Novak Djokovic Continues to Support Freedom of Choice and Hide His Vaccination Status
The Australian Open is due to be held in January next year, but the state of Victoria, where the tournament will take place, has declared that unvaccinated players won’t be allowed to compete. However, world number one player Novak Djokovic risks losing the chance to defend the title by refusing to disclose his vaccination status, continuing to publicly support freedom of choice over vaccine passports. The Independent has more.
World number one Novak Djokovic has reiterated his stand about freedom of choice over taking the Covid vaccine as suspense grows over his participation at the Australian Open in January.
Djokovic has repeatedly declined to disclose his vaccination status and said last month that he was unsure if he would defend his title at Melbourne Park, “things being as they are”. Government officials of the state of Victoria, where the major takes place in Melbourne, have said unvaccinated players will be barred from the tournament.
Tennis maverick Nick Kyrgios said on his podcast this week that he was “double-vaxxed” but did not think it was right to force anyone, let alone athletes, to get vaccinated. Responding to the comments from Kyrgios, who has criticised Djokovic on numerous occasions in the past for various reasons, the Serbian said: “that was unexpected knowing what was coming from him towards me in the last couple of years.
“But this time I must agree with him that the freedom of choice is essential for everyone, whether it’s me or somebody else,” the 34 year-old told reporters in Turin, where he is competing at the season-ending ATP Finals.
“Doesn’t really matter whether it’s vaccination or anything else in life. You should have the freedom to choose, to decide what you want to do. In this particular case, what you want to put in your body.”
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Good bloke.
And it’s important to draw the distinction between the lie that the “unvaccinated” will be verboten, and the truth that those who don’t actively prove full “vaccination” will be unpersoned.
It’s the act of disclosing your personal, private medical status to every snivelling apparatchik and Day-Glo Derek that demands it that puts us on our knees. “None of your damn business” is the correct answer for a free human being.
I wonder if the merely double-“vaccinated” players have considered that by January, they may be relegated to filthy spreaders of disease, and be ordered to take a third dose.
His body, his choice.
Has anyone tried the ‘exempt’ ploy?
Questioning why your Disability makes you exempt from wearing a mask has been proven In Court to be illegal with £6k fines dished out to offenders.
Might be worth a try the same about being exempt from being vaxxed if only by fans attempting to access a venue as a one off.
Have any gone to court yet? Most offenders are desperate to settle if they think that a litigant has a case and might embarrass them in front of a judge.
Settlements are usually without prejudice, confidential and you have to sign a NDA.
There was at least one example earlier this year but I don’t recall the details.
Major store security staff were very well briefed from the outset, even better than the police, so there were few actual instances.
I took it upon myself to advise the owner of my local independent convenience store/post office on the first day of mask mandate. I had downloaded the legal summary provided by the lawnotfiction website and forwarded it to his phone.
I had no problems there at all despite hostile glances and mumbles from the mums who use that shop when taking their children home from the nearby school. Partly because I was then doing the shopping for my elderly neighbour and our combined daily spend was often over £50.00 which dwarfed what the mums spent on lottery tickets and lollipops.
Self exemption works, in England, unless you are a care home worker; although, I suspect, a legal challenge to rule that CHWs can self exempt, as well, will be forthcoming. Thank God for Wellington and Nelson.
Works for vaccine exemption?
Genuine question as i’m not sure. I recall reading that ends in April but could well be wrong.
Only for Health care workers, and I am not sure the legislation necessary to mandate that has come before Parliament yet. For everyone else, in a domestic setting, self exemption is legally binding and anyone who questions it is breaking the law. Wales has a LFT exemption to it’s vaccine passports as, I believe, do Scotland and NI. In England it is illegal to deny anyone anything if they claim they are exempt from being vaccinated. Apart from working in a care home but that issue has, unsurprisingly, Gond rather quiet…
Thank you for that clarification.
Very little legislation has been put before Parliament apart from nodding through the Covid law every six months which is why the CPS has yet to prosecute a single lockdown case.
Any Ministerial announcements stemming from that is, as I’m sure you know, secondary legislation which is automatically annulled by Primary Disability Discrimination laws put directly before MPs in years past.
Self vax exemption for non health workers has received remarkably little attention in the press although one might have thought that determined anti vaxxers would be aware.
Employers might already be quietly accepting self exemption since how would vaxxed up colleagues know one way or another?
A while back I came across an example of an out of court settlement: https://disabilityrights.org.uk/first-face-mask-discrimination-case-nets-7-000 Could have been more. I think any attempt at abolishing “exemption” would need changes to a number of Acts of Parliament – at least Human Rights Act 1998, and the Equalities Act 2010; could be more. They would all have to get through the Lords etc. Don’t forget that there will be a Xmas shutdown as usual, as well. What they have done is to keep quiet about it all, and pretend that exemption does not exist. However, they usually admit that it does in well hidden appendixes so that few people read them. Classic dodgy politics – being selective with the facts.
The problem with claiming exemption is that it still validates and complies with the system.
I’ve yet to be challenged on lack of muzzle or vaxxport (muzzle laws remain in place in Scotchland and are likely to be extended, God knows to what), but I intend for my response be along the lines of “State the statutory basis for demanding to know my private medical information.” and then less polite from there.
Of course it is far from perfect and should not be necessary, but we live in the real world and keeping a job and a roof over your family’s head is more important, to my wife and I, than principles.
How far does it have to go before principles come in?
Would you have taken the same stance in Germany in 1939?
I mean, nearly everyone did.
So was every German guilty of collusion except those who personally took a pot shot at Hitler?
I really like that.
Initially you are only likely to be challenged by Dayglo Daryl (to steal someone else’s saying) who will have no idea what you mean and neither will his available line managers.
This is the central point. If you choose to get it ( I’ll add with actually informed consent ), then fine. Nobody should be forced to disclose their medical status.
Most athletes do have to undergo testing and that has become an issue over recent years, where lot’s of their personal info has been made available through the media. Still doesn’t make it okay.
Agree, but strictly for medical reasons. If you choose to get it to enjoy the cultural, societal & economic benefits that come with it then that is a different matter – this is path to a permanent apartheid UK.
This “you might not be able to travel” line is is exactly the BS coercion method my GP’s surgery tried to convince me with earlier this year, before I called them out, and nothing to do with proven medical benefits. We are sleepwalking into an apartheid state, and there will be no easy way out.
Unfortunately there is an easy way out, if not for your conscience, take the jab.
But if being ‘fully vaxxed’ comes to include the booster your second class status might well remain in place for some months after you make that dread decision.
It all reminds me of those people (some friends included) I have encountered who chose to bow to peer pressure and started taking ‘soft’ drugs, which they claimed they could kick any time – you know the rest. Certainly the key elements of ‘neutralisation & drift’ are already in place, fuelled by the MSM, SAGE and NHS propaganda. The fact the government has effectively become their ‘pusher man’ doesn’t change a thing, as its Big Pharma pals become in turn the money making suppliers to fuel this mass coerced addiction.
By 2024 frequent boosters will no longer be free but the natural immune systems of the jabbed will be so trashed by then they will have little choice but to pay up.
The literary world and Hollywood have warned us several times about government imposed mass drug addiction/dependency.
We used to criticize the Soviets for doing just that but they seem to have confined the practice to their enemies in psychiatric hospitals, not the public at large.
The frequently jabbed will be doing what they are intended to do, dying if not already dead.
That’s only to ensure fair competition in the prohibition of performance-enhancing drugs. There’s a big difference here: The urine sample they require from athletes in top competitions are to prove there are NO drugs in your system. A vaccine requirement for a participation in a public event are to prove that you DO have a specific substance in your body, which has nothing to do with athletic performance.
I’m sure Novak has had no problem with the former in the past!
If private information about athletes performance enhancing drug tests have been made available to the media that does not make it legal or right, unless that information was leaked by the athletes themselves.
All that the public might be entitled to know is that an individual has ‘failed’ such a test and perhaps not even that if they retire graciously upon receiving the negative result.
Unless you work for a Covid vaccine maker/pusher at a very high level, then informed consent is not remotely possible. Those taking the gene therapy roulette shots are being the chance of dying quickly or in a year or so down the road, either way they are dead. Great game.
Fully Vaccinated
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WId58S99Ic8
Just one more jab should do the trick.
**** join the friendly resistance ****
Sunday 21st November 1pm to 2pm – Bracknell
Yellow Boards – Stand by the Road
A322 Downshire Way, Bracknell RG12 7AA , Near Twin Bridges Roundabout
***
Tuesday 23rd November 2pm to 3pm Bracknell
Yellow Boards By the Road
A329 London Rd, Bracknell RG12 2UJ Near Running Horse/Lily Hill Park
***
Saturday 27th November 11am – Bracknell
Stand by the Road Yellow Board MEGA event
By the Peel Centre Skimped Hill Ln, Bracknell RG12 1EN
****
Saturday 11th December 2pm – Henley-on-Thames,
HENLEY, OXFORDSHIRE STAND FOR FREEDOM
Meet by the Town Hall, Market Place, Henley-on-Thames, Oxfordshire, RG9 2AQ by 2pm
Stand in the Park Sundays from 10am – make friends & keep sane
Wokingham – Howard Palmer Gardens Wokingham RG40 2HD
Where Sturges Rd/Denton Rd meet next to Cockpit Path car park
Bracknell South Hill Park, Rear Lawn, Bracknell RG12 7PA
(Also Wednesdays from 2pm – in terrace/café if cold)
Reading – River Promenade Reading RG4 8BX
Join our Telegram Group and have some fun http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell
Day Glo Derek.😂😂😂
Djokovic sees the terrible future of mankind should the tyrannical dogs behind the push for Smartphone Movement Licences get their way. Lots of us do. We also know that if they are imposed and our 800 year-old freedoms are revoked, we will go to war with the machine and we will win, just as we did in 1939.
He is a Serb. Serbia was stitched up a treat by Clinton’s kangaroo court aka ICTY following the dismemberment of Yugoslavia.
Here is a classic Serb song from the time. Djokovic is metaphorically the guy playing the accordian, scanning the horizon for enemy action while he is playing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujQBKpjYqfE
Karadic is currently jailed in the UK – that beacon of human rights currently torturing Assange (as per UN Rapporteur on Torture). Assange had the temerity to expose the machinations of Clinton, including moving arms from Libya to support al Qaeda /ISIS in Syria. It’s a small world.
Well said. Couldn’t agree more.
I hope he doesn’t crumble. A man of his stature and achievement is a big asset on our side.
Djokovic is an intelligent man and will have done his research. He won’t be having the gene therapy poisons pumped into his body. Djoko is an example to us all and to the other sports dolts, who have foolishly taken the needle. All players should refuse to participate until this nonsense is reversed.
He is a prime example of someone who takes meticulous care of his health as it is the basis of his livelihood, vaxtards take note!
Djokovic is one of the very few pro athletes that knows exactly what’s at stake with this RESET globalist war upon individual sovereignty, bodily autonomy and a right to medical privacy.
We need more high profile figures just like him to push-back against this conformative control society narrative.
He’s also likely fully aware of the reams of athletes dropping like flies from sudden onset heart attacks….
Good on him.
https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/surge-of-sports-people-worldwide-suffering-unexpected-ill-health
Take note to the number of articles (practically every one of them) that withhold the cause of death. They’ll tell you the death was sudden and unexpected in one sentence then spend the rest of the article with a biography of the person and statements made by family and friends.
I have come to the view that if they don’t tell us the reason for the sudden death, you should assume it’s ‘vaccine’ related. It’s their job to prove otherwise.
What’s censored from the news tells you more than the narrative article ever did.
PONA (people of no appearance) generally means non-british.
In a nutshell! It is now my default understanding of the crop of ‘sudden’, ‘unexplained’ deaths – assume the vaxx did it unless the Covid-compliant, Vaxx-orthodox media prove otherwise by showing that some other cause was determinative.
I’ve noticed that there are a lot more deaths being reported of past sports stars (prominent Australian Test cricketers from Ye Olde Days, for example). There are always a few, of course, but they are quite rare. Nevertheless, the frequency seems to be increasing a tad. All anecdotal, of course, and it could just be that vaxx recalcitrants like myself are becoming more sensitised to notice them, and they are all old geezers …… but there seem to be more of them than usual.
If there any journalists still doing what they should be doing in the MSM, perhaps they could investigate.
Good on him. We need more like him. I am hopeful other athletes join him in 2022 when the realise they have to keep having boosters to remain in their profession.
And he is not wrong if this https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/fda-asks-federal-judge-to-grant-it?justPublished=true is true.
We won’t be shown the basis on which these poisonous jabs were approved for use until November 2076 – 55 years! By which time all the bastards responsible will be dead and gone.
Perhaps, if that is their plan – to avoid responsibility by dying before we find out what they did to our children – then it’s time to oblige them.
does anyone use Moderna or AZ anymore or is everyone on Pfizer? The Pfizer one being the one where more people died on the vaccine arm than the placebo arm of the trial?
I think Moderna is being offered as the booster to the folk who had Pfizer originally. That’s what the spat that our esteemed (haha) Health Secretary had with someone on Twitter was all about.
A friend i saw today said she had just had her booster and they were going to give her Moderna but having heard that she’s had two bouts (?) of Bells Palsy in recent years decided it might be better to give her Pfizer. WTF? Why on earth she is having it at all given that is one of the well-publicised side effects god only knows.
Also heard this morning about quite a well known property company owner who died in the summer – the article i read about it just said he had a stroke and died suddenly having been working on the Thursday just before being taken to hospital. Another friend i saw today who knew him quite well said he had a massive brain haemorrhage. Hmmmm, i wonder why?
Report in local Live Online
“Inside Covid hotspot where locals want face masks to be mandatory again”.
Includes interviews with local shopkeepers and shoppers who all agree that masks should be mandatory again.
One (anonymous) says “you can’t trust the vaccine because some haven’t had it so that means we’re not safe”.
Busker Sid who has had long Covid, and doesn’t want to get it again, agrees.
The article is accompanied by some boring Covid statistics and two streetscapes in which nobody is wearing a mask, including Busker Sid, that’s him, centre right.
“you can’t trust the vaccine because some haven’t had it so that means we’re not safe”.
Oh God make it stop, please.
Where do you even start????
buzz word, ‘safe’
If everyone is told repeatedly that face-masks are effective then it should come as no surprise that if you ask people about face-masks they’ll think they are effective.
The science is very clear on the lack of effectiveness of the face-masks. The propaganda doesn’t care about this, despite follow the science.
The science may be clear, but you’d think that reality, what people can see with their own eyes, is even clearer. Since we’ve had face rags there has been zero difference. Just as you’d think that people would draw the conclusion that if infections and hospitalisations in Europe, some countries of which are amongst the most highly-vaxxed in the world, are much higher than they were a year ago, with 100% unvaxxed, this means that a) at best the vaxx does nothing, b) at worst it has made things worse (my money is on option b). For your “worst cold ever” stats – I popped into a small shop where I know the owner quite well, hadn’t been there since the summer. She was jabbed over the summer and was suffering from a dreadful cold that she could not shake (10 days and counting). We were the only ones in the shop and both put her masks on as I entered. I did so because I don’t want her getting fined or having other customers whine at her. As we were the only ones, I said she didn’t have to wear the mask for my sake. That’s when she said… Read more »
So why is nobody in either pic actually wearing a mask if they really believe it makes them safe?
there was an interesting point raised yesterday (cant remember where)
a large part of unvaxxed are people living on the edge of society, homeless, otherwise lost by the system – these people are more likely to die of anything which will skew the statistics into making vaccines look better than they are
Was this the article? Vaccine Efficacy Statistics as Information Hazard – by eugyppius – eugyppius: a plague chronicle (substack.com)
It would be really interesting to hear what people like Prince Charlie think, when they have spouted on forever about only allowing organic stuff into their temple, plenty more who talk about ‘clean’ living, whether they really do agree having this jabbed into them.
Saline is better than the vaccine according to the Pfizer trial data 😆
Can you imagine the amount of pressure he is under from his corporate sponsors? Shows the character of the man.
Pat Cash’s mother almost died after tbe vaccination.
Her doctors refused to report it.
https://rumble.com/vpb84g-tennis-pro-pat-cash-talks-about-his-mothers-two-strokes-and-heart-attack-fr.html …
“Croatia’s President, Zoran Milanovic, has been wildly off-message in recent weeks with his increasingly outrageous pronouncements about Covid restrictions and vaccinations. So it was perhaps only a matter of time before he triggered an international incident.
The moment arrived on Tuesday, following an audience with Pope Francis in the Vatican. Reporters were perhaps hoping the head of a very Catholic state might contradict the pontiff’s view that vaccination is an “act of love”. But Milanovic instead obliged them with a blistering attack on near-neighbour Austria’s lockdown of non-vaccinated citizens.
“That is fascism,” he said, calling the lockdown a method “reminiscent of the 1930s”.
Vienna took a dim view. Croatia’s ambassador to Austria was summoned – and told in no uncertain terms that “the comparison between the measures against the Covid-19 pandemic and fascism is unacceptable”.
Milanovic is also at odds with the government of Prime Minister Andrej Plenkovic, which is planning to penalise officials who refuse to enforce a Covid pass system at workplaces. The president says he “will not harass” his staff to produce a vaccination or test certificate.”
lol! good man
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-59329996
The Brownstone article clearly vindicated his comparison. A must read.
Hope he’s got good security staff.
Good for them.
However, it’s vital more of us oiks do the same, just say no to the medical Nazis.
Withdraw your support, custom, money, subscriptions from any business or organisation that demands control over your body.
Write to their CEO, get your family and mates to do likewise.
Direct democracy – local action – national impact.
I have already refused to by anymore German cheese or Austrian mackerel – lol
and DATA, don’t let them share it and profit from experimenting on you in any way
I’ve just been looking at the government’s exemption from jabs page. One of the exemptions now given is allergy to any of the ingredients contained in the vaccine. I listened to Anna de Buisseret being interviewed the other day, where she said that on the vaccine boxes it stated that recipients should be tested for allergies to any of the ingredients. She also suggested that people should be tested for allergies arising from various combinations of the ingredients.
I’ve rung 119 and asked them to send me a form to fill in, to claim an exemption from the jabs. I will be asking for exemption as I don’t know if I’m allergic to the ingredients as I haven’t been tested for allergies. I intend to play the family medical history card too. I thought claiming an exemption from testing for Covid was a step too far, although I’ve never had a test up to yet.
Oh and an update on the jabbed v unjabbed- 2020 2 people known to me “tested” positive, 2021 I now know personally 11 fully jabbed people who have “tested” positive.
And so you fell straight into the trap. It is an inalienable right to make informed consent to medical treatment, and thus a personal choice that need not be justified. The moment one crumbles to this latest psy-op, one effectively dismisses this key right enshrined by Nuremberg code.
There are zillions of good reasons to not take this killer experimental jab, period, and I have no intention of proving I might be allergic to a particular ingredient. Such cowardice amounts to nothing more than asking “pretty please” to the Big Pharma Big State tyranny to be officially exempt, while still sanctioning the apartheid vaxx polices being put in place.
Unless you have somehow failed to notice, we are a state of civil war.
I have no intention of taking the jabs, BJF. I am merely testing the waters to see how easy it would be to get an exemption. I should have made that clear. I see exemptions from both masks and jabs as the government’s get out clause. Any adverse effects and it will turn round and say “Ah but you didn’t have to have the jab or you didn’t have to wear a mask, you could have exempted yourself”
Next week I am meeting with my MP and believe me, I will be championing the cause of the unjabbed as hard as I can. This whole shambolic episode disgusts me which you may have noticed if you’d read any of my previous posts.
I think the point BJF was making was that asking for an exemption is a form of going along with the mandate – we should not need to ask for an exemption, it should be sufficient to just say we don’t want to be jabbed and it’s none of anyone’s business why we choose that.
You are still playing the government game, and allowing them to blur a clear ethical issue by changing it into a medical issue. This is a slippery slope. The key ethical cornerstones of ‘informed choice’ and ‘first do no harm’ should be unchanging constants, because regardless of the individual ingredients these vaxxes have NOT been properly tested.
Lack of allergy to the individual ingredients does not guarantee safety against adverse reactions to the final processed cocktail of ingredients – as tens of thousands have found out to their cost when taking this still experimental treatment. And, let’s say the offending ingredient was removed, then you would surely be obliged to take the jab?
As for MPs, they are all cowardly CON-LAB-LIB coalition government collaborators, so I regard them as part of the enemy in this Civil War. Any MP worth their salt would have resigned long ago and fought a by-election on an independent ticket.
And there I thought that I was playing them at their own game! The allergy bit and the family history bit are irrelevant as far as I am concerned. It was merely a ploy to see how easy it would be to declare exemption, just as it was for the mask mandate.
I thought that pointing out this exemption might be helpful to people on here who are threatened with loss of livelihood as Wendy has said. I’m not in that position, but feel deeply sorry for those in that situation who have no choice alongside those who were conned into having the jab in order to be able to travel.
Yes, if it’s your livelihood it’s a hard choice and exemption is in my view a reasonable compromise
It’s a de facto war, so old normal rules do not apply. Nobody was ‘conned into having the jab to travel’, as in most cases travel simply meant holidays. Who would risk their life and long term health for a sun tan? If more people has said NO from the off, as Prof Ferguson himself admitted, the scam would have crumbled within weeks (or airline after airline would have bit the dust among other things). The irony is, now these people are long term vaxx addicts the same government will still prevent them travelling for other reasons (not enough jabs or green carbon credits or whatever), so little sympathy there. Those whose jobs are threatened, and this includes many of us, have to stop feeling sorry for ourselves and instead think it out carefully, as our unions are not backing us up. However, as I have said before on here, surely market economics will dictate that tens of thousands of unemployed unjabbed health and care workers (for example) will be a huge asset to an Alternative Health Service for the millions of us unjabbed patients who have paid into the NHS but are effectively now excluded from treatments at present.… Read more »
My friends rushed to have the jabs because they thought it would eventually enable them to visit their daughter in the USA. They had the AZ jab which I believe still has not been approved by the FDA but is acceptable to Biden because the WHO says it’s OK. So not everyone was conned into having it for the sake of a suntan!
I clearly said ‘in most cases travel simply meant holidays’. In this case you talking about the Hitchens excuse.
No matter how uncomfortable the reality or difficult the circumstances, taking a jab is an act of submission to the State and Big Pharma drug pushers unless one is 100% convinced it is for sound medical reasons. To take it for any other reason (no matter how good or worthy this seems) is an act of folly at best and self delusion at worst.
Besides, there are far more critical existential battles ahead, and if people are going to be taken in so easily by government propaganda and coercion then it’s probably best get it over with quickly. A strong family should understand a principled stance, and not demand other members risk their health just to travel to see them. And if one of the parents die of the vaxx (as at least 1 in 24,000 vaxxees already have) or suffer serious side effects, then what?
Actually we don’t know all the ingredients yet, do we?
I think the MPs who voted against the renewal of the legislation in March 2021 are a fair indication of which ones value individual freedom more than their own career and bank balance. To sum up: roughly the Labour left, the Tory right, Lib.Dems and Green.
There seem to be 3-4 legal barriers to mandating the jab at the moment. IMO the regime is playing the same psychological games it’s played since March 2020 and is doing whatever the psychologists have told it to do.
(N.B. I won’t dignify it with the word ‘government’.)
Just say “I am exempt” (whether you say more might depend on their question). You could make a relevant QR code if you use those gadgets. The “get out” clause, which is hidden to some extent, is there to defend themselves against being done for offences they are well aware of. For the time being, they need to comply with the relevant Acts – such as the Human Rights Act 1998, & the Equalities Act 2010; could be more.
I agree with you Finlayson.
From what I have found out about the “exemptions” you face a hidden assessment (in effect a secret, closed, court where you have no idea on what grounds you can justify yourself.)
The government are not disclosing the medical grounds for assessment of claims for exemption. This is clearly illegal, as any judgement of medical need should be transparent and the grounds clearly laid out to the applicant and the assessor.
This is so that the legality and justice of the judgement can be seen by both parties.
There is also no appeal against a mistaken judgement.
Since when was this legal?
None of this should stand up in court and my instinct is not to involve myself in such malfeasance.
It will be many years, if ever, before we claw back the once inalienable rights and basic civil liberties that have been ripped away by emergency legislation since March 2020. Too many people, educated people at that in many cases, failing to think and question hard wtf is going on – let alone stand up to it!
Agree 100%.
Correct.
I am not having an injection but if anybody asks it’s none of their business.
Hi Margaret, I am sure I am allergy to PEG and another of the ingredients. I won’t ask for allergy testing because I don’t want the vaccine any way and I don’t want to participate in vaccine passes in any guise. My stand on this though doesn’t impact my life so I can do this, perhaps you and others might need to seek any exemption possible to keep your job.
Thanks Wendy, please see my post below.
Isn’t at least one of the ingredients’ details withheld, as it’s supposedly proprietary? How can anyone know if they are allergic to whatever that substance is?
Sounds a lot like Pelosi’s explanation of the Affordable Health Care Act – “We have to pass the bill so you can find out what’s in it”.
You have to take the vaxx to find out if you’ll suffer life-threatening anaphylactic shock.
Spot on; however, in the pre EUA minute trial, the manufacturers did not test a cohort with known allergies as far as I can discover – only “healthy” people – in the sae way they did not test pregnant women. They now have and the effect on the numbers of women who had spontaneous miscarriages ( i.e medically within the first 20 weeks of confinement, used by midwives and Obstetricians for decades and not simply adopted for these miniscule trials ) has been horrific. This is detailed in a report by two very brave Kiwi doctors – available on The Expose.
If you want a < 30 minute round up by Dr Peter McCullough of the circumstances behind the lethality of mRNA jab delivery system, as well as the spike protein please view here:
Covid Jab Is Far More Dangerous Than Advertised
You should not need to ask for it; just declare it. Filling out a form effectively lets them in. They won’t admit that, of course. Nothing wrong with keeping private evidence on the back burner, of course, but no-one should take the risk of asking why you declared it.
“MPs voted in favour of a new set of measures, which would include access to public transport and the workplace only for people who have been vaccinated or tested.”
Germans and Austrians eh? What a surprise
Mein Gott shocking ya? Do they not know impfung macht frei?
Considering in Austria the unclean are “allowed” out to work, they are quite literally proving that “arbeit macht frei”.
A sad day when a poor taste joke becomes reality.
a very good point
I hope England avoids the Vaxpass. But then up until 23rd March 2020 I hoped we’d avoid the lockdown.
We already have the Vaxpass for care home workers, NHS workers coming next year, anyone who wants to go on holiday abroad, and countless private businesses, venues etc who are enforcing or pretending to enforce it
true – I shouldn’t ignore those categories just because they don’t affect me
I too hope that the vaxpass won’t be extended because England will represent some form of control group that proves you don’t need to extend them. Scant consolation.
Hasn’t Italy already proved you don’t need them? They have been applying it more strictly than anyone up to now and have just joined the ranks of high risk infection countries.
The covid loonies would argue it would have been worse without the passes
Look at ‘Jabraltar’.
He’s playing them at their own psychology games by not stating if he’s had the death shot because they don’t know how to categorise him. Yet, that’s the whole point – non-disclosure. Nobody is entitled to know your private medical information.
Palpatine Dan is chin deep in shit right now. The Public Health bill aka the Danfuhrer Act has stalled in the Upper House – halleluia! – and then there’s the IBAC hearings which are a whole other world of pain.
https://ibac.vic.gov.au/investigating-corruption/IBAC-examinations/operation-watts
I wouldn’t put it past him to create a special category for Djokovic and let him in just to gain a few brownie points with the populace.
Good man. If other top players succumb to this coercion, I envisage a decline in their health and form – I can then see Djokovic dominating for the next 2 seasons.
Yes it is very good there is someone of his status making a stand. He is a strong person and I support him.
yes, I imagine him being banned from all tennis for a couple of years. can’t have the unjabbed bloke making a clean sweep
He might get banned although he is pretty powerful. I don’t think they are worried about him winning, just don’t want a big name making tennis look “off message”.
Djokovic has always been my least favourite of the ‘big three’ when it comes to his style of tennis, however, on this fundamental issue of bodily autonomy, he stands head and shoulders above his contemporaries.
Agree on both counts. He has balls. Same goes for Kyrgios – I don’t much like his style, but he has balls.
I won a competition to go Wimbledon and Centre Court back in the 90s. Novak was just starting out then. I thought at the time he’d go far. Well, he certainly has in my estimations. Good man.
Our Australian reader Phil (?) described Novaks personality in a way that reminded me of stroppy John McEnroe but that, as he acknowledged, makes no difference to his right to privacy.
Yes, ’twas I, except that ‘temperamental’, ‘immature’, ‘volatile’ and ‘disrespectful’ applied to Nick Kyrgios, not Novak, but Novak is not exactly a ‘gentleman player’ like Roger Federer. Still, Novak is doing the right thing, the ethical thing. And so is Kyrgios. And Pat Cash, for that matter, in challenging the Covid/Vaxx authoritariansim. Kudos to them all.
Who thought that it would be millionaire tennis players helping to lead the charge and inspiring lesser mortals to do likewise.
As a strictly amateur (very amateur) tennis player back in the day for Adelaide University’s bottom grade, who frequently suffered from delusions of adequacy, I have some new tennis heroes, now.
Phil
Adelaide
Thanks for the clarification Phil, I never was much of a tennis fan but yes, congratulations to them all.
I have a tribe of cousins in and around Elizabeth who sadly I’ve lost touch with. I met each if them and some of some of the juniors as they did the solo trip to the home country years ago. I’d hate to think that they have fallen in line with the nonsense.
The headline should be
Novak Djokovic Continues to Support Freedom of Choice and not disclose His Vaccination Status
The word hide has implications that he is doing something wrong. Would we say someone who didn’t disclose their disability was hiding their disability?
Very good point!
look at figure 1 in this new ONS report. Chance of testing positive for triple jabbed is very very similar to those with previous covid. Both around 20% chance compared to unvax+never infected.
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/conditionsanddiseases/bulletins/coronaviruscovid19infectionsurveycharacteristicsofpeopletestingpositiveforcovid19uk/17november2021
previous infection will be far lower than that because this category includes people who never got over the initial infection. they find it hard to remove those people and sometimes use ‘had to have 3 negatives and wait a month’ or similar but I don’t think they have here. other data shows genuine reinfection to be miniscule
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/conditionsanddiseases/articles/coronaviruscovid19infectionsurveytechnicalarticleanalysisofreinfectionsofcovid19/june2021
So a typical argument in favour of vaccine passports goes something like this:
“You’re worried about adverse side effects? Well, just look at the info leaflet in a pack of Ibuprofen, for instance, and you’ll see that the list of side effects from the regular taking of anti-inflammatory easily matches that of the Covid vaccinations.”
Right, so therefore Ibuprofen is made available to be taken at the user’s discretion and the doctor’s advice. Put simply, you absolutely cannot make something in any way mandatory or a requirement for living a normal life, if it has the risk of causing death or severe harm no matter how unlikely that is.
So if vaccine-related deaths amount to something like one in a million (don’t know the real figure, but for argument’s sake), then sure, they should be made available to anyone who considers the benefits to be greater than the risks to themselves. But would it be ethical to enforce a million people to play a game of Russian Roulette using a gun with one bullet and a million chambers?
At least 1 in 24,000, as this figure is subject to under-reporting so could be several times higher. Also recent VAERS data has shown that the the under 18s are more susceptible to adverse vaxx reactions than adults. Put another way, when you vaxx a million people 40 will die, as sure as lining them up against a wall and shooting them – and that does not include other side effects or the long term impact of becoming a spike protein factory.
Couldn’t stand him before, but he’s gone right up in my estimations now.
The Covid elephants in the room
‘8 inconvenient truths for COVID-crazed medical demagogues’
https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/these-8-covid-elephants-are-squeezing-consensus-out-of-the-room/
‘Medical experts make a strong case in recent books for COVID vaccine skepticism’
https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/experts-make-a-strong-case-for-covid-vaccine-skepticism-in-new-books/
I wonder when the Germans and Austrians are going to open camps for the unvacced?
Can’t be long given their history.
Mind you, looking at the increase in gas prices, maybe they’ve started already?
Germanic people are nice in normal times but seem to be very efficient and obedient Order Followers. At the end of the day the tyrants give the orders but it is the Order Followers who are ultimately guilty for the genocide as they personally do the killing. Did the likes of Stalin and Ho Chi Minh ever kill personally?
You can guarantee one thing, when the camps open it will all be ‘mistake’ and ‘conspiracy’ to many on this site.
According to my nephew who is living in Dusseldorf at the moment, they are not at all efficient and the bureaucracy is horrendous. It took him a couple of months to get broadband installed in his apartment and he had to give up trying to register his car so he could use it over there as they wanted so much paperwork, going right back to its manufacture pretty much which of course he didn’t have. But they are very obedient order followers in his view, like you say.
Need some legal advice. I was just refused treatment by a dentist because I refused to wear a mask when walking between the reception and the treatment room. I said I was exempt – they asked me for proof and then refused to see me when I refused to show them proof, informing them that they are by law not allowed to ask me for this. Was I correct? Do I have any recourse? Can anyone recommend a lawyer? I’m not going to drag their name through the mud yet. Holding that in reserve.
My dentist made no objection to my not wearing a mask, either in waiting room or while walking to treatment room, just accepted when I said I didn’t wear a mask. Sorry you had such a problem and hope someone can advise you – are you in England as I imagine the rules are a bit different in Scotland and Wales?
I was maskless at the dentist in Scotland a few weeks ago. No one said a word. I’ve hardly ever been challenged for not wearing one. I think most folk would rather not wear one, but when you’ve accepted the whole narrative about how deadly other people are, it’s difficult to take a definite step that goes against the flow.
This page explains all the details about the mask / exemption business.
https://laworfiction.com/2020/07/face-covering-litigation-threats-and-administrative-headache/
The provide a toolkit for how to proceed when your rights have been infringed. Both employee and employer are liable.
https://laworfiction.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Face-Covering-Exemption-Notice-with-Law-Explained-24-July-2020.pdf
Some guy faced similar acts by an airline, and made claims of damages totally £100,000. The airline settled for £12,000 and supposedly upated their procedures.
https://www.thedailybell.com/all-articles/news-analysis/uk-man-paid-12000-by-airline-which-forced-him-to-wear-a-mask/
Dentists are overpaid parasites, much like a great part of the ‘health’ industry. Take them for a full drill down.