Boris Says he Can’t Rule Out Xmas Lockdown
Boris Johnson today admitted that a Christmas lockdown was not completely off the cards and made a desperate plea for Britons to get their booster jabs. MailOnline has more.
The PM – who appeared to be suffering from a cold – warned “storm clouds” of infection were gathering over Europe and forcing nations back into restrictions, which highlighted how the UK “cannot afford to be complacent”.
He said people should get a booster if they want to “avoid restrictions on daily lives”, adding that it would be an “utter tragedy” if double-vaccinated people died from Covid because they didn’t get one.
Mr Johnson also admitted people might need proof of a booster jab to be considered “fully vaccinated” in the future, in a move which could cause fresh chaos for Britons’ travel plans.
The warnings came as Britain recorded another 39,705 daily coronavirus infections, which were up nearly a quarter on last Monday’s figure. But deaths and hospital admissions – both lagging indicators – fell week-on-week.
There were 47 Covid victims registered today, down 18% on last week, and latest hospital data shows there were 976 admissions on November 9, down 7.5%.
The PM issued his warning at a Downing Street press conference, where he also confirmed that people in their forties will be offered a booster jab and older teenagers will get second doses.
Asked if a lockdown would be necessary if cases continue to rise, the PM said “clearly we cannot rule anything out” but insisted he didn’t “see anything in the data that says we have to go now”.
The comments came after Austria announced a draconian new lockdown on the unvaccinated, after a dramatic increase in infections, and the Netherlands imposed a curfew on pubs and restaurants to deal with rising cases.
Germany, France and Italy have also been seeing a significant uptick in their outbreaks. The PM was joined today by his chief scientists Chris Whitty and Patrick Vallance at the Government’s first Covid briefing of the month.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
a tragedy if double-vaxxed should die from the disease they’ve been inoculated against?
🤡world.
This isn’t particularly funny. The people who desparately want a pandemic have been playing this Just a few more jabs needed, and then … game since December last year, IOW, this is another pretty transparent attempt at creating an endless pandemic simulation by claiming that it’s imperative to combat a pandemic with means which demonstrably don’t work.
It is hard not to have a “serves ’em right” mentality – given the insults they dish out from a morally superior point of view.
.
That’s an understandable sentiment. OTOH, one of my all time favorite quotes (usually attributed to Otto v. Bismarck) is Vox populi, vox Rindvieh, a cacography of the Latin Vox populi, vox dei which roughly means the collective wisdom of a mass of people on any particular topic isn’t signficantly different from the collective wisdom of a herd of cattle: Ask them for their opinions on any topic and the result will be a loud mooing.
I don’t maintain that this doesn’t apply to me on most topics as well 🙂 and in any case, that’s a property of people one needs to take into account. Chastizing them for it may be entertaining but ultimatively, useless. Technically, the vaccinated are victims who were cajoled into agreeing to an injection whose only guaranteed property is that it will cause an amount of harm its inventors consider, well, harmless, in exchange for idle promises: It won’t stop you from getting sick, it won’t prevent others from getting infected and it won’t stop us (ie, the people responsible for this farce) from trucking on as if nothing had happened.
Problems caused by bad leadership can’t be solved by getting mad at the misled.
But that is just playing into the hands of Johnson and his crew, he wants segregation, he wants us to turn against one another, because that way through division he can control. The trick is not to see each other as the enemy, we need to hold together and face the real enemy.
Agreed
Additionally the power brokers depend on a divide and conquer approach amongst the citizens. Vaxed vs Unvaxed antagonism is a gift to the NWO wannabe dictators.
you are 100 percent correct, we must stand together and resist
imperative to combat the pandemic which never existed in the first place
With The Great Bozo as the ringmaster.
The Daily
MailNudgeSomeone who died with the presence of the virus is a Covid victim now apparently.
In NZ if you are gunned down on the street you are a victim of covid
https://youtu.be/HI2joNg5HTw
We had similar in this country last year – wasn’t there at least one case of someone who had recovered from mild Covid being listed as a ‘Covid death’ when they died in a car crash a while later?
That’s nothing The severed big toe of an Australian shark attack victim, tested positive for covid & was classed a covid death, and he hadn’t even died!
Beware the Covvishark,
Ten times deadlier than the Snark.
The rest of you may get away
But your Covvitoe will stay
Paralysed and numb
In the Covvisharky’s tum.
But what about the toe, did it survive?
Whilst I feel sorry for the guy that was killed you do have to laugh at the insanity of his death being labelled covid.
Yes – the usual definition of a “death with Covid” is someone who has died after testing positive for SARSCoV2, regardless of whether that virus ever caused them any difficulties whatsoever, and regardless of whether they ever had an illness that might be classified as Covid, which is a type of pneumonia.
That’s why the government and experts keep going on about “the data”. It’s like when a tradesman keeps assuring you he’s not lying to you.
So if you died with presence of vaccine. Ditto?
Coincidentalideath.
…or, “Coincideath“. We should coin that.
That has been the case from day 1. No one can tell you exactly how many died FROM covid. You can bet it’s really small proportion of the total they keep talking about.
Now there’s a good figure. A manageable sample of 47 to be subject to full post-mortem analysis and description.
What might be revealed?
And after people in their fourties were offered a third round of the same old jab and teenagers got their second doses, so-called vulnerable people who still didn’t have the decency of removing themselves from the group of possible virus carriers by dying will be offered their fourth same-old jab, teenagers will get third doses and the booster circus will generally start over. All voluntary, of course, just under the constant threat of restrictions if not enough people come forward to get injected just once again.
A vaccine which doesn’t really work is a perfect, eternal money-making machine for the people who sell it.
Didn’t someone recently write that the clown with the mop on the head somehow turned into a political leader comparable, at least somewhat, to the gouvernor of Florida? Still convinced of that?
Was going to write something similar but you beat me to it. When are the fanatical jabbees going to realise they will NEVER be fully “vaxxed”! That is the point of all this! Miss one and you’re right down the bottom of the snake, and will be regarded as unvaxxed as all the fully unvaxxed! You’ok never comply your way out of this!
Margaret Thatcher appears to Boris Johnson in a dream…
“Privatise the NHS and paint the Houses of Parliament green!” she says to Johnson
Johnson looks confused; “Why green?”
Thatcher smiles, “I knew you wouldn’t object to the first part”
Revelation 13:16-17.
Ah yes! The mark of the beast…
Called it. “No more lockdowns!” right up until “We cannot rule out lockdowns.” which will turn into “We need lockdowns.” They’re trying to pretend like this wasn’t the plan from the start.
And predicted it wouldn’t happen until after COP26.
I don’t understand. The vaccines were miraculous. They broke the link between infections and hospitalisations and death. I’m stunned, what happened? How? Double vaccinated might die? How could it be?
It’s going to be a real spectacle watching people who have been going on about these miraculous vaccines go into logical contortions to deal with the cognitive dissonance this produces.
The Austrians have shown us one way – blame the unjabbed. I wonder if that will catch on here too soon.
Doublethink makes its appearance here – if you question a vaxxer they will often concede the point that the vaxxes don’t appear to be doing what they are claimed to do – but then go on to insist that everyone who is “offered” a “booster” must have to to “keep people safe”…
They’ve been building up the pressure on, and opprobrium towards, us unvaccinated for months.
Cognitive dissonance will win the day. Our brains are good at it.
Nah, they won’t be doing any logical contortions because for them this is not a logical argument. We are trying to reach a rational conclusion about what the best choice is and what the data indicates. For them, this is an emotional conclusion. For them, this isn’t about infection rates, or how many vaccinated people are in hospital with covid. For them, this is about not killing grandma, about not killing people, about saving lives, about some friend of theirs that died, about someone close to them that was in hospital. You can cite all the numbers you want, they do not care about numbers. All they know is that this thing is dangerous and it could kill us all. When you will try to prove that wrong, they will revert back to saving people’s lives.
I have seen it. There is no logic to them that you can challenge. The people coming at this with logic, reason, and knowledge are all already on our side.
Ask them simple questions. Demonstrate to them how little they know.
What happened? They didn’t test the vaccines. That’s what happened. We (but not I) are one big experiment.
and then the locking down will be blamed on the unjabbed – wonder do the 2xjabbed realise they will fall into that category until they get boosted?
Liked this comment : What a dilemma the government faces. Trying to convince the unvaccinated that the vaccines work and to get jabbed and at the same time trying to convince the double vaccinated that they need to get the booster because their previous two jabs don’t work.
To me, the only rationale politicians have for spouting such patently absurd and contradictory crap as this is to play for time.
Of course to do anything else would correctly be seen as admission of abject knee jerk incompetence on an industrial scale but also I sense some desperation at the realisation of the implications of a statistically significant (and somehow still healthy) unspiked population Vs a spiked and relatively less healthy majority.
This potentially raises the game from guilty of career threatening overreaction/incompetence to outright evil alongside the worst in history.
“Those whom the gods wish to destroy they first make mad”.
One aspect of the holocaust that I think isn’t considered enough is that the Nazi’s didn’t adopt the Final Solution because everything was going according to plan, but rather because they were struggling to deal with the mess they had created for themselves.
Governments are now about to face a real challenge. Everything that they have done has been a complete failure – lockdowns, social distancing, masks, vaccines, vax passports – and they are increasingly spinning out of control. This is the moment when things can start getting very ugly, as the Austrians have just begun to show.
It’s also notable that what remains of the restrictions / guidance are widely ignored – I’ve been on trains today and despite the passive-aggressive annoucements and signs it’s clear that muzzle wearing is well down from even a couple of weeks ago, both on the trains and in the stations. I walked through a shopping centre in a large city, and despite notices saying that muzzles are still required in there the reality was that hardly anyone was wearing one, and there was no attempt at any enforcement.
Unfortunately that could all change, of course – if the governemnt says that everyone must wear muzzles to protect the NHS and save Christmas the sheep will comply!
Someone needs to ask Jesus about that saving Christmas thing…
Christmas is not a Christian festival. He wasn’t born then.
U toooo smart!
Not a Christian festival? Why’s it called Christ Mass, then?
?? The “final solution” was the mass murder of Jews, especially after military setbacks in the Ukraine, for which Jews were blamed. I’m not sure, but the phrase “final solution” may also have been used for the mass murder of other ethnic groups such as Romany people. But that wasn’t the first time the Nazis carried out mass murder. The “holocaust”, if one can use that phrase for Nazi mass murder all told, did NOT begin with the Jews (although Jews had been deprived of citizenship, arrested, chased out, fired from employment, beaten up, etc.). The holocaust began with the PHYSICALLY AND MENTALLY DISABLED, carried out for “racial hygiene”, or if you like, “long-term public health” reasons. “Racial hygiene” means “cleansing the race”. A specific phrase the Nazis used was “euthanasia”, meaning a “good death”. Medics were crucial to this policy. If you can find a single medic who objected to the policy, please post his name in reply to this message. It is crucial to know all of this in order to apply the “first they came for the…” line when it should be applied, which is as early as possible. As I have said before, many residents of… Read more »
I suppose what is worth bearing in mind is that they didn’t start with mass murder. They worked up to it, driven largely by the escalating pressure of the consequences of their mad ideas.
It frightens me that the measures they have been forcing on us for the last 18 months have stemmed from mad ideas such as
(a) we can control the spread of the virus that has made its way around the world by locking people up in their homes and making them cover their faces with cloth masks.
(b) we can claim that the virus is biggest threat in a century to our health while we publish statistics that show it is no more dangerous than a flu for most people..
(c) we can produce a vaccine based on a completely new technology in six months and roll it out to the entire world without any negative consequences.
(d) we can make normal daily life conditional on being jabbed on the premise that it makes other safe while at the same acknowledge that our jabs don’t stop infection or transmission.
Such forceful actions based on insane ideas don’t bode well for the future.
The nazis ramped up the slaughter of Jews, and others, more and more as the war turned against them even to the extent of diverting scarce resources away from the front line in favour of prosecuting the Holocaust.
Some have said that the ‘final solution’ was a result of the war, others that the war was conducted in order to wipe out Europes Jews so as they saw defeat looming the nazis wanted to murder as many Jews as possible before themselves being overwhelmed.
Star is correct in noting that the Nazis killed opponents, other ethnicities and performed euthanasia well before the Holocaust officially started in earnest, with the massacre of the Jews in Ukraine in 1941 being the first industrialized operation in that regard of which mankind became then so shocked.
The Wannsee conference took place in January 1942. And only then/half a year later did Jews abroad learn and understand what’s going on (see Hannah Arendt interview with Guenter Gaus).
The language of it is disguising the real intention and by then already made decision, emigration was no longer really an option.
We will never know what Hitler&co really thought, whether the Holocaust was their real intention from the start, whether they would have let them live and work for them in the East, if the war had gone more successfully, or whether they seriously would have been satisfied with sending all Jews to Madagascar, if they had had more time or won the wars.
They certainly advertised only the latter and even the ever more anti-semitic brainwashed or convinced German population would not have supported that mass scale annihilation before the war started to turn bad for it.
https://m.bpb.de/politik/hintergrund-aktuell/240926/wannseekonferenz
> cover their faces with cloth masks.
They’re not even masks, they’re sold and described as face coverings. The reason is solely to keep the anxious terrified of this new Health Hobgoblin.
These aren’t ideas.
They are deliberate lies, known to them from the start.
And lest we forget, every provision of the ECHR granting us “rights” has an exception for “public health”.
Yes. What we have seen is the massive distortion of that proviso that was meant only for dealing with potential biological catastrophe.
Yes. Do Not Resuscitate notices served on the mentally ill, the severely autistic, without the consent or relatives. Plus nursing home drug deaths and ventilating the frail.
They started with the disabled.
But that’s the NHS for you.
It was with great reluctance that they gave up their Liverpool Care Pathway to death.
This perspective is important, because the real ‘holocaust denial’ has been to blank out other groups who also suffered – which raises a ‘Why?’ question.
The Jews suffered the highest absolute death toll, but it was the Romany groups that suffered the largest proportional ethnic extermination. And then, as said, there were the earlier political and ‘medical’ victims.
Then there was the death toll of Russian civilians – somewhat different in nature, but the largest single mass slaughter of the war.
I’ve never understood this selectivity of memory, beyond the fact that the horror is easier to capture.
It’s important, because it puts the predations of totalitarianism into a wider context of overlapping monstrosities that should never be forgotten, and counteracts the safety mechanism of seeing it as a one-off exclusive attack on one ethnic group that ‘wouldn’t happen here’.
‘Lest we forget’ seemed pretty fatuous at the Remembrance ceremonies. Many seem already to have forgotten the real import that led to the Nuremberg Protocols etc.
Hancock wanted to give the elderly in care homes a good death too.
And the members of SAGE continue to plot and plan more psychological abuse, safe from the gaze of the public in their Cotswolds cottages.
Might as well have three “doses” (doses?!) in one go and be done with it. Wait, no, four doses, five doses, 46 doses, daily doses, hourly shots, put me on a dose drip…
Thank you.So bloody true. Even the flu jab is only meant to be ONE jab a year. people have basically had 2-3 jabs in six months. It’s utter lunacy. It’s a shame how Johnson lost his balls so long ago. If only we had a sensible, politician who could create a path out of this madness.
ONE jab maybe, but 3 or 4 elements….
The unjabbed may be coerced, but they won’t be convinced.
And trying to pretend the Yellow Card Reporting System doesn’t exist, saying the vaccine is “safe and effective”.
and saying the booster is going to “save” the already 2xjabbed from covid death.
Where is the ASA / OFCOM when you need it??
The question that’s growing in my mind is “Does the vaccine and/or booster long-term or permanently limit, degrade or destroy our natural immunity?”. If so, we are in serious trouble.
Very Pythonesque; I can visualise Ronny Barker doing one of his tongue twisting monologues by a “Pompous Person” from the Ministry of Pisspronunciation delivering this bollox with a very straight face.
But it ain’t funny really, is it? “I know my place….”
Dear Pig Dictator
Wearing a bit thin now
Hope your ADE is better soon
Ces
LOL!
Fuck off Johnson.
Our healthcare system is about to experience a tsunami! Potential side effects of jabs include chronic inflammation, because the vaccine continuously stimulates the immune system to produce antibodies. Other concerns include the possible integration of plasmid DNA into the body’s host genome, resulting in mutations, problems with DNA replication, triggering of autoimmune responses, and activation of cancer-causing genes. Alternative COVID cures EXIST. Ivermectin is one of them. While Ivermectin is very effective curing COVID symptoms, it has also been shown to eliminate certain cancers. Do not get the poison jab. Get your Ivermectin today while you still can! https://ivmpharmacy.com
what have plasmids got to do with anything? They’re found in bacteria
Well, one can only hope.
I’ve been an IVM fan for a long time now, but that link looks dodgy. Has anybody here actually used it? The reviews are all internal . . . and extremely positive.
Sorry, I don’t feel like getting it this time. But if you take the 15th now, Prime Minister, I’ll think about it.
Has anyone done a study into the effects of having regular rna ‘vaccines’!? If we are all going to have to go 6 monthly rna covid jabs from now till the end of time (as looks likely) the constant interference with the human bodies cells bodies (been told to make a spike protein and do something they were never designed to do) could have serous long term health implications.
No. Anything beyond two doses is a real human experiment originally started in Israel which didn’t have any clinical testing. With every injection, the artifical (mRNA) or real (vector) viruses will infect and reprogram some cells which will end up being killed by the body’s immune system which will cause a certain amount of damage to it the people behind the jabology consider tolerable.
I’m in my thirties so my chances of making a full recovery from Covid are better than 99%. This is madness! Why can the majority of the population not see it!
I am in my 30’s and have had covid. It wasn’t that bad. It felt like a very heavy cold. Flu was much worse. The only odd thing about covid is that I have lost my smell and it hasn’t returned after three months. Apparently I’m considered a long covid case. I don’t consider myself that though.
I had loss of taste but it came back on the next day. Mostly, that is. Sometimes, it again goes away and comes back again. And some other weird effects, certain foods no longer having any taste.
OTOH, nobody ever claimed a new virus would be all fun. It’s just not worth turning everything upside down for it. I want to have a life before death.
“Nobody claimed a new virus would be all fun.” But it has been such fun, hasn’t it, watching the world respond? 🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪
😛
I am in my 60s and I too am certain I had covid. It wasn’t pleasant, but not as bad as other illnesses in the past. I lost sense of smell but didn’t realise until it started to return after 2 months and everywhere smelt of petrol or diesel fumes. I don’t feel afraid of this virus but I feel very afraid of the response to it. Glad we have each other here.
Taking zinc helped restore my sense of smell after a bad virus a couple of years ago.
https://www.fifthsense.org.uk/
Also these people have a smell training protocol, which was useful.
I lost my sense of smell to a virus over ten years ago and it never fully returned. For five years nothing at all and then a gradual partial return. It’s very common and not peculiar to Covid as the bulshit clinicians would like you to think. So whatever virus I had, did I get the long version of it? Sheesh. Some of these people (not on this forum) love to flog a dead horse..
because they have been brainwashed to believe that the modern day equivalent of the bubonic plague is swirling around in the open air on a pavement near them
The lipid nanoparticles are themselves toxic. This is why the gene technology was never successful, you could not give repeat doses safely. (This is without thinking of the effect of the spike protein)
And yet…now we are all taking multiple does of this stuff????
Exactly.
well – not ALL of us. About 80%
See “Kate” response below; from what I have read to date – and (yawn) I am no scientist, manufacturers have known and acknowledged for some considerable time that the delivery molecules – lipid nanoparticles – are not the greatest thing to give repeat doses thereof i.e inherently harmful – others better qualified and who have greater understanding.knowledge might explain this further please.
I think some testing has been done on animals with lethal outcomes – sorry cannot remember the link.
I don’t believe there will be a long term.
The depopulation target date is 2030 at the latest – that’s the term.
What a cunt!!@!!
Yep.
.
🤣 🤣 🤣
This time last year the daily death toll was over 450 and rising. Today it is 47 and dropping.
This time last year cases were about 18,000 a day, today there were nearly 40,000.
This time last year there were fewer than 150,000 test, today there were nearly a million.
This time last year nobody had been vaccinated, today over 46million have had two and over 10 million have had three.
I think Boris is panicking because his friends are going to be cross with him if he doesn’t manage to keep their cash rolling in from all the unnecessary interventions.
The main thing to take from this is that the current dominant variant appears to be more infectious but less dangerous than the one prevalent last year – which is all in line with what would be expected with a virus of this type.
Of course, the official narrative is that ‘it’s the vaxx what done it’.
Exactly! Well said. This fact has been very successfully ignored by the MSM.
Dr Yeadon’s mantra all along, and backed up by other scientists who happen not to be on the SAGE/Wellcome/MHRA payroll.
Rather sad that the PM makes such a pathetic statement to bamboozle halfwits.
White British taxi drivers should not assume that people with foreign sounding names are suicide bombers and should not under any circumstances lock them in the back of their taxis
Bloody racists
Oops, Toby may need to backtrack on the site’s rebranding and go back to Lockdown Sceptics.
Maybe he could get him to contribute a guest article for the Christmas Day edition, seen as Boris is such a lockdown sceptic libertarian.
Johnson, don’t insult our intelligence. We know you want another .lockdown. I’m betting 15th December to the end of January, and for those who are unjabbed or unboostered only. To encourage us all to be virtuous little pin cushions.
Oh, and I hate the NHS. It’s become a monster that we all must worship and adore, and sacrifice ourselves and our children to.
Don’t forget to add your freedom, bodily autonomy and wealth to that list too. On balance I would say that it is not a fair trade off.
‘for those who are unjabbed or unboostered only.’ And how are they going to police that?
Papers please!!!!
If Boris thinks anyone would take any notice of further lockdown orders he’s got another think coming.
I really wish you were correct but sadly I think you are wrong. The dutiful British public will willingly trot home and lock themselves up till the government decides they can be released and continue to allow themselves to be injection with whatever experimental concoction the government fancies.
Indeed – the compliance of the sheeple seems to know no bounds, unfortunately. There are almost certainly more of us awkward buggers now (and some of us have got progressively more awkward over the past 18 months), but we are still a minority.
It doesn’t have to be majority to make a difference. This time last year I felt quite alone in my thinking. Now I have a large group of like minded new friends. We’ve been protesting locally and have had masses of support from the rest of the public. Naysayers are the minority. Many think they are the only ones that see through all this, and feel isolated. That’s how insidious and evil this campaign has been, but we are finding each other now. Support and pushback is growing but you have to make it happen.Don’t ever lose heart.
Agreed….my sister, a double jabbed, has just refused both her flu jab and the booster…she has had enough like a lot of people, she’s also said if they try to lock down at Christmas she’s coming to me for dinner because she knows I’ll ignore it all anyway….she can’t be the only one.
“if it saves just one life….”
And the sheeple go baa baa baaaaaa
Have just spent a merry twenty minutes upticking the best comments and downticking the worst.
There are many more votes for the former – over 11,000 for the top one.
Straw that’s broken the camel’s back?
Something for tomorrow’s news. The Great leader of Wales showing his hypocrisy.
https://twitter.com/YrHenGwrcyn/status/1460220848623824899?t=G59g2LysVXROtiZCcnTaIQ&s=04&fbclid=IwAR0QfH8KeqUTdFcU_wueAUXShsVKyibFGugZoh-kBMuT-iR_9sW-1FSkGuE
These jabs are a bit like an IQ test, aren’t they?
If you’ve refused the honour of being jabbed with a new untested ‘vaccine’, you’re above average.
If you got one or two, you’re average
If you get a third one, you have blow average IQ
If you get a fourth one, you’re probably mentally retarded.
Or will be quite soon.
Top comment of all time !!!
I am wondering how this jab fest will be represented in the vaccine surveillance data?
Will the triple jabbed now get their own column?
Will the double jabbed be added back into the unvaccinated column?
Christmas will be happening here regardless of what the masked, jabbed, Covid ‘survivor’ Prime Minister seems to think.
Meh !
There’s always the ‘unknown’ magical column in every governmental statistics. I’m following multiple in the world and I think the ‘unknown’ has a lot of hidden agenda…
Indeed – nicely muddies up the waters between the jabbed and unjabbed doesn’t it – how’s that for a nice clean set of statistics against which you can measure both vaxx effectiveness AND safety by?
Now we will have 3 categories – A) 3xjabbed, B) 2xjabbed [but they will of course be classed now as “unjabbed” – so if they die they will be “unjabbed” deaths] and C) never ever jabbed with anything
Do you think the BBC news will produce 3 columns when they are doing the nightly
feardeath figures?No. Very much doubt it.
never mind this christmas,, try the next 7 for definate.. i’d say this is proof that they have no intentions of stopping the cull.. this tender is for 7 years
Medical Assessments: Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme [Tender Notice]
There is no minimum (or maximum) commitment to the number of assessments that will be required under the contract as the scheme is demand driven, however there are currently c500 cases (as at November 2021) that require assessment with this volume increasing per week by c20 cases.
It is estimated that in year one of the contract there will be c1500-1800 claims that will require assessment within the first year of the contract.
It is estimated that after year 1 of the contract the number of assessments will between 100-1000 assessments will be required per annum
there should be 1700 claims straight off the bat!
I don’t think it counts if you’re dead. It’s to assist people with 60% plus disablement. And unless it’s changed, it’s only £120,000.
This will not assist their defence when they are tried for crimes against humanity.
Blackmail.
Fake virus.
Fake disease.
Fake cure.
Fake leadership
Fake pandemic.
Real vaccine consequences.
Plebs must form a line for their third dose.
IQ >80: OK.
IQ >90: OK, I think.
IQ >100: OK, but is it really necessary?
IQ >110: No way, bro
IQ >120: Can British people claim asylum in other countries?
The Prime Minister went on to add that Sweden, whose cases and deaths are not rising despite having no lockdowns, school closures or mask mandates, and India, whose cases and deaths are also not rising due to the heavy use of Ivermectin, no longer exist as nations and he wants any reference of them deleted from the internet and torn from books.
Lucky India. They get to keep warm AND have Ivermectin. But then they have a Prime Minister who puts the interests of his country and citizens first.
Xmas lockdown is our collective punishment for complaining about the Tesco vaccine passport commercial.
Tesco-ho-ho.
YOU USELESS BASTARD, BORIS!
That’s made my day. What a laugh!
Please, please, please stop calling this criminal “Boris”. He is no friend of anyone on here.
A good point. The repackaging of “Alex” into Boris must have bene done by the same team of PR hucksters that told Blair to go with “Tone”. The whole first-name thing is cringeworthy anyway. They should be addressed properly, in this case “Bojo the Clown” and “The Blair Creature”
For the umpteenth time, calling him ‘Boris’ does NOT mean I see him as my friend. You should see the way I say it! As a few here get upset if we call him this perhaps we should put the name in quotes each time?
It may not MEAN he is your friend but it sure sounds like it. Calling anyone by their first name implies at least a conviviality.
Call him Kim Jong Johnson, his communism, his obesity, his terrible hair etc…