Thousands More Women Report Changes to Periods After Covid Vaccination
By late June, Britain’s medicines regulator had received reports from almost 4,000 women who have suffered period problems after taking a Covid vaccine. Since then, around 9,000 more women have reported changes, according to Sky News.
The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency has so far received more than 13,000 reports from women across the country who have experienced changes to their period after having the vaccine.
Experts say there is no evidence to believe the coronavirus vaccine affects fertility, but there are reports that some women are refusing to get the jab.
Dr Viki Male, a Reproductive Immunologist at Imperial College London, said women should feel confident getting the jab and that reports of changes are not unexpected, as similar reactions have been observed with the flu vaccine.
She told Sky News that 25% of women who contract Covid also see changes to their period.
“We know that sex hormones affect the immune system and the immune system affects sex hormones and we have some evidence that the flu vaccine, given a certain time in your cycle, can slightly dampen the amount of progesterone you have, and it’s the balance between oestrogen and progesterone that builds up and breaks down the lining of your uterus.
“So if these get slightly out of whack then we might expect to get a heavier period or a later period,” she said. …
Experts are concerned that increasing numbers of young women are hesitant about the vaccine or refusing to have it altogether, putting pressure on the Government’s plan to unlock the country as it relies heavily on high numbers getting vaccinated.
Dr Male said there is no scientific link between the vaccination and fertility issues and warned that women can be more susceptible to problems during pregnancy if they contract Covid.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Sly news at it again:
“Women’s fears, in part rooted in conspiracy theories promoted by anti-vaccination groups online, are unfounded, experts agree, as there is no evidence to believe the COVID jab affects fertility. Women’s fears, in part rooted in conspiracy theories promoted by anti-vaccination groups online, are unfounded, experts agree, as there is no evidence to believe the COVID jab affects fertility.”
Personally I’ll be waiting for the studies that prove there IS NO EVIDENCE to believe the COVID jab affects fertility. There is no evidence to believe my IQ isn’t 1,000,000, and that I’m not the most desirable male on the planet, just saying 🙂
Does it never occur to these morons that it isn’t conspiracy theories presented by anti-vaxxers that are the problem? It’s that people can see with their own eyes what is going on, and know they are being lied to by the supposed ‘experts’? Don’t feel the need to answer, it’s pretty much rhetorical!
No, because hoodwinking people into denying their own lying eyes and lived experience is the entire point of propaganda.
Yes I really do think it occurs to them that people who oppose the ‘vaccine’ are the problem, because this is now past the point of which we can argue whether or not the government and the globalists are conspiring to kill and maim and make as many people as possible infertile. It really is a depopulation programme. They see us as a massive hindrance.
There might not be evidence yet, but how many of those 13,000 women will have problems trying to conceive in the future? And overall, what will happen to those who’ve been jabbed when the winter viruses return?
Fertility rates have fallen over the past years anyway. It seems common for young couples to have problems conceiving so will any alarm bells ring when that problem gets even worse. Vaccinating, young, fertile women for a disease at which they are only at a tiny risk always seemed to me to be an absolute no no but am amazed at the people who hear no bells at all.
sorry Paul please accept my apologies I did not notice your quotation marks, I thought it was your own thoughts you were expressing. Apologies, Mia Culpa
Ah well if the ‘experts agree’ it’s all alright then!
Devi says it’s fine….
Are she and Viki Male related?
How can you claim this? the drug is less than 2 years old, it was rushed through by Government, there is no long term data of side effects, most drugs are tested for several years before they are approved, this is not the case here, the Pharma are not held negligent for side effects, as the Government has released them from liability and the drug has not been licensed. Government will pay a maximum of 110 or 120k I don’t recall the exact figure if you are 60% minimum disabled by the drug. I have had every vaccine going. I am not an anti vaxxer, I am a woman however; I am a female who has been through the menopause (due to surgery). However I have friends who had also finished the menopause whose periods have started again post vaccine. I have a younger friend who since the injection is now confined to the house 2-3 days of every month because her period is so heavy. Thats just my experience. I have no daughters but If I did I would not want them going within a country mile of this stuff. I think Paul with all respect you need to… Read more »
Read Paul’s post again…
Edit – I just read again and noticed your other, more recent post! I should take my own advice about reading again…
Thanks for re-reading, although not allowing men to voice their opinion on things that affect women isn’t something I agree with. People have expertise and men have daughters, wives and mothers, sisters and grandmothers.
They should try telling that all the affected women in Mumsnet, a platform not normally associated with “conspiracy theories.”
One of the people promoting these ‘conspiracy theories’ is the doctor who invented mRNA vaccines.
Is ICL a pro-vaccine group by any chance?
Of course there’s no evidence. How long have we been doing these “vaccinations “for?
Sky article is written by a political correspondent which tells you all you need to know
Dr Viki Male, a Reproductive Immunologist at Imperial College London, said women should feel confident getting the jab and that reports of changes are not unexpected, as similar reactions have been observed with the flu vaccine.
Err….The same flu vaccine that until now has been given to the over 65’s? Not having a lot of menstruation then are they? It really is becoming a pain in the arse that they NEVER feel they have to bring out the slightest bit of science to back-up their blathering. Thousands of women having menstrual problems after a vaccine is neither normal or usual for Gods sake!
Dr Male ofImperial College says the stabs are safe and effective shock.
Theres no reports of sudden onset of menopause in the over 65s?
What an appalling bullying article.
“Experts say there is no evidence to believe the coronavirus vaccine affects fertility”
I’d rather there is evidence that confirms the corornavirus vaccine does not affect fertility but any such evidence will not be available until more than 9 months after vaccines started to be given to women of childbearing age.
I love the use of language. “There is no evidence to confirm…”
Well, there’s no evidence to confirm that I dropped an M&S deoderant bottle on the bathroom floor this morning.
But guess what? I DID drop an M&S deoderant bottle on the bathroom floor this morning.
But can YOU find the evidence? Good luck.
There are so many gallows we’re going to need in the coming months/years…
Paris used to have a multiple gallows, called Montfaucon.
Did the job a treat.
“There is no evidence to confirm…”
Yes, that really does piss me off!
Evidence of the effect on female embryos in pregnant women given these experimental vaccines probably won’t emerge for 30 years.
Would Dr Male, being so certain, like to pledge her doubtless very nice house to provide compensation if she turns out to be wrong? That would be reassuring – and no risk for her, of course.
How can there be a scientific link between the vaccine and fertility when they have not had time to establish the science. The link will be found years down the line. Utter insanity.
How can Dr Male (not a great name for something that affects women) make the claims that she/he does? this is a new product, it is under emergency use regs, it has been around for less than 2 years, there is no study or research done into longterm effects because it is so new, so the claims that there is no link is based on zero evidence because the product has not been used for long enough. Are we just expected to take the product on this Doctors say so? where is the evidence to back up the statement
The controllers love it when their journalist pets quote people with ironic and/or inappropriate names in their articles. They see this as a fun way to troll the serfs.
“We know that sex hormones affect the immune system and the immune system affects sex hormones…”
I agree with that. 1 month into the first lockdown, after some basic research into strengthening the immune system, my wife and I started supplementing with Vitamin D. Another month later, she fell pregnant. After years of trying.
That basic research into Vitamin D and the immune system was refuted by Matt Hancock in parliament several times. I don’t know how many lives that cost. It was almost as if he was trying to get the death rate up, such as the denial to established and basic science.
And now we are supposed to put faith in an experimental
vaccinegene therapy that is unlicensed, in which the makers are immune from prosecution, and which data suggests the free spike protein doesn’t stay localised. And the resulting lipids gather in the ovaries.I mean, why the ovaries FFS? Seriously?
Take it at your peril is all I would say.
Congratulations on the pregnancy at least something good has come out of being Lockdown!
Wish you joy!
I asked my wife and both her periods since her first dose have been very heavy. Her boss had two periods in a month after her first dose.
Something is rotting in Denmark
So thats 13,000 at 1-10% reporting!!
Exactly, and it’s not a subject likely to be at the forefront of any conversation so it’s probable that the under – reporting is out by a factor in excess of ten.
Which age group is the flu jab targeted at?
It isn’t young fertile women, at least I was never offered one during my fertile years – even those spent working in healthcare.
So using the flu jab as ‘reassurance’ doesn’t really stack up, but then Imperial College London. ‘Nuff said.
Conspiracy Theorist !!!!
Nothing to see here.
Just take the shot !!!!
Imperial College, London.
Enough said.
the pro-vaccine group. For obvious reasons.
We know the lipid nanoparticles and the spike protein both target the ovaries.
The ovaries produce not only the egg, but oestrogen and progesterone which regulate the development and maintenance of the endometrium, the lining of the womb.
An assault on the ovaries would dysregulate the ovarian cycle and result in the menstrual problems reported.
“Scientists” have been researching sterilising vaccines for use on pest animals for years, so they know how to approach this task.
Immunization with recombinant murine cytomegalovirus expressing murine zona pellucida 3 causes permanent infertility in BALB/c mice due to follicle depletion and ovulation failure
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18667753/
I’ve just listened to a podcast (Bret Weinstein) with the doctor who invented the mRNA vaccine technique, who is alarmed at the way it can spread through the whole body and not stay local to the shoulder muscle as normal vaccines do. It doesn’t spread uniformly, it concentrates in certain organs, in particular the ovaries. On that basis he recommends against young women getting the vaccine.
“Experts say there is no evidence to believe the coronavirus vaccine affects fertility,”
How could they possibly know? They don’t even know what the correct dosage of the vaccine is. They don’t know whether having the vaccine alongside taking other medication could cause side-effects. They don’t know whether it causes people to miscarry or spontaneously abort, although there is evidence that it does.
They know NOTHING about this vaccine.
Re taking with other meds: I have logged yellow card records for the az jab apparently affecting anti epilepsy drugs, and ppis (for stomach issues) .
The ‘experts’ clearly aren’t interested in yellow card data, which is evidence that a problem may exist – they only want evidence that confirms it.
For a number of issues problems seem to arise around 2 weeks after the jab, yet advice is that side effects mostly arise within a couple of days and that 2 weeks is when the vaccine takes effect and you can resume your life.
My Dad’s reaction – bleeding and clots – was 10 days after his 2nd AZ dose. He’s not having a booster or the flu vaccine this year.
There is no evidence because to believe because there actually wasn’t any studies done to produce any evidence one way or the other. They were rushed to market in 6 months so how could they obtain any evidence???
Yeadon, Weinstein, Malone.. lots of doctors have worries about where the spike proteins end up…
As I’ve commented before, I would draw people’s attention to the Dark Horse podcast – https://www.bitchute.com/video/TH2HAmTp40xq/ that references the analytical work done by Tess Lawrie. Tess can also be found in discussion on the Uncommon Wisdom podcast –
https://www.uncommonwisdom.online/post/podcast-truth-and-deception-the-conscience-of-public-health .
Which boils down to the empirical fact that the spike protein that your own cells are made to produce is bio-active and floats all over your body (it wasn’t supposed to). Tess’s work has shown that there are high concentrations of the protein (or it’s lipid markers) in the ovaries.
Darkhorse is 3hr long and worth listening to but there are clips which Bret has now posted on Odysee.com https://odysee.com/@DarkHorsePodcastClips:b , in order to get away from the ongoing censorship of YouTube.
VACCINES “UNLIKELY TO COMPLETELY STERILIZE A POPULATION” – SIR JOHN BELLThese psychopathic eugenicists can’t help themselves — the cat’s out of the bag.
Watch the video on BitChute…its unbelievable !
Think about this from an evolutionary perspective. Fighting an infection and growing a baby both put major demands on available energy. Humans evolved when energy, in the form of food, was far more scarce than it is today. It stands to reason that, if a woman is expending a large amount of energy fighting off an infection her body may reject any recently acquired foetus to save energy to deal with the immediate threat (disease).