News Round Up

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

24 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
nickbowes
nickbowes
4 years ago

Our “wonderful” bbc not bothering yesterday to mention the vast anti lockdown march yet deemed it worthwhile to mention the Palestinian march in London instead. It is time to enter the bbc and drain the poison from our screens.

Milo
Milo
4 years ago
Reply to  nickbowes

thank you for posting that – if you hadn’t I wouldn’t have known that the march took place – not according to the BBC, or Sky or ITN

Winston Smith
4 years ago

That’s the best comment I’ve read on here for a long time 👍🏻

Adamb
4 years ago

Oh, baby, can’t do this to me, baby,
Just gotta get out, just gotta get right outta here

Lucan Grey
4 years ago

Question.

If lockdown works and inbound quarantine works, how did the Indian Variant get here?

Yet all the talk is why didn’t we ban travel sooner…

eastender53
4 years ago
Reply to  Lucan Grey

My apologies if your question was satirical. If by chance it wasn’t I’ll take the liberty of explaining. Variants are named after the country or region where they were first identified. There is no scientific evidence that proves they are unique to that region or even originated there. As viruses mutate it is statistically likely that similar mutations will occur in more than one region. It is impossible to prove that this particular variant originated in India or indeed was imported from India. It merely suits the narrative of those wishing to keep us subservient forever. Note no ‘official’ information is released detailing how different this variant is. They prefer to use ‘mights’ and ‘coulds’ to scare people without having any ultimate accountability when it all proves a damp squib. SARS Ccv 1 was 20% different to its newer cousin yet the latter is recognised and dealt with via T cell immunity from the original SARS. The newer variants are apparently in the region of 0.3% different. Basic virology and immunology would say that is clinically identical.

Winston Smith
4 years ago
Reply to  eastender53

Discussion of variants or anything else is distraction and/or obfuscation.

These lengthy debates about the statistics of ……. well, anything really, are pointless other that the self-gratification of the writer.

The measures are justified by a meaningless ‘test’, the government knows that, the debate is now how to get out of this mess.

eastender53
4 years ago
Reply to  Winston Smith

Obviously you’ve never been involved in a war. Defeat the enemy in detail and his structure collapses. The test is indeed meaningless. The proof that it is so has been established by……science. I trust you obtained more self gratification from your post than I, which was none.

Winston Smith
4 years ago
Reply to  eastender53

What?!

Have you not cottoned on yet? Fact doesn’t defeat belief.

I’m thinking you thought I was getting at you specifically, I wasn’t. Oh dear, how sad, never mind.

eastender53
4 years ago
Reply to  Winston Smith

Fact doesn’t defeat belief?

https://thecompletepilgrim.com/seven-scientists-challenged-church/

Actually I don’t think about you at all. I have grass to watch growing.

Winston Smith
4 years ago
Reply to  eastender53

What the fuck is your problem?

BertieFox
BertieFox
4 years ago

Very well said

Dame Lynet
Dame Lynet
4 years ago

It appears from the above that no matter what I do (have a dodgy injection I don’t want, wear a mask I don’t need, change my life and behaviour in ways that are anathema to me) the frit ones will still be frit and will launch themselves into the hedge as I pass.

Seems to me then that it is their fear and paranoia that should be urgently addressed, not my desire to make my own choices about my body and life.

HelenaHancart
HelenaHancart
4 years ago
Reply to  Dame Lynet

I heard a fabulous phrase a while back: “I don’t buy into your delusions and I’m not part of your psychosis.” I’ve still yet to use it, as the neurotic drama-passers are too scared to come near me anyway, but it’s good to let that go through your mind as they leap into in-coming traffic to avoid you! I find ignoring their behaviour works best of all. Don’t reward them with any acknowledgements, unless they have genuinely stepped aside to allow you to pass. I can tell it actually miffs them off!

Dame Lynet
Dame Lynet
4 years ago
Reply to  HelenaHancart

Yes, framing them as deluded, as they are, is good strategy and ignoring is very powerful, some are actually waiting for thanks.

I can deal with confrontation, I just don’t want to have to; I don’t get a buzz out of it like some do. I dislike personal comments anyway, I find them intrusive.

Dylan2021
4 years ago

“Push for one million jabs a day to save…”

  • AstraZeneca, before its jab is completely banned
  • UK Government’s flagship and fake narrative
  • Malthusian maniacs’ plans to cull population
J4mes
4 years ago

Others they’ve used:

“…to save the NHS”

“…to flatten the curve”

“…to save granny”

“…for only a few weeks”

“…for the public to do their bit”

J4mes
4 years ago

Yes the hypocrisy of lunatic Covidians is astonishing, and almost takes my breath away at times.

7fonn7
7fonn7
4 years ago

Give up liberties xyz for juuuust a bit longer to “Save the (fill in the blank)”

TheFascistCoronaFraud
TheFascistCoronaFraud
4 years ago

“Forces are gathering against the relaxation of lockdown restrictions, the Observer reports, with Professor Andrew Hayward of NERVTAG warning that it would drive up the numbers infected with the India variant and that unvaccinated younger adults would be most at risk”

So let’s get this straight, a government Professor, this lowlife turd Andrew Hayward, is saying that a group of people who have as good as 100% natural immunity to Coronavirus and Covid19 are “at risk” from the Indian variant. So this is classic 2+2=5 doublethink – the unvaccinated young are immune in reality, but at risk in the world of psychological terrorism the people at NERVTAG want you to inhabit, which enables them to run further acts of terrorism and psychological warfare against the unsuspecting public. Can this man be prosecuted for telling such lies, or are these people free to be as dishonest as they like with no comeback whatsoever?

Why is the British taxpayer funding these people and their criminal institutions?

Paul B
4 years ago

Ah but, the comments cheer ya up! Surprisingly for twitter.

eastender53
4 years ago

I’m trying to get to the original.

92CE6800-D66E-4D99-AB27-1052B945BF31.jpeg
Milo
Milo
4 years ago
Reply to  eastender53

if you can get to the original – print it out and save it to send to the public inquiry.