News Round-Up

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

36 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mark
4 years ago

A bit of the kind of balance that the BBC (and most of the rest of the mainstream media) long ago gave up on.

Providing this kind of stuff is the whole raison d’etre of GB News.

‘Modernity was invented in Britain’ – David Starkey hits back at Greta Thunberg

Starkey as usual very sharp. The characterisation of Thunberg as basically filling the role of a medieval child saint – stark staring mad, but taking the dominant religious elite’s dogmas to absurd extremes and therefore politically and socially unchallengeable – is absolutely spot on.

And his mischievous dig at Scots Nats (you can see he knows he’s going to wind people up from his mannerisms when he says it) is also excellent (and aimed at people who eminently deserve to be poked):

it all spreads to Scotland, but only after Union. The Great Enlightenment of Scotland is a pure product of the Union“.

Annie
4 years ago
Reply to  Mark

A distinguished historian versus a hysterical brat.
Guess which one governments will listen to.

Annie
4 years ago
Reply to  Mark

I’m sure superbrat would have loved the life of the average European woman in pre-modern times. Help tend sheep, help shear sheep, clean wool, card wool, spin wool, weave cloth, make clothes, hoe ground, spread muck, fight weeds and blight, grind corn, cook pottage in iron pot, gather firewood to cook with, well-nigh starve in winter (in Scandinavia, eat birch bark), get married at fourteen, bear ten children in undrugged agony, see all but two of them die before reaching adulthood of diseases which have no treatment before modern medicine, die of puerperal fever after your last pregnancy. Pure environmentalism, yeah.

Julian
4 years ago
Reply to  Annie

A very good point, well made. I’m fine with giving rational, non-hysterical, balanced consideration to how we can coexist with nature in the best way possible for our long term future, but I find it tiresome listening to people bleat on about how terrible we are and at the same time benefit royally from the fruits of the industrial revolution, the technology revolution, organised agriculture etc, as if you could simply switch it all off but still have life saving drugs and the internet. Puerile.

William Gruff
William Gruff
4 years ago
Reply to  Julian

The ecoloons forget that we live as we do because our ancestors did not like the way they had to live and devoted themselves to changing things for our benefit.

huxleypiggles
4 years ago
Reply to  Julian

And life-saving “vaccines.”

Trabant
4 years ago
Reply to  Annie

Lol true. My boys ( 9 and 14 ) sometimes ask “What was it like living in the middle ages Dad” and I usually reply something like that “Miserable, Short, lucky to live past 5, riddled with parasites and disease, always hungry, likely to be worked to death or murdered”.
they don’t ask anymore

Milo
Milo
4 years ago
Reply to  Annie

sounds like if things carry on the way they are at the moment – the way SHE wants them to – she will soon get to taste all of that way of living along with everyone else when we all get plunged into a mediaeval way of life

john ball
john ball
4 years ago
Reply to  Mark

unfortunately he is very pro vaccine and very abusive to those who question the narrative. This might explain his recent rehabilitation

Mark
4 years ago
Reply to  john ball

Yes, he can be intensely annoying, if you are his target or just don’t like his style.

He was quite good on the lockdown early on.

Mark
4 years ago

Oops. America thinks the unthinkable: More than half of Trump voters and 41% of Biden supporters want red and blue states to SECEDE from one another and form two new countries, shock new poll finds This is where the left’s refusal to tolerate anything but complete victory for their own ideologies and dogmas will always lead. When all political avenues of dissent are shut down, or rendered ineffective or impossible by massive elite manipulation, in the end you are left with capitulation or civil war as your only options. Wise old US commentator Victor Davis Hanson explained back in February how this worked in the specific case of the Trump insurgency in the US, talking about the way the elite globalist leftist (Blairite, in UK terms) Democratic Party abandoned their old indigenous working class constituency and instead of accepting the democratic verdict when they paid a price for that abandonment, instead chose to suppress democracy and dissent: “It’s tragic that this country is at this place right now, because it didn’t have to be this way. They could have said Donald Trump represented a lost constituency that … globalised culture had ignored in a very amoral fashion and that was… Read more »

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago
Reply to  Mark

Ah, the “Democratic” party did it too then, as well as New-Old-Whatever Labour, and Francois Hollande in France? Are there any major parties left I wonder in Western countries that support and respect the “indigenous working class”?

I know that there’s corruption in lots of elections, but how bad was it in the so-called United States in 2016? There’s a cleric at our anti-lockdown church who is furious about it. Always was a stupid idea of course to put elections in the hands of big tec…

Julian
4 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

 Are there any major parties left I wonder in Western countries that support and respect the “indigenous working class”?” Depending on your definition of “major”, I doubt it. Probably those that get closest are considered far-right e.g. AFD or Le Pen’s party. Maybe some far left ones too in the ex-Warsaw Pact countries. None in government or close to it.

Mark
4 years ago
Reply to  Julian

The far right parties are the only parties who really represent the indigenous working classes nowadays, because they are the only parties who dare to openly and genuinely oppose the primary short term threat to those classes, namely globalism and mass migration.

Of course, there are ulterior motives on the far right for seeking working class votes just as there always were on the left, so arguably you could predict the far right will abandon those people as thoroughly as the political left did, if and when they achieve the kind of complete dominance the woke left has in the late C20th/early C21st.

At the moment, though, the far right are the only alternative to the dominant elite, and they will continue to grow until moderate resistance reappears..

Mark
4 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

I know that there’s corruption in lots of elections, but how bad was it in the so-called United States in 2016? There’s a cleric at our anti-lockdown church who is furious about it. Always was a stupid idea of course to put elections in the hands of big tec…”

I think there’s always a fair bit of corruption around in US Presidential elections. I think it only becomes an issue when it clearly changes the result, which is probably relatively rare. In this sense, I doubt 2016 was anything unusual. 2020 was a huge outlier, in its blatant manipulation of the result to elect a basically otherwise unelectable slate. The US (and therefore the world) will be paying the price of that (secession being one potential ultimate outcome) for years to come.

In 2016 big tech was still pretending to be officially neutral. That was the big shift in 2020, fuelled by the hysterical Trump obsession after 2016 of the elite left who dominate big tech.

William Gruff
William Gruff
4 years ago
Reply to  Mark

The hysteria was due to the shock the chatterati felt at Trump’s win. They expected Clinton to romp home and she didn’t. Had they any doubt of her victory I have no doubt they would not have affected a position of disinterested neutrality.

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago
Reply to  Mark

Sorry, I meant 2020, not 2016! How time flies…

Mark
4 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

That makes more sense!

I’m agnostic about how much direct vote-rigging there was, but as I see it, the result was mainly rigged anyway by the massive, systematic media and big tech lying and manipulation of news and opinion.

Gregoryno6
4 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

This clip is still open for all to view on CNN’s youtube page. Funny to see how concerned they were about tampering with voting machines after Trump’s election.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HA2DWMHgLnc

Mark
4 years ago

Stars are polluting dressing rooms spouting Covid anti-vaxx theories about Bill Gates, infertility and using VITAMINS!

ROFL! The DM writes it like it’s a bad thing! People whose profession requires looking after their own health talking about vitamins! The horror!

This kind of story is excellent for reinforcing the current resistance amongst significant proportions of our younger people. Propagandists like the DM web news editors think that by spinning it as a negative story they can defuse any signal supporting resistance to their “vaccine” dogma, but the reality is that most resisters will read that and their takeaway will still be that significant numbers of the people in society they look up to, and who depend on their personal health for everything, don’t think taking the “vaccine” is wise.

Mark
4 years ago
Reply to  Mark

Oh, and I’m shocked, shocked, at the disgraceful incident of Gareth Southgate getting abused for being vaxxed!

Obviously what he should be getting abused for first and foremost is for being an insipid, barely competent, establishment arse-licking, political correctness-worshipping, anti-British woke collaborator. As well as for falling for the covid panic nonsense.

refusenick
4 years ago
Reply to  Mark

Conspicuously absent from that long-winded diatribe of an article? Inclusion of an actual quoted opinion from a single vaccine-refusing ‘star.’
pure propaganda.

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago
Reply to  refusenick

Ah, the “truth”, Mailicious style!

This is much better from the Brussels Times from 18th August (mentioned in news roundup, 4th September) and should be required reading for all those involved in sport.

https://www.brusselstimes.com/belgium/181660/doctors-advise-against-intensive-sport-after-covid-vaccination/

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago
Reply to  Mark

Sister paper of the Mail on Sunday who printed a trouble stirring incendiary piece by disgraced former minister Matt “stick at nought” Hancock demonising people who won’t take those “vaccines”? I’m not sure that I’ll buy that paper in the future.

Annie
4 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

Incendiary?It was hate speech.

William Gruff
William Gruff
4 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

You’re not sure that you’ll buy that paper in the future? The decision doesn’t seem a difficult one.

Milo
Milo
4 years ago
Reply to  Mark

Spot on – if you think of the influence that footballers have, sometimes for good, especially on young people, DM has effectively scored massive OG with this story. Way to go DM!!!

Paul B
4 years ago

This is amazing, the adverts, wow!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAmDaQSDglA

Ron D should just reupload these ads to his own account lol.

Hilarious and terrifying (that people are actually allowed to publicise such nonsense) in equal measure.

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago

“JCVI ‘failed’ to advise the government to ‘vaccinate’ 12-15 year olds against ‘Covid’ “!!! (Telegraph news article, quoted in Michael Curzon Bournbrook article). Words fail me! Another newspaper to avoid? As for said “vaccinations”, this is my understanding about them. If anyone with detailed medical knowledge would care to elaborate on this, I would be interesrted to read their views. In a four week period to September 19th, 73% of “Covid” deaths were in the “double vaxxed”. At the start of this period there were perhaps77% of the known adult population who had had two of these injections (I don’t know where to get the exact figures and did not note them at the time) and 81.7% at the end of this period. As people are not counted as “fully vaccinated” for two weeks after their second “vaccination”, I assume that the figure who would count as fully “vaccinated” at the start of this period would therefore be the number of people who had had both injections two weeks before the start of the 4 week period from 23rd August to 19th September, i.e. 9th August – perhaps about 74%? A further confounding factor is that the poor and ethnic… Read more »

JohnK
4 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

Well, as an ‘experienced patient’ with older health issues, I’m more concerned about seeking “protection” from, not “of” with regard to the products on offer, and the associated bureaucracy. As time goes by, it seems to have been wise to say ‘no’ a few months ago.

RickH
4 years ago
Reply to  JohnK

Ditto.

Milo
Milo
4 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

Set against this is the fact that people in vulnerable groups are more likely to seek the “protection” of these “vaccinations”. However, that is less of an issue now with a large majority “fully vaccinated”. I would have considered that I fell within those groups and not only did I not succumb to the disease they are now calling Covid 19 in the period subsequent to 20 March 2020 until now, despite the fact that if anyone should have got it and suffered very badly from it, I should have done, but I have no intention whatsoever of seeking any ‘protection’ which a ‘vaccination’ might offer me for 2 reasons. 1. I can only conclude that the dreadful virus I had in the summer of 2019 [when it was circulating in Spain and Italy, as was known from waste water sampling, and I caught it in Paris whilst in transit] must have been covid or a very close relative and I must now have natural immunity having recovered from it. And 2. I take vitamin D3 and its cofactors every single day. That being the case why on earth would I want to have the vaccine they are coercing me… Read more »

Mark
4 years ago
  • The climate scaremongers: A weekly round-up” – “Parliament should pluck up the courage to put a halt to the whole Net Zero programme and wind up the Committee on Climate Change,” writes Paul Homewood in his latest climate round-up for TCW Defending Freedom.

Indeed, but the first step to creating a climate in which cowardly politicians might be prepared to stand up to the zealotry would be to temper the constant flow of unchallenged climate alarmist propaganda, and allow proper resistance to build.

When the BBC openly made it clear a few years back that it did not feel required to give balance on key dogmas such as climate alarmism, it should have been instantly ended as a state-subsidised “national broadcaster”.

There should be no place for using people’s own tax payments to fund their systematic indoctrination.

We have some way to go before those vulnerable to attack from the elite zealots will be prepared to resist these elite dogmas openly.

RickH
4 years ago

More than 100 heads of academy trusts have written a letter demanding a large sum to help students who have fallen behind over the past year of lockdowns.”

It was always going to be just a matter of time until the academy chain money-grubbers started piling in on top of the next wave of nonsense.

In practical terms, you can’t simply make up lost time – learning isn’t a supply of beans.

Secondly, perhaps the failure of schools to keep running under government diktat warrants measures that can help, to be done at minimum cost.

Milo
Milo
4 years ago
Reply to  Mark

Good Lord, who’d have thought that Brazil could be a likely hideout for us refuseniks. I’d far rather stroll along a Brazilian beach in the sunshine to wait out the end of this nonsense than live in rainy old blighty periodically locked down, or eventually locked up for not having the jab if that is what it comes to.