We Can’t Vaccinate the Planet Every Six Months, Says JCVI Chief

Professor Sir Andrew Pollard, the head of Britain’s vaccine body, has said fourth jabs should not be offered until there is more evidence as he warned that giving a new dose to people every six months was “not sustainable”. In an interview with the Telegraph the Chairman of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) also said there was no point in trying to stop all infections, and that “at some point, society has to open up”.

Speaking to mark the first anniversary of the AstraZeneca jab rollout last January, Sir Andrew said: “The worst is absolutely behind us. We just need to get through the winter.”

He wants lockdowns to be consigned to history, adding: “At some point, society has to open up. When we do open, there will be a period with a bump in infections, which is why winter is probably not the best time.

“But that’s a decision for the policy makers, not the scientists. Our approach has to switch, to rely on the vaccines and the boosters. The greatest risk is still the unvaccinated.”

Sir Andrew cautioned against blindly following Israel and Germany, which have given the green light to a second set of boosters to all over-60s.

“The future must be focusing on the vulnerable and making boosters or treatments available to them to protect them,” he said. 

“We know that people have strong antibodies for a few months after their third vaccination, but more data are needed to assess whether, when and how often those who are vulnerable will need additional doses.”

Vaccines can rapidly be adapted to fight new variants, but he said: “We can’t vaccinate the planet every four to six months. It’s not sustainable or affordable. In the future, we need to target the vulnerable.”

Worth reading in full.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

161 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
karenovirus
4 years ago

As mentioned previously this morning, early last Autumn the vaccine endgame of the international diplomatic health mafia was precisely to vaccinate the whole world (and by extension as frequently as is required).

“No country is safe from Covid until every country is safe from Covid”.

The Prof says “at some point the country will have to open up”.
It’s twats like him that caused the country to close down unnecessarily in the first place.

8bit
8bit
4 years ago
Reply to  karenovirus

You need to mention the Gates character, who five or six years ago (or longer) was yelping on youtube about ‘vaccinating the whole world’ and ‘nobody would have a choice in the matter’ (wtf?). Bizarrely, he never specified what the drug was or what the justification was – just a total global stab-fest with a ‘vaccine’. Way back, they were telling us in plain sight what was in their megalomaniac minds.

George L
4 years ago
Reply to  8bit

Well remembered..

Rowan
Rowan
4 years ago
Reply to  8bit

It is about genocide and making lashings of money on the back of it. These people are total scum.

karenovirus
4 years ago
Reply to  8bit

Gates has little direct power, just lots of money and influence.

Those who run the WHO have the force of law behind them.

I read recently that duly ratified international treaties take precedence over domestic law.

TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
4 years ago
Reply to  karenovirus

No country is safe from Covid the globalist “health” mafia.

George L
4 years ago

That’s more like it..

Judy Watson
Judy Watson
4 years ago

Take a look at Burundi

mariawarmth
4 years ago
Reply to  karenovirus

Yes they are all changing their tune. Now that allegations of crimes against humanity are being logged with crime numbers and at The Hague! Not to mention Mr Malones concerns being share more widely.
They cannot be let off the hook!!!

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago
Reply to  mariawarmth

Dr. Malone?

Lockdown Sceptic
4 years ago
Reply to  karenovirus

“We Can’t Vaccinate the Planet Every Six Months, Says JCVI Chief”
But of course they will try no matter how many die:

Betty White’s Cause of Death Revealed, Agent Shuts Down Booster Shot Rumors

https://www.theepochtimes.com/betty-whites-cause-of-death-revealed-agent-shuts-down-booster-shot-rumors_4191628.html?utm_source=newsnoe&utm_campaign=breaking-2022-01-04-1&utm_medium=email&est=EovTMLJ198jrrlXrGIClc6ABOp1jVFRuAe4IcJxGeBSqSkiB6cs%2FgWFe3iSkLxHrQ2q9

By Isabel van Brugen January 3, 2022

When you are demonised for speaking the truth you are living in tyranny. Please come and join our friendly events.

Saturday 8th January 2pm – Marlow
Berks & Bucks Freedom Day 
Higginson Park corner of High Street & Pound Lane
Marlow SL7 1NF
and get your boost of freedom!!

Stand in the Park Sundays 10am  make friends, ignore the madness & keep sane 
Wokingham – Howard Palmer Gardens Cockpit Path car park Sturges Rd RG40 2HD  

Telegram Group 
http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell

Vir Cotto
4 years ago

The greatest risk is still the unvaccinated.””

Yawn.

karenovirus
4 years ago
Reply to  Vir Cotto

Probably a further ploy to get the West to stop Vaccine Hoarding and instead pay for the Third World Developing Nations to get theirs.

Lucan Grey
4 years ago
Reply to  karenovirus

The latest euphemism is “Global South”. Apparently the same sort of people who took the hump about “Third World” decided to take the hump about “Developing Nations” as well.

And of course as we know the best way to neutralise attention seeking behaviour is to appease it.

MrTea
MrTea
4 years ago
Reply to  Lucan Grey

I think you will find the correct term is ‘shit holes’.

trevorpee
trevorpee
4 years ago
Reply to  Lucan Grey

Perhaps they realised that ‘nations’ that show no inclination or ability to actually develop needed a less ridiculous label!

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago
Reply to  trevorpee

Sorry but many of these people are trapped in poverty by slave drivers like the EU and China
It’s perfectly possible for these countries to do well, Rhodesia used to be the bread basket of Africa.

karenovirus
4 years ago
Reply to  Lucan Grey

First time I’ve heard of Global South.
New game ! Name a third world Deoping Nation that is not south of the Equator.

Me First ! ! !

Mongolia.

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago
Reply to  karenovirus

Does global mean that “covid” ravaged “country” Antarctica?

helenf
4 years ago
Reply to  Vir Cotto

“The greatest risk is still the unvaccinated.”

As he doesn’t say the greatest risk is to the unvaccinated, I presume he means this group pose the greatest risk to exposing the fake covid narrative, the fraudulent Government, and their stooges like the JCVI.

sophie123
4 years ago
Reply to  helenf

exactly that

cornubian
4 years ago
Reply to  Vir Cotto

Pollard is fully aware that injection-related serious injuries/deaths are running at a minimum of 100 times all the UK’s previous injections put together – yet refuses to draw attention to this or factor it into his thinking. By doing so, he covering up state-sanctioned murder – just like the MHRA/UKHSA/NHS axis of evil are doing.

George L
4 years ago
Reply to  cornubian

This.. ^^^^^^^^ he’s covering for mass murder..

sophie123
4 years ago
Reply to  George L

As well he might, given that he is a key perpetrator with the AZ vaccine development. They have know for a long time that the adenovirus vector vaccines have risks of clotting associated with them. Acceptable for Ebola perhaps, but not for this virus.

cornubian
4 years ago
Reply to  Vir Cotto

Lockdowns dont work, we need to rely solely on “vaccines and the boosters”, says the man whose job is funded not only by this criminal government, but also by vaccine profiteers The Welcome Trust and Bill Gates.

George L
4 years ago
Reply to  cornubian

Absolutely.. where do they dig up all these mealy mouthed individuals..

George L
4 years ago
Reply to  Vir Cotto

Yeah.. he just had to get it in didn’t he..

stewart
4 years ago
Reply to  Vir Cotto

The greatest risk… to the vaccine pushers.
It is the control group of “unvaccinated” that will expose the damage of the jabs.
They need to get rid of the control group to cover up their crime.

cornubian
4 years ago
Reply to  stewart

Absolutely right. That is why he is pushing the regime to concentrate on resistors and not the mutiple stabbed who are already part of the program.

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago
Reply to  stewart

Can’t be done except possibly in Gibraltar (who have mortality equivalent to over 200,000 in the UK, almost all of whom have died since “vaccination” started).

BS665
BS665
4 years ago

Fraudulent pseudo-rebel.

More fodder for their dialectic.

steve_z
4 years ago

almost anyone I know that clearly hasn’t had covid before has had it in the last few weeks

though even this hyper infectious variant is struggling to infect more than 1 person each

R value from Zoe below

1st peak delta, latest peak Omicron – its pretty much done

R.png
iane
iane
4 years ago
Reply to  steve_z

Well, I and my wife (both unstabbed) haven’t had a glimmer of a cold/flu/covid over the last two years.

Jane G
Jane G
4 years ago
Reply to  iane

Ditto me and husband (and son and his wife). Can’t seem to catch the damn thing and I’m sitting close beside upwards of 20 music pupils of assorted ages weekly.

steve_z
4 years ago
Reply to  iane

I’ve had it as has my wife – tickly throat – and that was delta

My brother has omicron currently – runny nose

all unvaxxed – this is beyond ridiculous

George L
4 years ago
Reply to  steve_z

Your brother has a cold then Steve.. 😉

cornubian
4 years ago
Reply to  George L

These people who insist they had covid really get me. Ive just had a cold that developed into a chest infection – same thing I get every year around this time. What was the specific cause? Well take your pick from 100,000 viruses currently doing the rounds.

steve_z
4 years ago
Reply to  George L

he does and not even a bad one – but his covipanic boss forced him to go home and isolate

jda7778
4 years ago
Reply to  steve_z

I had covid in November & infact was in hospital for 2 days. Was fine after being given oxygen & steroids+antibiotics. People still ask me if I’m getting the vaccine & my answer is why would I?

George L
4 years ago
Reply to  iane

Same here.. funny that!

Hopeless
4 years ago

As has been well-described in the “Left Lockdown Sceptics” article in today’s round-up, it is a bit mysterious how Moronic turned up here towards the end of November, yet somehow Pfizer could claim efficacy of a third dose against it, a few days into December.

I don’t buy the “at speed” claims for the development of this still-experimental stuff,and it is pretty clear that questions of efficacy, and side effects, both short and long term, have been swerved, concealed or just not addressed.

Clearly, someone has persuaded the government to buy millions of doses at enormous cost, and failure to use them is likely to be a slight embarrassment, although this lot seem blind to their failures in procurement. I expect “cui bono” is at work, as well.

There really doesn’t seem to be any good reason why “The World” should let itself be hooked on this, at enormous expense, by corrupt and manipulative governments, and Big Pharma. If it were a “proper” vaccine, fully tested and trialled, and with no genetic manipulation of the recipient, then it would be a whole different matter.

steve_z
4 years ago
Reply to  Hopeless

Pfizer could claim efficacy of a third dose against it, a few days into December”

I expect based on test tube studies – only vaguely related to the real world

FrankFisher
4 years ago
Reply to  steve_z

Yes, in vitro, thus discounting any real world negative impact of repeated jabbing.

Rowan
Rowan
4 years ago
Reply to  steve_z

It would more likely be based on nothing.

ComeTheRevolution
ComeTheRevolution
4 years ago
Reply to  steve_z

The absolute must watch and share Canadian Covid Care Pfizer presentation, as famously posted by RobertMalone on Twitter, the one that got him banned:

More Harm Than Good – The Pfizer Inoculations For Covid-19 | Canadian Covid Care Alliance
https://www.bitchute.com/video/RaQkNEzpAdQo/

cornubian
4 years ago
Reply to  Hopeless

Some of the best writing on this is to be found in Left Lockdown Sceptics.

Oscarone
Oscarone
4 years ago
Reply to  Hopeless

“Clearly, someone has persuaded the government to buy millions of doses at enormous cost, and failure to use them is likely to be a slight embarrassment”
I remember reading the following article (the Guardian was still fairly enquiring then) and others in the period after the swine flu “pandemic”. Drug companies face European inquiry over swine flu vaccine stockpiles | Swine flu | The Guardian There were lots of unused vaccines in Europe and it seems they were simply offloaded onto countries such as Pakistan. Why could the same not happen now (not that I’m saying it’s a good thing). The answer, I think, is that unfortunately this time the objective is to actually get the contents of the “vaccine” into people’s bodies.

George L
4 years ago
Reply to  Oscarone

To compliment your Guardian snippet.. Channel 4 News Swine Flu Scam..

Channel 4 News Exposes The 2009 Swine Flu Scandal

Rowan
Rowan
4 years ago
Reply to  Oscarone

It’s about global genocide and the governments of all major countries have signed up for the cull. That should be clear to everyone by now.

George L
4 years ago
Reply to  Hopeless

I’ve written to Pfizer asking for advice on lottery numbers.. I expect to be a multi-millionaire very soon..

Arfur Mo
Arfur Mo
4 years ago
Reply to  Hopeless

There was a mysterious South African variant that appeared in Feb(?) 2021. Given how these things pan out, it would seem unlikely that one country produced two ‘variants of concern’ – or is that Koncern?

George L
4 years ago
Reply to  Arfur Mo

More emphasis on the ‘con’ needed.. Arfur..

Rowan
Rowan
4 years ago
Reply to  Hopeless

There has never been a good reason why governments the world over have at great expense committed their countries to buy unlicensed “vaccines” that don’t work and are clearly exceptionally dangerous. We have to look past the government stupidity meme and work on the basis that something very sinister is now in process.

Gregoryno6
4 years ago

Anthony Fauci is very disappointed in you, Sir Andrew.

JamesM
JamesM
4 years ago

The truth is the vaccines are nowhere as near as good as originally claimed and are now showing negative effectiveness against omicron. Pollard knows the game is up. He and people like Mark Woolhouse are trying to cover their backs, but it won’t work. They are guilty men and must be held to account. 

steve_z
4 years ago
Reply to  JamesM

I suspect Omicron will end this and we will just be left wondering whether heavily vaxxed people have longer term effects – they seem to be more likely to be infected but we don’t have an RCT

FrankFisher
4 years ago
Reply to  steve_z

well, we COULD have a controlled trial, starting now. Everyone unvaxxed, not randomly, stays unvaxxed. Everyone vaxxed hopes they haven’t been screwed.

cornubian
4 years ago
Reply to  FrankFisher

They do not want a control group. Thats why the manufacturers destroyed their own control groups and want to inject every person on earth.

TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
4 years ago
Reply to  steve_z

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/06/210611174037.htm

I wonder how many mRNA injected people have it written back into their DNA?

Making spike proteins forever should be pretty harmful as they cause lots of harms

cornubian
4 years ago
Reply to  JamesM

Listen to what Pollard writes, ‘lockdowns don’t work, we need to rely solely on injections’. They are not covering their backs, they are stepping up levels of pro-injection propaganda so that both he, and his pals and funders, can make even more dosh..

Ruth Learner
Ruth Learner
4 years ago

Is this guy serious? ‘Vax misinformation cost lives’? Yes it sure has- your shitty Oxford shot along with the shitty shots from Pfizer, Moderna et al. aka the crime syndicate – have cost many lives and injured millions… for what? A cold / flu / even if it was fucking pneumonia – that can be treated safely and cheaply for nearly everyone. You are as liable and as dangerous as the drug pushers and there will be justice.

loopDloop
loopDloop
4 years ago

Oh come on Pollard, buck up. That’s not the spirit that won the war. Of course we can vaccinate with the fourth fifth and sixth boosters. Stop being such a pussy. Roll up the sleeves and get on with it. If the jabs don’t go in the arms, where are they going to go? Huh? Didn’t think of that did you. Get a grip man. The jobs not done yet, not by a long way. Talk like that and we’re going to have to label you an antivaxxer. And it doesn’t get much worse than that.

Annie
4 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

Where will they go? Up some people’s a…s. Suggestions on a postcard, please.

mikec
4 years ago

Oh no, the emperor/fataturk has no new clothes. What are we to do, do you think this may have something to do with the US actuary reporting that working age non-COVID deaths have leapt by 40% since the jabs started?

’You’re killing people’ was the cry when you sat on a park bench, obviously not – that didn’t start until they got their jabs out.

steve_z
4 years ago

as far as I can remember, both Pollard and Sarah Gilbert advised doing everybody vulnerable in the world before moving down the age groups. I expect they realise the risk benefit just doesnt work if you are under 70

Annie
4 years ago
Reply to  steve_z

And if you’re over?

steve_z
4 years ago
Reply to  Annie

we don’t know until we have long term data

TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
4 years ago
Reply to  steve_z

Yes I think 70 is about right for the risk benefit ratio.

You’ve got a lot less long term to risk at that age.

Paul B
4 years ago

“Every six!? I said three!” B Gates 2021

buzzer
buzzer
4 years ago

The vaccines were never designed to prevent transmission or infection. We are now reminded of that ( but not at the time of release) (it was declared by Pfizer from the outset). The definition of vaccine was changed to accommodate this. Coronaviruses mutate rapidly meaning vaccine development ( even rapid and irresponsible) could never keep up with their evolution. The strategy of using vaccines as a primary method of containment (vax as now defined) was never going to work on a country or world wide basis. These guys knew this.

steve_z
4 years ago
Reply to  buzzer

yes, we all knew this – they’ve failed to make a coronavirus vaccine in 50 years of trying

buzzer
buzzer
4 years ago
Reply to  steve_z

Using the old definition of vaccine of course..

8bit
8bit
4 years ago
Reply to  buzzer

Quote from McCullough:

“They either knew or they should have known.”

No other plausible option.

TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
4 years ago
Reply to  buzzer

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/yes-the-vaccines-were-supposed-to

yes, the vaccines were supposed to stop covid spread. yes, the “experts” told us so.adventures in revisionist historycomment image
el gato malo
Dec 30, 2021

567

278

the revisionist history around vaccines is getting pretty extreme. let’s be VERY clear:

  • yes, they were promised to stop spread, contagion, and provide herd immunity.
  • yes, those promises were made by the same “experts” currently claiming “vaccines were never supposed to stop spread, just reduce severity.”
  • yes, they were so committed to this that they literally changed the definition of “herd immunity” to EXCLUDE natural immunity.

(of course, they then changed the definition of “vaccine” as well to make this look like less of a failure)

  • and yes, all the unprecedented lock down and mask up policies were pushed explicitly as “only necessary until we get the vaccines.”

despite the massive PR offensive underway to deny this, these are the facts.
this is what they sold us.
and we have the receipts.
i’m going to compile them here so people have them. if you have more, please drop links in the comments. this is information that needs to be preserved instead of whitewashed out of existence.
let’s start with this compilation from always on point gatopal™ and rational ground stalwart justin hart who in his inimitable way, once more skewers the fauci follies from CNBC yesterday.
watch the video. it’s a doozie.
comment imageJustin Hart
@justin_hart
Dr. Fauci on CNBC
Host: “I wonder whether you felt there had been a communication error…”
Fauci: “Well I think it was the question of what people interpreted…”

December 29th 2021
908 Retweets2,168 Likes
this new tale of “communication errors” is a complete fabrication.
tony could not have been more clear. in fact, this whole “vaccinated people become dead ends for the virus and cannot spread it” talking point was his invention. they are his words.

comment image

and these words rapidly appeared in the mouths of this whole team of panacea pushers as they stridently advocated for a solution they clearly did not understand.
he repeated them over and over.

comment image

they popped out of walensky’s mouth immediately.
comment imageTell It Like It Is!
@Jeres_Rant
“Our data from the ⁦@CDCgov⁩ today suggests that vaccinated people do not carry the #virus, don’t get sick, and that it’s not just in the clinical trials but it’s also in real-world data,” #covid
comment imageIt’s official: Vaccinated people don’t spread COVID-19
CDC Director Rochelle Walensky this week declared that “vaccinated people do not carry the virus.”
fortune.com
April 2nd 2021
7 Retweets13 Likes
they were echoed by entire phalanxes of talking heads in no uncertain terms.
comment imageAaron Ginn
@aginnt
Let’s go back in time to 3/29/21

“No we know that the vaccines work well enough that the virus stops with every vaccinated person… The virus does not infect them…It cannot use a vaccinated person as a host to get more people.”

December 26th 2021
7,729 Retweets18,457 Likes
this was not “open to interpretation.” this was one unified edifice of talking points flawless in its fealty to narrative and relentless in its application.
even “the big guy” got involved.

comment image

but it all traces back to tony.

mariawarmth
4 years ago

Great informative thank you. I can’t tick like button so tick ✅

TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
4 years ago
Reply to  buzzer

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/yes-the-vaccines-were-supposed-to

yes, the vaccines were supposed to stop covid spread. yes, the “experts” told us so.
adventures in revisionist history

the revisionist history around vaccines is getting pretty extreme. let’s be VERY clear:

yes, they were promised to stop spread, contagion, and provide herd immunity.

yes, those promises were made by the same “experts” currently claiming “vaccines were never supposed to stop spread, just reduce severity.”

yes, they were so committed to this that they literally changed the definition of “herd immunity” to EXCLUDE natural immunity.

(of course, they then changed the definition of “vaccine” as well to make this look like less of a failure)

and yes, all the unprecedented lock down and mask up policies were pushed explicitly as “only necessary until we get the vaccines.”
comment image

DanClarke
DanClarke
4 years ago

Problem is, what are we being kept ‘safe’ from? For most people it’s a cold for which we have already many generic solutions, or is that the problem, they want the ‘new’ solutions to become the norm. The old, now, generic, pharmaceuticals don’t make enough money

steve_z
4 years ago
Reply to  DanClarke

they’ve tried and failed to get mRNA vaccines licensed for 20 years. , I think this was their chance to rush something out, have a big success and now they’ll rush out mRNA for everything. I suspect it will fail for the same reasons mRNA hasn’t been licensed before – side effects aren’t worth it for the benefits

eyesee
eyesee
4 years ago

Oh yes we can, says Big Pharma.

annieob
annieob
4 years ago

He’s incoherent. On the one hand, he says we can’t vaccinate the planet every six months. But he also says we need to ‘rely on the vaccines and the boosters’, while admitting antibodies from vaccination wane. So how can we ‘rely on the boosters’ without vaccinating everyone every 6 months? We can’t. (We can rely on natural immunity, but no mention of that.)

And in what sense are the unvaccinated ‘the biggest danger’? Is he arguing unvaccinated people (note his impersonal, ‘othering’ wording) will catch and transmit the virus while vaccinated people won’t? Because we know that argument is junk. So what is this ‘danger’? (I note it doesn’t seem to have occurred to him that unvaccinated people might have actually had COVID and acquired actual long lasting immunity, unlike his repeatedly jabbed guinea pigs.)

This man isn’t an opponent of medical totalitarianism. He’s at best a hopelessly muddled thinker whose incoherence will have disastrous effects. He looks more like a sinister vaccine fanatic driving forward mandatory vaccines on the basis of this unexplained ‘danger’, and pushing reliance on a product that will, despite his protestations, inevitably mean vaccinating us all every 6 months.

cornubian
4 years ago
Reply to  annieob

He is angry that the needle nazis are injecting the same people many times over while letting millions of us slip through the net. He wants the regime to focus on forcing us onto their experimental program.

refusenick
4 years ago
Reply to  cornubian

Exactly

Judy Watson
Judy Watson
4 years ago
Reply to  cornubian

If you read the book by Senator Robert Kennedy you will see that this odius heap of excrement id one massive duplicitator. He is beyonf evil. Worse tham mengele.

X - In Search of Space
X - In Search of Space
4 years ago
Reply to  annieob

Totally agree. As I got to his 3rd para of comments, I thought: eh, this is a bit bizarre. A clear contradiction, surely? It was very confusing.

It was such a pity (yet again), after reading a promising headline/start of a story, to then discover that it is actually just more crazy shit. Arghh.

TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
4 years ago
Reply to  annieob

Boris Johnson on boosters – YouTube

Even boris says you’ll still catch and spread SARS2

Annie
4 years ago

Even a glimmer of common sense from an ‘expert’ covvifascist is to be welcomed.
One cheer. Maybe.

RTSC
RTSC
4 years ago

We should ALWAYS have just targeted the vulnerable.

Which is what the genuine experts who created The Great Barrington Declaration said ….. and were attacked for saying.

DanClarke
DanClarke
4 years ago
Reply to  RTSC

Targeted as in the ‘normal’ ie yearly flu jab minus the hysteria, please

The Rule of Pricks
The Rule of Pricks
4 years ago

Lets face it 2022 is going to be the year of the back-pedalling. Very little of it is going to make sense as people who were previously gung ho for lockdowns and vaccines despite the evidence are not going to make complete U turns and its only right that they should be labelled as hypocrites and idiots, and not let off the hook simply because they have undergone some kind of Damascene conversion.

But it should also be applauded when, even if laughable, a public figure or the MSM highlight a fact or opinion that chips away at the orthodoxy, even if we have known it all along.

One small step (hopefully)

NickR
4 years ago

Pollard makes a big issue about vaccinating African countries. However, look at the relative rate of deaths reported in the UK & Africa, why would African countries spend money on vaccination ahead of more pressing medical needs?

040122 Africa v UK deaths.jpg
Paul_Somerset
4 years ago
Reply to  NickR

I mentioned this in the Telegraph comments under the article, and got the inevitable patronizing reply that, ah yes, but the African population is younger, didn’t you know?

Glad to see you’re agreeing that they don’t need vaccinating then, I replied.

And that ended that discussion.

Deborah T
Deborah T
4 years ago

The greatest risk is still the unvaccinated.

WHY? WHY? Why are we a ‘risk’ – those who refuse to allow themselves to be injected with something that permanently alters the way their bodies work (no thank you – I’ll pass), that they can never get rid of, with no long-term safety data, for an illness that has a less than 3 in 1000 mortality rate (affecting 80+ with comorbidities disproportionately) that is proven not to stop infection, and that is proven not to stop transmission? I’m 63, take no pharmaceuticals, run five miles a week… Why am I such a ‘risk’, Andrew? Explain!!! Stop the pressure. Stop the lies. Not satisfied with 95%, or whatever the hell it is, in my age-group? Not satisfied with injecting teenagers? Get off our backs!!

Hopeless
4 years ago
Reply to  Deborah T

Although pretty much nonsense in a medical sense, with all the usual cogent arguments against e.g. the “vaccinated” are supposedly “protected”, whilst the Untermensch “unvaccinated” aren’t, and bear any “risk” through choice, I suspect that the “risk” stuff comes down to our old friend “Protecting the NHS” against being “overwhelmed”, normal treatment for other ailments cancelled or curtailed.

If vaccine scepticism is such a problem, the idea that endlessly telling people that the stuff is “safe”, as per all the NHS guff, is ridiculous. I see absolutely no attempts to explain, allay or counter arguments/concerns about ADE, long term potential problems etc. etc. by or from the people pushing the stuff.

CynicalRealist
4 years ago
Reply to  Hopeless

If vaccine scepticism is such a problem, the idea that endlessly telling people that the stuff is “safe”, as per all the NHS guff, is ridiculous. I see absolutely no attempts to explain, allay or counter arguments/concerns about ADE, long term potential problems etc. etc. by or from the people pushing the stuff.

They don’t have any answers to those awkward questions.The issue they have now is that they’ve used the tactic of repeating ‘safe and effective’ over and over until all those who will believe it have been spiked, and they are left with those who don’t believe it and are generally well-informed about the situation.

Username1
4 years ago
Reply to  Deborah T

Can you please be more clear, darling, I don’t think you expressed yourself . My once partner is thrice jabbed now “because I will need to travel abroad”. Has no intention of going overseas.

Username1
4 years ago

Was thinking about the actual act. A sharp piece of metal going into your arm. It doesn’t hurt apparently. Of course, if you have a bad case of something you will want an injection – malaria rabies tb

Sforzesca
Sforzesca
4 years ago

Despite being, apparently, an immunologist, he still has it in for the “unvaccinated”..
Even were his assertions accurate (and plenty of immunologists would disagree) he seems incapable of distinguishing the unvaxxed but never had covid and the unvaxxed had it, but actually not dead/hospitalised from it AND never been “infected” again.
Has anyone seen any data re this? It must exist but obviously doesn’t fit the everyone must be jabbed to ensure everyone has digital ID, sorry, so that everyone’s safe.

He doesn’t seem capable of acknowledging that his “vaccines” do not afford sterilising immunity, unlike the recovered naturally, and that as such they are contributing little towards proper sterilising immunity ie herd immunity.

Given his expertise he also seems astonishingly relaxed as regards the harmful effects of his product – OAS, ADE, and future resultant immunological diseases, not to mention the vaxxed carrying unnaturally high antibody loads – increasing with each jab by the way.

It would be interesting to see him and say Dr. Robert Malone and GVB discuss the above.

FrankFisher
4 years ago

The greatest risk is still the unvaccinated.

This arsehole needs to be challenged on that. In what way are they a risk? Oh, and given the data on an antibody response shows it in 95%+ of adults, when the vaccination is 80%, can this so-called scientist consider for ONE SECOND that perhaps many of the “unvaccinated” are intelligently unvaccinated because they have HAD covid? I would really like these shills just once to be put on the spot and explain how their half baked faux vaccines provide better immunity than a wild infection. With references.

DanClarke
DanClarke
4 years ago

The only people I know who’ve been ill, are the jabbed, one has had 5 in the last year, 2 vaccine, 1 booster, flu and pneumonia, and now is ill again and hoping its “not the virus again”. I’ve advised her to try hot lemon this time.

Javy
Javy
4 years ago
Reply to  DanClarke

In 2020 I didn’t know of any family, friends or acquaintances who had the virus but I knew several whose mental health was seriously affected by the lockdowns. In 2021, and particularly since the magical booster came on the scene, I have known a significant number who have gone down with a cold. All say they tested positive and believe they would have been much worse if they had been unvaccinated. In the last few months I’ve been aware of several more friends suffering quite severe depression. At times it feels I might be heading that way……

John001
John001
4 years ago
Reply to  Javy

I think many people are at least mildly depressed by this. You may find vitamin D3 helps. Taking it, I don’t really get anything more than mild depression.

I started very high doses of it in about 2018 (two 10,000IU tablets every week). It also keeps your immune system in top condition so you almost certainly won’t get COVID.

Paul_Somerset
4 years ago
Reply to  John001

Supplements consume a hell of a lot of magnesium at those levels. Be careful. That can lead to real problems, including the heart.

John001
John001
4 years ago
Reply to  Paul_Somerset

Indeed, vitamin D at that level may only be sensible if you already have a very healthy diet, full of magnesium, zinc and so on. My blood level is about 150 nmol / litre. Ditto for a retired doctor who takes the same dose.

I think of it as a sunshine substitute. I don’t seem able to make enough vit.D at this latitude and in this cloudy climate. My blood sugar was too high at lower vit.D levels, like ~90 and I was ‘pre-diabetic’. So I think I’m better where I am now than where I was in 2018.

Javy
Javy
4 years ago
Reply to  John001

Have been taking Vitamin D since about October last year, John. Not had any colds, flu or COVID so far !

DanClarke
DanClarke
4 years ago
Reply to  Javy

Ask them how they know they would have been much worse. Can’t believe the mind games!

Judy Watson
Judy Watson
4 years ago
Reply to  DanClarke

Especially with a shot of brandy😉😉

Cecil B
Cecil B
4 years ago

How about every ten weeks?

Liz F
Liz F
4 years ago
Reply to  Cecil B

Dear God in heaven, how ghastly.

mikec
4 years ago

This is probably a government approved stance/press release, the figures from the insurance actuary last week have scared them sh1tless. A 40% rise in working age non-Covid deaths (16-65) since the jab introduced. The killer statistic for the jab was when the actuary mentioned that a 10% rise would normally be seen as a 1 in 200 year event.

This is data that the Government can’t twist, insurance claims made by bereaved next of kin/relatives. How many more need to die needlessly at the end of their needles?

Sforzesca
Sforzesca
4 years ago
Reply to  mikec

Real proper experts in the field have been advising insurers from the start of the pandemic.
I seem to remember reading some time ago that some of the data actuaries produced was nobbled, but the trillion dollar/pound insurance companies, quite obviously, trust their expert advisers.
Michael Levitt was advising them over two years ago and concluded even then that covid would not materially affect average longevity (which by the way had been decreasing very gradually before covid).
We have seen the effects of the deliberately engineered fear porn, ie premature deaths from cancers, heart attacks, dementia etc. and now the real elephant in the room – jab deaths are inevitably being detected.
They might fool the public, but they ain’t fooling the actuarial suits.

The whole bloody nightmare has been engineered by the RPTB.
They are beyond evil.

FrankFisher
4 years ago
Reply to  Sforzesca

There has been no pandemic

Sforzesca
Sforzesca
4 years ago
Reply to  FrankFisher

(I just forgot the inverted commas).

Beowulf
Beowulf
4 years ago
Reply to  mikec

Can you provide a link to the actuary’s comments? I’d like to send it to a triple vaxed friend of mine.

Beowulf
Beowulf
4 years ago
Reply to  Dodderydude

Thanks, that’ll do the trick.

Liz F
Liz F
4 years ago

Pollard is Chair of the JCVI and led the trials for the AZ jabs. How is that not a conflict of interests?

John001
John001
4 years ago
Reply to  Liz F

It’s quite blatant. In 2017 the BMJ expressed concern at Whitty, van Tam and Vallance getting top jobs, due to their pharma ties.

Moderate Radical
4 years ago

SAJID JAVID GETS SERVED NOTICE ON HIS OWN DOORSTEP

https://www.bitchute.com/video/gR70mvqcnEG4/