New Zealand’s Ministry of Education Tells Teachers to Phone the Police if Unvaccinated Staff Show Up to Work
From Monday, all teachers in New Zealand must have received at least the first dose of the Covid vaccine to continue working on school grounds, with unvaccinated staff committing a criminal offence if they try to enter the classroom. In addition, the Ministry of Education has recommended that schools should ring the police if any unvaccinated teacher turns up to work. The Mail Australia has the story.
The advice, published in the Ministry’s gazette on Thursday, tells school leaders that if they, or any education staff, turn up to work on Monday unvaccinated against Covid, they will be committing an offence.
The advice being given to schools follows the ‘no jab, no job ‘policy that was enacted by the New Zealand Government last month.
“The staff member will be committing an infringement offence if they have not had their first dose of the Covid vaccine and are onsite November 15th. This means they may be liable for a fine”, the advice read.
“If staff do turn up on site after this date, we encourage school leaders to deal with this in the usual manner you would if other inappropriate people were to turn up on site.
“If you feel your safety or the safety of ākonga (pupils or students) or other staff is compromised, you could consider contacting the police”.
The advice also stated that an unvaccinated person could no longer work on-site at a school without a valid medical exemption, or a written letter from a doctor outlining an exemption request has been sought.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Aussie Health Chief Says People Who Don’t Get Vaccinated Will Be “Miserable” And “Lonely” For Life
Speechless!
Dr. Chris Perry. won’t be lonely, hopefully prison guards will check on him for the rest of his existence.
We need to apply trade sanctions on communist Australia!
I was just discussing the situation in Australia having watched the Pandemic Podcast live last night on this subject. Just imagine that if Australia were the only country doing this sort of thing (I know it’s worse than here, admittedly) and it was two years ago – what would the headlines in our newspapers be? And yet, silence. And yet, some people do know a bit about what is going on and to be honest, they just shrug their shoulders and don’t care. In exactly the way they shrug their shoulders about the vaccine injuries which every person knows about, even if not the extent of it. Unless it directly affects them or their close families, today, they just don’t care. Freedom? What’s that?
It’s not the inhabitants fault, they’re the victims and our government is not going to freeze the bank accounts of their leaders, gove them medals more likely.
That applies to almost every western economic sanction in history. In this case, it’s difficult to see how you can harm Aussies any more than their own government is already.
They aren’t communists, nothing even near that, they are satanic sadists.
Getting more than a little tired of seeing the WEF portrayed as Communist, as well. They are the exact opposite of Communists, at least as described by Marx – they’re super-duper hyper-feudal capitalists, and their primary concern is the welfare of the high financial class.
Communism = the majority exploited for the benefit of a tiny minority, & enforced by corrupt camp guards.
So what’s fascism then?
Both fascism and communism were born out of socialism I believe.
I am calling this particular brand of tyranny as corporate tyranny.
Facism IMHO is evil by design, certainly the nazi version of it; Communism inevitably turns to evil through necessity since otherwise it cannot pretend to work.
Both rooted in Socialism as you say.
Corporate tyranny
Is certainly the CCP model
Communism is evil, by design too
I see where you’re going with this, don’t get bogged down with historical definitions, the rules have changed. It’s simply a world ruled by technocracy where everyone’s equal except the “elite” 1% who won’t have to follow the communist rules.
Enjoy your UBI.
There’s little difference these days. Get a piece of string – write communism on the far left, fascism on the far right – now join those two ends together and you’ll find they’re right next to each other.
Basically, the same as communism: a boot stamping on a human face. Left boot, right boot, same difference.
Precisely. The left boot was made in a Nike sweat factory, the other in a State-owned factory.
Exactly, “you’ll own nothing and be happy”, pass nothing on, have no culture, no family, no friends, no job, no hobbies, no aspirations, but we’ll own everything privately and live like bourbon aristocracy isn’t communism, it’s pure unadultered cannibalistic oligarchical tyranny.
They are the new Mongols.
globocap will be a 2 tier economic system with ubercapitalism for the elite and high financiers and communist serfdom for the servile survivors of the current depopulation drive
We all have our own definition of communism, I like yours.
I reckon there could be more unification amongst us if we just call it Tyranny. There are many flavours (feudal, fascist, communist, neo-thisnthat etc) of tyranny. Lets stay focussed on wrecking the elites party, not arguing over semantics.
They are imposing sanctions on themselves.
Ah, I see what you’ve done there – “for the rest of his existence”, based on the crucial “for life” bit he did NOT utter in the interview, but which was made up by the antivaxxers?
The problem would be finding a court that would convict and sentence him.
Just saw that piece to camera on Carl Vernon YouTube.
Smarmy twat thinks he owns the country but lockdown Xmas for the unvaxxed is spreading throughout what we used to call the free world.
I’ve emailed him – nothing rude, just a reminder that Nuremberg 2 will happen and maybe he should give it some thought.
Except that he did not really say that – certainly not the “for life” part. But you’re very welcome to keep misquoting him, after all that is how “information” on the anti-vaxx sites works.
How is this any different from what the Nazis were doing? It is well known that the obsession with cleanliness was in part responsible for fuelling hatred towards Jews, and that Jews were often portrayed as unclean. This is exactly what is happening today. 100 years ago it evolved one bit at a time from dislike, to disgust, to hatred, to 6 million Jews being brutally killed. How will this end any differently?
I don’t know that the unvaxxed will necessarily end up in camps, but we are headed on the road to exclusion from society and the inability to feed oneself, so the end result may be the same. Also, I don’t think it will end with the unvaxxed – at some point it will become clear that even excluding the unvaxxed will not stop the overburdening of the healthcare system (the supposed reason for these blatant and shameless violations of constitutions and human rights treaties). The next step is to exclude those over 80, then over 70 from admission to hospital, regardless of vaxx status, as they are the primary burden in terms of corona. Please note I am not advocating this in any way, but I believe that will come. Once you start making it acceptable to exclude one group from society, it is easier to move on to the next.
All I can say is that not one person who knows me will EVER be able to say “wir haben es nicht gewusst”. They know and they choose to participate, something I will rub in every chance I get, now and in the future.
If they take away everything I have to live for I’ll be sure to find something to focus all of my attention on as a substitute.
😉
Yes, that’s the main risk, and that is also why the exclusions will be temporary and based on the hospitalization stats – as has been done so far.
Australia already has isolation camps.
And the whole point of the “70% vaxxed for herd immunity” was to introduce legislation targeting the unvaxxed with the consent of the vaxxed majority, and to then make the vaxed unvaxxed by demanding all sorts of boosters. By the time the vaxxed realise they’ve been had, it’s too late. The legislation is already in and no way to remove it. This is what they’re doing with electric vehicles in order to limit our freedom of movement. The world is full of useful idiots.
On a lighter note
Doctor Tells The Truth | Real Climate Science
“On October 24 he got his third vaccine, and died in his sleep two weeks later.”
You just keep forgetting that the exclusions will be removed next spring when the cases go down again.
.
It will end differently because the vaxxed are now being deliberately culled and are a disappearing entity. That is why they are desperate to have no one left out of the “poison death shot” scheme.
The unvaxxed are of course the control group that they don’t want, as it is already becoming clear they are not the ones, who are now dropping like flies. Even the thickest Covidian should soon be able to work out just what is going on.
I think you are over-estimating the average intelligence, plus the fact that even many supposedly intelligent people have become completely brainwashed. It’s become a cult where people continue to ‘believe’ in the face of all the evidence.
I said should, not would, but your point is generally agreed.
Yeah, I’m not holding my breath on that one…
See above.
“sunk cost fallacy” of risking the jabs means they probably will not.
Rowan you are right. I have a friend and it is shocking to see the change in her health since she had the vaxx. They are rushing ahead to vax all age groups now, with no concern for the impact in injury and death. Surely people must wake up soon, the harm is evident. (although my friend did not think to connect her problems with the vax. It seems that a few weeks intervening between jab and injury is enough to obscure the link for most people)
If they don’t die or have a stroke within the fifteen minute post vaccine window they think it can’t bethe vaccine.
The first thing the nazis did was to remove their enemies from the workplace. Some well know German companies had anticipated this and sacked their Jews and Communists before required to do so.
Then they removed their typewriters, telephones and cars, (from the few that had them). Their means of communication.
The next ‘logical’ step would thus seem to be the removal of phones and internet access from the antis but then their brave new Social Credit Society would not work
Poor old bozo must be quite confused.
“to 6 million Jews being brutally killed”
I suspect it will end with 2 more 6’s being added this time…
The UK is actually looking like a pretty good place to be right now.
Don’t talk that one up, for pity’s sake.
It would be interesting to see what might happen here if this were to be proposed for teachers. How would the unions react? Might Starmer stop braying for more lockdowns etc., get off his backside/fence and provide some opposition?
Undoubtedly, most current unions have been captured by the establishment. They are a disgrace to their heritage, as is Starmer to his (putative) heritage.
Had the unions been unambiguous re. their members’ rights, and the consequences of flouting them, the government would be in deep doo-doo.
I’ve posted a comment from eleswhere praising the efforts of ‘The Workers Union’ in proving ‘medical exempt passes’ for members. I have no idea if they are real but their website emphasises support for NHS staff members.
Could just be the logo/colour scheme but there is something that smacks of the bnp about it but that might just be me.
I joined the Union 2 months ago purely because of the work they did for the care home staff.
Do you have any links at all in regards to these exemption passes?
Just this
Indeed, bribing and/or threatening union leaders would have been a key aim. It’s probably not all that new, as workers have been generally poorly represented for decades.
Yep I believe they have been targeting the unions to infiltrate and turn them.
That’s a pretty low bar.
Isn’t that depressing?
Well, it’s a bit less shit than some other places, but I certainly wouldn’t go as far as saying it’s ‘good’…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQAkzVADCAs
Here to put you back in a bad mood
NEW Test & Trace Scandal. £ Millions WASTED. Taxpayers BETRAYED.
Deloitte to do Audit of track and Trace “project managed” etc by,,,, Deloitte
I’ve been watching all the Anglosphere closely. England in particular comes out at the top, but of a very filthy pile.
For a few days maybe.
It will change in an instant, when the man child gets his orders from Bill.
Johnson wasn’t going to do anything whilst the COP26 Boondoggle was underway.
I reckon he’ll impose restrictions next week ie 6 weeks before Christmas to “save Christmas.”
There must be a few kiwis who didn’t hand their guns in, I wouldn’t have.
I doubt it. They (the population) seem like very civilized people, very law abiding. This is the problem with the western world. We have become so docile as a people, that we can no longer defend ourselves. Europeans in particular have had a yoke around their necks for so long they can’t even feel it. They look from their cages at Americans and laugh at how free they are.
This is nonsense stuff. Most people, shamefully and sadly, align with governments in this.
No doubt the Kiwis will be honouring the Anzacs who gave their lives to secure freedom from fascism.
My sister in law is a teacher in NZ. They are moving back to the UK in January, her and her daughter (my bro and their son staying put for time being), because of the NZ policies. It is insane. They have lived there for 14 years and were happy until this insanity started.
I hope they aren’t disappointed. The UK is hardly a bastion of liberty. I suppose it’s a measure of how extreme NZ has become.
The stain of Blairism is a curse everywhere it goes.
New Zealand is very isolated and sparsely populated. When the going gets much tougher, as it will, there will be nowhere to hide or escape to.
I think England isn’t too bad (unless you try to leave the country). However, she is going to live with her mother in WALES. She may well be disappointed.
Austria ‘days away’ from imposing lockdown for unvaccinated
What are they going to say when the control group demonstrates just how worthless the vaccines are?
Jordan Peterson hammers ‘totalitarian’ Covid rules
Personally I always felt Peterson was overrated, the fact he got vaccinated discredits him even further IMO, I put him in the Hitchens camp.
Controversial = not a regime marionette.
I’ve liked and followed Peterson for years, way before his Rules For Life stuff.
Using Bible stories to illustrate the basics of human behaviour as a psychologist was always interesting.
But of he got vaxxed in the hope that ‘they’ would leave him alone he has gone down in my esteem especially as he has fought and won plenty of battles of his own against an overbearing establishment.
Peterson has been ill (and still is, I think) so he cannot really be expected to be up to speed on everything. But he always has been mainstream in his respect for the system, and that is why I have never been impressed by his political analyses. He had very naïve political understanding, and could not see the inherent abuses in the capitalist system. He is good on psychology, and the Jungian stuff, but I don’t agree with his views on feminism (not from a woke perspective, just from the experience of being female)
However Peterson is personally brave, so he may speak out when the time comes.
Robert Malone has just had an epiphany about the corruption of the system he trusted and Peterson needs one too. I think he is waking up, but he is still suffering the effects of his medication problems.
Thanks you put that better than I could have.
At least he seems to be being honest about his motivations and coming to possibly regret them. Gotta give him that.
And how do you impose this?
Oh, I’m sure they will have thought of something – and whatever rubbish they trot out, because it will be about as ‘scientific’ as a blob of jelly, the people will believe it and parrot it to each other
They are going to say that the isolation worked.
And there are STILL so many people who won’t have a problem with this.
Who knew we lived among so many Good Germans?
In the 1930’s in Germany they imprisoned the Jews in concentration camps.
In 2020’s Europe they imprison the unjabbed in their own homes. Much cheaper. No staff required.
Saved on fuel bills too.
‘SOS from Australia’: Freedom activists plead for political asylum from COVID regime
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/australians-call-on-foreign-leaders-to-accept-covid-tyranny-refugees/
Heartbreaking video embedded in the article.
We should start a petition to the UK govt to give Australians and Kiwis asylum. Although it hasn’t got a chance in hell of getting through it could help make people in the UK aware of the situation there. I bet most Brits don’t even know.
Considering the unjabbed in the UK might soon need some kind of ‘asylum’ themselves, where do Aussie Freedom activists think might grant them the asylum they seek. Their tyranny will in one form or another be spreading over the entire world in a short space of time.
This is proper dystopian stuff.
Doesn’t say what the vaccination rate is in NZ but if it was happen to me i’d be thinking about either going off on long term sick (anxiety, stress etc) or taking a career break. It’ll be the children that suffer when there is a shortage of qualified teachers.
NHS is ‘on its knees’ even WITHOUT a Covid surge: Heart attack and stroke
I wonder what could be causing this mysterious rise in Heart attacks? Another booster anyone?
Jonathan Van-Tam says Britain’s Covid crisis will be a ‘lot calmer’ after Easter… but gloomy scientist says we should prepare for up to EIGHT more years of misery
Oh, joy another 8 years of vaccine boosters.
The target date fir the depopulation programme is 2030 so if the target is not reached before it has to be by 2030.
There’s the “up to eight more years of misery.”
I do not like to say this, but I can see that many people are now habituated to mask-wearing, so the masking, vaxxing, threat, charade can continue with much public acquiescence.
Yes. truly baffling. Massive hospital overcrowding in Western Australia too, a place with a high vaccine rate but zero covid. Where is Columbo when you need him?
I’d rather have Sherlock Holmes and Dr Watson, they are men of action.
All of the West is in crisis. It is not a stretch to say Canada and NZ simply can no longer be described as liberal democracies. Australia is on the verge, but some states are much better than others. I saw the clip of the tyrant in Queensland casually explaining to two morons on a state-controlled news show that Australians who are able to read research papers and therefore know the risk of the injections will be made miserable and isolated until they break.
This is not how you talk to people in liberal democracies. These people will pay a savage price for this abuse and disrespect.
I used to just wish people and the government would see sense. But now, I think that it is dangerous to simply move on and carry on as normal. People need to learn what the consequences of the actions of this government are. Otherwise we are setting ourselves up for a repeat exercise when the next little bug (or any crisis really) comes along.
The clock is ticking until the first overeager politician is assassinated by some anti-vaxxer. However, nobody should be looking forward to that, as it will be undoubtedly used by the totalitarian regime to ramp up and brutalize the fight against opposition, and also to rally the blind masses behind this fight.
It would not be a surprise to see a shooter gets in first when the realisation that said shooter was SARS COV2 variant infected despite being fully jabbed and boosted..sinks in….
Western Australia. Isolated from the world, isolated from the rest of Australia. Zero covid throughout the entire pandemic. 69% double-dosed with the gene therapy. And yet, Watson, and yet… massive, unprecedented hospitalisation of people.
We are not stupid, so they need to stop lying to us. We know why they’re in the hospital.
The unvaxxed to wear yellow stars?
As an unvaxxed teacher I wonder how long before this plays out in the UK. Even after everything we’ve seen our own government do, however, it still seems very hard to imagine. I am shocked by the extreme behaviour of Australia, NZ and Canada in particular.
It’ll be a hard case to make here in the UK because the ONS has kindly given a breakdown of ‘infections’ and deaths by profession, in which teachers came out no higher than the general population. So what would the argument be? How are these questions not being asked in Aus/NZ?? Isn’t there any opposition to this over there; has everyone just rolled over and taken it? What’s actually going on?
Since when did facts & logic get in the way of government covid overreach, they followed “the science” until the scientists didn’t say what they wanted them too.
There’s no reason behind any of this that makes any sense – we are just expected to obey.
I have the same fears regarding academia – I think it’s even odds whether they come for hospitality or education next after they’ve done the nurses in.
New Zealand and Oz were unfortunate that they didn’t get hit badly at the beginning.
This allowed the authorities to impose restrictions on the basis of “not allowing things to get worse”.
Once you allow somebody to control you on that premise alone there is no coming back from it, because to argue against would be to admit that you want things to get worse.
That’s a very good point; more problematic in covid saturated Britain. That’s both in terms of infection and people’s interest in it!
Yes, this is also the case in the Far East, where there are now more vaccine deaths than Covid deaths. I think we can all forget about going that way or Australia/NZ for the next five years at least, barring an insurrection.
Probably a dim question but how would they know who’s vaccinated or unvaccinated? What if a teacher refuses to say yes or no? Couldn’t the teacher use the emailed FOI reply recently on DS when someone asked for vax status of MPs?
I once declared myself medically exempt from giving evidence, as a hostile witness, in a Crown Court trial
The Court Officer had to ask for my permission to look at my relevant medical records. It suited me for him to do so and giving that permission began when my GPs Receptionist telephoned to say
“there’s a Police Officer X been on the phone . . .”
Point being your rights to medical privacy are, or were, quite robust.
They would require a vaccine passport. More to the point, this information is all held in databases. It’s only a matter of time before vaccination status appears on enhanced DBS checks for employment.
I very much doubt that the databases are accurate.
I think is possible that something is injected along with the vax to show whether you are vaxxed or not.
But in any case I shall not worry about the regimes accurate/crappy record keeping.
The only source of inaccuracy is clerical errors and corrupt (bribed) people entering false data. But both problems can be solved by technical and organizational means. It’s the same sort of question as “how will the police officer know that I don’t have a driving license / what my identity is?”
You Sir are a camp Guard.
Do NZ teachers require a vaxport to enter work? Do employers currently have the right to interrogate databases about the health of their employees?
The fact that they allow a ‘medically exempt’ teacher into the classroom proves that this is nothing to do with public health.
If their narrative was true (i.e. the presence of the unvaccinated is a danger) then any unvaccinated teacher would be a present danger, irrespective of medical exemption.
For example, if taking a naked light down a coal mine is dangerous then one would not be able to avoid the danger by making exemptions.
So, to admit the ‘medically exempt’ unvaccinated shows that they do not believe their own propaganda that the unvaccinated are dangerous.
And this fits perfectly with the NZ Prime Minister’s public statements that the aim of these policies is to coerce the unvaccinated. There is little attempt to hide that this has been their policy all along.
They’ll just say it’s “every little helps”. One candle down a coal mine is safer than two.
Same goes for the recent admission that Nusres could also claim medical exemption from vaccines, which I see as a climbdown by HMG, giving the hesitatant an easy get out clause as with exemptions from wearing masks in shops where the government knew they were on shakey grounds legally.
What is to stop staff saying vaccines cause them anxiety or distress and how could it be proved otherwise?
Note it still remains an offence against primary Disability Legislation to question the nature of someone’s disability.
Mask exemption is self-certified. Currently care workers can self-certify as medically exempt but this facility will expire in December whereupon a medical certificate will be required.
Since this is an employment issue, the employer merely needs to see evidence of the medical exemption certificate, they don’t need to know the nature of the disability. However the GP or other issuing authority will need to know and assess the disability in order to write out the exemption. In that case YOU are voluntarily providing the details in order to persuade them to grant you the certificate.
There might be cases where a vaccination procedure induces anxiety and distress, so there will be some cases where persons will be affected enough to persuade a doctor to grant an exemption. But I suspect it will need to be a phobia of needles or such like that can be medically categorized rather than an objection on religious, philosophical or conscientious grounds that results in anxiety and distress.
Quite possibly there will be a subjective element, and we will end up with some GPs dishing out large quantities of them, and others resisting issuance as much as they can.
I would be interested to know the criteria for exemption.
But they are secret. And not only do you not know them, you cannot appeal against a mistaken judgement.
This is currently illegal.
Does not induce confidence in the system.
I did note a recent hysterical Australian ‘newsreader’ shouting that doctors issuing such exemptions would have them audited. No doubt the same totalitarianism will spread to here.
Orwell called it doublethink
Good 38 min. talk by David Martin
https://www.bitchute.com/video/tRrJ3gzmvMt8/
complete with list of the Biden regime’s breaches of the US Constitution and the US government’s illegal GoF (aka bio-weapon) work since 1999.
By the sound of it, part of a larger event with other speakers.
This beggars belief. Just where are we going as a society? Back to the 1930s?
It’s time for mass human, mass global resistance.
Agreed. It wont happen any time soon though. Pigs satisfied…
Haka-SS
Hell is the Antipodes.
I had planned a long holiday in NZ when I retired ….. not any more. It would be like having a holiday in a Concentration Camp. Same applies to Australia.
Our healthcare system is about to experience a tsunami! Potential side effects of jabs include chronic inflammation, because the vaccine continuously stimulates the immune system to produce antibodies. Other concerns include the possible integration of plasmid DNA into the body’s host genome, resulting in mutations, problems with DNA replication, triggering of autoimmune responses, and activation of cancer-causing genes. Alternative COVID cures EXIST. Ivermectin is one of them. While Ivermectin is very effective curing COVID symptoms, it has also been shown to eliminate certain cancers. Do not get the poison jab. Get your Ivermectin today while you still can! https://ivmpharmacy.com
Irrespective of whether or not there exists any medical scientific evidence supporting this policy (and there doesn’t appear to be any), human rights cannot be alienated, and the perpetrators and principal collaborators of this policy should expect to be tried for Crimes Against Humanity.
this crazed criminal psychopath gives Crazy Horse (Lakota war leader of the Oglala Sioux, 1840-1877) a bad name.
Language is important…
The offence is an “infringement offence”- what is that? Not a legal one? Is it just breaking an advisory rule?
”MAY be liable for a fine” not WILL
”COULD consider contacting the police” not HAVE TO.
Is this in actuality perhaps just another bullying tactic that wouldn’t stand up in court if it got there?
Do human rights acts (and other legislation) not trump these apparent “advisories”?
The school playground bully used to use similar tactics as I recall – and the answer was to stand up to them, hard!