Vaccine Safety Update

This is the 20th of the round-ups of Covid vaccine safety reports and news compiled by a group of medical doctors who are monitoring developments but prefer to remain anonymous in the current climate (find the 19th one here). By no means is this part of an effort to generate alarm about the vaccines or dissuade anyone from getting inoculated. It should be read in conjunction with the Daily Sceptic‘s other posts on vaccines, which include both encouraging and not so encouraging developments. At the Daily Sceptic we report all the news about the vaccines whether positive or negative and give no one advice about whether they should or should not take them. Unlike with lockdowns, we are neither pro-vaccine nor anti-vaccine; we see our job as reporting the facts, not advocating for or against a particular policy. The vaccine technology is novel and the vaccines have not yet fully completed their trials, which is why they’re in use under temporary and not full market authorisation. This has been done on account of the emergency situation and the trial data was largely encouraging on both efficacy and safety. For a summary of that data, see this preamble to the Government’s page on the Yellow Card reporting system. (Dr Tess Lawrie in June wrote an open letter to Dr June Raine, head of the MHRA, arguing that: “The MHRA now has more than enough evidence on the Yellow Card system to declare the COVID-19 vaccines unsafe for use in humans,” a claim that has been ‘fact checked’ here.) Boris Johnson said in October that being double vaccinated “doesn’t protect you against catching the disease, and it doesn’t protect you against passing it on”. We publish information and opinion to inform public debate and help readers reach their own conclusions about what is best for them, based on the available data.

Summary of Adverse Events in the U.K.

According to an updated report published on December 2nd, the MHRA Yellow Card reporting system has recorded a total of 1,298,826 events based on 395,049 reports. The total number of fatalities reported is 1,814.

  • Pfizer (24.5 million first doses, 20.8 million second doses) now has one Yellow Card in 179 people vaccinated. Deaths: 1 in 39,013 people vaccinated (628).
  • AstraZeneca (24.9 million first doses, 24.1 million second doses) has one Yellow Card in 105 people vaccinated. Deaths: 1 in 21,919 people vaccinated (1,136).
  • Moderna (1.5 million first doses, 1.3 million second doses) has one Yellow Card in 79 people vaccinated. Deaths: 1 in 83,333 people vaccinated (18).

Overall, one in every 129 people vaccinated (0.78%) have experienced a Yellow Card adverse event. The MHRA has previously estimated that the Yellow Card reporting rate may be approximately 10% of actual figures. Note that sometimes in Yellow Card reporting, the numbers of adverse events (including fatalities) will be lower than the previous week. The Yellow Card system is a passive reporting system, so in theory this should not happen as all reports should be cumulative. However, the MHRA say they analyse the data prior to publication, with deaths and pregnancy conditions being notably investigated. They do not state criteria by which reports would be removed and to date have not clarified why this data varies. It is therefore unclear how many reported adverse events have been removed from the reports since reporting began in February 2021.

  • Pulmonary Embolism & Deep Vein Thrombosis = 3,652
  • Anaphylaxis = 1,456
  • Acute Cardiac = 18,927
  • Myocarditis/Pericarditis = 1,313
  • Herpes = 4,570
  • Blindness = 447
  • Deafness = 654
  • Spontaneous Abortions = 639 miscarriages
  • Migraines & Headaches = 127,510
  • Central Nervous System Haemorrhage (Stroke) = 2,815
  • Guillain-Barré Syndrome = 543
  • Facial Paralysis incl. Bell’s Palsy = 1,898
  • Seizures = 3,067
  • Paralysis = 1,268
  • Tremor = 11,906
  • Reproductive/Breast Disorders = 47,391

Further analysis can be found via the UK Freedom Project.

Source: Pfizer; Moderna; AstraZeneca; Unspecified. “F” denotes fatal.
Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

43 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
RTSC
RTSC
4 years ago

And yet yesterday Johnson said “we may need to have a national conversation about mandatory vaccines.”

We can start that conversation with the information above. Tens of thousands of people being KILLED by these dangerous “vaccines” and millions injured.

huxleypiggles
4 years ago
Reply to  RTSC

When does any government ever have a “conversation?”

Utter BS from the Davos chief lackey.

Arfur Mo
Arfur Mo
4 years ago
Reply to  RTSC

Remove a legal immunity cover first, you slimeball (BJ not RTSC).

Then I will consider the question – and say no, hell no. Because it would permanently give away body integrity, making everyone (outside the ssmall group of insiders and their hangers-on) an indentured serf.

Hopeless
4 years ago

In a world not gone insane, this would be called “mass murder”.

BJs Brain is Missing
4 years ago

The day after Johnson’s disgraceful antics and I am still livid. How dare this tyrant introduce ‘vaccine’ passports and threaten mandatory ‘vaccinations’, and without even consulting Parliament or the People. Just who does he think he is? This is the stuff of Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Chavez.

You’ve picked a fight fat boy and you are going to get one.

Horse
Horse
4 years ago

Yes, the fat man has picked a fight. Ironically, given his obsession with Winston Churchill, he’s about to learn something of the British spirit when faced with vile tyranny.

TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
4 years ago
Reply to  Horse

He is just SO unlike Churchill it shows just how amazingly delusional Boris is.

Algie
Algie
4 years ago

The recent consultation regarding mandating vaccines for health workers was 65% against and yet the report simply ignores this, stating an ipsos mori poll saying there was a majority of the public in favour.
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/making-vaccination-a-condition-of-deployment-in-the-health-and-wider-social-care-sector

seems they have made their minds up.

dazren
dazren
4 years ago
Reply to  Algie

I completed that consultation and also the one on vaccine passports. I have come to the conclusion that these “consultations” are more theatre. They have the consultation so to be seen as doing the right thing and then – regardless of the outcome of the consultation – they will do whatever they want anyway.

TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
4 years ago
Reply to  dazren

portmanteau of con and insult?

loopDloop
loopDloop
4 years ago

‘By no means is this part of an effort to generate alarm about the vaccines or dissuade anyone from getting inoculated.’

Well, it should be. At what point does DS drop these ridiculous disclaimers. Take a stand.

A Y M
4 years ago

DELETE:
 By no means is this part of an effort to generate alarm about the vaccines or dissuade anyone from getting inoculated. It should be read in conjunction with the Daily Sceptic‘s other posts on vaccines, which include both encouraging and not so encouraging developments. At the Daily Sceptic we report all the news about the vaccines whether positive or negative and give no one advice about whether they should or should not take them. Unlike with lockdowns, we are neither pro-vaccine nor anti-vaccine; we see our job as reporting the facts, not advocating for or against a particular policy. “

There you go. No need for that waffle at this juncture. Evidence is in. These are not vaccines. These injections are a human catastrophe. No one not even those at deaths door should get these. Deaths increase in all age groups immediately following these injections. The long term health damage is unclear but repetitive application of “boosters” will very likely increase mortality rates as well as promote secondary disease.

At this point dancing around the fear of being labled an “anti vaxxer” is getting ridiculous.

Horse
Horse
4 years ago
Reply to  A Y M

I think they have to put all that in or several unpleasant men in trench coats pay the editor a visit at his home and let him browse through their catalogue: “101 Original Suicides”.

amanuensis
4 years ago

The paper on neurological damage after vaccination significantly underestimates the vaccine damage rate — this is because they only consider damage within 28 days of vaccination. There’s more about this here.

Horse
Horse
4 years ago

Anyone involved with giving these gene therapies to people, from the Prime Minister down to the nurses, is guilty of crimes against humanity. Children are having strokes for God’s sake. We won’t forget it. We know who is responsible. We will not allow you to destroy the evidence (the control group) by forcing them on every last person.

British PM and world-famous Winston Churchill impersonator Alexander Kemal, better known by his stage name Bojo Johnson, talks about having a national conversation on the subject of forcing these horrendous things on every last person.

Soon we will need a “national conversation” about mass civil disobedience.

John
4 years ago

The 5 year old had a severe congenital neurological deficit, .
Her bloods were severely deranged, she was acidotic with a lab pH of less than 6, a normal blood pH lies between 7.35 & 7.45, a person is considered acidotic if their pH is less than 7.35, which is still basic. so this poor girl was severely acidotic with acidic blood. This was irreversible and not conducive to life.

She was on home CPAP at night, clearly had sleep apnoea. She had had recent treatment for respiratory problems. This was a very poorly child under normal circumstances.
Was this the vaccine? Maybe (the report had to go in as it happened shortly after the vaccination)
She may have got into respiratory distress overnight there was no indication of whether she’d had her CPAP working, dad found her lifeless on the Monday morning, she may have been like that for an hour or so. Until there’s an autopsy we’ll never know.

John
4 years ago
Reply to  John

Further to my comment above, when I worked in childrens A&E a 10 year old girl was brought in by her dad, she’d been unwell and had a history of learning disability including seizures. I assessed her as being able to wait, she was interacting normally. About 20 minutes later dad came into the main department and told me the girl had become unwell, within five minutes she was being taken round to the resuscitation room and needed to be intubated by an anaesthetist. Had she been at home it’s unlikely that she would have survived.
That is how fast children go from being slightly unwell to crashing, they are able to compensate far better than adults.

The 5 year old in America may have looked okay after the vaccination but may have already been unwell, in fact she may have been unwell before the vaccination.

stewart
4 years ago

Thank you to the DS for keeping and publishing this fairly comprehensive record of adverse effects. I’m not sure anyone else in the world is doing this in the same thorough manner. It’s a real service to everyone.

AN other lockdown sceptic
AN other lockdown sceptic
4 years ago
Reply to  stewart

Seconded.

Deborah T
Deborah T
4 years ago

As I’ve said before, I thank God for you, Will, and hope that any reading this who are good people, in positions of power, will bring this to the attention of those who think they’re going to force/coerce/blackmail us into being injected.

NonCompliant
4 years ago

So who’s joining me in the gulag when I refuse the mandatory “vaccine” and refuse to pay any fines?

Given millions are still unspoiled they’ve got their work cut out in thinning the herd enough to be able to lock them all up.

artfelix
4 years ago
Reply to  NonCompliant

I’ve already made my decision – should Austria style mandates come in before I leave the country – that I will take prison thank you very much. And once I’ve been outlawed I intend to behave in every way like an outlaw.

Davke
4 years ago

Take the needle and stick it in their fucking eye. Job done!

ComeTheRevolution
ComeTheRevolution
4 years ago

The blood of the jabbed has been posioned. ALL of the jabbed are showing this in the blood. These jabs are attempted genocide. Any talk of mandating this is clearly criminal and an act of war and treason.

UNVAXXD BLOOD:
comment image

VAXXD BLOOD:
comment image

SOURCE:

Researchers Present Strange Vax Microscopy Findings & Blood Comparisons
https://www.bitchute.com/video/BDz8rPPlRo1N/

ComeTheRevolution
ComeTheRevolution
4 years ago

What the hell is going on……this stuff is proven to not work and is bloody dangerous. There is no virus sweepiong the land killing people. How can this be happening. We need to get out there speakign to people and putting info into their hands. PM says ‘conversation’ must be had about mandatory vaccines in UK https://www.lbc.co.uk/hot-topics/coronavirus/boris-johnson-conversation-mandatory-vaccines/ Prime Minister Boris Johnson has said there is a “conversation” to be had about mandatory coronavirus vaccinations in the UK, saying the Government cannot keep restrictions going “indefinitely” because some people do not want to get vaccinated. When asked by a member of the public whether the Government was considering introducing mandatory vaccines, as other European countries have, Mr Johnson said: “I said right at the beginning of this pandemic that… I didn’t want us to have a society and a culture where we force people to get vaccinated, I don’t think that’s ever been the way we do things in this country.” But he then said: “I think that there is going to come a point – if we can show that the vaccines are capable of holding the Omicron, and that’s the key thing that I think we need to test… Read more »

ComeTheRevolution
ComeTheRevolution
4 years ago

This is just a load of wishy washy bullshit being used to justify the most extreme form of tyranny imagineable.

kate
kate
4 years ago

“A substantial proportion of the population”

Sounds as if more people than they wish to admit have decided not to get injected.
Authoritative statistical estimates I have heard range up to 22 million unvaxxed.

ComeTheRevolution
ComeTheRevolution
4 years ago
Reply to  kate

Its very hard to tell. A lot have been jabbed, no doubt about it. It seems most have done it, and they have conned the young into doing it which is heartbreaking to watch, knowing that they have made such a huge error and potentially created the condtions for premature death, birth defects, immune system disorders, heart conditions etc. And for what. For nothing. Because they believed in a bunch of liars who hijacked their better nature for the most criminal agenda ever.

Waffle
4 years ago

UK Doctor (General Practitioner) Sam White, resigned from his practice because he could not reconcile his hippocratic oath to “do not harm” with the Covid treatment measures of the NHS including use of experimental, untested ‘vaccines’.

After he left his practice and posted his pandemic views on social media he was censured by the General Medical Council and served a legal order not to make further posts on any aspect of Covid.

He has now won an Appeal Case in the UK High Court and had all restrictions on him lifted immediately.

https://odysee.com/@shortXXvids:e/telegram-cloud-document-4-5859195875556854725:6

MikeAustin
4 years ago

Note that sometimes in Yellow Card reporting, the numbers of adverse events (including fatalities) will be lower than the previous week. The Yellow Card system is a passive reporting system, so in theory this should not happen as all reports should be cumulative. However, the MHRA say they analyse the data prior to publication, with deaths and pregnancy conditions being notably investigated. They do not state criteria by which reports would be removed and to date have not clarified why this data varies. It is therefore unclear how many reported adverse events have been removed from the reports since reporting began in February 2021.

Not so.I have been monitoring this, paying particular attention to the effect that Dr Tess Lawrie’s report had. On 9th June, she urged MHRA to stop the jab programme and investigate the extreme number of adverse reactions. It is quite clear what actions they took – an 8-fold increase in removal of accumulated death totals!
Please note that spontaneous abortions (miscarriages) were sometimes removed and sometimes added back. This was done three or four times (what were they playing at?). Eventually, they were all removed. This chart only shows removals.

YellowCardReports-deaths-removed.jpg
John001
John001
4 years ago
Reply to  MikeAustin

Have you reported this malpractice to UK Column? They might decide to cover it.

MikeAustin
4 years ago
Reply to  John001

Yes, a few months ago. I didn’t get a reply.
This chart may be deceptive because the removal of miscarriages adds occasional jumps and I did not undo this when they were added back in again.
The point is that, after Tess’s report, the MHRA engaged in a flurry of data manipulation rather than tackle the real issue.
Anyway, the figures are below. You can see the vagaries under Pregnancy Conditions. Taking such a large number off in one week severely distorts monitoring. I exclude miscarriages as deaths now. As far as the jabbee is concerned, they are adverse events but not deaths.

YellowCardReports-deaths-removed-table.jpg
kate
kate
4 years ago
Reply to  MikeAustin

Wow!!!

I thought they were not recording the AE’s as they rose sharply initially and then levelled off, despite increased injections.

kate
kate
4 years ago
Reply to  kate

The risk/benefit of Covid vaccines is arguably most accurately measured by an all-cause mortality rate comparison of vaccinated against unvaccinated, since it not only avoids most confounders relating to case definition but also fulfils the WHO/CDC definition of “vaccine effectiveness” for mortality. We examine the latest UK ONS vaccine mortality surveillance report which provides the necessary information to monitor this crucial comparison over time. At first glance the ONS data suggest that, in each of the older age groups, all-cause mortality is lower in the vaccinated than the unvaccinated. Despite this apparent evidence to support vaccine effectiveness-at least for the older age groups-on closer inspection of this data, this conclusion is cast into doubt because of a range of fundamental inconsistencies and anomalies in the data. Whatever the explanations for the observed data, it is clear that it is both unreliable and misleading. While socio-demographical and behavioural differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated have been proposed as possible explanations, there is no evidence to support any of these. By Occam’s razor we believe the most likely explanations are systemic miscategorisation of deaths between the different categories of unvaccinated and vaccinated; delayed or non-reporting of vaccinations; systemic underestimation of the proportion of… Read more »

kate
kate
4 years ago

https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/comirnaty https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/rmp-summary/comirnaty-epar-risk-management-plan_en.pdf Look at the EMA authorisation document for Pfizer assessing risk. (pages 84 onwards) It clearly states unknown risks pregnancy autoimmune disease and vaccine enhanced disease. There is no safety data yet on any of these risks, and yet these injections are being given to the whole population. SVII.3.1.2. Important Potential Risk: Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease (VAED), including Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Respiratory Disease (VAERD) Table 41. Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease (VAED), including Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Respiratory Disease (VAERD) Potential mechanisms, evidence source and strength of evidence This potential risk is theoretical because it has not been described in association with the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine or it has not been reported from any other late phase clinical trial of other human vaccine. Animal models of SARS-CoV-2 infection have not shown evidence of VAED after immunisation, whereas cellular immunopathology has been demonstrated after viral challenge in some animal models administered SARS-CoV-1 (murine, ferret and non-human primate models) or MERS-CoV (mice model) vaccines. 57,65 This potential risk has been included based on these animal data with these related betacoronaviruses. Historically, disease enhancement in vaccinated children following infection with natural virus has been observed with an inactivated respiratory syncytial virus vaccine.66 Potential mechanisms of enhanced disease may… Read more »

kate
kate
4 years ago
Reply to  kate

If you read this authorisation document you realise that TPTB cannot mandate this injection as the risks of ADE and toxicity are clearly stated in the EUA.
They do know how dangerous this injection is and that the risk is unknown.
If they mandated it they would be legally liable.
It has to remain voluntary, taken at the public’s own risk, under an EUA.

Somewhere else in this document they state they only have two months safety data, so the risks of vaccine associated enhanced disease could not have been adequately assessed in the animal models – so they could not find it. Nevertheless they have mentioned the risk to cover themselves legally.

kate
kate
4 years ago
Reply to  kate

Because of the dodgy legal situation (inadequate risk assessment, use under EUA only, known risk of VAED/ADE not assessed, only 2 months safety data) I do not believe TTB will attempt to mandate this drug.

The threats are threats only. They would be mad to expose themselves to the legal repercussions of a mandate, even with corrupt judges.

I also do not see how fines can be legally justified in this situation.

Arfur Mo
Arfur Mo
4 years ago
Reply to  kate

I have a vague memory that the Pfizer (and probably all others) drug administration instruction make it explicitly clear that participation should be voluntary and participants should be allowed to make a decision based on their personal risk assessment.

Presumably if injections become mandatory, then the injecter can be held personally liable from failing to follow the medical protocol relating to the drugs. If the injecters don’t follow the prescribed procedure now, are they personally liable?

There is also the UN convention on human rights and several medical ethics statements that cover all of this.

kate
kate
4 years ago
Reply to  Arfur Mo

WHAT IF I DECIDE NOT TO GET COMIRNATY (COVID-19 VACCINE, mRNA) OR THE PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE?
Under the EUA, it is your choice to receive or not receive the vaccine. Should you decide not to receive it, it will not change your standard medical care.

VACCINE INFORMATION FACT SHEET FOR RECIPIENTS AND CAREGIVERS ABOUT COMIRNATY (COVID-19 VACCINE, mRNA)
AND THE PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE TO PREVENT CORONAVIRUS DISEASE 2019 (COVID-19) FOR USE IN INDIVIDUALS 12 YEARS OF AGE AND OLDER

Revised: 19 November 2021

kate
kate
4 years ago
Reply to  kate

The data to support safety in pregnancy are insufficient. Therefore, BNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy. However, use in women of childbearing potential can be supported provided healthcare professionals are advised to rule out known or suspected pregnancy prior to vaccination. As a precautionary measure, women of childbearing potential are advised to avoid becoming pregnant until at least 2 months after vaccination

No data are available on use with concomitant vaccines, including influenza vaccines. According to the protocol for Study c4591001, administration of vaccine or placebo was not permitted within 14 days before or after influenza vaccines, or within 28 days before or after other non-study vaccines

4 June 2021

Public Assessment Report
Authorisation for Temporary Supply
MHRA

Arfur Mo
Arfur Mo
4 years ago

I have an idea that could simplify administration of manditory vaxxines.

Tattoo people’s NHS number on their forearm as a permanent identifier. I’m sure the Nudge Unit would approve of that efficiency improvement.

LonePatriot
LonePatriot
4 years ago

Our healthcare system is about to experience a tsunami! Potential side effects of jabs include chronic inflammation, because the vaccine continuously stimulates the immune system to produce antibodies. Other concerns include the possible integration of plasmid DNA into the body’s host genome, resulting in mutations, problems with DNA replication, triggering of autoimmune responses, and activation of cancer-causing genes. Alternative COVID cures EXIST. Ivermectin is one of them. While Ivermectin is very effective curing COVID symptoms, it has also been shown to eliminate certain cancers. Do not get the poison jab. Get your Ivermectin today while you still can! https://ivmpharmacy.com

res dubitans
res dubitans
4 years ago

I’m otherwise healthy but had stabbing heart pains, of a kind that I had never experienced before, for a period of about two weeks after the second dose of the Pfizer jab.

I did not know what it was at the time, but it seems clear now, judging from other people’s similar experiences. I haven’t been to a doctor, because I’ve pretty much lost faith in the medical profession as far as anything Covid-related is concerned.

Does anyone know if there any reputable institution that is currently collecting statistics on negative reactions to the vaccine?