Covid Vaccine Consent Form for Children Falsely Claims Jab Will Bring More Freedom

Health officials have been forced to change the Covid vaccine consent form being given to children because it wrongly tells them that getting ‘jabbed’ will free them from having to wear face masks and to follow social distancing – despite these rules being the same for all people regardless of vaccination status. The U.K. Health Security Agency (UKHSA) euphemistically referred to this untruth as a “small typo”. The Telegraph has the story.

The “easy read” forms, distributed to children aged 12 to 15, claim having a vaccine will free them from Government rules that apply to the unvaccinated. In fact, the same rules apply to all children regardless of vaccination status. …

Consent letters are being sent to parents and guardians, but children are deemed competent to make their own decision if families do not agree. [Advice on what concerned parents can do to stop this can be found here.]

The “easy read” consent form for children from the UKHSA and NHS says: “You don’t have to keep following the Government’s rules if you have been vaccinated, but they will help you to stay safe. This includes social distancing, wearing a face covering and washing your hands carefully and often.”

Molly Kingsley, from parents’ campaign group Us For Them described the advice as “exceptionally wrong”.

After being contacted by the Telegraph, officials said the form would be corrected to say: “You should keep following the Government’s rules if you have been vaccinated.”

The amendments say such rules include “wearing a face covering and washing your hands carefully and often”. …

While some of the Government’s rules apply differently to adults who have been vaccinated, no such distinctions have been made for children.

Worth reading in full.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

117 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
KidFury
KidFury
4 years ago

Typo?

Cunts.

PissedOffDad
4 years ago
Reply to  KidFury

Useless cunts would be more accurate as these 3rd rate fuckwits can’t even be bothered to proof read their own fucking lies. Give me strength.

Lockdown Sceptic
4 years ago
Reply to  KidFury

I can’t believe they lie. I thought that we could trust them.

SCANDAL NHS Track App Info Given To Police I Warned You Not To Trust Them
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSBCCHEwxNU

Upcoming peaceful stands other anti lockdown events – and we mean peaceful

Saturday 2nd October 2pm 
GRAND STAND IN THE PARK BERKSHIRE
– with a couple of guest speakers and a stroll though the town centre at the end
Reading River Promenade
Reading RG4 8BX                             

Saturday 16th October 1pm
Combined Berks/Bucks/Oxon/Surrey MEGA Yellow Board-Hold the Line
Stafferton Way  
Maidenhead  
SL6 1AY

Stand in the Park Make friends – keep sane – talk freedom and have a laugh
Reading River Promenade Sundays 10am  
Join our Telegram group https://t.me/standindparkreading
Bracknell South Hill Park Sundays 10am & Wednesdays 2pm  
Join our Telegram group http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell

PhantomOfLiberty
PhantomOfLiberty
4 years ago
Reply to  KidFury

This is the level of petty criminality – there was a typo in the passage as I recall but that was not the lie.

alw
alw
4 years ago

Yes the virus is real but the whole Covid thing is a scam rewarding friends of those in high places. There are cheaper alternatives to the so-called vaccines used widely and successfully in third world countries. We need to stop printing money and throwing it into the avaricious black hole that is big Pharma. And what about the £90billion plus spent on testing?

CynicalRealist
4 years ago
Reply to  alw

So far as kids are concerned, it’s fairly irrelevant in nearly all cases anyway – they simply won’t get ill so don’t need the “vaccine” or any other treatment.

186NO
186NO
4 years ago
Reply to  alw

Don’t think the US is a third world country …yet.

Jabba the Hut
Jabba the Hut
4 years ago

Anybody who has been vaccinated has not been truly informed.

Rowan
Rowan
4 years ago
Reply to  Jabba the Hut

Yes indeed. It is not possible to give informed consent for the Covid-19 vaccines, which are not vaccines, but depopulating agents.

karenishly
karenishly
4 years ago
Reply to  Jabba the Hut

Absolutely correct, I did have jab, at no point did they go through anything with me or mention ADRs or what to do. No one can be truly informed because there isn’t enough data, but the sneaky fuckers can’t even be honest about that. I did consider asking questions but I knew there’d be no point as they all had to stick to a script. My friend had a pretty severe ADR, GP couldn’t have cared less, never told her to report it, nothing.

bOrgkilLaH1of7
4 years ago
Reply to  karenishly

Too many teen-age kids will start hitting ICUs with Myocarditis…

https://21stcenturywire.com/2021/09/22/new-study-pfizer-vaccine-increases-myocarditis-threefold/

All part of the plan, for the depop/defrag global eugenicists wet dream…

CJ essential reading:

https://consentfactory.org/2021/09/02/the-covidian-cult-part-iii/

And the Hill us anti-COVID-vaxxers will die on:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/wnUuvUqx5dkV

sophie123
4 years ago
Reply to  Jabba the Hut

So true. And you cannot be informed, given that Pfizer are not naming all the ingredients in the vaccine, as per the details on the FDA website

I think I should be able to ask exactly what I’m being asked to inject into my body? Trade secrets or IP concerns are not my problem

Sandra Barwick
Sandra Barwick
4 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

The video showing German pathologists who have autopsied people who appear to have died from the jab is extremely worrying. On Dr Robert Malone’s twitter feed. Slides showing lymphocytic myocarditis, possibly due to an autoimmune reaction triggered by the spike, what appears to be a possible influence on cancer growth, and vascular damage.
Doesn’t mean this happens to everyone, but people need to know. These were not children. But effects on the heart look as though they are probably spread across all age groups, including the old, where they are more invisible, as Dr Kendrick predicted.
We need a copy of the script they will use to “make sure” they have so called Gillick competence. We will find for sure that consent is not informed.

crisisgarden
4 years ago
Reply to  Sandra Barwick

I will try to get hold of it when they are in the site I work at.

186NO
186NO
4 years ago
Reply to  Sandra Barwick

Dr Ryan Cole’s video testimony is equally chilling.

186NO
186NO
4 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

We will soon know as ICAN have abided by a reposes from the FDA for a formal request for an unredacted menu of ingredients having refused their legal application for the same.

I don’t care about trade secrets or IP either – patents reveal more than that.

It will either be a massive game changer or damp squib.

Annie
4 years ago

The government is lying to children.
How typical of the government.

CynicalRealist
4 years ago
Reply to  Annie

It’s no doubt become second nature to lie now as a first response.

Politicians have never been noted as the most truthful bunch, but over the past year and a half they’ve taken it to a new level – and we have never before seen this sort of epidemic of blatant lying from bodies such as PHE and the NHS.

Rowan
Rowan
4 years ago
Reply to  CynicalRealist

They have to lie, if the truth were known these people and many others, not least government ministers and “advisors” would be lynched

TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
4 years ago
Reply to  Rowan

Jean-Claude Juncker profile: ‘When it becomes serious, you have to lie’
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/10874230/Jean-Claude-Juncker-profile-When-it-becomes-serious-you-have-to-lie.html

This is the only time he told the truth.

TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
4 years ago

Jabeit Macht Frei

Annie
4 years ago

Tell me when vaxxoids stop washing their hands.
Uuuuuuuurgh.

CynicalRealist
4 years ago
Reply to  Annie

What they like doing even more is sploshing around gallons of that nasty sanitiser stuff!

J4mes
4 years ago
Reply to  CynicalRealist

Absolutely – I watched with fascination (and revulsion) as this guy at a hotel I stayed at last week splodged the stuff on, and speedily wrung his hands and lower arms like a professional! He carried his own bottle and splodged it on after every few minutes. It was like a psychological tick, a completely integrated feature to his every day life – as was wearing his face rag and jumping away from anyone who came too close.

Some covidians (I call them the Infected) I despise for being soldiers of this scam, while others like this guy I have terrible pity.

HelenaHancart
HelenaHancart
4 years ago
Reply to  J4mes

My MIL uses the loo at our place, where there is water, soap and towels, and comes out and splodges stinky hand sanitiser all over her hands, without thinking about it! It’s crazy and just a bit insulting.

CynicalRealist
4 years ago
Reply to  HelenaHancart

Has nobody told these people that soap and water is far more effective than the sanitiser gunk?

Rowan
Rowan
4 years ago
Reply to  CynicalRealist

Soap and water won’t put right an immune system that has been totally fucked up by “vaccines” that aren’t vaccines and were never meant to prevent anything.

Sandra Barwick
Sandra Barwick
4 years ago
Reply to  HelenaHancart

Have you given her a copy of the “risk less than 1 in 10,000 study to her, and explained she needs to be emptying Covid bed pans to be at risk from touch?
Having said that, this is typical MiL behaviour. Mine once came to stay, pre covid, bringing a bottle of anti bacterial washing up liquid in her luggage, which she placed at the sink and then took away with her at the end of the stay.

RickH
4 years ago
Reply to  J4mes

It was like a psychological tick”

It is a psychological tick. Deliberately induced.

disgruntled246
disgruntled246
4 years ago
Reply to  J4mes

Saw a woman doing that in the street the other day, took her ages, after she had come out of the pit of germs that was a shop. I bet it was anti bac as well and not anti virus so a complete and utter waste of time.

J4mes
4 years ago
Reply to  disgruntled246

Me and my partner had a couple in front of us in a restaurant queue a few weeks ago, absolutely drenching their hands in the stuff. They were taking too long with their madness so we jumped their space. I would normally never do something like this but there’s only so much pandering I’m willing to do to play along with the psychosis of someone I don’t know.

CynicalRealist
4 years ago
Reply to  disgruntled246

Few weeks ago I saw a woman push the button of a pedestrian crossing with her elbow (took several attempts), then get out a bottle of sanitiser and rubbed a load on her elbow with the opposite hand. Do these people not realise how ridiculous this sort of thing looks?

Anonymous
Anonymous
4 years ago
Reply to  CynicalRealist

I think it’s a combination of fear and gratefulness that finally we have something obvious we can do to make us look morally good in our own and others’ eyes. Sanitise, mask, distance, jab… So the problem isn’t these poor individuals but the meaningless lives they lived before, stemming from much deeper societal problems… We’ve lost touch with what life is about…

Sandra Barwick
Sandra Barwick
4 years ago
Reply to  disgruntled246

A complete waste of time either way. She really needs to stop breathing while inside shops – like pearl divers in ancient days.

Rowan
Rowan
4 years ago
Reply to  CynicalRealist

They can use as much sanitiser as they want, but the vaccinated are now just time bombs steadily ticking away. Will they go off tomorrow, next month or if they are really lucky perhaps next year. Dead men and women still walking!

rayc
rayc
4 years ago
Reply to  Rowan

Yeah, I’m sure you will have lots of fun as the lone survivor, just imagine all the ice cream to yourself!

sophie123
4 years ago
Reply to  rayc

That’s a very weird thing to say. Are you quite alright?

milesahead
milesahead
4 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

It’s repressed vaccine regret manifesting as petulance.

brachiopod
4 years ago

Yet another significant danger of the vaccines (not) reported widely is the design, to evade the immune system to get inside your cells and make the spike, that changes your innate immune response and makes you more vulnerable in your defence from cancers. A senior oncologist in a US cancer clinic reports that ALL his fully vaccinated patients who we in remission are no longer, with the cancers spreading and affecting other organs at a speed he has not seen before.

Exactly why are we doing this to anyone, especially children.

huxleypiggles
4 years ago
Reply to  brachiopod

Depopulation.

Rowan
Rowan
4 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

You summed it all up in just one word.

stewart
4 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

I don’t think they are deliberately trying to depopulate the planet. There would be far far simpler ways of doing that. Like letting a nasty virus loose and letting people get on with it, catch it and die.

I think this is more like a WWI situation where a bunch of psychopaths with power to lord it over everyone have an objective in mind and consider any deaths along the way justifiable (not theirs, obviously). We are acceptable collateral damage.

They’re probably trying to take a big leap forward with mRNA technology as a means of radically extending life and with the regulations in place before 2020 they just couldn’t advance quickly enough. Now that they’ve got a green light to rush things out, the technology had been approved and tested on billions. If they get their way they’ll be running tests with “boosters” for as long as they’re allowed to.

I’m pretty sure that’s what is going on. If I had billions and billions, radically extending my life would probably be the only ambition i would consider worth pursuing. I’m sure i could convince myself I’m doing it for the good of humanity.

Dodderydude
Dodderydude
4 years ago
Reply to  brachiopod

A friend of mine has been treated for terminal cancer for a couple of years now and, purportedly, the chemotherapy she was on was helping to slow it down. That was until shortly after she had ‘the jab’ earlier this year. Could be just a coincidence but within a few weeks she was told that the chemotherapy was no longer working and as a consequence the cancer was spreading extensively through her spine and liver, precisely where it had previously been kept in check (as best as these things can be). It may be just coincidence but it did cross my mind that there might be a connection.

sophie123
4 years ago
Reply to  Dodderydude

TLR 7/8

sophie123
4 years ago
Reply to  brachiopod

Ooof. I bet Pascal Soriot is pissed. First Pfizer get all the high paying US covid vaccine candidates, then they kill off all his oncology patients he was hoping would be buying his Onc drugs

Susan
4 years ago
Reply to  brachiopod

Was this Sloane Kettering in NYC? I’ve heard from nurses they are witnessing an explosion of cancers.

186NO
186NO
4 years ago
Reply to  brachiopod

More than one US medic – cannot remember if it was Fleming, Ryan, McCullough or a n other – has testified to an increase in cancer markers evident post jab.

Smelly Melly
4 years ago

Would this be the same “vaccine” that would give us so called freedom once the vulnerable had been vaccinated?

Was it only 3 weeks to flatten the curve before getting back to normal.

Was it only 3 lockdowns to save summer, Christmas, whatever.

Of course wearing useless masks have worked so well, haven’t they.

I’m fortunate enough to say that I’ve never voted for a main stream party this century. The last election I was tempted to vote Conservative but voted for the Birthday Party candidate, yes he’s a joke candidate but at least he’s honest about it.

PissedOffDad
4 years ago

btw re picture, is that Barak jabbing Greta? From one useless prick to another.

stewart
4 years ago
Reply to  PissedOffDad

Nah. That’s a picture of how the next generation will have intercourae. The exchange will take place via vaccine, because kids will grow up developing a vaccine fetish and they’ll be persuaded that the artificial version is the only way of procreating. And it will all be perfectly sanitised and without any germs exchanged, which is important because they’ll all be germophobes.

stewart
4 years ago

I think I’m catching on:

A lie told by the dictatorship that gets called out by their media friends because it embarrasses even them = a typo. (As common as an albino tiger,.one might add)

A lie told by the dictatorship that isn’t called out by their media friends = The Science

A truth that contradicts a lie told by the dictatorship = dangerous misinformation

A general truth about the dictatorship with the odd inaccuracy = a conspiracy theory

CynicalRealist
4 years ago
Reply to  stewart

You’ve nailed it!

Don’t forget the one for blatant illogical U-turns too – “Growing Evidence” (as in the U-turn over muzzles – said evidence never appears, of course)

Annie
4 years ago
Reply to  CynicalRealist

We need an encyclopaedia of Covid lies. Plenty of material on this site.

crisisgarden
4 years ago
Reply to  Annie

Happy to illustrate!

realarthurdent
4 years ago

My default thought whenever I see any information presented by the government these days is “in what way have I been lied to?”

One day the pandemic will be over, but the loss of trust in government, Public Health England, the NHS, the MHRA, the media and in fact any public institution will remain for a long, long time.

paul smith
4 years ago
Reply to  realarthurdent

The pandemic (which has never really been a pandemic in the classical sense) will NEVER be over.
Just look at the Antipodes.

Susan
4 years ago
Reply to  realarthurdent

This trust being lost might not be such a bad thing.

Jon Garvey
4 years ago

I wonder how they made the risk/benefit analysis easy-read? What’s the betting it says “The vaccine is safe and effective”?

CynicalRealist
4 years ago
Reply to  Jon Garvey

“…. and any side effects are normally mild and go away in a day or two.”

Sandra Barwick
Sandra Barwick
4 years ago
Reply to  CynicalRealist

This generation of children are going to be very, very angry and frightened when the reality becomes clear. And some of them will be very angry with their parents too.

QuickDrawMcGraw
QuickDrawMcGraw
4 years ago

Filthy lying evil scumbags!!

snoozle
snoozle
4 years ago

Well, and more importantly, it should read:
If you get vaccinated then we, the government, may decide to return to you some fo the freedoms that we despotically stole.”
I’m sure that it makes skillful use of the passive voice to hide the fact that the government should just return their freedom no questions asked.

PatrickF
PatrickF
4 years ago

Lying, fucking bastards!

PartyTime
4 years ago

The original version “You don’t have to keep following the Government’s rules if you have been vaccinated” was misleading, but true in context; it’s also true, at least in principle, for the unvaccinated.

BS665
BS665
4 years ago

It also shows that most people don’t know the status of gov rules. Where I work all but two people wear masks all day long and believe children must be tested for covid if a school asks. Since the gov NEVER clarifies ‘rules’ people accept them at face value. Of course the gov NEVER openly states that all have the right to reject a vaccine.

TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
4 years ago
Reply to  BS665

But they’re not laws.

Whenever challenged they fold (although the MSM do not seem to report this news .

BS665
BS665
4 years ago

True. So what we have is tacit dictat via ignorance. The language of rights and freedoms has totally evaporated. People are under peer pressure or just too lazy to check and challenge, making assumptions which aren’t actually valid. Yet the gov can claim they ‘didn’t force anyone’ while not being explicit about the truth. This is a brainwashing agenda.

CynicalRealist
4 years ago
Reply to  BS665

Throughout this shitshow the government (and others) have deliberately conflated laws and guidance into “The Rules” which people ‘have’ to follow. Only the sufficiently-clued-up minority actually read the legislation (which is itself usually a mess due to repeated amendments) so that they know which bits (i.e. the guidance) can be ignored with impunity.

HelenaHancart
HelenaHancart
4 years ago

Many kids are actually really confused now. At our Rebels at Roundabouts yesterday, a 16 year old came over to talk to us. He’d been jabbed (taken it for his ill mother!) But was now worried. He thought we were the militant ANTI-Vaxxers he’d heard about in MSM! When we explained we weren’t, we are pro-choice, and just trying to inform people of the risks, especially to younger children, and the lies and duplicity this government is generating, he actually listened. He asked lots of questions which we were happy to answer but we were careful not to frighten him because he’d had the jabs, and we stayed positive. He wasn’t aggressive or rude, and I think we opened his mind to break down some of the negative propaganda he’d heard about people who oppose this vaccine programme. Hopefully this will filter back to his peers and family, who knows?

dommo
dommo
4 years ago

experimental gene therapy macht frei?

you can’t make this shit up…

DanClarke
DanClarke
4 years ago

I will never be jabbed with this stuff, but its worrying reading the negative long term things about it when my son and other relatives have had it, ‘for work’

PhantomOfLiberty
PhantomOfLiberty
4 years ago

For any one with the remotest sense of legality, ethics or common decency the consent forms being sent out will be profoundly offensive: they offer false or improper inducements, the do not outline the doubtful benefits or serious known risks, or the unknown risks of products for which there is no long term data. This is not in good faith: the people doing this are behaving with complete immorality and heaven knows what their real motives are.

Lister of Smeg
Lister of Smeg
4 years ago

I can only imagine what a ‘big typo’ would consist of…

disgruntled246
disgruntled246
4 years ago

Don’t for a second believe this was an accident, it’s all deliberate.
Utter utter bastards. I am not normally a violent person but I can’t help hoping that retribution for the person who is doing this to our kids will be as nasty and vicious as is possible.

PhantomOfLiberty
PhantomOfLiberty
4 years ago

These are people playing the tricks of petty criminals – if you were dealing with a market-stall holder you would back away and not return, and they are running the government.

karenishly
karenishly
4 years ago

Sneaky little fuckers.

Annie
4 years ago

Obtaining consent via a form that contains lies, however unintentional (???…) has to be a criminal offence.

String
4 years ago
Reply to  Annie

That was what I thought – any kind of fraud, vitiates everything. Presumably this is the same with the vax manufacturers: they at present appear to have a blanket immunity from prosecution, but if that was based on a false premise, such as for example they knew the products would likely be harmful, then all bets are off.

CynicalRealist
4 years ago
Reply to  Annie

But the judiciary aren’t likely to do anything about it, even if someone manages to get it to court.

Annie
4 years ago
Reply to  CynicalRealist

If there is a law against something and that law has patently and incontrovertibly been broken, and a criminal charge is brought, the judiciary has to take notice.

Catee
4 years ago

Masks, social distancing etc are not ‘rules’, they are guidance only and they are unenforceable. That’s what they should be telling everybody.

rayc
rayc
4 years ago
Reply to  Catee

In Germany over 40 persons incarcerated in a special venue under 24h surveillance for breaking quarantine.

Catee
4 years ago
Reply to  rayc

I didnt realise we’re living in or ruled by Germany, otherwise I don’t really see the point of your comment.

TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
4 years ago
Reply to  rayc

habits die hard.

BS665
BS665
4 years ago
Reply to  Catee

It should all have been made clear as optional from day one, instead we had coercion and compulsion and lies and irrationality and propaganda. And it’s still going on.

Just a cock-up?

AN other lockdown sceptic
AN other lockdown sceptic
4 years ago

Evil morons, the lot of them.

Kung Flu Lou
Kung Flu Lou
4 years ago

‘In June, the U.S., U.K., EU, Mexico and Canada announced they would form a group to study how to safely reopen international travel.’

This will include eligible kids and adults having to be fully vaccinated to get into the US.
They’ve set the age at 12 (for now). Those that don’t get ‘jabbed’ will be discriminated against. They’re just not telling you how yet.

Cristi.Neagu
4 years ago

Reminder that they supposedly “debated” the following petition in Parliament:
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/575801Outlaw discrimination against those who do not get a Covid-19 vaccination

Long story short: It was no debate. All the MPs involved were falling over eachother to praise the vaccines. At no point did they discuss medical discrimination. Maybe it’s time to write to our representatives and let them know that we do not approve of their little hand puppet show. It is clear that they have no plan to stop any such discrimination. On the contrary, I think they are relying on it in order to give people no choice.

https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2021-09-20/debates/A52729B6-FB5D-498F-86E4-569024C22623/Covid-19Vaccinations

RW
RW
4 years ago
Reply to  Cristi.Neagu

They did mention misinformation, downright lies, and mad conspiracy theories by people with hidden agendas who are in the pockets of well-funded and well-organised anti-vax movements employed to stop others from getting their potentially life-saving vaccine.

Why some well-funded and well-organised political pressure group would want to stop others from getting life-saving vaccines is anybody’s guess. There’s nothing to be gained by that.

CrouplessCoup
CrouplessCoup
4 years ago
Reply to  RW

Yes the very words, and in Hansard!
Absolutely despicable and the heights of insolent arrogance gilding what appears as literal ignorance. Are they relying on input from HoC researchers without verifying any of what was given them? Topped with the adulation of the rascal Jenner – because he was a “Brit”!
They would do well to read chapter 6 of Professor E.M. Crookshank’s “History and Pathology of Vaccination” (1889) or Ian Sinclair’s “Vaccination: The “Hidden” Facts” (1992/94). Or any of the modern and authoritative books which impartially review the safety and efficacy of vaccines.

And that would just be a good start – since the COVID-19 “jabs” are not even traditional vaccines anyway but genetic therapy approved on an emergency use basis and without lengthy (in terms of years) human testing.

stewart
4 years ago
Reply to  Cristi.Neagu

Write to our representatives?

Good lord, I gave up on that idea months ago. Might as well write to Santa, or the tooth fairy. It’ll do about as much good.

Cristi.Neagu
4 years ago
Reply to  stewart

Well, feel free to replace that with whichever activity you find most fitting for getting your MP to do something.

RW
RW
4 years ago
Reply to  stewart

I’m thinking about doing this, provided I can come up with a sensible text. I don’t expect it to do much good. But not doing it certainly won’t do any good and debating a petition by reciting (big pharma) boilerplate propaganda while entirely ignoring its topic is a disgrace.

Sars-CoV2-vaccination should be available to anyone who thinks he needs it. But – just as with mask mandates – people who produce stuff some people don’t want to buy (or have) should not go to the government to force it onto the population.