News Round Up
- “Up to 30 countries could be on ‘green’ list for early summer holidays” – A ray of sunshine from the Telegraph this morning. Let’s hope it’s true
- “Government foot-dragging threatens to wreck a glorious summer of sport and music” – Just when you were beginning to feel cheerful, Iain Duncan Smith pops up on the Telegraph‘s comments pages to sound a note of caution
- “Risk of suffering serious blood clot after AstraZeneca jab doubles in fortnight” – New data from MHRA reveals that the risk of getting a blood clot from the AZ vaccine has gone up from one in 250,000 to around one in 126,600 – or a rise of four in a million to 7.9 in a million, the Telegraph reports
- “Covid vaccines will cut transmission” – A major new study by Oxford University suggests that vaccines are cutting infection rates, according to the Daily Mail
- “There’s a conspiracy of silence among politicians about the hidden victims of lockdown” – “Twenty thousand pupils seem to have vanished from school rolls,” writes Fraser Nelson in the Telegraph. But no one is in a hurry to find them
- “Social distancing rules for hospitality ‘a good way off’ being lifted in Scotland, Chief Medical Officer warns” – According to the Telegraph, Scotland’s Chief Medical Officer Dr Gregor Smith thinks that the “proportionate” one-metre rule will be in place for a good while yet in Scotland’s bars and restaurants
- “What Johan Giesecke missed out” – Professor Martin Kulldorff felt there were a few important issues missing from UnHerd’s interview with Johan Giesecke
- “Pubs and restaurants need rational and evidence-based policy” – Hugh Osmond, the founder of Punch Taverns, explains in the Times why he and Sacha Lord are taking the Government to court over Covid regulations
- “Emergency Covid powers are becoming routine, warns ex-legal chief” – Sir Jonathan Jones QC told a committee of MPs that the Government has fallen into “bad habits” in its use of emergency powers, the Law Gazette reports
- “The Covidian Cult (Part II)” – Writing for Off-Guardian, C.J. Hopkins considers how the Covidian Cult became the dominant culture
- “Why is the BBC plugging Covid vaccine in pregnancy before trials are complete?” – The BBC’s Woman’s Hour jumped the gun, “dispelling fears” about the vaccine’s effect on pregnancy and women’s fertility before the trials were completed, writes Sally Beck in the Conservative Woman
- “The HART Bulletin” – The latest update from the Health Advisory and Recovery Team, covering mortality risk from COVID-19, vaccines for the pregnant, the risk of reinfection and more
- “We are so screwed” – Watch Dan Hannan tell the House of Lords that “the world into which we emerge from lockdowns will be poorer, colder, more pinched, more authoritarian”
- “COVID-19 curbs divide Italy’s coalition parties” – Italy’s National Unity Government is split over the country’s exit from lockdown, Reuters reports
- “The Vaccination Craze” (pdf) – A free preview of Corona Unmasked. New Facts and Figures, a book by Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi and Dr. Karina Reiss that’s being published on May 10th
- “Rollout of electronic bracelets to start in May” – According to the Jerusalem Post, Israel is going to start rolling out its electronic bracelets next month to ensure that incoming airline passengers comply with quarantine rules
- “Vaccinating everybody may not help Africa” – A mass global vaccine effort is “a classic case of medical colonialism” says Toby Green in UnHerd, “where rich countries bulldoze poorer ones into submitting to their public health goals”
- “Was Tanzania vindicated on Covid testing claims?” – President Magufuli was ridiculed when he abandoned testing after his “trials allegedly showed fruit juice and engine oil testing positive for the virus”, writes Sonja Elija in News Africa. But his refusal to place Tanzania under lock down now seems like the right call
- “Covid lockdown cost/benefits: A critical assessment of the literature” (pdf) – A working paper by Canadian economist Douglas W. Allen of Simon Fraser University which argues that “it is possible that lockdown will go down as one of the greatest peacetime policy failures in Canada’s history”
- “Fauci has chalked up 300+ media appearances over past year” – “For decades, Anthony Fauci was an unrecognisable Government bureaucrat,” writes Jordan Schachtel. “That all changed with the COVID-19 pandemic”
- “Not Even Gretchen Whitmer Wants More of the CDC’s Lockdowns” – Michigan has the fastest growing Covid caseload in the US, but as Ryan McMaken points out in Mises Wire, the Governor is resisting calls to impose a stay-at-home order
- “Vaccines should be available for all and mandatory for none” – “Vaccine passports could mark the crossing of the final frontier into a dystopia with no exit,” says Professor Ramesh Thakur in Spectator Australia
- “Fact-checking Covid vaccine experts” – A New Zealand vaccine expert claimed that “the risk of blood clot was 165,000 times higher after having COVID-19, compared to the risk after having the AstraZeneca jab”. Simon Thornley does a fact check for Covid Plan B, the Kiwi sceptics group
- “It’s not the mandates that matter, it’s behaviour” – Dr. Fauci was asked why Texas has a lower rate of infection than states with lockdowns. His explanation: “There is a difference between lockdown and people obeying the lockdown”
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Fraser Nelson’s Telegraph article purporting to be about 20,000 children ‘missing from school’ because of lockdown is entirely an attack on home schooling (a controversy about which I take no side).
Oh interesting. I can’t see beyond the paywall. At least pre-pandemic home schoolers had to be registered right? I assumed that the criticism was for parents who are keeping kids at home because they’ve been terrified, but haven’t registered as officially home schooling.
I grab 2 or 3 screenshots of the article before the paywall comes down. It’s a bit time consuming but sometimes worthwhile.
If you hit the ESC key as the page is loading and get the timing right the paywall doesn’t come down at all.
Or if you are on a mobile or tablet, hitting the X button in the web address box as the page loads works the same way.
Thank you, sometimes if you click off the begging letter the article can be read in full.
Actually this is something I can comment on with some authority. There are many more than 20,000 washing about the Home Ed community, I suspect. Schools are not admitting in some cases to the loss of students. They’re acknowledging deregistration and then keeping the children on the roll. Some even carry out a sustained campaign of harassment against the families, sometimes with the collusion of the Child Missing Education teams at the Local Authority. It’s quite appalling. Social services are involved and have to waste time visiting perfectly law abiding parents just to close cases, but because Home Education has become an “flag” for child abuse, they’re obliged to. But bums off seats reduces their budget. So this is a business loss that has to be avoided by whatever means, be that deception or an campaign of harassment. There are some very interesting parallels between the treatment of masks, vaccines and Home Education this year. The idea that the state can remove your parental rights over the manner in which your children are educated is the same as the idea that they can force you to wear a mask or lock you in your home on the basis of very… Read more »
Brilliant post, thank you.
The article does.mention the illegal practice of local authorities ‘off rolling’ pupils, dumping them off the school list to boost their stats.
I can speak with knowledge, as well. Parents are quite entitled to ‘home school’ children. The LA simply monitors in terms of basic sufficiency and that it is not disguising child abuse (remember – most abuse is within families).
I can’t recall IME any contestation of a parent wishing to home educate.
The law states that you have to educate your children, either through attendance at school or otherwise. There is no requirement to register as homeschooling. Through homeschool, children at least have the chance of learning to think critically and independently, without the indoctrination and brainwashing in various areas that seeps into every school subject. Given that parents have been forced to keep their children close by over the last year, there doesn’t appear to have been a wave of child battering, contrary to the belief permeated throughout our state “services” that all parents must be under constant surveillance as they can’t be trusted not to abuse their kids.
That’s very informative but my point is why is the article included in the roundup ? This site is not home-ed-skeptics.
Would have been different if Fraser had shown a significant increase in missing/home ed children as a result of lockdown but he doesn’t.
Oh gawd – another hobby horse made out of Covid.
Covid19 curbs divide Italy’s coalition parties.
New relaxed regulations include the following.
“Italians who have recovered from Coronovirus or have been vaccinated will be eligible for a six-month ‘green pass’ for regional travel, while those who show a negative test will receive a 48 hour Certificate.”
The direction of travel is clear.
I find the “recovered from” the virus one intriguing – the way our Gov was massively overinflating testing stats over the past few months – it would seem that almost the entire UK population has either died from or recovered from covid. So will they now be forced to admit that all those asymptomatic “cases” where PCR was abused are recoveries or false positives? Can’t have it both ways!
How will all those many people who are retrospectively convinced they had Covid before it became a thing supposed to prove it ?
How is anyone supposed to prove it? If I was perfectly well and a PCR test run at 35+ cycles (or whatever it is) told me I was actually infected then I wouldn’t believe it. Would I be more likely to believe it if I was ill – perhaps, but only if they gave me the PCR test “scores” and also ran the same tests for other similar viruses. If they put it on my death certificate would I believe it – still no!
They’ve made it very difficult to get hold of an antibody test for a reason. And the continued denial of the existence of T cell immunity.
The whole thing is bizarre.They need now checkpoints on every region for entering or leaving. Italy going back how it was in the15th Century full of ministates. How will it work in practice? If there was a problem with corruption in Italy imagine the blocked borders between regions? Night time, traders wanting selling products using backroads,falsified documents??The whole thing is a black farce. Politicians don’t believe or understand herd immunity and they cannot even look at a big federated state like the US where travel is free to all states. The amount of bureucracy corruption it will produce will be staggering.
I doubt if anywhere in Europe will have seen anything like this since nazi occupied Europe.
As for corruption, attached courtesy of the BBC
And perhaps that’s the point…
Ok, I’ve done a bit of digging on the numbers in France, resulting in the following. France deaths attributed to cv have been equivalent to around 2,000/week (adjusted for UK population) for some time, going back into February. In fact they were never much more than 3,000 (equivalent) in January, when the UK was over twice this IFR and going all out with their “vaccine” programme. As of April 20th, with about 8.4% of the French population aged over 75, in Ile de France (a region of France around Paris), only 6% had had a second “vaccination”, therefore suggesting the “vaccination” of over 75’s is ongoing in France. Meanwhile, in the UK, with over 10m having had both jabs, it can be taken as pretty much finished for over 75’s. So once again, we see large numbers of extra deaths “with” cv where “vaccination” of the elderly is taking place. Of course, there may be other explanations, and I would welcome input from those more knowledgeable on the matter, but, from what I can see, I have to ask, is this protection of the vulnerable, or is it a cost cutting solution – especially if we see the same scenario… Read more »
“Twenty thousand pupils seem to have vanished from school rolls,”
At least. But since there is no legal mechanism to force schools to report who is and isn’t on their lists we can’t know. Councils cannot force ‘free schools’ to make the report, and movement between the nations – England to Scotland, Wales or NI disappears into a black hole.
Therefore the missing children is likely just to be because lockdown restrictions have revealed the crack in the data collection system.
Is there not? I did some temping at a secondary school around 20 years ago and every pupil in UK had a pupil number and this was tracked on a database. So if you registered at a new school you’d need to call the old one to get their number (this was my role). There were no exceptions. Missing pupils can therefore be tracked, and is used for safeguarding when it’s believed that a child has been sent overseas for forced marriage/FGM etc.
Families do try and get around this though by importing a child (or even young adult) from a village overseas and putting them in the UK system as an imposter of the original one.
Sadly, children disappear all the time 🙁
In massive numbers, I remember reading a while back about the numbers that go missing from care in a short piece in a national newspaper and thinking why the hell is this not a great, big giant scandal. However, at least they are collecting data on that. Meanwhile, children who aren’t in care – no data is collected on those that go missing.
“The department does not collect datasets on children reported missing who are not in care, or ‘looked after’ by the local authority” Vicky Ford, Conservative MP for Chelmsford answering a question about children that go missing whilst in care.
https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2020-06-01/52030
I didn’t get this comment either. “Green lists” or lists of any colour do NOT make me cheerful. Only when I can go abroad sans-testing/vaccines/masks to any country that wants my tourism money (and there’s a lot of it saved up) will I be cheerful.
And why pick on IDS? He is one of the semi-good ones who is at least critical of the ministers and the nonsensical policies.
Will it be this decade? And what will happen when furlough ends – or is that another one that will be semi-permanent?
Totally agree – I don’t want any kind of coloured list. In any case, “green” is a misrepresentation. Green means “go”, no restrictions, proceed as normal. But there probably won’t be anywhere like that, maybe ever again.
Fauci says people who are locked down don’t obey the rules. Results bad.
Fauci says that people who are not locked down do obey the rules they don’t have. Results good.
Fauci concludes that only lockdowns stand between us and Armageddon.
Hasn’t it occurred to anybody that Fauci is (pardon bad language) a fucking imbecile?
(I’m jolly well shocked!). Could it possibly be that such sleight of hand is employed because he has a vested interest in his narrative? I’ve seen this before. It seems that Professor foot in mouth is doing the same sort of thing. Forgive me, but they look like spivs. Now, private Walker – do no panic!
I think you are right. Or the evidence just builds and builds that everything he has said and done and the models are wrong but there is not one ‘aha’ moment where he holds up his hands. The people that made the decisions will be the last ones to admit they were wrong.
‘Admit they wrong’, as in they made a mistake? They’ve manipulated statistics on seasonal virus to make it look like a far more devastating disease – right from the beginning, lying with their grossly inflated predictions of death. Why does the number of ‘covid deaths’ match the usual number of flu deaths during a period that the number of recorded flu deaths have plummeted?
They changed the way deaths are recorded -right at the start. They accumulate dodgy death figures season-on-season to make the figure continue to grow.
We all know they have, again, right from the start, used testing equipment that is not only unsuitable, but used in the wrong way, producing artificially high positives in favour of the abominable phantom virus.
Of course I could go on about how many of us already knew this plandemic was coming – you just had to be aware of Agenda 21/30, but many on this site shriek and gurgle and spit at the possibility that this is a global conspiracy to bring about depopulation and digital enslavement.
How can anyone, over year into this tyranny, still afford these maniacs a pardon, suggesting they made a mistake?
The other crucial background document is the Council of Europe report which is massively scathing about the forerunner of this – the Swine ‘Flu debacle.
The parallels are immense.
Not an imbecile, an evil liar
Well, I think he must be both to try to get away with such a ludicrous ‘explanation’!
Except that a lot of people probably believe him
Yes exactly, the bizarre thing is that many people will quite proudly repeat his blindingly obvious nonsense as fact.
Posted late yesterday by one off (?) LS reader ‘Elephant City’.
Short, concise and very professional summary of Faucis criminal responsibility for creating Covid19 by illegally funding gain of function gene therapy experiments in Coronovirus at the Wuhan Institute.
Well worth your time.
Ah good. So according to the Covid risk calculator my risk of dying of the vaccine is officially higher than my risk of dying of a virus I seem incapable of even catching… nice, where do I sign up?!
Yes, and last time I checked on the Yellow Card statistics, the Pfizer ‘vaccine’ is every bit as dangerous as the AZ one.
I suppose it is (just about) possible that he was being sarcastic? Well, I sometimes try to be generous!
A further call for a mathematician.
Supposedly our chance of dying post vaccine is now 1 in 126000. According to the Covid calculator, my risk of dying of Covid is 1 in 146000. However, this is assuming I catch Covid, right? What are the current chances of catching Covid and therefore the real risk of death? Compared to actively choosing to inject ourselves with the experimental vaccine?
current chances of catching covid and dying are about zero. its gone for the summer and (by their estimates) only a few thousand people in the whole country with it.
1 in 126000 is for a specific type of risk. doesn’t include long term risk. dont know if second jab similar or if your 6 months booster for the rest of your life will have same risk each time.
Your point is a key one. The retention of ‘Covid’ ‘measures’ is revealed as a massive fraud to any but the most gullible.
Unfortunately, a large proportion of the population fall into that category and gobble up whatever is put in their doggy bowl.
Add to that the the miniscule absolute risk reduction figures (which looks at real world overall risks), and not bothering with a vaccine comes out as the rational decision.
There’s another estimated 18000 hidden victims and that’s people with cancer who have not presented to primary care for referral into the cancer diagnosis and care system. Even a 3 month delay in diagnosis can have a profound effect on their cancer stage and so prognosis and treatment.
And that’s if they can get a diagnosis. I’m seeing reports not just of shortages of basic PCR reagents but even of consumables like pipette tips as everything gets channelled to the ludicrous amount of SARS-Cov-2 testing
The Oxford study on the efficacy of vaccines is quite interesting. Have a close look at Figs 1 and 2.
… and then consider the Ct values in Fig. 1 where disparities between groups show up. Remenber : above Ct 25 is (literally) garbage.
Re – vaccines reducing cases. I probably missed it, but couldn’t see the method by which we decide if people are to be tested for virus; is it random or based on a concern they may have the virus and/or have symptoms? If not the first one, do we know if the proportion of infections among the vaccinated is not highly under reported relative to the vaccinated: If you tell everyone there is a dangerous virus perhaps you are much more likely to be worried about the slightest symptoms (or even imagine them when you have none) and amplify those symptoms in your mind thus more likely to report symptoms, rate them higher and go get a test. If you tell everyone the vaccines are safe and effective perhaps they’re more likely to not notice symptoms or rate them lower and less likely to get a test. Similarly with vaccine side effects; are people less likely to notice or report them if they are told they are only minor and nothing to worry about? If we gave the opposite messages I wonder how different the situation would look? I presume the actual trials with placebos should overcome this problem (if… Read more »
Hence press reports last week of people ‘swamping’ A&E after reading about side effects of vaccines (from those same press sources).
Who is tested and how, and how many, has been more or less random and changed over time. Different tests, methods, settings, cohorts. Almost impossible to glean anything useful – quite deliberate I am sure.
Great video by Dan Hannan in a House Of Lords Committee in which he regrets the impact of lockdown on the young.
How the economy has taken a greater hit than in either World Wars or the Great Depression.
How he thinks that we will emerge from lockdown into a poorer, colder, more pinched and more authoritarian place than before.
He reflects on previous governments reluctance to retreat from restriction emergency measures.
Safe for Lefties and Remainers.
I think you’ve got the wrong glasses on – its right wing Brexiteers who are actually creating this shit-show.
Disclaimer : I’ve constantly argued against mickey-mouse analysis in terms of historical political prejudice. Just pointing out hard facts if you go down that pot-holed road.
“Risk of suffering serious blood clot after AstraZeneca jab doubles in fortnight” So, if Norway and Germany never warned about it, it probably would have been completely missed. The only reasoned UK and EMA noted it was because warning from mainly these 2 countries. Then EMA cited UK mass vaccination and almost no dangerous specific blood cloths as no reason to worry. But then later as they knew what to look for and evidence emerging from other countries putting pressure not to turn a blind eye to vaccine side effects and deaths, they noted it and rate of side effects and deaths started to increase. At this point I think the true risk is closest to the one Norway presented: 3 deaths from AZ vaccine in 133,000 vaccinated. All were healthy (no chronic conditions/disabilities) and young/middle-aged. Now we need to know how many of the 133,000 doses went to specifically healthy young and middle-aged, but there’s no info on that. So the lower limit is 3/133,000 ~ 1 in 45,000, or ~0.002% for young/middle-aged healthy (minimum since not all doses went to them). https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104882 Then you need 2 doses of AZ vaccine which doubles the risk to ~0.005% (rounding numbers,… Read more »
“So the lower limit is 3/133,000 ~ 1 in 45,000, or ~0.002% for young/middle-aged healthy (minimum since not all doses went to them).”
*the upper limit. in other word, the IFR is lower.
*the ‘IFR’ of the vaccine.
*ahh, I’m in a hurry. it is the lower limit of vaccine risk, i.e. ‘IFR’ of the vaccine. the ‘IFR’ of the vaccine is higher.
I think Norway actually had 6 cases, 4 deaths. Need to double check that tho.
Shropshire health authority sent me the latest Covid update: Week from the 9th to the 16th of April: New Covid cases: 30. Covid patients in hospital: 1. Covid deaths: 0.
SO WHAT ARE WE WAITING FOR?
Next week
covid deaths 1
exponential increase LOCK EVERYTHING DOWN!!!111
You got it, Chris!!!