News Round-Up
- “Pupils ‘vilified’ if they don’t take Covid tests or wear masks in class” – The Telegraph reports on a call for a crackdown on schools that threaten to banish children to back of the class or deny them lessons if they don’t follow the rules.
- “London’s Covid cases and admissions peak without overwhelming NHS, figures suggest” – Boris Johnson may have been right to avoid further curbs, as seven-day case rates have been falling in the capital since December 26th, reports the Telegraph.
- “Plan B is working in England, insists minister” – “I don’t see any reason why we need to change”, says vaccines minister ahead of cabinet meeting, the Independent reports. But the Royal College of Nursing and other unions have other ideas.
- “Covid: More hospital trusts declare ‘critical incident’ over staff shortages” – At least eight trusts have taken steps to protect services in the past week, amid staff shortages, reports the BBC.
- “Heads warn of weeks of Omicron disruption in English schools” – Staff absences mean some pupils face return to remote learning, amid doubts over advice to combine classes, reports the Telegraph.
- “Chinese-style mass testing must end if we’re ever to learn to live with Covid” – “The mass testing of perfectly healthy people would have been considered insane just a few years ago, yet is now a national orthodoxy. Lining up children before they go to school to have a swab stuck up their noses to check for a disease that they probably have not got – and which will affect them very mildly if they do have it – is not only bonkers, it is inhuman, as is requiring they wear masks in the classroom.” Philip Johnston back on strong sceptical form in the Telegraph.
- “Modellers are heading for a showdown” – To make Covid models actually useful for guiding policy their authors urgently need to include economists or other experts in behaviour, writes Andrew Lilico in the Telegraph.
- “The problem with ‘vaccine equity’” – Having the jabs is just one part of the equation, writes Ross Clark in the Spectator.
- “Is this the most bizarre anti-vaccine conspiracy theory yet?” – The Telegraph‘s Michael Deacon on the tiny flaw in the supposed plan to massacre the vaccinated but leave the rebellious unvaccinated alive.
- “Dr. McCullough: Outpatient Treatments for COVID-19 Have Been Suppressed” – Peter McCullough tells the Epoch Times that the public should question why governments and public health officials around the world have put little to no emphasis on outpatient treatments in their effort to fight the COVID-19 virus.
- “They Said They Would Slow the Spread” – Jeffrey A. Tucker at the Brownstone Institute sees the current surges across America as marking both the end of the pandemic and the spectacular failure of the coercive state public health policies designed to prevent them.
- “Covid and mass formation psychosis” – Alexander Adams in Bournbrook Magazine on the origin of the concept and how it is playing out in the pandemic.
- “Whitty and Van-Tam, knighted for defending the indefensible” – The Government medics have had “the unenviable task of defending the indefensible as front men for a Government in the grip of a massively powerful wave of global hysteria”, writes Neville Hodgkinson in TCW.
- “Why masks could be on planes forever” – Just like the 100ml liquids rule and other security rituals, the mask directive feels more like theatre than a proven safety measure, writes Oliver Smith in a depressing piece for the Telegraph.
- “Pandemic is stunting babies’ development due to stress on mothers” – A U.S. study finds that infants born during the crisis scored lower on motor and social skills than pre-Covid children, the Telegraph reports.
- “Yuzhou in Central China announces lockdown after recording three asymptomatic cases in two days” – Almost unbelievably extreme response from the authorities, reported in the Global Times, so it must be true.
- “Open Letter to Members of the House of Lords re Vaccine Mandates for NHS and CQC-regulated Healthcare Workers” – The latest open letter from the UKMFA, fully referenced and judiciously worded as usual.
- “Heat Pumps v Hydrogen: (Scalded Or Burned!!)” – According to a new study from the European Consumer Organisation, the cost of hydrogen from electrolysis is more than four times the cost of natural gas, meaning average annual bills would rise from £375 to £1,830, writes Paul Homewood.
- “New Study: Pacific And Indian Ocean Sea Levels Rising ‘Much Slower Than Climate Model Predictions’” – Over 700 low-lying islands in the Pacific and Indian Oceans have coasts that have been stable to expanding in size since the 1980s, writes Kenneth Richard in NoTricksZone.
- “Is this the end of progressive America?” – Multiple fronts of resistance are taking shape, writes Joel Kotkin in UnHerd.
- “The Eternal Away Game” – Watch Bournbrook‘s S.D. Wickett on the challenges of being outnumbered and what Twitter’s new regime means for online dissent from progressive orthodoxy.
- “‘White Coats for Black Lives’ and the Transformation of Medical Schools” – A national organisation of medical students has successfully pressured their schools to embrace radical identity politics, reports City Journal.
- “AOC and the self-absorbed left” – Feminism has taught too many women that narcissism is desirable, argues Amber Athey in the Spectator.
- “Plight of the white male student” – “He knew before he called that I would sympathise, but talking was still risky. If our conversation got out we both could be targeted by the fabricated allegations of bigotry and extremism that await those who dissent. Other students, unsurprisingly, are reluctant to complain, however discreetly.” Mark Campion on the risks of dissent in TCW.
- “Ex-ITV boss attacks the craven MSM” – Watch former head of ITV News Mark Sharman in an interview with ex-BBC journalist Anna Brees ask “when did it become the [Government-appointed] regulator’s job to determine debate on Government policy” or discourage investigation of alternative views?
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Who is going to be stupid enough to entrust their lives and health to pharma-enthralled doctors in the future, let alone CRT-enthralled doctors? The wheels are coming off the medical racket and none of us will benefit.
What has absolutely been confirmed for me these last two years is the paucity of knowledge in so many of our medical staff.
There are some good people and I have been fortunate at times to be treated by them but by God a lot of the rest are seriously substandard.
Drs with a poor knowledge of medicines, who don’t understand “vaccines” or transmission or infections.
I used to revere NHS staff. Unfortunately, I now largely despise them. None seem to understand what CPD is or means. The worst of them are serious health hazards.
Known this for a long time, having worked in healthcare.
Many staff are merely drones (although they can be very good at basic care) and if they told me it was raining I would go and check for myself.
Absolutely right. Got my fingers burned with that some years ago, when I was seriously ill with something else (nothing to do with viruses). Some of them are on top of the job, but many more try to do their best and don’t really know what they’re doing. What I did come across was a strong tendency to do something based on the visible symptoms, without proper understanding of the real cause. Been there, done that, got the T-shirt.
“ What I did come across was a strong tendency to do something based on the visible symptoms, without proper understanding of the real cause.” What I was taught on my nursing advanced practice course was: presenting complaint, History of presenting complaint, past medical history including any medications and allergies, basic observations as appropriate (colour, temperature, pulse, respiration rate, breathing effort, use of ancillary muscles etc). Systemic examination from head to toe as appropriate cranial nerves, throat, cervical lymph nodes, chest, abdomen, pelvis and all four limbs, depending on history. Don’t forget that physicians in hospital are either specialist consultants, specialist registrars, both of which have specific areas of expertise and anything outside of that they cannot handle, or they are FY2 or FY1 newly qualified on different rotations. A GP is by definition is general, and will immediately go to the presenting complaint and work from there as they have only 10 minutes, on the other hand nurse practitioners are more likely to look at the whole person, as that is the nursing model. To demonstrate the way doctors specialise I will relate an incident that happened whilst working in A&E. A young man was blue lighted into A&E… Read more »
“Don’t forget that physicians in hospital are either specialist consultants, specialist registrars, both of which have specific areas of expertise and anything outside of that they cannot handle, or they are FY2 or FY1 newly qualified on different rotations.”
This observation is absolutely crucial. A skilled role in medicine doesn’t necessarily imply all-round knowledge, and the best practitioners know when to back off and consult experts.
Even more pertinent is the lack of knowledge outside medicine, so that, despite some coverage of medical statistics in training, many professionals have no better idea than the general public about the probabilities relating to disease outside their speciality.
Dr. GOOGLE
Dr Google was the bane of my life when seeing patients, they invariably looked up their symptoms and read the causes. They then presented at urgent care with this diagnosis and demanding antibiotics or whatever. Only for us to diagnose a viral infection and antibiotics were not required. The other danger with search engines is that they can put the worst diagnoses first, so patients come in expecting to be told they need to go to hospital as they are at death’s door!
has served me surprisingly well for a long long time now
There are many root causes, but the main one seems to me to be that too many people are entering technical/scientific jobs without the prerequisite raw intelligence. That’s thanks to the inclusive university system where intelligence is no longer a barrier to entry. The intelligent people who could have been trained probably got relegated (by the secondary education system) to an Amazon warehouse and occupy their underused brains playing Xbox.
The right person for a job in science is someone who is given a fact and instinctively asks “why is that then”. The people that our education system favours are those that just say “okie dokie”, and recite given fact upon request.
No. ‘Twas always thus – people are, in general, more swayed by emotion and crowd pressures than by insight.
In future I intend to avoid killing zones, er, hospitals altogether, unless I’m crashing, and even that might be a judgement call.
Th daily Telegraph has a good example of this crime against humanity.
“Pupils ‘vilified’ if they don’t take Covid tests or wear masks in class” – The Telegraph reports on a call for a crackdown on schools that threaten to banish children to back of the class or deny them lessons if they don’t follow the rules.
***
When you are demonised for speaking the truth you are living in tyranny. Please come and join our friendly events.
Wednesday 5th January 5pm
Silent lighted walk behind one simple sign
“No More Lockdown”
Bring torches, candles and other lights
meet outside Town Hall, Wokingham RG40 1AP
Saturday 8th January 2pm – Marlow
Berks & Bucks Freedom Day
Higginson Park corner of High Street & Pound Lane
Marlow SL7 1NF
and get your boost of freedom!!
Stand in the Park Sundays 10am make friends, ignore the madness & keep sane
Wokingham – Howard Palmer Gardens Cockpit Path car park Sturges Rd RG40 2HD
Telegram http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell
For decades, schools have been plastered with sanctimonious posters proclaiming that they won’t countenance bullying, and boasting that all their pupils accept diversity.
Ha bloody ha.
Really? I must have missed something in my decades of involvement, then.
Pure fantasy.
I hope someone, somewhere, is making copies of these articles which try to make a case for lockdown based on NHS staff shortages.
The NHS will discriminately sack thousands of their staff without justification in April. The likes of the BBC will throw itself behind the sackings.
They need to be reminded what they were reporting only a few months earlier…
Interesting point. It doesn’t look as though the plan is to have scaled down the vilification of the unvaccinated by April.
Meanwhile across the Channel Emmanuel Macron wants to “get on the nerves” of the unvaccinated. Cf the “hostile environment” desired by Liam Byrne (Labour) and Theresa May (Tories).
Well… “get on the nerves” is a ludicrously mild translation of what Macron actually said, namely
which could be better rendered as
He’s trying to channel De Gaulle, maybe? (“La réforme, oui! La chie-en-lit, non!”) De Gaulle won the parliamentary election in June 1968 but resigned less than a year later. And we all know that “history has accelerated” since then.
Those were really, really shitty words.
He’ll. e eating them soon.
It is a great way to harden peoples’ resolution to resist.
Its being translated as ‘Piss off’. Totally cynical move to try to get the ‘thick as shit’ mob to vote for him. What a complete bastard.
UK NHS bed numbers 2000 = ~240k
UK NHS bed numbers 2022 = ~ 165k
UK Population 2000 = ~59,000,000
UK Population 2022 = ~68,497,907
So we’ve gained ~10 million population, and lost ~75k NHS beds in 20 years.
The NHS “Crisis” is nothing to do with Covid, it’s all down to Governments, from BOTH sides of the isle, Labour 1997-2010, Tory 2010-2022.
… which gives you one strand of why the government is blowing ‘crisis’ smoke.
They’ll ‘allow’ the wicked unvaxxed to slave through the winter before sacking them. Vile, loathsome, disgusting hypocrites.
Replacements arriving every day from France.
Anyway, my guess is that they will back down and allow ‘the unvaxxed’ staff to carry on working, or most of them will get jabbed before April.
Wait, surely you aren’t saying that expert “modellers” made predictions based on self-serving models of complex and only partially understood processes, ridiculously extrapolated the outputs, and then pretended that the results should be taken seriously as the basis for emergency enabling acts and the overriding of
dissentdenial?That could never happen.
After all, The Science would never allow it to be unchallenged, and the media watchdogs fearlessly speaking truth to power would expose it, and the hardheaded elected politicians would never allow themselves to be pushed around by mere technocrats and their obsessive hobby horses. Would they?
Then again, it does sound a bit familiar…
Sea level rise or fall is complicated by local factors. For example, due to isostatic rebound following the disappearance of the ice sheet from the last ice age, the south east of England is sinking whereas the north west of Scotland is rising. The study is therefore defective (except for purposes of confirmation bias)..
That very much depends on the consistency of the data across all the islands. You say local conditions but the Pacific Islands cover a vast range both in terms of geographical distance and geology – that’s like saying London and Istanbul have similar local conditions.
There are volcanic islands – like the Cook Islands – that will naturally sink as they drift, then there are coral atolls like Rennell Island in the Solomons that are formed by the raising and flexing of the lithospheric plate. Not all the Pacific islands are even on the same plate, and that’s before you consider the completely separate Indian Ocean islands.
I haven’t taken a close look at the data yet but a cursory glance suggests a consistency across very diverse conditions in 700 islands that is more than just coincidental. Perhaps it’s your own confirmation bias that’s being poked here?
This sounds exactly like the responses from covid fantasists to any study that casts doubt on their articles of faith. Instead of accepting that if their calamity fantasies had any real truth in them, we would see the signals clear as day in the data, they endlessly quibble about statistical details and insist that if you manipulate or select the data just right you will surely be able to see the effect they believe in.
Just as with covid, if there were any real truth to the climate alarmist fantasies that we’ve been exposed to now for decades, we’d know beyond any question by now.
And just as with covid, that’s not to deny that there might be underlying truth in the issue. There is a disease, just as there is an issue with pollution, and there might be some marginal impact from human activity on climate. It’s the alarmism, the false claims of an “emergency” to justify overriding norms and constraints, and the abuse of “modelling” that the two panics share, and it’s that alarmism that is catastrophically harmful to human society.
Sneerypants Michael Deacon pokes fun at somebody else’s name, but he omits to mention that he changed his own surname from Deake-Hedd. Then he scoffs at the “18 months” reference in the (admittedly poorly written) submission by Piers Corbyn et al to the ICC, so I looked it up. What the authors say is this There is good reason to assume that a large percentage of the UK population (and world population) is now at risk of either serious illness or death due to the recent mRNA ‘vaccines’. Animal studies conducted in 2012-2013 (Appendix 35 and 36) to test mRNA vaccines found most animals died within 2 weeks of receiving the treatment, this is equivalent to 1.5 years for humans. Those references are to this article Immunization with SARS Coronavirus Vaccines Leads to Pulmonary Immunopathology on Challenge with the SARS Virus and this one Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus which seem both to be the same article although I haven’t checked all the way through. The conclusions as stated in the abstract of the article are as follows: These SARS-CoV vaccines all induced antibody and protection against infection with SARS-CoV. However, challenge of mice given any of the vaccines led to occurrence of Th2-type… Read more »
Deacon’s rubbish was published just as many independent outlets (but not DS) are covering the US insurer’s claim of a 40% rise in deaths in 18-64 year olds above pre-pandemic levels.
Yes, the fact that the ‘Graph is paying any attention at all to this particularly extreme ( not usually worthy of their notice ) theory is almost a sign of stirrings of unease about those actuarial ( and other, VAERS etc ) stats.
And what Deacon’s “joke” is overlooking, or perhaps deliberately ignoring, is that the Great Reset plans, hopes and dreams were and are invented and promoted by people who believe in Eugenics, in improving the human species’ genetic stock ….
…. and it’s possible to argue that this would be the outcome if most of the vaxxed died, leaving the unvaxxed who saw through lies, asked questions, paid attention, looked at facts and reality, were not deceived by propaganda, etc ……
… “they”/the WEF etc maybe didn’t expect quite so many of the supposedly clever/”superior” professional classes etc to fall for the lies and so many of the “deplorables” to see through them, and resist! Surprised by which “branches give fruit”… lol
…. or maybe not.
Yes – why isn’t DS covering this? Toby – is there a column incoming?
Toby?
Hello?
This 2012 article is about SARS-Covid vaccines not SARS-Covid 2. None of the vaccines being evaluated were mRNA vaccines (I don’t think the technology existed then). Many SARS-Covid vaccines went into clinical trials – although none gained FDA approval. I think if most of the participants in the trials had died 18 months later it would have made the headlines!
No plan B is having a more devastating impact than lockdowns (if that’s possible) i’m not advocating for lockdowns, I’m asserting mass testing is harming the economy & healthcare.
Stop mass testing & the ludicrousness of making non-symptomatic people isolate. TESTING has been the root cause of this fraudulent pandemic.
Simple solution, test & treat early people with symptoms!
I don’t usually listen to Del Bigtree, (I put him in the Alex Jones class) but this debate with G. Edward Griffin, debating Yuri Bezmenov extraordinary TV interview in 1984, I found both fascinating & profound.
The Warning We Ignored | The Highwire 1hr17mins
& full Yuri Bezmenov 1984 interview.
Yuri Bezmenov: Deception Was My Job 2hrs.
Bernie-bro Jimmy Dore recently said that Alex Jones has been correct more times than Rachel Maddow.
I’m not saying he’s wrong, he’s just not for me. Like many he’s turned conspiracy theory into a self enriching business model, if you’re making money out of it you’re not unbiased!
There are many you could add to that list. I particularly dislike the way many turn it into an entertainment talk show with shitty music & MSM style graphics, the truth doesn’t need CGI & LOUD sound effects.
P.S. Jimmy Dore isn’t much better, however despite him being a socialist, I often agree with him too. Dunno about Madcow wouldn’t watch it out of principle.
It didn’t originate with “conspiracy theorists”, it comes directly from the globalists…
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/tyranny/the-stupid-will-believe-it-and-ask-to-be-treated-pandemic-to-depopulate-1981/
Just seen your post after replying to a comment higher up on precisely this point.
Deacon either doesn’t know or is deliberately ignoring the fact that, as you say, the people who planned and promoted the Great Reset etc believe in eugenics, in “improving” the human species’ genetic stock, and the mass vaccination programme could be seen as a powerful selection filter, weeding out the “dumb”.
But as I say above “they” may not have realised that so many of the supposedly “superior” professional classes etc would be so “dumb” and that so many of the people seeing through the lies and resisting would be the “deplorables”. Or maybe they did, and don’t care, so long as it’s the “fittest” who survive in the newly pruned population.
An interesting piece of distraction from controlled opposition Michael Deacon. But let’s not talk about global elite plans to kill everyone with vaccines, Michael. Instead, why not write an article on the massive vaccine injuries and deaths that occurred and this breaks the Nuremberg Code and constitutes a crime against humanity and how it was facilitated by the collusion of a corrupt state controlled press and goons like you.
The idea that the quacksines were designed deliberately to kill people is beyond ridiculous. They are useless, yes. Dangerous to a minority, certainly. Undesirable for all, agreed. Hastily produced, insufficiently tested, promoted by lies, yes. A mass murder weapon, no.
The bullying, the encouragement of herd stupidity and zombie malevolence towards human beings are truly hideous, but the deliberate killing theory merely makes sceptics look as hysterical and gullible as their opponents,
Agreed. It’s more about control, i.e. with vaccine passports. Plus, it wouldn’t surprise me if they’re using vaccination as a cover for a few weird experiments in some areas.
I suspect that there will be few long term effects from either version of the medication. What makes you think that there will be?
hopefully you’ve had all three clotshots, so we’ll find out by asking you.
Yes I have had three doses, two were AstraZeneca and the third was Pfizer. AstraZeneca is not licensed for the third dose. Have I had any side effects, no I haven’t and I don’t anticipate having any. Was the vaccine necessary or effective then I would say probably not. I think there is a total misunderstanding about what the vaccine can and cannot do. Can it change your DNA? No it cannot, however Human Herpes Virus 6 can and does embed itself in the telemores of the chromosomes of around 0.8% of the population. Does the vaccine cause the spike protein to be presented on the outside of infected cells? No it does not, the spikes on the outside of every cell with a nucleus are produced by your own genes, at the end of these spikes are receptacles which contain parts of the proteins produced by the cell itself. If those proteins are meant to be there then that cell is “good”, if the proteins are caused by foreign mRNA or DNA then the cell is infected. T cells connect to these spikes and if the proteins indicate the cell is infected then the T cells will destroy it.… Read more »
Show me the 15 year study for this novel “vaccine”. Oh, sorry, I forgot, there isn’t one… we don’t even know what it does over a year on…
What long term effects do you think there might be? What would be the process by which these effects be produced?
About a month ago, I was on the M5, when an ambulance went tearing past me, all lights and sirens blazing. I noticed the numberplate, because it was a brand new vehicle.
I carried on, and roughly 10 miles further on,what should I see but the same ambulance, same numberplate, now in the inside lane, pootling along at 50, before turning off at the next junction. I wonder if it went back down the motorway the way it had come, in full panic mode?
I honestly think that this was a trick to scare people into thinking that there’s more of a “medical emergency” that there really is. The same week, I saw 2 ambulances a few yards apart, tearing along all lights flashing, on the same motorway. But I never see them in the towns, where the hospitals are. All very odd.
So don’t tell me about hospitals being overwhelmed!
I live near a dual carriageway that they particularly enjoy racing through with their lights on. I noticed their stupid games in Spring 2020. Interestingly I live equidistant between two hospitals and the dual carriageway they race around is the main route between the two hospitals, so they are probably racing back and forth between them.
Hospitals are stretched in certain areas – as they always are at this time. But this, of course, is intimately related to previous decisions re. capacity that the political class wishes to divert attention from.
Deacon seems blissfully unaware that the plan is to get everyone vaccinated, thus the constant pressure from Johnson, Whitty et al. It seems that the jabs are in batches that are deliberately not equally virulent so it’s likely that many will not die in the near future (and so no alarm is raised).
Gradual culling is probably the name of the game until eugenicist Bill Gates’ depopulation targets are met.
Quite so! They could hardly want to kill the majority of the masses – who would clean their loos and sort their plumbing?
I always appreciate the writings of Jeff Tucker at the Brownstone Institute. This week, however, I enjoyed a colleague’s piece just as much or more.
The colleague, a professor at James Madison University, debunks the president of his own university, in an excellent and quick-read memo:
https://brownstone.org/articles/a-memo-to-gmu-president-gregory-washington/
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-10368533/Health-Cheap-blood-test-identify-patient-cancer-spread.html
Anyone else catch this? Interesting timing, coincidentally (ahem) just after the Xmas mass jab drive.
Dr Mary’s monkey…
“Is this the most bizarre anti-vaccine conspiracy theory yet?” – The Telegraph‘s Michael Deacon on the tiny flaw in the supposed plan to massacre the vaccinated but leave the rebellious unvaccinated alive. Globalist Banker Predicted Scamdemic & Genocide of The Useless https://www.thebernician.net/globalist-banker-predicted-scamdemic-genocide-of-the-useless/ The following statements, which were made in 1981 by powerful international banker and unapologetic eugenicist, Jacques Attali, are taken from Interviews with Michel Salomon – The Faces of the Future, Seghers edition, which was published in France by Emi Lit when Attali was a senior adviser to French President, Francoise Mitterand: “In the future it will be a question of finding a way to reduce the population. We will start with the old, because as soon as it exceeds 60-65 years man lives longer than he produces and costs society dearly, then the weak and then the useless who do nothing for society because there will be more and more of them, and especially the stupid ones.Euthanasia targeting these groups; euthanasia will have to be an essential instrument of our future societies, in all cases. We cannot of course execute people or set up camps. We will get rid of them by making them believe it is for… Read more »
Thank you! I knew that there had been real and serious thought put into this kind of programme by people of influence.
There is a caveat which I should have included which is that it is refuted as to whether he did or did not say this. I assume you need this edition to get the quote, it could have been taken out of other editions for example. But these banksters and people of influence can be quite open and frank about their plans