News Round Up

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

9 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
ThomasPelham
5 years ago

Lilliputs article is meaningless, as are most of his musings – how can you discuss case rates without even touching on % positive and false positive rates of the lateral flow and PCR tests? He touches on the fact that schools opened (which doesn’t correlate with anything other than massively increased testing) without mentioning that they are being made to test twice a week. Frankly, the fact that the schools opened without measureable effect on R suggests that closing them was needless pain, and he’s letting the government get away with it.

A simple rule which was ignored in the summer too: the effect of a NPI must be the same on the way down as the way up, i.e. if a measure reduced R by 0.5, say, on release R must jump by 0.5 and we’d see a serious change in the curve of cases.

karenovirus
5 years ago

From the roundup
“Plans to get (sport and music) fans back into stadiums has failure written all over it”.

As a schoolboy I would travel across London with my mates to watch Chelsea F.C. home games (and a few local away) in the fairly certain knowledge of being able to pay to get in at the gate. I suppose taking yet another swab before travelling would not be too much of an imposition.

It was also possible (early 1970s) to go to a large Londin music venue and pay on the door to see such acts as Rod Stewart and Elton John.

These days I understand that all major sports and music fixtures require payment in advance but, in bid to cut out touting, the ticket is not your property in that you cannot sell it on in the event of your not being able to attend.

Who on earth is going to pay up front to see a sports or music fixture if you can’t even get your money back in the event of a spurious Covid test?

eastender53
5 years ago

Hugh Pym to of the State Broadcaster now ‘challenging the official narrative’. The beginning of the BBC starting to live up to it’s Charter? Sadly, no. An article saying you probably can’t catch Covid from surfaces. Hardly challenging! Fomite transmission pretty much debunked months ago.

steve_w
5 years ago
Reply to  eastender53

It will be 2030 before the BBC admits lockdowns do more harm than good. they were one of the driving forces behind it

eastender53
5 years ago
Reply to  steve_w

Hopefully by then we will have had our ‘Great Reset’. BBC defunded, Boris et al serving long sentences. Sumption probably too old to be ‘Lord Chief Justice’ but someone similar.

karenovirus
5 years ago

When I can walk into a pub, go up to the bar and chat shit with the bar person or whoever happens to be nearby and, upon being served, spot some friends at a table and join them for a while . . .

Then and only then will I be visiting a pub again.

eastender53
5 years ago

Apparently their are mutterings about awarding Whitty a Knighthood! A man largely responsible for massive human suffering and likely hundreds if not thousands of ‘non Covid’ deaths, stretching into the future. A man who stood on national television and flat out lied, not once but several times. There are many who want to see him in a Court of Law, not the Court of St. James!

steve_w
5 years ago
Reply to  eastender53

giving him a knighthood is just the government trying to show it got it right

Fred Goodwin was knighted

eastender53
5 years ago
Reply to  steve_w

Compared to Whitty, Fred the Shred is a paragon of virtue!