News Round-Up

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

50 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago

“Decadence and hubris have finally brought down American empire”.

According to GB News, China are taking control of vital resources around the world, and not least the large lithium resources in Afghanistan which will be vital if we are all to have electric cars. They are taking long term strategic planning very seriously, and I repeat, they are easily going to meet their target of being the dominant global power by 2049 at this rate (though they do have some quite serious problems too).

Fingerache Philip
Fingerache Philip
4 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

As Napoleon said (apologies if I have not got it completely correct): China is a sleeping giant, beware, for when he wakes, the world will shake”.

Lucan Grey
4 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

There’s plenty of lithium around the world. It’s cobalt and nickel that are in short supply.

Annie
4 years ago
Reply to  Lucan Grey

China is collaring those supplies as well. And all ‘rare earths’.

RickH
4 years ago
Reply to  Annie

Bingo! That’s the market and capital acquisition. Quelle surprise! It was sooo difficult to see it coming.

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago

“Aussie health official flees press conference after question on spike in teen suicides”.

Yes, the DDR wanted to cover up suicide rates too. It’s disgusting what Australian (and too many other) politicians are doing to young people. Misery and stress is one of the most dangerous things there is, and these nut jobs need to understand and act on this.

Richy_m_99
4 years ago

So claims are now Pfizer jab is 90% effective after third dose. Fiunny, but I seem to recall similar claims made when the first and second doses were released. Could they possibly be lying to sell the sheep on the idea of endless jaborees.

TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
4 years ago
Reply to  Richy_m_99

Effectiveness of chocolate ration goes up from 95% to 90%!

chris c
chris c
4 years ago
Reply to  Richy_m_99

Just a thought, but if the vaccines were actually effective and harmless there would be no need to force people to have them. Perhaps they were developed to be useless and harmful in order to FORCE people to have them. The force is the important ingredient.

refusenick
4 years ago

President Hoover “A chicken in every pot!”
Biden: “A spike protein in every clot!”

Annie
4 years ago
Reply to  refusenick

‘A chicken in every pot’ was the cry of King Henri IV of France (1553-1610).
‘A shot in every arm’ isthe cry of President Macron of France ( 1977-).

Such is the relentless march of Progress.

Annie
4 years ago

Third helping of Pfizer 86% effective?

Quote:

The data were based on a follow-up study by the fund’s Division of Data & Digital Health of people who received their third dose at least seven days ago.

My italics. Hey-ho, how long before the pincushions are pricked for the fourth tine?

nottingham69
nottingham69
4 years ago
Reply to  Annie

The sheep will have upper arms looking like the treble 20 on Phil the Powers dartboard, before too long. Trump is right again.

Monro
4 years ago

Scientific bias in search of further funding is the real trend that requires modelling:

‘If the discrepancies in the troposphere were evenly split across models between excess warming and cooling we could chalk it up to noise and uncertainty. But that is not the case: it’s all excess warming…That’s bias, not uncertainty, and until the modeling community finds a way to fix it, the economics and policy making communities are justified in assuming future warming projections are overstated, potentially by a great deal depending on the model.’

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2021/08/17/new-confirmation-that-climate-models-overstate-atmospheric-warming-2/

Epidemic forecasting has a dubious track-record, and its failures became more prominent with COVID-19. Poor data input, wrong modeling assumptions, high sensitivity of estimates, lack of incorporation of epidemiological features, poor past evidence on effects of available interventions, lack of transparency, errors, lack of determinacy, consideration of only one or a few dimensions of the problem at hand, lack of expertise in crucial disciplines, groupthink and bandwagon effects, and selective reporting are some of the causes of these failures.’

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7447267/

TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
4 years ago
Reply to  Monro
SweetBabyCheeses
4 years ago

“ The competition watchdog is set to investigate sky high PCR test prices”.

Am I the only one who doesn’t give a flying fuck how much these tests cost?! That’s not just because I have no intention of ever taking one.

The watchdog should investigate if prices have been fixed, but I think that’s unlikely. The price of these tests should be set by the supply and demand forces of a free market, unless the sheeples want the Government to subsidise them?

Making them cheaper and more convenient is just going to normalise the process and we’ll be stuck with it forever. We should be advocating for no compulsory testing.

Julian
4 years ago

Totally agree. Will avoid testing if at all possible. Don’t care if they are free. Obviously for those who are forced, cheap or free is better. But the focus should be destroying the lie that they are needed/do any good.

PartyTime
4 years ago

Also, the results of all COVID tests, including antibody tests, are required to be sent to Public Health England along with your name and address, and if the result is not negative they will send your phone number and e-mail address too. There are no data protection restrictions on what they can do with the data. See for example Zava’s “supplementary privacy notice for COVID-19 testing” on this page: https://www.zavamed.com/uk/privacy.html

Norman
4 years ago

Does anyone believe Pfizer’s claims of 86% effectiveness?

TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
4 years ago
Reply to  Norman

Does it come with the option to purchase a bridge?

Robert Liddell
Robert Liddell
4 years ago

As covid hysteria wanes, climate hysteria takes another hike up.
Fascinating how bad modelling has come to be the key feature of both. I wonder if the climate modellers will take the same view as Neil Ferguson-that it was ok to be wrong in the “right”direction.

charleyfarley
charleyfarley
4 years ago
Reply to  Robert Liddell

I had hoped that the dodgy models behind the covid scare might make people pause and wonder if the same or similar dodgy methods were behind the climate scare, but there is no sign of that happening.

Perhaps in 50 years history will look back and someone will join the dots.

eastender53
4 years ago
Reply to  charleyfarley

Not if the ‘Great Reset’ cabal have their way.

“Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.”

Schrodinger
4 years ago

A tale of two graphs.

The top graph is the UK age standardised mortality figures (Gold standard data) from the UK Office for National Statistics for the last 20 years up until July this year. You’d have thought that if there had been a catastrophic virus you might have seen some dramatic upturn in the figures. Interestingly the figures in Wales have always been worse than in England (and by probably a much bigger margin than anything that can be credited to Covid19) funny how no one in Wales has been hysterically saying that we must do something about that.

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/monthlymortalityanalysisenglandandwales/june2021

Meanwhile take a look at the deaths reported as adverse events to vaccines in the USA for the last 30 years in the bottom graph. Now this is not ‘gold standard data’ as in the upper graph; but it does still have validity in demonstrating the direction of travel.

Listening to the mainstream media you would think that these two graphs were the wrong way round!

Age standardised v vaccine.jpg
PartyTime
4 years ago
Reply to  Schrodinger

Just to clarify for people in a hurry, the ONS chart is for June each year, it doesn’t represent mortality over the full year. Hence the straight-line interpolation between each June figure on the chart.

MTF
MTF
4 years ago
Reply to  PartyTime

Just read this – doesn’t that make the chart pretty much irrelevant? It just so happens that the virus was at a very low level in June 20 and quite low in June this year.

MTF
MTF
4 years ago
Reply to  Schrodinger

Do you have a link for the ASMR chart?

This is what I got from the most recent ONS Deaths Report. You obviously have something more recent.

Screenshot 2021-08-19 095208.png
RickH
4 years ago
Reply to  Schrodinger

The message of the top graph has been known since April 2000. Even the BMJ has published the data showing the essential normality of 2000 in historical terms. Deaths in the 2020-21 infection season work out as being at the 75th centile for the quarter century in England and Wales. In practical terms : we have, even recently, experienced much more virulent infections without pissing our pants.

You can forget modelled age-standardization – the simple base data shows the same : a non-event, punctuated by two sharp peaks of mortality that are balanced by less elsewhere in the year. Both peaks can be explained by policy factors adding to natural infection. The first by nosocomial infections being exacerbated mishandling of a vulnerable ‘dry tinder’ population, the second by the impact of untested ‘vaccines’ on the same group.

The adverse reaction data is irritating (not your fault), since it obviously needs standardisation to some meaningful baseline : answering shit data with alternative shit is no answer at all.

Encierro
4 years ago

The Dutch are going to introduce health passports
https://nltimes.nl/2021/08/19/parliament-supports-contribution-access-testing
Those that are not vaccinated will have to pay for the tests. It is called an incentive.

SallyM
SallyM
4 years ago
Reply to  Encierro

I read the article. It sounds like they already have a Covid passport but now they want people to have to pay for tests if they want to use a negative test to gain entry to venues.

NonCompliant
4 years ago
Reply to  SallyM

But an infectious double (soon to be triple) vaxxed individual can walk on in and kill Granny?

SallyM
SallyM
4 years ago
Reply to  NonCompliant

Of course. You didn’t think these schemes had anything to do with saving lives, did you?

BurlingtonBertie
4 years ago
Reply to  Encierro

I received a text yesterday inviting me to apply for my NHS Covid Pass.
Deleted it too.

TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
4 years ago
Reply to  Encierro

Surely people who take up the coerced-“option” of their social credit internal passport should PAY for the development costs.

Lucan Grey
4 years ago

It is vital for the development of new, fast-moving technologies, to have people collaborating in the same environment, writes James Dyson in the Telegraph.”

If that is the case, then pay people’s commuting time and expenses properly. The extra productivity will be worth it.

Otherwise it is time to adapt your out of date management style – before you are eliminated by those that will.

Julian
4 years ago
Reply to  Lucan Grey

Maybe his direct experience is that face to face contact does make a difference. I can only speak for mine which is that on balance productivity is about the same, and that those who were most productive before are more productive working remotely, and the least productive are less productive, which suggests to me that the stronger ones were carrying the weaker ones, and strengthens the case for employing people with intrinsic motivation. In workplaces where the staff are lower paid, more fungible and possibly less motivated, it’s probably easier to keep them on track if they are in a physical office being watched over, and easier for them to keep themselves on track – less self discipline is required. I think most businesses can and will and should adapt to make a hybrid model work, not to satisfy some agenda or please the government, but for the mutual benefit of staff and business. What I find harder to work out is the longer term consequences. We’re a smallish firm with low staff turnover – almost no-one has joined or left since March 2020, and many of the staff have been there decades. So there is a high degree of… Read more »

TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
4 years ago
Reply to  Julian

“In workplaces where the staff are lower paid, more fungible and possibly less motivated, “

Sounds like low hanging automation fruit…

Julian
4 years ago

Indeed it does. I’ve got mixed feelings about that.

RickH
4 years ago
Reply to  Julian

Yours is a balanced view – and the positive would be a recognition that just sitting at a desk in an office is not a necessary condition for productivity – let alone a sufficient one.

However, a lot of fruitful work is highly dependent on the subtleties of personal interaction – and this will vary with the task. I’ve done both – but appropriately – and the important interactive stuff was never displaced.

Again – follow the money. Who benefits most from the myths built around the sufficiency of distance working? Sniff, sniff.

Julian
4 years ago
Reply to  RickH

Like with the rest of covid, it will likely be hijacked by the unscrupulous to suit agendas, with little regard for truth, reality or collateral damage.

At our place, we are allowing staff to choose how often to come into the office, if at all. For those who like a buzzy workplace, the experience may be diminished, but there are also benefits and in giving people a choice we’re doing our best to please everyone. This may not be the appropriate course for other firms. A sister firm of ours is setting a minimum number of days in the office to preserve the culture. I can see the reasoning, but prefer to leave staff to choose what is best for them. Giving staff the choice also neatly sidesteps awkward culture clash over covid. Our office has no restrictions whatsoever, but anyone who feels that is unsafe is welcome to stay at home every day, forever, with no financial or any other kind of penalty. I suppose you could say we are excluding those people, but I can’t see a way out of that – if we have covid safety bollocks we’d be excluding those who want a more normal experience.

RickH
4 years ago
Reply to  Julian

 you could say we are excluding those people”

You could. But you’d be wrong. There are practical limits to accommodating personal problems.

Julian
4 years ago
Reply to  RickH

Well indeed – clearly you and I think that, because we think those people need psychiatric help, courtesy of their government’s brainwashing and their own gullibility and weakness. And fortunately for me, my boss, whose final decision in was, agrees with us. Nevertheless the practical effect of his decision was possibly to exclude the worried well. I’m not aware anyone has complained – I think we have a few worried well who are probably quite happy to stay at home for other reasons too, not the least of which is avoiding public transport, which some of them have spoken of to me as if it’s a sure route to catching the Black Death. Our office is in London and while trains and tubes are less crowded than they were, there are still plenty of people out and about and anyone who is happy to “brave” that is probably happy enough to be in a normal office with no bollocks. I expect the safety bollocks I have seen documented in big corporate offices is about arse covering rather than any reaction to concerns of those staff actually prepared to make the journey in.

RickH
4 years ago
Reply to  Julian

the safety bollocks I have seen documented in big corporate offices is about arse covering”

Undoubtedly. I suppose it does have the virtue of exposing the incidence of massively poor intelligence, courage and leadership skills in management. (I’ve noted before the growth of the ‘floating turd’ syndrome generally that underpins all this).

At least I don’t have to contend with a work situation, having retired a while ago. I can’t turn off the wind-up that is Covid, but at least I’m not forced into some situations and confrontations.

Julian
4 years ago
Reply to  RickH

Yes, the mediocrity at pay grades well into six figures is quite dispiriting. Thank God my boss is a sceptic. It must be very uncomfortable for those bullied into an office surrounded by covidians.

steve_z
4 years ago

interesting piece on GB news last night

they had a US author (of Indian heritage) who has written a book called Woke Inc (from memory)

he reckons USA is losing its moral authority because of its self-loathing wokeness

when Biden says America is institutionally racist he can’t also hold up America as a beacon to the world

when he mentions the camps in China they just say USA should stop the police genocide of blacks

either America is a beacon to the world or it isn’t – Biden reckons it isn’t

TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
4 years ago
Reply to  steve_z

Biden hates America and Americans. He shares that hate with the party fanatic wing.

RickH
4 years ago
Reply to  steve_z

 USA is losing its moral authority”

I never noticed that it had any. Just the usual hypocritical self-righteousness that most nations share.

Mark
4 years ago
Reply to  RickH

Rather more than the usual share, I think, in fairness.

JayBee
4 years ago

Splendid speech and article by George Christensen.
Sadly, no such intelligent politicians to be in sight in the RoW.

Sceptic down south
4 years ago

Schrodinger/MTF

I have no idea if this works (I have never tried to include an image before), but from the same ONS data, here is the total England mortality data (age stratified and per capita – July to June basis).

Ordinarily, troughs are followed by peaks (dry tinder effect etc). As you can see, there is a significant trough through 2018/19 (it carries on up to Spring 2020). In that context, what happened in Spring 2020 is considerably less significant than first appears.

Others have done this with data on a June to May basis. I’ve also added a 5 year trend line plus variance from trend to make the trough/peak variance more obvious.

Calendar comparisons of 2020 with 2015-19 rather conveniently include the 2018/19 trough in the comparable, and then (as a consequence) portray the expected reversal in 2020 as more exceptional than it is.

LDS England mortality.jpg