News Round-Up

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

26 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago

“Journalists take year and a half to consider lab-leak hypothesis”.

My issue with this is not about whether or not it is true, but why debate on the issue appears to be stifled, and why a scientific hypothesis has to be labelled “left wing” or “right wing” (incidentally outdated and increasingly irrelevant terms stemming from revolutionary France).

Incidentally, the CCP that is so keen to denounce this hypothesisis, it should be remembered, is the same CCP that hounded the Wuhan doctor who went public with his story about a dangerous new virus in 2019. The problem, of course, is that there is far too much politics mixed up with science. I suppose it is too much to expect the msm to place more value on genuinely independent scientific sources.

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago

“Britons face scramble to beat restrictions”. Heard this somewhere before. Groundhog day? So much for the sodding vaccines!

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago

“Ford government to allow ‘brief hugs’ at care homes”..

Who the hell do they think they are? And how have a raft of restrictions which simultaneously amount to an abuse of the elderly and a sacrificing of children’s lives become acceptable? Dark, worrying times, even if it ended tomorrow.

Brett_McS
4 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

A pure power play. The whole Covid debacle has been an insight into how many people live for them.

HelenaHancart
HelenaHancart
4 years ago

And so it goes on…they’re going to pull the same sort of stunt they did at Christmas, and they’re going keep on doing it for as long as they can keep pulling “variants” out of their arses, and convincing the brainwashed public to be afraid, very afraid, for ever, and ever…damn each and every disgusting one of them!

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago
Reply to  HelenaHancart

Time for a revolution?

Brett_McS
4 years ago

The “Ivermectin obliterates 97% of Dehli cases” article is excellent. As is one of the (two) comments to the article: This was not just an Ivermectin trial, it was an Ivermectin vs Remdesivir trial. The expensive Remdesivir pushed by Fauci et al lost by a landslide.

Hugh
Hugh
4 years ago
Reply to  Brett_McS

Surely this on its own would be reason to end the restrictions now if the villains actually had any intention of doing so?

peyrole
peyrole
4 years ago
Reply to  Brett_McS

As a ‘trial’ across several states in India with thousands of real people over a month , it beats the ‘vaccine’ emergency use trials hands down.
All the states using Ivermectin show dramatic improvements; all the states not doing so show continuing increases.
I would add that a comprehensive independent study of the use of HCQ in Marseilles just out , shows similar results over 12 months.
There just is no argument with these results.
Inducing emergency use injections is wrong, fundamentally crosses every ethical boundary. And to link it to freedoms such as travel is evil personified.
Unfortunately as the article writer knows , no MSM coverage, so no one knows except a few like us.

Friedrich Stapß
4 years ago

First article – you could have mentioned that the WHO knows nothing about the “Nepali” variant, which appears to have been invented by MailOnline.

Second article – you could have mentioned that the vast, overwhelming majority of new cases are among people under 30, and that the whole thing is therefore a non-event.

But you didn’t. Shame on you for this obedient regurgitation. Focus instead on the increasingly bleeding obvious fact that unless there is organized, active resistance, they are never going to let this go. We are exactly where we were before Christmas. They are softening the people up for a summer lockdown. To save us from the winter lockdown, which they will soften us up for in October, when we’ve forgotten about the summer and seasonal cases (of whatever, who cares, as long as people are coughing a bit) are rising.

This cannot be opposed in the traditional polite, reasonable, consensual, democratic ways.

Annie
4 years ago

It’s all very well for you to say that. You aren’t here.
Back in the time of Bloody Mary, John Knox, from a safe haven in Geneva, exhorted his parishioners in England to stand firm and court martyrdom. Martyrdom isn’t so inviting when it’s you that is in line for burning at the stake.

Friedrich Stapß
4 years ago
Reply to  Annie

All right, then, Annie. I’ll leave you to it. It’s all a waste of breath anyway.

Annie
4 years ago

I’ve been on the big demo, I go unmasked, I demolish covvinotices, I am unvaxxed, I have anti-nappy slogans in my car back window, I distribute stickers. Not ready yet to storm the BBC.

RickH
4 years ago
Reply to  Annie

Yes. Fantasy isn’t a weapon when the imbalance is so great.

… and no, I don’t have any simple solutions, even when I know what isn’t.

Winston Smith
4 years ago
Reply to  Annie

And so the infighting begins……….

Julian
4 years ago

Well I share your pessimism but I’m not sure violent resistance is the answer. I know you haven’t actually directly advocated that, but it could be interpreted like that. I think resistance is organised and active, but generally peaceful. If it goes beyond that I think it would be clamped down on quite hard, but the main problem is that the majority of people would approve of that clamping down. Resistance of a more extreme kind tends to work best if it has the tacit support of a significant proportion of the population. I don’t think we are there. I think we are better off trying to persuade our fellow citizens. I think sooner or later the anti-lockdown movement will coalesce around a smaller number of poles and we may see some serious money put into an information campaign to start to combat the propaganda. But I don’t think this will be quick – it may take decades. My hope is that enough restrictions are eased over the summer that it makes it hard for them to be reintroduced as people will have tasted freedom, but it’s a very small hope and many aspects of the madness will remain.

thedarkhorse
4 years ago
Reply to  Julian

A lot of us don’t have decades to wait, Julian. I have no intention of spending my final fifteen to twenty years or so of life living in a permanent lockdown situation. Personally I don’t see it playing out this way, I think there is a huge economic storm about to break, and that in itself will be a major game-changer. People will have the choice of being terrified by covid or being terrified of no food on the table or money to pay the bills. As for the violence, that’s already happening, albeit over other issues.

Julian
4 years ago
Reply to  thedarkhorse

Maybe. I’m not especially young myself and obviously not looking forward to the dystopia being created, but I think it’s quite possible that this nonsense can be dragged on sustainably for a long while – they’ve been quite canny at that, easing off when they needed to then clamping down again.

While we’re in a minority, violence will damage, not help, our cause – that’s my view, anyway. Mass, organised civil disobedience might have more success – for example, going en masse into shops etc without masks, because others might be emboldened, but the danger is that the anti-lockdown movement will start to look threatening to those in power, and they will clamp down harder – right now I don’t think they are too worried as they are so much in control.

Moist Von Lipwig
4 years ago

Nepal scariant? It originated from the great fat communist arse of Kim Jong Johnson.

SilentP
SilentP
4 years ago

Vaccine Injuries – Where to find hard evidence of the numbers?

Dr Malcolm Kendrick’s latest article highlights the frightening potential for the ‘vaccines’ to cause many serious injuries and deaths.

There are also reports from several sources indicating the scale of the problems being experienced by hospitals.

Although it may be difficult to distinguish some of the vaccine induced injuries from those that have occurred for other reasons, one would expect there to have been noticeable sharp spikes in certain areas.

For example, a comment yesterday stated that stroke hospitalisations were running at unprecedented levels.

Surely some of this information is publicly available. Where can it be found?

Annie
4 years ago
Reply to  SilentP

SilentP, are you related to Psmith?

SilentP
SilentP
4 years ago
Reply to  Annie

Only by our initials!
My username gives a clue to my real name but it’s a bit obscure

Paul B
4 years ago

Have the emergency powers been extended another 6 months yet? Furlough till February anyone?

Milos
4 years ago

It’s important to get to the bottom of the story of how the virus originated. This topic also shows that concept of “scientific consensus” can be abused (like when they claimed in the Nature that the consensus is that the virus didn’t come from the lab). Btw, as it is obvious now, it was not even consensus, it was an interest group of few scientists. That China/CCP is not to be trusted and are capable of horrible things is nothing new, just look at its 20 century history and more recently at what they are doing in Xinjiang and Hong Kong. But much more important is the question of overhyping the danger of the virus and promoting lockdowns. Here’s another good article from Jordan S. on this topic. I’ll just quote some parts. https://dossier.substack.com/p/what-to-make-of-the-covid-19-lab ” The COVID-19 lab leak theory, or the idea that the virus escaped from a Chinese lab in Wuhan (instead of China’s claim that it was a pathogen spillover event that arose from a wet market), seems to be the prominent discussion topic surrounding the pandemic in the corporate press these days. While the lab leak theory is definitely an important topic, it’s still secondary to… Read more »

chris c
chris c
4 years ago
Reply to  Milos

Yes good points!

The virus seems to have been circulating in various parts of the world BEFORE the lab leak was supposed to occur. I wonder if it was imported into the lab “for research” and then escaped.

Whatever, it was marketed by the CCP as the most lethal and contagious virus ever known to man when it obviously wasn’t. All else stems from this.

paul smith
4 years ago

Apropos of nothing (or, possibly, everything), vis-a-vis the Fauci Affair, I give you a loud-mouthed metal-head’s* take:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4Wn8PyH7N0

*Albeit, a very astute loud-mouthed metal-head.