News Round-Up
- “School Covid absences rise two-thirds in fortnight” – A snapshot survey shows 2.5% of pupils were out of school for Covid-related reasons on Thursday.
- “Clot risk linked to AstraZeneca vaccine could depend on which blood group you are” – Researchers have identified a genetic link that could make people more predisposed to CVT, a rare type of stroke that is most common in young women, reports the Telegraph.
- “Vaccine passports and travel restrictions will kill major events, as this year’s l’Arc de Triomphe flop shows” – Just 15,000 people attended the running of Europe’s richest horse race in Paris, 27,000 fewer than in 2019. It’s all the proof needed that if vaccine passports and travel restrictions are the new normal, big events are doomed, writes Neil Clark in Russia Today.
- “Should you need a Covid vaccination certificate to attend church?” – “It may be a risk too far for some, and theologically unpalatable for others, but There is neither clean nor unclean, for ye are all one in Christ Jesus,” writes ‘Archbishop Cranmer’.
- “Scotland’s shambolic vaccine passport roll-out dented public trust, admits Nicola Sturgeon” – The First Minister has apologised for the “extreme frustration” caused by the botched launch of the £600,000 app.
- “Jacinda Ardern has come crashing back to Earth” – With little acquired immunity and low vaccination rates, New Zealand finds itself vulnerable to an explosive epidemic, writes Ross Clark in the Telegraph.
- “How Britain was corrupted” – The Pandora Papers reveal that Westminster is covering for crooks, writes Ian Birrell in UnHerd.
- “How Raab plans to fix the law” – “How do you solve a problem like Britain’s creaking criminal justice system? To the newly appointed Secretary of State, the answer involves ripping up the Human Rights Act, rolling out more electronic tags for convicts and pumping cash into preventative projects,” writes Gus Carter in the Spectator.
- “Forcing staff to attend ‘menopause awareness’ courses will be an albatross around women’s necks” – Such a heavy-handed approach only perpetuates the ‘stigma’ that, at various points of their lives, we are incapable of doing our jobs, writes Celia Walden in the Telegraph.
- “Insulate Britain leader has six diesel vehicles on farm” – People living near Roger Hallam’s organic farm in Carmarthenshire, west Wales, have accused him of double standards after it was revealed that he had parked six diesel vehicles on his property, reports MailOnline.
- “Fanatical eco-cult are only fuelling contempt ” – “We are dealing with a fanatical eco-cult every bit as bonkers as any of the lunatics who have, over the centuries, sought to impose their will on the rest of the world,” writes Sarah Vine in the Mail. “And potentially just as dangerous.”
- “Hydrogen boiler revolution ‘pretty much impossible’, says minister” – Lord Martin Callanan, a Junior Minister in the Business and Energy Department, has admitted that low-carbon hydrogen is unlikely to become a viable alternative, reports the Telegraph.
- “Michelangelo’s David canceled? Replica of iconic nude statue has its genitals covered up at Dubai Expo – reports” – A giant 3D-printed copy of Michelangelo’s famous statue of David displayed at the Expo 2020 in Dubai has been caught up in a censorship controversy, after organisers obscured its genitalia to adhere to strict public nudity laws.
- “Museums deconstructed by degrees” – “If the head of a national museum is a left-wing politician – appointed under a supposedly right-wing Government – then you know progressive poisoning affects both institutions and political parties,” writes Alexander Adams in Bournbrook Magazine.
- “BBC may not exist in a decade, says Nadine Dorries as she hits out at ‘Left-wing bias’” – The Culture Secretary tells Chopper’s Telegraph podcast that the corporation has to change, accusing it of failing on impartiality and “access”.
- “Democracy dies when freedom of speech is restricted” – From the LGB Alliance to the Sun, why is censorship the left’s answer to everything, asks Brendan O’Neill in Spiked.
- “‘There’s no way that something like vaccine passports helps us level up – because people will fall off the edge of society’” – Laura Dodsworth gives a message to the Conservative Party during their conference on why vaccine passports were never the answer.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Because they are zealots, and there’s nothing zealots hate more than someone pointing out the truths they have to deny in order for their zealotry to survive.
I actually read that initially as “Democracy dies when freedom of speech is restricted which is why censorship is the left’s answer to everything”
Your subconscious might be onto something….
Sorry to piss on your ideologically monochrome pansies – but this right-wing government seems to be doing pretty well on the censorship front.
… especially when they start censoring people.
“this right-wing government”
LOL!
“If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through.”
Still using the blind eye to look through the telescope, I note. I predicted this solipsistic response in attempt to deny the reality that this cuts across the political spectrum
Are there advocates of censorship on both sides? For sure,always have been and always will be. But it’s the politically correct (now termed “woke”) left that is driving censorship and suppression of dissent these days and has been for decades now.
In my youth the characteristic attitude of someone on the left was:
“I might hate what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”
Now it is:
“Your opinions are hate speech and you must be excluded so that no one can hear you say it, and punished as well, to discourage you and others from saying it again.”
Rather suspiciously, imo, this shift occurred as they grew to realise that they were no longer the ones threatened with the jackboot, but were wearing them themselves.
Once again, you are labelling what you don’t like as ‘left’, whereas the picture is far more complex.
I could do the same with the term ‘right’ (and admit that some of my correctives do so, just to strike the balance – with tongue in cheek).
But, as I’ve often pointed out – the left/right dimension as a descriptor is looking very tired and tattered now, as political debate has moved on and the libertarian/authoritarian dimension has become more salient – as good political science has noted.
But if you want to hang on to the single dimension, then, yes, the Johnson government is of the ‘right’ by any criterion.
It is clearly the case that there are numerous definitions of left/right, with many different systems that can be applied, as discussed at length by the excellent US Supreme Court Justice Scalia in a piece linked here by Julian a while back:
“Is Capitalism or Socialism More Conducive to Christian Virtue?“
I have repeatedly here explained my own usage in this regard as follows: the left are the radicals who seek to remake society in pursuance of their ideological fantasies, the right those who resist.
Left and right in this sense are probably fundamental and eternal features of human nature, but in any case they predate the C19th arguments over ownership of the means of production and C20th disputes over state versus private, and remain after those have receded into the background of politics (where they belong).
Authoritarian/liberal is another eternal range of political dispute, and it is just as salient today as it always was, and no more. It was always one that was not identical to left/right, arguably (by many) perhaps, orthogonal to it.
It’s a right-on, wrong government. That’s enough for me!
Debate: are Conservatives doomed?
Peter Hitchens, Ed West, Miriam Cates and Matthew Goodwin joined UnHerd in Manchester
Who gives a F?
As a conservative (not a Conservative – Unherd got their capitalisation wrong), I do, obviously.
Ah, so it was a typo then? I did wonder.
Definitely, Sayers explains in the intro that they broadened the issue out to conservatives rather than the “Conservative” Party alone, but I don’t think they grasped the need to change their capitalisation.
Probably depends partly if you mean “Conservatives” or conservatives. I will say this much though. It could be that it’s dangerous if voters are not given a genuine choice in elections. Just ask people who lived under the Deutsche “Demokratische” Republik.
Hitchens is someone with whom I don’t agree about everything (he’s significantly more authoritarian than I am, for instance), but on this particular topic he is perhaps the most qualified and competent observer presently active in our public life. I don’t agree with his assertion that you need to have been a Marxist-Leninist to understand politics in general, but it certainly is an ideal background to understand the triumph of the Blairite sect of radical leftism over both Corbynite leftism and conservatism. He was head and shoulders above the others in this discussion. Cates seemed very clever and will no doubt make a successful politician if she can keep her seat, and it was interesting that she admitted openly that the covid response had been basically unconservative (also interesting that Freddy Sayers carefully avoided referencing that). She and Goodwin are basically accepting the left’s victory over the past half century and making as loud a noise as they can about minor trimmings – and hugely overstating them at that. They both mistake the “Conservative” Party’s benefiting from Labour’s collapse (a result of abandoning its core constituency, the indigenous working classes), as securing the “Conservative” Party’s future. They don’t understand that… Read more »
“More authoritarian” – do you mean the cannabis business? (And whether or not prohibition works, in general I think people should bear the costs of the consequences of their actions so far as practicable).
As for the past half century, it ought to be more widely understood that many of the policies over the last 50 or 56 years have been a disaster for many of the working class (and the last 18 months is perhaps a new nadir).
If the Conservative party think that people have nowhere else to go, that strikes me as remarkably complacent after 2015, and it might be a good thing if some of us reminded them what happened, and that there is only so much voters will put up with (as we have seen in Scotland with the Labour party).
The SNP and UKIP seem to me to be examples of such breakthroughs, and it seems reasonable to assume there will be others in the future, and crises, such as the engineered one of the past 18 months can lead to political change. Whether it will be through Peter Hitchen’s destruction of the Conservative party or some other means, I don’t know.
““More authoritarian” – do you mean the cannabis business?”
A general feature I have noticed in his positions over the years. He makes quite enthusiastic (and sometimes quite strong) arguments for various authoritarian measures (drug prohibition, smoking restrictions, seatbelt laws etc) which I find much less attractive than he does.
“If the Conservative party think that people have nowhere else to go, that strikes me as remarkably complacent after 2015“
They will hope that no single issue parties will arise, and that if any do they can successfully co-opt their issue as they did with Brexit.
Make no mistake, it’s very, very hard to break into a two party fptp system.
Imo only a strong populist force exploiting a general economic and cultural malaise has much chance of doing it, absent an external crisis such as an unignorable direct military defeat.
“What is interesting is Hitchens’ visceral dislike of the only likely solution to the doom he sees – populist conservatism as represented by Trump supporters (if not necessarily by Trump himself), and I think this is to do with form as much as substance.”
I think Hitchens may be a bit of a snob. Trump and his supporters probably seem like ignorant oafs and yahoos to him. Maybe I am being unfair, but I think this reaction is probably not uncommon among conservatives and “intellectuals”. I could probably be accused of reacting like that. It’s also true that Trump had/has a lot of flaws and that supporting him because you don’t like the other side might lead you down the same wrong path as voting Conservative because you don’t like Labour. Certainly I would rather have seen a less flaky, less narcissistic, more polished conservative doing what Trump did. Someone unapologetic and hard-hitting, but harder to attack. Probably such a person would not have had the same popular appeal that Trump did. I think things are so bad in the US that voting for Trump was definitely the right option, despite his flaws.
Definitely snobbery is a big part of it for many on the right who can’t support Trump and Trumpism. Can’t say whether that s true of Hitchens or whether it’s just an understandable dislike of some of Trump’s personal characteristics. There’s no doubt Trump is not a reserved, decent, respectable, morally upright person in his personal life, of the kind that most conservatives would ideally want to be seen to be led by. But no leader of that kind is around, and probably no leader of that kind would have the financial independence and willingness to face public ordure for saying things rendered unsayable in elite society, that are necessary to surviving in politics outside the mainstream these days. Trump was the best option because he was essentially the only option. It was him or continued surrender to the US version of our Blairite establishment – the globalist left that dominated both Democrats and the RINO Republican Party I certainly felt something of the same instinctive dislike and disapproval of Trump as a person. But in office, he rather surprised me. Imo he was by far the most American President since Reagan, at least, and in that sense, as the… Read more »
“But in office, he rather surprised me” I think if people were honest, a lot of them would say the same thing. Often when people denounced him it was because of what he said, and/or the tone he used when saying it, rather than what he actually did, which in the main wasn’t all that controversial, IMO. American Presidents have much less power than people think they do. Probably the most egregious thing he did from the POV of those who were against him was to appoint three relatively conservative justices to the Supreme Court, one of which was a fairly straight replacement (Scalia), one was in place of the least conservative justice (Ginsburg) and one was for a Republican-appointed Justice (Kennedy) who latterly often voted with the “liberal” wing. This changed the balance of the court to having a majority of supposedly conservative justices, though in reality the Chief Justice (Roberts, a Bush appointee) is really a liberal who is happy to legislate from the bench. They are obsessed with the idea that they will roll back Roe v Wade or possibly the gay marriage decision, both of which had a pretty flimsy basis in law IMO. The Supreme… Read more »
This is why the betrayal of US conservatives by RINO (Blairite, basically) Senator Lindsey Graham has been so foul:
Tucker Carlson: Lindsey Graham has helped Biden reshape the federal judiciary
This is the road to secession and civil war.
“the Blairite radical left”
See what I mean – you end up with an oxymoron by trying to force this outdated descriptor on what is essentially just your own predelictions. There is no such beast. The Blair/Brown era represented a move to the right of centre, with a few (emphasis on ‘few’ policies tending more ‘leftward’). Starmer – an establishment figure – has pushed this even further, on the back of the MSM/establishment attack on Corbyn.
Clearly not “just my own predilections”. It’s general common knowledge that “political correctness”/”woke” causes come from the left and are overwhelmingly pushed by the left. The fact that they have been in large part adopted by the “Conservative” Party – after becoming socially dominant – obviously doesn’t make them suddenly “of the right”, it confirms the shift of the “Conservatives” to the left. Of course, you can easily find other people making the same points, it’s pretty much common ground in the debate I linked above, though the “Conservative” Party advocates in that debate try to obfuscate it a little in relation to their Party. As I noted above, Hitchens (due to his personal background in the Marxist Lenjnist activist movement and long career as a top level political journalist), is by far the best source on this particular aspect (Blairite radicalism), and his material has been linked and quoted for you here on numerous occasions, but you simply ignore it. The whole idea of Blairism as a “move to the centre” is an establishment fairy story to make what they want into the “moderate”, “centre ground”. It suits both the said establishment and the leftist rivals to Blairism (who… Read more »
Re. the schools absence story.
If you look at the actual report you can see that nearly the same percentage of teachers were off that day. So much for the vaccines significantly reducing the risk of disrupted education.
90% of DS1 compatriots were stabbed on Monday ( he did not go to school that day ) on Tuesday he reported
6 out of 28 absent from one class
12 out of 29 missing in another
At least 3 kids with blotchy red patches on face
One previously healthy kid reporting 140 then 200 BPM heart rate after just 60 then 90 seconds of moderate aerobic exercise in a Biology practical 😱
The teenage Eagle reported some class mates under the weather following clot shots. These are children being summonsed to their GP, rather than school jabbing (Scotland).
200 bpm???! Biology teacher should have been capable of recognising a potential problem, but it doesn’t surprise me if not, given critical thought no longer seems to be fashionable.
“Vaxports/travel restrictions will kill major events”.
If the trend indicated by ITV’s tracker continues, it could be less than 85% (of the known adult population) “fully vaccinated” by the time vaxxports start in England in December (or whenever). So more than 15% of the population unable to attend major events, plus their friends and dependents who will not go if hey are not going. Attendances are going to take a big hit. Will people really put up with this indefinitely?
“Should you need a vaxxport to attend church?”.(“Archbishop Cranmer”).
This would be less rendering unto Caesar what is Caesar’s and more taking the mark of the beast. The duty of Christian leaders is to provide the full sacramental life to all regardless of medical status etc., and following the example of Fr. Damien the leper priest among others, and going underground if necessary. I will not be showing a vaxport/social credit score card etc. to attend church any time soon, in common I think with many at our anti-lockdown church, and provision will be made for us one way or the other. It would be expedient if Christian leaders could speak out on this, emphasising that the church is for all, and that any government considering going beyond their authority and attempting to enforce vaxxports for churches is committing an abomination.
The silence of ‘Christian’ leaders on every urgent issue surrounding the Covid bollocks has been deafening. So far, Dustbin Jellybaby has shrunk from coming out fully on the side of evil and oppression, as the Bishop of Rome has, but that is only further proof that Jellybaby hasn’t even the courage of his lack of moral convictions.
“Progressive poisoning affects both institutions and political parties”.
What exactly are they progressing to anyway? If it is the continuing shambles of the past 18 months, count me out.
“No way vaxports help us to level up” (Laura Dodsworth message to Tories).
If the “Conservative” party ignore this and push ahead with a system of “vaccine” apartheid that will discriminate against many millions of people, they might just find that it is time for a politics plan B. These milllions will not just be votes on rigged opinion polls but massively angry people who will face having their lives ruined because of their tyranny and may never vote for them again.
I would much prefer it if opponents refrained from trotting out the argument that vaxports are undesirable because of their effect on this or that minority/group, as Laura did at the end there.
Such a qualification seriously weakens the arguments against by suggesting that they might not be all that bad otherwise.
She is pretty damning about them in all aspects, it was a great speech, but it was given at theTory party conference so she was mainly trying to persuade them why they shouldn’t vote for it.
I think the point is to try and shame politicians and political parties who claim to defend minorities into changing their position. And after all surely the main issue with vaxports is that they are discriminatory.
Much less news from Australia recently.
What happened to the truckers’ blockade and to the construction workers’ protests?
The state is winning the vaccine passport war. Street Fightin’ Man has now taken to the courts. There are a myriad of legal challenges underway to challenge the ‘No Jab No Job’ mandates being imposed against construction workers, FIFO (Fly-In-Fly-Out) mining workers, teachers, nurses, disability care workers, police and some private companies (such as fruit-canning outfit SPC and Qantas). Some deadlines for the jab have now been passed and former protesters have been sacked or suspended and spend their time at Centrelink to secure welfare payments. Meanwhile, fines for lockdown breaches proliferate – Western Australian police, for example, dished out 315 of them for breaching border restrictions yesterday alone. The collaborationist construction union in Victoria is purging its ranks of members who took part in the Days of Rage two weeks ago in Melbourne. ‘Pop-up vaccination clinics’ have been appearing during the footy finals round – a great move which should net them some intoxicated potential jabees whose decision-making has been impaired by alcohol. And Australians now really do have a million reasons to get vaccinated against coronavirus – the ‘Million Dollar Vax Alliance’ will give any double-jabbed Aussie the chance to win a million dollars, as well as the opportunity to win… Read more »
Thanks once again for the very interesting, ( if horrible ) update.
The West Australian government is imposing mandatory vaccination on the mining industry, which would give them an extra 100,000 rolled up sleeves. How many walk is yet to be seen.
On a lighter note – Australia’s overblown and hysterical response to The Dreaded C is summarised perfectly and succinctly in this screencap from the Guardian.
Thank you for the update Phil.
There appear to be quite significant differences in the timing (and the nature?) of the measures introduced by different states.
Do you read anything into that?
If they were looking to test the water before going all out,I would have thought that they would have started in a less populated state.
Under Australia’s federalism model of government, each of the six states (and two Territories) get to act pretty much on its own despite what the federal government might wish, especially when all responsibility for ‘public health’ under the Australian Constitution rests with the states. The political flavour of the state governments also plays a role in the patchwork policy differences between states. Generally, the Labor states are more draconian re lockdowns and vaccine discrimination (to show how militant they are about saving lives, I suppose) – so Victoria is uber authoritarian, Queensland is in and out of lockdowns at the drop of a PCR hat and WA is living its secessionist dream as it shuts its borders to filthy easterners, whilst the ‘Liberal’ states are slightly less trigger-happy (although New South Wales has given Victoria a run for its money). There is a bit of a race to be seen to be doing something more radical than the next state – Victoria exempted the construction industry from lockdown during its world-record lockdown spree, a gap which was filled by NSW which initiated construction industry lockdown, which was in turn followed by Victoria going after its industry (and union base) –… Read more »
Thank you for the fascinating information Phil.
Interesting to see the drop in support in your state in recent weeks.
I note Lord Callanan who is sceptical about hydrogen boilers for domestic heating has a degree in electrical and electronic engineering. This compares with Sajid Javid who has a degree in economics and a career in banking and appear to be furious about care home workers rejecting the mRNA covid vaccine because he seems to believe they are some of magic potion that will do all sorts of things that they do not do.
As a non scientist, who is Sajid Javid relying on for advice that compulsory vaccination for care home workers makes any sort of practical, technical or medical sense? Or is he just acting out of a position of unethical, technical ignorance.
He’s in a position that enables him to bully, intimidate, and crush the human spirit. You don’t need qualifications for that, apart from being the devil’s spawn.
That is true just look at the dictators the world has spawned in the past. Some are around now.
Re hydrogen as a fuel, perhaps we could chemically combine it with carbon and call it natural gas?
Where is the order Biden promised on Sept. 9 requiring vaccines at companies with more than 100 employees? Alex Berenson Oct 5 This article says Biden has not issued any order: https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/10/05/wheres-the-biden-executive-order-mandating-the-vaccine/ And in fact the Federal Register has no Biden executive order mandating vaccines for big companies: https://www.federalregister.gov/presidential-documents/executive-orders/joe-biden/2021 Okay, so this article from Sept. 14 suggests the Occupational Health and Safety Administration will issue its own order – a so-called “Emergency Temporary Standard.” “President Biden has the authority to direct OSHA to develop an ETS without issuing an executive order.” https://www.littler.com/publication-press/publication/president-bidens-covid-19-action-plan-what-employers-want-know Would love lawyers to weigh in on this. In place of an OSHA mandate that might not survive court review, the administration appears to be trying to use a backdoor plan by having agencies require both contractors and SUBCONTRACTORS to meet Biden’s federal employee vaccine requirement (which he HAS issued as an executive order) – I got an email about this yesterday, and it is the reason JetBlue and American have given for requiring employee vaccines. The dark brilliance of administrative state authoritarians. The email: My husband works for a large government contractor… The Department of Energy just slipped in a contract modification stating the 90% of workforce had to… Read more »
Doctor Performs Blood and Immune System Test Before and After COVID Vaccination, The Alarming Results Motivate Him to Share This Video October 4, 2021 | Sundance Dr. Nathan Thompson was approached by a long-term patient, we will call him Mr. Smith, who was being forced by his employer to get the COVID-19 vaccine. Mr. Smith and Dr. Thompson have a long history together, as the doctor helped his patient change his lifestyle and eliminate Mr Smith’s type-2 diabetes. Because Mr. Smith has a long history of blood tests to form the baseline for his healthy immune system; and because the patient was being forced to take the COVID-19 vaccination; Dr. Thompson and Mr. Smith decided to take comparison blood tests after the first shot and after the second shot to see if/ how the patient’s blood-work was impacted by the vaccine. The doctor states his, “Jaw dropped after seeing the blood test results following the second shot.” The results alarmed Doctor Thompson so much, with the patient’s permission, Thompson felt compelled to record this video and share the results. Overall, the blood-work showed a massive negative impact to the natural immune system of the patient. Because his patient is now more at risk after… Read more »
This video is now on http://www.banned.videos
Two top Pathologists reveal astonishing results of investigation into ten deaths linked to the Covid-19 Vaccines – “We’ve never seen anything like it…” By Daily Expose on September 26, 2021 On Monday September 20th, two top pathologists held a press conference in Germany to reveal their findings of an investigation into ten deaths linked to the Covid-19 vaccines, and what they revealed is shocking. The press conference took place at the Institute of Pathology in Reutinglen, Germany; of which Professor Arne Burkhardt has been in charge of for over eighteen years. Professor Burkhardt held the press conference alongside another experienced pathologist, Professor Walter Yang who has headed a private institute specialising in lung pathology for the past 35 years, among other appointments. In collaboration with several other anonymous pathologists, Professor Arne Burkhardt and Professor Walter Yang investigated ten deaths that had occurred after the person had received the Covid-19 vaccine, and this is what they found… Of the ten deaths, the two Professors confirmed that they concluded five were very likely due to the Covid-19 vaccine, two were probably related to the vaccine, one was inconclusive, and two they concluded had no relation to the Covid-19 vaccine. However, what they… Read more »
Jim Woodgett, former Director of Research at Mount Sinai Hospital (2005-2021) Answered May 5, 2021 The SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein encodes a 1273 amino acid protein. Multiple by 3 to get the number of nucleotides and add some untranslated regions for directing translational start and aiding in stability it rounds to approximately 5,000 nucleotides. 1 nucleotide of RNA has a mass of (averaged) of 320 Daltons. So an RNA comprised of 5,000 nucleotides has a mass of 1600 kiloDaltons. There are 30 micrograms of RNA in a Pfizer/BioNTech single dose (in 0.3 ml). That means there are about 11.3 x 10 to the power of 12 molecules of RNA per shot. (First shot?)11,300,000,000,000 molecules of RNA (11,300 Trillion) approximately. The Moderna shot typically uses more RNA. Erwin Claassen, Wetenschappelijk Huurling at Waar Niet Answered May 5, 2021 (2nd Shot) a shitload… dose is 100µg of mRNA (not all vaccines is mRNA), that is around 505.440.000.000.000.000.000.000 copies… more or less (505,440 Trillion Trillion) Me: Which is more mRNA particles, than the blood cells, you have in your body. So if you have a 3rd booster that might tanslate to a further 1,010,880 Trillion, Trillion, Trillion mRNA particles in your body? mRNa is… Read more »
Thanks for posting that – truly terrifying. I fear this isn’t going to end well for people who’ve taken these jabs.
It’s also worth remembering that clotting was predicted by Bhakti et. al prior to widespread jabbing. Thus his comment that he wouldn’t touch the snake oil ‘with a barge pole’.
What I find bizarre about this so-called vaccine is the thinking behind it. It presumes that the body is a mechanistic system of parts. It is instructing the body to both produce spike proteins and then for the immune system to respond in a given way. If the body is doing both then surely this comes under the banner ‘auto-immune.’ The body is effectively a ‘house divided,’ fightng itself. This is the antithesis of the holistic approach to health, where the aim is to restore balance and harmony – to resolve inner conflict whether within the psyche or the body. The reasoning behind this gene therapy strikes me as totally unintelligent and potentially dangerous.
Dr. Carrie Madej Examines “Vaccine” Vials, Horrific Findings Revealed
Oct 5
Posted by Editor, cairnsnews
The Battle For Humanity Why Vaccines Alter The Human DNA by Dr. Carrie Madej
There is a battle raging for humanity. Dr Carrie Madej reveals to Stew Peters how Big Tech collaborates with Big Pharma to introduce new technologies in the coming vaccines, that will alter our DNA and turn us into hybrids.
This will end humanity as we know it and start the process of transhumanism: HUMAN 2.0 The plans are to use vaccines to inject nanotechnology into our bodies and connect us to the Cloud and artificial intelligence.
This will enable corrupt governments and tech giants to control us, without us being aware of it. That might sound cool for those who watched too many sci-fi movies, but the reality is that it would end our autonomy and make us slaves of globalist tech companies who can then control us, without us being aware of it.
CairnsNews
something for those considering using the vaxxpass….
Paraphrased and modified for UK speak from Karl Denninger’s Market Ticker site:
UK Privacy laws protect “personal private facts” specifically that such a right exists with regards to one’s medical status but to be a private fact it must be reasonably treated as private by you.
Note that for a private fact to exist it must be private. There is an exception in the law for things that are newsworthy and of legitimate public concern but absent that medical status is one of the areas where this law is routinely upheld.
If you make known to others without a legal duty of confidentiality that you are HIV+, for example, you cannot sue if someone discloses that because it’s not private anymore.
Once you willingly make something public by your own actions it is not possible to return that item of information to the status of a private fact.
Showing your vaxxpass to anyone voids your right to any of your medical information being confidential anymore.
Very wary of anyone proposing to ‘rip up’ the UK Human Rights Act just now. It is probably in need to review/reform but we’ll need that done by someone relatively trustworthy ie no one in the present government. Right now it’s the only thing stopping the PM and cronies from going full gulag.
It was always the case that they were stirring up antagonism to the Act because it hindered their dictatorial instincts – not for any of the minor issues that they highlighted in order to wind people up.
We all get that England is just waiting to see how badly the the Scotch and Taffies mess up their implementations of the Social Credit Score apps before pressing ahead, right?
And that the Scotch mess will be leveraged to say “Look, we’ve fixed the problem, which was the inconvenience. So stop whinging about ‘freedoms’ and ‘rights’ and show your papers.”
If you show them once, to anyone, anywhere, for any reason, there’s no coming back from that serfdom.
“…because people will fall off the edge of society.”
Ooh, very scary. Off the edge of what ‘society’? You can’t fall off if you’ve already chosen to leave. I see much that’s best avoided and zilch worth staying for. It seems ‘society’ is anti-social and outside it social.
I wonder if the maskateers believe that wearing masks makes them invincible?
One believer, fully masked up (of course) walked in front of my wife’s car this morning totally oblivious to any danger.
But “hey ho, I’m wearing a mask, so I’m going to live forever, ain’t I?”
TOTAL WANKERS!!!
We have a lot of the electric scooter brigade around here. Zooming about at breakneck speed (they often overtake me on my bike) on pavements, cyclepaths and roads and I’ve never seen one of them wearing a helmet. I do regularly see them wearing masks though as they dice with death amongst the traffic. More scared by a dose of the sniffles than being squished under the wheels of a car.
I am pleased to read that some people are standing by their principles and not taking any vaccination.
The winner of the Dutch miss world contest has stepped down because to participate in the world finals she has to be vaccinated. She even goes as far as to say she may never get vaccinated.
News in Dutch. You can use a translator.