Supermarkets Planning to Scrap Plastic Screens
In another small step towards normality, supermarket bosses have finally begun preparations to remove the plastic screens at tills that were intended to act as a protective measure against Covid. The Telegraph has the story.
Major supermarkets and non-food retailers have held early discussions with contractors over how and when they might be taken down, industry sources said. One senior executive said: “They don’t want the removal to be just another plastic crime that occurs, so we’ve started those discussions.”
One of the options being considered is a scheme to recycle the screens en masse and recover some of the costs of purchasing them at the start of the pandemic.
Supermarkets spent hundreds of millions of pounds on measures such as screens, antibacterial gel and extra staff at the doors.
The costs were cited by some retailers, including Iceland and Waitrose, as a reason not to pay back the business rates relief even as food sales boomed.
Although no deadline has been set, one removal company is putting together a plan “to get rid of them”.
After ‘Freedom Day’ in July, sandwich chain Pret was the first company to remove screens saying it would “help speed up service and ensure we limit overcrowding”. It also swiftly made face coverings voluntary for staff and customers. High street retailers were divided at the time whether to ask customers to keep their masks.
Since July, the Government has asked employers to continue to use measures to reduce potential spread of the virus, but much of the language now involves “encouraging” firms to do so.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
“Since July, the Government has asked employers to continue to use measures to reduce potential spread of the virus, but much of the language now involves “encouraging” firms to do so.”
Because they suss that the hoax is coming to an inevitable end and they don’t want it to seem as if they were ever instrumental in it. Heaven forbid.
Jesus wept.
I thought aerosol particles only travel in straight lines.
Well you learn something new every day. Who’d a thunk it?
They follow the same rules as ballistic projectiles with one exception, they evaporate on their journey so become lighter and smaller over time. What is not clear to me is whether any virus becomes more concentrated in the aerosol, or the virus components get stripped away and float about on their own.
It’s also not clear whether the virus exists, as there’s far more hype than proof. On the same basis it’s not at all clear what the “vaccines” are really for.
The vaccines were released partly to maintain fear levels but principally to enable the introduction of your “freedom passport.” And of course to allow for some rapid culling.
Now, once sufficient have been injected the passports will become mandatory. After a short interval the financial system will be collapsed to make way for Central Bank Digital Currency and then it’s
Gotcha!
You will own nothing and be happy.
This is not the Fourth Industrial Revolution this is
World War Three.
No, that is not the case. Only the larger ‘droplets’ behave in that manner.
I was simplifying. The smaller particles are “jostled about” in the air in a similar manner as Brownian motion in liquids. In still air all the particles drop eventually to the ground under gravity and depending on the local humidity can evaporate, aggregate or remain as they are. This is why mist forms on still days and eventually forms dew on the ground, but isn’t observed on windy days.
Aerosol particles are suspended in the air and behave much like cigarette smoke. In an indoor setting the concentrations of them build over time in badly ventilated spaces, and it is in these situations that most infections are believed to occur.
And only when you are standing and not sitting.
Not forgetting Brownian motion. Very small particles move in a random manner as they interact with the motion and vibration of other particles.
But are still subject to gravity so will trend downwards unless the medium is constantly agitated.
Supermarkets have totalled up the costs for keeping these clean.
Cant be recycled anyway, we have not enough lorry drivers to take them to the recycling plants.
News story today says plastic disposable plates etc. may be banned, for the good of the environment.
Bad news for the National Unworthy-of-Trust, who think it’s instant death to serve food or drink in anything that is not made of disposable plastic.
Next move: banning disposable face knickers, for the good of the environment? I look to the day.
Even if these screens do come down, how much do you bet the supermarkets and other businesses will want them back up again in the next lockdown later this year? Mind you, there will be quite a few companies that stand to make a killing from removing them, disposing of them, making new ones, and installing them, so it’s not all bad news eh?!
My first thoughts too!
Perhaps somebody will buy up large numbers of them and stash them in a warehouse somewhere, then in a few months’ time when we reach full-on kneejerk panic about a few more people having the sniffles, they can flog them back to the supermarkets at a considerable profit.
Could be a business opportunity there…
I walked up to a small cafe earlier in the week intending to get coffee and pastries with the family when I noted a board outside with their covid rules on it. I went elsewhere. I will not support business that continue with this charade
I just ignore their pathetic rules anyway .So far, nobody has challenged us.
In Kidderminster, this morning, I would say the percentage of “normals” (unmasked) has risen to about 10/15%.
Where I live on the borders of Surrey and Kent, mask wearing in our local supermarkets is down to at least 50%. Mind you there are still some morons driving alone in cars and wearing masks!
Anyone driving alone in their car masked up needs to see a physiatrist.
Along with the guy I saw a few months ago out for a jog at 3 in the morning with a face mask on.
Perhaps he was a potential burglar at that time of day.
Joking aside though, I do wonder if shops, other businesses and even Plod might have started to realise that masks are, in reality, a bad thing for potential criminals to be “encouraged” to wear, alongside the rest of us plebs, by the Gov!
It doesn’t matter if the eventual goal is digital biometric ID as something like retinal or fingerprint scans will be used in place of facial recognition software.
Poor guy. He’s obviously utterly terrified.
Belongs in the bottom block more like.
Either that, or better still a psychiatrist.
Perhaps he/she was a physiatrist?
Might even be a “behavioural psychologist “setting an example” perhaps?
As the head doctor said of Basil Fawlty, ‘there’s enough material there for an entire conference.’
They should not be driving
It is the same in Tower Hamlets.
I’ve just been on holiday in the lake district and it’s about 75% indoors / 10% outdoors but we’re I live it’s no more than 30% wearing one indoors. It’s odd how different places have such varying levels of stupidity.
After graduating, a friend of mine’s first clinical post was in the Lakes, the locals were affectionately known as Dumbrians….
Yes and it changes over time. The week following “freedom day” masks increased over the previous week. Now they seem to be gradually reducing again, hardly any in the street but still some in the supermarket and farm shop.
I lived in Kidderminster for 3 years; I’d have said the percentage of normal people wasn’t above 10% BEFORE the pandemic 🙂
I couldn’t possibly comment.
Only 10/15%? 🙁
At most.
I went to an upmarket farm shop that specialises in growing lavender. I haven’t been able to visit the shop at all this last year and a half because of their fastidious rules. But today the shop was open for “normal” business….except that every single customer and staff member obediently wore a mask and hand sanitised. I did neither. I just ballsed it out like I always have done. I made my purchases and was treated very nicely by the staff. I got stared out by others but, by God, it felt good standing my ground aa I always have done. In fact I had other unmasked people coming up to me outside and talking to me, asking questions about the farm, rather than ask staff in their masks!
I can honestly say, having never worn a mask ever – that I have not had a single bad experience. I felt a bit self conscious at first but that feeling soon passed. My wife won’t wear one either but she uses her lanyard and says the same.
All my issues about going maskless have come from NHS staff.
Unbelievable. I just tell them I don’t wear masks and leave it at that.
occasionally staff frown at me at St. George’s that’s as far as it goes
I have never worn a mask either, only a biker scarf on a few occasions until the exemption lanyards came in.
Garsons in Esher farm shop Covid rules sign gone yesterday 🙂
I do the same. It tends to be small local shops, who I would actually rather support in preference to the supermarkets, but if they are going to do this sort of thing (most common is a notice on the door saying that masks are still required) then I’m not going in there.
Do bear in mind that these notices are probably put in place to satisfy some local authority jobsworth.
I went to a small antiquarian bookshop the other day; loads of pestilential sings about face-nappies, hand washing and anti-social distancing. Inside, totally ignored.
Ignore the signs and see what they say or do, if anything.
It might originally have been to placate the local authority Covizealots, but there’s now no legal requirement so shops do not need to continue to play this game.
Agree, but the mask mandate at my local hairdressers (we ask all our customers to wear masks for the safety of our colleagues and cistomers…FFS!) now has me looking like Worzel Gummidge!
We went to a visitor centre at a country park today. Thankfully they were not covid-fanatical, and although many obediently wore masks etc, none of the staff did. In the cafe they had a notice scrawled on the (useless) plastic screen at the counter: “we don’t mind if you shout because we can’t hear you!”
Says it all!
I’m aware of an office recently leased to the NHS, fully kitted out for 70 people, desks/chairs/PCs/dual screens. It’s been sitting empty of people for the first 3 months of the lease, but you can bet your life every desk is separated by a giant transparent acrylic barrier.
Are the railway companies planning to stop behaving like twats as well? i.e. arbitrarily partitioning off bits of the train so that staff don’t have to come into contact with the dirty, filthy public, and making announcements implying but not quite stating that masks are still mandatory?
Yes, when is the DLR going to remove the front and back partitions? The best thing about riding the DLR is getting to sit in the very front or the very back seat.
This is interesting, I hadn’t thought, where does a trained carer go when they lose their job due to refusing the jab..? The NHS of course! Slightly bigger union in this one, and more of a political nightmare for Bozo et al to have to throw out ‘our heroes’.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/08/28/unvaccinated-care-home-staff-moving-nhs-creating-tricky-dilemma/
Sounds like – as usual – the kneejerk reactions haven’t been thought through. Hope it causes a lot of hassle for the politicians, anyway,
A great protest today. A really fun group of 20-30k people (just a guess). Smiling people all with one purpose, to show we are for freedom.
If you were there, you know. Next one is September 8th.
Daily mail actually covered us “antivaxers”
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9935831/Thousands-anti-vaxxers-central-London-continue-campaign-against-Covid-vaccines.html
Some sympathetic coverage from RT
https://www.rt.com/uk/533344-london-vaccine-passport-protest/
The rest are just pulp repeated from a mainstream news provider saying we caused chaos in London.
I’ve seen a bit of coverage of the rally, no mention of 20-30k people, but at least there weren’t any claims that it was just a few hundred conspiracy theorists. Maybe a sign that the coverage is starting to move in the direction of being slightly less biased.
The Daily Mail writes: “The group, none of whom appear to be wearing masks, made their way across Vauxhall Bridge and towards Westminster”. What a stupid statement.
Finding that fewer and fewer staff in my local Waitrose and M&S are wearing masks and an increasing number of customers too. I went in to an independent shop for the first time for over a year today. They enforced the masks and hand gel with a vengeance before it was mandated. I was pleasantly surprised that the staff were bare faced, the hand gel had gone and they were smiling! Shame there are still shops in the town where one still gets glared at for not wearing a mask and not using the hand gel. All in all, I think it is improving.
A lot of my local shops have removed their one way systems and stupid floor markings. Shame, as I used to enjoy deliberately walking the wrong way round the shop just to annoy covid fanatics who thought you could catch the virus if someone walked past you.
That’s the innate rebel in you. All of us sceptics must have it.
Similarly, I found that driving around Wales was much more fun when Dungford said you weren’t supposed to. And yet I’m basically a law-abiding citizen. It’s defying a diktat that is totally stupid and pointless that is so satisfying.
Driving round my part of Wales (Snowdonia) is not fun at the moment. There are an unbelievable number of tourists!
Staycations have two benefits for our government. Firstly more money is being spent in the UK, kerchung! Secondly holidays abroad mean less crowded beaches and airplanes and because hotels and restaurants are desperate for business, they’re cheaper too, so the self styled elites and their friends are happy too.
Staycations are a kind of ‘neutron bomb’ to the airlines. The people will be largely gone but the infrastructure and planes will remain, meaning that they can revert to a pre-1990s model where flying is an expensive luxury for the elites. The plebs will just have to accept that they can’t fly anymore because of ‘covid’ and ‘climate change’.
For some reason, many of the supermarkets seem to have got rid of most of the theatre, but still have pointless in and out doors, with the portico bit partitioned in half with a wall of useless crap which nobody is going to buy. Why?
too rifgt, get of them, dumb idea , caused pollution.
I’ve got to say I was surprised to hear this especially as the autumn and winter flu season will be upon us soon when I fully expect another deluge of fear porn to be projected at us. Perhaps they realise many of us won’t be cowering behind the sofa this time.
Yes remember every year on 1 November the compulsory winter muzzling to stop flu comes in.Oceania has always been at war with Eurasia.
They can take away the screens but the idiots continue to wear their filthy muzzles like badges of honour… deep state hypnosis
As viruses travel from continent to continent in the jet stream I’d of thought an open ended and sided piece of plastic sheet would be no problem for a minuscule virus to get round.
I’ve had a good laugh at all the ignorant who think a face visor is going to “protect” them. It proves another of Einstein’s theories “There are only 2 things that are infinite, the universe and human stupidity and I’m not sure about the former”.
Plastic crime? Plastic fucking crime? What the hell is that?
They didn’t think about the damage they were doing when they introduced all the fearmongering, virtue signalling bullshit but now they talk of “plastic crime”! What rabbit hole have I fallen down?
My first thought is they are not doing this because Covid is ‘over’, they are doing it because they know that vaxpasses are coming so people will no longer require ‘protection’ as only jabbed people will be allowed in the stores.
Except, of course, that the jabs and vaxpasses give about the same amount of protection as the screens!
The disgusting, unhealthy practices by Covidians, Zealots (call them what you like) always make me see red.
Travelling on a City Bus yesterday a face nappy was taking up two seats and very lonely, nobody wanted to go anywhere near this snot rag and I can’t blame them. Today walking to my local shop with a friend (that relationship has been very strained as he’s a Covidian), he dropped his nappy on the pavement, I said you are not going to wear that are you, he said yes, I said anything nasty could be on that pavement, I just got a blank look.
Here is the bus picture.
I’ve been tempted to ring the council every time I see a mask lying on the pavement or hanging on a tree (wtf?). After all, if they are so good as claimed, then they are the worst sort of hazardous waste and should be removed accordingly….
First close off pavement for 10m all round, two removal operatives should be in full haz suits, plus two supervisors who must remain at a safe distance. One operative to handle the object with pinchers, the other to open a double-lined bag and receive the hazard. The pavement should then be steam cleaned and finally disinfected. The area should then remain cordoned off for a further 8 hours. The hazardous waste should be taken directly to an incinerator. Simples!
Many of those “screens” accumulate smudges, dust and who-knows-what-else throughout the day. Unless they are cleaned regularly, I can’t see how screens help with anything. Usually one must raise one’s voice to be heard past the screen. If you believe the hype, speaking loudly and/or shouting would increase the spread.