Latest News
British Public No Longer on Double Secret Probation; Just Probation
Okay, it’s an Animal House joke and those who aren’t of my vintage might not get it. But at one point, when Dean Vernon is trying to think of ways to nobble Delta House, he says, “There is a little known codicil in the Faber College constitution which gives the Dean unlimited power to preserve order in time of campus emergency.” On this basis, he puts the unruly fraternity on “double secret probation”.
The “alert level” was lowered today from “Level 4” to “Level 3”. The UK Government’s press release about it is full of “the science” – “The Joint Biosecurity Centre has recommended that… blah, blah, blah.” Apparently, the definition of Level 4 is “a COVID-19 epidemic is in general circulation; transmission is high or rising exponentially” and the definition of Level 3 is “a COVID-19 epidemic is in general circulation”.
Transmission hasn’t been “rising exponentially” since around March 18th, according to best estimates, so why has the Government left it until now to lower the “alert level” to 3? They really are making it up as they go along. Presumably, this charade is so Boris can say he’s abandoning the absurd two-metre social distancing rule because of “the science”.
Incidentally, according to the eagle-eyed reader keeping a beady watch on the NHS England daily death tolls, only two people died in English hospitals yesterday. He writes:
I was interested to read on the BBC news website a piece in which it was going through the various reasons people disbelieve some of the “facts” about COVID-19.
One of the reasons the BBC gave was that “people think the numbers are being misrepresented”.
I think the irony of that was lost on the BBC which regularly distort the numbers.
We only have to look at the officially produced figures released by the NHS every day, and the ONS weekly, to see for ourselves that the numbers quoted in the daily briefings are misrepresenting the actual figures.
He predicts that any day now NHS England will be forced to disclose that no people have died in English hospitals from COVID-19 the previous day.
Will that mean the Government drops the “alert level” to Level 2? Don’t bet on it.
Meanwhile, Britain’s largest hospital trust – the University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust – has become the first to declare it has no COVID-19 patients requiring treatment in intensive care.
Ripley’s Un-PC, Believe it or Not

I can understand Aunt Jemima being cancelled, even, at a pinch, Uncle Ben. I mean, it’s batshit crazy, but you can see the twisted logic. But Ripley from Aliens? The kick-ass space soldier who takes on one of the scariest creatures in the universe? She’s a feminist icon, surely? I mean, she’s right up there with JK Rowling… no, wait.
Incidentally, it isn’t just Aliens that now carries a “disclaimer” on Sky. According to the Mail, 16 films have now been put on the naughty step:
Sky has warned viewers that Breakfast at Tiffany’s, Flash Gordon, Aladdin and even a version of The Jungle Book from as recently as 2016 have “outdated values”, as broadcasters respond to concerns that some content is no longer acceptable.
Sky Cinema, the broadcasting giant’s movie service, has issued a disclaimer to its subscribers that some of its content “has outdated attitudes, languages and cultural depictions which may cause offence today”.
Sixteen films have the warning, including The Goonies, Aliens, Dumbo, Gone With The Wind, Lawrence of Arabia, Tropic Thunder, The Jazz Singer, The Littlest Rebel, The Lone Ranger, Balls of Fury and The Last Samurai.
Hang on a minute. Why hasn’t How to Lose Friends & Alienate People, the film based on my memoir of the same name, been given a “disclaimer”? Oh, the shame…
Has Smoking Always Been a Prophylactic Against the Plague?

A reader sent me the above extract from Thomas Hearne’s Diary. Looks like it isn’t just Covid that tobacco protects people from…
Greater Anglia Absolutely Determined to go Bust

A reader has drawn my attention to the absurdly alarmist notice on the home page of Greater Anglia’s website. Here’s the notice in full:
Can you travel another way? Help us keep trains clear for those who really need them.
Greater Anglia is temporarily running an amended rail service as part of the national effort to deal with the coronavirus crisis. To support this, it is important that people work from home if they can, stagger their travel times to avoid crowds, and use other forms of transport wherever possible.
To help stay safe, you should maintain social distancing wherever possible and remember passengers should wear a face covering whilst on our stations or trains. This will be mandatory from 15 June 2020.
Social distancing measures will effectively cut the number of people able to travel on our trains by up to 90 per cent – so it’s even more important that people take only necessary journeys.
Passengers should always book online where possible and travel at quieter times, and we urge those who must travel to be considerate of other travellers and our staff during these testing times.
It seems like a parody. Social distancing has “effectively cut” the number of people who can use Greater Anglia’s service by “up to 90 per cent”? How have they worked that out? Nonetheless, this warning seems to be having the desired effect. According to the reader:
We travelled on four trains today and we were the only people in the entire carriage in each case…
It’s heart-breaking. Rail businesses, strapped for cash at the best of times, are now doing their utmost to discourage people from using their services. Their chances of surviving this period of insanity must be slim. Although, to be fair, they’re just doing the Government’s bidding. Perhaps with the “alert level” falling from “Level 4” to “Level 3”, they’ll be able to reduce the number of rail users they’ll have to cut from 90% to 75%.
It’s not just a cynical old Tory like me saying this, incidentally. Someone forwarded this message by the Labour-supporting railway historian Christian Wolmar:
The railways emphasis on simply deterring people from using trains will undoubtedly have a long term effect. Usage bottomed out at around 5 per cent of previous levels but even now, in the middle of June, it is only approximately 11%. How is the industry going to start persuading people that train travel is safe? In fact, evidence from Japan, Italy and New York suggests that very few people actually catch the disease from public transport – in research, few clusters were found on public transport.
When will the rail industry change its message? Waiting for a vaccine could be worse than waiting for Godot. Social distancing and the railways are simply incompatible and the industry bosses should be honest enough to accept that and put out messaging to that effect. Unfortunately the unions have been complicit in this as well. Rather than supporting measures that would begin to attract people back, TSSA boss Manuel Cortes said on June 15th that he hoped the mandatory wearing of masks would not mean people started using the railways again. Yet, his members’ jobs depend on precisely that.
The long term consequences could be devastating. The hordes of the Treasury are already circling the rail industry’s wagons. They are already unhappy about the huge cost of the bail-out to the railway companies and things will only get worse if passenger numbers do not pick up substantially soon. Even optimists in the industry reckon usage will reach 50% of last year’s norm by the middle of next year. That means subsidies to operate the railway will be enormous – possibly £300m per month in addition to the £5bn or so a year for investment – and there will be enormous pressure to cut back on investment and even on services.
The railways must start welcoming people and not keep telling them to go away.
Schools Soon Able to Increase “Protective Bubbles” From 15 to 30!

How’s this for a non-climb down climb down? According to the Mail, Gavin Williamson has announced that schools will be able to increase the number of pupils in “protective bubbles” from 15 to 30 so all children can return in September. So, er, what’s the difference between a “protective bubble” and a “classroom”, then? Thirty pupils is the average class size in England, for heaven’s sake.
He said the “bubbles” would in future be expanded to “include the whole class” – which would be around 30 pupils. But he refused to give more details, saying full guidance for schools will be published over the next fortnight.
Expanded to “include the whole class”? So they’re not actually “bubbles” any more? Doesn’t make a lot of sense.
The only “bubbles” are in Boris’s brain.
Simon Dolan Gets His Day in Court
Simon Dolan has been given a High Court date for his application for permission to Judicially Review the Government’s coronavirus regulations to be heard: July 2nd.
The Judicial Review will seek to challenge the Government on three main points:
- Whether lockdown is unlawful because the Government implemented regulations under the Public Health Act 1984 instead of the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 or the Coronavirus Act 2020.
- The legality of the continuation of lockdown, and whether the tests for lifting it are too narrow, failing to take account of the economic and social impacts of lockdown.
- Whether the restrictions brought in by the Government contravene the European Convention of Human Rights, which cover the right to liberty, family life, education and property.
To date, the CrowdJustice campaign behind the Judicial Review has raised more than £182,000, with 5,400 pledges. Thanks in no small part to readers of this site. If you feel like contributing again, click here.
Sign the Stu Peters Petition

The Free Speech Union has gone to bat for Stu Peters, the Manx Radio host who’s been suspended by his employer and referred to the Isle of Man’s Communications Commission – the equivalent of Ofcom – because he had the temerity to challenge the concept of “White Privilege”. This is a flagrant violation of Stu Peters’ right to free speech and the FSU has written to the Communications Commission demanding it drop its investigation and exonerate him.
A petition has been started by some Isle of Man locals in support of Stu. Please sign it to show your support for free speech.
Another Poem
Tiree MacGregor, who has written a poem for Lockdown Sceptics before, has written another.
Of a Convention under Threat
“[A]nd the two honest men grasped each other’s hard hands in mutual understanding.”
— George Eliot, Adam BedeHandshaking: formerly, a civil act
In which the right hand, classically, grasped
Another’s and, depending on the tact
Of each, then “shook” (jerked up and down), while clasped
Briefly or long; in pressure varied, some
Shakes called “firm,” “crushing,” “wet fish,” even “non-”;
Of universal use; perhaps had come
From early in mankind’s existence on
The continent of Africa; of late,
Since civil life has seemed to many rotten
And Covid fears hold sway at any rate,
Avoided if not seemingly forgotten,
Forbye defences of civility
Put forth by lockdown sceptics (please which see).
Round-Up
And on to the round-up of all the stories I’ve noticed, or which have been been brought to my attention, in the last 24 hours:
- ‘England rugby fans could be BANNED from singing the iconic “Swing Low, Sweet Chariot” song because it originated among slaves in America 150 years ago‘ – The Woke Inquisition reaches new heights of idiocy
- ‘NI schoolchildren to follow 1m social distancing‘ – If one metre is good enough for the children of Northern Ireland, why not the children of England? Is it because four children under the age of 15 have died from Covid in England and none in NI?
- ‘We shouldn’t work ourselves into a frenzy about the threat of any “second wave”‘ – Ross Clark in the Telegraph
- ‘Escape from Lockdown‘ – Good podcast series hosted by Alex McCarron. In this episode he interviews Dr Hugh Willbourn
- ‘José Mourinho accuses FA of double standards over Dele Alli ban‘ – For once, I agree with the Special One. Many, many people have breached social distancing rules far more flagrantly than Deli Alli
- ‘UK debt now larger than size of whole economy‘ – The BBC reports that the UK’s national debt is now greater than its annual GDP for the first time in 57 years.
- ‘Boss of NHSX should be fired over app fiasco‘ – Guido Fawkes pronounces his verdict on the NHSX contact-tracing app car crash
- ‘Nobel Prize Winner Michael Levitt: How The West Got Coronavirus Lockdowns Disastrously Wrong‘ – Our old ally Professor Michael Levitt calmly lays out the case against lockdowns
- ‘Can’t stand free speech? You’re fired!‘ – Free Speech Union Director Douglas Murray with a modest proposal for the woke overlords now controlling the mainstream media
- ‘Counsel of the Woke‘ – Good piece in City Journal about the unholy alliance between public health experts and woke activists
- ‘The lockdown cannot mask this assault on human nature‘ – Sean Walsh with another robust piece in Conservatives Global
- ‘Global poverty: coronavirus could drive it up for the first time since the 1990s‘ – Alarming piece in the Conversation saying that coronavirus could push up to 400 million people into extreme poverty
- ‘The end of tourism?‘ – Piece in the Guardian on how the West’s mishandling of the crisis has decimated global tourism
- ‘Tories’ poll lead over Labour slashed to four points amid criticism of PM’s handling of coronavirus crisis‘ – Real story here is that Keir Starmer is so unimpressive he can’t even outpoll Boris
- ‘The threat has passed, so why are our civil liberties still suspended?‘ – Fraser Nelson poses a good question in his Telegraph column
- ‘The pitfalls of wrongthink‘ – Laurence Fox surveys the wreckage of his acting career after daring to say what everyone else thinks on Question Time
- ‘Pub chain “has no choice” but to open on 4 July‘ – Founder of pub chain Oakman Inns says he faces a stark choice: reopen all of its sites on July 4th or go bust
Theme Tune Suggestions From Readers
Two suggestions for theme tunes for this site from readers today: “Lunacy” by Swans and “Right to Decide” by Hawkwind.
Small Businesses That Have Reopened
A few weeks ago, Lockdown Sceptics launched a searchable directory of open businesses across the UK. The idea is to celebrate those retail and hospitality businesses that have reopened, as well as help people find out what has opened in their area. But we need your help to build it, so we’ve created a form you can fill out to tell us about those businesses that have opened near you. Now that non-essential shops have reopened – or most of them, anyway – we’re now focusing on pubs, bars, clubs and restaurants, as well as other social venues. Please visit the page and let us know about those brave folk who are doing their bit to get our country back on its feet.
Shameless Begging Bit
Thanks as always to those of you who made a donation in the last 24 hours to pay for the upkeep of this site. It usually takes me several hours to do these daily updates, along with everything else, which doesn’t leave much time for other work. If you feel like donating, however small the amount, please click here. Alternatively, you can donate to the Free Speech Union’s litigation fund by clicking here or join the Free Speech Union here. And if you want to flag up any stories or links I should include in future updates, email me here. (Note: please don’t email me at any other address.)
And Finally…
Amusing video by a YouTuber calling himself AwakenWithJP. It purports to be useful advice for risk-averse people – particularly about how they can protect themselves from the super-dangerous, Spanish Flu-like, killer-virus known as Covid.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
How To Check If Your iPhone Is Secretly A Coronavirus Tracker
https://publish.twitter.com/?query=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Faubrey_huff%2Fstatus%2F1273970104875679745&widget=Tweet
A similar setting has been installed on Android phones.
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT210393#1351
Installed with recent 13.5.1 update on iOS.
Seems to be turned off by default, although that could be my settings.
my old iphone 6 keeps prompting to update IOS but i have ignored for the last year. best thing as it also stops apple slowing it down
Problem is, you’re also leaving yourself exposed to whatever security issues have been found in the course of the last 12 months – which will be many. It’s a judgement call – do you want to give apple more access to information about you, or do you want to give every Tom, Dick and Harry who fancy themselves as a hacker potential access to your data?
Looks like its time to get a phone which you can root and install an custom AOSP rom onto. Take back control of your smartphone!
https://source.android.com/
https://www.xda-developers.com/
Much better, this is how it should be done. No more war and peace articles please, you’re killing us!
Every single “smart” phone is a tracking, tracing and listening device, regardless of the apps installed. It really is that simple.
Mine’s not smart.
Can they use tablets too, or only phones?
Most tablets just are giant phones. If you don’t want anyone tracking you it’s probably fine to put the device in “flight mode” when you aren’t using it, or to turn it off. Either requires you to trust Apple or Google to some extent (since you can’t usually physically take the battery out you don’t know if it’s really off). You could also take the SIM card in and out (but this is very fiddly and it’s a matter of time before you drop it and it vanishes into thin air) and turn off WiFi.
I don’t think the Covid thing has appeared on my (Android) phone yet but I think it will be fine just to turn it off in the settings. I won’t be installing NHSX as I don’t have enough free disk space– it’s taken up with higher priority apps such as plants vs zombies.
Thanks, flight mode it shall be.
You don’t actually need to do anything with the setting. With Bluetooth off it won’t work no matter what, and it clearly states that you need to download an app to even activate the setting. It’s just greyed out. Considering that we’re talking about a setting specifically for a virus that for the vast majority who even get it (far from even a bare majority of people) barely rivals a cold in its effects, I’m not happy about it, but nor am I worried. Just don’t install any tracker app they bring out. Seems like a pointless setting really – it has no function without a relevant app being installed, and if someone actually installs the app, why would they want the setting turned off?
I think it’s just part of the design of Android that you have to give permissions to things explicitly. Otherwise you might download a game or something that was using the Covid stuff for some sneaky purpose (although as you say Bluetooth has to be on as well, but you might have that on anyway for example because you were a BMW driver).
I don’t have one of those either.
Tens of thousands of coronavirus tests have been double-counted, officials admit
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/tens-thousands-coronavirus-tests-have-double-counted-officials/?WT.mc_id=e_DM1258181&WT.tsrc=email&etype=Edi_FPM_New_ES&utmsource=email&utm_medium=Edi_FPM_New_ES20200619&utm_campaign=DM1258181
Hilarious.
The tide has turned on 2 metre social distancing…a small victory but an important one since it will spread scepticism about other claims made by a weak Government, a powerful scientific cabal and the left-liberal political-media elite (whose hatred of Conservatives and Brexit, goes beyond all rational limits).
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/conditionsanddiseases/bulletins/coronaviruscovid19infectionsurveypilot/18june2020
Our latest estimates indicate that at any given time during the two weeks from 31 May to 13 June 2020, an average of 33,000 people in England had the coronavirus (COVID-19) (95% confidence interval: 12,000 to 74,000)¹. This equates to 0.06% (95% confidence interval: 0.02% to 0.13%) of the population in England or around 1 in 1,700 individuals. This estimate is based on swab tests collected from 24,413 participants, of which 10 individuals tested positive for COVID-19.
0.4% of the population infected is the definition of an epidemic I believe (happy to be corrected). So doesn’t this mean a coronavirus epidemic is NOT in general circulation?
Either that figure is absurdly low and therefore wrong or it means the epidemic is over.
But what do they mean by “had”, first off? If the virus is in your nose or at the back of your throat you’ve “had” the virus but many people are able to deal with the virus there.
I took it to mean that “had” means “would have tested positive”. As for what “tested positive” means in real terms… that’s a totally different question!
But if it’s just an antibody test then we know it’s missing huge swathes of the population who have various immune responses (including from other non-Covid19 viruses) that allow them to combat the virus without producing antibodies.
I think, given it says swab tests, that it’s PCR antigen testing.
I really don’t care. It’s over.
Pcr positive swab during the teating interval. There is also antibody serology for ever “had” the virus, but this is not it. And it’s definitely falling based on this data. It’s a trial for a much larger 300k study.
Looking at the recent death rates, around 50 per day and with known fatality rates of about 0.26% we can guess that three weeks before those deaths occured about 20K people were catching covid per day. So this fits those ONS figures within an order of magnitude (much betetr than Ferguson’s models ever fit real figures), seems pretty plausible.
You’re right about not an epidemic. I don’t know if the 0.4% is the boundary for definitions’ sake, but covid-19 has very much spread across the whole world without getting particularly large proportions of people in any given country infected.
I seem to remember reading somewhere that this either stopped being an epidemic early on or never got to the level of an official epidemic.
Think it’s more likely the former but can’t remember how long the epidemic lasted.
I think this may be what you mean? Mid March, the government downgraded the virus and it was no longer a High Consequence Infectious Disease.
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/high-consequence-infectious-diseases-hcid
You are correct about the definition of an epidemic. In the UK it has been below that for weeks (at least known cases), so the alert level should have been 2 for ages, but it’s only just been lowered to 3.
“Head of University Hospitals Birmingham says those infected ‘don’t seem as sick as before’” Similar to comments from Italian doctors. Maybe as some have argued, as the lockdown is eased, it becomes easier for more moderate mutations of the disease to dominate.
“A school near Bradford”? Hmmm…there may be some other motivation for banning blazers there, possible.
Keighley isn’t Bradford – though both are pretty dire.
Just saw this video (one of many by Carl Vernon): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H2DZDrbbbPU
We are being run by idiots. I won’t be going into any places until all the guff and antisocial distancing is removed.
If you like you could send a comment to the “Conservative” party via their website “Contact Us” link. I’ve just told them they’re all stark raving mad.
“We are being run by idiots.”
Jonathan. I have known this since March.
A schoolboy corporally punished at Eton for not smoking!
I have to say, that’s got to be pretty high up on the political incorrectness Top Trumps. If it were a working class black boy singled out for his colour and because he/she/whatever identified as a girl, it would pretty much take the (soggy) biscuit….
OMG there’s a glimmer of light at the end of the tunnel.
Here’s a comment from a Torygraph bedwetter:
Originally I was livid about the cheek-by-jowl BLM protests (not the many well organised, physically distanced ones I also saw) but now I’m coming around to the possibility that if there is no upsurge in cases over the next few weeks, they might have done the rest of the country a favour by volunteering themselves as human guinea pigs in an experiment that could free us all from this lockdown.
Keep posting your comments in the MSM guys. It’s like water dripping on a stone but don’t give up!
Especially all those BAME protesters who are supposedly more susceptible to the virus!
Could that letter perhaps have been written by a sceptic seeking to influence those who might believe him/her to be a genuine follower of the lockdown orthodoxy?
Does it matter?
herd immunity by the back door
Well the herd bit certainly applies to the bedwetters.
Received this email from my newly opened local independent optician, after I made it clear I would not be happy to wear a mask throughout my consultation next week (ideally I wouldn’t attend at all until it’s all back to normal, but I can’t ignore my vision issues any longer). “Thanks for your reply, it has caused quite a debate in the optical world. If you wish I am happy to see you without a mask given you do not have symptoms. The issue we have is that we have to get a lot closer than 2 metres during a sight test and hence we have had to agree to a raft of protocols so that we can recommence sight tests. We will be and have to wear full PPE.” A “raft of protocols”. How are these small, independent businesses supposed to continue to operate like this? They are only able to see one person per hour, whilst dressed in full, fresh PPE for every consultation, and seemingly have to disinfect the entire premises between clients. I get the impression they aren’t completely happy about my mask refusal, however the last two paragraphs suggest that… Read more »
Does it mean that if you don’t wear a mask, they’re forced to don a full hazmat suit?
And what if the overuse of disinfectant triggers asthma, eczema etc in staff and/or patients?
Erect notices saying that for health reasons, the use of hand sanitiser is not permitted on the premises.
I think they will be in hazmat regardless of what I do…
@A. Contrarian
I unfortunately smashed my specs, so took a trip to see my independent optician earlier this week.
I got the feeling the owner / optician was not happy about the costs off PPE, on top of being closed for three months.
My optician wore a medical mask and a light weight disposable apron. No full face shield etc. No over shoes.
As for only seeing one person per hour, I think that may apply to dentists, but not opticians, as I had an 09:00 appointment and the next person was seen at about 09:20.
As much as we do not agree with the constraints being put upon us and the professionals we need to see, we still need to look after our health, but keep fighting this stupidity.
One thing that did interest me was the optician used the tool which tests pressure in the eye, surely this creates an aerosol which goes into the air?
Mine has specifically stated 1 person per hour for sight tests. 45 mins for the test, the I guess 15 minutes of disinfection.
Yes, it does create an aerosol and one of the opticians I looked at was refusing to use them for that very reason.
Have you asked what would happen if you’re feeling faint or dizzy while wearing the muzzle at the same time you’re being examined? Because that could be a possible get out clause.
Yes, hypothetically, let’s say you faint while wearing the required mask and get injured as you fall – can you sue them, because you would not have fainted otherwise? Or say the mask induces a major asthma attack, you land up in hospital where you catch the virus – whose fault is that?
There was some discussion about that yesterday or the other day in this same blog but with regards to transport. I reckoned that it could be TFL or the relevant company could be sued if say you were in a bus or tube and the driver passes out because s/he was wearing a mask or you as a passenger faints due to the mask or face covering that you could be wearing.
In this case I suspect the practice would be responsible but I’m not sure. Any lawyers here who can answer this?
I gave some basic info about why masks are not actually that effective. Then I said that they make me feel panicky and faint. Job done.
Well done. Hope the optician takes that into account.
If masks work, then surely only one party really needs to wear one? Because the worker wearing it will be protected from any virus the patient might be carrying and the patient can’t catch anything from the worker who is wearing the mask? Or am I missing something? As far as the optician, dentist, or whatever is concerned, they cannot be sued for passing a virus to you if they are wearing ‘protection’ – if you choose not to wear a mask for ‘protection’ yourself then that is surely up to you?
Some mask advocates say that masks don’t protect the wearer, but they protect others from the wearer’s germs. But I think that only applies of the wearer is symptomatic i.e. coughing and sneezing, and I despair if someone would still go to the optician in that state.
I think at the moment it’s up to the optician whether or not they insist you wear a mask. According to his “instructions” from on high, it’s discretionary, but he seemed fairly keen that I wear one (for my protection, you understand). He’s using the guidelines given to GPs, but sitting in a crowded waiting room full of sick people seems quite different to me from a one-on-one scenario like an opticians.
I don’t think you’re missing something. It just demonstrates how stupid this is.
“Stu Peters, the Manx Radio host who’s been suspended by his employer and referred to the Isle of Man’s Communications Commission – the equivalent of Ofcom – because he had the temerity to challenge the concept of “White Privilege”. “
Someone (possibly Toby) linked the article by William Clouston (SDP leader) in Spiked the other day, which included a pithy comment about the idea of “white privilege):
“I recently spoke to some members of our party, the SDP, about the concept of ‘white privilege’. Among our many working-class members, I heard terrible stories of ancestors who died of pneumonia and TB, people losing fingers in industrial accidents, grandfathers who died coughing up coal dust, and families of six living in two-room Tyneside flats. These stories don’t fit into BLM’s crude racial narrative because our society is far more complex than these ideologues would want to describe it as. This racialisation of politics and its assertions of ‘white privilege’ only serves to erode the historic and current struggles of Britain’s working class.”
Spiked, The BLM movement could not be more wrong
Good example above of someone quoting a selected portion of an article plus a link, rather than posting the article in its entirety!!!
According to these neo-Jacobins, even a homeless white man has white privilege. It’s nothing to do with reality. It’s a purely theoretical mind vice, used to discredit people who may have an opposing view, to dismiss them on the basis of, quite literally, their skin colour.
The British men who were maimed and killed in the two wars, and those Germans they were fighting who received the same, all were bearers of ‘white privilege’.
Every white person in jail has ‘white privilege’. Every white rape victim has ‘white privilege’.
Absolutely. There should be no hesitation in calling out BLM activists as what they are – dishonest, manipulative scum promoting racial hatred, and their sympathisers and defenders as dupes and worse.
Those who give them craven submission by “taking the knee” or by giving credence to their supposedly noble cause should be likewise viewed with straightforward and open contempt.
It’s childish. Lazy governments have allowed this rubbish to proliferate.
lol, people lost a lot more than fingers in industrial accidents. Fatalities in coal mines were a weekly occurrence in the nineteenth century. You can check this page for a selection of the injuries sustained by “white privileged” coal miners in nineteenth century Scotland:
http://www.scottishmining.co.uk/338.html
And I’d welcome a chance to tell him to his face to F*ck off!
Always thought Parris was a complete c**k, and it’s nice to see it confirmed.
Rather than “over-55s” paying for all the costs of this, it should be all supporters of lockdown, of whatever age.
Supporters of the lockdown should stay in it forever, and financially pay off ALL the debts and damage it caused.
He’s really going to suffer if they slash his state pension, isn’t he?
Unlike the rest of us, including today’s youngies, when they become oldies.
Well presumably the parents have gobs of dosh to buy spare school clothes and they obviously have a washing machine at home.
“It would be a great shame if a combination of unfounded fears over the virus and a proposed well-meaning change in the law were to consign yet another of our traditions to the scrapheap.”
Tradition?
Vomit vomit vomit.
I read a copy of The Times about a week ago, M.Parris had a column on the first page of the opinion section, he was starting to realise then that lockdown was the wrong move.
Surely there can’t be anything wrong with the Tranny film Lawrence of A Labia.
I think you must be talking about the Japanese version?
Jeez man, these are meant to be comments not fucking war and peace. If you want to keep posting like this for god’s sake start your own blog or join a forum, as it slows down the whole damn comments section!
Disagree.bIt would be hard for most of us to get hold of this relevant stuff if it wasn’t posted here.Toby’s list is invaluable, but can’t jump us over paywalls etc.
Problem is though that this is a comments section, not a blog or whole article section. This person has posted over 5,400 word in total straight away after Toby has blogged, and he does it each day making a shit experience for anyone trying to read through these comments, and it slows down the comments sections as comments of this length is not what the comments section is designed for.
I rarely come to the comments now trying to wade through it all is too much, and these essays certainly don’t help.
You came today though … ?
Would you like a dictionary?
I didn’t read it, though I have no problem with it. You don’t get to police content here.
They might as well abandon uniform. For the last decade or so it’s been nothing but a money spinner for authoritarian crooks masquerading as head teachers in schools that are less and less interested in teaching and more and more in just brainwashing children into obedience and rote learning for exam grades, being made to take the subjects that will make the school look best in league tables not what would actually help the children in the careers they desire.
Don’t let all the zealots see this, they’ll try to use it to promote the horrors of veganism, even though we all know that the virus definitely won’t survive cooking.
Another fucking war and peace, jeez mate just start your own blog and post a link to it!
Stop posting whole fucking articles, just post the bloody link to them.
Unfortunately its behind a paywall so we can’t all read it. HA has posted the link before the article so you can click on that.
Problem is you still have to trawl through all the articles he’s posting, and the oldest posts by default always appear at the top of the comments.
Then PAY UP if you really want to read it. It surely doesn’t cost the earth!!
Have to say, I’m beginning to see your point …
long poems are tedious too)
Not another whole article, give us a break man. Are you posting the whole of today’s Telegraph?
FFS, another whole article, just do the link to it.
Paywall.
But could they do us for copyright violation?
Us?
Yet another full article posted, this is ridiculous
I came across a very interesting comment regarding social isolation on a off-guardian article here:
https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/18/lies-damned-lies-and-covid19/#comment-193772
Its all very interesting but I draw your attention to the following part
Perhaps then this can help to explain that while the risk posed to most from the virus recedes from very little to essentially zero we see people seeming to become ever more insane and neurotic. Not only have they been bombarded via the MSM with covid terror their social isolation has made them more likely to absorb this information without question. They have been very effectively brainwashed by the combination. The cynic in me even considers if this was intentional from the start.
Wasn’t that Stalin’s technique during the Purges? Isolate the victim ( a resolute and courageous opponent – would have had to be) p, bombard him with bullying propaganda, make him fear for his life, and after a few days he will shamble into court and confess to anything.
But even Stalin didn’t practise this fiendish technique on the entire population.
The “Clap for the NHS” is very much like the clapping at Stalin’s speeches, which went on for ages as the first person(s) seen to stop clapping would be shot as they weren’t true Communists. Compare this to the outing of neighbours on social media for not supporting the NHS by not clapping on a Thursday. The next one will be labelling people for not taking a knee on the doorstep or at work.
They had to ring a bell to make them stop clapping and sit down again.
if it gets to the point that you must take the knee I will comply a la Bruce Forsyth
Bend the knee, not ‘take the knee’
I prefer taking the p
Spot on.
“But even Stalin didn’t practise this fiendish technique on the entire population.”
Might I suggest that you read up on the gulags?
I’m a Russophile, but even I have nothing good to say about Stalin.
Probably pretty valid, although terrorisation through propaganda, or as SAGE put it “the perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased among those who are complacent, using hard-hitting emotional messaging” appears to have been effective enough on the gullible 90% isolated or not
We also think this lockup has many of the features of torture. So many of the techniques are there: the isolation, the fear, the lies, the suspicion, the snitching, the arbitrary and conflicting information, the horrible rituals – the briefings, the clapping. Even this bizarre ‘woke revolution’ seems to be part of it, somehow. It’s subtle and insidious and, we’ve found, it makes you doubt your own judgement. It can also make you think you’re alone in it. We constantly have to remind ourselves that we’re not. There’s this site, off-Guardian, UK Column, dear old nutty (but basically right) Vernon Coleman and many, many more online. We have to keep reminding ourselves that, although in a minority, we do come across other LSs unexpectedly in queues, at bus-stops (before we had to stop using PT) etc. BTW, don’t fall for the idea that the ludicrous ‘alert levels’ are anything to do with incompetence. If they meant anything, we’d be at Level 1 but they were never meant to make sense, just to control and confuse us, 2m rule and ‘following the science’, likewise We are in the conspiracy not cock-up camp, there’s too much evidence of planning… Read more »
Still a lot of people out there who just maintain we are all conspiracy theorists, though, despite the mounting evidence that this is a long-planned and coordinated attack on the world’s population (with harder attack on what Andrew of ‘Peerless Reads on youtube would call ‘seats of power’ – ie countries with global political influence, like the UK).
That’s a really interesting point, Carrie. It shows that there’s much analysis still to be done!
I agree there is an agenda behind the lockdown and coronavirus is not the reason behind lockdown. What makes me suspicious is that lockdown is a disproportionate reaction to a disease which is not very dangerous and the threat from coronavirus has been massively exaggerated. There are theories as to why the lockdown was introduced and what is striking how the effects of lockdown match these theories exactly. David Icke suggested the plan is to kill small and medium businesses so that big businesses have a monopoly and buy the assets of bankrupt businesses. The lockdown has crippled businesses as they have gone for at least almost three months not being unable to operate. Smal businesses don’t have the cash reserves to go for long periods unable to trade. The supermarkets and Amazon are getting trade from closed businesses eg supermarkets get increased alcohol sales as people can’t use pubs. David Icke also suggested the plan is to deliberately create mass unemployment and take people’s financial independence and make them dependent on the state through a basic income which will have conditions. If the conditions are broken eg you protest your basic income is taken away and this will be… Read more »
I am convinced this virus is a convenient weapon to use against us. The facts are the majority are completely taken in by it. Whether it will work a second time remains to be seen.
Lockdown is a nasty tool used against. The term lockdown is used in prisons when prisoners are confined to their cells. Under lockdown your life is taken away from you. Many can’t run their business or go to work. Until recently you couldn’t meet family and friends from outside your household and now you can only meet in limited circumstances. Leisure activities such as pubs, eating out, concerts, festivals and travel are not allowed. The country has become a giant prison.
I’ve thought this from the word go and sometimes on here felt pretty isolated. You know: ‘one of them conspiracy theorists’. Gratified to see that others are expressing this to one degree or another in greater numbers now.
I don’t think oil is becoming scarce- there is an awful lot of it, even in countries like Venezuela, so I’ve been told by a friend who has worked in the industry all his life, and also through my reading around the subject of energy.
I do try to hope that this is just a massive panic and that the government is simply, dishonestly, desperately trying to save face, because otherwise I would absolutely despair and somehow we have to keep our spirits up. Sometimes I think I shouldn’t read this site as it’s like being constantly reminded of how idiotic everything is at the moment. But I enjoy the comments and the articles…
Went for a nice long walk in the lovely sunshine today and almost home, having forgotten about all the nonsense, here comes a youngish man in mask and gloves. It was like a slap in the face.
I personally don’t agree with Vernon Coleman’s view oil is scarce but if you wanted to preserve oil by reducing demand lockdown is the perfect way of doing this.
I am not afraid of the future, hope that sentiment is shared by everyone on this forum)
Good but extremely chilling summary of the situation.
last american vagabond is a youtube channel that covers the American angle well.
Of course it was intentional
Up up up ! ( Clapping )
This is likely horribly selfish but I won’t pay for something I didn’t ask for and utterly disagree with – lockdown. I need what money I have to look after myself in my old age because I won’t trust any government to do that. Any government which tries to steal from my savings account like Cyprus did a few years ago, will immediately lose my vote and what money I have left will be transferred abroad. Of course, next on the list would then be capital controls. Watch out for those. In the early 70s we could only take a small amount of money on holiday abroad with us.
So they might start thinking about treating more trivial maladies, such as cancer?
Loved the How to stay safe video, absolutely nails it and really funny. Loads I could quote, but in particular:
(2:37) “And the only thing I have to sacrifice is my freedom, human connection, adventure and my personal sovereignty”
“Your protection has become your prison, you’re definitely safe in there. And it looks good on you”
“Thank you!”
As it’s looked to a sceptic since day 1 (whenever that was)
The government’s defence against the lockdown legal challenge is that wide margins of legality are acceptable in respect of government decision-making based on scientific evidence.
Hmmmm……wasn’t lockdown based on a model?
‘The computer model was huge—it analyzed every river, sewer treatment plant and drinking-water intake (the places in rivers where municipalities draw their water) in the country.’
‘When I presented the results to the EPA official in charge, he said that I should go back and “sharpen my pencil.”
‘After three iterations I finally blurted out, “What number are you looking for?” He didn’t miss a beat: He told me that he needed to show $2 billion of benefits to get the program renewed.’
‘I realized that my work for the EPA wasn’t that of a scientist, at least in the popular imagination of what a scientist does. It was more like that of a lawyer. My job, as a modeler, was to build the best case for my client’s position.’
https://www.climate-skeptic.com/2014/07/2361.html