The Red Screen of Death

Some of our readers may have noticed a couple of days ago that our post entitled “The BBC versus Trump” (not, for the sake of clarity, the full article of the same name by Freddie Attenborough) elicited an excited reaction from their web browser: the “red screen of death”. Google had decided that our website was doing something nefarious, and even though they couldn’t quite manage to be specific about what it was – and even though they sent me an email alert (thanks!) – neverthless when I loaded their helpful webpage and dug in to to the details they only told me that the reason was “N/A”. They suggested we were possibly running a phishing scam, or maybe running malware… they couldn’t be precise, but they made certain that our readers knew about it. Nice of them.

But besides making it very difficult for our readers to view our website (or at least, that particular page), the repercussions included the inability to forward our email newsletter to others, the inability to post links on other sites – a reader couldn’t post a link to the site under an article in the Times, for instance – and even (comically, at least to me) anti-virus alerts from McAfee. All very troubling to a webmaster, I’m sure. But I knew from the moment I got the email alert from Google that it was almost certainly bunk.

This is a screenshot of part of the alert I received from Google:

The claims being made by Google were vague, bordering on evanescent. It was “[s]ocial engineering content”, they said. A “security” issue, they said. But it only affected one page of our WordPress site? Hmmm. So I looked into it, and found nothing nefarious by way of actual security threats – nothing of the sort a computer “scientist” would recognise, at least. Nothing that might indicate that the page was (in Google’s words) “hacked or might include third-party resources such as ads that are designed to trick users into installing malicious software or giving up sensitive information”. There were some comments talking about anti vaccine-passport rallies (uh-oh!), but nothing involving “hacking” or scary “third-party resources”.

Google offered me the opportunity to request a security review, with a nice blue button that I could click in the Google Search Console. But they hadn’t counted on my resources and ingenuity. What I chose to do was… nothing. And within 24 hours, Google decided to simply whitelist (sorry, GCHQ!) that page. Suddenly, the imaginary threat was gone.

Interesting, one might think.

This is almost certainly not about any kind of technical/IT issue, at least as far as I can see. This is about what Google calls in the above screenshot “problematic content”. It’s about what we, and you (our readers) choose to say on this website. And while this “security” issue magically disappeared due (I imagine) to a later recognition by their algorithm or their humans that anti vaccine-passport rallies are not quite the same as anti-vaccine rallies, nevertheless we’re getting ever closer to the point at which Google might become software that we’re no longer able to uninstall.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

57 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Julian
4 years ago

We’re in a war for the future of freedom and civilisation and Google are the enemy
Our government are not on our side

Mark
4 years ago
Reply to  Julian

Indeed

Julian
4 years ago
Reply to  Julian

We’re losing the war and it’s probably unwinnable for many generations. The USA, arguably the most libertarian country in the rich world, elected Biden. A billionaire incumbent President with a reasonable record and lots of support failed to get re-elected. Admittedly he didn’t do himself many favours at times, but his real fault was upsetting the established order and Big Tech. I didn’t like him much, though I thought he was preferable to Clinton and Biden, but if Trump lost, what chance do we stand. (I’m not comparing us to Trump, just making a point about resources and the enemy).

artfelix
4 years ago
Reply to  Julian

I mean, they didn’t actually elect him. I think we all know that.

Julian
4 years ago
Reply to  artfelix

I don’t know enough. I think I would assume Biden was elected “fairly”, with the support of the media, Big Tech and celebrities. among others. But for the purposes of my point it doesn’t matter and it’s a rabbit hole.

milesahead
milesahead
4 years ago
Reply to  Julian

It’s a rabbit hole, true, but I think it stretches credulity to beyond breaking point to think that Biden gained 12 million more votes than Obama (and his total was the record up to that time).

Paul B
4 years ago
Reply to  milesahead

Is the rabbit hole where they buried all Trumps votes?

RickH
4 years ago
Reply to  Julian

“I think I would assume Biden was elected “fairly” … “

Yes – as much as Trump was elected on a minority of the popular vote.

It’s all beside the point – which is all about big money and sectional fights for control.

I’m afraid that seeing Trump (a noted privileged fraudster of limited ability and insight) through rose-tinted spectacles provides no answer at all as an alternative to Biden. Just look at his slavish incomprehesion re. Palestine as just one example. It’s all the same pile of excrement.

Mark
4 years ago
Reply to  Julian

The only good aspect to all that truth is that the very fact of the very open and obvious intervention to defeat Trump, the gross unelectability of the Biden team, has opened a lot of eyes,. and will open many more as the profound deficiencies of the Biden administration become clearer, as each day passes.

BoycottEuropeanEmpire
BoycottEuropeanEmpire
4 years ago
Reply to  Mark

The sad fact that Quid Pro Joe is unwell will become increasingly difficult for the Axis of Bullsheet to deny.

Think Harder
Think Harder
4 years ago
Reply to  Julian

I’m not certain they didn’t elect him.

WorriedCitizen
4 years ago
Reply to  Julian

Biden won nothing. Stolen election, 100% I’m no Trump supporter but he was inconvenient to this plan so had to be removed at all cost hence no investigations. So rich he couldn’t be bought. Biden will be gone by year end one way or another and KamelaToe will be President in both name and as she is now in action. Still, at least the yanks have 300m+ guns at their disposal to stand their ground.

Londo Mollari
4 years ago

Maybe Toby, you will now realise that this is not a policy blunder – we are headed into full-on totalitarianism.

Mark
4 years ago

“social engineering content”

LOL! Pretty Orwellian.

And a great irony since social engineering is exactly what the mainstream media and big tech are engaged in.

All the more reason to look for ways to change our laws to bring this social engineering activity under a degree of control:

IN PROTECTION OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH
A Legal Analysis
By FRANCIS HOAR
Foreword by JONATHAN SUMPTION
Preface by LAURENCE FOX

chris c
chris c
4 years ago
Reply to  Mark

I’ve noticed that Firefox flags up a load of sites such as Off-Guardian as potentially dangerous, I have to expressly permit access then go through the same with Kaspersky. Meanwhile I can access most of them with Opera. Something seems to be up with their certificates. Strangely Conservative Woman is not (yet) affected.

Think Harder
Think Harder
4 years ago

Message sent between lawyers, sums things up: We are ok in ourselves but exasperated that we are sliding into totalitarianism under the guise of managing a pandemic and too many people are complacent or purposely turning a blind eye. The commons have just passed a law making noisy protest ( incl by one person), punishable by 10 years in prison, there is a bill to decimate judicial review which will curtail judicial oversight of the exec, reducing hugely a check on gov power, the online safety bill will allow the state to regulate everything online and remove “disinformation”. A law to force people to vaccinate or lose their job and to not allow relatives to visit loved ones in care homes if not vaxxed was introduced last min as a statutory instrument and given only 90 mins for debate . When it passed the next day there was a mainstream media news blackout on it. I knew it had passed and put on the Today Prog to see how they would cover it and they didn’t. If you did a Google search the next day it brought up no results for it at all. The gov is now consulting on laws to protect the state… Read more »

debra
4 years ago
Reply to  Think Harder

Please may I copy and share your comment?

patb
patb
4 years ago
Reply to  Think Harder

We learn that Ian Rons can actually write. He normally ignores emails, notably about how this website makes money out of you all.

Jane G
Jane G
4 years ago
Reply to  patb

You exclude yourself from ‘all of us’? If you don’t like this place you can go and do the other thing.

Mark
4 years ago
Reply to  Jane G

What amused me about his implicit accusation “how this website makes money out of you all” is that he says it like it’s a bad thing. I suspect I’m not alone in hoping that the people running the site have found ways to monetise and therefore sustain it.

Mike Yeadon
4 years ago
Reply to  Think Harder

Excellent post. I have left U.K. and I don’t expect to return.
Mind you, I don’t expect to live very much longer. So I’ve not ‘run away’ but ‘towards the sound of gunfire’.

If we cannot hold open under normal rule of law a single southern US state, the world is lost. So I’ll join battle there. Wish me luck.

dhid
dhid
4 years ago
Reply to  Mike Yeadon

Good luck!

186NO
186NO
4 years ago
Reply to  Mike Yeadon

I do wish you luck and thanks for enabling me to follow my instinct – From you to Reiner Fuellmich/Dr David Martin/Dr Peter McCullough/TGBD/Prof Gupta et al/Del Bigtree – and then to the truly evil SAGE cabal ( with honourable exceptions to these from within who have dared to express dissent )/ Fauci, Farrar, Daszak, Bat Lady, Drosten, Vallance in his guise as head of R&D for GSK/BMGF/Zuckerberg…..so it goes on.

I still am deeply unsure “what I now know”; but from a previous experience of the criminality of “big business” (which tried – and failed – to destroy me and my family) in an unconnected sphere, I hope my sanity holds out to continue to try and make some sense of this chaos.

Watch your back.

Emerald Fox
4 years ago

Getting to the point now:
“It’s time to deal with unvaxxed people”
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/it-039-s-time-to-deal-with-unvaxxed-people_vTAm78BG7m8boSQ.html

Annie
4 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

Check out the comments and you’ll feel better.

Paul B
4 years ago
Reply to  Annie

His account on tiktok is labelled as satire and his account name features soy

rtaylor
4 years ago

Other browser options are Brave who also released a search engine recently. I’ve seen Discord (Microsoft owned?) groups being targeted and shut down the last few days too.

It is now very important to maintain an email list. Have a list printed out and update it monthly. Sites come and go, but the list stays with you.

Julian
4 years ago
Reply to  rtaylor

Canada Sceptic on the subreddit a lot of people who post here use keeps an email list in case that gets shut down: https://reddit.com/r/LockdownSceptics/

vlysander
vlysander
4 years ago

One day they will use the kill switch…end of free internet forever. You will only be directed to certain “government” sanctioned websites and information that is the truth according to them. As the New Zealand PM jacinda ardern said – discard all other information on vaccines we will tell you the truth.

Nigel Sherratt
4 years ago

DuckDuckGo (Google steals everything including your soul)

peyrole
peyrole
4 years ago
Reply to  Nigel Sherratt

The ‘duck’ is dead, its as bad as google.

Jane G
Jane G
4 years ago
Reply to  peyrole

What’s wrong with it?

JanineE
JanineE
4 years ago
Reply to  peyrole

I switched to DuckDuckGo and installed an Ad Blocker a few months ago and felt slightly less monitored by Big Brother. On DDG make sure you set Safe Search to Off.

snoozle
snoozle
4 years ago

Isn’t google’s action there libel?

Norman
4 years ago

I have spent a large part of my working life dealing with software people. Some are very normal, but they do seem to attract more than their fair share of oddballs and people with personal and social issues.

patb
patb
4 years ago

We learn that Ian Rons can actually write. He normally ignores emails, notably about how this website makes money out of you all.

Julian
4 years ago
Reply to  patb

How much money does it make?

When you say “make”, do you mean there is a profit left after paying for servers and paying staff the going hourly rate for the work they do?

BoycottEuropeanEmpire
BoycottEuropeanEmpire
4 years ago

Google turned ‘don’t be evil’ into ‘let’s be as evil as we can be, whilst not quite as bad as China.’

Justablokewhoasksquestions
Justablokewhoasksquestions
4 years ago

Gave up on Google years ago. My default search engine of choice these days is Mojeek: UK-based, privacy guaranteed. Other providers are available too, of course.

bowlsman
bowlsman
4 years ago

Big brother baby.

Epi
Epi
4 years ago

May be being stupid here but anyone else experiencing difficulties not getting anything after the Daily Round Up? Since we’ve changed to The Daily Sceptic there’s been nothing on Masks, the GBD, Woke Gobbledegook or And Finally or don’t we get these articles with the new format? Sorry I know this is off the subject but just wondering what’s happening. Cheers.

Victoria
4 years ago

Use alternatives to google such as SwissCows, DuckDuckGo, etc. They do not censor what you can see and do not save all your details.

Also look into safe email providers such as http://www.ProtonMail.com (Swiss encrypted) that also provides a VPN

BS665
BS665
4 years ago

Don’t wish to sound paranoid, but I very much doubt that any browser is fully secure. Bods in a doghnut in Cheltenham are reading this right now. So say it anyway.

hippogriff
hippogriff
4 years ago

If anyone needs information about privacy on the internet and with tech in general Rob Braxman is helpful. There is Reclaim The Net as well.

Mike Yeadon
4 years ago

I think it’s worse than you think. Imagine a world in which I cannot read it hear what other humans say or write?
And vice versa?
Beware that plus a financial system reset plus….
This winter.

Malcolm Ramsay
Malcolm Ramsay
4 years ago
Reply to  Mike Yeadon

I’m certainly expecting things to get even worse before they get better, Mike, but I think it’s worth bearing in mind that (using an analogy I hope will resonate with you) the fever stage of an immune response probably isn’t a good time to determine the prognosis. While it’s important to acknowledge how badly things could turn out, it’s also important to recognise the potential for improvement. As I see it, the current situation can’t be properly understood without considering the forces operating within the collective unconscious – among which, I’d suggest, is a kind of metaphysical immune system which operates to defend against societal disease. As to what the current disease might be: misgovernment has plumbed new depths over the last eighteen months but it has been with us for a very long time and, in my experience, most people have tended to see it as part of the natural landscape. In fact, it is almost entirely the product of flawed systems that give power and influence to people who cannot be trusted to act with integrity. Blaming those people, though, risks diverting attention from our own collective responsibility: if we cannot say how a mature society should govern… Read more »

Mike Yeadon
4 years ago
Reply to  Malcolm Ramsay

Malcolm, I’m looking at things through a black mirror atm I’m well aware that my perspectives are all over the place and I’m unlikely to have balance. But the reasons I am like that is that I can see the possibility of deliberate utter carnage. It does depend on what’s in the script for us. And I’m not privileged to know it’s details. Best case we stabilise under a VaxPass controlled social credit system. I have to say I give around a 0% probability to that outcome. The track records of those we know are involved definitely involve depopulation. There are no easy ways to do this without being rumbled whatever they might tell us. So I anticipate a deliberately engineered major crisis like food shortages & financial crisis to ensure no one has spare time to organise anything but their next meal. It’s very easy to execute. As I’ve said before, I’d love to be wrong & to join in on a great big laugh at my expense. That would be wonderful. “Whew! Me & my imagination, eh?” Obviously I’d never be hired to think & plan ever again but as I am not interested in that anyway, it’s… Read more »

Malcolm Ramsay
Malcolm Ramsay
4 years ago
Reply to  Mike Yeadon

Thanks for the reply, Mike. I certainly wouldn’t want you to stop articulating your worst fears, because what you’ve been doing over the last year has been enormously valuable. I hope you can find some new anchors, though, both for your own peace of mind and for the influence you can have on others – part of the strength of your message last year lay in the balance of your perspective, and I can’t help feeling that you’ll help more people once you’ve found a new balance. I appreciate that you’ve come a long way since you first spoke out. A few days ago I watched your discussion with Del Bigtree and was struck by how your perspective has changed since I first heard you, in your interview with James Delingpole. The darkness you’re going through was very clear in your talk with Del but it’s hard for me to imagine what it must be like for you (I ‘took the red pill’, as it were, as a teenager back in the seventies and my journey over the last forty-plus years has been in the opposite directiion, learning to appreciate the worthwhile aspects of a system that I had initially rejected… Read more »

jmc
jmc
4 years ago

As I mentioned before in the forums Google has had teams in place since almost the very beginning (the key people are in Mountain View) who are actively censoring both search results and search content. Within a few months (mid summer 2020) the level of censorship was so heavy handed that very focused search queries for pre 2020 scientific papers would return no relevant results. Even though the exact same query a few months before return the relevant papers. As did DuckDuckGo. The Google censorship teams are in close liaison with the various DC bureaucracies that want to keep the media narrative “uncontaminated” by other views. And hard information. Since last November this censorship has now spread to anything involving Trump, election fraud, etc. The content censoring software that filters out all “undesirable” search results is the basis of the software used to mark the Trump article here as “dangerous”. The text used in the warning is deliberately disingenuous. It takes a real technical expertise to create a phishing page in WordPress. And is very easy to detect. To give you an idea of just how wide ranging the political censorship is in Google search results. It is now far… Read more »

Mike Yeadon
4 years ago
Reply to  jmc

Very interesting & helpful thank you.
I know for certain that I read 2-3 papers last year concerning SARS (2003) spike protein.
I recall demonstration that spike induces platelet aggregation.
I worked hard last night for a paper I’m drafting.
No such papers now show up.

chris c
chris c
4 years ago
Reply to  Mike Yeadon

Here’s a weirdness. I’m a nothing, especially compared to you, but I have been constantly banned from posting on WordPress blogs, including those owned by friends and people I know. Originally I would be banned from all blogs under any username, but temporarily. At some stage the pattern changed and I was banned permanently by specific username. I got up to four banned usernames on Malcolm kendrick’s blog before admitting defeat.

The only thing I can think of is that I pissed someone off. The only culprits I can think of were a dietician and a high carbing diabetic but neither are competent to do this. Maybe they have friends in 77th. Anyway it’s weird so I can only imagine what someone important and knowledgeable has to go through.

I recall Google Blogger deleting a bunch of low carb blogs as “spam” which is why so many switched to WordPress. Then Facebook deleted a huge (over a million members) “Banting” page in South Africa but strangely not the equivalent sized page from Nigeria. And let’s not even mention Wikipedia.

jmc
jmc
4 years ago
Reply to  chris c

I always have had my doubts about WordPress. The software is open source but the parent company which is basically just another dot com scam ( a couple of hundred mil $ raised) is run by a complete raving left wing nutcase.

Even by San Francisco standards the guy is very far left / ultra woke. They only hire people who are very left wing or who have drunk that particular political Cool Aid. In fact by local standards their hiring practices are pretty unique for an organization that is not overtly a politically motivated leftist lobbying / activist organization.

So yes, exactly the sort of people who would actively censor and suppress all opinions they dont like. Completely intolerant with no belief in free speech. But like all companies like that in the past once the money runs out they are gone. Or rather “acquired”. But you can be certain that Mr Left Wing Loony will have his personal 10M plus loot safely stashed away. After all the employees have been fired.

jmc
jmc
4 years ago
Reply to  Mike Yeadon

Before Google started “shaping” the search results, i.e censoring, not only the main papers come up in the first page of results but most of the cited papers too. DuckDuckGo does not censor the results but does not do as good a job of returning the cited papers. So I found the best way of finding relevant papers is to look for a general or subject survey paper on the subject of interest then manually search on the cited paper titles and authors. A bit more time consuming but it usually turns up the paper you are looking for.

TheBigman
TheBigman
4 years ago

Whether “anti-vax” or “anti-Vax Pass” it shouldn’t make a difference in a free society.

Perhaps that is my dumb opinion.

Free speech is just that; free. As soon as you have to ‘pay’ for speaking either in the form of being censored or banned or only permitted in certain areas then you are already in an authoritarian mess.

Christopher Hitchens makes a great case for free speech, I don’t agree with him on much but I did share his absolutist view on free speech. For the sake of our health, wealth and liberty you should too.

bradw4
bradw4
4 years ago

On the issue of Google warnings, the rebranded Daily Sceptics email was flagged up by my Gmail account as a potential phishing scam on the day of its relaunch.

This was patently nonsense. Evidently, Google is now diversifying into the business of thought policing.