60% of Brits Fully Vaccinated Against Covid
More than 60% of U.K. adults have been given two doses of a Covid vaccine, but the Government’s view is that this isn’t enough to justify the easing of lockdown restrictions. The Prime Minister hopes that two-thirds of the adult population will be fully vaccinated by July 19th, creating a “wall of immunity“. Even then, he warns that “a proportion of the elderly and vulnerable may still succumb [to the virus] even if they have had two jabs”. The MailOnline has more on the latest milestone reached in the national vaccine roll-out.
More than 31.7 million over-18s have already had both doses, while 43.4 million – or 82.5% – have had their first jab, official statistics show.
Health Secretary Matt Hancock hailed the figures, claiming the U.K. was now “so close to ensuring the entire adult population is protected”.
Number 10’s Vaccine Chief Nadhim Zahawi – who will likely brag about the achievement at a 5pm Downing Street press conference tonight – hailed the “extraordinary feat”.
Ministers have once again urged Brits to come forward for their vaccines, with the roll-out now on the final phase with all over-18s able to book an appointment.
Mr Zahawi said getting two doses was “absolutely vital” because of the rapid spread of the Indian variant, adding: “I urge everyone eligible to get their jab and help us get back to normality.” …
Number 10 has now pledged to offer a first dose of a jab to all over-18s by the new “terminus day” of July 19th, and have a separate goal of fully vaccinating two-thirds of adults by the same date.
Although the target is not a pre-requisite of easing lockdown, the Prime Minister stressed the urgent need to jab as many people as possible to finally end restrictions.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
’66 million fecking idiots and me’ is a track on my new album
why would I have a novel vaccine with no long term safety data which fails to protect me from a cold?
I’d rather just have the cold. I’ve had colds before. They are literally nothing to worry about.
If I had one foot in the grave and the other on a banana skin then maybe its worse than a cold – but who fucking cares! You’ve only got months anyway. Got to die of something
Unfortunately.. they need our compassion.. despite dragging us along with them.
Some of them are going to die.
Pretty sure I already had it. It was a bad cold with a nasty and prolonged cough but like most people I survived. Strange that.
So glad to see that government and MSM acknowledge that “fully vaccinated” does not mean !00% no risk of infection or testing + for Sars-2, or even dying of natural causes!!
But they NEVER acknowledge that naturally-acquired immunity after recovery from covid DOES mean no further risk of infection. Because still the fools get vaccinated even though they’ve had it, like Boris, like my MP, for whom the side effects were worse than the virus.
“More than 60% of U.K. adults have been given two doses of a Covid vaccine”
can’t decide if they are brave or cowards
Just brainwashed and dazzled by media propaganda tricks for the brainwashed.
When you think about it – it’s not surprising. Commerce isn’t going to spend all that loot on all that advertising for idiots that seeps out of the box if there weren’t innumerable suckers influenced by it.
I think most are just desperate to get back to normal – after sixteen months of government restrictions and endless misleading propaganda people have become weary and desperate and desperate people will not only believe anything but they will also do anything too in return for some normality once again – like the battered housewife who has suffered endless abuse from her husband – she is willing to do anything to get back to how things used to be before the abuse began.
I don’t believe anything this government says.
My starting point for any statement from a government spokesman is that they are lying.
Next I invert the statement and re-examine and usually the truth is laid bare.
This is precisely the attitude one should have about every government everywhere.
I have to be locked down because someone who might want a jab I do not want, to protect them, hasn’t been offered theirs yet? Who comes up with this shit. Stay under the bed if you’re that scared.
I think they do. My life-long best friend, who has broken our friendship with shocking abuse because I won’t have a vaccine (even though I told her I’ve had covid and am immune she called me a f***ing moron) is too scared to leave her house. She now spends her days making cloth dolls. So far she’s made 24 and running out of space to put them. I am seriously afraid for her sanity.
I told her, as a final flourish, that I don’t wear a mask either.I can only guess her reaction to that.
“Mr Zahawi said getting two doses was “absolutely vital” because of the rapid spread of the Indian variant”
Talk about making up utterly meaningless shit!
Yep, they just talk nonsense. The latest is the Delta Plus variant, which sounds like a new phone from Samsung or something.
Immunity?
Immunity?
Yerwhat?
Really.
What’s the point of vaxxing when you still catch the disease, can still transfer it, and youll need booster shots evey year?
Im quite happy with my natural immunity thanks.
https://www.foxnews.com/health/4000-fully-vaccinated-tested-positive-virus-massachusetts
amazing how the same PR words are used worldwide “fully vaccinated” here
Asking that question means that you are in the group of people with an IQ above 50, which sadly only makes up about 5 % of the British and European populations now, though less among Millennials and Zs.
“60% of British people may have had an injection purporting to be a vaccine”
How much protection do they have against being infected by SARS-COV-2?
Not much. By the manufacturers’ own admission.
On the other hand, I have had the best possible protection against future infection by SARS-COV-2.
I was infected with it and recovered – within a week.
Just as the Chief Medical Officer said, last March, that the overwhelming majority of people would.
What happened to change your mind, Mr Whitty? Why all the doom and gloom and the fear campaign and the psychological warfare on the population and the desperation that the pandemic should continue and the determination that everyone must be vaccinated?
Did somebody with a lot of power and influence, have a word with you?
Double Jabbed is not “Fully” anything.
60% of “Brits” extremely likely to get “rare” side effects.
I am sick and tired of hearing that repugnant word ‘jab’. Sick, sick, sick!
Of course, it cannot be called vaccine either but jab? FGS.
Me too- innoculation, vaccination but not effing jab -that’s what happens in boxing
Not a jab (I hate that word too, very patronising), not a vaccination, but an experimental injection – and always will be experimental because the clinical trials have been spoilt by being unblinded and the control group being offered the experimental injection.
I may switch to calling it a stab then.
There are far worse words used on this site to describe Pfeffel and co., and on a regular basis without complaint.
Benefits of mass vaccination: basically none, since we know the disease is not a major threat
On the costs of mass vaccination, three broad possibilities:
1 The conspiracists are right and the vaccine has some deadly nefarious content. Result, mass death or infertility or some such.
2 The cockupists are right and the vaccines are relatively normal vaccines, in other words they negatively affect a small proportion of those who take them, some seriously. Result, we spend the next years or decades watching for and dealing with negative consequences in the vast numbers injected, and paying for the immense costs of the vaccination program.
3 The cockupists are right and one or more of the vaccines has some unforeseen catastrophic health impact on significant numbers of people and we spend the next few yeas or decades dealing with that, as well as the massive costs of the vaccination campaign.
So no benefits, and a choice of huge cost scenarios.
Three cheers for technocratic rule!
The evidence so far points to something between 2 and 3 – much less safe than many currently common vaccines, but perhaps not quite as bad as (3) – though it depends on you definition of “significant”. The problem is the long term safety is unknown.
Other possible costs: Driving the evolution of more dangerous strains/variants, covering the lies up, establishing the idea that quickly developed vaccines are the answer to everything, and must be imposed
That’s exactly how I see it at the moment.
Yep – That’s roughly how I see it – but probably nearer 3 than 2 in my view. What has happened is textbook major, preventable, disaster. Take your pick – Chernobyl, Bophal, Piper Alpha, Gulf of Mexico, Herald of Free Enterprise, Ladbrook Grove, B737 MAX …. the list is endless. All have common themes. Things being rushed, existing procedures ignored / subverted, those that should have been ensuring quality side-lined or turning a blind eye, commercial / political pressure, warnings ignored, those that try to speak out silenced – and finally at the end of it all, coverup. If you want confirmation that things will go wrong just read any of the books on safety management by James Reason and think about what has been done over the last 18 months. The only questions are the scale of the damage – and who (if anyone) will eventually be held accountable.
This is excellent point. You should make it into a longer essay and submit to Toby for publication!
Nice summary
Organisational culture and human behaviour will feature heavily in the analysis. Group think will be shown to play a huge part in the failure to mitigate the worst harms in the entire shameful episode.
The culture in organisations that actively prevents critical independent thought must be rooted out. NHS, universities, and government inspectorates and agencies are all culpable: their leaders need jail time.
The problem is the quality of what you call “the evidence so far”. If they cannot be trusted on treatments – banning Ivermectin etc – on PCR testing – on death certification – why would you trust their evaluation on safety? When the Oxford Professor of Evidence Based Medicine was attacked from the very start? When falsified studies have appeared in the Lancet? When Yeadon reports that expert immunologists are too worried for their livelihoods to talk about the known facts of the immune system? We have had a gp here saying there is pressure in the NHS felt by junior colleagues not to report possible effects to the Yellow Card system. We know Imperial runs the Pfizer Yellow Card system. We see US reports from parents of boys with heart attacks that it was extremely difficult to get anything to VAERS. We now those systems only capture a small percentage of effects. And we have very senior scientists, including Robert Malone, issuing very serious warnings – and those warnings are almost only being given by those who are independent through retirement or financial success. It’s a 1. Those selling the stabs are ruthlessly disregarding risk and death. They want… Read more »
Active subversion of the safety process in any other industry would result in very serious consequences, perhaps because the end accident is accompanied by an unmissable loud bang, smoke, flame, bodies and debris everywhere. The concealment, obsfuscation and outright lies demonstrated within the medical and pharmaceutical industry is breathtaking, compounded by cultural arrogance that their victims are unimportant and too stupid to notice the harms done to them.
Only 1 makes sense: this disease simply isn’t sufficiently dangerous to require the injection of the vast majority of the population with experimental gene therapies.
Why should we assume there is any connection between the severity of the disease and the government desire to jab everyone?
We must judge government actions as purely political – the connection to actual public health benefits is nominal
So you believe that the “vaccines” are not intentionally harmful but only harmful because they’ve been rushed?
Or am I misunderstanding you?
Why do you believe they’re so determined to inject us all?
How do you rationalise the deliberate and blatant suppression of safe and effective licenced tried and tested off patent drugs and Vitamin D in favour of coercing an entire population of otherwise healthy people who were never at risk from Covid19 any more than they were at risk from influenza into injecting high risk experimental gene based treatments which do not work?
Don’t let them off the hook by implying they are incompetent and didn’t/don’t know what they were doing. These are deliberate, clear-cut crimes. They downgraded the severity level of Covid19 on 19th March 2020 and THEN locked down. They loosened up the laws on how death registration was processed to facilitate death certificate FORGERY. They invented TRANSPARENTLY FRAUDULENT methods of counting Covid deaths in order to hijack the souls of the dead and weaponise their death AGAINST those they left behind by using deceit to ramp up the death toll which is pure evil. They ran 24/7 hardcore PROPAGANDA campaigns which are still ongoing for a virus no more deadly than a bad flu, even if you believe all their BS. They made people wear masks when they KNEW masks had no effect after decades of research into their effectiveness at preventing airborne viruses – mask wearing (especially the horrible cheap material ones which most are wearing) can lead to numerous bad health outcomes. They hard sold the idea of asymptomatic transmission when they KNEW it was a falsehood – to make people feel like they are murderers simply for breathing. They locked down again and again when they KNEW… Read more »
Brilliant summary.
Journalism is not dead, it’s just hiding
The truth
exactly they are ‘deliberate clear cut crimes’
I just wanted to add another
The installation of controlled opposition groups with big fat donate buttons (shall I name them?) whose purpose it is to subvert opposition by use of sophistry, time wasting, false hope and so on
It’s a new version of Russian roulette with all the barrels except one containing a bullet
?Assassinated African leaders?
Bravo. Very well written, and covered the essential points succinctly.
Sadly, doctors can’t do probability, see Sebastian Rushworth’s latest.
That’s one of the reasons why we are where we are.
“More than 60% of U.K. adults have been given two doses of a Covid vaccine“
Is this the right time to observe that even the WSJ is having to admit that there might be issues here:
Are Covid Vaccines Riskier Than Advertised?
I think we’ve reached the point where we should ask:
Should doctors be prescribing catching covid to protect against the vaccines?
For some categories of patients, it seems pretty clear the vaccines are more dangerous than the disease, especially newer variants that might be less virulent.
Stupid as it might seem to prescribe a disease to protect against a treatment supposedly aimed at preventing the disease, one could foresee a potential situation in which proof of either vaccination or prior infection is required for some activity.
Thus does madness beget madness.
We had to catch the infection to avoid the infection.
“proof of either vaccination or prior infection is required for some activity” Im afraid this is already the case here in Austria for almost any activity.
The related issue is that they are not interested in trying to find out whether someone is already immune on account of having dealt with it normally. Logically, they could take a blood sample first, before offering the new drug, but when I offered that, there was no reply; a blind eye job to questions like that. One could shell out a few hundred quid to have it done, though.
This could be challenged in the courts I think – proof of T cells and antibodies having to give at least the same privilege as the stabs.
But the requirement itself is the great evil here, and it will be spread. TB, anyone?
With Ivermectin etc. But manmade Covid 19 is also an evil thing.
While fear of the virus is part of the reason for the jab uptake I suspect that for the vast majority of those vaccinated the biggest reason of all for having the jab is because they have been promised back their freedoms in return.
They are going to be so very disappointed.
Anecdotal evidence keeps telling me you’re spot on.
Close confidante of my wife told her as much yesterday. A highly intelligent and brilliant woman. That she would surrender her bodily autonomy for vague promises from this criminal government is absolutely heinous.
It could turn out worse than mere disappointment when the seasonal viruses kick in for those who have been ‘vaccinated’. I have sleepless nights worrying about my family.
Robert Malone says there is “no signal” on the ferret problem affecting humans – currently. If that helps.
It will just be one more thing in a very long list that the UK public has been happy to accept…three weeks to flatten the curve…sorry, Christmas is cancelled…21st June, let’s try 19th July… Sadly, they will just never waken up.
They have no intention of letting us get back to normality. These evil psychopaths need locking up for good!
Fully expecting the knocks at the door to start soon.
Everyone needs a hill to die on and this will be mine if they try it.
Yes, that phrase has been on my mind. I don’t think I fully realised the significance before, but this is it.⁰
will keep a bucket of water ready, whoops sorry just finished doing the floor
Love it!
No, not for a year or so: not enough people to do the knocking.
From Autumn onwards we can expect to be blamed for the continuation of lockdown and our friends and neighbours to be encouraged to shame us into submission.
Hope people realise they will NEVER be FULLY vaccinated, this is big business, Two is not Enough
Yes it’s a subscription model
Strong fish swim against the tide. Dead fish float with it.
“He warns that “a proportion of the elderly and vulnerable may still succumb [to the virus] even if they have had two jabs””
None of your business.
Neither if anyone unjabbed succumbs.
Presumably Ferguson or TLSHTM have modelled this and have an idea of the expected mortality rate.
I wonder why they haven’t published this because I am sure it would be suitably frightening.
I believe zero that comes from any Government ministers gob.
60% of Brits Fully Vaccinated Against Covid
I’m sorry, Mr Curzon, but they’ve been ‘fully vaccinated’ against precisely nothing. We keep telling them: your vax doesn’t stop you getting it and doesn’t stop you spreading it.
I’m looking forward to the ‘superspreader’ events where only the vaxxed have attended. That’ll wake up the poor sods.
there won’t be any superspreader events because that is another myth. It’s all a pack of lies.
If you wanted to perpetuate the myth that asymptomatic illness/transmission existed though, there’s not much better way than giving people a “vaccine” that only reduces severity of symptoms and then letting only those people mingle.
I firmly believe now that the “asymptomatic” element of covid that has been falsely perpetuated by China is by far its most important feature. Without it, everything else falls away.
Ooh – Terminus Day July 19th, he says.
What can we do to celebrate?
Bake a cake?
“Terminus “day, or “Terminal”? The gullibility of the “Great” British public leaves me speechless…
Utterly amazed and more than a little disappointed that one of my sons at the ripe old age of 29 couldn’t wait to get jabbed. What on Earth he thinks he has to worry about is beyond me. I’m twice his age and stopped worrying about this the moment I realised what it actually was, yet here we have a fairly fit, intelligent young man who is worried enough to take the risk of having an unproven treatment for something that poses next to no risk to him. Luckily his brother, who is a couple of years older, told them that he is currently ‘too busy’ when offered a date for a jab.
They do know about the heart inflammation problems, especially in young men and boys, the younger the more, that they are clearly linked to Pfizer, and that they are showing up way above the usual level, that the missionaries preaching their glorious effects and profiting from them are either in control of the assessment of their dangers – Israel, Britain – or heavily influencing those assessing?
And that though the CDC dismisses myocarditis as minor, there have been deaths? And that other doctors are pointing to potential heart problems in future?
They have got that?
“Fully” is just another word they are attempting to redefine. What do they mean? Fully of shit? Even if it more or less meets the requirement, it will not 100% prevent infection and/or related illness, and if you do use it, you do so at your own risk.
I think the word they’re really trying to redefine is “vaccinated”. Try replacing with “controlled”, “duped” or “compliant”, andthe word “fully” makes much more sense.
This is the age of Aquarius…
Well bully for the 60+ million. There’s going to be a lot of empty houses.
Let’s hope not.
Does Julie Fartley Brewer look well to you since her two jabs?
The Prime Minister is desperate for money, Princess Nutnuts is desperate to turn the world Green, Hancock is desperate to depopulate, Gove is just desperate.
The rest of Parliament just want to remain at home on full pay. The Globalists have yet again mismanaged the world economies and the money is running out. All they see is depopulation and transfer of wealth to themselves to save their own lifestyles. But what happens when the world only has 500,000 people living, no manufacturing or entrepreneurs, just pseudo scientists and greedy Banking families??. What do they do then when the rest of us are dead, and that includes the politicians, journalists, academics and financiers who all thought they would be saved. The unintended consequences of sitting back and watching the strong march of the Globalists walk all over you is no longer an option. The unintended consequences of the Globalists drive towards technocracy will wipe out the human race.
Stanley J also pulls strings.. he, Carrie and Kier are all connected to the Rockerfeller Foundation.
And this would once have sounded like unrestrained madness. But actually David Icke clearly has a better grasp of events than Hancock.