News Round Up

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

47 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Hugh
Hugh
5 years ago

“masks pose pollutants risk”

Masking – filthy habit!

And Matthew Parris can shove his “vaxports” – he always was a wrong ‘un

karenovirus
5 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

We at LS have been pointing out the pollution risk (rather Actuality) since soon after masks were introduced, many of us provided photographic proof of the discarded filthy rags by way of evidence.

Some LS readers did the sums and worked out how many of these things would end up in general waste and so landfill and the Oceans; Billions.

Over the Bank Holiday weekend I had an overnight stay in our major regional hospital and noticed a new waste bin labelled

“Surgical Masks Only”.

Hopefully to be dealt with by the modern smokeless version of incineration.
So at least they are belatedly making an effort but I have never seen another one before.

helenf
5 years ago
Reply to  karenovirus

I’m even more concerned about the risks these masks could pose to human health. No mention in the BBC article about the possible consequences of the heavy metals and plastic fibres in the masks for the wearer, especially in the longer term. And that idiotic quote from the project leader about the HUGE benefits of wearing a mask so we must carry on doing that…give me strength!

karenovirus
5 years ago
Reply to  helenf

Agreed, that is yet another argument against them and just as important.

Annie
5 years ago
Reply to  helenf

I’m not wearing one. I’m Staying Safe.

Milo
Milo
5 years ago
Reply to  Annie

Oh God, the S word.

Milo
Milo
5 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

Imagine what you are inhaling from them into your respiratory tract and lungs if you wear them. And the BBC is obsessed with plastic microparticles polluting oceans – it would do better to worry about the state of the nations lungs from the masks which it has campaigned for people to be forced to wear.

rherbo
rherbo
5 years ago

For anyone interested, have a look at this form my friend has to sign if he/she doesen’t want the vaccine at the hospital he/she works in. Notice the loaded wording and assumptions about satisfactory briefing.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Pu92fbpMQroMkLCTNcId0_-3DuW7HXij/view?usp=sharing

RickH
5 years ago
Reply to  rherbo

I certainly wouldn’t sign that!

I’d write my own refusal and sign it, citing the clear breach of ethical standards, my scientific reasons for refusing and the clear omissions of necessary information.

TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
5 years ago
Reply to  rherbo

Wow that’s unbelievably loaded wording…

If a vaccine kills anyone after that the writer could face liability.

There’s ZERO about vaccination risks…

Anyone signing should ask to see who wrote that and if how they are dealing with the liability of recommending experimental “treatments” with unknown long term risks.

karenovirus
5 years ago

I’ve had a few face to face meetings with GPs and Consultants since the beginning of this year but not once with my own GP.

Last week I tried to book an appointment with her and was told the earliest would be the 15th of this month and had to settle for a ‘telephone consultation’ with someone else on the 7th.

Fingerache Philip
Fingerache Philip
5 years ago

Don’t hold your breath.

Fingerache Philip
Fingerache Philip
5 years ago

What happened to Mike Graham’s weekly talk with Peter Hitchens on TR last Monday?
It usually lasts around 25 minutes but this latest one was cut off after less than 3.
Censorship?
On YouTube, that is.

fourth_horseman
fourth_horseman
5 years ago

I heard Peter Hitchens on the live 11am broadcast, it was the usual length, I think it’s normal for TR to put up clipped parts of full interviews. PH usually puts a link up to TR interviews in his newspaper blog. Also on the TR app you can listen again.

Fingerache Philip
Fingerache Philip
5 years ago

Thanks, FH.

karenovirus
5 years ago

Local Live (mirror group news). 3/5/21 ‘A drinker was refused entry to a popular pub for not wearing a mask despite being medically exempt. When (the family) went for lunch last week he was upset at being told he would not be allowed in without a mask. (The pub) explained that they insist on masks – customers and staff alike – to keep people safe.’ ‘Terry’, who is severely asthmatic and also suffers from high anxiety explained that he was wearing a government approved exempt badge (lanyard) but the pub said they did not accept them even though the family would be having lunch outside. A pub spokesman said ‘A few of our staff have medical exemptions and we’ve ask them to wear masks too. We have spoken with the council and they have said *it’s not illegal for us to ask people to wear masks because this is private property*” This is wrong and clearly illegal on so many grounds so hopefully the publicity will attract some legal eagle who might offer ‘Terry’ some proper advice about Disability Discrimination, not to mention the staff. For newer visitors to LS who do not know your rights a pdf outlining the… Read more »

Jess
5 years ago
Reply to  karenovirus

It’d be nice to think everyone in the place would show support by getting up and leaving. Loudly.

Annie
5 years ago
Reply to  karenovirus

Blatant discrimination. The man should sue.

JohnK
5 years ago
Reply to  Annie

And here’s an example of what can happen https://disabilityrights.org.uk/first-face-mask-discrimination-case-nets-7-000 Quite a few months ago.

Jonathan Smith
5 years ago
Reply to  karenovirus

Private homes are private property yet if you provide a public service – like B&B – you cannot discriminate against customers with certain ‘protected characteristics’. Disability is one of them. Pubs might be private enterprises but they are providing a public service. The government was warned these conflicts with legislation would arise.

karenovirus
5 years ago
Reply to  Jonathan Smith

It’s been my belief since masks were mandated that the exemption opt out was made so wide and easy in order to encourage fighting in the aisles of supermarkets, which the MSM promoted for a while (and to lessen the risk of being sued if someone proved that the mask caused them harm).

Noumenon
5 years ago
Reply to  karenovirus

If you are that concerned about your private property privileges close your doors and sit on your pile of gold alone.

RickH
5 years ago
Reply to  karenovirus

It’s about the only use I can find for a smart phone – keeping cool and filming clear evidence of disability discrimination. Taking such places out of business would be justified.

TheBluePill
5 years ago

What’s next? Free six month supply of heroin with every booster jab?

Milo
Milo
5 years ago
Reply to  TheBluePill

Why not – prob can’t do much more harm than the vaccine.

karenovirus
5 years ago

‘Imperial’s pessimistic modelling proved wrong.’

Ferguson “The data is encouraging and very much in line with what we expected”

Yesterday I called him ‘Professor Pantsdownonfire’ for that lie.

Sarah Knapton in The Telegraph puts it rather more politely.

20210505_082149.jpg
Annie
5 years ago
Reply to  karenovirus

OK, Fungusson,
you lying little squit, show us your previous prediction.

TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
5 years ago
Reply to  karenovirus

He’s similarly blatantly wrong about vCJD, of course that provided opportunities for people to buy up beef farms on the cheap.

DevonBlueBoy
DevonBlueBoy
5 years ago

Imperial College modelling: previous exaggeration of deaths expected vs occurred:
2001 – Foot & Mouth: 150,000 vs <200
2002 – BSE: 136,000 vs2,826
2005 – Bird Flu: 200,000,000 vs 616
2009 – Swine Flu: 65,000 vs 457

Why on earth dis the fuckwits in Government not ask Ferguson to demonstrate his previous inaccuracies before listening to his “500,000 will die” forecasts and locking down the country as a result.

Milo
Milo
5 years ago
Reply to  karenovirus

He has had so many chances now over so many years after getting SO MUCH of his modelling wrong that you would think that by now MSM would have copped on that his doomster modelling cannot be relied on.

karenovirus
5 years ago

‘Baby Boomer Addiction To Booze Rose During Lockdown’. Daily Mail

They quote 50 units of alcohol indicates ‘probable dependency’ .
That equates to the 2 or 3 pints I used to drink on weekdays and a bit more at the weekend.

A decade or more ago we were nagged by Alcohol Concern and the like that more than 2 pints in an evening more than 3 times a week (or somesuch) made you a ‘problem drinker’. ie 16 units, I wish they would make their minds up.

7% of drinkers, many on furlough or WFH, have a hair of the dog once a month and we’re supposed to worry about that ?

Mixed response from The Mail commenters but some splendidly rabid hateful ones in the ‘worst liked’ section.

Milo
Milo
5 years ago
Reply to  karenovirus

It makes me intuit that a little way down the line prohibition will be ushered in – a whole new category of health terrorism to enforce on the masses once the virus has dwindled into a faint memory and social credit is on a sure footing.

chris c
chris c
5 years ago
Reply to  Milo

I thought mandatory veganism would be first but alcohol seems to have trounced it, for now

karenovirus
5 years ago
Reply to  Milo

Alcohol intake is already included in CCPs home version of Social Credit, negatively of course.

WeAllFallDown
WeAllFallDown
5 years ago
NonCompliant
5 years ago

Until a Turtle is found dead with a facemask strapped across it’s face it won’t matter how many of them end up in the sea and in landfill. A sad indictment on the complete lack of critical thinking amongst politicians, media and the wider population.

Noumenon
5 years ago
Reply to  NonCompliant

They probably won’t report that as it’s fake news and a threat to public health and probably national security as well.

karenovirus
5 years ago

‘Testing Times’ Sir Desmond Swayne MP is sceptical about provisions put in place from April 9th for each of us to take lateral flow tests twice weekly and asks if many of his readers have done so or intend to do so?

Good question, I don’t know what those provisions are and don’t know anybody who is doing so.

His main concern is the £30 billion a year this would cost at £5.00 a pop. So how come travellers are being charged anywhere from £60-£300 for such tests to re-enter the country (see yesterday’s roundup)?

Milo
Milo
5 years ago
Reply to  karenovirus

Thus proving that travellers are being charged very inflated prices – and that combined with the faff is to put people off travelling so decimating the travel industry. Some MP with half a brain should ask that as a PMQ next time BJ is at despatch box to see if he can explain the cost disparity between the weekly testing and the testing for re-entry after being abroad.

karenovirus
5 years ago

‘Nudge Of The Week Challenge’

Sounds promising, perhaps Lockdown Sceptics EDITORS might incorporate a weekly update on Fridays by way of light relief.

TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
5 years ago

Imperial’s “modelling” has always been “not even wrong”…

peyrole
peyrole
5 years ago

This post is against the article about ‘boosters’. It appears I am being blocked from posting against that article. Has this site crossed a the rubicon vis a vis vaccines? Bhakdi & co make a good case that having 3 injections will increase the chances of a deadly clot or internal bleeding many fold. Indeed verbally he says that he thinks its likely. Lets say with his and his colleagues years of experience and knowledge, with no particular ‘skin the game’ he is 50% chance of being correct. Why would any sane , reasonably intelligent person take those adds against a disease with an IFR of 0.15%? Under normal circumstances they wouldn’t. But of course the vast majority are purposefully denied the opportunity of listening to the likes of Bhakdi and instead are subject to constant psyop about the virtues of getting jabbed. There comes a point when anyone, Anyone Toby! has to sit back and wonder why and what is happening. Gone are the times for excuses that its all been a mistake and this is just politicians trying to get out of a hole. This could well be premedicated mass murder on a global scale that previously would… Read more »

TheFascistCoronaFraud
TheFascistCoronaFraud
5 years ago
Reply to  peyrole

Here is the latest publication from Doctors For Covid Ethics which got removed from their Medium account because it delivers so many knockout punches to the vaccine rollout.

COVID Vaccines: Necessity, Efficacy and Safety
https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2021/05/03/covid-vaccines-necessity-efficacy-and-safety/

karenovirus
5 years ago

Andy Burnham take note.

TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
5 years ago

Mussolini’s Definition of Fascism : “Everything inside the state, nothing against the state, nothing outside the state”

The anti-lockdown, anti tax, anti marxist (National Socialism is marxism without jews) leader was described by the tealeafgraph via scare quotes as fascist…

Truly the MSM is dead.

DevonBlueBoy
DevonBlueBoy
5 years ago

The BBC have completely vanished up their own backside. Below is the reply received in response to my complaint about the lack of BBC publicity for the anti-lockdown march. This was received after 2, “we’re sorry for the delay in answering due to Covid” pathetic excuses emails:

Thank you for contacting the BBC about our coverage of the Unite for Freedom protest, which took place on Saturday 24th April.

Many marches and protests take place in cities around the UK and unfortunately BBC News is unable to cover all protests that take place. Stories are chosen due to their editorial merit, for instance, if it’s breaking news or an update to a recent news story.

However, BBC News did cover this story, on our evening television bulletins and on our news website:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-56878486

Please note that we have also covered other anti-lockdown protests previously.

We have shared your concerns with the BBC News team.

Kind regards,

BBC Complaints Team
http://www.bbc.co.uk/complaints

They are really taking the piss if they believe this load of crap passes muster as a reasoned response

Milo
Milo
5 years ago
Reply to  DevonBlueBoy

Where to start? firstly, the ‘apology for the delay due to covid’ – pandemic is all but over – was there even a death yesterday??? normal news is starting to make a re-appearance so zero excuse for delay, then there is the ‘we can’t cover all protests in all cities’ guff. There was only one major march and it was in LONDON, where there are LOADS of journos covering parliament, westminster, Downing Street – and it was on a Saturday – they didn’t have a crew to cover it ??? Big bloated organisation like the BBC? ‘Stories chosen for editorial merit? I’d say that circa 1m people marching to protest against the lockdowns and the concerns about vaccine passports would have deserved to be covered for their editorial merit. Most 10 years olds could have told you that story had editorial merit. You have given BBC a chance to reply – you should complain to ofcom on grounds of BBC bias.