Whistleblowing BBC Journalist Exposes Lockdown Zealotry of Colleagues
A pseudonymous BBC reporter calling himself Charlie Walsham has written a brilliant exposé in the Spectator about the pro-lockdown bias of his colleagues. Here’s how it begins:
I have been a BBC journalist for many years, and in that time I have been committed to impartiality and the corporation’s Reithian values to inform and educate. My despair about the BBC’s one-sided coverage of the pandemic though has been steadily growing for some time. And in early December, as I listened to a BBC radio broadcast, I felt the corporation reach a new low.
During a morning phone-in show on 5Live the topic of discussion was Covid jabs and whether they should be mandated, or if punitive action should be taken against those who refuse them, such as imposing lockdowns on the unvaccinated. Setting aside the fact that these authoritarian measures are now considered a matter for breezy debate, I at least expected a balanced discussion.
This was wishful thinking on my part, as ‘Michael from Birmingham’ – a caller – was about to find out. Michael told the host he hadn’t been vaccinated because he didn’t trust ‘the data’ and cited historic incidents of documented corporate malfeasance by pharmaceutical giants to explain why he was concerned. Now you may disagree with Michael, or think him completely deluded, but he was still a person who had genuine fears about the vaccine and its safety. Yet instead of holding a reasoned debate with his concerned caller, the host immediately lost his temper, talked over Michael, implied he was a flat-earther and then muted him entirely.
It was an interaction that goes to the very heart of the dismal failure of BBC News. I have been working at BBC News throughout the Covid era and have witnessed how the insatiable demands of the 24-hour news cycle have exacerbated a serious and protracted crisis. I have also seen how any attempt at balance has been abandoned in favour of supporting and promoting Covid restrictions.
The downhearted journalist began to feel a bit better in the run-up to July 19th, but the reaction to the Omicron variant has plunged him back into despair.
As ‘Freedom Day’ beckoned in July this year, I began to feel less downbeat about the BBC. Sure, BBC News outlets continued to invite an army of Covid zealots onto the airwaves, all of whom seemed to call for restrictions to continue indefinitely. But I thought the end of the pandemic might be in sight. Most of my BBC colleagues are good, well-meaning people. Perhaps senior managers and editors were guilty only of a form of noble cause corruption, trying their best during an unprecedented health crisis to help keep the public safe. Maybe the BBC had done nothing fundamentally wrong and I was the one who was overreacting.
But this winter has seen a rise in infections again, and inevitably there have been renewed calls for the country to lock down to protect our health service. No one knows how bad the Omicron wave will be and it might just be that only a lockdown can prevent the NHS being overwhelmed this winter. But the national broadcaster should surely feature both sides of the debate and not just relentlessly make the case for further restrictions while ignoring the toll they have on our society.
The BBC insists that it has “covered the pandemic with great care and in detail, which is what people expect of the BBC and it is why we have seen record audiences coming to us throughout, both in the UK and around the world”. But there are signs that the corporation is once again failing in this critical function. The BBC News website now almost constantly features the ‘Live’ number of coronavirus cases. “Two vaccine doses don’t stop you catching Omicron” read a headline last week, as if this was somehow remarkable – totally ignoring the fact that double-jabbed BBC staff had been succumbing to Covid for months, long before Omicron reared its head.
Worth reading in full.
Stop Press: In spite of the BBC churning out pro-lockdown propaganda 24/7, the public are generally content with the current level of restrictions and don’t want them to be ratcheted up. That was the finding of Kekst CNC, as reported in today’s Sunday Times: “58% of people oppose closing all pubs and restaurants, while 60% oppose a ban on household meetings over Christmas.
You can read a detailed breakdown of this polling in a Twitter thread by Kekst CNC head James Johnson here. And worth bearing in mind that this is an online poll so is almost certainly exaggerating support for further restrictions due to pro-social bias, as described by Mike Hearn in this piece.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
“The prime minister’s official spokesperson said last week: “In the summer months Downing Street staff regularly use the garden for some meetings.”
Oh, it’s an afternoon booze up…err “business meeting.”
Topic: “How to screw the Plebs!”
I must confess, I have never been to a business meeting with the wife of one of the participants present. Nor have I been to one where nobody has any papers or a laptop/tablet on the table, even during a break for lunch.
I count 4 booze bottles in that photo, but there may be more hiding in the shadows… 😉
Surely the vilification of the unjabbed is moving into hate crime territory?
To me, it’s no different to the Cold War dissidents in the former USSR. And some ‘Western’ countries are already locking up/building all new internment camps. So much for us winning the Cold War.
I think the UK is under the guise of “Super-Prisons”.
Reports from people who have been there suggest they are capable of holding far more than the 1500 claimed. Besides, after all these years of aging prisons they suddenly produce the money to replace them all at once?
https://www.ukcolumn.org/community/forums/topic/6-new-mega-prisons-are-being-built-in-uk/
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/15114651/inside-britains-first-privately-run-mega-prison/
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/mar/22/four-supersized-prisons-to-be-built-england-and-wales-elizabeth-truss-plan
Will they hold 15 million plus? Because that’s the number of unvaxxed adults.
They don’t need to hold them all at once. There are 6, let’s assume they hold 1500 x 10 (crammed in) x 6. That’s 90,000, let’s say they hold them for 2 weeks. That’s 2.3M processed per annum. Once they start interning people let’s assume a further 5M take the jabs. That means you could process the refuseniks in ~ 4 years. Hmm, bit too long but once it gets going easy to build cheap camps fast like the Aussies. The Germans had a similar problem.
Of course I sincerely hope this dark view is way wrong!
I suspect that the Brit reaction if this ever came about would be rather interesting. Remember Oliver Cromwell?
If you listen to the CJ Hopkins podcast with Jeremy Nell – and I know I’ve posted about this before – you will hear that a German broadcaster said that the unvaccinated were like an appendix “unnecessary for human life”, echoing in a rather precise way the view of a Nazi doctor in his description of the Jews.
Yes, we have now exceeded “hate crime” and we are in the realms of incitement to violence, which (in my view quite rightly) are crimes. But sadly not ones the police force will be interested in.
Sadly atrocities need to be committed before a “minority” group is considered for protected status.
But only after a world war and the defeat of the tyrants.
I’m all for atrocities…..
“Incitement to genocide” more like …pure Nazi!
Surely it is, but it’s ominous that the HR lawyers who would be all over this if it was a ‘race hate’ crime (indefensible by itself) are deafening by their silence. Basically it looks like they have been bought and paid for.
HR in the UK has only ever been a Leftist agenda to allow illegal immigrants to stay in the country a the cost to the taxpayer of Legal Aid.
( Isn’t this how Blair’s wife made her money before becoming a “Judge”?)
I have it on good authority that is the case. The big law firms consider it toxic and an end to their business. Therefore most individuals see it as career ending. When you consider how keen they were to take tenuous cases that reflected badly on the UK …
It is “Hate Crime” – but Johnson has suspended Law ‘n Order for all members of his Cabal!
(Judges hiding under their desks)
It is. If you follow Neil Clarke on twitter, you will know he is reporting the likes of Brady and Neil to the police for their rhetoric. You can do the same too.
Make sure to report these crimes so that they can be prosecuted. I bet that if a few of those especially vocal inciters get a court invitation, they will shut their filthy mouth in public.
Don’t worry – rest assured, the Police will be assiduous in investigating each instance. As they speed to accost each incident, determined to arrest any and all offenders, homes get burgled, motorists speed, people get assaulted and drug dealers openly sell killer pills to kids.
“We have to set our priorities and use our resources to confront the reality of hate crime”
Bulletin from the Daily Bullshitter, only MSM on the planet Zog, quoting Chief Constable Twat from Wokeshire Constabulary
Another one falling for the lie that lockdowns make a difference to hospitalisation rates. It’s bollocks! If it were true this would be visible in the stats, which it isn’t.
There’s some limited evidence that the most stringent of lockdowns (no-one doing anything ever) can suppress covid to a certain extent. Beyond that ‘behaviour control measures’ seem to have made very little impact on the spread of the disease.
I’m not sure that I would agree with that assessment, what about Peru?
Just suck it up and save civilisation.
The objective is now obviously to destroy civilisation.
That will be the result intended or not. It’s going to be very, very ugly.
David,
House arrest and not going out will only delay the inevitable viral surge when countries come to their senses and let people get on with their lives.
Lockdowns don’t work and cause more harm than good.
As per your “handle” you are assuming there is some intent or desire by our politicians to get back to normal – there is not. They want collapse so they can save us with slavery.
No such thing as a virus as microbiologist Stefan Lanka will attest, along with a number of MDs who value scientific integrity, like Tom Cowan, Andy Kaufman and Sam Bailey.
The Daily Sceptic is a serious website created to expose lies and propaganda particularly about Covid.
Your inane comments that “viruses do not exist” are unwelcome.
It is difficult enough to persuade the public that the response to Covid has been blown out of proportion.
Your idiotic belief that “viruses do not exist” makes that task harder and divides the sceptic community.
I have paid money to Toby Young to keep The Daily Sceptic going and your comments that “viruses do not exist” undermines the integrity of this website putting its future in jeopardy.
There has never been an article on here suggesting viruses do not exist.
Those promoting the theory that “viruses do not exist” have been totally debunked.
Lanka, Kaufman, Cowan, Bailey, Icke, Rappoport, Adams etc. have books, pills, lotions and potions to sell to the gullible.
Please take your inane comments to somewhere like the David Icke website where they belong.
If at a very very early stage. Once thousands are infected I would imagine it’s not just pointless but possibly counter productive as you force infected into confined environments with uninfected.
They don’t care. They don’t want optimal health outcomes, they want ultimate power.
Just pointless as there is no such thing as a contagious disease.
If covid hospitalisations were reduced to zero, the NHS and its hospitals would still be in crisis in the winter. Most people are not in hospital because of covid.
Where is your evidence of the spread of the ‘disease’?
Positive Fraudulent PCR tests run at 40 plus cycles of amplification – which still cannot detect a viral infection in anyone. ( See Keri Mullis who invented the PCR test!)
Yet still they use them to hype up the numbers!
We can no longer trust any Government statistics on anything!
The qPCR reaction will not be linear across the full cycle range. it’s typically linear for between 5-10 cycles max which is why you adjust the cDNA ( made from the mRNA) concentration to ensure your target gene comes up in this range. We know that they have CT values between 20 and 40+ so you cannot really compare samples. Maybe science has changed since I published ?
twinkytwonk you appear to have some knowledge.
PCR tests for base sequences? How do we know they are unique to the virus? Of course it is impossible to be 100% certain but has anyone tried to get a feel for this. I heard that at least one of the PCR tests uses a sequence that has been found in a human chromosome. Of course as per Kary Mullis if they wind the cycles up you’re a) going to be detecting all sorts of stuff from the millions of organisms that live inside and stuff we may have ingested and b) I hear that also, due to technical considerations of the way the tests work, high cycle thresholds increase the error rate massively?
I heard that at least one of the PCR tests uses a sequence that has been found in a human chromosome. This may just be a misunderstanding of how PCR works. PCR uses two primers that match relatively short sequences at each end of a longer sequence. Because the primers are short sequences it’s highly likely that individually they will match all sorts of things including parts of the human genome. But for the “chain reaction” part of PCR to work, both primers need to match opposite ends of a longer sequence, and that shouldn’t happen with the human chromosome. Without the chain reaction, the human chromosome fragment would be amplified linearly, that is to say after 40 cycles you would have just 40 copies (they would also be of random length, because there’s no second primer to tell the process when to stop), whereas the actual target sequence would have 2^40 copies.
The PCR test does/cannot test for the whole genomic sequence….unless the short sequences are unique to SARS COV2, and/or the sample cannot successfully be cultured, how can these “litmus” tests be relied on?
Casedemic all over again. It is totally dishonest of those in positions of authority with the power to ruin peoples lives and livelihoods to continue to trot out the narrative when the reality of these data has been long established but ignored.
If lockdown was severe enough to significantly slow the spread of an airborne virus the country would come to an immediate halt, people would start starving followed by anarchy that would impact the elite. Can you imagine 70 million fighting for scraps the whole country would be torn to shreds. The elite would have nothing to rule and no one to rebuild it for them. They could ask Xi Jinping and Putin but they aren’t going to give it back to the elite are they?
It is all total bollocks – all of it!
(Except for the shocking level of suppressed serious vaccine injury, including the deaths of young men from myocarditis and the number of patients undiagnosed and untreated by our hospitals, and the number of lockdown suicides.)
I can’t understand how the lockdowns managed to totally eliminate the flu virus but nothing else?
It will be used as cover for vaccine deaths after the booster. Lockdowns can only slow things down and even for that there is little evidence as others have highlighted.
Indeed.
I thought this thread was about this BBC reporter.
I got as far as ‘(BBC) committed to impartiality’ and spilled my coffee.
The idea that this poor little blinkered lamb expected the beeb to be unbiased and allow debate is so funny as to be comedy.
Has he not seen/heard their coverage of the non existent global warming ‘crisis’ or their (non)coverage of underage sex crimes ‘up north’ or the invasion on the south coast?
As the senile so called President Joe Bama would say
Come on man!
Robin Aitken has already spilled the bans in his polemical “The Noble Liar”
Its essentially the same for much of the MSM. Even with the Telegraph, IMHO they ‘allow’ certain popular columnists to say their peace – though within boundaries (note that none have NOT had the jab), whilst simultaneously the Gates-sponsored ‘Global Health Security’ section and often the science section pumps out the government/civil service ‘experts’/big pharma/Establishment/globalist cabal propaganda on COVID, mostly with zero comments allowed or is heavily moderated. Note that today’s ‘article by Sajid Javid had no reader comments allowed. This sort of blatant censorship – which I suspect means no COVID-vaccine sceptics get a look in on their Letters Page either – is essentially like the social media giants disallowing similar commentary and opinion videos on their platforms – it shuts down all debate and silences even critics who are experts in the field. With TV news and radio, it is just more obvious, but too many normies are scared of the repracussions of speaking out – even mildly, and so don’t and often bat for teh authoritarians when in public or with friends/family/work colleagues, because they never know who migh snitch on them if they say what they really think. The current situation is getting nearer and nearer… Read more »
There is indeed a war. The elites who run the world are waging war on us.
Exactly!
I think we should stop calling them “elites”. You wouldn’t call a particularly fat tapeworm “elite”, would you?
The BBC have very active moderators who don’t allow any dissenting voices.
Same with The Guardian.
The comments on The Daily Telegraph and Daily Mail are mostly anti-lockdown and mandatory jab sceptical, thankfully.
They all take money from Gates.
See also more hysterical Government propaganda lies currently onTV!
It’s a good rule of thumb that the more aggressively something is censored, the bigger the lies being protected.
If vaccines were so self-evidently positive and wonderful, those who criticised them would be ignored for their foolishness. Not unlike the oddballs that stand on street corners proclaiming the end of the world is coming (if they even exist eny more).
The aggressive, ruthless censorship of vaccine criticism is a clear sign that they are not just not what they proclaim to be, but probably really quite dangerous.
There just isn’t any time in history that we can look back on where the freedom to speak freely was ruthlessly suppressed and we think: yes, censorship protected the truth there, that was a good thing. It just doesn’t happen. Whenever we look back on moments of free speech censorship in history they were moments were the truth was suppressed and good people suffered at the hands of bad people.
Well, I’m pretty sure Hitler’s propaganda was heavily censored in all allied states during WW2. Would you say it was not for good?
Oddly enough the Nazi’s had a propaganda magazine called Signal, written in English for western audiences, that was being distributed in the USA as late as 1943. It’s little known because it’s been virtually ignored by historians but there’s a thesis on it here. It was written in flawless English and had a high production with quality colour photos.
Perhaps one reason it’s been ignored is that the articles were not obviously propaganda, being much more nuanced than most typical Nazi writing of the time, and it focused the messaging on the importance and moral rectitude of creating of a German-led “European Community”, which – they argued – was necessary to save Europe from irrelevance and decline.
The extent of the fight in the US by Roosevelt and Churchill, enacted by Bill Stephenson and others, against NAZI infiltration and propaganda in the Americas leading up to and beyond Pearl Harbour is detailed somewhat in Bill Stevenson’s “A man called intrepid” – other sources are available.
Telegraph funded by Gates…they need the money.
Today’s Telegraph has been depressing reading, with more than the usual amount of covid crap. Jabbit’s both quoted and allowed his own column space. The back cover is one big ad ‘Get Boosted Now’. Not that long ago they got rid of the anti-woke Julie Burchill for no good reason and I wonder how long it’ll be before Daniel Hannan is ditched too. I was a long-term reader of the Mail but that got beyond the pail and I stopped taking it. Now I guess I’ll give up on the Telegraph too. They’re all in the same boat!
Yes it seems the financial control lines have been put in place everywhere.
Brilliant – the Mail belongs in the bucket! (pail)
As I wrote in an article that the DS put in its daily roundup (“Control the Language, Control the World”), many people now censor themselves.
These people KNOW they will experience personal or professional harm if they say what they really think. So Big Brother doesn’t really have to work that hard any more.
My impression is that in professional contexts people self-censor to avoid wasting time. At least where I work covid has become a taboo topic, in the same category as religion and politics (both of which it really is).
Spot on, which is the reason we watch gbnews. See the latest Neil Oliver with Dr Malone. Pretty good.
Mea culpa – I buy the DT – but only for the crossword and the letters page, honest; but the biggest contribution the DT makes is the vast difference they make as bedding for the local hedgehog sanctuary – a fitting ecological contribution counterpoint to the bullshit articles you cite.
Enlightening conversation here with some good brains talking Covid and offering a far more attractive vision of medicine, solutions and also looks at shedding which is still an important topic
DOCTOR’S PANEL – Andrew Kaufman – Carrie Madej – Lawrence Palevsky – Tom Cowan – Vaccine Shedding
https://www.bitchute.com/video/s0ki1qmO5Cu2/
More attractive than the militarised, biosecurity driven nightmare (which is currently giving us carcinogenic swabs, death and disease causing jabs, wireless radiation everywhere) version of medicine which is beholden to the amoral corporate cesspit of Big Pharma vampires
Kaufman is snake oil salesman and Cowan had to hand in his medical license for malpractice on a cancer patient.
Both are charlatans selling pills, lotions and potions to the gullible.
You need to do much better than these cheap shots and lowlife smear attempts because these people are putting out so much amazing information which is going to destroy the discredited nefarious Big Pharma model once and for all. Which is why they need people like you to derail the threads, because these people offer a fresh vision of a world where people take ownership of their lives, their health, their food, their spirit….. They envision a world where we rely much more on ourselves as sovereign beings, not the evil, criminal and fraudulent mantra of the misleaders and genuine charlatans and snake oil salesmen peddling these murderous injections which also maim and are set to destroy the health of vast quantities of people. but you keep peddling that world……
The Daily Sceptic is a serious website created to expose lies and propaganda particularly about Covid.
Your inane comments and links to charlatans that “viruses do not exist” are unwelcome.
It is difficult enough to persuade the public that the response to Covid has been blown out of proportion.
Your idiotic belief that “viruses do not exist” makes that task harder and divides the sceptic community.
I have paid money to Toby Young to keep The Daily Sceptic going and your belief that “viruses do not exist” undermines the integrity of this website putting its future in jeopardy.
There has never been an article on here suggesting viruses do not exist.
Please take your inane comments to somewhere like the David Icke website where they belong.
I do think he’s a 77er who wants to “UFO” us
You people have nothing but smearing and conjecture to offer. Its childish, to be quite honest. These are serious subjects which deserve open and honest debate and scrutiny. The kind of thing I would expect to be welcomed by the purveyors of the Free Speech Union
The reality is these people are hardcore into real science and real health – they are calling out the establishment for their antiscientific methods and assertions. I never said viruses dont exist, you made that up (no surprise there because thats how you people roll), but I am saying that SARS COV 2 and Covid19 is a complete fraud based on fraudulent science underpinned by nothing but assertion and brainwashing and bogus methods and data, built on lies and deceit, for which the law of the land was perverted. If you are happy for the world to be turned upside down when the evidence suggests these people are lying, fine, but im not that gullible. You can try to smear me, call me whatever, im genuinely interested in establishing the facts and that means venturing into territory not approved by the usual suspects and calling into question the blatant criminal entity that is Big Pharma and modern medicine and the governments they collude with to bring us crimes like Convid – which just delivered the most murderous health destroying injection ever – which even if you believe the lies about a new virus – is only a low mortality rate… Read more »
Prof Dr John Ioannidis believes viruses exist and SARS-CoV-2 is real.
He also believes, like the rest of us, that Covid has been blown out of proportion.
No reputable scientist believes “viruses do not exist” so please take your ridiculous theories to another website.
Sorry but who the hell are you to tell me what to think and write. Youre like something out of Orwells nightmares – the Thought Police. These are not ridiculous theories they are the result of advanced analysis of the real world and the scientific literature – the only ridiculous theory is that there is a novel virus worthy of all this madness.
Here is Kaufman debating Mikovits on virus isolation. I would like to see alot more of this kind of discussion :
The Best Virology Lesson Ever – Kaufman challenges Mikovits to prove viral isolation-she can’t
https://www.bitchute.com/video/nfRJIS4ULZr1/
Andrew vs Judy – Do Viruses Exist? The FULL Info ONLY HERE
https://www.bitchute.com/video/VrKEiqAOw9gE/
I have seen the video of Kaufman and Dr Judy Mikovits and Kaufman was a complete and utter disgrace. It was hardly a discussion or a debate and Mikovits did well not to get any more angry at the slurs from Kaufman. The fractured Zoom meeting was supposed to be about the danger of the Covid experimental jabs. Kaufman hijacked the meeting to self publicise his ridiculous belief that viruses do not exist. Mikovits assumed Kaufman has some knowledge of virology and that is why she was using technical terms which Kaufman admitted on video that he did not understand. As anyone with an ounce of virology knowledge can testify viruses cannot be isolated in the dictionary sense of the word because they are only evident when they are attached to a cell. Kaufman should know this. It is like someone who doesn’t understand science asking for a photograph of gravity to prove it exists. Virologists have “isolated” viruses millions of times by showing them in a single living cell. Viruses cannot exist without that cell. The “whole gene sequence” of viruses are also now known. Kaufman is a psychiatrist and is very good at persuading people that black is… Read more »
This is a scientific debate, in progress. I would like to see Lanka and co having discussions with people like Robert Malone. Science is a process of developing understanding of the world. You dont achieve that by being a narrow minded bigot entrenched in dogma. The established order is being challenged and they have been exposed as corrupt – not least of which is in this current scamdemic which is all based on lies and fraud. The notion that we have seen a super aggressive transmissible novel virus sweeping the world in the last 2 years or so is blatantly false. They have done nothing but lie to people and build fraudulent narratives on lies and deceit. If your vision for the world is more of this bullshit then fine, but the human race will rise above this and soon these crooks will be in jail for their crimes against we the people.
Here is the MHRA confirming this whole affair is built on nothing but computer models and bullshit science:
EMAIL EXCHANGE WITH UK MHRA – Exposing the genomic sequence of SARSCov2
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/email-exchange-with-uk-mhra-exposing-the-genomic-sequence-of-sarscov2/
Lanka is a moron shunned by the scientific community who don’t wish to waste their valuable time on him.
Watch out, you are so open minded that your brains is about to fall out.
Its reputable scientists bringing us this shitshow, so listening to only the already established order about the system they helped to create is narrow minded
I would rather listen to “reputable scientists” and the “established order” of Mike Yeadon, Dr Andrew Wakefield, Judy Mikovitz, Prof John Ioannidis etc. etc. who all know viruses exist.
Not the crackpots you listen to like Stefan Lanka, Andrew Kaufman, Tom Cowan, Sam Bailey etc.
These people have seduced others in the alternative media without a medical or scientific background but who also have books to sell and websites to fund to support their spurious 19th century claims and that “viruses do not exist”. People like David Icke, Jon Rappaport, Mike Adams etc.
There is I believe a halfway house that claims terrain activates viruses or perhaps a better way of putting it is; a poor environment (pollutants, poor health, advancing years) degrades the bodies ability to manage viruses.
It is well known that cellular stress triggers new genomic information as well as increased exosome activity. Exosomes, by the way, are particles that are actually isolated (i.e. purified) using sucrose density gradient centrifugation and followed with EM. So the claim of the guy above that isolation “cannot be done” is simply false. They can purify allegedly pathogenic viruses in just the same way as they do with phages and exosomes. The fact that they choose not to speaks volumes.
I heard recently that Delta and Omicron had now been isolated? Part of the work John Campbell has just highlighted on YT that gives a hypothesis on why Omicron is more transmissible but less virulent.
I don’t think so. It would be a radical first if they had truly “isolated” anything of this nature. It’s as ‘ComeTheRevolution’ says. The techniques being applied do not prove anything. For all of the ‘variants’ of Sars CoV-2 (and the original) they’re doing tissue culturing in VERO cells. With this, there’s no way to know what the source of your RNA is.
Yes, unhealthy lifestyles and exposure to pollutants will make it more likely one will catch a virus.
I have an understanding of modern virology and have no time for people who say that “viruses do not exist”.
It’s a long-standing business model of charlatans to convince their victims their rational “competitors” are lying to them. As you can see in your own person, this marketing tool works very well.
Once again with the copy / paste argument with no relevance to what ComeTheRevolution said.
Twice now the incorrect inference they claimed viruses don’t exist.
You make these exact same set of arguments everytime, word for word! You’re a bot / 77th!
Why should I waste my time typing out a reply each time you morons spout your “viruses don’t exist” rubbish when it is easier to copy and paste a stock reply?
This is a clear admission that you are a paid shill. Real people dont have stock replies. Only the likes of 77th or other nefarious actors have stock replies. Cover blown, you are a confirmed paid operative
And where it gets interesting is that you are so focused on trying to counter the “no virus” narrative – which means we are on to something. Tick tock, your system of evil is crumbling
You’re paranoid.
I have argued with nutters like you on other forums and have a wealth of scientific material proving that viruses exist that I can copy and paste to save me keep typing it each time.
It is people like you with your ridiculous belief that “viruses do not exist” who are harming the fight against this tyranny.
If anyone new to The Daily Sceptic looks at your comments, and by the other nutters on here, that “viruses do not exist” they may dismiss this website as a valuable resource.
When you are so kooky that even kooks don’t want to play with you, maybe it is time to reconsider.
I’ve seen you make these exact same comments to myself and other people several times over several months now – word for word.
Either your argumentative vocabulary is very limited, or you’re a bot / 77th Brigade c*nt, stirring it up in favour of the clot shot.
Fauci, Emails, and Some Alleged Science
https://www.aier.org/article/fauci-emails-and-some-alleged-science/
This is a very interesting expose of the malevolent strategy by Fauci et al and their attempt to take down the GBD
The fact the radio host mentioned in the above article talked over the ‘antivaxer’ then cut him off shows that those who have concerns about the jabs have won the argument. When presented with a reasoned case the vaccine loving host was unable to counter with anything sensible and instead resorted to childish behaviour and ultimately cut the caller off
Do any of us pay its licence fee? Or listen to it?I I stopped listening at least ten years ago.
I note the irony of an article describing how the major media outlet in the country has been suppressing balanced information being presented to the public.
Which then goes on to discuss statistics about the public’s opinion on related matters.
Balanced means exploring the idea that Covid is a scam from top to bottom, held up by nothing other than fraudulent science and corruption and control of the media. This is a crime scene and all leads should be followed up, not fall prey to the dogma that exists in the minds of people who have spent their lives being brainwashed by these monsters and their systems of control, existing in their warped antihuman version of reality
Replace the word ‘unvaccinated’ with ‘Jew’ or ‘Jewish’, and then you are transported back in time to the 1930’s and where negative utterances about the unvaccinated truly belong. It is truly disgusting.
Totally, beyond belief!
Yeah, it’s frightening and most of the population think it can’t happen here. It’s happening!
“Because THIS time the science and politics is correct!”
Defund the BBC. Who even watches TV these days?
Nobody that I know. Mostly people are sick and tired of the propaganda and lickspittle by the likes of Kuennsburg et al. Only stories worth reading are those online by Nick Triggle who has played a fairly straight bat throughout.
The gentry.
Why do you need a BBC to have journalism or television? Why do we need a CDC or NIH in America to advance “public health?”
“Gealth” would be BETTER if these agencies didn’t exist or never existed. I guess we had smart doctors before we had these agencies. It’s just like my parents somehow got a superior education to my own back in the days before there was a U.S. Department of Education.
Not “Gealth” but “health” … although I think we need better Gealth too.
Email received last year from Michael Wendling of the BBC Misinformation Unit (he thinks he’s combating it but he’s actually creating it) regarding my complaint that coverage of an anti-lockdown protest was not balanced. It demonstrates very neatly that he and people like him think they know better than the public they serve and that pay their wages, and have no interest in balance or truth or freedom of speech, only in pushing the views that they decide are acceptable:
“Of course those who believe in conspiracy theories are not going to call their beliefs conspiracy theories, and are going to call themselves mainstream, moderate people.
We viewed footage of the speakers and spoke to people who were there.
We have no obligation to give a platform to erroneous ideas. We don’t, to take an extreme example, broadcast the manifestos of mass murderers alongside police statements so that people can “make up their own minds”.
I’m not saying the people there were violent. Some of them were (as the story reflected) were drawn by legitimate concerns. But the speakers (Mr Icke and others) were not expressing mainstream views that would benefit from airing and debate. “
Yes – very revealing comments from a shuttered mind that cannot appreciate the blatant ironies in what he’s saying.
Imagine continuing to subject Galileo to the same criterion. That’s their ‘science’ – the Beeb as the Vatican.
They’re saying that they are the arbitrators of truth.
Mike Wendling of BBC Disinformation is very unpleasant on twitter. His approach to information is disturbing – Orwellian in the extreme.
He has been called out on this many times.
https://twitter.com/mwendling
I have heard radio presenters (not BBC) who have made it pretty clear that they believe anyone who is ‘unvaccinated’ is either stupid/ignorant/brainwashed, evil/antisocial, or insane. One hosted a phone-in, in which concerned listeners voiced their frustration about friends, spouses, etc, who would not have the jab. The presenter ended each call by expressing surprise and wonder that they could possibly continue to maintain a relationship with the loved one in question – because she couldn’t.
If you are against MANDATORY Covid vaccines, you are an “antivaxxer,” but also a “science denier.” Furthermore, you are a person who could “harm” many others by sharing your views and, as such, should be silenced or sanctioned.
It’s amazing how rapidly our language and vocabulary has been modified to justify our “New Normal.”
I tried to expand on this theme in this piece, but this glossary of “newspeak” is only partial.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/12/orwell_was_right_control_the_language_control_the_world.html
This anti-vaxxer has had all sorts of vaccines of the old variety. This one I researched because it didn’t “smell” right and decided not for me as my chances of surviving COVID was pretty good. That was a good decision.
Hmm, so I am unvaccinated, have had COVID and therefore far better immunity than vaxed who are now all falling ill with COVID, I hear about more everyday. Oh and COVID was not as bad as flu and when I had flu I was a lot fitter.
But … I doubt they will accept my immunity as reason not to vax. That tells me it’s poison.
I note the author still falls into the trap of thinking that there has been an unprecedented health crisis, rather than a disastrous political crisis.
The waking up process is slow and bit by bit.
Savile, Dr Kelly’s murder, Iraq War, Martin Bashir, I could go on. I’m sorry but if this BBC journalist couldn’t quite figure out he’s working for the devil spell transmitter.
Many people in the field knew deaths were in normal range from late May 2020. If he wants to regain a modicum of trust investigate December 2019 to April 2020 deaths from the drug beginning with M.
I don’t think we are supposed to talk about all the wars fought to preserve “freedom” … or any harm to “public health” these wars may have caused in, say, hundreds of thousands of innocent children.
The biggest lie in the history of mass media: “Why you can trust BBC News“
The public get what they deserve. For decades, as a society, we have been demanding more and more public services and watched government overspend and ratchet up an unpayable debt.
Our public services are unafforadable, the NHS is a giant, corrupt, unaffordable leviathan. And if the public insists on having it, then lockdowns and other forms of state abuse is what we can expect.
The BBC is an another gigantic, corrupt monster designed to protect the establishment and it needs to be broken up or simply abolished.
The establishment and its leaders treat the general public with disdain because we have no self respect as a society. The crappier the job they do, the more abusive the relationship between state and public, the more we demand from them and the more power we put in their hands.
I have to laugh at this sort of crap, when we’re in the middle of a blatant takeover of society by global private capital, and the corruption of the public sphere by it.
Wake up.
That is, and always has been the bottom line and the ultimate goal. It’s a financial coup d’etat by global institutional investors such as Blackrock, Vanguard and Statestreet all who have shareholding’s in big Pharma. And who has shareholding’s in these global investors? Well the Gates foundation is just one. Funny that!
Which part exactly is crap then?
All of it!
Maybe but where does China sit in this?
The way they have corrupted the institutions and replaced all real leadership with bureaucrats, destroyed morale, confused the lower levels of police and military. It’s creating an open door.
The NHS HAS to be binned before it kills us.
It truly is the worst treatment funded in the worst way, with the worst incentives and the worst outcomes.
IF you wanted to murder a countries economy and ruin a countries health you’d set up a National bad lifestyle subsidy system funded by fining people for working then staff it with virtue signalling pretend do-gooders and channel tons of cash at patent holders.
The bureaucrat-directed extortion-funded systems have to be ended ASAP. They are just not fit for any place that calls itself civilised
Knock me down with a feather! I’d never have guessed that the BBC is full of bias, overpaid Socialists and, given past performance, people of dubious morals. It is evident to most that they follow the line of the governing Party they hate, only to stave off being “defunded”. Altogether, a parcel of weedy yet dangerous and anti-democratic rogues, stealing from the public.
The BBC are paid agents of this state. They despise alternative opinions and crush all those who express them. It’s a cuddly Propaganda Ministry at best, a barefaced coven of professional liars and brainwashers at worst.
The fact that a BBC journalist has at last attempted to put out another point of view is encouraging.
God knows how this journalist goes to work each day. I couldn’t do it. The situation must be unbearably depressing.
More people in various areas appear to be starting to speak out, I’m hoping they are the astute ones who can see the narrative falling apart and are protecting their backs before the dam breaks.
The Monsters appear be going for broke – their hysterical invective has reached new depths of absurdity and blatant lies.
If they’ve been jabbed their own health may be falling apart too.
I’m guessing the post 5 month “negative protection” from being jabbed doesn’t just apply to WuFlu….
In the same way that thousands if not millions get jabbed, wear masks and generally eat copious amounts of shit on a regular basis.- by force of need.
Very few people are independent. Most are modern day serfs that simply couldn’t survive or even want to survive by independent means.
What a total national disaster. This disgraceful attempt to hype up the predicted ‘new variant’ ( who could have guessed?) is saturated by hysterical, hyperbolic lies from every Government politician – the object, as we all know, is to wreck Christmas and destroy thousands of businesses while the Globalist Billionaires reap the profits in the fire sales. Covid has seen a massive transfer of wealth from the Middle class to the super rich – as intended. This is just the next stage of their Master Plan. The darkness of the agenda being followed by the British Establishment against its own people seems to know no limits. Mr Gates should be detained for questioning for his Global role in engineering this fake pandemic via the fraudulent PCR test and the WHO, which he bankrolls to pursue his own dark agendas of vaccines and eugenics for the planet and its people. But sadly it seems there is now no-one left to detain him. Sadly there seem to be no Global Health Institutions left that have not taken his shilling to pursue his objectives . What chance have we got given the level of corruption we face and the thorough brainwashing of the… Read more »
Evening folks. Just been on the BBC website. Been looking for the evidence of exponential growth in cases. I am really not very good at Data, and looked at the Ministry of Truth’s daily counts and seems that it’s not doubled every 2 days. This can’t be right as Prof. Whitty said it would double. Please help. I want the Government to be right ever so much.
Soon, like a miracle, the exponential growth will switch gears to an exponential decline – as happened with every previous covid “wave”. Of course, the exponential decline will not be deemed newsworthy by then.
More whistleblowers please
Nothing good will happen without them. So, suck it up, and come forward.
What is the past experience of whistleblowers from, say, within the NHS…?
“A brilliant expose!” claims TY in breathless prose. Yeah, how about “No” Tobes? This bloke is about as far from us lockdown sceppies as it’s possible to be. His only gripe with his employer seems to be one of politeness in allowing the odd person to speak against the narrative (and that’s only callers; not anyone presenting or representing the BBC). I take it he’s still employed there?
I’d give it more credence if he wrote under his own name. I’ve got more admiration for a care assistant on minimum wage who’s worried about where next April’s money to pay the bills is coming from but is still taking a stand by not being jabbed. Much more admiration.
Not the least problem with this alleged Damascene conversion of “Charlie Washlamb” as I shall call him, is that he appears to have not previously (or even now) noticed that the BBC has, for all the current Millennium, been a major promoter of Glowbull Warming lies with increasing stridency, despite Climategate, despite the fact that there has been virtually NO warming this Millennium, despite the fact that even the politically driven IPCC’s latest report is reluctant to find significant coincidence (let alone causation) between CO² levels and bad weather.
The ongoing disaster of Ruinable Energy with costs increasing faster than a Chris Whitty graph and collapse of the Grid a question of ‘when’ not ‘if’, is also ignored.
How old is he? 14?
And, as for the public’s alleged enthusiasm for Lockdowns, obviously those like the Teachers and Civil ‘Servants’ who enjoy sitting at home on full pay, have we forgotten the Brexit Referendum and the last two US Presidential Elections? Were the results close to the ‘Opinion Polls’?
Despite obvious ballot stuffing?
The establishment mouthpiece is the BBC.
Why would they question the way to funnel VAST sums of wealth from ordinary taxpayers into establishment bank accounts via these low energy, i.e. high land use power “sources” justified by claiming plant-food is a pollutant.?
I picked up on this interesting wording from the whistleblower:
(The BBC has been) … guilty only of a form of noble cause corruption,”
There we probably have it. Yes, they are censoring dissenting views, but they are doing it for a “noble cause.”
I’m sure this is the way many journalists and editors justify their editorial decisions.
This “Noble cause journalism” is going to end up killing a lot of people and is already ruining the world. Needless to say, this is the opposite of a noble cause.
“The end justifies the means… For the greater good”, etc etc.
All Utilitarian / Communitarian denial of the rights of the citizen.
The road to Hell is paved with good intentions…
Nope, theyre just a bunch of lying pieces of filth, and thats being kind to them
The BBC has lost its mind. It is useless as a democratic public service and has become a totalitarian propaganda machine. I guess it is positioning itself to thrive after the “Great Reset”.
Our healthcare system is about to experience a tsunami! Potential side effects of jabs include chronic inflammation, because the vaccine continuously stimulates the immune system to produce antibodies. Other concerns include the possible integration of plasmid DNA into the body’s host genome, resulting in mutations, problems with DNA replication, triggering of autoimmune responses, and activation of cancer-causing genes. Alternative COVID cures EXIST. Ivermectin is one of them. While Ivermectin is very effective curing COVID symptoms, it has also been shown to eliminate certain cancers. Do not get the poison jab. Get your Ivermectin today while you still can! https://ivmpharmacy.com
“the vaccine continuously stimulates the immune system to produce antibodies” Are you sure? Where did that from? I’ve been trying to find out if that was the case – it suggests that the cells “infected” by the vaccine continually produce the spike including after replication. I’m really not sure that is the case?
seen on YT IMAGINE we were living in medieval times…. and you’d been invited to a royal banquet. The ones in charge were extremely keen to get you to drink the wine. They were very insistent. You’d probably assume the wine was poisoned. “Drink this wonderful wine.” “No thank you.” “Be a good guest! Drink the wine. We uncorked it especially. It’s a beautiful and rare vintage.” “No thank you. I appreciate the offer though.” “Drink the wine. It’s very expensive but you can have a glass for free, and we’ll give you an extra plate of supper.” “No I’m fine as I am.” “Drink the wine and we’ll feed your entire village for a week and reduce your taxes.” “Wow all that for wine? What’s in it? Still, no thank you.” “We’ll make you a Duke.” “Very generous but no thanks I’m content in my home.” “You are not anti-wine are you????” “No I just don’t feel like drinking this wine this evening.” “Drink the damn wine or we’ll stop you working.” “Eh?” You notice they’re getting desperate now. “We’ll ban you from markets.” “Wow your tone has changed.” “Now you need to drink 3 glasses or we’ll stop… Read more »
Excellent allegory, well done!
Once upon a time it may have been worth watching but now I wouldn’t watch anything on the BBC not even if they paid me – I haven’t watched anything on the BBC for almost 15 years now – don’t even listen to their radio stations or visit their website – pretty much the same goes for all the mainstream channels like ITV, Channel4, Sky – in fact when they shut down the BBC I’m going to throw a fucking big party to celebrate.
I pray that the BBC will disappear up its own backside.
This is becoming a joke now …
Early Covid symptoms are no different to minor side effects from vaccines and people who develop a headache or fever after their jab should get tested, experts say.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10283647/Early-Covid-symptoms-clearly-differentiated-vaccine-effects-study-warns.html#comments
Yeah if people start dying in numbers from the vax they need something to blame. If the people wake up we’d have politicians hanging from lamp posts and the police and army helping hoist them up.
They are killing people and making people ill deliberately and blaming it on Convid. We have seen this with early mechanical ventilation, remdesevir, midazolam, withholding treatments and leaving people to deteriorate against all medical ethics and duties – and of course now the jabs are making people ill – all being blamed on Convid.
So true. This may have been posted elsewhere but there was another celebrity death this weekend…
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10326623/Carlos-Mar-n-dies-Covid-aged-53-Manchester-hospital-coma.html
Fully jabbed, young, seemingly healthy, not overweight. Only two days ago the reports were that he had been put in an induced coma but his management were in the process of rescheduling concert dates. My thoughts at the time were that he’d be lucky to get out of hospital alive. I’d put money on the ‘treatment’ killing him.
I suspect it flew beneath many people’s radar a few weeks ago that 10 patients at one of the London Nightingale hospitals had the wrong filters placed in their ventilators, resulting in the death of one patient and possibly two others. The others were only saved because of one of the deaths being investigated. Begs the question ‘How many more has this or similar happened to?’
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10084815/Staff-Londons-Nightingale-Hospital-contributed-death-Covid-patient.html
This whole country is a crme scene, thanks for the info its a very eye opening link. Here is a good article about fast tracking people to mechanical ventilation in the early days of the scamdemic. The Chinese Communist Party’s Global Lockdown Fraud https://ccpgloballockdownfraud.medium.com/the-chinese-communist-partys-global-lockdown-fraud-88e1a7286c2b 3. Deadly Recommendations for Early Mechanical Ventilation Came from China In early March 2020, the WHO released COVID-19 provider guidance documents to healthcare workers.[44] The guidance recommended escalating quickly to mechanical ventilation as an early intervention for treating COVID-19 patients, a departure from past experience during respiratory-virus epidemics.[45] In doing so, they cited the guidance being presented by Chinese journal articles, which published papers in January and February claiming that “Chinese expert consensus” called for “invasive mechanical ventilation” as the “first choice” for people with moderate to severe respiratory distress,[46] in part to protect medical staff. As the Wall Street Journal later reported: Last spring, doctors put patients on ventilators partly to limit contagion at a time when it was less clear how the virus spread, when protective masks and gowns were in short supply. Doctors could have employed other kinds of breathing support devices that don’t require risky sedation, but early reports suggested patients using… Read more »
Thanks for this info. Right from the start when I heard what Dr Kyle-Sidell said about ventilators I have been highly suspicious of the obsession with ventilators. My belief is that they are still being used to excess even now in this country for the same ‘precautionary’ reasons. I am also concerned that unvacccinated patients are being singled out for the ventilator treatment at the earliest opportunity either as tacit ‘punishment’ or because of the erroneous belief that they are a higher risk of spreading the virus. As we know, when such patients die they become, of course, a warning to the unvaccinated of the “dangers of covid and the importance of being vaccinated”. In late Spring 2020 I saw another IC doctor in New York expressing the same views as Cameron Kyle-Sidell. He actually said the instructions came from administrators in the belief that it would reduce staff shortages through enforced quarantine…nothing to do with the altruistic idea of protecting other patients. He added that any patient who can either converse with a doctor or is sufficiently responsive to respond to instructions (e.g. ‘touch your nose’, ‘put your right hand in the air’ etc) is not in need of… Read more »
The BBC is so dreadful that I can no longer follow its news and current affairs output without losing my rag, after having been an avid viewer and listener all of my adult life. Some people have put its lockdown bias down to OFCOM interference or declining standards of journalism. I am erring towards the view that the BBC is part of a wider generational and cultural shift. It aligns itself with those who believe that the planet is on the brink of destruction unless the UK ( but not China), immediately introduces ever more extrene draconian environment measures, that all unPC language (and people) are removed from the airwaves, and who demand that our collective historical memory is cleansed of all imperialist content etc. Is it any wonder that the Corporation has made such a fool of itself over Covid? The ultimate career goal of the average BBC staffer is to secure a high powered job in a Governnent Department or at the very least an NDPB. Sadly aside from GB news and talk radio, there is no counterbalance so the public get brainwashed.