Plans for “Booster” Covid Vaccine Roll-Out Coming Within Weeks

Health Secretary Matt Hancock says that plans for a “booster” Covid vaccine roll-out in the autumn will be set out in the coming weeks. BBC News has the story.

The Health Secretary said ministers were waiting for results from trials of different combinations of vaccines.

It comes after doctors and NHS trusts said planning for a booster rollout must start now as it will involve bigger challenges. 

They said many questions needed answering, including how long immunity from the original Covid jab lasts.

The issue of whether children will be vaccinated also still remains, health leaders said.

“We are currently trialling which combinations of jabs are the most effective,” Mr Hancock told BBC Breakfast. 

“In the next few weeks, when we get the clinical data through on what’s the most effective combinations to have… then we’ll set out all the details for the booster programme for the autumn.”

Among the ongoing trials is the U.K.’s Cov-Boost trial, which is testing different combinations of third doses across England. 

A senior Government source said the U.K. would also benefit from new vaccines from Novavax and Valneva, which are awaiting approval from the U.K.’s medicines regulator. 

So far, nearly 60% of U.K. adults have had two jabs of the vaccine, meaning they are fully vaccinated, and more than four in five adults have had their first dose.

People have been rushing to get their vaccines in recent days, with more than one million jabs booked on Friday and Saturday in England after vaccinations opened to all over-18s.

Worth reading in full.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

82 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
masksniffer22
4 years ago

I could do with a boost myself. 😕

Julian
4 years ago

Notice that there is no reason given for why boosters are needed
Is it variants?
Does the efficacy fade?
Have they done studies?
No one is asking
All just theatre
The idea of boosters was introduced a while back, now it is cemented in and accepted

RickH
4 years ago
Reply to  Julian

Another example of the frog boiling process.

Any objective look at the need for ‘boosters’ at this juncture would conclude ‘What the f.? These ‘vaccines’ must be totally useless’.

dismalswamp
4 years ago
Reply to  Julian

Because it’s not a true vaccine, it just changes how host cells behave when they become infected, stopping the disease. You still get covid, can still infect others, but once you had covid and gotten better, you then have true immunity and wouldn’t actually need any kind of booster ever again.

Julian
4 years ago
Reply to  dismalswamp

Quite possibly, but the “boost” required in truth is to the govts ability to control us, access to easy power, given by perpetuating the narrative. Nothing to do with health.

chris c
chris c
4 years ago
Reply to  dismalswamp

That’s not very profitable though

HelenaHancart
HelenaHancart
4 years ago
Reply to  Julian

But they’ll all be wanting it, and queuing up for it with their sleeves rolled up, forever, and ever, and ever, and ever…

I am Spartacas
4 years ago

E4VK5v7VcAovwAo.jpg
RickH
4 years ago
Reply to  I am Spartacas

That’s a good summary.

J4mes
4 years ago
Reply to  I am Spartacas

Ordinarily it would make me laugh being called a tin-hat wearing conspiracy theory loon by someone wearing a perspex screen over their face while insisting we follow the arrows on the floor and wringing their hands with sanitiser every ten minutes… but it doesn’t make me laugh.

I am Spartacas
4 years ago

..

E4Po492XEAEy6h5.jpg
unmaskthetruth
4 years ago
Reply to  I am Spartacas

Needs a ‘digital ID app’ squeezed in there somehow. Once connected with facial recognition there will be no need for actual lockdown’s just ever changing digital ones…

Hester
Hester
4 years ago

stop calling it a jab its so infantile

RickH
4 years ago
Reply to  Hester

I think it comes from an attempt to undermine the inaccurate label ‘vaccine’.

J4mes
4 years ago
Reply to  Hester

OK, let’s settle on calling it poison.

CovidiousAlbion
4 years ago
Reply to  J4mes

“However, poison can also refer to normal medicines in Australian law.” (https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-vaccine-australia-idUSL1N2MY0M6)

DanClarke
DanClarke
4 years ago
Reply to  Hester

Gene Therapy?

Cecil B
Cecil B
4 years ago
Reply to  DanClarke

I prefer Monkey Gunk

TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
4 years ago
Reply to  Hester

Clotting Agent?

sophie123
4 years ago

Spike protein generator injection

iane
iane
4 years ago
Reply to  Hester

Andrew Lloyd Jabber would disagree! [Mind you, he is pretty disagreeable.]

ellie-em
4 years ago
Reply to  Hester

I prefer shite in a syringe.

scuzbert
scuzbert
4 years ago
Reply to  Hester

I refuse to call it vaccination, and injection or inoculation sounds sounds medically conventional.

RickH
4 years ago

The ‘variants’ plus this will be the gift that keeps on giving – as we predicted.

JayBee
4 years ago

Ridiculous piece of propaganda and advocation of unethical, criminal medical experiments.
As for Valneva, it just finished the ‘completion of recruitment for phase 3 trial’.
Neither its nor Novavax’s (whose product I am no longer interested in) potions are with the regulators currently.
https://valneva.com/press-release/valneva-completes-phase-3-trial-recruitment-for-its-inactivated-covid-19-vaccine-candidate/

peyrole
peyrole
4 years ago
Reply to  JayBee

Agree that timescales are silly, and obviously real tests cannot be completed in the timescales talked about. However Valneva is at least interesting that it is fairly conventional using inactivated whole virus, so a lot of the concerns about the spike etc should not be present. My question is , does this mean there is a live whole virus in a lab in Livingston or elsewhere in the possession of Valeneva, because how else can they do this? If so why doesn’t anyone else have it?

arfurmo
arfurmo
4 years ago
Reply to  JayBee

What’s put you off Novavax, please?

TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
4 years ago

Vaccines don’t work, have another vaccination.

DanClarke
DanClarke
4 years ago

So people are going to be stuffed full of experimental vaccines while they are still collecting yellow cards. Unbelievable!

Winston Smith
4 years ago

Is he on commission?

unmaskthetruth
4 years ago
Reply to  Winston Smith

Much more than commission.

TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
4 years ago

Completely off topic…

Smart phones are to phones what smart “meters” are to meters

https://techxplore.com/news/2021-06-texas-power-companies-adjusting-residents.html

Some owners of smart thermostats in the Lone Star State found their pre-set temperatures were going up, all done remotely by their power company, according to local reports. It wasn’t devious: The adjustments are being made as part of programs aimed at saving energy and reducing strain on the power grid.

Say what? Sounds like Texas has a corporate computer misuse problem.

A Heretic
A Heretic
4 years ago

The adjustments are being made as part of programs aimed at saving energy and reducing strain on the power grid.

Which they wouldn’t need to do if they hadn’t replaced their working generators with religious icons windmills.

peyrole
peyrole
4 years ago
Reply to  A Heretic

Yes, temp increases in Air Con settings to reduce demand. At times of peak over the last few days the output from wind generation has been negligible . As ERCOT, the Texas power system is almost an island system there have been spreading power cuts as there is just not enough generation to meet demand. Its estimated that of $60Bn spent on wind/solar generation in that last decade, $20bn has been subsidies. But no conventional plant built so now TSHTF.

TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
4 years ago
Reply to  peyrole

Those subsidies accrue to the land owner the wind-totem is placed on.

Greenism is the new part of the stealthy welfare state for the establishment.

dismalswamp
4 years ago

He can ram his booster. Sideways.

steve_w
4 years ago

This is just what the pharma companies want. A populace so scared that they are happy for vaccines to forgo the testing stage. More vaccines, rushed out for anything they can think of, no need for testing. They’ll look at the 200 colds going round normally, pick one and make it into a casedemic. Another vaccine.

There’s huge pressure to emergency license malaria vaccines. After all, if for covid then why not for anything else. Pharma companies hate testing. Its 10 years they aren’t making any money

It will end in tears

RickH
4 years ago
Reply to  steve_w

That’s a sound analysis – think of the massive increase in profit margins that accrue from (a) ditching proper testing and then (b) producing snake oil at whim for artificial crises.

Paul B
4 years ago

I’m sure this has no legs but if you are so inclined, please sign my petition to allow an opt out from the NHS. Along with opting out of care I’d also like to be able to opt out of paying for it.

Apparently it needs 5 signatures to go live and 21 before they review it manually and allow more signatures. If I get 21 I’ll be amazed as I have no social media or following to speak of, but still. I have to do something before I accept the new ‘yellow star’ care level that I’ll no doubt still be forced to pay for.

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/589407/sponsors/new?token=KYdowbr8k0umDB2xjPOh

Apache
Apache
4 years ago
Reply to  Paul B

Done

BJJ
BJJ
4 years ago
Reply to  Paul B

Done

Billy Suggers
Billy Suggers
4 years ago
Reply to  Paul B

Done

RickH
4 years ago
Reply to  Paul B

Your error is in thinking private health care is any different.

Paul B
4 years ago
Reply to  RickH

They probably want my money…

TreeHugger
4 years ago
Reply to  Paul B

Done

Paul B
4 years ago
Reply to  TreeHugger

Thanks all, being reviewed 🙂

scuzbert
scuzbert
4 years ago
Reply to  Paul B

Done. Good luck!

I am Spartacas
4 years ago

Another opportunity to play Russian Roulette with your life …

E35k1ahX0AI1UxW.jpg
I am Spartacas
4 years ago

Absolutely correct …

yeadon2.jpg
Brett_McS
4 years ago

“The vaccines are relatively benign, to get everyone used to ‘the jab’. The boosters will be where the real serious stuff is”. That’s a sentiment that is shared by many of the top skeptics in the medical profession.

Mayo
Mayo
4 years ago
Reply to  Brett_McS

Which “top skeptics”?

The only ones I hear on the sceptic side who are predicting mass genocide are the likes of Dolores Cahill, Sheri Tenpenny et al. Their claims are not credible. I’m not denying that there are an unacceptable number of vaccine injuries and there may be more to come but they will still be relatively rare.

iane
iane
4 years ago
Reply to  Mayo

“they will still be relatively rare.” Hiya, Mystic Mayo!

Mayo
Mayo
4 years ago
Reply to  iane

Yes. They are, and will continue to be, relatively rare. It’s obvious from the numbers taking up the vaccine that very few people are observing many serious side effects.

Annie
4 years ago
Reply to  Mayo

This is demonstrably true.
What we don’t know us whether or not ‘serious side effects’ will develop in the future.
What we also don’t know is whether or not the present low levels of ‘cases’ and covvicorpses have anything at all to do with the snake oil.

LMS2
4 years ago
Reply to  Mayo

They might be observing them, but they’re not recording them as adverse events because the vaccines are totally safe, so dropping dead 24 hours after being vaccinated is nothing to do with the vaccine. It’s just coincidence. Relatively healthy people in their thirties and forties drop dead every day. Or suffer massive blood clots. Nothing to see here.

sophie123
4 years ago
Reply to  Mayo

I don’t understand the downvotes. Mayo is right. Even if underreported by a factor of 10 (which the deaths may well be), it’s still relatively rare. That doesn’t mean it’s not an unacceptably high level of death relative to other vaccines, especially in the context of a disease that poses very little threat to younger, slimmer, healthier people. Other sceptics concerned about the boosters are Bhakdi, Yeadon and more. But they are slightly more measured in their tone. I think we need to avoid alarmist language or people will shut down, not listen and fail to act on what are legitimate concerns. “THEY’RE ALL GOING TO DIE!!!!” Is not credible or accurate. Booster mRNA jabs are going to be harmful, but still only to small numbers. Infertility may only impact a small percentage, but it’s horrible if you’re the one impacted. If your child is the one in whatever thousand that gets myocarditis or clots, knowing it’s rare won’t make you feel any better about the decision to get them injected. Some people might develop lymphomas, but not EVERYBODY. It’s the fact that it is likely to be a complete crap shoot that makes it easier for them to get… Read more »

swedenborg
4 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

Completely agree with you both. Most people will not have severe reactions. The absolute majority will not die of the vaccine. The problem is that the rare but serious and more frequent side effects recently in specific age groups.

This is not a safe enough vaccine for young and healthy especially as we also have no long term studies. However for patients with serious outcome of C 19,especially in elderly, this vaccine is on balance beneficial. If this experimental vaccine had been used in the specific risk groups and closely monitored for side effects, everything would be different.

It is the mad haste with mass vaccination of healthy young persons in a quixotic attempt to stop the pandemic which is the main problem with far too high vaccine injuries. The recent published evidence of treatment for C 19(below link) makes mass vaccination a failed strategy and much more dangerous incl. the risk of quickly developed vaccine resistant strain.

“Everybody is going to die argument” is most unhelpful in a serious attempt to correct the mass vaccination which was not even considered half a year ago.

https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/Abstract/9000/Ivermectin_for_Prevention_and_Treatment_of.98040.aspx

Monro
4 years ago
Reply to  Mayo

‘..they will still be relatively rare’

More likely to be under-reported.

A 92 year old in this household is now suffering from polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) occurring shortly after second pfizer dose.

Inevitably no mention by the NHS of the possible/likely connection, despite annual influenza vaccinations triggering PMR on a regular basis; the link between vaccines and PMR side effects are well known.

https://www.journalmc.org/index.php/JMC/article/view/2788/2121

Mayo
Mayo
4 years ago
Reply to  Monro

If they weren’t ‘relatively rare’ then there would be far more resistance to the vaccine. I’ve been in touch with dozens of people recently who have had the vaccine and have had virtually no side effects. That also goes for their family members, friends and work colleagues.

Annie
4 years ago
Reply to  Mayo

Correct.
For heaven’s sake, folks, do you want everybody apart from us sceptics to die in agony? The way you talk, that’s the impression I sometimes get.

Monro
4 years ago
Reply to  Mayo

The 92 year old in question has never even considered that there might be any connection.

She has lived her entire life with complete confidence in the NHS.

She is a great deal more typical of the nation in general than we are on this site.

That largely explains the predicament in which we find ourselves.

But it also means that, once again, the data, in this case regarding vaccine side effects, is likely to be of very poor quality……

B.F.Finlayson
4 years ago

VACCINE MAMBO No.5

Jump up and down and move it all around
Shake your head to the sound, put your hand on the ground
Take one step left and one step right
One to the front and one to the side
Clap your hand once and clap your hands twice
Roll up your sleeve like this then you’re doing it right….

A little bit of Moderna in my life, a little bit of SinoVac by my side
A little bit of Janssen is all I need, a little bit of Pfizer is what I see
A little bit of Sputnik in the sun, a little bit of EpiVac all night long
A little Astra Zeneca here I am, a little bit of Vaxx makes me your man (Ha!)

(repeat ad nauseum)

PerezPrado.jpg
FarligGods
4 years ago

If the body doesn’t remember convid and remain immune for a long duration, then it’s not a serious threat. The body’s immune system is not stupid, it’s been honed through millions of years of evolution to survive…

It’s becoming just too easy to see what the real intentions are here… When will the sheeple wake up & realise they’ve all been duped?

iane
iane
4 years ago
Reply to  FarligGods

Hmmmm, never?

MickW
4 years ago

One word – Ivermectin

OMatt
OMatt
4 years ago

Good God, it’s painful reading the comments under a BBC article such as this. First time I’ve done it since COVID. I suppose my hopes should not have been high.

I especially loved the smug “Darwin was right, and the unvacinated will all be dead soon enough”.

Hmm well, half-right maybe.

Annie
4 years ago
Reply to  OMatt

I’ll take a bet on it. If I I live, they lose. If I die, I won’t be caring whether they lose or not.

Nessimmersion
4 years ago

.

130708346_505759690465542_2981769660984963373_n.jpg
I am Spartacas
4 years ago

Reminder …

E2a63OwXwAQb0Kq.jpg
RickH
4 years ago
Reply to  I am Spartacas

One of the ‘interesting’ phenomena is how often the Covmaniacs can be totally wrong, and still perceived as ‘SAGE’!

… whilst the rational can be consistently right, and the reverse applies.

Hopeful
Hopeful
4 years ago

I heard a respected medic/scientist state recently that the whole covid thing is about the vaccines. These first lot are the test for ‘them’ to see how many get harmed and how many die. He reckons that the boosters will be the real killers. Push duly explained.

Mayo
Mayo
4 years ago
Reply to  Hopeful

Which “respected medic/scientist”?

Burlington
4 years ago

If this government recommended 10ml of cat shit in a glass of water per day 75% of the fuckwits would try it.
Thinking about it, cat shit may be more beneficial for stimulating the immune system than the “vaccine.”

Who wouldn’t pay good money to see Hancock try that on GMTV administered by Dr Hillarity.

helenf
4 years ago

This booster programme will be even more experimental than the original “vaccine” programme. Trials have only just started, yet they’re talking about an autumn rollout. WAKE UP PEOPLE – you are nothing more than lab rats! The Nazis would be well impressed.

Annie
4 years ago

Rushing for jabs.
Long queues.
Production line.
Fully informed?

lutherkehrt@gmail.com
lutherkehrt@gmail.com
4 years ago

I believe the manufacturers of one awaited vaccine are not ‘valvena’ but ‘Valverna’. In fact it is an old fashioned, normal type vaccine. I’m wondering whether it’ll get permitted, given that fact.

huxleypiggles
4 years ago

“…how long immunity from the original (injection) lasts?”

There is NO immunity.

lutherkehrt@gmail.com
lutherkehrt@gmail.com
4 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Wonder what it does then. 😳

diego22
diego22
4 years ago

Since I have received no perceptible benefit from the first two jabs they can stick any subsequent ones up their @ss. No freedoms, no jabs, no compliance.