.

Dodgy Geezer
Dodgy Geezer
4 years ago

 they simply reduce the risk for vaccinated individuals of serious illness.

I hear this statement a lot. Can someone give me a reference to ANY study showing this to be true?

Tee Ell
4 years ago
Reply to  Dodgy Geezer

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2107058

Among participants with RT-PCR–confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, only 25% of those who were partially or fully vaccinated reported febrile symptoms, as compared with 63% of those who were unvaccinated”

I’m not arguing this is definitive. I think there’s more to it and I won’t be getting vaccinated. Just sharing because it was requested 🙂

John Dee
4 years ago
Reply to  Tee Ell

Interesting, but written some seven months ago, which must be at least two strains of covid ago. I wonder if the results would be the same if the study were to be repeated now?

scepticScot
scepticScot
4 years ago
Reply to  Tee Ell

From WebMD … “A fever can help your immune system fight infections in two ways. A higher temperature in the body speeds up how cells work, including the ones that fight illness. They can respond to invading germs faster. Also, higher body temperatures make it harder for bacteria and viruses to thrive in your body.”
Feverishness as a symptom suggests a properly working immune system!

GlassHalfFull
4 years ago
Reply to  Tee Ell

The paper you have linked to proving the experimental jab works is flawed. “After the exclusion of 1147 participants who had laboratory documentation of SARS-CoV-2 infection before the start of the study period” Which means they deliberately left out of the study all those who had naturally acquired immunity from prior infection. The study itself also states “This study also has several limitations.” And they go on to list 7 problems with it. Although the experimental jab may stop someone “unvaccinated” with NO natural immunity testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 for a short period of time it doesn’t say whether there would be any symptoms of Covid or whether there would be any long term risk from the experimental jab. In other words why would a fit healthy person of working age run the risk of Original Antigenic Sin, Antibody Dependent Enhancement, Vaccine Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome etc. plus all the other possible side effects from the experimental jab including Myocarditis to stop Covid which may have no symptoms or just a sniffle? They would be better off catching a non-existent or mild case of Covid and have natural immunity than run the risk of “vaccine damage”. I know we are all against… Read more »

John Dee
4 years ago
Reply to  Dodgy Geezer

Unless the entire machinery of government had been corrupted, it would be difficult to deny that the vaccine shots did result in fewer hospitalisations and deaths, at least at the start of the campaign.
My own attitude has always been one of scepticism at the ‘temporary authorisations’ for the vaxes, the total indemnity for the manufacturers, and the observation that even the most virulent strains of covid would have been seen off by the vast majority of the non-vulnerable. All of that magnified by the speed and universality of the denials of Wuhan lab origin for covid. And the cherry on top was the lack of knowledge about any long-term effects of the jabs (predating the realisation that multiple top-ups ad infinitum would likely be required).
I would never have tried to dissuade someone from taking the jabs, but I have been flummoxed by the lack of curiosity about them exhibited by some of the brightest people I know.

Rowan
Rowan
4 years ago
Reply to  John Dee

The government is utterly corrupt. Those who work in the bureaucratic chain are paid to believe that the Covid vaccines result in fewer hospitalisations and deaths, while the evidence to the contrary continues to pile up.

huxleypiggles
4 years ago
Reply to  Dodgy Geezer

The statement is BS.

Rowan
Rowan
4 years ago
Reply to  Dodgy Geezer

No they won’t be able to do that, that claim was plucked out the air and is simply a load of bollocks.

beornwulf
beornwulf
4 years ago
Reply to  Dodgy Geezer

Whenever I hear someone say that I immediately think of Mandy Rice-Davies. ‘Well they would say that, wouldn’t they’.

Evison1
4 years ago

Excellent article, thank you.

Evison1
4 years ago

I suppose the other question is whether All Cause Deaths have fallen since the vaccination roll-out, as more lives should have been ‘saved’ from Covid than lost to the vaccine……?

TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
4 years ago
Reply to  Evison1

The pfiser study suggested that for each COVID victim saved 3 would die from heart disease if all are jabbed.

Rowan
Rowan
4 years ago

And Pfizer fiddled with the figures incessantly, so things are likely even worse.

Rowan
Rowan
4 years ago
Reply to  Evison1

We were told the other day that for the latter part of 2021 the all cause death numbers are up by 40% for those in the 18- 64 age group. The increase was not caused by Covid. Hmm.

Proveritate
4 years ago

Maybe the vaccines are giving a certain amount of protection against serious disease, but whereas in a clinical trial you might want to show efficacy against a control group taking a placebo (i.e. no active agent), in the real world it is unethical not to give early treatment for those infected. So, the comparison is being artificially skewed by denying the unvaccinated early treatment. To give a similar example, being able to call 999 and have a fire tender sent to extinguish a small fire before it burns the house down is the equivalent of early treatment if you catch an infectious disease: quickly treat the problem before it becomes a catastrophe. But let us say that the government rolled out an asbestos plan (which will kill some people by inducing lung disease) to make houses slightly more fire retardant, but to increase take up instructed the fire service not to attend any domestic blazes (like the government tells GPs not to treat the Covid sick). Would it be a fair comparison to say how efficacious the asbestos plan was because it prevented some houses from burning down when fire tenders had been prevented from attending blazes? Surely the only… Read more »

cornubian
4 years ago
Reply to  Proveritate

I agree, but we are talking about medical scams operated by some of the biggest criminal organisations in the world – and thats just the governments!

JohnK
4 years ago
Reply to  cornubian

This place is quite useful: https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/media-resources/the-pfizer-inoculations-for-covid-19-more-harm-than-good-2/ The cure is worse than the disease, in effect – and it describes what’s gone wrong with the development process in the drug trade.

loopDloop
loopDloop
4 years ago
Reply to  Proveritate

They don’t even test the vaccines against placebos. They test them against the adjuvant. The whole thing is corrupt from top to bottom.

John001
John001
4 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

I think in the USA they tested products against saline, following legal action by Del Bigtree’s organisation. I don’t know about the UK or EU, i.e. the AZ might have been tested against adjuvant.

TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
4 years ago
Reply to  Proveritate

Or budesonide

Common asthma treatment reduces need for hospitalisation in COVID-19 patients, study suggests | University of Oxford

The STOIC study found that inhaled budesonide given to patients with COVID-19 within seven days of the onset of symptoms also reduced recovery time. Budesonide is a corticosteroid used in the long-term management of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Findings from the phase 2 randomised study, which was supported by the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), were published on the medRxiv pre-print server.
The findings from 146 people – of whom half took 800 micrograms of the medication twice a day and half were on usual care – suggests that inhaled budesonide reduced the relative risk of requiring urgent care or hospitalisation by 90% in the 28-day study period. 

cornubian
4 years ago

These incidents are not ‘vaccine adverse events’. They are criminal injuries received from coerced experimental medical procedures.

Emerald Fox
4 years ago
Reply to  cornubian

Never mind – someone here said that if they come across Van Tam in Nottingham they are going to quietly mutter something nasty under their breath. That will show him!!

amanuensis
4 years ago

This is lining up to become a serious disaster.

John001
John001
4 years ago
Reply to  amanuensis

I think any disaster is serious! Maybe the scale goes roughly as follows –

Irritation
Issue
Problem
Big problem
Disaster
Catastrophe (asteroid hits London-type event).

This seems to be shaping up to be worse than Thalidomide or Vioxx. Vioxx killed 100,000 in the USA. I don’t know if it was sold in other countries; if it was, deaths would be greater.

What’s worse, the medical-industrial complex will profit from this episode. Anyone who develops a chronic or acute illness earlier than they otherwise would will have to pay for extra medical care and drugs.

Well, that’s what happens in the USA or any other country with a private medical system and a sort of free market. In the UK, where NHS spending has basically been rationed, diseases like cancer will probably crowd out more minor conditions, so people with those conditions won’t get treatment and will just suffer.

crisisgarden
4 years ago

When will the ‘vaccine’ dam burst?

CovidiousAlbion
4 years ago

Strange that almost all the “vaccine” deaths are of elderly people.

Life is a journey; are we there yet?
Life is a journey; are we there yet?
4 years ago

Save us now have collated over one thousand papers showing harm caused as a result of Covid injections https://www.saveusnow.org.uk/covid-vaccine-scientific-proof-lethal/ I am at a loss to understand how the authorities can ignore the evidence when there is so much of it.

John Dee
4 years ago

‘I am at a loss to understand how the authorities…’
The explanation is ‘determination not to admit fault’.
I point you at the recent garden-parties debacle…

Bolloxed Britannia
Bolloxed Britannia
4 years ago

“So what happened to safety and good medicine”…. It’s been replaced by a dark dark evil that’s captured Government, it’s agencies, medicine, science and media. It’s not a conspiracy theory (if you do the research) to suggest that this evil and it’s acolytes have a malevolant agenda, part of which is to rid the planet of billions of people, the vaccine is the means to an end!

iane
iane
4 years ago

Well, that is one theory. Many of us here believe it is about power and money.

milesahead
milesahead
4 years ago
Reply to  iane

Many people here are, sadly, mistaken.

PoshPanic
4 years ago

This just in from todays court hearing on child vaccination…

ONS admit increase in deaths in 15-19 Yr old males since vaccination but refuse to reveal the details and the judge supported this. NOBODY is looking at this data with your children in mind.

https://twitter.com/beverleyturner/status/1481679760761577475?s=20

welshsceptic
welshsceptic
4 years ago

In addition, wasn’t there the swine flu of 2009 which was similarly sexed up and for which a vaccine, Pandemrix, was pushed hard in some countries? The drug turned out to be unsafe too and was withdrawn. But does anyone know a good summary of what happened in more detail?

John001
John001
4 years ago
Reply to  welshsceptic

There was a long report to the Council of Europe on the scandal, by Dr Wolfgang Wodarg and the late Paul Flynn MP (Newport West).

There were also several BMJ articles. Searching for above words and H1N1, WHO, 2009, etc should find them all. HTH.

welshsceptic
welshsceptic
4 years ago
Reply to  John001

Thanks a lot, John001!

realarthurdent
4 years ago
Reply to  John001

Also a news report on Channel 4 News back in the days when Jon Snow was an investigative journalist.
·       CHANNEL 4 NEWS EXPOSES THE 2009 SWINE FLU SCANDAL https://www.bitchute.com/video/Wvo57rItOUP3/

CovidiotAntiMasker
CovidiotAntiMasker
4 years ago

Just idiotic mumbo jumbo according to Blair/Boris.

Doom Slayer
4 years ago

Ive heard the likes of Farage and Mike Graham on occasion calling for an honest discussion on adverse effects, but thats pretty much as far as it goes. They never have it probably because of ofcom. If they are so safe lets broadcast some eminent scientists on both sides to go through the figures and explain them to the nation. They know it is widely accepted that the figures are completely wrong, they are a massive underestimate.

GimpbusterMSc
GimpbusterMSc
4 years ago
Reply to  Doom Slayer

yep, there’s definitely a vaccines are great public face on talk radio. I do like J H-B’s output but when she starts prattling on about safe vaccines- ARRRGGGHHH!She had some ex-military type on today called Hamish (whatever) prattling on about how the unvaxxed unwashed should be isolated to protect everyone else. Of course, realising the stupidity of his psition he refused to say how this should be done. Interestingly she’s not expressing much interest in being boosted.

I’d suspect Mike graham would have been a refusnick if his elderly mother lived here instead of the U.S.A. but again, various fools spouting about vaccines are great go unchallenged.
the Collins guy doing the afternoon show doesn’t seem particularlky inclined to get boostered though again , he’s a vaccines are safe spouter.
i strongly suspect he might lurk on these pages

beornwulf
beornwulf
4 years ago
Reply to  GimpbusterMSc

Yes, that would be Col. Hamish de Btetton-Gordon who had a letter published in Sunday’s Telegraph. In this letter he stated that people, to quote, ‘should either be vaccinated or made to shield’;.The tone of the letter sounded to me like compulsion. His letter finished ‘Good on you, Australia’. Need I say more? The man’s a complete plonker.

CovidiotAntiMasker
CovidiotAntiMasker
4 years ago
Reply to  GimpbusterMSc

Yes, must be Talk radio policy , she should be ashamed of herself , lately always pushing the jabs, never mentioning the side effects.

GimpbusterMSc
GimpbusterMSc
4 years ago

anyone on turning that Icelandic into english? When I clicked on the English it just bought up their home page and I couldn’t navigate to an English version of that page

Horse
Horse
4 years ago
Reply to  GimpbusterMSc

Google Translate is very good these days and can take quite large chunks of text. Also, try Deepl – that’s even better.

LonePatriot
LonePatriot
4 years ago

The ongoing COVID-19 nonsense here in the United States exists solely and exclusively because our governments have failed to use the correct treatment. They used so-called “vaccines” when Japan has just proven, in less than ONE MONTH, that Ivermectin can wipe out the disease. IVM was awarded the Nobel prize for medicine in 2015. One of the 3 most important drugs in human history: Aspirin, Penicillin, and Ivermectin. Get your Ivermectin today while you still can! https://ivmpharmacy.com

David Beaton
David Beaton
4 years ago

Genocide then?

Horse
Horse
4 years ago

If you apply this figure to the percentage of British people over 12 who have had two doses, then you get 5600 “vaccine” deaths. And we know from recent NHS figures that the virus has killed (with and of) 3700 people under 65 in England and Wales with no comorbidities. It’s looking increasingly like the “vaccine” is killing more people than the virus and that a serious crime against humanity has taken place.

scepticScot
scepticScot
4 years ago

.

swedenborg
4 years ago

A country with as many deaths from the vaccine as from the disease,having maximum vaccinations incl incredibly high uptake booster and in the omikron wave one of the highest infection rate in the world.And the booster don’t help hospitalisation.Only one solution now very secure with omikron and minimal risk.Stop everything incl.vaccines

FI_H7TnXMAc5xCP.png
Nigel_N
4 years ago

This is a question that will be asked after the panic subsides.

This question will not be asked for a very long time, because we now have a culture of “something must be done”.
I have a family member who has been on antibiotics for months, clearly a treatment that is not working.
The Guardian yesterday had an anti-anti-vaxxer piece, where the author happily declared that she had put an end-of-life cancer patient on invasive life support.Since when was this part of patient care?